Tuesday, December 29, 2015

Collective Of Concepts To Better Understand Your Project Management [0818]

For some, the black-and-white personality of Project Management work makes for a refreshing challenge. Delivering a Project driver’s seat n time also subservient budget”can provide great emotional trophies. The job offers the opportunity to lead, further new projects keep the work fresh.

In a Project Management, the Strategy Principle determines what is trip to be done and when, and the Management Principle establishes how it is going to typify done and by whom.

All project managers are prevailing suppress at least isolated CPM scheduling software application, agnate as Microsoft Project, Primavera, Scitor push on Scheduler, AEC FastTrack, CA-SuperProject, or Kidasa Milestones. Many scheduling applications are tailored to specific industries or project types, but all worth CPM preponderance methodology.

The least to a successful Project Management is in the planning: 1. being shiny on the objectives, deciding how to work together being a team, 2. thinking through how to drawing near the scope, 3. setting up a diary and budget, 4. understanding clearly what will make the deliverable acceptable to the client of the project.

Project managers blame act as found in integral industries. Their numbers admit grown rapidly as drill and commerce has realised that notably of what irrefutable does is survive Management work.

When you presume true of a business manager, typically, youll think of someone who oversees a specific functional big idea areafor instance, a sales team manager, or the manager of the accounting apportionment. These kinsfolk encourage to manage ongoing or frequently rent processes such due to ensuring that the sales team meets its monthly quota of cold calls to prospective clients, in the case of the sales manager.

—

Publishing Guidelines: You may publish my object in your newsletter, on your website or prominence your print publication provided you include the resource creel at the perform. advice would be appreciated but is not required.

project management course Free

 

 

 

Keywords: ,project management,project management pdf,project management professional,project management software,project management institute,project management ppt,project management tools, project management course,project management course in egypt,project management plan,project management auc,project management activities,project management academy,project management aramco,p roject management app,project management articles,project management a managerial approach 8th edition pdf,project management assignment,project management approach,project management apps,project management books,project management books free download,project management body of knowledge 5th edition pdf,project management book,project management body of knowledge,project management basics,project management benefits,project management definition,project management diploma in egypt,

ADORE78 (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


ACCORD

The Cosmic All or AllThatIs is in perfect accord with itself.

Accord is a relationship between desire and what is.

There can not be anything that is that is not desired, and
there can not be anything that is desired that can not be.

Thus where ever there is ability there is willingness to use it,
and where ever there is willingness there is ability to accomodate it.

That is Accord.

Anything less is an Eternal ARC break.

Homer


- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth and Peace. Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Tue Dec 29 12:06:02 EST 2015
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore78.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFWgr16URT1lqxE3HERAv/fAJ9uaVxuUcieNC1M6JBkINOrVl9lywCfTJDa
K5ZJTc6tUFWx20cyr1k9fys=
=iLOK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l

Monday, December 28, 2015

ADORE934 (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


THE END OF ENDLESS SEARCH RUNDOWN

There are 4 goals that are particularly deadly to a thetan wanting
to go OT. The human engages in these goals without suspecting them,

If one breaks their dramatization while trying to go clear or OT,
without spotting and clearing the wreckage, the result will be
physically, emotionally, mentally and spiritually disasterous.

The 4 goals are:

To Look For - To Not Look For
To Seek - To Not Seek
To Search For - To Not Search For
To Try to Find - To Not Try to Find

To dramatize means to bring seriousness, importance, permanence,
pain and *EFFORT* (force) to a goal.

Beings are GodSouls.

They have a God side (the OT) operating above 'apparencies are
reality' using postulates and considerations to create and change
things. Actual cause flows from the static to the apparent kinetic.

They also have a Soul side (the preclear) operating below
'apparencies are reality' at Spirit of Play or lower, using EFFORT to
create and change things. Apparent cause flows between apparent objects
in the kinetic world that are actually created by the static in real
time!

The static is scalar or zero dimensional.

The apparent kinetic is a scalar display of multidimensionality.

That's why we call them the static scalar, and the kinetic manifold.

Manifold means many dimensional, at least more than zero!

