-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
THE CHRONIC CASE
A being in a body can not rest for long.
The call of duty and the impingement of life and survival
necessities force him to get up and do something constructive towards
those ends.
A body that is wounded needs to rest in order to heal. This can
be counter to the need to get up and go in order to survive.
But a body can also suffer from psychosomatic woundings that are
a result of the thetan body conflict going on between the two.
Psychosomatic woundings can be every much as wounding as physical
trauma. Cancers, lukemias, allergies, asthmas, environmental
sensitivities etc are all examples of this category.
Since they are being caused by what the thetan is DOING to the
body, one has to ask, should one heal them by doing or by not doing?
Acute psychosomatic woundings can heal in miraculous time once
the being stops causing them. So sometimes just getting a being to DO
something other than hurt the body can itself be a cure.
Chronic long term psychosomatic woundings can also heal in
miracle time, but often need an exact indication of whats going on to
get the being to stop hurting the body. This is where auditing comes
in.
Now work towards survival itself can be wounding, particularly if
the being has installed psychosomatic damage in the channels of
control. The more the guy works, the sicker he becomes.
It can even get to a point where SLEEP makes him ill, because the
psychomatic damage takes place during sleep where it is uncontrolled
and rampant. At least when he is awake he can WATCH himself do it,
when he is asleep its 8 or more hours of damage with no respite.
A common example of this is when a child decides to go to sleep
to forget some trauma going on in his life, and succeeds in doing so.
Forever afterwards sleep becomes an effort to forget charged events,
and thus of course sleep hurts the body because the concommittant
effort to forget kills it.
It takes a LOT of effort directed at the back of the brain and
awareness systems to shut out a memory for good.
Black V's are dead men walking.
So a being in a state of life threatening chronic psychosomatic
damage has to decide whether to do or not do, and if to do, what to
do.
He can't work normal survival channels because they make him
worse.
He can't just be still and do nothing, an effort to rest, because
that doesn't stop the damage either, its on automatic. And he is
getting further and further behind in his survival needs which starts
to drive him to hysteria and desperation.
So he turns to auditing which is a fix and repair detour to
getting on with survival.
Now most people who come into auditing are doing well in life,
they have charge around them but its not in restimulation, and so
periodically when it does get restimulated, they have reactions which
they would like to overcome.
Thus they sit down at the auditing table, the auditor quickly
gets an F/N on ruds, and then selectively starts to probe the
quiescent charge around the being for something that can be
restimulated, cleared and thus erased.
Auditing is like precision surgical bull bait.
After such actions the being has more free theta which is now
his, to enjoy life with, and has less fear of reaction because
he knows there is one less source of reaction hiding in his space to
dramatize him when it gets triggered.
But the other guy who is in a chronic state of damage is in a
very different state. He sits down at the table, and his TA is at
5.5. He can't float any ruds because his condition is a present time
problem of long duration that needs to be solved NOW or he won't
survive at all, particularly if its stopping him from working.
Now work itself might be some of the source of his chronic
restimulation, he might be very off purpose, at the end of a long GPM
opposing himself, and thus surviving in life by essentially throwing
his time in life away.
Maybe he gets to eat, but nothing real gets done and beings hate
that, subsistence level hand to mouth survival.
He may still be around or associated with the beings that came into
conflict with his originals goals that gave him purpose to live. In
this case he is under persistent present time suppression. He may even
WORK for such people and thus himself continuously be enhancing his
degraded being status.
Or maybe he LOST the beings that gave him purpose to live, and now
without them, he can't win.
In the first case, spotting the SP's in his environment can help
him get out from under their suppression of invention. The SP can be
very specific or very wide like 'the public at large'. He can stop
working for them, throw off the yoke of burden, and suddenly go very
free and become an easy to audit case.
In the second case, you have a deeper problem to solve, he has to
rehab his desire and confidence that he can rebuild his team and get on
with it.
If he lost his entire team, then everyone else he has been living
around is almost assuredly indifferent, unable to rise to, or opposed to
his goals or they would already have become a new team, and thus he will
be found to be PTS to everyone.
In any case the chronic somatic case and the easy to F/N case are
two completely different cases and need to be approached in different
ways.
The easy to F/N case just needs his next thing restimulated and
erased. The auditor doesn't have to know how to fix the case because
the guy is already fixed, he just needs preventative maintenance.
The chronic somatic case needs his entire present time
rehabilitated and handled, and no charge on his case will be available
to view until that is done. This takes an auditor who knows the
anatomy of ascent and descent upside down, forwards and backwards.
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Sat Sep 9 23:09:32 EDT 2006
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sat Oct 8 12:06:01 EDT 2016
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore393.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFX+RlqURT1lqxE3HERAvPYAJ9uPk71xkuLnxRY2RTGVDHv7WQEjgCg0agH
V9PaNpZLHZkEXO1AKkO8XgI=
=7ybs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Monday, October 10, 2016
ECO11 (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
OWNERSHIP vs STEWARDSHIP
>>I call it the "metaphysics penalty" plus "poor boundary awareness"
>>analogous to communism. What's yours is mine.
It is tempting to confuse the move from ownership to stewardship as
a move towards communism.
The primary problem with communism was central plan, having someone
tell you what you could make, who you could sell it to, and what you
could charge for it. As there is no single human being or group of
human beings smart enough to span an entire civlization and its markets,
this was doomed to failure, not to mention the seeping in of corruption,
tempation and seduction at the highest places of power. Pretty soon the
top level people are running the place for themselves at the expense of
everyone else.
In a free market, each person is allowed to make these decisions
himself, what to make, who to sell it to, and how much to charge.
