-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
CONTROLLING EXPECTATIONS
A controlling expectation is a statement about the future which
is considered observational but is in fact causal.
Controlling expectations are one form of God Postulate.
The God Postulate is that condition which the pc has been most
trying to change with effort and which the pc is the most convinced he
can never change. He keeps a long record of failures to prove it.
Effort can never change the outcome of a God Postulate, only
changing one's mind can.
A God Postulate is that postulate which the preclear thinks is
true because he has observed it to be true, but which is in fact true
only because he considers it to be true.
His observation after the fact of his consideration is used as
proof that his consideration has nothing to do with it. He pretends
his consideration comes after the observation rather than before it,
and thus cements in the persistence of the postulate based on total no
responsibility for being an effect.
In otherwords he turns Looking by Knowing, into Knowing by
Looking, which is the classical form of the Consideration -
Observation flip flop.
With Looking by Knowing, one first knows (considers) then sees
(observes). This is causal.
With Knowing by Looking, one (thinks) one first sees (observes)
then knows (considers). This is being effect.
AS-IS: Knowing -> Looking, Consideration -> Observation
ALTER-IS: Looking -> Knowing, Observation -> Consideration
AS-IS is being cause, Alter-is is being effect.
Notice that Looking is BELOW Knowing on the Know to Mystery
scale, so how can Looking give rise to Knowing?
Controlling expectations are specifically God Posulates about
one's FUTURE.
He is running on an alter-is, he thinks he has observed enough
future in his past to have figured out how things are going to turn
out in his future. It's a prediction, an expectation based on
observation, rather than consideration!
His causal connection to his future escapes him.
When a preclear has located his one or more controlling
expectations, he will then see why his future has been turning out as
it has.
He will understand his causal relationship between himself and
his future. It won't be specific necessarily but it will be general
enough for him to see how he is controlling the general direction of
his future.
This is a major turning point in the preclear's existence as he
understands why he is going where he is going.
After that he can work on adjusting his controlling expectations.
Then he is no longer headed down by being an effect, but headed
up by being cause.
It is not sufficient to merely try to be cause to override being
an effect. One has to see how one HAS been cause all along, that he
has been sitting in the Seat of Sovereignty has to come home to him
with perfect certainty, then he can adjust the God Postulate to better
tune his future.
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Thu Mar 23 13:53:04 EST 2006
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sat Feb 19 12:00:04 EST 2022
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore319.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFiESIUURT1lqxE3HERAoeHAJ9vRhjGmrN98D/bsSzxsdhodKUePQCeJFh1
hxAPs8pl3hoo5sScm+R+Npo=
=oEv1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Thursday, March 3, 2022
ADORE283 (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
PRINCIPLES OF ADORE
1.) The Self can have anything it desires merely by desiring it.
At each stage of the desiring process the Self can veto the creation and
let it go back into vanishment. Only by saying 'This is good, I like
this!' can it enter into the following stages.
2.) The Self desires undesirables for a while.
3.) Persistence of whiles is caused by resistence.
Acceptance with expectation of vanishment causes vanishment.
Resignation ('acceptance' with expectation of persistence) causes
persistence.
At first the being resists causing persistence, then 'accepts'
(resigns) causing more persistence.
"Dear Lord, teach us to 'accept' what we can not change" is a trap.
4.) Resistence to the while is created by considering the while is
forever. This invokes a NATURAL resistence born of violation of
Sovereign Desire which is to only experience a while for a while. The
very thought of a temporal forever will put the soul into a raging fury,
and everything will go crystal solid on him instantly for as far as the
eye can see.
All things that are posulated, are postulated in a while. Without
the while there is no creation.
Thus the original creation of something INCLUDES both its inception
and deinception at the end. Beginnings and endings are postulated at
the same time.
This is an as-isness of the creation.
The being causes a persistence by entering the while, and
considering that only the beginning has been created and that the end
will never happen.
This creates fury and solidity.
The question 'When will this ever end?' starts the cycle of Q&A
(Questions and Answer) with the original source point which knows damn
well when it will end, because it was created with a beginning and an
end, and this self deceit causes relentless time and the endless quest
for surceasement which forever fails.
The end arrives when re-enlightenment as to the source point is
attained.
Until then he lives in dying despair.
5.) The resistence is held in place by travestic logic, gorgeous
ridiculousness. All persisting sorrow is humor entombed in lies and
illogic. All tragedy gains its power from travesty (of logic). Humor
is the prior truth, sorrow is the persisting result of the lie.
6.) While in the while, the self knows that sorrow is forever and
hopelessly serious, and that nothing can be done about it. The soul
considers that 'this must never happen again', and tries to create
solutions that will guarantee that 'this will never happen again', and
he will engage in forgetfulness, occlusion and oblivion to create the
illusion that the sorrow never happened in the first place. Other than
that, the soul seeks continuously to find 'what will ever make this up
to me', but remains forever unconsolable.
He is off the creation point into a Q&A, 'What can be done about
this?' The question seeking an answer creates time and further removal
from his original source point of creating the thing in the first place.
Worse he wants whatever solution he finds to persist, and thus
every solution he creates eventually becomes yet another persisting
problem to him. He gets further and further away from the original
humor and creation point and deeper and deeper into travesty and
tragedy.
7.) However once the lies and illogic holding the sorrow in place
are spotted, the creative humor is returned, and having lived the joke,
it becomes worthwhile with high appreciation for ludicrous demise. He
would do it again if he weren't so busy creating bigger and better jokes
to live. The humor that created the sorrow is self consoling. Once it
is found and run out, the sorrow vanishes in laughter and tears, and the
whole event erases forever, it becomes like it never happened in the
first place,
One knows one is getting close when sorrow and laughter alternate
in strong frenzy.
One is even closer, when one can not tell if one is laughing or
crying, they become the same thing.
In the end the soul is finally consoled, he found 'what would ever
make this up to me?'
"Laughter is the only kind justice there is, and the only justice
you will ever need forever for real. This thing ain't called a religion
for nothing." - Adore
At this point the event can happen again, but won't ever happen
again unless the being desires it to. That's the only thing better than
must never happen again. That's the best Source can do.
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Tue Sep 13 07:12:19 EDT 2005
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Tue Mar 1 12:00:02 EST 2022
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore283.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFiHlESURT1lqxE3HERAjjBAJ44s6QOwvkdbVCCCa/W7UTkrt0NBQCg2pGB
TlPx9RRj4z52liw2HytJ1Ew=
=CzKQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
PRINCIPLES OF ADORE
1.) The Self can have anything it desires merely by desiring it.
At each stage of the desiring process the Self can veto the creation and
let it go back into vanishment. Only by saying 'This is good, I like
this!' can it enter into the following stages.
2.) The Self desires undesirables for a while.
3.) Persistence of whiles is caused by resistence.
Acceptance with expectation of vanishment causes vanishment.
Resignation ('acceptance' with expectation of persistence) causes
persistence.
At first the being resists causing persistence, then 'accepts'
(resigns) causing more persistence.
"Dear Lord, teach us to 'accept' what we can not change" is a trap.
4.) Resistence to the while is created by considering the while is
forever. This invokes a NATURAL resistence born of violation of
Sovereign Desire which is to only experience a while for a while. The
very thought of a temporal forever will put the soul into a raging fury,
and everything will go crystal solid on him instantly for as far as the
eye can see.
All things that are posulated, are postulated in a while. Without
the while there is no creation.
Thus the original creation of something INCLUDES both its inception
and deinception at the end. Beginnings and endings are postulated at
the same time.
This is an as-isness of the creation.
The being causes a persistence by entering the while, and
considering that only the beginning has been created and that the end
will never happen.
This creates fury and solidity.
The question 'When will this ever end?' starts the cycle of Q&A
(Questions and Answer) with the original source point which knows damn
well when it will end, because it was created with a beginning and an
end, and this self deceit causes relentless time and the endless quest
for surceasement which forever fails.
The end arrives when re-enlightenment as to the source point is
attained.
Until then he lives in dying despair.
5.) The resistence is held in place by travestic logic, gorgeous
ridiculousness. All persisting sorrow is humor entombed in lies and
illogic. All tragedy gains its power from travesty (of logic). Humor
is the prior truth, sorrow is the persisting result of the lie.
6.) While in the while, the self knows that sorrow is forever and
hopelessly serious, and that nothing can be done about it. The soul
considers that 'this must never happen again', and tries to create
solutions that will guarantee that 'this will never happen again', and
he will engage in forgetfulness, occlusion and oblivion to create the
illusion that the sorrow never happened in the first place. Other than
that, the soul seeks continuously to find 'what will ever make this up
to me', but remains forever unconsolable.
He is off the creation point into a Q&A, 'What can be done about
this?' The question seeking an answer creates time and further removal
from his original source point of creating the thing in the first place.
Worse he wants whatever solution he finds to persist, and thus
every solution he creates eventually becomes yet another persisting
problem to him. He gets further and further away from the original
humor and creation point and deeper and deeper into travesty and
tragedy.
7.) However once the lies and illogic holding the sorrow in place
are spotted, the creative humor is returned, and having lived the joke,
it becomes worthwhile with high appreciation for ludicrous demise. He
would do it again if he weren't so busy creating bigger and better jokes
to live. The humor that created the sorrow is self consoling. Once it
is found and run out, the sorrow vanishes in laughter and tears, and the
whole event erases forever, it becomes like it never happened in the
first place,
One knows one is getting close when sorrow and laughter alternate
in strong frenzy.
One is even closer, when one can not tell if one is laughing or
crying, they become the same thing.
In the end the soul is finally consoled, he found 'what would ever
make this up to me?'
"Laughter is the only kind justice there is, and the only justice
you will ever need forever for real. This thing ain't called a religion
for nothing." - Adore
At this point the event can happen again, but won't ever happen
again unless the being desires it to. That's the only thing better than
must never happen again. That's the best Source can do.
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Tue Sep 13 07:12:19 EDT 2005
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Tue Mar 1 12:00:02 EST 2022
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore283.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFiHlESURT1lqxE3HERAjjBAJ44s6QOwvkdbVCCCa/W7UTkrt0NBQCg2pGB
TlPx9RRj4z52liw2HytJ1Ew=
=CzKQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
ADORE201 (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
ACTUAL vs REAL
Nah, Phil, you are wrong.
Actual means what is true.
Real means what we think is true.
Context's do not change the nature of actuality, only the nature of
reality.
The world is either a virtual reality posing as actuality, or it is
actual.
Something is actual.
But people think the car in their dreams is actual until they
wake up or go lucid in the dream.
The DREAM is actual, the conscious color form and the perceiver
of such is ALWAYS actual, but the implied referent isn't.
People use their conscious experiences as symbols to refer to
alleged external 'objective' objects in the physical universe.
You close your eyes, and the conscious image of the car goes away,
that's the symbol you see, but the car is still there, right?
Well no. All the guy has ever seen is his symbols for the car, his
conscious experiences, and The Proof teaches us that it is impossible to
learn with certainty about referents by looking at symbols for the
referent.
So we can look at conscious pictures of cars all day long and never
prove the car is there, because it could just be a dream, and in fact
is.
The dream is actual, the alleged referent car is merely real.
One can be certain of some things that will never prove to be
wrong, no matter how much we evolve. When one has a standard of perfect
certainty, all the other false certainties (that were never really
certain) fall away as cruft.
One should not be ashamed to find those perfect certainties and
strut them around with all one has.
Perfect certainty is a direct window into the nature of God,
because God is perfect too. Only God could have or be a perfect
certainty, so where you find a perfect certainty you have found God
gazing upon itself.
Phil you need to toss some of your relativism out the door. It
doesn't become you. We get your point about those that think they know
it all, like the meatball PhD's, who have nothing more to learn about
how the world works.
But those that claim they are certain they can't be certain of
anything, or that perfect certainties are certainly unimportant are
playing mind broke games of wind between the ears.
*CONSCIOUSNESS* EXISTS.
Electrons, neutrinos etc don't. They are virtual realities
displayed on the LCD screen of the AllMighty, luminescing in the dark of
the void for its own amusement.
The minute a conscious dream unit looks at its own conscious
symbols of physical reality, and comes to believe the implied referent
is actual, they have gone unlucid.
Homer
Phil Scott (philscott@philscott.net) wrote:
>Homer. Here is a drill you could try. Wait until a dark moonless
>night.. stand by your front door with a grocery sack in one hand...place
>the bag over yer head....step outside and start walking.
>Shortly objective reality will dawn on you or whether you are the effect or
>the cause of any collision....or if anyone else is watching or not watching
>and regardless of any language you speak.
>What you choose to lable those objects you intersect with of course is your
>choice, you can defer to the notions of others and think "you know, I think
>I just stepped in some dog shit" or you could come up with an entirely
>original notion...none the less, unless you want to stink up your house you
>will in fact have to scrape it off of your shoe before you go back
>inside....which abode will still be where you left it.
>The issue you might be willing to agree on is that all this including
>oneself is only actual from ones own viewpoint...from other viewpoints it
>may be invisible or not recognised for a wide range of reasons...say for
>instance from the viewpoint of a neutrino..the non reactive subatomic
>particle that it is, would whiz by neither being affected or disaffected by
>ones own polarized and charged context. So there are these actualities
>that remain true, even beyond thier own contextual framework..... it is a
>single context that includes the trees ...and the neutrino's....the wave
>particle context itself....
>defaulting from that, context...the wave/ particle context.... one sees
>actuality... a solid glimpse of which I think you demonstrate from time to
>time and posted on in your 'between the wings of the dichotomy' essay.
>Mixing contexts as a way to argue the validity of reality formed inside any
>given context, is imho not valid. All reality is relative to its context.
>The narrower the context, say for instance North Carolina Democrats...the
>more relative the 'truth'.
>Trees are quite real in the context of squirrels and lovers sitting in front
>of a fire on a cold night...discounting the reality and context of that is
>discounting who and what one is at the time...
>one can step outside of any of these contexts however, and while not using
>the reality born of any other context or matrix, percieve the actuality of
>another one. It is this habit you discussed briefly of using the reality
>of one context to qualify the reality of another that limits ones range of
>considerations and perception.
>One way of getting past those limitations is to see the extreme error in
>hanging onto anything you think is true, valid or useful...then obliterating
>them... and realizing that no matter how much you think you know today, even
>at the world class scientist level, that in 50 million years of evolution
>..or even in 50 more years of evolutionin some instances, it will seem
>primative and limited beyond all imagination. Understanding that and
>eliminating this rigid contextual thinking, and trying to parse reality from
>these constraints logically.... frees one to percieve actuality... broad
>band and beyond.
>Broad band reality however is not uniformly useful in screening contextual
>reality...we do in fact eat beans, fart and watch tee vee in that context to
>a large degree at least...denying that set of contextual realities is
>counter productive....as it denies the larger whole in which it rests... one
>must see the entire picture...and to do that entails not denying any part.
>Phil Scott
>Phil Scott
><homer@lightlink.com> wrote in message
>news:200311161657.LAA01194@adore.lightlink.com...
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>
>>
>> DELUSION ABOUT ILLUSION
>>
>> The primary delusion is that something exists independent
>> of what we perceive. He sees a car and thinks it is a *CAR*,
>> rather than a colorform picture of a car in his conscious unit.
>>
>> Say someone gets out of his body with full perception. Chances
>> are he will be seeing more than the usual physical universe around him.
>> This universe seems to a a composite universe, with perhaps multiple
>> universes intersecting and interacting, and higher and lower levels
>> of each universes interplaying like a layer cake.
>>
>> Without body's eyes we see the lowest layer of one of the
>> universes, the one we call the physical universe. Go exterior
>> and perhaps you start seeing higher levels of the physical universe,
>> and perhaps intersection areas of other universe.
