GETTING BETTER
God's first thought upon waking up from native state was "This is
too good to be true."
He's been worried about it ever since.
The real hidden standard is: can you face your future with
assuredness, aplomb, equanimity, poise, eternal good humor, honor,
dignity, self possession, and peace?
Can you face your eternal future without fear or worry, or hatred
or anger, and without whistling past the graveyard?
Can you even conceive of 'my future is endlessly beautiful'?
With everyone else hanging on their crosses begging to die?
The guy who has a problem with getting better probably has a
problem with BEING better.
You see?
He is worried about not being worried any more.
That scares the hell out of him.
How human is that?
He worries that perhaps you can have too much peace.
He considers that he lost his sovereignty, but he can't recompose a
sovereign intent to lose his sovereignty, if only for a while.
He is not sure he WANTS to.
That's too much power, being able to all your power on purpose.
WANT SOVEREIGNTY AND DON'T WANT SOVEREIGNTY.
The purpose of sovereignty is to create whiles of non sovereignty.
But he forgets he did it, that he chose to forget that he chose to
forget.
Thus he considers something or someone else CAUSED him to lose his
sovereignty, which puts him at effect.
This creates an ARC break with being an effect, rather than a love
affair, and thus also an ARC break with cause, namely the other cause
that put him at detested effect. He considers that he didn't choose,
that he didn't consider, that his consderations are not cause.
That IS non sovereignty, even if its only an apparency.
But it is an apparency that can only be vanished by recomposing the
sovereign intent to create the apparency.
The way in is the way out.
But what human can recompose the intent to become human?
No human would become human willfully.
A God might, for a while, but not a human.
He finally gets STUCK at fear of worsening and being an effect
because of his intent to return in like kind to the one he considers put
him here at effect in the first place.
He is trying to make what caused him to be an effect into an effect
itself, to punish, teach a lesson, or to just get rid of FOREVER AND
EVER AMEN, and that dramatization to make another cause into an effect,
is enough to cement into place his postulate that he is in fact an
effect of a cause greater than he is.
He wants to be a cause greater than it to make it into an effect,
and failing that he becomes just sure it is a cause greater than he is.
The more forever he wants to make this other cause into an effect,
the more forever he remains an effect due to his own postulate that he
IS an effect of another cause, hates it, and must DO something about it.
He just couldn't ever forgive and let the revenge go, you see?
Thus hells last exactly as long as people dramatize forevers and
nevers.
Then he figures, should he ever regain his sovereignty back again,
by hook or by crook, and considering the auditor in front of him,
probably by accident, there will still be his original opponent, his
Nemesis One, ready to kick him back into the abyss again.
What good is freedom if there is something freer and bigger than
you are who will just make you unfree again, like it did the first time.
What good is getting out of prison, if they just catch you put you
back again, this time under closer guard, perhaps never to get out
again.
Better to stay in prison, bide your time, until you know for sure
if you break out, that you can stay out.
It's a good game for a God become human, to imprison forever,
and to escape prison forever.
But he can't even remember WHY he is in prison, he has lost the
context of his existence as a precious, fragile and unique human being,
living in a meat grinder called Killer Pit, and he knows he has no hope
of returning to freedom without recreating fully that context that got
him into prison in the first place, and somewhere, somehow changing his
mind along the way about going the distance with the program to do him
in forever.
Surely he could have changed the course of things somewhere back
there, eh?
If only he could find it, he could change it now, rewrite history
from that point on and become free of of its encrusted consequences.
In the meanwhle, he has mustered up a lot of power, energy and
force over the matter of escape and defense once he is out, preparing
and trying to fight that which 'put him at effect'.
Thus his concept of regaining his sovereignty is a little like
busting out of jail, better to be armed to the teeth when he breaks out
and firing away, in case the jail is surrounded by guards ready to throw
him back in.
Sovereignty is the ability to create power or not at will, that IS
power and ability.
So he has all this power and fight mocked up about having lost his
sovereignty and now he is armed to the teeth with more power and fight
to shoot his opponent should he break free, lest his opponent have a
moment's free thought to jail him again.
He thinks he doesn't know WHAT jailed him the first time, so he
figures he will need time to figure it out, take it all in, once he is
out of jail.
He feels he can't get reoriented to where and how he is until he is
out and can remember again or at least look at where and how he is.
"Oh right, Devil's Island on Earth, Jesus how could I forget."
He's gotta look around him, see if he even recognizes the land
scape, what jail he is in etc, just a microsecond or two, but that's too
much time if the opponent is watching and well armed you see? I mean he
lost the last time around, he's in jail now right? Just so, he figures
this opponent is bigger and faster than him and WAITING for him to break
out, with an eye on him 24x7.
This is in part why people don't exteriorize easily they don't
dare, and once they do, the go right back into prison and slam the hole
behind them, so they can't get out again by accident, until they are
damn well ready.
This is of course entirely insane as insanity is the effort to stop
what you consider you didn't start.
He feels no slightest point of responsibility for being in prison,
whether he 'deserved' it or not, and no slightest point of
responsibility for having CHOSEN to forget the where, how and why of his
present predicament.
How can sovereignty lose sovereignty through anything except
sovereignty?
And more importantly, how can sovereignty cause the persisting
APPARENCY of non sovereignty, for in truth sovereignty can not be lost,
only hidden to awareness under a refusal to operate it and grant it
beingness.
Thus Justice reigns at all times, because Justice is you get
what you postulate.
So how and why does a being postulate that he doesn't get what he
postulates and thus injustice reigns at all times.
No one caused him to lose his sovereignty, he CHOSE, and not under
duress, nor a power fight, nor anything at all, it was in fact a quiet
choice made in the middle of the void, no fan fare, no fireworks, no
nothing actually, he just kind of slid into non sovereignty on purpose,
like a drag racer puts his car into first and lazy's out onto the
circuit, where suddenly and apparently forever more, he has to floor it
to keep out of the way of the bullets.
And this is the way he will regain his sovereignty believe it or
not, no WOW, no marvel, no surprise, no delight, no gratefullness, no
thankyous, no kudos, just a quiet choice to undo a quiet choice.
Full responsibility for condition knows no thankyou, it is smug as
hell, even responsibility for irresponsibility. Once awareness of
responsibility is regained, unspeakable composure comes with it.
Take the car out of first and put it into neutral and let it coast
to an eternal standstill.
"Sovereignty is perfectly happy, alone, forever and beyond
thankyou.
The law of Saviors is,
If you are grateful for having been saved, you aren't."
From Adore.
Now that is poise, self possession, and self esteem at the top.
If he messes up clutching the transition back to sovereignty he
may laugh his head off for a month, but that's a red tag.
Back to Qual, learn how to operate the clutch smoothly, in and out
of sovereignty.
"I am forever." -> "Gulp, who made me and why?" -> "I am forever"
Skill and eternal WILLINGESS in that cycle is a fully operational
Operating Thetan.
E/P: Peace hidden by fun and terror.
Homer
Thu Aug 6 01:02:25 EDT 2015
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Thursday, August 6, 2015
GETTING BETTER
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
GETTING BETTER
God's first thought upon waking up from native state was "This is
too good to be true."
He's been worried about it ever since.
The real hidden standard is: can you face your future with
assuredness, aplomb, equanimity, poise, eternal good humor, honor,
dignity, self possession, and peace?
Can you face your eternal future without fear or worry, or hatred
or anger, and without whistling past the graveyard?
Can you even conceive of 'my future is endlessly beautiful'?
With everyone else hanging on their crosses begging to die?
The guy who has a problem with getting better probably has a
problem with BEING better.
You see?
He is worried about not being worried any more.
That scares the hell out of him.
How human is that?
He worries that perhaps you can have too much peace.
He considers that he lost his sovereignty, but he can't recompose a
sovereign intent to lose his sovereignty, if only for a while.
He is not sure he WANTS to.
That's too much power, being able to all your power on purpose.