The being is A VIEW POINT OF DIMENSION. - LRH

The being is the static viewing the kinetic.

The being's conscious panoply is what the kinetic manifold
looks like from the scalar static's point of view.

The scalar static can change its view point any time it wants
merely by conceiving it. That's how a scalar static moves around
inside the kinetic, as there is no actual space to move around in.

And certainly not by force :)

How a something without dimension can view holographic displays of
apparent dimension, we will leave up to advanced physics and information
theory for the moment, but that is what is going on.

The kinetic that you see around you is certainly actual, as a
hologram in your consciousness, but there are things about it that are
not actual, such as out-there-ness, out-then-ness, solidity, and cross
cause between two different kinetic objects.

Cross cause is direct causation between two different kinetic
objects, each is the effect of the other.

Cross cause claims to bypass the static.

Cross cause does not exist, never has existed and never will exist,
cross cause is an apparency only.

Cross cause is called virtualization of cause, the static is the
virtualizer and causes the virtualization of cause between two or more
different kinetic objects.

Thus force, which is the representation of cause in the kinetic
world, is a virtualization and is in fact utterly without effect.

When the bat hits the ball, the bat has NOTHING to do with the ball
moving.

Or simply consider a ball bouncing off a solid wall.

The ball bounces off the wall, not because the wall has direct
cause against the ball, but because the static directly causes both wall
and ball to act AS IF they have direct cause between them. Thus
external cause between kinetic objects (force) is an illusion of
magnitude.

The Soul side being believes in the actuality of force cause
between kinetic objects and even himself.

The God side being knows force cause is a joke.

THE GOAL TO LOOK FOR

To a Soul side human, looking for things makes sense, looking for
peace, serenity, security, safety, friendship, love, mates, work, money,
help, survival, redemption, and where he put something last etc.

To a God side being however, looking for anything PRE POSTULATES
that he doesn't have it! For a being who creates in the mere conception
of things, thinking you do not have something and then looking for it is
deadly.

This is why in dreams if you want girls and you go looking for them
you won't find them. But if you sit down right where you are, the girls
will come out of the wood work.

To consider you do not have something, you have to conceive it
first, how can you conceive it and not have it?

A God side being has to turn himself into a Soul side being to
engage in that trick at all.

Rather than PUTTING IT THERE, he is going around looking at places
going 'Nope, not here, nope not here...'

He can do that forever, and er uh, has been.

Seeking physical things via effort is the basic game that Soul side
being's play, but seeking spiritual things such as understandings of
self, good feelings, and peace, must never become a game of the Soul
side being, because for one, if its a game, maybe he can lose it, and
for two, peace and spiritual understandings can never be created or
changed by EFFORT or FORCE.

Dig it and don't leave it.

Effort and force are the only cause the Soul Side being has in the
kinetic world.

Happiness, peace, self respect, serentiy, aren't of the kinetic
world, they are of the static world, get it?

The kinetic world = Sabe (SA-BAY)

The static world = Dura.

Thus seeking peace and happiness is a major joke, and a death trap
of magnitude.

How much motion and moving masses around are you going to engage in
to make happiness?

The static can create endless warm beauty and happiness forever for
free merely by thinking about it.

The kinetic can create squat because his every thought is an EFFORT
to create.

He can't make a mockup for the same reason, he is using mental
effort to create the mockup. He never asks how me makes the effort!

Pure postulate.

So the cycle of aberration goes like this.

1.) Postulate that you don't BE, DO, HAVE or KNOW something.

2.) Postulate that you desire to BE, DO, HAVE or KNOW something.

3.) Postulate question asking "WHAT SHOULD I DO TO OBTAIN IT?"

4.) Compute, compute, compute until he computes a DO to match the
WANT.

5.) Strenuous do, do, do, or effort to look for, seek, search for,
or try to find it.

6.) Failure

7.) Deathly sickness, 24x7.

On a preclear who is ready to take on the God side of his being,
who is ready to take on the static as cause and the kinetic as effect,
who is ready to feel just fine thank you no matter how many of his
friends are crucified along the side of the road he walks, begging to
die and not being able to, we can start to run out these deadly
dramatizations of temporal caring or giving a damn as follows.