>>
>> So say this guy goes exterior and he sees a shadowy figure off
>> in the distance through the wall etc and his first reaction is
>> "I see a Ghost!" Ok that's fine. But now he says "It *IS* a Ghost!",
>> or "It ISN'T a Ghost!" or "I'm not going to believe you are a Ghost
>> until someone else proves to me you are a Ghost!"
>>
>> This is going to dry up his perceptions. Why? Because it is
>> evaluation. He is evaluating for the experience and like evaluating
>> for a pc, it is death to the experience. He is trying to overlay a
>> frame work of *TRUTH* on this experience, its an add on, and
>> an alter-is.
>>
>> The truth is "I perceive a ghost", anything more is evaluation.
>>
>> There are people who don't want to perceive anything that isn't
>> real. Perhaps they consider it impolite to the God of Reality.
>>
>> This presumes that things exist independent of their own
>> perceptions, because if they don't, they aren't real!
>>
>> This also puts the person into the problem of determining what is
>> real or not. It's easy to determine what you perceive, if you
>> perceive it, you perceive it. But how do you determine if something
>> is 'real'?
>>
>> Unfortunately most people determine if something is real by
>> whether other people perceive it also or not. But how did THEY
>> determine it was real? It's sort of a catch 22 endless regression,
>> and what they don't realize is that ultimately reality had to start
>> with someone who said "It's real because I perceive it." That allows
>> everyone else to say "Well its ok for me to perceive it because its
>> real, and I know its real because Goober says so!"
>>
>> This is the framework upon which the science of proving reality
>> stands.
>>
>> Notice that science itself has little to do with proving the
>> reality of things, thats an alter-is twist that certain meatballs put
>> on it. The scientific method of observation, theory, prediction,
>> verification and peer revue, really has nothing to do with
>> establishing the 'reality' of anything, only the dependability of it.
>> Its a further alter-is of things that if things are dependable, they
>> must be REAL.
>>
>> Now the proof has an underlying principle that is usually left
>> out of the discussions. By far the most important line in the proof
>> is number 2.
>>
>> 2.) Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Looking at
>> Effects.
>>
>> It's simple enough to model, put a video camera out there
>> attached to a Tv screen, and look at the world through the TV screen
>> as your only mode of access. If the video camera is pointed at a red
>> car say, light waves come in and bounce off the car and head for the
>> camera lens.
>>
>> The change in the direction of the light waves records the
>> existence of an external cause out there called the red car. The car
>> is cause and it EFFECTS the light waves by causing them to bounce.
>> The light waves go to the video camera and now THEY cause the retina
>> of the camera to emit electrical signals, which travel to the TV set
>> which cause the scanning electron gun to change its intensity, which
>> causes the phosphors on the screen to light up, which causes light
>> waves to be emitted from the TV screen towwards your eyes, which
>> causes YOUR retina to emit eletronic signals to head for your brain,
>> which causes activity in the visual cortex, which causes conscious
>> picturs to appear and you see them.
>>
>> YOU end up looking at effects, namely the pictures in your
>> consciousness, in order to learn about cause, namely the car many
>> levels of cause and effect back. Notice that at no time is the video
>> camera in contact with the car out there, it is only ever in contact
>> with light waves that were caused to change course by the car. The
>> video camera doesn't even really know if the car is out there because
>> the light waves could have been bent by God to make it look like there
>> was a car out there. The video camera only knows about the effects in
>> itself and those effects do not prove cause.
>>
>> OK, so this is Learning across a Distance by Looking at Effects,
>> and does not produce certainty of cause.
>>
>> Now what's left out is a deeper analysis of why learning across a
>> distance implies learning by looking at effects.
>>
>> Here is what the proof has to say on it.
>>
>> The primary assertion is if A and B are two different objects,
>> then then only way B can learn about A is if A is cause and has an
>> effect on B. B must change state because of A in order for B to learn
>> about A.
>>
>> This implies that if A has no effect on B, then B can never learn
>> about A no matter what it does or how much cause B has on A.
>>
>> This also implies that the ONLY thing B can learn about A, is how
>> A's cause affected B, in other words the only qualities that two
>> objects can learn about each other are causal relations.
>>
>> The Proof further says if A and B are separated by a real
>> distance, then A and B are two different objects.
>>
>> So we have
>>
>> 2a.) If A and B are two different objects, then the only way B
>> can learn about A is by looking at effects in itself caused by A.
>>
>> 2b.) If A and B are separated by a distance, then A and B are two
>> different objects.
>>
>> Therefore
>>
>> If B is learning about A across a distance, then B must be
>> learning by looking at effects.
>>
>> S0 you see how 2.) is derived?
>>
>> Ok now notice that the proof says if A and B are two different
>> objects, they must learn about each other by looking at effects and
>> therefore can't have certainty of each other at all.
>>
>> Notice this is true even if A and B are NOT separated by a
>> distance. Even if A and B are on the same point, but are nonetheless
>> two different objects, they must learn by looking at effects in
>> themselves, and therefore may never enjoy certainty of each other's
>> existence or cause.
>>
>> Thus the only way for A and B to learn with certainty about each
>> other, they must be the same object!
>>
>> Since the conscious self is able to learn with certainty about
>> the existence and cause in its conscious picture color forms, one
>> therefore has to conclude that the self IS the same object as its
>> perceived color forms.
>>
>> In other words you ARE what you perceive.
>>
>> Now a meatball will start saying "Homer is saying I am a tree!"
>>
>> No, trees do not exist, only your perception of the tree exists
>> as a colorform picture in your conscious unit. Yes you are the
>> colorform when you perceive the tree, that is why you can perceive the
>> existence and cause of that colorform, because you are learning by
>> looking AT CAUSE, and not learning by looking at effects.
>>
>> Even if we believe that trees exist, its still not true that you
>> are the tree, you are however the colorform you see of the tree, even
>> though holographically the colorform looks like it is 'out there'
>> where you fancy the tree to be.
>>
>> The virtual reality theory however claims that trees do not exist
>> at all, nor does space of any kind, only colorform pictures of such in
>> the eye of each conscious unit.
>>
>> Each person has his own colorform of the tree, we aren't all
>> seeing the same physical conscious picture. The pictures may look
>> alike, but are individual pictures for each being. Each being sees
>> only his own colorforms at all times.
>>
>> Since space itself is an illusion, all observers are on the same
>> point/place, and the idea that someone else is 'over there' in your
>> picture is just plain wrong. Everyone is 'here' where you are.
>>
>> So if you take a look at Quantum Mechanics, its primary departure
>> from Newtonian mechanics is that 'what reality is' depends on the
>> process of observation itself. They say that reality doesn't really
>> exist until it is observed, and that the process of observation kind
>> of precipitates pre reality into real reality according to the process
>> of observation itself. This means that different events of
>> observation might precipitate slightly different final realities.
>>
>> Now personally I believe the quantum boys are still lost in
>> delusion about illusion, but if you take a look at what they are
>> saying in the context of the proof and the idea that the entire
>> external universe is a hologram of coloforms, then you can see where
>> it might be leading.
>>
>> The proof says that the perceiver and the perceived are one and
>> the same thing because certainty flows between them.
>>
>> The virtual reality theory says that all there is are perceivers
>> and perceiveds and that therefore things are only as real as they are
>> perceived, no more and no less.
>>
>> Thus of course the process of observation 'precipitates' reality,
>> as observation IS reality.
>>
>> Hopefully some day the Quantum Boys will wake up, and hopefully
>> we have made a few meatballs roll over in the graves they call their
>> life.
>>
>> Homer
>>
>> - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
>> (607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
>> homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
>>
>> ======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
>> Sun Nov 16 11:57:30 EST 2003
>> ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/proof29.memo
>> Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help
>>
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: 2.6.2
>>
>> iQBVAwUBP7esez4RxM7qO/z1AQFCSQIAq6kDk51ljuNARsX40uxuSeKD1OGUrJHC
>> EfRcGRKmCimV+vIXiNVBJeQZEDlRFLlYTRi3YnPLodBUQ1lOY/gfkQ==
>> =OdAK
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
- --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Wed Feb 23 12:00:02 EST 2022
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore201.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFiFmgSURT1lqxE3HERAuoeAKCtrl5S4ySgvCx2wYMgXL3yltqOmgCfTBP9
gdIU/MT+mYZ4k7ts/y8Vswg=
=xYVg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
ACTUAL vs REAL
Nah, Phil, you are wrong.
Actual means what is true.
Real means what we think is true.
Context's do not change the nature of actuality, only the nature of
reality.
The world is either a virtual reality posing as actuality, or it is
actual.
Something is actual.
But people think the car in their dreams is actual until they
wake up or go lucid in the dream.
The DREAM is actual, the conscious color form and the perceiver
of such is ALWAYS actual, but the implied referent isn't.
People use their conscious experiences as symbols to refer to
alleged external 'objective' objects in the physical universe.
You close your eyes, and the conscious image of the car goes away,
that's the symbol you see, but the car is still there, right?
Well no. All the guy has ever seen is his symbols for the car, his
conscious experiences, and The Proof teaches us that it is impossible to
learn with certainty about referents by looking at symbols for the
referent.
So we can look at conscious pictures of cars all day long and never
prove the car is there, because it could just be a dream, and in fact
is.
The dream is actual, the alleged referent car is merely real.
One can be certain of some things that will never prove to be
wrong, no matter how much we evolve. When one has a standard of perfect
certainty, all the other false certainties (that were never really
certain) fall away as cruft.
One should not be ashamed to find those perfect certainties and
strut them around with all one has.
Perfect certainty is a direct window into the nature of God,
because God is perfect too. Only God could have or be a perfect
certainty, so where you find a perfect certainty you have found God
gazing upon itself.
Phil you need to toss some of your relativism out the door. It
doesn't become you. We get your point about those that think they know
it all, like the meatball PhD's, who have nothing more to learn about
how the world works.
But those that claim they are certain they can't be certain of
anything, or that perfect certainties are certainly unimportant are
playing mind broke games of wind between the ears.
*CONSCIOUSNESS* EXISTS.
Electrons, neutrinos etc don't. They are virtual realities
displayed on the LCD screen of the AllMighty, luminescing in the dark of
the void for its own amusement.
The minute a conscious dream unit looks at its own conscious
symbols of physical reality, and comes to believe the implied referent
is actual, they have gone unlucid.
Homer
Phil Scott (philscott@philscott.net) wrote:
>Homer. Here is a drill you could try. Wait until a dark moonless
>night.. stand by your front door with a grocery sack in one hand...place
>the bag over yer head....step outside and start walking.
>Shortly objective reality will dawn on you or whether you are the effect or
>the cause of any collision....or if anyone else is watching or not watching
>and regardless of any language you speak.
>What you choose to lable those objects you intersect with of course is your
>choice, you can defer to the notions of others and think "you know, I think
>I just stepped in some dog shit" or you could come up with an entirely
>original notion...none the less, unless you want to stink up your house you
>will in fact have to scrape it off of your shoe before you go back
>inside....which abode will still be where you left it.
>The issue you might be willing to agree on is that all this including
>oneself is only actual from ones own viewpoint...from other viewpoints it
>may be invisible or not recognised for a wide range of reasons...say for
>instance from the viewpoint of a neutrino..the non reactive subatomic
>particle that it is, would whiz by neither being affected or disaffected by
>ones own polarized and charged context. So there are these actualities
>that remain true, even beyond thier own contextual framework..... it is a
>single context that includes the trees ...and the neutrino's....the wave
>particle context itself....
>defaulting from that, context...the wave/ particle context.... one sees
>actuality... a solid glimpse of which I think you demonstrate from time to
>time and posted on in your 'between the wings of the dichotomy' essay.
>Mixing contexts as a way to argue the validity of reality formed inside any
>given context, is imho not valid. All reality is relative to its context.
>The narrower the context, say for instance North Carolina Democrats...the
>more relative the 'truth'.
>Trees are quite real in the context of squirrels and lovers sitting in front
>of a fire on a cold night...discounting the reality and context of that is
>discounting who and what one is at the time...
>one can step outside of any of these contexts however, and while not using
>the reality born of any other context or matrix, percieve the actuality of
>another one. It is this habit you discussed briefly of using the reality
>of one context to qualify the reality of another that limits ones range of
>considerations and perception.
>One way of getting past those limitations is to see the extreme error in
>hanging onto anything you think is true, valid or useful...then obliterating
>them... and realizing that no matter how much you think you know today, even
>at the world class scientist level, that in 50 million years of evolution
>..or even in 50 more years of evolutionin some instances, it will seem
>primative and limited beyond all imagination. Understanding that and
>eliminating this rigid contextual thinking, and trying to parse reality from
>these constraints logically.... frees one to percieve actuality... broad
>band and beyond.
>Broad band reality however is not uniformly useful in screening contextual
>reality...we do in fact eat beans, fart and watch tee vee in that context to
>a large degree at least...denying that set of contextual realities is
>counter productive....as it denies the larger whole in which it rests... one
>must see the entire picture...and to do that entails not denying any part.
>Phil Scott
>Phil Scott
><homer@lightlink.com> wrote in message
>news:200311161657.LAA01194@adore.lightlink.com...
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>
>>
>> DELUSION ABOUT ILLUSION
>>
>> The primary delusion is that something exists independent
>> of what we perceive. He sees a car and thinks it is a *CAR*,
>> rather than a colorform picture of a car in his conscious unit.
>>
>> Say someone gets out of his body with full perception. Chances
>> are he will be seeing more than the usual physical universe around him.
>> This universe seems to a a composite universe, with perhaps multiple
>> universes intersecting and interacting, and higher and lower levels
>> of each universes interplaying like a layer cake.
>>
>> Without body's eyes we see the lowest layer of one of the
>> universes, the one we call the physical universe. Go exterior
>> and perhaps you start seeing higher levels of the physical universe,
>> and perhaps intersection areas of other universe.
>>
>> So say this guy goes exterior and he sees a shadowy figure off
>> in the distance through the wall etc and his first reaction is
>> "I see a Ghost!" Ok that's fine. But now he says "It *IS* a Ghost!",
>> or "It ISN'T a Ghost!" or "I'm not going to believe you are a Ghost
>> until someone else proves to me you are a Ghost!"
>>
>> This is going to dry up his perceptions. Why? Because it is
>> evaluation. He is evaluating for the experience and like evaluating
>> for a pc, it is death to the experience. He is trying to overlay a
>> frame work of *TRUTH* on this experience, its an add on, and
>> an alter-is.
>>
>> The truth is "I perceive a ghost", anything more is evaluation.
>>
>> There are people who don't want to perceive anything that isn't
>> real. Perhaps they consider it impolite to the God of Reality.
>>
>> This presumes that things exist independent of their own
>> perceptions, because if they don't, they aren't real!
>>
>> This also puts the person into the problem of determining what is
>> real or not. It's easy to determine what you perceive, if you
>> perceive it, you perceive it. But how do you determine if something
>> is 'real'?
>>
>> Unfortunately most people determine if something is real by
>> whether other people perceive it also or not. But how did THEY
>> determine it was real? It's sort of a catch 22 endless regression,
>> and what they don't realize is that ultimately reality had to start
>> with someone who said "It's real because I perceive it." That allows
>> everyone else to say "Well its ok for me to perceive it because its
>> real, and I know its real because Goober says so!"
>>
>> This is the framework upon which the science of proving reality
>> stands.
>>
>> Notice that science itself has little to do with proving the
>> reality of things, thats an alter-is twist that certain meatballs put
>> on it. The scientific method of observation, theory, prediction,
>> verification and peer revue, really has nothing to do with
>> establishing the 'reality' of anything, only the dependability of it.
>> Its a further alter-is of things that if things are dependable, they
>> must be REAL.
>>
>> Now the proof has an underlying principle that is usually left
>> out of the discussions. By far the most important line in the proof
>> is number 2.
>>
>> 2.) Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Looking at
>> Effects.