WANT SOVEREIGNTY AND DON'T WANT SOVEREIGNTY.
The purpose of sovereignty is to create whiles of non sovereignty.
But he forgets he did it, that he chose to forget that he chose to
forget.
Thus he considers something or someone else CAUSED him to lose his
sovereignty, which puts him at effect.
This creates an ARC break with being an effect, rather than a love
affair, and thus also an ARC break with cause, namely the other cause
that put him at detested effect. He considers that he didn't choose,
that he didn't consider, that his consderations are not cause.
That IS non sovereignty, even if its only an apparency.
But it is an apparency that can only be vanished by recomposing the
sovereign intent to create the apparency.
The way in is the way out.
But what human can recompose the intent to become human?
No human would become human willfully.
A God might, for a while, but not a human.
He finally gets STUCK at fear of worsening and being an effect
because of his intent to return in like kind to the one he considers put
him here at effect in the first place.
He is trying to make what caused him to be an effect into an effect
itself, to punish, teach a lesson, or to just get rid of FOREVER AND
EVER AMEN, and that dramatization to make another cause into an effect,
is enough to cement into place his postulate that he is in fact an
effect of a cause greater than he is.
He wants to be a cause greater than it to make it into an effect,
and failing that he becomes just sure it is a cause greater than he is.
The more forever he wants to make this other cause into an effect,
the more forever he remains an effect due to his own postulate that he
IS an effect of another cause, hates it, and must DO something about it.
He just couldn't ever forgive and let the revenge go, you see?
Thus hells last exactly as long as people dramatize forevers and
nevers.
Then he figures, should he ever regain his sovereignty back again,
by hook or by crook, and considering the auditor in front of him,
probably by accident, there will still be his original opponent, his
Nemesis One, ready to kick him back into the abyss again.
What good is freedom if there is something freer and bigger than
you are who will just make you unfree again, like it did the first time.
What good is getting out of prison, if they just catch you put you
back again, this time under closer guard, perhaps never to get out
again.
Better to stay in prison, bide your time, until you know for sure
if you break out, that you can stay out.
It's a good game for a God become human, to imprison forever,
and to escape prison forever.
But he can't even remember WHY he is in prison, he has lost the
context of his existence as a precious, fragile and unique human being,
living in a meat grinder called Killer Pit, and he knows he has no hope
of returning to freedom without recreating fully that context that got
him into prison in the first place, and somewhere, somehow changing his
mind along the way about going the distance with the program to do him
in forever.
Surely he could have changed the course of things somewhere back
there, eh?
If only he could find it, he could change it now, rewrite history
from that point on and become free of of its encrusted consequences.
In the meanwhle, he has mustered up a lot of power, energy and
force over the matter of escape and defense once he is out, preparing
and trying to fight that which 'put him at effect'.
Thus his concept of regaining his sovereignty is a little like
busting out of jail, better to be armed to the teeth when he breaks out
and firing away, in case the jail is surrounded by guards ready to throw
him back in.
Sovereignty is the ability to create power or not at will, that IS
power and ability.
So he has all this power and fight mocked up about having lost his
sovereignty and now he is armed to the teeth with more power and fight
to shoot his opponent should he break free, lest his opponent have a
moment's free thought to jail him again.
He thinks he doesn't know WHAT jailed him the first time, so he
figures he will need time to figure it out, take it all in, once he is
out of jail.
He feels he can't get reoriented to where and how he is until he is
out and can remember again or at least look at where and how he is.
"Oh right, Devil's Island on Earth, Jesus how could I forget."
He's gotta look around him, see if he even recognizes the land
scape, what jail he is in etc, just a microsecond or two, but that's too
much time if the opponent is watching and well armed you see? I mean he
lost the last time around, he's in jail now right? Just so, he figures
this opponent is bigger and faster than him and WAITING for him to break
out, with an eye on him 24x7.
This is in part why people don't exteriorize easily they don't
dare, and once they do, the go right back into prison and slam the hole
behind them, so they can't get out again by accident, until they are
damn well ready.
This is of course entirely insane as insanity is the effort to stop
what you consider you didn't start.
He feels no slightest point of responsibility for being in prison,
whether he 'deserved' it or not, and no slightest point of
responsibility for having CHOSEN to forget the where, how and why of his
present predicament.
How can sovereignty lose sovereignty through anything except
sovereignty?
And more importantly, how can sovereignty cause the persisting
APPARENCY of non sovereignty, for in truth sovereignty can not be lost,
only hidden to awareness under a refusal to operate it and grant it
beingness.
Thus Justice reigns at all times, because Justice is you get
what you postulate.
So how and why does a being postulate that he doesn't get what he
postulates and thus injustice reigns at all times.
No one caused him to lose his sovereignty, he CHOSE, and not under
duress, nor a power fight, nor anything at all, it was in fact a quiet
choice made in the middle of the void, no fan fare, no fireworks, no
nothing actually, he just kind of slid into non sovereignty on purpose,
like a drag racer puts his car into first and lazy's out onto the
circuit, where suddenly and apparently forever more, he has to floor it
to keep out of the way of the bullets.
And this is the way he will regain his sovereignty believe it or
not, no WOW, no marvel, no surprise, no delight, no gratefullness, no
thankyous, no kudos, just a quiet choice to undo a quiet choice.
Full responsibility for condition knows no thankyou, it is smug as
hell, even responsibility for irresponsibility. Once awareness of
responsibility is regained, unspeakable composure comes with it.
Take the car out of first and put it into neutral and let it coast
to an eternal standstill.
"Sovereignty is perfectly happy, alone, forever and beyond
thankyou.
The law of Saviors is,
If you are grateful for having been saved, you aren't."
From Adore.
Now that is poise, self possession, and self esteem at the top.
If he messes up clutching the transition back to sovereignty he
may laugh his head off for a month, but that's a red tag.
Back to Qual, learn how to operate the clutch smoothly, in and out
of sovereignty.
"I am forever." -> "Gulp, who made me and why?" -> "I am forever"
Skill and eternal WILLINGESS in that cycle is a fully operational
Operating Thetan.
E/P: Peace hidden by fun and terror.
Homer
======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Thu Aug 6 01:02:25 EDT 2015
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore430.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFVwupiURT1lqxE3HERAmW7AJ0W7U+nAHDpcCyNrDZ2VSsJcQFP8ACgqGX2
kiza8+4zmcUl+rXw303yvLc=
=Pn0z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
GETTING BETTER
God's first thought upon waking up from native state was "This is
too good to be true."
He's been worried about it ever since.
The real hidden standard is: can you face your future with
assuredness, aplomb, equanimity, poise, eternal good humor, honor,
dignity, self possession, and peace?
Can you face your eternal future without fear or worry, or hatred
or anger, and without whistling past the graveyard?
Can you even conceive of 'my future is endlessly beautiful'?
With everyone else hanging on their crosses begging to die?
The guy who has a problem with getting better probably has a
problem with BEING better.
You see?
He is worried about not being worried any more.
That scares the hell out of him.
How human is that?
He worries that perhaps you can have too much peace.
He considers that he lost his sovereignty, but he can't recompose a
sovereign intent to lose his sovereignty, if only for a while.
He is not sure he WANTS to.
That's too much power, being able to all your power on purpose.
WANT SOVEREIGNTY AND DON'T WANT SOVEREIGNTY.
The purpose of sovereignty is to create whiles of non sovereignty.
But he forgets he did it, that he chose to forget that he chose to
forget.
Thus he considers something or someone else CAUSED him to lose his
sovereignty, which puts him at effect.
This creates an ARC break with being an effect, rather than a love
affair, and thus also an ARC break with cause, namely the other cause
that put him at detested effect. He considers that he didn't choose,
that he didn't consider, that his consderations are not cause.
That IS non sovereignty, even if its only an apparency.
But it is an apparency that can only be vanished by recomposing the
sovereign intent to create the apparency.