It is tempting to consider that the RIGHT to do these things
comes from OWNERSHIP of the means of production and the product and
perhaps one find its hard to conceive how a free market can run in an
environment of stewardship rather than ownership. Certainly this
needs to be hashed out.
Ownership means rights of control.
Stewardship is more like a duty of guardainship with limited rights
of control as the steward never really owns the item he is guardian for.
For example people own stock, but give it over to their stock
broker to invest for them as stewards of the stock.
I bring you back to the forest and the boat. Ownership of land is
probably one of the most fudamental and most ridiculous basis of
production and product ownership, because ultimately everything comes
from the land. Who owns the land? Those that take it by force, end of
story.
Now you consider a more spiritual concept that everyone owns the
land, then everyone owns the tree in the forest. Who then owns the boat
invented by and made by one man from the tree?
Do not the people who own the tree the boat was made from, and who
supported and put the civilization there so the man could invent and
make the boat, have some claim to the boat?
The arguements between total ownership and total slavery tend to
leave out a middle path that is more favorable to spiritual development,
probably best described by stewardship, but not completely delineated by
it.
Lots of non producers would love to have everyone own everything,
so they can suck off the work of the producers. These of course push
things towards very tight ownership in the name of "I produced it, so I
own it so you have no rights to it!"
Giving sway to the non producers leads to welfare states at the
point of a gun aimed at the producers, which by definition is a form of
communism, "from each according to his ability and to each according to
his need." But who determines ability and need? So we have a central
government again, which pushes the 'welfare of the people' party line,
while actually lining their own pockets with the protectorship scam.
A protector is one who says something is good for you, when in
fact it is good for them at your expense, and they know it.
Their primary interest is to protect you from the truth in order to
protect themselves by keeping their slavery of you in working order.
Protectors running a protectorship scam are probably the closest
definition of evil there is.
Homer
======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Mon Oct 10 16:25:42 EDT 2016
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/eco11.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFX+/lGURT1lqxE3HERAuZpAJ9BcNfGYOeudHO8hldfGC0PEbtPygCfUq8f
gLF63WqquDhS+ii/FU6xwzk=
=nzgo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
OWNERSHIP vs STEWARDSHIP
>>I call it the "metaphysics penalty" plus "poor boundary awareness"
>>analogous to communism. What's yours is mine.
It is tempting to confuse the move from ownership to stewardship as
a move towards communism.
The primary problem with communism was central plan, having someone
tell you what you could make, who you could sell it to, and what you
could charge for it. As there is no single human being or group of
human beings smart enough to span an entire civlization and its markets,
this was doomed to failure, not to mention the seeping in of corruption,
tempation and seduction at the highest places of power. Pretty soon the
top level people are running the place for themselves at the expense of
everyone else.
In a free market, each person is allowed to make these decisions
himself, what to make, who to sell it to, and how much to charge.
It is tempting to consider that the RIGHT to do these things
comes from OWNERSHIP of the means of production and the product and
perhaps one find its hard to conceive how a free market can run in an
environment of stewardship rather than ownership. Certainly this
needs to be hashed out.
Ownership means rights of control.
Stewardship is more like a duty of guardainship with limited rights
of control as the steward never really owns the item he is guardian for.
For example people own stock, but give it over to their stock
broker to invest for them as stewards of the stock.
I bring you back to the forest and the boat. Ownership of land is
probably one of the most fudamental and most ridiculous basis of
production and product ownership, because ultimately everything comes
from the land. Who owns the land? Those that take it by force, end of
story.
Now you consider a more spiritual concept that everyone owns the
land, then everyone owns the tree in the forest. Who then owns the boat
invented by and made by one man from the tree?
Do not the people who own the tree the boat was made from, and who
supported and put the civilization there so the man could invent and
make the boat, have some claim to the boat?
The arguements between total ownership and total slavery tend to
leave out a middle path that is more favorable to spiritual development,
probably best described by stewardship, but not completely delineated by
it.
Lots of non producers would love to have everyone own everything,
so they can suck off the work of the producers. These of course push
things towards very tight ownership in the name of "I produced it, so I
own it so you have no rights to it!"
Giving sway to the non producers leads to welfare states at the
point of a gun aimed at the producers, which by definition is a form of
communism, "from each according to his ability and to each according to
his need." But who determines ability and need? So we have a central
government again, which pushes the 'welfare of the people' party line,
while actually lining their own pockets with the protectorship scam.
A protector is one who says something is good for you, when in
fact it is good for them at your expense, and they know it.
Their primary interest is to protect you from the truth in order to
protect themselves by keeping their slavery of you in working order.
Protectors running a protectorship scam are probably the closest
definition of evil there is.
Homer
======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Mon Oct 10 16:25:42 EDT 2016
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/eco11.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFX+/lGURT1lqxE3HERAuZpAJ9BcNfGYOeudHO8hldfGC0PEbtPygCfUq8f
gLF63WqquDhS+ii/FU6xwzk=
=nzgo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Thursday, October 6, 2016
ADORE93 (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
SPIRIT OF PLAY
Kathie Lynch (kathielynch@home.com) wrote:
>Hi Homer,
> Thanks for answering my question. What I've been saying all
along >is that competition in a 2D (family) is ok if it's light and in
the >spirit of play. Games on every dynamic would be more fun that way.
>Wouldn't it be great if nations could operate in a non-serious,
>non-aberrative way? That seems even hard to imagine in this day and
>age. Damn!! Most 2D's can't even operate that way! Oh well, someday.
>We'll just make sure ours do! Thanks for your communication. >
Dramatization contains 4 components,
Seriousness, permanence, importance and pain.