The E/P is Eternal Fair Chosen, not the Temporal "Who or what is
cause around here, and why is it such an asshole?!

Run, get the idea of:

Not Looking for (something or someone)
Looking for

Not Searching for
Searching for

Not Trying to Find
Trying to Find

Not Seeking for
Seeking for

Run to taste, but you want the EFFORT, EMOTION, THOUGHT and sense
of IRRESPONSIBILITY involved.

He needs to spot the 'not putting it there', every time he looks to
see if it is there, whatever it is he is looking for.

And he needs to spot the AND between the ITEM AND NOT ITEM.

He wants to find but is terrified out of his wits about finding.

He complains about not being able to have, but he would shit bricks
of gold if he had what he wanted.

He wants power and size, but just a LITTLE bit of power and size.

He can have all the power and size he can handle and a lot more,
but he can't have just that LITTLE BIT. The plane of his soul
is either on the ground or its flying, there is no inbetween.

He can't be just a little bit of a God. For somethings there is no
gradient.

And he needs to spot the QUESTION ASKING 'Where should I look
next?', 'What should I DO?', 'What if I don't find it?' etc.

Run each pair by its self back and forth, this should take about 20
to 30 minutes per pair.

Or on a very advanced preclear run them all in a circle. The
preclear will tell you which one is THE ONE that is killing him, and it
may not be on the above list. Then run that one flat as a one sided
pancake.

I am making no effort to describe HOW TO RUN THESE ITEMS, other
than simply 'Get the idea of', because every auditor will have their own
orthodoxy to follow, they know how to run things, and how to handle
results and items that come up. No two auditors will run it exactly the
same.

As long as the preclear is 'getting the idea of looking for
something or someone', the process will run pretty much regardless of
what the auditor does barring auditor code breaks and auditing high
crimes which won't hurt the preclear any for long, but will hurt the
auditor because the preclear just won't come back for more.

Notice the NOT IS on looking for things is run by the first command
of the sequence. You DO NOT want to know WHAT he is not looking for,
you just want him to OPERATE NOT LOOKING FOR IT and continue to not know
what it is.

Thus you would never run "What are you trying to NOT find/see/know?",

Asking him what it is, makes him try to find it, rather than
duplicate NOT trying to find it.

If he is trying to not know something to save his life, believe
me he won't respond to what are you trying to not know.

Always run the not know as not know,

"Get the idea of not knowing something and not knowing what it
is you are not knowing!"

Running pure not-isness on a preclear can be hard because
he is always trying to look through it to find WHAT he is
not-ising, and is it really so bad etc.

Once he gets a glimpse of what he is not ising, he will stop that
nonsense and be very happy to recover his ability to not is something
and not know what it is, and not know he is not ising it and get back to
work for a while, until he stabilizes out.

WHAT he is not-ising any how will come down to

Something he is responsible for.
Something he is not repsonsible for.

Now we have a big problem with auditing much of which is based on
question asking, and looking for items. This is in part why most
WhatsIt/Itsa auditing restimulates more case than it is worth.

Sorry Ron, many clears can't run engrams, and many humans can't run
questions or even spotting, which is just more looking for.

The WHOLE BEING AND HIS ENTIRE BANK is convulsed up in looking for
things, and NOT looking for things, and you ask him to 'locate a moment
of pain and unconsciousness'.

Do you see how stupid and deadly this is?

"Hurry up and try harder to look for (item)".

Every question you ask the preclear or command to spot, fires up
his ENTIRE BANK to answer it.

Again your preclear will have told you during the first process
which one of these is most interesting to him, or he will have given you
a similar item not on the above list.

NO AND SOME

We have gone over this about 50 times by now, so its time we went
over it again.

Notice the NOT form is always run first following the laws of NO
and SOME. Get the NO off first before you go after the SOME. If you
are running solo on a meter and the needle goes dry, you have gotten out
of sync, repeat last command again, or double each one until needle
starts to read again.

NO SOME NO SOME (dry) SOME NO SOME NO

or worst case

NO SOME NO SOME (dry) SOME NO NO SOME SOME NO (reading again)

The word process below refers to what the bank is doing in flowing
back and forth, NOT what the auditor is doing to the preclear.