The way in is the way out.
But what human can recompose the intent to become human?
No human would become human willfully.
A God might, for a while, but not a human.
He finally gets STUCK at fear of worsening and being an effect
because of his intent to return in like kind to the one he considers put
him here at effect in the first place.
He is trying to make what caused him to be an effect into an effect
itself, to punish, teach a lesson, or to just get rid of FOREVER AND
EVER AMEN, and that dramatization to make another cause into an effect,
is enough to cement into place his postulate that he is in fact an
effect of a cause greater than he is.
He wants to be a cause greater than it to make it into an effect,
and failing that he becomes just sure it is a cause greater than he is.
The more forever he wants to make this other cause into an effect,
the more forever he remains an effect due to his own postulate that he
IS an effect of another cause, hates it, and must DO something about it.
He just couldn't ever forgive and let the revenge go, you see?
Thus hells last exactly as long as people dramatize forevers and
nevers.
Then he figures, should he ever regain his sovereignty back again,
by hook or by crook, and considering the auditor in front of him,
probably by accident, there will still be his original opponent, his
Nemesis One, ready to kick him back into the abyss again.
What good is freedom if there is something freer and bigger than
you are who will just make you unfree again, like it did the first time.
What good is getting out of prison, if they just catch you put you
back again, this time under closer guard, perhaps never to get out
again.
Better to stay in prison, bide your time, until you know for sure
if you break out, that you can stay out.
It's a good game for a God become human, to imprison forever,
and to escape prison forever.
But he can't even remember WHY he is in prison, he has lost the
context of his existence as a precious, fragile and unique human being,
living in a meat grinder called Killer Pit, and he knows he has no hope
of returning to freedom without recreating fully that context that got
him into prison in the first place, and somewhere, somehow changing his
mind along the way about going the distance with the program to do him
in forever.
Surely he could have changed the course of things somewhere back
there, eh?
If only he could find it, he could change it now, rewrite history
from that point on and become free of of its encrusted consequences.
In the meanwhle, he has mustered up a lot of power, energy and
force over the matter of escape and defense once he is out, preparing
and trying to fight that which 'put him at effect'.
Thus his concept of regaining his sovereignty is a little like
busting out of jail, better to be armed to the teeth when he breaks out
and firing away, in case the jail is surrounded by guards ready to throw
him back in.
Sovereignty is the ability to create power or not at will, that IS
power and ability.
So he has all this power and fight mocked up about having lost his
sovereignty and now he is armed to the teeth with more power and fight
to shoot his opponent should he break free, lest his opponent have a
moment's free thought to jail him again.
He thinks he doesn't know WHAT jailed him the first time, so he
figures he will need time to figure it out, take it all in, once he is
out of jail.
He feels he can't get reoriented to where and how he is until he is
out and can remember again or at least look at where and how he is.
"Oh right, Devil's Island on Earth, Jesus how could I forget."
He's gotta look around him, see if he even recognizes the land
scape, what jail he is in etc, just a microsecond or two, but that's too
much time if the opponent is watching and well armed you see? I mean he
lost the last time around, he's in jail now right? Just so, he figures
this opponent is bigger and faster than him and WAITING for him to break
out, with an eye on him 24x7.
This is in part why people don't exteriorize easily they don't
dare, and once they do, the go right back into prison and slam the hole
behind them, so they can't get out again by accident, until they are
damn well ready.
This is of course entirely insane as insanity is the effort to stop
what you consider you didn't start.
He feels no slightest point of responsibility for being in prison,
whether he 'deserved' it or not, and no slightest point of
responsibility for having CHOSEN to forget the where, how and why of his
present predicament.
How can sovereignty lose sovereignty through anything except
sovereignty?
And more importantly, how can sovereignty cause the persisting
APPARENCY of non sovereignty, for in truth sovereignty can not be lost,
only hidden to awareness under a refusal to operate it and grant it
beingness.
Thus Justice reigns at all times, because Justice is you get
what you postulate.
So how and why does a being postulate that he doesn't get what he
postulates and thus injustice reigns at all times.
No one caused him to lose his sovereignty, he CHOSE, and not under
duress, nor a power fight, nor anything at all, it was in fact a quiet
choice made in the middle of the void, no fan fare, no fireworks, no
nothing actually, he just kind of slid into non sovereignty on purpose,
like a drag racer puts his car into first and lazy's out onto the
circuit, where suddenly and apparently forever more, he has to floor it
to keep out of the way of the bullets.
And this is the way he will regain his sovereignty believe it or
not, no WOW, no marvel, no surprise, no delight, no gratefullness, no
thankyous, no kudos, just a quiet choice to undo a quiet choice.
Full responsibility for condition knows no thankyou, it is smug as
hell, even responsibility for irresponsibility. Once awareness of
responsibility is regained, unspeakable composure comes with it.
Take the car out of first and put it into neutral and let it coast
to an eternal standstill.
"Sovereignty is perfectly happy, alone, forever and beyond
thankyou.
The law of Saviors is,
If you are grateful for having been saved, you aren't."
From Adore.
Now that is poise, self possession, and self esteem at the top.
If he messes up clutching the transition back to sovereignty he
may laugh his head off for a month, but that's a red tag.
Back to Qual, learn how to operate the clutch smoothly, in and out
of sovereignty.
"I am forever." -> "Gulp, who made me and why?" -> "I am forever"
Skill and eternal WILLINGESS in that cycle is a fully operational
Operating Thetan.
E/P: Peace hidden by fun and terror.
Homer
======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Thu Aug 6 01:02:25 EDT 2015
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore430.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFVwupiURT1lqxE3HERAmW7AJ0W7U+nAHDpcCyNrDZ2VSsJcQFP8ACgqGX2
kiza8+4zmcUl+rXw303yvLc=
=Pn0z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Wednesday, August 5, 2015
COPS AND THE CONSTITUTION
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
COPS AND THE CONSTITUTION
Do not look to a cop to understand constitutional issues.
Cops work for the government who filters out those who can.
The government is fundamentally anti constitutional, they are
interested only in their own security and persistence through financial
gain and power for its own sake.
Thus the only part of 'constitution' the government understands is
a police state.
That makes cops feel warm and fuzzy inside because it implies job
security as long as they obey orders without question and gives them
their license to violence which they crave so deeply.
The government will claim that they need to protect and serve
themselves, at your expense and collateral damage, in order to protect and
serve you.
Thus we have peace and security through silence and compliance,
which is a corrupt government's one and only modus operandi for
appearing to serve the people when in fact it is serving itself at the
expense of the people.
At some point, when the people begin to question the government and
its level of collateral damage to person, property and rights, and
alternative governments begin to vie for attention promising less
collateral damage, the incumbent government will call them terrorists,
not because they terrorize the people, but because they terrorize THE
GOVERNMENT.
Understand this now.
Man times when somsone says they have to hurt you to help you
without your permission and at the point of a gun, they really want to
help themseves at your expense.
The definintion of evil is:
Saying something is good for you, when in fact it is good for THEM
and bad for you, and they know it.
Dig it and don't leave it.
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Wed Aug 5 14:19:20 EDT 2015
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore973.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFVwlOoURT1lqxE3HERAhN9AJ9yOWaQSt5sC6rvGaVSE4h69J3wcACeOA4m
Cp82OmPcnoFVBbDqhLna8ok=
=uRPf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
COPS AND THE CONSTITUTION
Do not look to a cop to understand constitutional issues.
Cops work for the government who filters out those who can.
The government is fundamentally anti constitutional, they are
interested only in their own security and persistence through financial
gain and power for its own sake.
Thus the only part of 'constitution' the government understands is
a police state.
That makes cops feel warm and fuzzy inside because it implies job
security as long as they obey orders without question and gives them
their license to violence which they crave so deeply.
The government will claim that they need to protect and serve
themselves, at your expense and collateral damage, in order to protect and
serve you.