>>
>> It's simple enough to model, put a video camera out there
>> attached to a Tv screen, and look at the world through the TV screen
>> as your only mode of access. If the video camera is pointed at a red
>> car say, light waves come in and bounce off the car and head for the
>> camera lens.
>>
>> The change in the direction of the light waves records the
>> existence of an external cause out there called the red car. The car
>> is cause and it EFFECTS the light waves by causing them to bounce.
>> The light waves go to the video camera and now THEY cause the retina
>> of the camera to emit electrical signals, which travel to the TV set
>> which cause the scanning electron gun to change its intensity, which
>> causes the phosphors on the screen to light up, which causes light
>> waves to be emitted from the TV screen towwards your eyes, which
>> causes YOUR retina to emit eletronic signals to head for your brain,
>> which causes activity in the visual cortex, which causes conscious
>> picturs to appear and you see them.
>>
>> YOU end up looking at effects, namely the pictures in your
>> consciousness, in order to learn about cause, namely the car many
>> levels of cause and effect back. Notice that at no time is the video
>> camera in contact with the car out there, it is only ever in contact
>> with light waves that were caused to change course by the car. The
>> video camera doesn't even really know if the car is out there because
>> the light waves could have been bent by God to make it look like there
>> was a car out there. The video camera only knows about the effects in
>> itself and those effects do not prove cause.
>>
>> OK, so this is Learning across a Distance by Looking at Effects,
>> and does not produce certainty of cause.
>>
>> Now what's left out is a deeper analysis of why learning across a
>> distance implies learning by looking at effects.
>>
>> Here is what the proof has to say on it.
>>
>> The primary assertion is if A and B are two different objects,
>> then then only way B can learn about A is if A is cause and has an
>> effect on B. B must change state because of A in order for B to learn
>> about A.
>>
>> This implies that if A has no effect on B, then B can never learn
>> about A no matter what it does or how much cause B has on A.
>>
>> This also implies that the ONLY thing B can learn about A, is how
>> A's cause affected B, in other words the only qualities that two
>> objects can learn about each other are causal relations.
>>
>> The Proof further says if A and B are separated by a real
>> distance, then A and B are two different objects.
>>
>> So we have
>>
>> 2a.) If A and B are two different objects, then the only way B
>> can learn about A is by looking at effects in itself caused by A.
>>
>> 2b.) If A and B are separated by a distance, then A and B are two
>> different objects.
>>
>> Therefore
>>
>> If B is learning about A across a distance, then B must be
>> learning by looking at effects.
>>
>> S0 you see how 2.) is derived?
>>
>> Ok now notice that the proof says if A and B are two different
>> objects, they must learn about each other by looking at effects and
>> therefore can't have certainty of each other at all.
>>
>> Notice this is true even if A and B are NOT separated by a
>> distance. Even if A and B are on the same point, but are nonetheless
>> two different objects, they must learn by looking at effects in
>> themselves, and therefore may never enjoy certainty of each other's
>> existence or cause.
>>
>> Thus the only way for A and B to learn with certainty about each
>> other, they must be the same object!
>>
>> Since the conscious self is able to learn with certainty about
>> the existence and cause in its conscious picture color forms, one
>> therefore has to conclude that the self IS the same object as its
>> perceived color forms.
>>
>> In other words you ARE what you perceive.
>>
>> Now a meatball will start saying "Homer is saying I am a tree!"
>>
>> No, trees do not exist, only your perception of the tree exists
>> as a colorform picture in your conscious unit. Yes you are the
>> colorform when you perceive the tree, that is why you can perceive the
>> existence and cause of that colorform, because you are learning by
>> looking AT CAUSE, and not learning by looking at effects.
>>
>> Even if we believe that trees exist, its still not true that you
>> are the tree, you are however the colorform you see of the tree, even
>> though holographically the colorform looks like it is 'out there'
>> where you fancy the tree to be.
>>
>> The virtual reality theory however claims that trees do not exist
>> at all, nor does space of any kind, only colorform pictures of such in
>> the eye of each conscious unit.
>>
>> Each person has his own colorform of the tree, we aren't all
>> seeing the same physical conscious picture. The pictures may look
>> alike, but are individual pictures for each being. Each being sees
>> only his own colorforms at all times.
>>
>> Since space itself is an illusion, all observers are on the same
>> point/place, and the idea that someone else is 'over there' in your
>> picture is just plain wrong. Everyone is 'here' where you are.
>>
>> So if you take a look at Quantum Mechanics, its primary departure
>> from Newtonian mechanics is that 'what reality is' depends on the
>> process of observation itself. They say that reality doesn't really
>> exist until it is observed, and that the process of observation kind
>> of precipitates pre reality into real reality according to the process
>> of observation itself. This means that different events of
>> observation might precipitate slightly different final realities.
>>
>> Now personally I believe the quantum boys are still lost in
>> delusion about illusion, but if you take a look at what they are
>> saying in the context of the proof and the idea that the entire
>> external universe is a hologram of coloforms, then you can see where
>> it might be leading.
>>
>> The proof says that the perceiver and the perceived are one and
>> the same thing because certainty flows between them.
>>
>> The virtual reality theory says that all there is are perceivers
>> and perceiveds and that therefore things are only as real as they are
>> perceived, no more and no less.
>>
>> Thus of course the process of observation 'precipitates' reality,
>> as observation IS reality.
>>
>> Hopefully some day the Quantum Boys will wake up, and hopefully
>> we have made a few meatballs roll over in the graves they call their
>> life.
>>
>> Homer
>>
>> - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
>> (607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
>> homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
>>
>> ======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
>> Sun Nov 16 11:57:30 EST 2003
>> ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/proof29.memo
>> Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help
>>
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: 2.6.2
>>
>> iQBVAwUBP7esez4RxM7qO/z1AQFCSQIAq6kDk51ljuNARsX40uxuSeKD1OGUrJHC
>> EfRcGRKmCimV+vIXiNVBJeQZEDlRFLlYTRi3YnPLodBUQ1lOY/gfkQ==
>> =OdAK
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
- --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Wed Feb 23 12:00:02 EST 2022
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore201.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFiFmgSURT1lqxE3HERAuoeAKCtrl5S4ySgvCx2wYMgXL3yltqOmgCfTBP9
gdIU/MT+mYZ4k7ts/y8Vswg=
=xYVg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
adore71
GOD, MAN, WOMAN and CHILD
For Urq, who asked...
This is ADORE's view, adore.com, not necessarily mine although it
gave me a viewpoint of comparable magnitude from which to dig myself out
of my hatred for women in 1985 when Adore was first born from that
seething cauldron.
As in all things that Adore says, you must remember that Adore is a
baby (child) phase religion, a baby who had mother as most of its
problems to solve in life, who was a psychotic nut case of magnitude.
Please remember in ALL of this, that GMWC has very little to do
with human bodies, except to the degree that female phase beings are
usually better off in and will chose if possible female bodies, and male
phase beings are better off in and will chose if possible male bodies.
Phase and body sex can and does get out of sync with each other.
Thus female bodies can have serious male phase beings in them, and
male bodies can have female phase beings in them.
Also each being will have many phases in many different arenas, but
they will have one or a few major phases for their major life goals that
they consider take precedent over all other of their goals.
They will do better if their major life phase matches the sex of
the body, and will do worse if the two are badly mismatched.
Also remember that PHASES are grouped into different GRADES.
Thus you can have a man in the 4th grade and a woman in the 10th.
It is also to be noted that just because a being is born into a
family, the being's GRADE may not be the same grade as the rest of the
family, a very bright and advanced daughter may be born to a God
forsakenly stupid and low grade mother and father.
Thus in auditing a preclear, you have them spot what phase they are
in for which goal, and which grade they are in relative to others, and
then do it for all significant people in their lives.
GOD, MAN, WOMAN and CHILD
Normally when more advanced beings help less advanced beings the
lower being moves up a rung, and the higher being moves up a rung too
and so everyone advances along and maintains their position relative to
each other.
Third graders are tutored by and eventually become fourth graders,
and fourth graders become fifth graders etc.
Co-pilots are tutored by Pilots and eventually become pilots
themselves.
In the case of the human condition, there are a number of
arbitraries that must be dealt with.
The woman is being asked to do something extraordinary.
In the case of a son, she is required to raise and train a child
phase being that will one day surpass her and become a male phase being.
Thus the woman is being asked to not only accept and tolerate
possibly more advanced beings than her, but to CREATE, train, usher in,
and make sure they become more advanced than her.
When the woman is able to do this without jealousy or resentment,
and is able to fully operate in the male all of it's male phase
abilities, then she is ready to become a male phase being herself in
that same grade.
Being the mother of a male is part of passing the test of being a
mother.
Being the mother of a female is also important, but doesn't by
itself pass the test.
It can be galling when a male or god phase being is stuck in a
female body, others around them will tend to treat them as a woman phase
being which will act as a wrong indication.
Thus body sex can be damning and counter productive to the phase of
the being.
One has to ask what they are doing in that gallery, i.e. being in
a body that is physically out of sync with their spirit, and get it
handled.
During times of war, when millions of male bodies are killed,
spirits come back to find to their horror that only female bodies are
available.
The contention for bodies is very great.
Just as it is generally inappropriate for men to wear women's
clothing and women to wear children's clothing, just so is it
inappropriate for male phase beings to take on female bodies.
Such mismatches are bad for the body and its goals, and the
male phase being who is squashed by the female bodies spiritual,
mental, emotional and physical limitations or tendencies.
That said a very advanced female body can often handled the duties
and rights of a male or higher phased being.
Because there are no god bodies, the male thinks it is a god, and
thus never matures out of the arrogance and conceit that is cured by
raising a god phase being more advanced than oneself.
Children grow up to be women, but women never grow up to be men,
and men never grow up to be gods, and gods do not grow up to be children
at the next grade up, so the cycle of evolution up through the grades is
not accomplished smoothly when stuck in a human body.
Particularly when one thinks one is *MORTAL* and has only one body
and that's it bud.
Once one sees that we are eternal beings, that we have had many
bodies and will have many more, we can start to choose bodies that fit
our phase in life more appropriately.
The child and female phase beings will probably be happiest in
female bodies, and the male phase being will be happiest in male bodies.
God phase beings can probably be happy in anything.
In truth doing away with human bodies completely will really free
up the being to engage in all 4 phases properly.
ADORE AND WOMEN
Someone asked me "What's it with Adore and women Homer?"
Adore is based on a few simple catechisms that go as follows.
There is Child, Woman, Man and God, they represent the 4 phases of
development in any one grade, of any being trying to gain mastery over
any area or endeavor in that grade or sphere of control (game playing).
Adore makes a big deal out of the Master, Peer and Apprehentice
relationship. Notice this is not the Master and Slave relationship,
same word, different universe.
Each phase is an Apprehentice to the next phase up which is the
Master to the next phase earlier. It is very much a teaching learning
relationship.
CHILD PHASE - Mastery of Total Irresponsibility.
When one first enters a grade, a sphere of action and control, one is
in the child phase which operates and learns through mimicry of those more
advanced.
It takes a lot of skill to be a newbie in an area, one has to know
that there is something to learn, that one does not know, and that
others do know.
BEING ABLE TO LEARN FROM THOSE MORE LEARNED THAN YOU IS A SKILL.
People who walk into a bigger sphere of control and think there is
nothing there to learn, or that they already know it all, or that no one
else knows anything either, are usually a very big problem to
themselves.
They are irresponsible but don't know it.
They may have 'mastered' irresponsibility after a sense, but they
have not mastered RESPONSIBILITY for irresponsibility.
Responsibility here is defined as being able to take responsibility
OVER an existing scene and skillfully add your cause into it.
It is not being defined as being responsible FOR the scene which of
course at a top level everyone is responsible for everything, but at a
bottom level, the child is responsible for nothing.
The child's job is to TAKE responsibility over things already going
on, and add his cause into the scene in order to better it.
Thus it takes work to become a master at being a child phase being
in a new area of control.
If one can not seat oneself expertly in the seat of being a newbie,
then one will make more of a mess than they are worth, and will probably
be kicked out of that sphere of control by the others who have matured
enough to actually be able to study, learn and teach and thus do
something there.
Thus the child phase being is seeking mastery of total
irresponsibility, knowing one does not know, that others know, that
there is something to learn, and how to start gaining ability to take
and operate successfully personal responsibility, skill and mastery on a
gradient scale.
Being able to be an expert child in a new area is a mandatory
ability to gain if one is to succeed in life.
Their primary job is learning how to master their BODIES, or the
physical plane of existence, and develop a good sense of fair trade.
Adore makes a big deal about duties and rights, which are the basic
give and take of fair exchange. The basic catechism goes
"For every right there is a duty.
For every duty there is a right.
Rights are fair chosen exchange for fair chosen duties.
You CHOOSE and are responsible for both.
You have a right to have duties, and
You have a duty to have rights.
No one ever told it to you that way before.
Justice is a fair chosen operating balance of duties and rights."
If you want rights, insist upon duties.
If you have duties, insist upon rights.
The wise person can find the proper operating balance of duties and
rights for themselves and for others.
The Fundamental Duty is Honor.
The Fundamental Right is Dignity.
Honor is the ability to make, keep and trade fair chosen promises.
Basic promise is to Adore Operation.
Promise is always to Adore Operation.
Dignity is being the Sole Operator of yourself.
Reputation is for those who Excel in this field.
In Excelsis Deo."
When child phase beings master this, it is time for them to move on
to being woman phase beings.
Because child phase beings are also trying to attain mastery of
total irresponsibility, when they fail in this endeavor, they tend to be
irresponsible!
WOMAN PHASE - MASTERY OF DEFENSE
After a being has attained mastery of the child phase, they move
onto the woman phase which operates and learns by harmonizing with those
more advanced than her, and helping those less advanced master the child
phase and become woman phase beings themselves.
The primary ability of the woman phase being is defense of the
child phase beings under her care and support of the higher phase beings
that care for her.
"The purpose of the mother is to invent dangerous games for the
child". - Adore
It is her job to prepare the child for its own woman phase and to
pass on the male phase child at the right time to accomplished male
phase beings for real world trials of their abilities.
The primary job of the woman phase being is learning how to master
their HEARTS, or the emotional plane of existence and develop a good
sense of ART. When they master this, it is time for them to move onto
being male phase beings.
Part of their trial by fire however is raising a male phase being
through childhood into manhood without deprecating his male phase
abilities through jealousy or resentment.
A female is not a better or more improved male.
The ability to create something bigger, better and greater than
oneself indicates a mastery of granting of beingness which solves all
jealousies.
How can one be jealous of one's own creation?
Because woman phase beings are also trying to master defense, when
they fail in this endeavor, they become defensive!
MAN PHASE - MASTERY OF OFFENSE
After a being has attained mastery of the woman phase, they move
onto the man phase which operates and learns by counterpoint with others
of his own kind, and helping those less advanced master the child and
woman phases and become man phase beings themselves.
He also supports and learns from the god phase beings above him.
The woman phase being learns and operates through harmonizing, that
means picking a melody line already going on, and adding to it in a way
that enhances it. A harmony line can not stand alone, it needs and gets
its worth from a melody line that it enhances.
Co-Pilots don't generally fly alone except in emergencies.
The man phase being learns and operates through counterpoint, that
means composing a new melody line of his own which can stand on its own,
which nonetheless inter weaves properly with all the other melody lines
going on at the same time created by other male phase beings.
The child phase being is dependent for survival on the woman phase
being, more than the woman phase being is dependent on the child phase
being.
Just so the child phase + woman phase GROUP is more dependent on
the male phase being, than the male phase being is dependent on them.
Provision is a harsh task master.
One of the major differences between a woman and male phase beings
is how they handle danger.
The woman phase being with child, will protect against danger by
shoring up the defenses and trying to avoid the danger, to put herself
and her children out of reach of the danger.
The male phase being will GO OUT and seek danger to find it before
it finds him, and risk himself destroying the danger before it has a
chance to come and test the defenses of the woman with child.