People don't get along because they see others causing permanent
losses to the world, so they attack back by causing permanent losses
themselves to the causers of permanent losses.
Vanquish the vanquishers.
It gets quite insane when one group of religious bigots tries to
help their God by doing in another group of people.
Religious bigotry is 'I am going to Heaven and you are going to
Hell because my God/Doctrine/Lineage is better than yours.
Hell FOREVER is a form of permanence, as is Heaven forever.
Nothing is forever except people and peace. So really if one just
looks to where people are dramatizing forevers (in time), one will see
the serious games they are playing where winning is more important than
playing.
That is the cause of all the strife (unhappy game playing) there is
amongst people.
They are trying to reach eternity (forever above time) by enforcing
or inhibiting immortality (forever in time) whether good or bad.
Spirit of Play falls downtone into Spirit of Winning and further
down into Spirit of Losing.
Homer
======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Thu Oct 6 17:15:13 EDT 2016
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore93.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFX9r7hURT1lqxE3HERAuT8AJ9DaoCE54wtfwgUCsn+99mpiDpe8QCfSqGS
8X362KQOPpqfsP5Z7WldJEk=
=GBTw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
SPIRIT OF PLAY
Kathie Lynch (kathielynch@home.com) wrote:
>Hi Homer,
> Thanks for answering my question. What I've been saying all
along >is that competition in a 2D (family) is ok if it's light and in
the >spirit of play. Games on every dynamic would be more fun that way.
>Wouldn't it be great if nations could operate in a non-serious,
>non-aberrative way? That seems even hard to imagine in this day and
>age. Damn!! Most 2D's can't even operate that way! Oh well, someday.
>We'll just make sure ours do! Thanks for your communication. >
Dramatization contains 4 components,
Seriousness, permanence, importance and pain.
People don't get along because they see others causing permanent
losses to the world, so they attack back by causing permanent losses
themselves to the causers of permanent losses.
Vanquish the vanquishers.
It gets quite insane when one group of religious bigots tries to
help their God by doing in another group of people.
Religious bigotry is 'I am going to Heaven and you are going to
Hell because my God/Doctrine/Lineage is better than yours.
Hell FOREVER is a form of permanence, as is Heaven forever.
Nothing is forever except people and peace. So really if one just
looks to where people are dramatizing forevers (in time), one will see
the serious games they are playing where winning is more important than
playing.
That is the cause of all the strife (unhappy game playing) there is
amongst people.
They are trying to reach eternity (forever above time) by enforcing
or inhibiting immortality (forever in time) whether good or bad.
Spirit of Play falls downtone into Spirit of Winning and further
down into Spirit of Losing.
Homer
======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Thu Oct 6 17:15:13 EDT 2016
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore93.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFX9r7hURT1lqxE3HERAuT8AJ9DaoCE54wtfwgUCsn+99mpiDpe8QCfSqGS
8X362KQOPpqfsP5Z7WldJEk=
=GBTw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Wednesday, October 5, 2016
ADORE857 (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> Saying Hubbard is crap is a (quote) "good" stable datum for the
> confusion of one's own failed case. Also it makes Hubbard wrong and
> self right. Where's the impartiality and open-mindedness here?
That's making you and Hubbard right and me wrong.
Who or what is responsible for the confusion of my own
failed case?
Hubbard was the grand make wrong fuck meister of all time.
And that is what YOU dramatize when you go being cramming
officer to other's postings.
Earn the right. Your certs from the Church are meaningless, best
used as toilet paper.
POST something YOU discovered and ran.
Preferably something that goes beyond Hubbard to show us your head
isn't stuck up Hubbard's ass in philosophical necrophelia and that your
mind isn't owned and operated by the Tech Police at Flag.
Homer
Sat Mar 5 18:00:23 EST 2011
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Wed Oct 5 12:06:01 EDT 2016
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore857.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFX9STqURT1lqxE3HERAukfAJwOeZm7aSIjKN+TLmTZRRfXuTh6xgCgtPne
2vejSnqHjdPdri0zi2IlcIk=
=NaSK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
> Saying Hubbard is crap is a (quote) "good" stable datum for the
> confusion of one's own failed case. Also it makes Hubbard wrong and
> self right. Where's the impartiality and open-mindedness here?
That's making you and Hubbard right and me wrong.
Who or what is responsible for the confusion of my own
failed case?
Hubbard was the grand make wrong fuck meister of all time.
And that is what YOU dramatize when you go being cramming
officer to other's postings.
Earn the right. Your certs from the Church are meaningless, best
used as toilet paper.
POST something YOU discovered and ran.
Preferably something that goes beyond Hubbard to show us your head
isn't stuck up Hubbard's ass in philosophical necrophelia and that your
mind isn't owned and operated by the Tech Police at Flag.
Homer
Sat Mar 5 18:00:23 EST 2011
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Wed Oct 5 12:06:01 EDT 2016
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore857.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFX9STqURT1lqxE3HERAukfAJwOeZm7aSIjKN+TLmTZRRfXuTh6xgCgtPne
2vejSnqHjdPdri0zi2IlcIk=
=NaSK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Tuesday, October 4, 2016
ADORE389 (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
CHILD OF THE 1950's
A very good posting from the motivator side of things. A 1950's
child has a lot to cope with, the draft and atomic war not the least of
them, including the institutionalized bigotry of Christian-inanity, and
the other religious inanities all vying to send each other to hell ahead
of time, can't wait for the armageddon, where's the button I want to
push it NOW, kind of mentality.
It is quite bad enough when the child with all his allies and
friends have to face the onslaught of planetary insanity in the zombie
zone, and its even worse when the child's parents, teachers, friends,
and government are themselves zombie zoners.