Thus we have peace and security through silence and compliance,
which is a corrupt government's one and only modus operandi for
appearing to serve the people when in fact it is serving itself at the
expense of the people.
At some point, when the people begin to question the government and
its level of collateral damage to person, property and rights, and
alternative governments begin to vie for attention promising less
collateral damage, the incumbent government will call them terrorists,
not because they terrorize the people, but because they terrorize THE
GOVERNMENT.
Understand this now.
Man times when somsone says they have to hurt you to help you
without your permission and at the point of a gun, they really want to
help themseves at your expense.
The definintion of evil is:
Saying something is good for you, when in fact it is good for THEM
and bad for you, and they know it.
Dig it and don't leave it.
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Wed Aug 5 14:19:20 EDT 2015
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore973.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFVwlOoURT1lqxE3HERAhN9AJ9yOWaQSt5sC6rvGaVSE4h69J3wcACeOA4m
Cp82OmPcnoFVBbDqhLna8ok=
=uRPf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Tuesday, August 4, 2015
ACT18 (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
THE SCALE OF DISCOUNT
ACT - 18
15 September 1993
Copyright (C) 1993 Homer Wilson Smith
The following is taken from ADORE, which in turn stole most of it
from Transactional Analysis.
You will find most people on this scale somewhere as regards to
their major ruin in life. It also applies between parent and child.
Child goes "I got a problem', parent goes, "What problem, there's no
problem!'
DEAD
There is NO PROBLEM.
There is a PROBLEM but NO SOLUTION.
There is a PROBLEM and a SOLUTION but NO ONE WILL EVER FIND IT.
There is a PROBLEM and a SOLUTION and SOMEONE MAY FIND IT.
There is a PROBLEM and a SOLUTION and SOMEONE WILL FIND IT but NOT ME.
There is a PROBLEM and a SOLUTION and I may FIND IT.
There is a PROBLEM and a SOLUTION and I will FIND IT.
There is a SOLUTION but NO PROBLEM so I will CREATE ONE.
There is NO SOLUTION and NO PROBLEM
and
I CAN and MAY or MAY NOT CREATE EITHER.
I CAN'T IMAGINE WHAT a PROBLEM IS.
There is also,
There is a PROBLEM and a SOLUTION and ONLY I will find it.
There is a PROBLEM and a SOLUTION and ONLY I won't find it.
Homer
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Tue Aug 4 03:06:03 EDT 2015
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/act18.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFVwGRbURT1lqxE3HERAvj7AJwPziYrP6dgDkoTh38Z8s/Owtjv9wCfSNgq
wQRiwhhuMZURpp/f+ggcjuU=
=zBjP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
THE SCALE OF DISCOUNT
ACT - 18
15 September 1993
Copyright (C) 1993 Homer Wilson Smith
The following is taken from ADORE, which in turn stole most of it
from Transactional Analysis.
You will find most people on this scale somewhere as regards to
their major ruin in life. It also applies between parent and child.
Child goes "I got a problem', parent goes, "What problem, there's no
problem!'
DEAD
There is NO PROBLEM.
There is a PROBLEM but NO SOLUTION.
There is a PROBLEM and a SOLUTION but NO ONE WILL EVER FIND IT.
There is a PROBLEM and a SOLUTION and SOMEONE MAY FIND IT.
There is a PROBLEM and a SOLUTION and SOMEONE WILL FIND IT but NOT ME.
There is a PROBLEM and a SOLUTION and I may FIND IT.
There is a PROBLEM and a SOLUTION and I will FIND IT.
There is a SOLUTION but NO PROBLEM so I will CREATE ONE.
There is NO SOLUTION and NO PROBLEM
and
I CAN and MAY or MAY NOT CREATE EITHER.
I CAN'T IMAGINE WHAT a PROBLEM IS.
There is also,
There is a PROBLEM and a SOLUTION and ONLY I will find it.
There is a PROBLEM and a SOLUTION and ONLY I won't find it.
Homer
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Tue Aug 4 03:06:03 EDT 2015
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/act18.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFVwGRbURT1lqxE3HERAvj7AJwPziYrP6dgDkoTh38Z8s/Owtjv9wCfSNgq
wQRiwhhuMZURpp/f+ggcjuU=
=zBjP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Monday, August 3, 2015
ADORE684 (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
SIN
From the proof's point of view the only sin is to preach separation
of God and Soul.
The proof says that two different objects can never be certain of
each other.
THE PROOF http://www.lightlink.com/theproof
Thus if God and Soul are two different objects, neither could ever
know for sure the other exists.
The problem with mocking up a God that created the soul, is it
places the soul at effect. This God is bigger and more powerful than
the Soul, so the Soul can no longer consider that it mocked up God, but
has to consider that God mocked up the Soul.
That's EVIL you see?
EVIL is something which exists which the soul did not mockup nor
agree to. This violates the sovereignty of the soul and hands it over
to something else. The soul is owned at that point.
Every time the soul thinks of this thing that created him, he gets
monster feelings.
Further once the Soul imagines a God the creator, he then imagines
a Devil, which is ALSO BIGGER THAN THE SOUL IS.
Thus the only way the Soul can deal with the Devil is to appeal to
God to help or save him.
This places a double whammy of being an effect on the Soul.
The soul tries to pray to God for help, as if God doesn't already
know the soul's plight, and eventually the Soul goes into propitiation
towards God, "I'll do anything!", begging for salvation from troubles in
this life, and the afterlife.
But underlying this propitiation the soul is madder than hell that
God created him in the first place without his permission, and dumped
him into the Devil's play ground, again without his permission, as some
kind of test or gladiatorial spectacle.
This reduces all of creation and God itself to a matter of
behavior. The good and the strong are worthy, the Devilish and the weak
are not.
And we can understand perhaps the desire to test a being's 'free
will' by seeing how it will behave, but frankly if a soul has a truly
free will why would we expect it to be constrained by limiting concepts
of good and evil, sensitive and insensitive, compassionate and
mercilessness?
Wouldn't we WANT the 'free will' to be not so free but constrained
instead by the desire to do what is best for those it loves?
And if we grant the soul the ability to choose between the desire
to do what is best or do what is worst, what desire then will guide the
soul's choice of which desire it chooses?
In the end nothing is free of its own nature, and thus a soul
either cares and gives a damn or it doesn't. A truly free will would be
undetermined by anything and its actions thus random. Such a will would
be considered evil anyhow as there are many more ways to hurt and harm
than there are to help.
Truly free undetermined randomness would be a nightmare.
A free will then is merely one that can turn left if it wants to.
The question is left open why a will wants to or wants anything at
all.
The ultimate choice is between pleasure and pain, and no will of
any kind will ever choose pain for itself except as a way to pleasure,
the question remains then how this will relates to OTHER wills, with
sensitivity to their pain also, or with cold hard hearted ness.
One has to ask why any will would choose a life of hate when it
could have a life of love.
That question has an answer, you might want to look into your own
soul for the answer.
In any case, back to so called God testing souls and their use of
their 'free will', does it make sense to let those that fail the test,
those who rape, kill and suck blood, who take what other's produce and
produce nothing of their own, fail it by harming the good who are doing
well? If the good go bad from being beaten by the bad unjustly, do they
fail as well?
And what of the good who suffer the gauntlet of the bad,
what is their test? And is it fair?
And does God enjoy hearing the screams of those who opposed him
forever and ever?
Pretty sick eh? Not as sick as the people who believe this stuff
and teach it to little children as a CONTROL mechanism.
Creation is much more than behavior, and if there is a God, he
wouldn't be a God concerned with behavior.
And if a HUMAN made a universe and a Devil, and created beings and
dumped them in that universe to suffer the consequences without their
permission, and told them all, those of you who obey me will sit by me
in heaven forever, and those that disobey me will burn in hell forever,
and you had better turn the other cheek or else, well such a human would
be considered criminally insane.
So just so, that kind of God is criminally insane.