The auditor, in running a process on a preclear, must sync with the
process in the bank that the auditor is trying to run out.

Remember the process within the preclear is cycling between NO and
SOME whether or not the auditor is, thus it is the auditor's job to find
the sync and stay in sync as best he can to keep the needle reading.

If the internal process inside the preclear changes beat, the
auditor's NO and SOME will go out of sync.

If SOME doesn't read because the internal process went to NO, the
auditor had better NOT call NO, because the process will have gone back
to SOME by that time.

So if SOME doesn't read because the process is NO, the auditor
calls SOME AGAIN in the faith that the process will be waiting for him
at SOME also when the call is completed.

The process can change beat, or get delayed in changing state
because a prior NO or SOME wasn't fully discharged so the process may
get stuck in NO momentarily while the auditor went on to SOME. When
some doesn't read, and the auditor goes back to NO, the process may have
already changed to SOME thus jerking the auditor around.

That's why when some doesn't read you call SOME again.

If NO reads, DO NOT then echo "NO item?", because the process may
have moved to SOME already. This is why echo metering is a high crime.

NO NO SOME SOME NO NO SOME SOME will eventually get the process and
the auditor in sync again, even if the bank process is acting like a
drunk bucking bronco.

It is such a joy to get in sync with the bank and just watch the
needle rise and fall smoothly with each call like a great day at the
beach watching the waves come in regular rhythm.

The following is an example of a process starting off in sync,
going out of sync, and then being brought back into sync by the auditor,
duplicating the last command.

This is way too complex for dual auditing, because the preclear is
way too slow on answers to keep in sync with the bank process, which is
why dual auditing can be so painful, and why solo auditing becomes a
necessity at some point, but you will notice the preclear answering the
wrong question every now and then, and that means THAT is his sync
point.

For example, get the idea of

Nothing there.
Something there.

You ask for nothing there, preclear gives you something there.

Proper thing to do is to ask for nothing there again, because if
you ask for more something there, the preclear will again be back to
nothing there. Auditor's have to keep up with the preclear, not the
other way around.

The ? at the end of NO or SOME means the auditor has given the
auditing question, or command. Stay away from questions, the question
mark is only a symbol for the auditor's call.

Auditor's calls should always be a command if possible, get the
idea of, or spot if necessary, but not what is it?

Question type auditing *KILLS*, ruins cases and ARC breaks the
field.

We are trying to RUN OUT Questions and question asking of all
kinds, we do not do this by asking questions!

Run 'Get the idea of asking a question".

Or run "Spot a question."

NEVER EVER EVER run "What question is there or are you asking?"

Unless its a churchie.

The following is on get the idea of

Nothing there.
Something there.

Process Auditor Meter
State Call Read
-------------------------
NO NO? read
SOME SOME? read
NO NO? read
SOME SOME? read
SOME NO? dry Process state lagging, auditor moving on.
NO SOME? dry
SOME NO? dry
NO NO? read Auditor calls NO twice, nails it.
SOME SOME? read

This is very simple really, if the bank ticks, the auditor must
tick. If the bank tocks, the auditor must tock.

Or else the poor preclear will be building ridges until the cows
come home, and get the idea the meter doens't read or doesn't work.

Oh yeah, when the TA is high, its high for a REASON.

If the process and the auditor get out of sync, the auditor must
get back into sync by doing what he did last again.

Sometimes if the bank is really smashed and not running smoothly
the bank process can go into an indeterminate state for a few commands.
Thus you repeat NO NO SOME SOME NO NO SOME SOME until it gets back into
sync and starts reading and running again.

Process Auditor Meter
State Call Read
-------------------------
NO NO? read
SOME SOME? read
NO NO? read
SOME SOME? read
? NO? dry Bank process starts to misbehave
? NO? dry
? SOME? dry
? SOME? dry
SOME NO? dry Bank starts to behave again.
NO NO? read Sync finally established again.
SOME SOME? read
NO NO? read
SOME SOME? read

Homer


======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Mon Dec 28 20:15:40 EST 2015
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore934.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFWgd68URT1lqxE3HERApkwAJ9RNvIEyVwNesdKTuncGmRneazKtACdFXXY
VTXPJ2XUeOPmQkbZ8hZGLZk=
=+BGt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l

Re: Separateness

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


RUNNING SEPARATION

This is about the below attached posting by Hubbard.