The male phase being works on offense, the woman phase being works
on defense.
Since the best defense is community, the woman with child tends to
operate best with close in groups.
The male phase being on the other hand, needs to be able to work
alone, be very fast on his feet, and be able to think clearly when on
the verge of death.
The ability to invent and design solutions to danger in times of
great threat, stress or pressure is the hall mark of the male phase
being.
He works from his mind, not from his heart, or body.
The ability to endure the failure of men to provide is the hallmark
of the woman phase being.
Thus woman can endure hard times better than the man, and the man
can think more clearly in times of immediate danger than the woman can.
It should also be noted that because the number of men and women in
a community is normally the same, as the women gather together to form a
defense, their concentration goes up relative to the men who have to go
out and spread themselves thin across a widening sphere of control.
Thus men need to be able to act alone, and women need to be able to
act and get along together no matter their differences.
One presumes that a true male phase being has passed his woman
phase trials and thus is already able to act well as a team.
The woman phase being is still trying to master team work.
Adore uses the example of a community of beings being threatened by
a man eating lion that lives in a near by cave.
The women operating on defense, will build walls, put up guards,
and surround themselves at the frontier with male phase beings.
She WON'T go to the cave with her child in a papoose and try to
kill or remove the lion to a safer place.
The male phase beings will, and will do so PREEMPTIVELY even if the
lion is not yet a threat.
The woman phase being can tell their children not to go bother the
lions, and the male phase being can tell the same to the woman with
child, but no one can tell the male to hide and leave the lions alone.
The dependency between child and woman is more immediate than the
dependency between the woman with child and man. The woman will not let
the child out of her sight, the male will and must leave the child+woman
and the whole community at times.
But they are left in a compound of protection and defense.
In some animals such as the cheetah, this is completely reversed,
the male body has little to do with the protection of the child, and the
female body hides the child away while she goes out and hunts.
Bodies and phase in this case are full time out of sync naturally.
In other animals, such as the penguin, the failure of the male to
bring back food is a life and death matter for the female, who can not
leave the child, and must find another male forth with or both die.
The primary job of a male phase being is learning how to master
their MINDS, or the mental plane of existence and develop a good sense
of SCIENCE and DISCOVERY.
Notice in this society of 5 grade males, higher grade females
can easily compete in the fields of science and discovery.
However her lower grade male compatriots will probably try to shut
her down and put her out.
When the male phase being masters MIND, it is time for them to move
onto being god phase beings.
Because it is the male phase being's job to master offense, when
they fail at this endeavor, they become offensive!
GOD PHASE - Master of Total Responsibility
After a being has attained mastery of the man phase, they move onto
the god phase which operates and learns by 'new beat', and helping those
less advanced master the child, woman and man phases and become god
phase beings themselves.
The God phase being works on being able to master both sides of the
games he was just playing, and be able to design the game all over again
from the bottom to the top, and begin to design new games for himself
and others to play.
This is the New Beat.
He is not mimicking others, he is not harmonizing with others, and
he is not writing melodies that counterpoint with others, he is learning
how to do something NEW, into which others may join including himself.
It's lonely as hell being a God phase being.
When he masters this ability, there is nothing left for him in the
game he is in, and it is time for him to move into the child phase of
the next level or grade up.
He has graduated from 4th grade to 5th grade.
The primary job of a god phase being is learning how to master
their SOULS, or the causal plane of existence and develop a good sense
of CREATION. When they master this, it is time for them to move onto
being child phase beings at the next level up.
Because it is also the God phase being's job to master total
responsibility, when they fail at this endeavor, they become
'responsible' and try to control everything!
Because Adore is a baby phase religion, it didn't have much problem
with children, men or gods, it was most aware of women, and that was
where most of its problem lay.
Thus the above was designed to handle the problem it had with
women, and is colored by it.
BODIES and GOD MAN WOMAN CHILD
Trying to apply the God, Man, Woman and Child principles to humans
on earth is complicated by the fact that they have bodies that mimic
imperfectly the first three phases.
Just because someone is in a male body, doesn't mean they are a
male phase being in the primary games of their lives.
A being may also be playing many different games in life, and be in
different phases in each one.
Bodies are not necessarily handed out and chosen in a way that is
compatible with the true phase a being is in.
They *SHOULD* be, but beings tend to decay down the tone scale,
sometimes wandering randomly from male to female across many lives.
One might call this spiritual tumbleweeding.
Also spirits have so many overts as men on women and as women on
men, that for many the primary consideration on what kind of body to
take is where the spirit feels safest.
If as a man he has harmed women he will find safety AS a woman.
If as a woman he has harmed men, he will find safety as AS a man in
the next grade down.
This is downward sledding into oblivion.
Also male bodies don't get to grow up to be God bodies, and female
bodies don't get to grow up to be male bodies.
This is an *ENORMOUS* ARC break to both women and men.
It is worse for women however because she has someone lording it
over her that DOES have the qualities she seeks, thus jealousy and
resentment play an important role in her life, even an over arching role.
The male on the other hand wants to be a god, but doesn't believe
in gods, so he acts like a god anyhow with no one to keep him in line,
and no one to learn from.
The arrogance of men is the hall mark of failed men.
The vanity (in vain ness) of women is the hall mark of failed
women.
GRADES and GOD MAN WOMAN CHILD
The God, Man, Woman and Child sequence is a circle, once one
graduates out the top at the God phase level, they then become the child
phase being at the next level of game up.
That corresponds with mastering a certain area of life, and then
moving into the next bigger sphere of control where one is a newbie
again.
At first you learn to fly paper airplanes, then you learn to fly
Cessnas, then you learn to fly 747's.
A 'Grade' then consists of 4 sections of accomplishment, child,
woman, man and god.
In any one grade, one starts as child, and works up to god, and
then graduates up to the next grade.
The child learns through mimickry, and seeks mastery of total
irresponsibility.
The woman learns through harmonizing, and seeks mastery of defense.
The man learns through counterpoint, and seeks mastery of offense.
The god learns through new beat, and seeks mastery of total
responsibility.
Thus two beings can be in the same grade, but one can be a woman
phase being and the other a male phase being.
And they get married and together have a child.
In this situation, Adore would suggest that the proper relationship
between the woman and the man is one of Apprehentice and Master.
Or Co-Pilot and Pilot.
"So listen now closely Women,
your Family is a Star Ship.
A Ship of Stars, Star Captains and Star Capability.
You are Co-pilot.
Choose your Pilots wisely then,
and
Your Children will be Pilots too.
Star Drive is Operating Deliveryhood."
From ADORE.com
Same for child and woman and man and god within the same Grade.
Each is apprehentice to master, co-pilot to pilot.
Some times people marry across grades.
A woman phase being will marry a male phase being in a lower grade,
this can lead to lots of trouble and heart ache.
The man may not admit the woman is more advanced, he as a second
grader may not like being taught math by a female 3rd grader.
The woman may NEED the man to be in a lower grade to prove that
'men and women are equal', or worse 'a woman can do anything a man can
do only better'.
With that man of course she is right.
A 2nd grade male can rarely best a 3rd grade female, except by
force alone, but he might pull off seeming equal, and will usually show
up being inferior, even if stronger.
Such a woman, as a 3rd grade female, won't mind being taught math
by a 3rd grade male because males in the same grade as the woman are by
definition more advanced.
All kinds of mis relationship can take place when grades are not
matched.
In the above case the being needs a serious orientation to who and
what they are, and where they are and why.
Normally sane individuals enjoy learning from those more advanced
than they are, and teaching those less advanced.
An ability to spot oneself accurately in the ladder of advancement
is critical to this process and enjoyment.
If you are having marital troubles, try to determine which goal and
phase each partner is in, regardless of their physical body, and then
determine which grade they are in relative to each other, and you will
see the source of many of the problems.
One way to do this is to hash out the Pilot / Co-Pilot problem, for
times of emergency when agreement can not be reached.
Whose orders are obeyed?
You can't have two pilots.
Low grade women phase beings hate this, men generally understand
it.
Once people see and admit to where they are at, they can begin to
relate to each other properly, even if a 5th grade woman is married to a
2nd grade male.
The male would be honored, as long as the woman doesn't use her
higher grade to avoid relating to her own grade properly, and the male
isn't jealous of those higher grade relationships.
However more often the 5th grade female seeks a 2nd grade male as a
surrogate son, and the male allows it to happen as a surrogate mother.
Likewise a 2nd grade female will seek a 5th grade male as a
surrogate father, and the male allows it to happen as a surrogate
daughter.
Adore says that for two beings to have an optimal marriage, one
should be a woman phase being and the other a male phase being, and both
should be in the same grade.
NOTHING IS SAID ABOUT BODIES.
Thus even in gay relationships, one being will be femmeish, and one
will be maleish, and the relationship can be very happy, as long as
their grades are the same and they agree with each other.
In this optimum arrangement, the child is the passenger, the mother
is the co pilot, the father is the pilot, and god is Mission Control.
THE OVERTS OF THE WOMAN PHASE BEING
The overts of a woman phase being can result from two sources.
First is a failure to learn the lessons of the child phase being.
They get kicked upstairs into first grade so to speak when they haven't
mastered kindergarten.
Second is a failure to recognize their proper relationship to the
higher phase beings IN THE SAME GRADE, men in particular.
The first overt of the woman phase being is a failure to properly
master fair chosen duties and rights as a child phase being.
They want to have rights, but don't want to have duties.
For example, they want the right to vote, but don't want the duty
of being drafted. So they vote into power people who continue to draft
only men.
As an aside, the only way to get equal rights in this world, is in
fact to demand equal duties.
You will find that those who are trying to deny the woman equal
rights are also adamant about denying them equal duties, so women CAN'T be
in the army even if they wanted to etc.
Anyone trying to deny you duties, is actually trying to deny you
rights.
That is slowly beginning to change for women and gays, but until
any group demands and gets equal duties, they will never get equal
rights.
Sometimes, as in the case of the blacks, they get equal duties, and
STILL don't get equal rights.
But at least they have a case to stand on.
The second overt of a woman phase being is a failure to operate the
abilities in male phase beings that woman phase beings don't yet have or
are not skilled at but which they need to have the male operate for the
woman+child to survive.
The same overts apply for children and men.
The child refuses to operate in the mother the abilities the mother
has that the child needs and is dependent upon.
The woman refuses to operate in the man the abilities the man has
that the woman needs and is dependent upon.
The man refuses to operate in the god the abilities the god has
that the man needs and is dependent upon.
The god refuses to operate in the child at the next level up, the
abilities the child has that the god needs and is dependent upon.
A 4th grade child can kick a 3rd grade god's butt, the god needs to
pay attention to his and other's dependencies and abilities just like
anyone else.
Failures to correct these basic overt acts lead to falling back
down into lower grades, usually thinking one has gone up.
Adore was mostly designed around the problem of MORTAL WOMEN, women
who think they live but once and that's it.
Adore considers that most mortal women, if given the choice for
only one lifetime, would have chosen to be men, and in fact are very
jealous of men for their freedoms and abilities, and having no one
lording it over them the way women do.
The mortal woman detests her breasts, and detests that what will
come out of her body is a male son who will one day become and have what
the mother could never be or have.
She thinks "the closest I will ever get to being a male,
is to have a male son."
Boy does she hate that.
And anyone who points it out to her.
Put any female into session and ask them "OK what did you feel
about getting your tits when you were 12?"
You will find a horror bordering on eternal damnation and also
underlying cause of much breast cancer.
"Spot some no sympathy for your breasts."
"Spot some sympathy for your breasts."
The result of this mortal jealousy is a violent make wrong and put
down of the male and its abilities.
"Woman can do anything a man can do only better."
Such a woman wants to believe that men are equal to women in all
respects, that men don't have A WHOLE WARDROBE of abilities that women
do not, or they want to believe that men are actually inferior to women
and that women are better than men.
"The idea that men have something wrong with them that women don't
is something women have wrong with them that men don't." - Adore
Thus women criticize what they are jealous of, and make sure their
male sons never develop those abilities that the woman does not have,
and does not want to admit exists, or admit that she needs to have the
male operate them for her own survival.
While the low grade woman is thinking
"The only thing men got that I don't is physical strength."
the truth is everyone has 4 planes of existence.
they are Body, Heart, Mind and Soul
The man with more strength has higher amounts of ability in the
heart, mind and soul departments to help manage the physical power,
although if brought up by a low grade mother, probably won't be using
them constructively.
A male is like a motor, it can do work, and if you run the motor
without putting a load on it, it will burn out or break.
Just so men, and their abilities, NEED to have a load put on their
abilities, or else they begin to die inside.
The overt of the woman then is to deny the existence of these
abilities in men, and her need for them to be operated, and a refusal to
operate them in men.
Most of the abilities that men have are designed to help the
survival of the woman+child and to counterpoint with other men.
When women refuse to operate those abilities in their men, the men
go into atrophy and psychosis.
Men take their marching orders FROM women, it is WOMAN who tells
men how to operate those abilities to provide what the woman and child
need.
Just as the passengers tell the pilot where to fly.
Without those operating orders, men start to march to the beat of a
different drum, war.
Most mortal women will ask what abilities we are talking about, the
only thing they see men doing is making war and killing women!
They find this horrifying in the extreme.
Adore says, men fight war with each other, because men hate their
mothers, they need to assert their superiority, because their ascendancy
out of the woman phase is being denied and anti operated by the woman.
They can't kill their mothers, so they kill each other instead.
"Every monster is some mother's son.
Any mother can turn her son into a monster.
Men are monsters, how do women do it?
I mean to have something come out of your cunt, and
Not know whether it is going to rape, kill or suck blood,
Must be really something else." - Adore
Well the way they do it is by emasculating the man, making them
equal to or less than a woman, which results in a psychopathic man that
will dramatize on wrong targets for the rest of time.
Adore holds woman accountable for the outcome of her men, because
these failures are created during the child phase of the man, when women
had control and authority over them.
Failure grade women on the other hand feel they have nothing to do
with how men operate and can't for the life of them figure out how women
are clearly superior to men, but men nonetheless dominate through brute
force of will.
And intelligence :)
If all women went on strike tomorrow what would happen to the
world?
If all men went on strike tomorrow, what would happen to the world?
You can spot the failure grade woman or man easily by their fast
and glib answers to the question.
There is NOTHING more dangerous than a man raised by a jealous
mother to not out rank her when he grows up.
A man without marching orders will formulate orders of his own.
Mostly to exterminate women.
A third failure of women comes from her failure to master total
irresponsibility as a child. This results in real irresponsibility as a
woman.
She cries 'but men keep us down'. It is true, the issuance of
their wombs IS excreable, and it is the ultimate irony that women breed
their own slave masters.
Ain't Justice Sweet?
There is a benefit in it to women, an advantage to being kept down,
which is why women allow it to continue and in fact covertly inculcate
it into their sons, so it is sure to continue.
Once women find what that benefit is, the irresponsibility for
condition will blow, and women will be come free to raise decent men
that they can count upon to be leaders of women and their children, to
provide the safe space they need to raise their children, rather than
fight intergalactic wars amongst themselves just to kill off their own
mothers.
A fourth overt of the woman is not to raise her son to out rank her
one day.
She tries to be boss until the grave.
It doesn't make sense for a male phase being to take orders from a
female phase being, its just nuts and is bound to crash the plane.
We need to clarify this.
Men get their vision statement from the woman.
Men issue their own mission statement.
The male gets GENERAL orders from the woman, not specific orders.
The woman tells the male 'build a school',
not how to build it, that's the vision statement.
The men then goes about doing it.
And sometimes if the woman is nuts, even the general orders are
nuts.
The male phase being is pilot, the female phase being is co pilot,
the child phase being is the passenger.
The mother should raise her son with the direct expectation of
handing over power to him one day.
Her whole time with him should be spent making sure that he is fit
for that moment when it comes.