The truth is YOU ARE both God and the Devil, and every time you
pray to God to save you from the Devil, you are denying your own
responsibility and power for and over your own condition, committing
effort thought, emotion and irresponsibility for condition to separation
of God and Soul, and that seals your fate, BECAUSE IF YOU AND GOD AND
THE DEVIL ARE TWO DIFFERENT OBJECTS, NONE OF YOU CAN EVER KNOW THE OTHER
EXISTS WITH PERFECT CERTAINTY.
Thus you ARE God in carnation, and so who is testing who
how, for what reason, and to what final end?
Homer
======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Mon Aug 3 15:06:08 EDT 2015
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore684.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFVv7uhURT1lqxE3HERAngGAKCMUZxVpODXYuEq20GiCYB81EWLfQCeOj0D
cZ7knQ6QI7N1BnM6b5JNY+E=
=Mjdm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
SIN
From the proof's point of view the only sin is to preach separation
of God and Soul.
The proof says that two different objects can never be certain of
each other.
THE PROOF http://www.lightlink.com/theproof
Thus if God and Soul are two different objects, neither could ever
know for sure the other exists.
The problem with mocking up a God that created the soul, is it
places the soul at effect. This God is bigger and more powerful than
the Soul, so the Soul can no longer consider that it mocked up God, but
has to consider that God mocked up the Soul.
That's EVIL you see?
EVIL is something which exists which the soul did not mockup nor
agree to. This violates the sovereignty of the soul and hands it over
to something else. The soul is owned at that point.
Every time the soul thinks of this thing that created him, he gets
monster feelings.
Further once the Soul imagines a God the creator, he then imagines
a Devil, which is ALSO BIGGER THAN THE SOUL IS.
Thus the only way the Soul can deal with the Devil is to appeal to
God to help or save him.
This places a double whammy of being an effect on the Soul.
The soul tries to pray to God for help, as if God doesn't already
know the soul's plight, and eventually the Soul goes into propitiation
towards God, "I'll do anything!", begging for salvation from troubles in
this life, and the afterlife.
But underlying this propitiation the soul is madder than hell that
God created him in the first place without his permission, and dumped
him into the Devil's play ground, again without his permission, as some
kind of test or gladiatorial spectacle.
This reduces all of creation and God itself to a matter of
behavior. The good and the strong are worthy, the Devilish and the weak
are not.
And we can understand perhaps the desire to test a being's 'free
will' by seeing how it will behave, but frankly if a soul has a truly
free will why would we expect it to be constrained by limiting concepts
of good and evil, sensitive and insensitive, compassionate and
mercilessness?
Wouldn't we WANT the 'free will' to be not so free but constrained
instead by the desire to do what is best for those it loves?
And if we grant the soul the ability to choose between the desire
to do what is best or do what is worst, what desire then will guide the
soul's choice of which desire it chooses?
In the end nothing is free of its own nature, and thus a soul
either cares and gives a damn or it doesn't. A truly free will would be
undetermined by anything and its actions thus random. Such a will would
be considered evil anyhow as there are many more ways to hurt and harm
than there are to help.
Truly free undetermined randomness would be a nightmare.
A free will then is merely one that can turn left if it wants to.
The question is left open why a will wants to or wants anything at
all.
The ultimate choice is between pleasure and pain, and no will of
any kind will ever choose pain for itself except as a way to pleasure,
the question remains then how this will relates to OTHER wills, with
sensitivity to their pain also, or with cold hard hearted ness.
One has to ask why any will would choose a life of hate when it
could have a life of love.
That question has an answer, you might want to look into your own
soul for the answer.
In any case, back to so called God testing souls and their use of
their 'free will', does it make sense to let those that fail the test,
those who rape, kill and suck blood, who take what other's produce and
produce nothing of their own, fail it by harming the good who are doing
well? If the good go bad from being beaten by the bad unjustly, do they
fail as well?
And what of the good who suffer the gauntlet of the bad,
what is their test? And is it fair?
And does God enjoy hearing the screams of those who opposed him
forever and ever?
Pretty sick eh? Not as sick as the people who believe this stuff
and teach it to little children as a CONTROL mechanism.
Creation is much more than behavior, and if there is a God, he
wouldn't be a God concerned with behavior.
And if a HUMAN made a universe and a Devil, and created beings and
dumped them in that universe to suffer the consequences without their
permission, and told them all, those of you who obey me will sit by me
in heaven forever, and those that disobey me will burn in hell forever,
and you had better turn the other cheek or else, well such a human would
be considered criminally insane.
So just so, that kind of God is criminally insane.
The truth is YOU ARE both God and the Devil, and every time you
pray to God to save you from the Devil, you are denying your own
responsibility and power for and over your own condition, committing
effort thought, emotion and irresponsibility for condition to separation
of God and Soul, and that seals your fate, BECAUSE IF YOU AND GOD AND
THE DEVIL ARE TWO DIFFERENT OBJECTS, NONE OF YOU CAN EVER KNOW THE OTHER
EXISTS WITH PERFECT CERTAINTY.
Thus you ARE God in carnation, and so who is testing who
how, for what reason, and to what final end?
Homer
======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Mon Aug 3 15:06:08 EDT 2015
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore684.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFVv7uhURT1lqxE3HERAngGAKCMUZxVpODXYuEq20GiCYB81EWLfQCeOj0D
cZ7knQ6QI7N1BnM6b5JNY+E=
=Mjdm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Sunday, August 2, 2015
ADORE28 (fwd)
DEMONSTRATION OF OT POWERS
Look if YOU want to demonstrate OT powers and become a matter of
national security overnight, fine do so.
But asking or demanding that others do so is stupid to the point of
being evil.
Anyone who gives in to the temptation deserves what they get, but
their friends probably don't.
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth and Peace. Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sat Aug 1 03:06:01 EDT 2015
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore28.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFVvG/ZURT1lqxE3HERArZGAJ97xiDhW9KtCXAYo/D2dPlFUv6eRACfUBVb
JM3L7rmx6ys9VOEzrR9yk00=
=igsa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Look if YOU want to demonstrate OT powers and become a matter of
national security overnight, fine do so.
But asking or demanding that others do so is stupid to the point of
being evil.
Anyone who gives in to the temptation deserves what they get, but
their friends probably don't.
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth and Peace. Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sat Aug 1 03:06:01 EDT 2015
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore28.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFVvG/ZURT1lqxE3HERArZGAJ97xiDhW9KtCXAYo/D2dPlFUv6eRACfUBVb
JM3L7rmx6ys9VOEzrR9yk00=
=igsa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
ADORE618 (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
GUARDIAN DICOMS
A dicom is a DIchotomy of Comparable and Opposite Magnitude.
Dicoms usually come in pairs of 4.
NO STATIC - SOME STATIC
NO KINETIC - SOME KINETIC
Although we like to think that HATE is the opposite of LOVE, for
our purposes the true opposite of LOVE is NO LOVE.
NO LOVE is either pretended NO LOVE at not-isness on the tone
scale, or it is actual NO LOVE at as-isness on the tone scale. The
first will read and run, the second will float.
However since love and hate seem to be related as opposites we can
form the auditing pair:
NO LOVE - SOME LOVE
NO HATE - SOME HATE
The primary dicom is
NO - SOME
This can be normalized for auditing purposes to:
NO NO - SOME NO
NO SOME - SOME SOME
NO NO means not-ising not-ising, no longer being aware
of not-ising. At SOME NO, the being would be aware of
not-ising.
NO SOME means not-ising isness. SOME SOME means aware
of isness.
When specific items won't read, one can often find the
next item by running NO and SOME without any item attached. That
runs the next item in line until it appears or another runnable
item appears instead.
A basic generic item pair is:
NO THING - SOME THING
English plays with this to create a dicom of the form
NOTHING - SOMETHING
To normalize it to our auditing standards and to allow it to run
successfully we need to run
NO NOTHING - SOME NOTHING
NO SOMETHING - SOME SOMETHING
This allows us to run thetans and their creations.