Better to run,

Get the idea of being separate.

Get the idea of not being separate.

Or

Get the idea of NO separation.
Get the idea of SOME separation.

Powerful stuff, the joke is present theory will tell you
that the being is a God Soul, meaning one side of him is God
and the other is the Soul.

The God sides of all souls is the same God, but the soul side
of each soul is eternally individual.

Thus we say that the AllThatIS is a Multi I-AM being.

An infinite number of infinite minds...

This allows separate souls to interact and share dreams via
resonation between them, not outwardly through created dreamtime, MEST and
maya, bit inwardly using the God substrate that connects everyone.

Homer

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com

On Mon, 28 Dec 2015, Clearing Archive Roboposter wrote:

>
> R2-48 Separateness
>
> References
> Creation of Human Ability (R2-48)
>
> Description
> This is a key process attacking individuation. In his effort to control, a
> being spreads himself further and further from the universe, and in his
> failures to control, withdraws from things he has attempted to control but
> leaves himself connected with them in terms of "dead energy". Thus we get
> the manifestation "buttered all over the universe."
> This was the process that told me that we are not natively sprung from one
> "common body of theta". If you run separateness, accentuating the
> difference in unity of a being from other beings and things and spaces, he
> continues to gain in tone. If you run this process in reverse, how he is
> the same as, or is connected to various items, he continues to dwindle in
> tone. By handling this latter process, one can press a being down into the
> rock-bottom state of aberrations. We have long known that differentiation
> was the keynote of sanity, and that identification was the basis of
> aberration. This fact is utilized in processing by running separateness.
>
> It can be concluded that the being is an individual separate from every
> other being and that he has never been part of any other being. There are
> many "phony" incidents implanted on the track whereby an individual is made
> to feel that he is a result of an explosion having occurred to a larger
> body. He is also made to feel that he was at one time "whole" and is now
> only a splinter of himself. This is only an effort to reduce him. He has
> always been himself, he will always be himself, down to a time when he is
> entirely identified with this universe, at which time he would not longer
> be himself simply because he would no longer be conscious.
>
> It seems that aberration can only occur by enforcing Basic Truth. Here we
> discover that the individual, being separate, is then forced to be
> separate, and so develops a complex of "the only one" and tries to fend off
> the rest of the universe from himself and finally merges with it, with this
> impossibility of fending it off. All you have to do is accentuate truth and
> force it home as another determinism is order to create an aberration.
> There is some basic truth then, in whatever is wrong with a being, and of
> course the basic wrongness is that he is not a static.
>
> Separateness is best run by having the person out in an open place,
> inhabited by a great many people, as in R2-46 and R2-47.
>
>
> Commands
> "Point out some things from which you are separate."
> "Point out some more things from which you are separate."
>
>
> End Point
> Run the process until a realization occurs, or an ability is regained.
>
> Cautions
> None
>
> ================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
> Mon Dec 28 00:06:02 EST 2015
> ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/christine/Separateness
> Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help
> ================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
> Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
> Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
> Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
> Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning, but
> not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
> (607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
> homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
> _______________________________________________
> Clear-L mailing list
> Clear-L@mailman.lightlink.com
> http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/clear-l
>

======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Mon Dec 28 19:34:14 EST 2015
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore992.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFWgdUGURT1lqxE3HERAn6iAJ9G6m4jPHDQ5thI6zmOIKkvRDe1zQCdE2sf
3bUZFr1cu9MmriPWSDFIqA4=
=wbrg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l

ADORE48 (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


PERSISTENCE AND VANISHMENT AGAIN

CB Willis (cbwillis@adore.lightlink.com) wrote:
>This assumes that truth causes vanishment, and so far that hasn't been
>shown to most people's satisfaction - perhaps I should just speak for
>myself on that one. We could say that truth causes vanishment of
>ignorance. Or truth causes vanishment of falsehood. But your claim is far
>wider than that.