Then the child gets into an only one condition, "I against the
world" and he knows he can not win, but can at least take out a few of
the enemy with kamikazee. 'If I gotta die, I might as well take out one
of the enemy with me'. - Adore.
Thus doing an inventory of terror and desperate futures might be a
good idea.
Maybe you could 'open a case' with all this, surely you could get
someone to talk his havingness down forever on the utter unspoken
enormity of how bad it is out there living amonst the 'life is grand'
zombie zoners, but I don't think any real case gain will be made because
it is all flow 1.
((One needs to run what solutions he has had to the incoming flow 1
motivators, that will run his havingness up rather than down. This is a
covert form of running flow 2's, but more direct to the flow 1 under
consideration, because each solution IS a flow 2 overt.))
Flow 1 goes no where except into the pc's face.
The pc knows he can't confront it, and he's right.
Only the flow2 and the flow0 make the flow 1 make sense and allow
it to resolve.
There are two critical questions that a pc has to ask.
Where am I, and what am I doing here?
More specifically he needs to audit two choices.
The choice to become associated with bodies and eventually control
them from the inside.
The choice to BE a body in his own mind, forgetting his first
choice.
Viewer of dimension points becomes a dimension point to be viewed.
There is a lot worse stuff on the track than what is going on here
on Earth. One can run motivators for ever.
But the being is out of contact with WHY he is involved with
bodies, and has finally come to make a virtue out of a horrible
'necessity'. "We need suffering to experience pleasure."
The hell we do.
The mortal meat case is also further out of contact with his choice
to forget his choices and become a body completely as if he was nothing
else.
The first state is probably auditable by most people and with
extant technologies, the second state is, in my opinion, beyond anyone
at this time.
Homer
coffeycup said:
> Part of the problem, is that we are living in a very suppressive
>environment, there are a ton of enforced ignorances out there. At any
>time, place or event, these ignorances can be forced upon you. For
>any being, living in a humanoid enviroment is a stressful, and stress
>filled experience. The future for the meat body cannot be assured,
>the plans and objectives cannot be guaranteed to be fulfilled. It is
>a problem of comparable magnitude, to auditing a case, confronting a
>case, and getting any case gain, staying alive. You are auditing in a
>PTS state, PTS to the environment around you. And the more people
>there are, the more randomnity there is, the more likely you feel the
>walls of this machine-robot-human ignorant attack-dog reality will
>close in on you. None of this is conducive to survival, intelligence,
>happyness, well- ness, stability, case gain, auditing or other.
>
> This is the unresolved issue facing all auditors, and all PC's
>and any case at all. The environment.
>
> At any moment, the Psychs could be given unfettered powers to
>claim anything about anyone one at anytime, and treatments with a
>covertly hostile or docile ignorant face given to your detriment. As
>most case gain phenomenon, and ability gain would be considered to be
>psychosis, or psychotic. Fun hah? This is the environment you are
>living in, and it is amazing many of you survive at all.
>
> Be aware of your auditing environment drills would come in handy,
>bringing up to the surface, to view, the deep hidden unconscious fears
>of being made the effect of the robopathic hostile, and
>sociopathically hostile environment around you. These items will be
>found on anycase, that is low in awareness, deep hidden fears and
>terrors related to their present-time environment, as well as memories
>of the environment, and future prospects in that environment; sort of
>GPM items, unconscious, hidden, in restimulation, by-passed charged,
>on the environment, and the viewpoint of that being related to their
>physical vessel, their body, their survival, identifications with,
>hiding from, black-cat forms (see scientology dictionary), past,
>present and future. Auditing being about the accessing of items, and
>the attention put on those items, without all kinds of other items of
>charge coming into it, drug-case, enturbulation, particles,
>comm-cycle, file clerk.
>
> That's what a Bridge is about, a gradient of confront, a gradient
>of handlings of present time environment problems, and then auditing
>the case, the memories.
>
> Problem, the reason they have a case, is that they have been
>forced to obey rules, have had barriers and restrictions, enforce,
>inhibit, deny; consistently and in restimulation by the group, on the
>individual, closing in their space, and making them effect. Solution,
>is uknown. Dynamics, interactions, have been other-determined, their
>1st dynamic has been squashed and made invalid, by various of the
>other dynamics.
>
> There are some unordered thoughts on the subject of auditing.
>And all the time the other robots want you to conform, obey, submit,
>fit in, follow, and be happy about it.
Fri Sep 8 23:42:01 EDT 2006
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Tue Oct 4 12:06:01 EDT 2016
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore389.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFX89NqURT1lqxE3HERAid5AJ9ChhNPUe3VTg93lEsA1Zrgi0vSmQCgvfmg
YSoauHt9lyw9S/0JIZwHV7o=
=EhtK
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Tue Oct 4 15:54:50 EDT 2016
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore389.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFX9AkKURT1lqxE3HERAkIVAJ4uVpEoqBE5mwigs/s+sZfNpD535wCbBAn9
BylKYfAW3WicbLoeUGPi7cs=
=FFkw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
CHILD OF THE 1950's
A very good posting from the motivator side of things. A 1950's
child has a lot to cope with, the draft and atomic war not the least of
them, including the institutionalized bigotry of Christian-inanity, and
the other religious inanities all vying to send each other to hell ahead
of time, can't wait for the armageddon, where's the button I want to
push it NOW, kind of mentality.
It is quite bad enough when the child with all his allies and
friends have to face the onslaught of planetary insanity in the zombie
zone, and its even worse when the child's parents, teachers, friends,
and government are themselves zombie zoners.