Remember that a thetan experiences itself as a nothing there, and
its creations as a something there.
This is a reversal of the truth which is that the thetan is the
only something there is, and its creations are glow in the dark nothings
in the thetan's substrate of self.
Imagine a phosphorescent rock sitting in the dark, not glowing.
It's a something there, but is experienced as a nothing there.
Then we shine a UV lamp on it for a few seconds and remove it.
Suddenly the rock is glowing red, green, blue and white in the
dark.
Now it is experienced as something there, but the change from
'nothing there' to 'something there' is no where as substantial as the
original something that was there when the rock was not glowing at all.
In other words a change from not glowing to glowing is not a
significant change from nothing there to something there.
While the change from the absence of a thetan to a presence of a
thetan is a significant change from nothing there to something there.
So even though the thetan experiences itself as 'nothing there', it
is in fact the only something there that can be, except perhaps for the
Source substrate that unifies all thetans into one operating organism.
The conscious experiences of MEST that thetan considers are
'something there', are no more there than when they are off.
What's there is still there, namely thetan and Source.
Source will always be there whether or not it is glowing in the
night of the void with conscious experiences.
Void that you can see and void that you can not see is still the
same void, no change in stuff.
A thetan that is sound asleep in the Big Snooze and manifesting
absolutely nothing, is still as much a something there as when he is
awake and spewing conscious experiences all over the place.
By the way the glowing of the void as conscious experience is not
the result of emmanation of photons.
The void is self luminous.
Thus whether it is glowing as something there (color) or nothing
there (darkness), the void is still there. It may have changed state,
but it hasn't changed whether it is still there.
The static therefore, although experienced as nothing there, is
actual and very much there, just not in space and time which are
glowings of self luminosity in the substrate of the static.
SHORT DETOUR INTO THE PROOF
Space is a viewpoint of dimension. The viewpoint has no dimension,
and the dimension it sees has no actual dimension either. In other words
you don't need to have a 3 dimensional space to experience 3 dimensions.
A self luminous mockup of a 3 dimensional rock doesn't, AS A
MOCKUP, take up any actual space or time.
Mockups are pictures OF space and time and do not themselves take
up any space or time.
Hyenas can't handle that one, they will demand you prove it.
They consider it the extraordinary claim, but the claim that
mockups of space and time DO take up actual space and time OR that there
is actual space and time in which to put a mockup, is the more
extraordinary.
But you know a hyena, 6 billion hyenas can't be wrong!
Except on Earth. The incredibility and preposterousness of it all
protects the dreamball theory completely from discovery and acceptance.
Self luminous (glow in the dark) mockups of 3 dimensional objects
are themselves zero dimensional.
A 3 dimensional object couldn't ever be self luminous.
In fact a 3 dimensional object could never be SEEN no matter how
many photons it emmanated, because the see-er and seen would be
separated by a space time distance and thus be two different objects.
One is always seeing A by looking at something A emmanated when A is
separated from the see-er. Thus one never actually sees *A*, only the
something else.
Sorry two different objects can never see each other nor know about
each other with certainty.
Thus if God and Soul are two different objects, they will never
know about each other with certainty.
No object can ever see another object different from itself.
True space or time between two objects makes them different from
each other, and therefore blind to each other via direct self luminous
perception.
Therefore if you can see it, self luminousness means zero
dimensional. Conscious mockups which you can't see aren't emmanating
anything at you, you see them as they are directly, they are zero
emmission visuals. Nothing in the alleged physical space time universe
can do this.
Thus during the running of NOTHING and SOMETHING, your pc's
conception of what is nothing and what is something will change
dramatically all over the place. That is TA motion coming off the case
and charge running out from an eternity of lies.
GUARDIAN DICOMS
Guardian dicoms are those dicoms that make it hard or impossible
for a pc to make case gain.
Case gain is basically recognizing that one was completely wrong,
and getting right.
But the pc finds out he was SO wrong, he develops a problem about
it, and thus can not change his mind any more.
His willingness and acceptance levels on being wrong can be easily
exceeded.
"If I am a god, why would I have DISGRACED myself so?"
NO GRACE - SOME GRACE
NO DISGRACE - SOME DISGRACE
"I will never live it down."
He still doesn't really know WHAT he will never live down, but he
is quite sure he won't!
Thus during auditing the pc will run into the 'wall of
preposterousness', and suddenly go flying out of session.
He just ran out of permission to go any further because 'this is
all nuts you know.'
NO PERMISSION - SOME PERMISSION
NO FORBIDDEN - SOME FORBIDDEN
He will be able to audit this life which seems 'normal' to him, but
ask him to take it earlier similar back to whole track and you will get
balk.
NO NORMAL - SOME NORMAL
NO PARANORMAL - SOME PARANORMAL
It is quite acceptable to him that his conscious Self is made of
pieces and parts tick tocking away, but the idea that his Self is the
fundamental indivisible stuff of which the AllThatIs is made gives him
the willies.
"It's too good to be true, I would just die of shame..."
Maybe he will go whole track for a few seconds, but then something
will creep up on him and say "Hey I don't BELIEVE in whole track, this
is REDICULOUS, how can I be auditing this stuff?!"
NO BELIEF - SOME BELIEF
NO DISBELIEF - SOME DISBELIEF
NO REDICULOUS - SOME REDICULOUS
At that moment the needle packs up, the TA freezes, and that's the
end of that session, until the guardian dicom that was restimulated is
addressed AS IT SELF.
He has a problem in choice. If the world is a dream, and the pc
has lived before this life, then he had to have made a CHOICE to come
into the body and become mortal.
NO CHOICE - SOME CHOICE
But try as me may he doesn't remember that choice, nor any part of
the CONTEXT surrounding it.
Why on Earth would anyone chose to BECOME a body?
Having and owning one like a dog might be nice, riding one around
like a horse could be fun, but to BECOME ONE and forget everything that
isn't a body, and toss one's sovereignty out the door to the dust and
the winds?
That's NUTS!
So
NO NUTS - SOME NUTS
becomes a guardian dicom.
These things are so powerful, that when he runs into them they
DEFINE truth for him.
There is certainly no arguing with them.
After crashing into the wall of preposterousness at full speed
while trying to go exterior, he will come away KNOWING that
exteriorization is preposterous!
It's a kind of knowing by emoting, it surely isn't scientific, but
your pc isn't interested in scientific rigor at that moment, he just
wants to salvage some respect for himself which he can't do by giving
any credence at all to this nonsense!
NO RESPECT - SOME RESPECT
NO CONTEMPT - SOME CONTEMPT
NO NONSENSE - SOME NONSENSE
NO SENSE - SOME SENSE
NO CREDIBLE - SOME CREDIBLE
NO INCREDIBLE - SOME INCREDIBLE
There are a lot of guardian dicoms.
Every time your pc runs into one of these trying to go wholetrack,
or imagining being out of his body, there will be a phrase associated
with it that will hit the pc BEFORE the knowing by emoting.
By giving credence to the phrase, going into wonder and question
asking about whether it is right or not, he thus amplifies the feeling
that goes with it into a overwhelm of acceptance.
Idea will come up such as:
"It's too good to be true.
"I would die from shock if I found out..."
"I would go SPLAT all over native state..."
"I would go crazy if it were true."
"I will die of chagrin and shame."
He can't stand the thought of his hope going soaring up into the
sky, just to be crushed down to the ground again.
NO OPERATION - SOME OPERATION
NO CRUSH - SOME CRUSH
"How would I ever live it down, I was God in carnation and here I
thought for the longest time I was a hyena!"
To some it is not clear whether a hyena will ever live it down, but
to be frank, just have them mockup God incarnating as a dung beetle or
dingle berry on Roland's ass.
They will eventually cognite that everyone is an asshole bar none,
no matter how high their pedestal in the pecking order of admiration.