Although the male phase being does not take specific orders from
the woman phase being, the male phase being GETS HIS PURPOSE and thus
GENERAL orders from the child + woman group.
Child cries, woman interprets, man gets to work.
So if the woman fails to operate the male phase being's abilities
towards those purposes, the male will turn against her, overtly or
covertly, and the result will be personal or interplanetary destruction.
Don't let the sex of a being's present body on Earth confuse you to
the true phases and grades that any particular being is in.
That is low phase, low grade behavior.
"No such thing as phases and grades!"
Homer
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth and Peace. Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
For Urq, who asked...
This is ADORE's view, adore.com, not necessarily mine although it
gave me a viewpoint of comparable magnitude from which to dig myself out
of my hatred for women in 1985 when Adore was first born from that
seething cauldron.
As in all things that Adore says, you must remember that Adore is a
baby (child) phase religion, a baby who had mother as most of its
problems to solve in life, who was a psychotic nut case of magnitude.
Please remember in ALL of this, that GMWC has very little to do
with human bodies, except to the degree that female phase beings are
usually better off in and will chose if possible female bodies, and male
phase beings are better off in and will chose if possible male bodies.
Phase and body sex can and does get out of sync with each other.
Thus female bodies can have serious male phase beings in them, and
male bodies can have female phase beings in them.
Also each being will have many phases in many different arenas, but
they will have one or a few major phases for their major life goals that
they consider take precedent over all other of their goals.
They will do better if their major life phase matches the sex of
the body, and will do worse if the two are badly mismatched.
Also remember that PHASES are grouped into different GRADES.
Thus you can have a man in the 4th grade and a woman in the 10th.
It is also to be noted that just because a being is born into a
family, the being's GRADE may not be the same grade as the rest of the
family, a very bright and advanced daughter may be born to a God
forsakenly stupid and low grade mother and father.
Thus in auditing a preclear, you have them spot what phase they are
in for which goal, and which grade they are in relative to others, and
then do it for all significant people in their lives.
GOD, MAN, WOMAN and CHILD
Normally when more advanced beings help less advanced beings the
lower being moves up a rung, and the higher being moves up a rung too
and so everyone advances along and maintains their position relative to
each other.
Third graders are tutored by and eventually become fourth graders,
and fourth graders become fifth graders etc.
Co-pilots are tutored by Pilots and eventually become pilots
themselves.
In the case of the human condition, there are a number of
arbitraries that must be dealt with.
The woman is being asked to do something extraordinary.
In the case of a son, she is required to raise and train a child
phase being that will one day surpass her and become a male phase being.
Thus the woman is being asked to not only accept and tolerate
possibly more advanced beings than her, but to CREATE, train, usher in,
and make sure they become more advanced than her.
When the woman is able to do this without jealousy or resentment,
and is able to fully operate in the male all of it's male phase
abilities, then she is ready to become a male phase being herself in
that same grade.
Being the mother of a male is part of passing the test of being a
mother.
Being the mother of a female is also important, but doesn't by
itself pass the test.
It can be galling when a male or god phase being is stuck in a
female body, others around them will tend to treat them as a woman phase
being which will act as a wrong indication.
Thus body sex can be damning and counter productive to the phase of
the being.
One has to ask what they are doing in that gallery, i.e. being in
a body that is physically out of sync with their spirit, and get it
handled.
During times of war, when millions of male bodies are killed,
spirits come back to find to their horror that only female bodies are
available.
The contention for bodies is very great.
Just as it is generally inappropriate for men to wear women's
clothing and women to wear children's clothing, just so is it
inappropriate for male phase beings to take on female bodies.
Such mismatches are bad for the body and its goals, and the
male phase being who is squashed by the female bodies spiritual,
mental, emotional and physical limitations or tendencies.
That said a very advanced female body can often handled the duties
and rights of a male or higher phased being.
Because there are no god bodies, the male thinks it is a god, and
thus never matures out of the arrogance and conceit that is cured by
raising a god phase being more advanced than oneself.
Children grow up to be women, but women never grow up to be men,
and men never grow up to be gods, and gods do not grow up to be children
at the next grade up, so the cycle of evolution up through the grades is
not accomplished smoothly when stuck in a human body.
Particularly when one thinks one is *MORTAL* and has only one body
and that's it bud.
Once one sees that we are eternal beings, that we have had many
bodies and will have many more, we can start to choose bodies that fit
our phase in life more appropriately.
The child and female phase beings will probably be happiest in
female bodies, and the male phase being will be happiest in male bodies.
God phase beings can probably be happy in anything.
In truth doing away with human bodies completely will really free
up the being to engage in all 4 phases properly.
ADORE AND WOMEN
Someone asked me "What's it with Adore and women Homer?"
Adore is based on a few simple catechisms that go as follows.
There is Child, Woman, Man and God, they represent the 4 phases of
development in any one grade, of any being trying to gain mastery over
any area or endeavor in that grade or sphere of control (game playing).
Adore makes a big deal out of the Master, Peer and Apprehentice
relationship. Notice this is not the Master and Slave relationship,
same word, different universe.
Each phase is an Apprehentice to the next phase up which is the
Master to the next phase earlier. It is very much a teaching learning
relationship.
CHILD PHASE - Mastery of Total Irresponsibility.
When one first enters a grade, a sphere of action and control, one is
in the child phase which operates and learns through mimicry of those more
advanced.
It takes a lot of skill to be a newbie in an area, one has to know
that there is something to learn, that one does not know, and that
others do know.
BEING ABLE TO LEARN FROM THOSE MORE LEARNED THAN YOU IS A SKILL.
People who walk into a bigger sphere of control and think there is
nothing there to learn, or that they already know it all, or that no one
else knows anything either, are usually a very big problem to
themselves.
They are irresponsible but don't know it.
They may have 'mastered' irresponsibility after a sense, but they
have not mastered RESPONSIBILITY for irresponsibility.
Responsibility here is defined as being able to take responsibility
OVER an existing scene and skillfully add your cause into it.
It is not being defined as being responsible FOR the scene which of
course at a top level everyone is responsible for everything, but at a
bottom level, the child is responsible for nothing.
The child's job is to TAKE responsibility over things already going
on, and add his cause into the scene in order to better it.
Thus it takes work to become a master at being a child phase being
in a new area of control.
If one can not seat oneself expertly in the seat of being a newbie,
then one will make more of a mess than they are worth, and will probably
be kicked out of that sphere of control by the others who have matured
enough to actually be able to study, learn and teach and thus do
something there.
Thus the child phase being is seeking mastery of total
irresponsibility, knowing one does not know, that others know, that
there is something to learn, and how to start gaining ability to take
and operate successfully personal responsibility, skill and mastery on a
gradient scale.
Being able to be an expert child in a new area is a mandatory
ability to gain if one is to succeed in life.
Their primary job is learning how to master their BODIES, or the
physical plane of existence, and develop a good sense of fair trade.
Adore makes a big deal about duties and rights, which are the basic
give and take of fair exchange. The basic catechism goes
"For every right there is a duty.
For every duty there is a right.
Rights are fair chosen exchange for fair chosen duties.
You CHOOSE and are responsible for both.
You have a right to have duties, and
You have a duty to have rights.
No one ever told it to you that way before.
Justice is a fair chosen operating balance of duties and rights."
If you want rights, insist upon duties.
If you have duties, insist upon rights.
The wise person can find the proper operating balance of duties and
rights for themselves and for others.
The Fundamental Duty is Honor.
The Fundamental Right is Dignity.
Honor is the ability to make, keep and trade fair chosen promises.
Basic promise is to Adore Operation.
Promise is always to Adore Operation.
Dignity is being the Sole Operator of yourself.
Reputation is for those who Excel in this field.
In Excelsis Deo."
When child phase beings master this, it is time for them to move on
to being woman phase beings.
Because child phase beings are also trying to attain mastery of
total irresponsibility, when they fail in this endeavor, they tend to be
irresponsible!
WOMAN PHASE - MASTERY OF DEFENSE
After a being has attained mastery of the child phase, they move
onto the woman phase which operates and learns by harmonizing with those
more advanced than her, and helping those less advanced master the child
phase and become woman phase beings themselves.
The primary ability of the woman phase being is defense of the
child phase beings under her care and support of the higher phase beings
that care for her.
"The purpose of the mother is to invent dangerous games for the
child". - Adore
It is her job to prepare the child for its own woman phase and to
pass on the male phase child at the right time to accomplished male
phase beings for real world trials of their abilities.
The primary job of the woman phase being is learning how to master
their HEARTS, or the emotional plane of existence and develop a good
sense of ART. When they master this, it is time for them to move onto
being male phase beings.
Part of their trial by fire however is raising a male phase being
through childhood into manhood without deprecating his male phase
abilities through jealousy or resentment.
A female is not a better or more improved male.
The ability to create something bigger, better and greater than
oneself indicates a mastery of granting of beingness which solves all
jealousies.
How can one be jealous of one's own creation?
Because woman phase beings are also trying to master defense, when
they fail in this endeavor, they become defensive!
MAN PHASE - MASTERY OF OFFENSE
After a being has attained mastery of the woman phase, they move
onto the man phase which operates and learns by counterpoint with others
of his own kind, and helping those less advanced master the child and
woman phases and become man phase beings themselves.
He also supports and learns from the god phase beings above him.
The woman phase being learns and operates through harmonizing, that
means picking a melody line already going on, and adding to it in a way
that enhances it. A harmony line can not stand alone, it needs and gets
its worth from a melody line that it enhances.
Co-Pilots don't generally fly alone except in emergencies.
The man phase being learns and operates through counterpoint, that
means composing a new melody line of his own which can stand on its own,
which nonetheless inter weaves properly with all the other melody lines
going on at the same time created by other male phase beings.
The child phase being is dependent for survival on the woman phase
being, more than the woman phase being is dependent on the child phase
being.
Just so the child phase + woman phase GROUP is more dependent on
the male phase being, than the male phase being is dependent on them.
Provision is a harsh task master.
One of the major differences between a woman and male phase beings
is how they handle danger.
The woman phase being with child, will protect against danger by
shoring up the defenses and trying to avoid the danger, to put herself
and her children out of reach of the danger.
The male phase being will GO OUT and seek danger to find it before
it finds him, and risk himself destroying the danger before it has a
chance to come and test the defenses of the woman with child.
The male phase being works on offense, the woman phase being works
on defense.
Since the best defense is community, the woman with child tends to
operate best with close in groups.
The male phase being on the other hand, needs to be able to work
alone, be very fast on his feet, and be able to think clearly when on
the verge of death.
The ability to invent and design solutions to danger in times of
great threat, stress or pressure is the hall mark of the male phase
being.
He works from his mind, not from his heart, or body.
The ability to endure the failure of men to provide is the hallmark
of the woman phase being.
Thus woman can endure hard times better than the man, and the man
can think more clearly in times of immediate danger than the woman can.
It should also be noted that because the number of men and women in
a community is normally the same, as the women gather together to form a
defense, their concentration goes up relative to the men who have to go
out and spread themselves thin across a widening sphere of control.
Thus men need to be able to act alone, and women need to be able to
act and get along together no matter their differences.
One presumes that a true male phase being has passed his woman
phase trials and thus is already able to act well as a team.
The woman phase being is still trying to master team work.
Adore uses the example of a community of beings being threatened by
a man eating lion that lives in a near by cave.
The women operating on defense, will build walls, put up guards,
and surround themselves at the frontier with male phase beings.
She WON'T go to the cave with her child in a papoose and try to
kill or remove the lion to a safer place.
The male phase beings will, and will do so PREEMPTIVELY even if the
lion is not yet a threat.
The woman phase being can tell their children not to go bother the
lions, and the male phase being can tell the same to the woman with
child, but no one can tell the male to hide and leave the lions alone.
The dependency between child and woman is more immediate than the
dependency between the woman with child and man. The woman will not let
the child out of her sight, the male will and must leave the child+woman
and the whole community at times.
But they are left in a compound of protection and defense.
In some animals such as the cheetah, this is completely reversed,
the male body has little to do with the protection of the child, and the
female body hides the child away while she goes out and hunts.
Bodies and phase in this case are full time out of sync naturally.
In other animals, such as the penguin, the failure of the male to
bring back food is a life and death matter for the female, who can not
leave the child, and must find another male forth with or both die.
The primary job of a male phase being is learning how to master
their MINDS, or the mental plane of existence and develop a good sense
of SCIENCE and DISCOVERY.
Notice in this society of 5 grade males, higher grade females
can easily compete in the fields of science and discovery.
However her lower grade male compatriots will probably try to shut
her down and put her out.
When the male phase being masters MIND, it is time for them to move
onto being god phase beings.
Because it is the male phase being's job to master offense, when
they fail at this endeavor, they become offensive!
GOD PHASE - Master of Total Responsibility
After a being has attained mastery of the man phase, they move onto
the god phase which operates and learns by 'new beat', and helping those
less advanced master the child, woman and man phases and become god
phase beings themselves.
The God phase being works on being able to master both sides of the
games he was just playing, and be able to design the game all over again
from the bottom to the top, and begin to design new games for himself
and others to play.
This is the New Beat.
He is not mimicking others, he is not harmonizing with others, and
he is not writing melodies that counterpoint with others, he is learning
how to do something NEW, into which others may join including himself.
It's lonely as hell being a God phase being.
When he masters this ability, there is nothing left for him in the
game he is in, and it is time for him to move into the child phase of
the next level or grade up.
He has graduated from 4th grade to 5th grade.
The primary job of a god phase being is learning how to master
their SOULS, or the causal plane of existence and develop a good sense
of CREATION. When they master this, it is time for them to move onto
being child phase beings at the next level up.
Because it is also the God phase being's job to master total
responsibility, when they fail at this endeavor, they become
'responsible' and try to control everything!
Because Adore is a baby phase religion, it didn't have much problem
with children, men or gods, it was most aware of women, and that was
where most of its problem lay.
Thus the above was designed to handle the problem it had with
women, and is colored by it.
BODIES and GOD MAN WOMAN CHILD
Trying to apply the God, Man, Woman and Child principles to humans
on earth is complicated by the fact that they have bodies that mimic
imperfectly the first three phases.
Just because someone is in a male body, doesn't mean they are a
male phase being in the primary games of their lives.
A being may also be playing many different games in life, and be in
different phases in each one.
Bodies are not necessarily handed out and chosen in a way that is
compatible with the true phase a being is in.
They *SHOULD* be, but beings tend to decay down the tone scale,
sometimes wandering randomly from male to female across many lives.
One might call this spiritual tumbleweeding.
Also spirits have so many overts as men on women and as women on
men, that for many the primary consideration on what kind of body to
take is where the spirit feels safest.
If as a man he has harmed women he will find safety AS a woman.
If as a woman he has harmed men, he will find safety as AS a man in
the next grade down.
This is downward sledding into oblivion.
Also male bodies don't get to grow up to be God bodies, and female
bodies don't get to grow up to be male bodies.
This is an *ENORMOUS* ARC break to both women and men.
It is worse for women however because she has someone lording it
over her that DOES have the qualities she seeks, thus jealousy and
resentment play an important role in her life, even an over arching role.
The male on the other hand wants to be a god, but doesn't believe
in gods, so he acts like a god anyhow with no one to keep him in line,
and no one to learn from.
The arrogance of men is the hall mark of failed men.
The vanity (in vain ness) of women is the hall mark of failed
women.
GRADES and GOD MAN WOMAN CHILD
The God, Man, Woman and Child sequence is a circle, once one
graduates out the top at the God phase level, they then become the child
phase being at the next level of game up.
That corresponds with mastering a certain area of life, and then
moving into the next bigger sphere of control where one is a newbie
again.
At first you learn to fly paper airplanes, then you learn to fly
Cessnas, then you learn to fly 747's.
A 'Grade' then consists of 4 sections of accomplishment, child,
woman, man and god.
In any one grade, one starts as child, and works up to god, and
then graduates up to the next grade.