Then the child gets into an only one condition, "I against the
world" and he knows he can not win, but can at least take out a few of
the enemy with kamikazee. 'If I gotta die, I might as well take out one
of the enemy with me'. - Adore.
Thus doing an inventory of terror and desperate futures might be a
good idea.
Maybe you could 'open a case' with all this, surely you could get
someone to talk his havingness down forever on the utter unspoken
enormity of how bad it is out there living amonst the 'life is grand'
zombie zoners, but I don't think any real case gain will be made because
it is all flow 1.
((One needs to run what solutions he has had to the incoming flow 1
motivators, that will run his havingness up rather than down. This is a
covert form of running flow 2's, but more direct to the flow 1 under
consideration, because each solution IS a flow 2 overt.))
Flow 1 goes no where except into the pc's face.
The pc knows he can't confront it, and he's right.
Only the flow2 and the flow0 make the flow 1 make sense and allow
it to resolve.
There are two critical questions that a pc has to ask.
Where am I, and what am I doing here?
More specifically he needs to audit two choices.
The choice to become associated with bodies and eventually control
them from the inside.
The choice to BE a body in his own mind, forgetting his first
choice.
Viewer of dimension points becomes a dimension point to be viewed.
There is a lot worse stuff on the track than what is going on here
on Earth. One can run motivators for ever.
But the being is out of contact with WHY he is involved with
bodies, and has finally come to make a virtue out of a horrible
'necessity'. "We need suffering to experience pleasure."
The hell we do.
The mortal meat case is also further out of contact with his choice
to forget his choices and become a body completely as if he was nothing
else.
The first state is probably auditable by most people and with
extant technologies, the second state is, in my opinion, beyond anyone
at this time.
Homer
coffeycup said:
> Part of the problem, is that we are living in a very suppressive
>environment, there are a ton of enforced ignorances out there. At any
>time, place or event, these ignorances can be forced upon you. For
>any being, living in a humanoid enviroment is a stressful, and stress
>filled experience. The future for the meat body cannot be assured,
>the plans and objectives cannot be guaranteed to be fulfilled. It is
>a problem of comparable magnitude, to auditing a case, confronting a
>case, and getting any case gain, staying alive. You are auditing in a
>PTS state, PTS to the environment around you. And the more people
>there are, the more randomnity there is, the more likely you feel the
>walls of this machine-robot-human ignorant attack-dog reality will
>close in on you. None of this is conducive to survival, intelligence,
>happyness, well- ness, stability, case gain, auditing or other.
>
> This is the unresolved issue facing all auditors, and all PC's
>and any case at all. The environment.
>
> At any moment, the Psychs could be given unfettered powers to
>claim anything about anyone one at anytime, and treatments with a
>covertly hostile or docile ignorant face given to your detriment. As
>most case gain phenomenon, and ability gain would be considered to be
>psychosis, or psychotic. Fun hah? This is the environment you are
>living in, and it is amazing many of you survive at all.
>
> Be aware of your auditing environment drills would come in handy,
>bringing up to the surface, to view, the deep hidden unconscious fears
>of being made the effect of the robopathic hostile, and
>sociopathically hostile environment around you. These items will be
>found on anycase, that is low in awareness, deep hidden fears and
>terrors related to their present-time environment, as well as memories
>of the environment, and future prospects in that environment; sort of
>GPM items, unconscious, hidden, in restimulation, by-passed charged,
>on the environment, and the viewpoint of that being related to their
>physical vessel, their body, their survival, identifications with,
>hiding from, black-cat forms (see scientology dictionary), past,
>present and future. Auditing being about the accessing of items, and
>the attention put on those items, without all kinds of other items of
>charge coming into it, drug-case, enturbulation, particles,
>comm-cycle, file clerk.
>
> That's what a Bridge is about, a gradient of confront, a gradient
>of handlings of present time environment problems, and then auditing
>the case, the memories.
>
> Problem, the reason they have a case, is that they have been
>forced to obey rules, have had barriers and restrictions, enforce,
>inhibit, deny; consistently and in restimulation by the group, on the
>individual, closing in their space, and making them effect. Solution,
>is uknown. Dynamics, interactions, have been other-determined, their
>1st dynamic has been squashed and made invalid, by various of the
>other dynamics.
>
> There are some unordered thoughts on the subject of auditing.
>And all the time the other robots want you to conform, obey, submit,
>fit in, follow, and be happy about it.
Fri Sep 8 23:42:01 EDT 2006
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Tue Oct 4 12:06:01 EDT 2016
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore389.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFX89NqURT1lqxE3HERAid5AJ9ChhNPUe3VTg93lEsA1Zrgi0vSmQCgvfmg
YSoauHt9lyw9S/0JIZwHV7o=
=EhtK
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Tue Oct 4 15:54:50 EDT 2016
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore389.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFX9AkKURT1lqxE3HERAkIVAJ4uVpEoqBE5mwigs/s+sZfNpD535wCbBAn9
BylKYfAW3WicbLoeUGPi7cs=
=FFkw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Monday, October 3, 2016
SCI27 (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
SESSION ON SOVEREIGNTY
I would prefer that clearing be considered a religious practice,
not for the tax benefits, but to keep it out of the hands of state
control and oversight.
Clearing is a body of knowledge concerning the anatomy of and
approach to what ails man. As such it is a growing science just like
any other science based upon the standard theory of theory. That such a
science leads into religious discoveries like the existence of perfect
certainty, and the impossibility of perfect certainty in a space time
continuum, and thus the possibly divine nature of zero dimensional
consciousness, well then so be it.