They will cognite that Source sources what Source is not, and thus
God incarnates as what God is not, and yet God loves himself one and
all.
It's a new view.
Here are some remaining guardian dicoms which you must look out for
when you pc balks in session from making real case gain.
NO DOUBT - SOME DOUBT
NO CERTAINTY - SOME CERTAINTY
NO UNCERTAINTY - SOME UNCERTAINTY
NO DECISION - SOME DECISION
NO INDECISION - SOME INDECISION
NO POSSIBILITY - SOME POSSIBILITY
NO IMPOSSIBILITY - SOME IMPOSSIBILITY
NO NATURAL - SOME NATURAL
NO UNNATURAL - SOME UNNATURAL
NO PERMISSION - SOME PERMISSION
NO FORBIDDEN - SOME FORBIDDEN
"Fools rush in, where Angels dare not tread, and Gods go
screaming for their Mama." - Adore
NO FOOL - SOME FOOL
NO WISDOM - SOME WISDOM
NO WONDER - SOME WONDER
NO QUESTION - SOME QUESTION
NO ANSWER - SOME ANSWER
NO ABILITY - SOME ABILITY
NO INABILITY - SOME INABILITY
NO WILLINGESS - SOME WILLINGNESS
NO UNWILLINGESS - SOME UNWILLINGNESS
NO REDICULOUS - SOME REDICULOUS
NO PREPOSTEROUS - SOME PREPOSTEROUS
NO DIVINE - SOME DIVINE
NO HOLY - SOME HOLY
NO LUDICROUS - SOME LUDICROUS
NO TRAGEDY - SOME TRAGEDY
NO TRAVESTY - SOME TRAVESTY
NO MIRACLE - SOME MIRACLE
NO FAITH - SOME FAITH
NO FAITHLESSNESS - SOME FAITHLESSNESS
NO UNDREAMED DREAM COME TRUE - SOME UNDREAMED DREAM COME TRUE
NO BETRAYAL - SOME BETRAYAL
NO CONFRONT - SOME CONFRONT
NO FLINCH - SOME FLINCH
NO CRINGE - SOME CRINGE
NO COURAGE - SOME COURAGE
NO COWARDICE - SOME COWARDICE
NO BELIEF - SOME BELIEF
NO DISBELIEF - SOME DISBELIEF
NO DESIRE - SOME DESIRE
NO HOPE - SOME HOPE
NO DARING - SOME DARING
NO DARE NOT - SOME DARE NOT
NO STUPIFYINGLY ASTOUNDING - SOME STUPIFYINGLY ASTOUNDING
NO DANGER - SOME DANGER
NO SAFETY - SOME SAFETY
Operation of dicoms generates power.
This last one is the warp core, but won't run until all other
guardians are cleared.
Games that have no danger or safety are not games, they are a
dance.
Thus in trying to reoptimize a pc's games, you are trying to move
danger/safety upscale to where real power and courage can be generated.
That's where the E-meter starts to float and the pc has his proof.
Pray that the poor auditor can stand it.
Homer
======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Sun Aug 2 16:06:37 EDT 2015
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore618.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFVvnhNURT1lqxE3HERArWVAJ9Hns2DkvQP7XAWwi/MFfB3m1vVQQCdF4r/
LQaw1tm0FTTHipWTL2EI7yY=
=2loV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
GUARDIAN DICOMS
A dicom is a DIchotomy of Comparable and Opposite Magnitude.
Dicoms usually come in pairs of 4.
NO STATIC - SOME STATIC
NO KINETIC - SOME KINETIC
Although we like to think that HATE is the opposite of LOVE, for
our purposes the true opposite of LOVE is NO LOVE.
NO LOVE is either pretended NO LOVE at not-isness on the tone
scale, or it is actual NO LOVE at as-isness on the tone scale. The
first will read and run, the second will float.
However since love and hate seem to be related as opposites we can
form the auditing pair:
NO LOVE - SOME LOVE
NO HATE - SOME HATE
The primary dicom is
NO - SOME
This can be normalized for auditing purposes to:
NO NO - SOME NO
NO SOME - SOME SOME
NO NO means not-ising not-ising, no longer being aware
of not-ising. At SOME NO, the being would be aware of
not-ising.
NO SOME means not-ising isness. SOME SOME means aware
of isness.
When specific items won't read, one can often find the
next item by running NO and SOME without any item attached. That
runs the next item in line until it appears or another runnable
item appears instead.
A basic generic item pair is:
NO THING - SOME THING
English plays with this to create a dicom of the form
NOTHING - SOMETHING
To normalize it to our auditing standards and to allow it to run
successfully we need to run
NO NOTHING - SOME NOTHING
NO SOMETHING - SOME SOMETHING
This allows us to run thetans and their creations.
Remember that a thetan experiences itself as a nothing there, and
its creations as a something there.
This is a reversal of the truth which is that the thetan is the
only something there is, and its creations are glow in the dark nothings
in the thetan's substrate of self.
Imagine a phosphorescent rock sitting in the dark, not glowing.
It's a something there, but is experienced as a nothing there.
Then we shine a UV lamp on it for a few seconds and remove it.
Suddenly the rock is glowing red, green, blue and white in the
dark.
Now it is experienced as something there, but the change from
'nothing there' to 'something there' is no where as substantial as the
original something that was there when the rock was not glowing at all.
In other words a change from not glowing to glowing is not a
significant change from nothing there to something there.
While the change from the absence of a thetan to a presence of a
thetan is a significant change from nothing there to something there.
So even though the thetan experiences itself as 'nothing there', it
is in fact the only something there that can be, except perhaps for the
Source substrate that unifies all thetans into one operating organism.
The conscious experiences of MEST that thetan considers are
'something there', are no more there than when they are off.
What's there is still there, namely thetan and Source.
Source will always be there whether or not it is glowing in the
night of the void with conscious experiences.
Void that you can see and void that you can not see is still the
same void, no change in stuff.
A thetan that is sound asleep in the Big Snooze and manifesting
absolutely nothing, is still as much a something there as when he is
awake and spewing conscious experiences all over the place.
By the way the glowing of the void as conscious experience is not
the result of emmanation of photons.
The void is self luminous.
Thus whether it is glowing as something there (color) or nothing
there (darkness), the void is still there. It may have changed state,
but it hasn't changed whether it is still there.
The static therefore, although experienced as nothing there, is
actual and very much there, just not in space and time which are
glowings of self luminosity in the substrate of the static.
SHORT DETOUR INTO THE PROOF
Space is a viewpoint of dimension. The viewpoint has no dimension,
and the dimension it sees has no actual dimension either. In other words
you don't need to have a 3 dimensional space to experience 3 dimensions.
A self luminous mockup of a 3 dimensional rock doesn't, AS A
MOCKUP, take up any actual space or time.
Mockups are pictures OF space and time and do not themselves take
up any space or time.
Hyenas can't handle that one, they will demand you prove it.
They consider it the extraordinary claim, but the claim that
mockups of space and time DO take up actual space and time OR that there
is actual space and time in which to put a mockup, is the more
extraordinary.
But you know a hyena, 6 billion hyenas can't be wrong!
Except on Earth. The incredibility and preposterousness of it all
protects the dreamball theory completely from discovery and acceptance.
Self luminous (glow in the dark) mockups of 3 dimensional objects
are themselves zero dimensional.
A 3 dimensional object couldn't ever be self luminous.
In fact a 3 dimensional object could never be SEEN no matter how
many photons it emmanated, because the see-er and seen would be
separated by a space time distance and thus be two different objects.
One is always seeing A by looking at something A emmanated when A is
separated from the see-er. Thus one never actually sees *A*, only the
something else.
Sorry two different objects can never see each other nor know about
each other with certainty.
Thus if God and Soul are two different objects, they will never
know about each other with certainty.
No object can ever see another object different from itself.
True space or time between two objects makes them different from
each other, and therefore blind to each other via direct self luminous
perception.