The child learns through mimickry, and seeks mastery of total
irresponsibility.
The woman learns through harmonizing, and seeks mastery of defense.
The man learns through counterpoint, and seeks mastery of offense.
The god learns through new beat, and seeks mastery of total
responsibility.
Thus two beings can be in the same grade, but one can be a woman
phase being and the other a male phase being.
And they get married and together have a child.
In this situation, Adore would suggest that the proper relationship
between the woman and the man is one of Apprehentice and Master.
Or Co-Pilot and Pilot.
"So listen now closely Women,
your Family is a Star Ship.
A Ship of Stars, Star Captains and Star Capability.
You are Co-pilot.
Choose your Pilots wisely then,
and
Your Children will be Pilots too.
Star Drive is Operating Deliveryhood."
From ADORE.com
Same for child and woman and man and god within the same Grade.
Each is apprehentice to master, co-pilot to pilot.
Some times people marry across grades.
A woman phase being will marry a male phase being in a lower grade,
this can lead to lots of trouble and heart ache.
The man may not admit the woman is more advanced, he as a second
grader may not like being taught math by a female 3rd grader.
The woman may NEED the man to be in a lower grade to prove that
'men and women are equal', or worse 'a woman can do anything a man can
do only better'.
With that man of course she is right.
A 2nd grade male can rarely best a 3rd grade female, except by
force alone, but he might pull off seeming equal, and will usually show
up being inferior, even if stronger.
Such a woman, as a 3rd grade female, won't mind being taught math
by a 3rd grade male because males in the same grade as the woman are by
definition more advanced.
All kinds of mis relationship can take place when grades are not
matched.
In the above case the being needs a serious orientation to who and
what they are, and where they are and why.
Normally sane individuals enjoy learning from those more advanced
than they are, and teaching those less advanced.
An ability to spot oneself accurately in the ladder of advancement
is critical to this process and enjoyment.
If you are having marital troubles, try to determine which goal and
phase each partner is in, regardless of their physical body, and then
determine which grade they are in relative to each other, and you will
see the source of many of the problems.
One way to do this is to hash out the Pilot / Co-Pilot problem, for
times of emergency when agreement can not be reached.
Whose orders are obeyed?
You can't have two pilots.
Low grade women phase beings hate this, men generally understand
it.
Once people see and admit to where they are at, they can begin to
relate to each other properly, even if a 5th grade woman is married to a
2nd grade male.
The male would be honored, as long as the woman doesn't use her
higher grade to avoid relating to her own grade properly, and the male
isn't jealous of those higher grade relationships.
However more often the 5th grade female seeks a 2nd grade male as a
surrogate son, and the male allows it to happen as a surrogate mother.
Likewise a 2nd grade female will seek a 5th grade male as a
surrogate father, and the male allows it to happen as a surrogate
daughter.
Adore says that for two beings to have an optimal marriage, one
should be a woman phase being and the other a male phase being, and both
should be in the same grade.
NOTHING IS SAID ABOUT BODIES.
Thus even in gay relationships, one being will be femmeish, and one
will be maleish, and the relationship can be very happy, as long as
their grades are the same and they agree with each other.
In this optimum arrangement, the child is the passenger, the mother
is the co pilot, the father is the pilot, and god is Mission Control.
THE OVERTS OF THE WOMAN PHASE BEING
The overts of a woman phase being can result from two sources.
First is a failure to learn the lessons of the child phase being.
They get kicked upstairs into first grade so to speak when they haven't
mastered kindergarten.
Second is a failure to recognize their proper relationship to the
higher phase beings IN THE SAME GRADE, men in particular.
The first overt of the woman phase being is a failure to properly
master fair chosen duties and rights as a child phase being.
They want to have rights, but don't want to have duties.
For example, they want the right to vote, but don't want the duty
of being drafted. So they vote into power people who continue to draft
only men.
As an aside, the only way to get equal rights in this world, is in
fact to demand equal duties.
You will find that those who are trying to deny the woman equal
rights are also adamant about denying them equal duties, so women CAN'T be
in the army even if they wanted to etc.
Anyone trying to deny you duties, is actually trying to deny you
rights.
That is slowly beginning to change for women and gays, but until
any group demands and gets equal duties, they will never get equal
rights.
Sometimes, as in the case of the blacks, they get equal duties, and
STILL don't get equal rights.
But at least they have a case to stand on.
The second overt of a woman phase being is a failure to operate the
abilities in male phase beings that woman phase beings don't yet have or
are not skilled at but which they need to have the male operate for the
woman+child to survive.
The same overts apply for children and men.
The child refuses to operate in the mother the abilities the mother
has that the child needs and is dependent upon.
The woman refuses to operate in the man the abilities the man has
that the woman needs and is dependent upon.
The man refuses to operate in the god the abilities the god has
that the man needs and is dependent upon.
The god refuses to operate in the child at the next level up, the
abilities the child has that the god needs and is dependent upon.
A 4th grade child can kick a 3rd grade god's butt, the god needs to
pay attention to his and other's dependencies and abilities just like
anyone else.
Failures to correct these basic overt acts lead to falling back
down into lower grades, usually thinking one has gone up.
Adore was mostly designed around the problem of MORTAL WOMEN, women
who think they live but once and that's it.
Adore considers that most mortal women, if given the choice for
only one lifetime, would have chosen to be men, and in fact are very
jealous of men for their freedoms and abilities, and having no one
lording it over them the way women do.
The mortal woman detests her breasts, and detests that what will
come out of her body is a male son who will one day become and have what
the mother could never be or have.
She thinks "the closest I will ever get to being a male,
is to have a male son."
Boy does she hate that.
And anyone who points it out to her.
Put any female into session and ask them "OK what did you feel
about getting your tits when you were 12?"
You will find a horror bordering on eternal damnation and also
underlying cause of much breast cancer.
"Spot some no sympathy for your breasts."
"Spot some sympathy for your breasts."
The result of this mortal jealousy is a violent make wrong and put
down of the male and its abilities.
"Woman can do anything a man can do only better."
Such a woman wants to believe that men are equal to women in all
respects, that men don't have A WHOLE WARDROBE of abilities that women
do not, or they want to believe that men are actually inferior to women
and that women are better than men.
"The idea that men have something wrong with them that women don't
is something women have wrong with them that men don't." - Adore
Thus women criticize what they are jealous of, and make sure their
male sons never develop those abilities that the woman does not have,
and does not want to admit exists, or admit that she needs to have the
male operate them for her own survival.
While the low grade woman is thinking
"The only thing men got that I don't is physical strength."
the truth is everyone has 4 planes of existence.
they are Body, Heart, Mind and Soul
The man with more strength has higher amounts of ability in the
heart, mind and soul departments to help manage the physical power,
although if brought up by a low grade mother, probably won't be using
them constructively.
A male is like a motor, it can do work, and if you run the motor
without putting a load on it, it will burn out or break.
Just so men, and their abilities, NEED to have a load put on their
abilities, or else they begin to die inside.
The overt of the woman then is to deny the existence of these
abilities in men, and her need for them to be operated, and a refusal to
operate them in men.
Most of the abilities that men have are designed to help the
survival of the woman+child and to counterpoint with other men.
When women refuse to operate those abilities in their men, the men
go into atrophy and psychosis.
Men take their marching orders FROM women, it is WOMAN who tells
men how to operate those abilities to provide what the woman and child
need.
Just as the passengers tell the pilot where to fly.
Without those operating orders, men start to march to the beat of a
different drum, war.
Most mortal women will ask what abilities we are talking about, the
only thing they see men doing is making war and killing women!
They find this horrifying in the extreme.
Adore says, men fight war with each other, because men hate their
mothers, they need to assert their superiority, because their ascendancy
out of the woman phase is being denied and anti operated by the woman.
They can't kill their mothers, so they kill each other instead.
"Every monster is some mother's son.
Any mother can turn her son into a monster.
Men are monsters, how do women do it?
I mean to have something come out of your cunt, and
Not know whether it is going to rape, kill or suck blood,
Must be really something else." - Adore
Well the way they do it is by emasculating the man, making them
equal to or less than a woman, which results in a psychopathic man that
will dramatize on wrong targets for the rest of time.
Adore holds woman accountable for the outcome of her men, because
these failures are created during the child phase of the man, when women
had control and authority over them.
Failure grade women on the other hand feel they have nothing to do
with how men operate and can't for the life of them figure out how women
are clearly superior to men, but men nonetheless dominate through brute
force of will.
And intelligence :)
If all women went on strike tomorrow what would happen to the
world?
If all men went on strike tomorrow, what would happen to the world?
You can spot the failure grade woman or man easily by their fast
and glib answers to the question.
There is NOTHING more dangerous than a man raised by a jealous
mother to not out rank her when he grows up.
A man without marching orders will formulate orders of his own.
Mostly to exterminate women.
A third failure of women comes from her failure to master total
irresponsibility as a child. This results in real irresponsibility as a
woman.
She cries 'but men keep us down'. It is true, the issuance of
their wombs IS excreable, and it is the ultimate irony that women breed
their own slave masters.
Ain't Justice Sweet?
There is a benefit in it to women, an advantage to being kept down,
which is why women allow it to continue and in fact covertly inculcate
it into their sons, so it is sure to continue.
Once women find what that benefit is, the irresponsibility for
condition will blow, and women will be come free to raise decent men
that they can count upon to be leaders of women and their children, to
provide the safe space they need to raise their children, rather than
fight intergalactic wars amongst themselves just to kill off their own
mothers.
A fourth overt of the woman is not to raise her son to out rank her
one day.
She tries to be boss until the grave.
It doesn't make sense for a male phase being to take orders from a
female phase being, its just nuts and is bound to crash the plane.
We need to clarify this.
Men get their vision statement from the woman.
Men issue their own mission statement.
The male gets GENERAL orders from the woman, not specific orders.
The woman tells the male 'build a school',
not how to build it, that's the vision statement.
The men then goes about doing it.
And sometimes if the woman is nuts, even the general orders are
nuts.
The male phase being is pilot, the female phase being is co pilot,
the child phase being is the passenger.
The mother should raise her son with the direct expectation of
handing over power to him one day.
Her whole time with him should be spent making sure that he is fit
for that moment when it comes.
Although the male phase being does not take specific orders from
the woman phase being, the male phase being GETS HIS PURPOSE and thus
GENERAL orders from the child + woman group.
Child cries, woman interprets, man gets to work.
So if the woman fails to operate the male phase being's abilities
towards those purposes, the male will turn against her, overtly or
covertly, and the result will be personal or interplanetary destruction.
Don't let the sex of a being's present body on Earth confuse you to
the true phases and grades that any particular being is in.
That is low phase, low grade behavior.
"No such thing as phases and grades!"
Homer
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth and Peace. Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Wednesday, March 2, 2022
ADORE319 (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
CONTROLLING EXPECTATIONS
A controlling expectation is a statement about the future which
is considered observational but is in fact causal.
Controlling expectations are one form of God Postulate.
The God Postulate is that condition which the pc has been most
trying to change with effort and which the pc is the most convinced he
can never change. He keeps a long record of failures to prove it.
Effort can never change the outcome of a God Postulate, only
changing one's mind can.
A God Postulate is that postulate which the preclear thinks is
true because he has observed it to be true, but which is in fact true
only because he considers it to be true.
His observation after the fact of his consideration is used as
proof that his consideration has nothing to do with it. He pretends
his consideration comes after the observation rather than before it,
and thus cements in the persistence of the postulate based on total no
responsibility for being an effect.
In otherwords he turns Looking by Knowing, into Knowing by
Looking, which is the classical form of the Consideration -
Observation flip flop.
With Looking by Knowing, one first knows (considers) then sees
(observes). This is causal.
With Knowing by Looking, one (thinks) one first sees (observes)
then knows (considers). This is being effect.
AS-IS: Knowing -> Looking, Consideration -> Observation
ALTER-IS: Looking -> Knowing, Observation -> Consideration
AS-IS is being cause, Alter-is is being effect.
Notice that Looking is BELOW Knowing on the Know to Mystery
scale, so how can Looking give rise to Knowing?
Controlling expectations are specifically God Posulates about
one's FUTURE.
He is running on an alter-is, he thinks he has observed enough
future in his past to have figured out how things are going to turn
out in his future. It's a prediction, an expectation based on
observation, rather than consideration!
His causal connection to his future escapes him.
When a preclear has located his one or more controlling
expectations, he will then see why his future has been turning out as
it has.
He will understand his causal relationship between himself and
his future. It won't be specific necessarily but it will be general
enough for him to see how he is controlling the general direction of
his future.
This is a major turning point in the preclear's existence as he
understands why he is going where he is going.
After that he can work on adjusting his controlling expectations.
Then he is no longer headed down by being an effect, but headed
up by being cause.
It is not sufficient to merely try to be cause to override being
an effect. One has to see how one HAS been cause all along, that he
has been sitting in the Seat of Sovereignty has to come home to him
with perfect certainty, then he can adjust the God Postulate to better
tune his future.
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Thu Mar 23 13:53:04 EST 2006
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sat Feb 19 12:00:04 EST 2022
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore319.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFiESIUURT1lqxE3HERAoeHAJ9vRhjGmrN98D/bsSzxsdhodKUePQCeJFh1
hxAPs8pl3hoo5sScm+R+Npo=
=oEv1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
CONTROLLING EXPECTATIONS
A controlling expectation is a statement about the future which
is considered observational but is in fact causal.
Controlling expectations are one form of God Postulate.
The God Postulate is that condition which the pc has been most
trying to change with effort and which the pc is the most convinced he
can never change. He keeps a long record of failures to prove it.
Effort can never change the outcome of a God Postulate, only
changing one's mind can.
A God Postulate is that postulate which the preclear thinks is
true because he has observed it to be true, but which is in fact true
only because he considers it to be true.
His observation after the fact of his consideration is used as
proof that his consideration has nothing to do with it. He pretends
his consideration comes after the observation rather than before it,
and thus cements in the persistence of the postulate based on total no
responsibility for being an effect.
In otherwords he turns Looking by Knowing, into Knowing by
Looking, which is the classical form of the Consideration -
Observation flip flop.
With Looking by Knowing, one first knows (considers) then sees
(observes). This is causal.
With Knowing by Looking, one (thinks) one first sees (observes)
then knows (considers). This is being effect.
AS-IS: Knowing -> Looking, Consideration -> Observation
ALTER-IS: Looking -> Knowing, Observation -> Consideration
AS-IS is being cause, Alter-is is being effect.
Notice that Looking is BELOW Knowing on the Know to Mystery
scale, so how can Looking give rise to Knowing?
Controlling expectations are specifically God Posulates about
one's FUTURE.
He is running on an alter-is, he thinks he has observed enough
future in his past to have figured out how things are going to turn
out in his future. It's a prediction, an expectation based on
observation, rather than consideration!
His causal connection to his future escapes him.
When a preclear has located his one or more controlling
expectations, he will then see why his future has been turning out as
it has.
He will understand his causal relationship between himself and
his future. It won't be specific necessarily but it will be general
enough for him to see how he is controlling the general direction of
his future.
This is a major turning point in the preclear's existence as he
understands why he is going where he is going.
After that he can work on adjusting his controlling expectations.
Then he is no longer headed down by being an effect, but headed
up by being cause.
It is not sufficient to merely try to be cause to override being
an effect. One has to see how one HAS been cause all along, that he
has been sitting in the Seat of Sovereignty has to come home to him
with perfect certainty, then he can adjust the God Postulate to better
tune his future.
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Thu Mar 23 13:53:04 EST 2006
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sat Feb 19 12:00:04 EST 2022
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore319.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFiESIUURT1lqxE3HERAoeHAJ9vRhjGmrN98D/bsSzxsdhodKUePQCeJFh1
hxAPs8pl3hoo5sScm+R+Npo=
=oEv1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
ADORE721 (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
TICK TOCK
Dicoms tick tock.