Religion then would be a DISCOVERY of science, get it?
Thus we posit that clearing could produce a bridge between religion
and science and perhaps unify the two one day.
Rather than faith and science being opposed, faith would become
just another item under science AND religion.
The below posting was written before the posting on TRIAD, which
clarifies the distinction between eternality, immortality and mortality.
TRIAD
http://www.clearing.org/cgi/archive.cgi?/homer/help0
Thus by immortality in this posting we almost assuredly meant
eternality.
Homer
- - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
SESSION ON SOVEREIGNTY
SCI - 27
Copyright (C) 1992 Homer Wilson Smith
Redistribution rights granted for non commercial purposes.
I just came out of session running,
'Tell me about Sovereignty'
'What problem would it solve?'
'What problem would it present?'
'Tell me about Mortality'
'What problem does it solve?'
'What problem does it present?'
'Mortality' meaning the state of an immortal being who thinks he is
mortal.
I had a few cognitions on the subject of clearing technology and
whether it is a religion or a science or neither.
Suppose I am just walking down the street and one day I have this
big cognition to the effect that people are suffering from their past,
because they have managed to suppress efforts, emotions, ideas, and
personal responsibility on many of the subjects that hurt them during
their lives.
I also get the idea that if I could just get someone to TALK about
what they were suppressing, rather than suppress it, they would release
all those pent up efforts, emotions, ideas and irresponsibilities on the
subject and they would recover.
In otherwords I figure, maybe trying to nail out of existence all
this stuff for a whole life time leads to many persisting and perhaps
even deadly psychosomatic conditions in the body, heart, mind and soul,
and when someone is allowed to get it all off their chest and reevaluate
their present time, it all goes away and heals. Often with great
catharsis and relief.
Now this is nothing new, right?
You have heard it a million times before.
Ok, so being the bright little devil that I am, I devise one single
technique for producing the results I am looking for. That technique or
'technology' as I would prefer to call it consists of exactly two
questions asked over and over again until the catharsis happens and the
client is happy with the results.
This is evidenced by the fact that the client pays me and wants to
make an appointment for more.
Those two questions are,
'What suffering has there been?'
'What have you not said or expressed about that suffering?'
So I find a few people and experiment with these two questions on
them to see if it really works. Indeed it apparently does and so I form
a new group, the Psychoamelioriation Center for Advanced Healing.
I charge $50 an hour for my time, and I pay taxes.
Now one day I am running this process on someone and some nosey
onlooker hears,
Auditor: 'What suffering has there been?'
Pc: 'Well I have felt abandoned by God, and pursued by the
Devil, I don't want to die, but I have visions of
Immortality that scare the hell out of me.
Auditor: 'Thank you'
Auditor: 'What have you not said about that suffering?'
Pc: 'Well, I hate God, and I have confusions on mortality
and Sovereignty and surprise and scarcity of surprise etc.
and I haven't told anyone about this but I have started
my own religion called The Order of the Adorian Creed,
and I am afraid of getting out of my body and, uh, are
you SURE I should be talking about all this stuff? I was
doing just fine for years keeping it all to myself.
Auditor: 'Thank you, please continue...'
Pc: 'Oh well, oh yes and I used to do a lot of acid, and during
the last trip the whole world got kind of thin, and I
felt there was this huge thin veil hanging
between me and the universe, and if I ever tripped again,
well, that veil would drop and I would
be face to face with Brahma, Shiva and Vishnu, and I
decided I had better not do acid anymore...'
Auditor: 'Thank you.
Auditor: 'What suffering has there been?'
etc.
Now suddenly someone comes crashing into the room, and says 'See
you are talking about God, and the Devil, and Immortality and
Sovereignty (what's that anyway) and that's all about RELIGION now isn't
it, you slime dogs, I TOLD you so, therefore you ARE a religion, how
DARE you say you are a technology of psychoamelioration, HAH!'
But the facts are only that one client was talking about God and
the Devil and HE brought it up, not the practioner. Others talk about
the army or their physics teachers or their mother in law or Uncle
Charlie who raped them as a kid or whatever.
So the fact remains that when people are run on clearing technology
deep enough for long enough some eventually wax religious, or at least
divine and supernatural. They start to have visions of Beauty, and also
of great evil, of infinite good and divine humor.
Some of them even mention very furtively that they are not alone,
and that there are a number of other very unhappy beings in their space
and body.
Some clients contact something that they call Source which seems to
be the emanation point of tremendous unfathomable intelligence, and
power and purpose, and they begin to understand how they have been
operating that Source all their lives without skill or real
understanding, causing many bad effects that were unintended.
'Hey don't ask me, I just work here' says the practioner.
Other clients just straighten out their lives and go back to work
more able to get along with their bosses, or wives, or no longer
suffering from headaches, or various addictions.
However sometimes you do run into a bunch of advanced Clear
Techies, who are yapping away about supernatural things, and so
onlookers say, 'See you are a religion, we TOLD you so. (smug, smug,
smug.)
No. It just ain't true.
ADORE is a religion, A Divine Operating REligion.
That's MY religion.
Clearing Technology is a TECHNOLOGY for relieving what ever a
person has suppressed, not-ised or is not saying or not talking about.
If it turns out your client is a star maker from the Adorian Star
Class of beings, then so be it.
That don't make you or your technology a religion.
That makes HIM a religion.
Many others will just be auto mechanics or nuclear physicists.
But they're a religion too, they just have not applied for tax
exemption status.