Therefore if you can see it, self luminousness means zero
dimensional. Conscious mockups which you can't see aren't emmanating
anything at you, you see them as they are directly, they are zero
emmission visuals. Nothing in the alleged physical space time universe
can do this.
Thus during the running of NOTHING and SOMETHING, your pc's
conception of what is nothing and what is something will change
dramatically all over the place. That is TA motion coming off the case
and charge running out from an eternity of lies.
GUARDIAN DICOMS
Guardian dicoms are those dicoms that make it hard or impossible
for a pc to make case gain.
Case gain is basically recognizing that one was completely wrong,
and getting right.
But the pc finds out he was SO wrong, he develops a problem about
it, and thus can not change his mind any more.
His willingness and acceptance levels on being wrong can be easily
exceeded.
"If I am a god, why would I have DISGRACED myself so?"
NO GRACE - SOME GRACE
NO DISGRACE - SOME DISGRACE
"I will never live it down."
He still doesn't really know WHAT he will never live down, but he
is quite sure he won't!
Thus during auditing the pc will run into the 'wall of
preposterousness', and suddenly go flying out of session.
He just ran out of permission to go any further because 'this is
all nuts you know.'
NO PERMISSION - SOME PERMISSION
NO FORBIDDEN - SOME FORBIDDEN
He will be able to audit this life which seems 'normal' to him, but
ask him to take it earlier similar back to whole track and you will get
balk.
NO NORMAL - SOME NORMAL
NO PARANORMAL - SOME PARANORMAL
It is quite acceptable to him that his conscious Self is made of
pieces and parts tick tocking away, but the idea that his Self is the
fundamental indivisible stuff of which the AllThatIs is made gives him
the willies.
"It's too good to be true, I would just die of shame..."
Maybe he will go whole track for a few seconds, but then something
will creep up on him and say "Hey I don't BELIEVE in whole track, this
is REDICULOUS, how can I be auditing this stuff?!"
NO BELIEF - SOME BELIEF
NO DISBELIEF - SOME DISBELIEF
NO REDICULOUS - SOME REDICULOUS
At that moment the needle packs up, the TA freezes, and that's the
end of that session, until the guardian dicom that was restimulated is
addressed AS IT SELF.
He has a problem in choice. If the world is a dream, and the pc
has lived before this life, then he had to have made a CHOICE to come
into the body and become mortal.
NO CHOICE - SOME CHOICE
But try as me may he doesn't remember that choice, nor any part of
the CONTEXT surrounding it.
Why on Earth would anyone chose to BECOME a body?
Having and owning one like a dog might be nice, riding one around
like a horse could be fun, but to BECOME ONE and forget everything that
isn't a body, and toss one's sovereignty out the door to the dust and
the winds?
That's NUTS!
So
NO NUTS - SOME NUTS
becomes a guardian dicom.
These things are so powerful, that when he runs into them they
DEFINE truth for him.
There is certainly no arguing with them.
After crashing into the wall of preposterousness at full speed
while trying to go exterior, he will come away KNOWING that
exteriorization is preposterous!
It's a kind of knowing by emoting, it surely isn't scientific, but
your pc isn't interested in scientific rigor at that moment, he just
wants to salvage some respect for himself which he can't do by giving
any credence at all to this nonsense!
NO RESPECT - SOME RESPECT
NO CONTEMPT - SOME CONTEMPT
NO NONSENSE - SOME NONSENSE
NO SENSE - SOME SENSE
NO CREDIBLE - SOME CREDIBLE
NO INCREDIBLE - SOME INCREDIBLE
There are a lot of guardian dicoms.
Every time your pc runs into one of these trying to go wholetrack,
or imagining being out of his body, there will be a phrase associated
with it that will hit the pc BEFORE the knowing by emoting.
By giving credence to the phrase, going into wonder and question
asking about whether it is right or not, he thus amplifies the feeling
that goes with it into a overwhelm of acceptance.
Idea will come up such as:
"It's too good to be true.
"I would die from shock if I found out..."
"I would go SPLAT all over native state..."
"I would go crazy if it were true."
"I will die of chagrin and shame."
He can't stand the thought of his hope going soaring up into the
sky, just to be crushed down to the ground again.
NO OPERATION - SOME OPERATION
NO CRUSH - SOME CRUSH
"How would I ever live it down, I was God in carnation and here I
thought for the longest time I was a hyena!"
To some it is not clear whether a hyena will ever live it down, but
to be frank, just have them mockup God incarnating as a dung beetle or
dingle berry on Roland's ass.
They will eventually cognite that everyone is an asshole bar none,
no matter how high their pedestal in the pecking order of admiration.
They will cognite that Source sources what Source is not, and thus
God incarnates as what God is not, and yet God loves himself one and
all.
It's a new view.
Here are some remaining guardian dicoms which you must look out for
when you pc balks in session from making real case gain.
NO DOUBT - SOME DOUBT
NO CERTAINTY - SOME CERTAINTY
NO UNCERTAINTY - SOME UNCERTAINTY
NO DECISION - SOME DECISION
NO INDECISION - SOME INDECISION
NO POSSIBILITY - SOME POSSIBILITY
NO IMPOSSIBILITY - SOME IMPOSSIBILITY
NO NATURAL - SOME NATURAL
NO UNNATURAL - SOME UNNATURAL
NO PERMISSION - SOME PERMISSION
NO FORBIDDEN - SOME FORBIDDEN
"Fools rush in, where Angels dare not tread, and Gods go
screaming for their Mama." - Adore
NO FOOL - SOME FOOL
NO WISDOM - SOME WISDOM
NO WONDER - SOME WONDER
NO QUESTION - SOME QUESTION
NO ANSWER - SOME ANSWER
NO ABILITY - SOME ABILITY
NO INABILITY - SOME INABILITY
NO WILLINGESS - SOME WILLINGNESS
NO UNWILLINGESS - SOME UNWILLINGNESS
NO REDICULOUS - SOME REDICULOUS
NO PREPOSTEROUS - SOME PREPOSTEROUS
NO DIVINE - SOME DIVINE
NO HOLY - SOME HOLY
NO LUDICROUS - SOME LUDICROUS
NO TRAGEDY - SOME TRAGEDY
NO TRAVESTY - SOME TRAVESTY
NO MIRACLE - SOME MIRACLE
NO FAITH - SOME FAITH
NO FAITHLESSNESS - SOME FAITHLESSNESS
NO UNDREAMED DREAM COME TRUE - SOME UNDREAMED DREAM COME TRUE
NO BETRAYAL - SOME BETRAYAL
NO CONFRONT - SOME CONFRONT
NO FLINCH - SOME FLINCH
NO CRINGE - SOME CRINGE
NO COURAGE - SOME COURAGE
NO COWARDICE - SOME COWARDICE
NO BELIEF - SOME BELIEF
NO DISBELIEF - SOME DISBELIEF
NO DESIRE - SOME DESIRE
NO HOPE - SOME HOPE
NO DARING - SOME DARING
NO DARE NOT - SOME DARE NOT
NO STUPIFYINGLY ASTOUNDING - SOME STUPIFYINGLY ASTOUNDING
NO DANGER - SOME DANGER
NO SAFETY - SOME SAFETY
Operation of dicoms generates power.
This last one is the warp core, but won't run until all other
guardians are cleared.
Games that have no danger or safety are not games, they are a
dance.
Thus in trying to reoptimize a pc's games, you are trying to move
danger/safety upscale to where real power and courage can be generated.
That's where the E-meter starts to float and the pc has his proof.
Pray that the poor auditor can stand it.
Homer
======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Sun Aug 2 16:06:37 EDT 2015
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore618.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFVvnhNURT1lqxE3HERArWVAJ9Hns2DkvQP7XAWwi/MFfB3m1vVQQCdF4r/
LQaw1tm0FTTHipWTL2EI7yY=
=2loV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)