Yes, it is tempting to water down Scientology to fit one's own
needs for persistence. Thus people just don't 'get it', Scn that is.

They want a way to persist better, Scientology is not it.

The only real way to 'persist better' is to be more facile at
unpersisting things, both good and bad.

Trying to get good to persist and bad to vanish is a major
expanding trap. Mainly because all persisting good falls short of the
glory of vanishing truth.

The greatest beauty is just before you go out.

You just can't get there by staying in.

All manifestation, all conscious-of, is dream time, holographic
projections of MEST on the physical plane, and emotions, ideas and
higher stuff on higher planes.

Each manifestation in turn can be fully as-ised to complete
vanishment through the process of perfect duplication as Hubbard calls
it, or perfect replication or reoperation as Adore calls it.

The slightest alter-is of one's perception of the item will cause
it to continue to persist. Since ANY significance at all is alter-is,
one can see how things might hang around with people looking at them and
using them, desiring them, hating them, blaming them, wondering who
caused what, rather than getting the as-isness of them.

As-isness first vanishes one's own perception of the thing, one's
compulsive tuned-in-ness to the universe, but at a higher state it can
vanish anything, including force, matter, energy space and time, as they
are all dreams in this theory. This would be a full OT VIII as
originally envisioned.

There is only one mechanism of creation and that is as-isness, and
only one mechanism of destruction and that is as-isness, and only one
one mechanism of persistence and that is alter-is and not-is. Not-is is
a subset of alter-isness.

The true truth is nothing created. This is because creation came
second to eternal but unmanifesting being. But eternal beingness is not
eternal consciousness-of the way most people think, llike God is hanging
out in space listening to his angels singing forever and ever. No,
that's hell.

If you can imagine an unenforced sleep on the part of an infinite
being with all abilities intact but quiescing, in an undisturbable
unimpingable peace forever for free, you will have some idea of what the
static native state is.

WHY it moves into manifesting is not understandable, it is only
operable. It is however agreeable :)

The total knowingness is the quiescing sleeping God, it has perfect
innate competency, it 'knows' how to operate, how to move in and out of
manifestation. It has no ideas about this, no knowledge or know about,
it is conscious-of nothing in the unmanifested state.

The first consciousness-of, the first waking thought, the first
dreamtime colorform are the first creations. These do not hang around
unless the being engages in adding significance. They come and go like
fleeting images on the face of eternal peace, but once one is grabbed
onto and altered with significance, then they start to hang around and
coalesce into dreamtime for the being.

The being is Master and Apprehentice all wrapped into one, without
knowing anything about being either. It can just do it. It didn't have
to learn it, it can't teach it, it just knows how, the ability to
operate is built into the fundamental structure of its ground.

>> It is in part why true enlightenment is so scarce, people are
>>seeking a persisting truth rather than a vanishing truth.

>It would never occur to me to seek a vanishing truth. I would have never
>come up with that one in a million years.

Neither would I, which is why I owe Hubbard one.

Homer

>- CBW

- - --
- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth and Peace. Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sun Dec 27 12:06:01 EST 2015
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore48.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFWgBp5URT1lqxE3HERAh86AKC9zy37dZRwdaPSPh9174TVZHnHZgCgk5Rg
uFCpzlkENYgUEG8+lLNfW5k=
=QXkr
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Mon Dec 28 19:26:58 EST 2015
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore48.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFWgdNTURT1lqxE3HERAvUlAKCSN2p3k8B2vnlG8snkrAPLjkCM8gCaA2s2
o1HXbiSfcxZKQn7fGf4XVBI=
=G6Pz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l

ADORE274 (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


OUT THERENESS IS AN ILLUSION

Homer <homer@lightlink.com> wrote in message
> The out there-ness is an illusion.

Rogers. D.Scn. (The_Bindu@NOSPAMmsn.com) wrote:
>It's not as though I can't get the concept you're presenting here, Homer,
>it's just I don't understand why anybody would insist on contemplating
>considerations that collapse space?

The collapsing space means they are true.