Homer
======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Mon Oct 3 15:38:54 EDT 2016
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/sci27.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFX8rPOURT1lqxE3HERAs+gAJsGyNqMx3d8SLu6BGY5jiGsfw10QwCcCqT7
vJvmGoN7YVlcYF8MjNX/oRc=
=+Llq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
SESSION ON SOVEREIGNTY
I would prefer that clearing be considered a religious practice,
not for the tax benefits, but to keep it out of the hands of state
control and oversight.
Clearing is a body of knowledge concerning the anatomy of and
approach to what ails man. As such it is a growing science just like
any other science based upon the standard theory of theory. That such a
science leads into religious discoveries like the existence of perfect
certainty, and the impossibility of perfect certainty in a space time
continuum, and thus the possibly divine nature of zero dimensional
consciousness, well then so be it.
Religion then would be a DISCOVERY of science, get it?
Thus we posit that clearing could produce a bridge between religion
and science and perhaps unify the two one day.
Rather than faith and science being opposed, faith would become
just another item under science AND religion.
The below posting was written before the posting on TRIAD, which
clarifies the distinction between eternality, immortality and mortality.
TRIAD
http://www.clearing.org/cgi/archive.cgi?/homer/help0
Thus by immortality in this posting we almost assuredly meant
eternality.
Homer
- - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
SESSION ON SOVEREIGNTY
SCI - 27
Copyright (C) 1992 Homer Wilson Smith
Redistribution rights granted for non commercial purposes.
I just came out of session running,
'Tell me about Sovereignty'
'What problem would it solve?'
'What problem would it present?'
'Tell me about Mortality'
'What problem does it solve?'
'What problem does it present?'
'Mortality' meaning the state of an immortal being who thinks he is
mortal.
I had a few cognitions on the subject of clearing technology and
whether it is a religion or a science or neither.
Suppose I am just walking down the street and one day I have this
big cognition to the effect that people are suffering from their past,
because they have managed to suppress efforts, emotions, ideas, and
personal responsibility on many of the subjects that hurt them during
their lives.
I also get the idea that if I could just get someone to TALK about
what they were suppressing, rather than suppress it, they would release
all those pent up efforts, emotions, ideas and irresponsibilities on the
subject and they would recover.
In otherwords I figure, maybe trying to nail out of existence all
this stuff for a whole life time leads to many persisting and perhaps
even deadly psychosomatic conditions in the body, heart, mind and soul,
and when someone is allowed to get it all off their chest and reevaluate
their present time, it all goes away and heals. Often with great
catharsis and relief.
Now this is nothing new, right?
You have heard it a million times before.
Ok, so being the bright little devil that I am, I devise one single
technique for producing the results I am looking for. That technique or
'technology' as I would prefer to call it consists of exactly two
questions asked over and over again until the catharsis happens and the
client is happy with the results.
This is evidenced by the fact that the client pays me and wants to
make an appointment for more.
Those two questions are,
'What suffering has there been?'
'What have you not said or expressed about that suffering?'
So I find a few people and experiment with these two questions on
them to see if it really works. Indeed it apparently does and so I form
a new group, the Psychoamelioriation Center for Advanced Healing.
I charge $50 an hour for my time, and I pay taxes.
Now one day I am running this process on someone and some nosey
onlooker hears,
Auditor: 'What suffering has there been?'
Pc: 'Well I have felt abandoned by God, and pursued by the
Devil, I don't want to die, but I have visions of
Immortality that scare the hell out of me.
Auditor: 'Thank you'
Auditor: 'What have you not said about that suffering?'
Pc: 'Well, I hate God, and I have confusions on mortality
and Sovereignty and surprise and scarcity of surprise etc.
and I haven't told anyone about this but I have started
my own religion called The Order of the Adorian Creed,
and I am afraid of getting out of my body and, uh, are
you SURE I should be talking about all this stuff? I was
doing just fine for years keeping it all to myself.
Auditor: 'Thank you, please continue...'
Pc: 'Oh well, oh yes and I used to do a lot of acid, and during
the last trip the whole world got kind of thin, and I
felt there was this huge thin veil hanging
between me and the universe, and if I ever tripped again,
well, that veil would drop and I would
be face to face with Brahma, Shiva and Vishnu, and I
decided I had better not do acid anymore...'
Auditor: 'Thank you.
Auditor: 'What suffering has there been?'
etc.
Now suddenly someone comes crashing into the room, and says 'See
you are talking about God, and the Devil, and Immortality and
Sovereignty (what's that anyway) and that's all about RELIGION now isn't
it, you slime dogs, I TOLD you so, therefore you ARE a religion, how
DARE you say you are a technology of psychoamelioration, HAH!'
But the facts are only that one client was talking about God and
the Devil and HE brought it up, not the practioner. Others talk about
the army or their physics teachers or their mother in law or Uncle
Charlie who raped them as a kid or whatever.
So the fact remains that when people are run on clearing technology
deep enough for long enough some eventually wax religious, or at least
divine and supernatural. They start to have visions of Beauty, and also
of great evil, of infinite good and divine humor.
Some of them even mention very furtively that they are not alone,
and that there are a number of other very unhappy beings in their space
and body.
Some clients contact something that they call Source which seems to
be the emanation point of tremendous unfathomable intelligence, and
power and purpose, and they begin to understand how they have been
operating that Source all their lives without skill or real
understanding, causing many bad effects that were unintended.
'Hey don't ask me, I just work here' says the practioner.
Other clients just straighten out their lives and go back to work
more able to get along with their bosses, or wives, or no longer
suffering from headaches, or various addictions.
However sometimes you do run into a bunch of advanced Clear
Techies, who are yapping away about supernatural things, and so
onlookers say, 'See you are a religion, we TOLD you so. (smug, smug,
smug.)
No. It just ain't true.