A DICOM is a Dichotomy of Comparable but Opposite Magnitude.
For example:
SOME - NO(NE)
ADORE - DETEST (ABHOR) DISDAIN DEPLORE ABOMINATE
COURAGE - COWARDICE
RESPECT - CONTEMPT
DESIRE - DON'T DESIRE
ENFORCE - INHIBIT
CREATE - DESTROY
Dicoms can be goals.
TO PUT THERE - TO NOT PUT THERE.
They can even be compound goals.
TO NOT PUT NOTHING THERE - TO NOT PUT SOMETHING THERE
TO PUT NOTHING THERE - TO PUT SOMETHING THERE
TO MAKE NOTHING OF - TO MAKE SOMETHING OF
TO NOT MAKE NOTHING OF - TO NOT MAKE SOMETHING OF
These are some examples of dicoms, there are thousands of them,
some common to every being alive, some specific to each individual.
The primary dicom is the ebb and flow of Native State:
UNMANIFEST - MANIFEST
STATIC - KINETIC
Everything else comes under those two. Probably the true top dicom
is the first one, unmanifest and manifest.
What is being manifested are dicoms, is - is not, static - kinetic
etc.
TICK TOCK
All dicoms tick tock, they flow back and forth between their
positive and negative poles.
Thus a sane being will first have his attention on something he
adores, and then this attention will move to something he abhors, often
something that is bugging something he adores, back and forth, adore,
abhor, adore, abhor.
SUPPRESSION
Beings like to suppress dicoms. It aids in persistence and thus
havingness, albeit a degraded havingness.
Well ok, from the view of native state, all persistence is
degraded havingness, and all degraded havingness is persistence.
But its all just more dicoms beating back and forth like
a clock.
TO PERSIST - TO VANISH
TO BE DO HAVE - TO NOT BE DO HAVE
But persistence is very important at the beginning of a universe
and any havingness is better than no havingness. Native State, He's
been there, done that, bought the eternal T-shirt, now he wants to have
FUN.
Apparently fun is love and terror in opposition.
A dicom is suppressed with the CDEINR scale:
Take for example, ADORE and DETEST mentioned above.
Curious about Adore - Abhor | SOME
Desire Adore - Abhor | SOME
Enforce Adore - Abhor | SOME
Inhibit Adore - Abhor | NO
NO Adore - Abhor | NO (none of)
Refuse Adore - Abhor | NO
Sub Refuse Adore - Abhor | NO
The dividing line between awareness of a dicom and unawareness is
the dividing line between Enforce and Inhibit.
We take SOME as representative of the awareness of the dicom, and
NO as representative of suppression of the dicom.
Thus at SOME adore-abhor, the being has awareness ranging from a
little to a whole lot on adoration and abhoration/abomination.
At NO adore-abhor, the being has little to no awareness of the
dicom at all.
Unfortunately the tick tocking between adore and abhor is ALSO
tick tocking between NO and SOME.
Thus we have a four way tick tock that is driving the being nuts
from its suppression.
NO ADORE - SOME ADORE
NO ABHOR - SOME ABHOR
When a dicom is suppressed, rather than motivating the being to go
out and bug the world like it is supposed to, the dicom sinks inwardly
and bugs the being instead. All manner of symptoms can arise from this,
from headaches, stuffed noses, and bad eye sight, to cancer and death
itself.
Yes cancer can be caused by eating radium too, but cancer can also
be caused by suppression of basic operating dicoms.
SYNC
The most important thing to understand about dicoms, beyond the
fact of their existence and activity, is how to run them.
As it says in Adore, Adoration is Operation, if you adore
something, operate it.
The opposite of adore is thus ex operation, an unwillingness and
refusal to operate what is abhored. Ex operation is basically crush,
when things are crushed, it is hard to operate them properly.
Primarily running a dicom means engaging in the rhythm of its
natural tick tock consciously rather than reactively or unconsciously.
If you are not there where your dicoms are already running, then
they are running you slightly out of sync as you are following their
lead, and thus you are running them in, and getting more solid about
things. Over a life time, this will result in becoming a marble.
Like listening to a real clock go tick tock, if you are there,
aware of, and present where your dicoms are already running, then you
end up running them out, and cleaning out the mass that has accumulated
around them in an effort to crush them and their tick tock out of
existence.
So the issuing of running suppressed dicoms is getting into sync
with both the tick tock of the dicom itself and the tick tock of the
suppression and unsupperssion, NO and SOME.
THE WHAT'S UP DOC RUNDOWN
In session, one finds a dicom the pc is interested in, mostly by
using the "What's up doc?" rundown.
Auditor: "What's up doc?"
PC: I love my cats to death.
The pc just gave you two fundamental dicoms, love and death.
Auditor: OK, I'd like to run love and death is that ok?
PC: You got balls.
Auditor: Ahem, boobs you mean, yes, could you please tell me the
opposites of love and death and how they might apply to your cats.
PC: Well I live in constant fear for my cat's well being, each even
has a radio collar on them, in case I have to go find their crushed body
lying on the road not yet dead somewhere.
And the opposite of death is life, I can't stand this place, it
creates all these beautiful things just to kill them off in the end. I
can't believe how morbid and sick this universe is.
Notice your pc just gave you three more dicoms, beauty, morbid and
sick.
Write them down for later, do not run now.
And the preclear says the opposite of love is fear.
(There is a deep religious issue here, should the auditor continue
to run "what's up doc?" and get more and more items until the pc has no
more, and THEN run all the items in order of presentation or read?
Or should the auditor run each item as they come up, never failing
to go back to the "Whats up doc?" question as long as more items are
available?
Some would tell you the first, but when run solo, one tends to run
everything as it presents itself, at least for a while. If they clam
up, then find more items and run them, and later come back to the first
items if they want to run some more.)
Auditor: OK, thanks for that, now I would like to run the items no
love and some love, and no death and some death. That ok with you?
PC: Yes.
So let's make this a bit simpler and just run
NO LOVE - SOME LOVE
Running items is a religion, people will do it however they feel
most comfortable. OUR religion tells us never to ask what questions
"What do you love?"
Questions of any type miss the point, and are almost always the
wrong answer until he gets a right answer if there are any. Questions
also restimulate the entire bank of trying to not know by pretending to
want to know via question asking, and lastly many questions are self
answering:
A: "What do you love?"
P: "I love asking questions!"
So our religion directs us to never ask auditing questions where
possible, but to use auditing commands instead. We are doing a touch
assist on the person's existence to make him more aware of what he is
both aware of and NOT aware of, and thus anything that touches that life
over and over again will produce results.
Our standard auditing command for all items is simply to spot it or
"Get the idea of".
"Spot NO LOVE".
"Spot SOME LOVE".
Now we have to be very clear here, NO means suppressed love or
pretended no love. It does not mean clear native state NO love where
there is NO of everything.
The way you tell the difference on the meter is normal NO love,
meaning pretended no love, will read, the needle will stop, stick and
fall, and communication and spots-it will come off the item.
True native state no love will cause the needle to float.
Thus FLOAT means really nothing there.
Stop, stick and fall means really something there pretending to be
nothing there.
The stop and stick happen the moment the preclear touches the ridge
of NO LOVE, and the fall happens when the preclear lets go a bit and
some of the steam comes off.
That's called fumaroling.
Enough fumaroling on the right items and the whole volcano will
blow.
Every time the preclear contacts a fumarole he will be just sure
this one is IT, the last one, and he runs the thing with his eyes
closed, praying to God, knowing that absolute incineration is right
around the corner.
Almost always not so, but he hears the volcano rumbling for sure.,
Once the volcano is really ready to blow, he will know it for sure
and won't be interested in fumaroles any more. He will LIFT the lid off
the volcano and MAKE it blow.
SYNC AGAIN
Now your preclear is tick tocking between no love and love.
He's got love for his cats and many other things that he knows
about, and I quite assure you he's got more love for all kinds of things
that he doesn't know about including more cats.
On the way up to native state, there is a place of blinding love
for everything, so take a look at it and know your preclear has some
auditing to do. Yes there will be places of blinding fear too, they
tend to alternate back and forth up the tone scale back to infinity.
Infinity has no problem with love or fear, and no problem finding
them.
The way to suppress a dicom that is going tick tock, is to go tick
tock out of sync with it, that is is go tock tick in sync with it.
OUT OF SYNC
DICOM Preclear DICOM Preclear
- -----------------------------------------------------------
tick tock some love no love
tock tick no love some love
tick tock some love no love
tock tick no love some love
Each cycle of the preclear being out of sync with the flows of the
dicom, builds up mass and an increasing disability to flow either love
or no love. When your preclear is unaware of dicoms or their activity,
he is pretty much continuously out of sync with them and thus sinking
and getting worse in life.
In fact you will find the preclear is doing this intentionally in
order to block out feelings of despair that he considers too oceanic to
survive.
As an auditor, your goal is to get the preclear to spot no love and
some love IN SYNC with the dicom as he is actually ticking it. In this
way the preclear becomes aware of the mechanism and stays aware of it
and with each aware operation of the dicom, prior mass built up from
suppression is released, until the whole dicom is clear without duress.
IN SYNC
DICOM Preclear DICOM Preclear
- -----------------------------------------------------------
tick tick some love some love
tock tock no love no love
tick tick some love some love
tock tock no love no love
RUNNING THE DICOM
Now one of the problem with running these dicoms, is they have been
messed up to a point where they no longer tick tock smoothly themselves.
They miss beats, they stammer, stutter, they tick tick twice in a row,
they stop, they go, etc. It is almost impossible to disrupt the rhythm
of a dicom, but your preclear has succeeded in doing so anyhow. That is
part of his goal of NO DICOM, to crush it and it's tick tock out of
existence, you see?
So as you are auditing this, you will find that your prclear is
constantly going out of sync with the dicom through no immediate fault
of his own.
THE DICOM DRIVES THE SESSION!
Not the pc nor the auditor.
Thus your session may go like this:
Auditor Preclear DICOM
- ------------------------------------------------------------
Spot a tick tick tick in sync
Spot a tock tock tock in sync
Spot a tick tick tick in sync
Spot a tock tock TICK pc grinds
Spot a tick tick TOCK pc grinds
Spot a TICK tick tick pc good to again.
Spot a tock tock tock in sync
Spot a tick tick tick in sync
Notice how the dicom ticked twice, thus throwing the preclear out
of sync. Reads stop happening, pc can't spot instances of the items, pc
says nothing there, loses interest, gets restless, loses emotion and
willingness to go on, and meter stops reading and starts to rise.
Notice how the auditor got the pc back in sync by running the same
item twice!
Understand this, the dicom is swinging onwards, regardless of what
the pc is doing, but the dicom may tick twice without tocking, it may
not swing smoothly for an instant.
So notice what the auditor has to do, remember the dicom drives the
session, the auditor and preclear MUST follow in sync.
Auditor Preclear DICOM
- -----------------------------------------------------------
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: Yak Yak Yak SOME love
Auditor 'Spot NO love' PC: Yak Yak Yak NO love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: Yak Yak Yak SOME love
Auditor 'Spot NO love' PC: Yak Yak Yak NO love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: glum NO love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: Yak Yak SOME love
Auditor 'Spot NO love' PC: Yak Yak NO love
The flows of the dicom rule the session, neither the auditor nor
the preclear can control which way the dicom goes next, not at least
until it is clear as a clear blue sky.
Sometimes, often in fact, the dicom will go totally out of control,
almost as if it is trying to outwit the auditor to get the flow right.
It may be, dicoms are infested with elemental life forms that quite have
a will of their own. But they are merely many riders on the back of the
stallion. Talk to the stallion, and the control will come back, but in
the mean time one can help bring control back merely by double calling
each item, until sync is reestablished.
Auditor Preclear DICOM
- -----------------------------------------------------------
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: Yak Yak Yak SOME love
Auditor 'Spot NO love' PC: Yak Yak Yak NO love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: glum ???? love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: glum ???? love
Auditor 'Spot NO love' PC: glum ???? love
Auditor 'Spot NO love' PC: glum ???? love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: glum NO love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: Oh yes, Yak Yak SOME love
Auditor 'Spot NO love' PC: Yak, yak NO love
This might look and sound complicated, you are trying to unwind a
guys life after all, it looks kind of like an octopus in amber, but it
does want to be run out, and it is cooperating with you as auditor and
pc to the best of its ability.
And so with a little understanding applied, the auditor can keep
the pc in sync enough to get the thing to run. As running goes on, sync
becomes easier and easier until it becomes a natural way of auditing and
living.
In particular once the preclear 'gets it' himself, he will correct
the sync of the auditor automatically, if the dicom jerks him around.
Auditor Preclear DICOM
- -----------------------------------------------------------
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: Yak Yak Yak SOME love
Auditor 'Spot NO love' PC: Yak Yak Yak NO love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: Yak Yak Yak SOME love
Auditor 'Spot NO love' PC: Yak Yak Yak NO love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: NO love yak yak NO love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: yak yak SOME love
Notice the preclear rather than going glum, realized the sync was
out, answered the command that should have been asked, and the auditor
needs to be smart enough to ask the same question AGAIN!
And the auditor doesn't ask the command again to make the preclear
wrong, or for any other reason than the dicom has ticked again to where
the command is right.
Also notice this saved the auditor one whole glum cycle.
Dicoms can go out of sync for any number of reasons, many of which
are simply the dicom's own inability to flow easily.
But a preclear can also fail to get all the data on a SOME, and the
auditor moves onto NO too fast thus leaving the pc back on SOME.
Running SOME again will fix it.
A preclear may be running faster than the auditor can keep up, thus
while running SOME, the preclear may finish and move on to answer NO
also. The auditor can SEE this happening though and then run SOME as
the next item rather than run NO which the PC just offered and
completed.
This can get to be a bit of a dance and both auditor and preclear
need to get good at not stepping on the dicom's toes.
Since the dicom has its own beat, it is not possible to make the pc
wait for the auditor's command before he gives answers, the dicom has
its own life and must be kept up with. What makes the session run is
the pc remaining in sync and reporting on the dicom, not the auditor!
The auditor is there to help the preclear when he has sticky feet
while dancing with the dicom and to keep him conscious when the flows
get heavey. But once the preclear gets good at this, the auditor has
little purpose than to receive what the preclear says, acknowledge it,
and stay out of the way.
There is a natural rhythm to the tick tocking of a dicom. It may
be 1 second or 1 minute or more.
Once the rhythm is established, and the auditor can interact with
the preclear within his rhythm time, auditing can take place very fast
on very powerful flows. Flows like rivers or molten land.
The auditor's own natural rhythm cycle on this same item may be
different than the preclears! Although the auditor is enjoined to not
have a case in session, good luck.
If the auditor and preclear have 5 seconds to get the data on a 'NO
LOVE', they had better get the data within those 5 seconds, or the dicom
will have swung the other way. Thus a slow auditor can really mess up a
preclear.
Also if the items being run are say adore and abhor, and the
preclear has those items on his auditor, it can get complicated.
At some point the preclear will have to start soloing this
material, as any auditor at all is a complication and restimulator in
the natural swing of the dicoms he is trying to run.
Particularly NO HELP and SOME HELP.
The reach for help has been and can be deadly.
Many preclears will run adore and abhor on auditing itself even
solo.
So a full session on our preclear would involve both sides of the
dicom pair:
Spot NO LOVE
Spot SOME LOVE
Spot NO Fear
Spot SOME Fear
Always run the NO item first, he already gave you the SOME, that's
how you got the item, but if no run, double call until in sync.
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Tue Feb 23 22:22:03 EST 2010
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sun Feb 13 12:00:02 EST 2022
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore721.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFiCTkVURT1lqxE3HERAjbbAJ9h6p1sLgFERD5MIimpshEw1/uU0wCgkdk8
0E/+IPfnpoXYddN7SUV84hM=
=kBZA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
TICK TOCK
Dicoms tick tock.