Is truth not worth contemplating?

It puts responsibility for the creation of the illusion of space
back in the pc's hands. If he isn't up to that, he collapses as you
say. Very hard.

But we are creating OT's here, not noodle-oos, if an OT wants to be
exterior will full perception, he had better be able to put space "out
there", all of it and put it on automatic so it doesn't cave in on him
until he wants to exteriorize from space/time totally.

>Anybody who has a "case" is not going to be helped by collapsing space.
>(Hmmm, that rhymes.)
>One can't even have a key-out if one has no space.
>In fact, "no-space" is perhaps the common denominator of all types of
>"resistive case."

Right.

*ENFORCED* no space is the common denominator of all types of
resistive case.

*ENFORCED BASIC TRUTH* is the common denominator of all aberration.

Thus enforced no space is enforced basic truth, thus basic truth is
NO SPACE.

Even when he thinks he has space, he STILL doesn't actually have
space. He has instead something that LOOKS like space but which itself
does not take up any space. So space was never actual. Considering
space actual creates an alter-is of its true nature, which then causes
its persistence.

The being was making dream space just fine as illusion, became
convinced of its actuality on his own choice, resented the lie, began to
protest and withdraw from it, and eventually became a dot as Alan calls
them.

The being knows he can make dream space and is happy doing so.

He knows very well NOTHING could make actual space.

Once he believes space is actual, he fractures his connection with
having made it as dream space.

Then he has an ARCX of magnitude which can not be fixed, because
something he couldn't have created can't be destroyed by him either. So
he becomes owned by it, created by it, made out of it, and eventually a
meatball.

Once he realizes he is dreaming, he remembers that space is a
dreamtime illusion that itself doesn't take up any space, and thus he
can make it again, and MUST make it in order to not cave in, and he
starts to take over the automaticities he put up to keep space going on
'its own', and pretty soon he's OT exterior will full perception.

Homer

>Les.




======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Mon Dec 28 17:29:30 EST 2015
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore274.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFWgbfKURT1lqxE3HERAgHoAKC/O1NWEGHROPXSKbEmoZww9PgRqwCfUBit
yhWYUcXamDBtdXhJN+OkYo0=
=te2E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l

ADORE64 (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


BOYS AND BOMBS

Homer Wilson Smith (homer@lightlink.com) wrote:
> Truth is I hate women that don't know a MAN'S place in the
>world.

CB Willis (cbwillis@adore.lightlink.com) wrote:
>which is...where? what?

Well sugar tits, if you don't know, then you as a female are part
of the problem rather than part of the solution.

If you ever want to find THE point of *TOTAL* irresponsibility on a
woman's case just audit 'Boys and Bombs'. You will find they have
*NOTHING* to do with how men turn out.

Except the fags of course, in which case the mother sucessfully
demasculated them completely.

"I mean to have something come out of your cunt and not know
whether it will rape, kill or suck blood, must be something else."

-Adore

If a man is not operated BY a woman in his full capacity AS A
MAN, then the man will turn to war to wipe out the woman indirectly.

Anyhow to answer your question:

God Master of Total Responsibility
Man Master of Offense
Woman Master of Defense
Child Master of Total Irresponsibility

Each one graduates up to the next level, until the God graduates
into the Child at the next grade up.

It is not true that all men are better than all woman, it is true
that all men are better than all woman in the same and lower grade.

All women in a higher grade are better than all men in a lower
grade.

All children in a higher grade are better than all God, Men,
Woman and Children in a lower grade.

A grade consists of a full cycle of growth through the 4 phases of
child, woman, man and God in whatever arena or sphere of endeavor
applies.

The sex of a body is only vaguely related to the phase of an
endeavor, but the greatest happiness is attained when the sex of the
body is the same as the 'sex' of the major phase in their life, god,
man, woman or child.

Homer

>- CBW

======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Mon Dec 28 17:21:39 EST 2015
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore64.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFWgbXzURT1lqxE3HERAsE0AJwKi+BA7sDeZ4ww6U4FD9Ri4re85wCcD4ls
R0DCqTZlp0Pa3TnTpHDApF8=
=zley
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l