A DICOM is a Dichotomy of Comparable but Opposite Magnitude.
For example:
SOME - NO(NE)
ADORE - DETEST (ABHOR) DISDAIN DEPLORE ABOMINATE
COURAGE - COWARDICE
RESPECT - CONTEMPT
DESIRE - DON'T DESIRE
ENFORCE - INHIBIT
CREATE - DESTROY
Dicoms can be goals.
TO PUT THERE - TO NOT PUT THERE.
They can even be compound goals.
TO NOT PUT NOTHING THERE - TO NOT PUT SOMETHING THERE
TO PUT NOTHING THERE - TO PUT SOMETHING THERE
TO MAKE NOTHING OF - TO MAKE SOMETHING OF
TO NOT MAKE NOTHING OF - TO NOT MAKE SOMETHING OF
These are some examples of dicoms, there are thousands of them,
some common to every being alive, some specific to each individual.
The primary dicom is the ebb and flow of Native State:
UNMANIFEST - MANIFEST
STATIC - KINETIC
Everything else comes under those two. Probably the true top dicom
is the first one, unmanifest and manifest.
What is being manifested are dicoms, is - is not, static - kinetic
etc.
TICK TOCK
All dicoms tick tock, they flow back and forth between their
positive and negative poles.
Thus a sane being will first have his attention on something he
adores, and then this attention will move to something he abhors, often
something that is bugging something he adores, back and forth, adore,
abhor, adore, abhor.
SUPPRESSION
Beings like to suppress dicoms. It aids in persistence and thus
havingness, albeit a degraded havingness.
Well ok, from the view of native state, all persistence is
degraded havingness, and all degraded havingness is persistence.
But its all just more dicoms beating back and forth like
a clock.
TO PERSIST - TO VANISH
TO BE DO HAVE - TO NOT BE DO HAVE
But persistence is very important at the beginning of a universe
and any havingness is better than no havingness. Native State, He's
been there, done that, bought the eternal T-shirt, now he wants to have
FUN.
Apparently fun is love and terror in opposition.
A dicom is suppressed with the CDEINR scale:
Take for example, ADORE and DETEST mentioned above.
Curious about Adore - Abhor | SOME
Desire Adore - Abhor | SOME
Enforce Adore - Abhor | SOME
Inhibit Adore - Abhor | NO
NO Adore - Abhor | NO (none of)
Refuse Adore - Abhor | NO
Sub Refuse Adore - Abhor | NO
The dividing line between awareness of a dicom and unawareness is
the dividing line between Enforce and Inhibit.
We take SOME as representative of the awareness of the dicom, and
NO as representative of suppression of the dicom.
Thus at SOME adore-abhor, the being has awareness ranging from a
little to a whole lot on adoration and abhoration/abomination.
At NO adore-abhor, the being has little to no awareness of the
dicom at all.
Unfortunately the tick tocking between adore and abhor is ALSO
tick tocking between NO and SOME.
Thus we have a four way tick tock that is driving the being nuts
from its suppression.
NO ADORE - SOME ADORE
NO ABHOR - SOME ABHOR
When a dicom is suppressed, rather than motivating the being to go
out and bug the world like it is supposed to, the dicom sinks inwardly
and bugs the being instead. All manner of symptoms can arise from this,
from headaches, stuffed noses, and bad eye sight, to cancer and death
itself.
Yes cancer can be caused by eating radium too, but cancer can also
be caused by suppression of basic operating dicoms.
SYNC
The most important thing to understand about dicoms, beyond the
fact of their existence and activity, is how to run them.
As it says in Adore, Adoration is Operation, if you adore
something, operate it.
The opposite of adore is thus ex operation, an unwillingness and
refusal to operate what is abhored. Ex operation is basically crush,
when things are crushed, it is hard to operate them properly.
Primarily running a dicom means engaging in the rhythm of its
natural tick tock consciously rather than reactively or unconsciously.
If you are not there where your dicoms are already running, then
they are running you slightly out of sync as you are following their
lead, and thus you are running them in, and getting more solid about
things. Over a life time, this will result in becoming a marble.
Like listening to a real clock go tick tock, if you are there,
aware of, and present where your dicoms are already running, then you
end up running them out, and cleaning out the mass that has accumulated
around them in an effort to crush them and their tick tock out of
existence.
So the issuing of running suppressed dicoms is getting into sync
with both the tick tock of the dicom itself and the tick tock of the
suppression and unsupperssion, NO and SOME.
THE WHAT'S UP DOC RUNDOWN
In session, one finds a dicom the pc is interested in, mostly by
using the "What's up doc?" rundown.
Auditor: "What's up doc?"
PC: I love my cats to death.
The pc just gave you two fundamental dicoms, love and death.
Auditor: OK, I'd like to run love and death is that ok?
PC: You got balls.
Auditor: Ahem, boobs you mean, yes, could you please tell me the
opposites of love and death and how they might apply to your cats.
PC: Well I live in constant fear for my cat's well being, each even
has a radio collar on them, in case I have to go find their crushed body
lying on the road not yet dead somewhere.
And the opposite of death is life, I can't stand this place, it
creates all these beautiful things just to kill them off in the end. I
can't believe how morbid and sick this universe is.
Notice your pc just gave you three more dicoms, beauty, morbid and
sick.
Write them down for later, do not run now.
And the preclear says the opposite of love is fear.
(There is a deep religious issue here, should the auditor continue
to run "what's up doc?" and get more and more items until the pc has no
more, and THEN run all the items in order of presentation or read?
Or should the auditor run each item as they come up, never failing
to go back to the "Whats up doc?" question as long as more items are
available?
Some would tell you the first, but when run solo, one tends to run
everything as it presents itself, at least for a while. If they clam
up, then find more items and run them, and later come back to the first
items if they want to run some more.)
Auditor: OK, thanks for that, now I would like to run the items no
love and some love, and no death and some death. That ok with you?
PC: Yes.
So let's make this a bit simpler and just run
NO LOVE - SOME LOVE
Running items is a religion, people will do it however they feel
most comfortable. OUR religion tells us never to ask what questions
"What do you love?"
Questions of any type miss the point, and are almost always the
wrong answer until he gets a right answer if there are any. Questions
also restimulate the entire bank of trying to not know by pretending to
want to know via question asking, and lastly many questions are self
answering:
A: "What do you love?"
P: "I love asking questions!"
So our religion directs us to never ask auditing questions where
possible, but to use auditing commands instead. We are doing a touch
assist on the person's existence to make him more aware of what he is
both aware of and NOT aware of, and thus anything that touches that life
over and over again will produce results.
Our standard auditing command for all items is simply to spot it or
"Get the idea of".
"Spot NO LOVE".
"Spot SOME LOVE".
Now we have to be very clear here, NO means suppressed love or
pretended no love. It does not mean clear native state NO love where
there is NO of everything.
The way you tell the difference on the meter is normal NO love,
meaning pretended no love, will read, the needle will stop, stick and
fall, and communication and spots-it will come off the item.
True native state no love will cause the needle to float.
Thus FLOAT means really nothing there.
Stop, stick and fall means really something there pretending to be
nothing there.
The stop and stick happen the moment the preclear touches the ridge
of NO LOVE, and the fall happens when the preclear lets go a bit and
some of the steam comes off.
That's called fumaroling.
Enough fumaroling on the right items and the whole volcano will
blow.
Every time the preclear contacts a fumarole he will be just sure
this one is IT, the last one, and he runs the thing with his eyes
closed, praying to God, knowing that absolute incineration is right
around the corner.
Almost always not so, but he hears the volcano rumbling for sure.,
Once the volcano is really ready to blow, he will know it for sure
and won't be interested in fumaroles any more. He will LIFT the lid off
the volcano and MAKE it blow.
SYNC AGAIN
Now your preclear is tick tocking between no love and love.
He's got love for his cats and many other things that he knows
about, and I quite assure you he's got more love for all kinds of things
that he doesn't know about including more cats.
On the way up to native state, there is a place of blinding love
for everything, so take a look at it and know your preclear has some
auditing to do. Yes there will be places of blinding fear too, they
tend to alternate back and forth up the tone scale back to infinity.
Infinity has no problem with love or fear, and no problem finding
them.
The way to suppress a dicom that is going tick tock, is to go tick
tock out of sync with it, that is is go tock tick in sync with it.
OUT OF SYNC
DICOM Preclear DICOM Preclear
- -----------------------------------------------------------
tick tock some love no love
tock tick no love some love
tick tock some love no love
tock tick no love some love
Each cycle of the preclear being out of sync with the flows of the
dicom, builds up mass and an increasing disability to flow either love
or no love. When your preclear is unaware of dicoms or their activity,
he is pretty much continuously out of sync with them and thus sinking
and getting worse in life.
In fact you will find the preclear is doing this intentionally in
order to block out feelings of despair that he considers too oceanic to
survive.
As an auditor, your goal is to get the preclear to spot no love and
some love IN SYNC with the dicom as he is actually ticking it. In this
way the preclear becomes aware of the mechanism and stays aware of it
and with each aware operation of the dicom, prior mass built up from
suppression is released, until the whole dicom is clear without duress.
IN SYNC
DICOM Preclear DICOM Preclear
- -----------------------------------------------------------
tick tick some love some love
tock tock no love no love
tick tick some love some love
tock tock no love no love
RUNNING THE DICOM
Now one of the problem with running these dicoms, is they have been
messed up to a point where they no longer tick tock smoothly themselves.
They miss beats, they stammer, stutter, they tick tick twice in a row,
they stop, they go, etc. It is almost impossible to disrupt the rhythm
of a dicom, but your preclear has succeeded in doing so anyhow. That is
part of his goal of NO DICOM, to crush it and it's tick tock out of
existence, you see?
So as you are auditing this, you will find that your prclear is
constantly going out of sync with the dicom through no immediate fault
of his own.
THE DICOM DRIVES THE SESSION!
Not the pc nor the auditor.
Thus your session may go like this:
Auditor Preclear DICOM
- ------------------------------------------------------------
Spot a tick tick tick in sync
Spot a tock tock tock in sync
Spot a tick tick tick in sync
Spot a tock tock TICK pc grinds
Spot a tick tick TOCK pc grinds
Spot a TICK tick tick pc good to again.
Spot a tock tock tock in sync
Spot a tick tick tick in sync
Notice how the dicom ticked twice, thus throwing the preclear out
of sync. Reads stop happening, pc can't spot instances of the items, pc
says nothing there, loses interest, gets restless, loses emotion and
willingness to go on, and meter stops reading and starts to rise.
Notice how the auditor got the pc back in sync by running the same
item twice!
Understand this, the dicom is swinging onwards, regardless of what
the pc is doing, but the dicom may tick twice without tocking, it may
not swing smoothly for an instant.
So notice what the auditor has to do, remember the dicom drives the
session, the auditor and preclear MUST follow in sync.
Auditor Preclear DICOM
- -----------------------------------------------------------
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: Yak Yak Yak SOME love
Auditor 'Spot NO love' PC: Yak Yak Yak NO love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: Yak Yak Yak SOME love
Auditor 'Spot NO love' PC: Yak Yak Yak NO love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: glum NO love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: Yak Yak SOME love
Auditor 'Spot NO love' PC: Yak Yak NO love
The flows of the dicom rule the session, neither the auditor nor
the preclear can control which way the dicom goes next, not at least
until it is clear as a clear blue sky.
Sometimes, often in fact, the dicom will go totally out of control,
almost as if it is trying to outwit the auditor to get the flow right.
It may be, dicoms are infested with elemental life forms that quite have
a will of their own. But they are merely many riders on the back of the
stallion. Talk to the stallion, and the control will come back, but in
the mean time one can help bring control back merely by double calling
each item, until sync is reestablished.
Auditor Preclear DICOM
- -----------------------------------------------------------
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: Yak Yak Yak SOME love
Auditor 'Spot NO love' PC: Yak Yak Yak NO love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: glum ???? love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: glum ???? love
Auditor 'Spot NO love' PC: glum ???? love
Auditor 'Spot NO love' PC: glum ???? love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: glum NO love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: Oh yes, Yak Yak SOME love
Auditor 'Spot NO love' PC: Yak, yak NO love
This might look and sound complicated, you are trying to unwind a
guys life after all, it looks kind of like an octopus in amber, but it
does want to be run out, and it is cooperating with you as auditor and
pc to the best of its ability.
And so with a little understanding applied, the auditor can keep
the pc in sync enough to get the thing to run. As running goes on, sync
becomes easier and easier until it becomes a natural way of auditing and
living.
In particular once the preclear 'gets it' himself, he will correct
the sync of the auditor automatically, if the dicom jerks him around.
Auditor Preclear DICOM
- -----------------------------------------------------------
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: Yak Yak Yak SOME love
Auditor 'Spot NO love' PC: Yak Yak Yak NO love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: Yak Yak Yak SOME love
Auditor 'Spot NO love' PC: Yak Yak Yak NO love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: NO love yak yak NO love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: yak yak SOME love
Notice the preclear rather than going glum, realized the sync was
out, answered the command that should have been asked, and the auditor
needs to be smart enough to ask the same question AGAIN!
And the auditor doesn't ask the command again to make the preclear
wrong, or for any other reason than the dicom has ticked again to where
the command is right.
Also notice this saved the auditor one whole glum cycle.
Dicoms can go out of sync for any number of reasons, many of which
are simply the dicom's own inability to flow easily.
But a preclear can also fail to get all the data on a SOME, and the
auditor moves onto NO too fast thus leaving the pc back on SOME.
Running SOME again will fix it.
A preclear may be running faster than the auditor can keep up, thus
while running SOME, the preclear may finish and move on to answer NO
also. The auditor can SEE this happening though and then run SOME as
the next item rather than run NO which the PC just offered and
completed.
This can get to be a bit of a dance and both auditor and preclear
need to get good at not stepping on the dicom's toes.
Since the dicom has its own beat, it is not possible to make the pc
wait for the auditor's command before he gives answers, the dicom has
its own life and must be kept up with. What makes the session run is
the pc remaining in sync and reporting on the dicom, not the auditor!
The auditor is there to help the preclear when he has sticky feet
while dancing with the dicom and to keep him conscious when the flows
get heavey. But once the preclear gets good at this, the auditor has
little purpose than to receive what the preclear says, acknowledge it,
and stay out of the way.
There is a natural rhythm to the tick tocking of a dicom. It may
be 1 second or 1 minute or more.
Once the rhythm is established, and the auditor can interact with
the preclear within his rhythm time, auditing can take place very fast
on very powerful flows. Flows like rivers or molten land.
The auditor's own natural rhythm cycle on this same item may be
different than the preclears! Although the auditor is enjoined to not
have a case in session, good luck.
If the auditor and preclear have 5 seconds to get the data on a 'NO
LOVE', they had better get the data within those 5 seconds, or the dicom
will have swung the other way. Thus a slow auditor can really mess up a
preclear.
Also if the items being run are say adore and abhor, and the
preclear has those items on his auditor, it can get complicated.
At some point the preclear will have to start soloing this
material, as any auditor at all is a complication and restimulator in
the natural swing of the dicoms he is trying to run.
Particularly NO HELP and SOME HELP.
The reach for help has been and can be deadly.
Many preclears will run adore and abhor on auditing itself even
solo.
So a full session on our preclear would involve both sides of the
dicom pair:
Spot NO LOVE
Spot SOME LOVE
Spot NO Fear
Spot SOME Fear
Always run the NO item first, he already gave you the SOME, that's
how you got the item, but if no run, double call until in sync.
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Tue Feb 23 22:22:03 EST 2010
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sun Feb 13 12:00:02 EST 2022
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore721.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFiCTkVURT1lqxE3HERAjbbAJ9h6p1sLgFERD5MIimpshEw1/uU0wCgkdk8
0E/+IPfnpoXYddN7SUV84hM=
=kBZA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)