ADORE is a religion, A Divine Operating REligion.
That's MY religion.
Clearing Technology is a TECHNOLOGY for relieving what ever a
person has suppressed, not-ised or is not saying or not talking about.
If it turns out your client is a star maker from the Adorian Star
Class of beings, then so be it.
That don't make you or your technology a religion.
That makes HIM a religion.
Many others will just be auto mechanics or nuclear physicists.
But they're a religion too, they just have not applied for tax
exemption status.
Homer
======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Mon Oct 3 15:38:54 EDT 2016
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/sci27.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFX8rPOURT1lqxE3HERAs+gAJsGyNqMx3d8SLu6BGY5jiGsfw10QwCcCqT7
vJvmGoN7YVlcYF8MjNX/oRc=
=+Llq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Sunday, October 2, 2016
ADORE118 (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
TAKING BACK RESPONSIBILITY
Since an as-isness is a perfect replication of what was originally
created, if one has handed out responsibility to lots of vias and causal
terminals like other beings etc, then one must hand it all out again
just as one did before in order to retract it all.
Taking back responsibility means re delegating responsibility back
out correctly to everyone involved.
You are taking back responsibility for DELEGATING RESPONSIBILITY,
assigning cause to other beings. Thus you can take back your
delegation.
The being who is saying "I did it all" is refusing responsibility
for delegation of responsibility and cause.
The thetan dying at the bottom of the tone scale is going first
"You did this all to me!" and then "I am doing this all to myself!"
Neither as-ises, because the actual web of lies is more complex
than he is capable of spotting.
For example if a thetan has a headache, and he is melded with 3
grippers, 1700 cooties from hell, and a couple of Black Guard of the
Devil, but he's numbed it all out so all he has is the pain, it won't
work to just claim 'I am causing the headache' mainly because he has no
clue any more HOW he is causing the headache.
Yes his resistance and fear are ultimately causing the headache,
but he gets so introverted that he thinks all he is resisting is the
pain, and he tries to accept it and it won't vanish! It just gets worse
in fact.
The pain is the RESULT of his semi subconscious resistances, so if
he accepts the result of resistance he will merely get more of it.
He has to spot what he is really resisting, and they are POWERFUL
BUGGERS, many times more powerful than him, if he got into an arm
wrestling match with just one of these guys he would lose his arm with
the match, but once he gets what is really going on, they will vanish
and with it the pain.
By the way if the thetan at the bottom of the tone scale would
simply stop positing why he is in trouble, even by trying to take
responsibility for everything, he would start bubbling back up the tone
scale to where he could properly redistribute cause again to ultimately
retract it all back again at the top of the tone scale.
And always remember there are two kinds of acceptance.
Resignation is acceptance with expectation of persistence.
AS-ISness is acceptance with expectation of vanishment.
Confusion of the two is the source of untold trouble.
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith I would rather die poor Lightlink Internet
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF than suffer the patronage Ithaca, NY
homer@lightlink.com of bigots and pinheads. www.lightlink.com
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sun Oct 2 00:56:35 EDT 2016
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore118.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFX8JOEURT1lqxE3HERAjlfAKC2VVry6drBbCAYtWqvdNI8Wy9juwCgrNoF
6vk4fhaqCBEXjPsKNY1kgDY=
=ffJc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
TAKING BACK RESPONSIBILITY
Since an as-isness is a perfect replication of what was originally
created, if one has handed out responsibility to lots of vias and causal
terminals like other beings etc, then one must hand it all out again
just as one did before in order to retract it all.
Taking back responsibility means re delegating responsibility back
out correctly to everyone involved.
You are taking back responsibility for DELEGATING RESPONSIBILITY,
assigning cause to other beings. Thus you can take back your
delegation.
The being who is saying "I did it all" is refusing responsibility
for delegation of responsibility and cause.
The thetan dying at the bottom of the tone scale is going first
"You did this all to me!" and then "I am doing this all to myself!"
Neither as-ises, because the actual web of lies is more complex
than he is capable of spotting.
For example if a thetan has a headache, and he is melded with 3
grippers, 1700 cooties from hell, and a couple of Black Guard of the
Devil, but he's numbed it all out so all he has is the pain, it won't
work to just claim 'I am causing the headache' mainly because he has no
clue any more HOW he is causing the headache.
Yes his resistance and fear are ultimately causing the headache,
but he gets so introverted that he thinks all he is resisting is the
pain, and he tries to accept it and it won't vanish! It just gets worse
in fact.
The pain is the RESULT of his semi subconscious resistances, so if
he accepts the result of resistance he will merely get more of it.
He has to spot what he is really resisting, and they are POWERFUL
BUGGERS, many times more powerful than him, if he got into an arm
wrestling match with just one of these guys he would lose his arm with
the match, but once he gets what is really going on, they will vanish
and with it the pain.
By the way if the thetan at the bottom of the tone scale would
simply stop positing why he is in trouble, even by trying to take
responsibility for everything, he would start bubbling back up the tone
scale to where he could properly redistribute cause again to ultimately
retract it all back again at the top of the tone scale.
And always remember there are two kinds of acceptance.
Resignation is acceptance with expectation of persistence.
AS-ISness is acceptance with expectation of vanishment.
Confusion of the two is the source of untold trouble.
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith I would rather die poor Lightlink Internet
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF than suffer the patronage Ithaca, NY
homer@lightlink.com of bigots and pinheads. www.lightlink.com
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sun Oct 2 00:56:35 EDT 2016
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore118.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFX8JOEURT1lqxE3HERAjlfAKC2VVry6drBbCAYtWqvdNI8Wy9juwCgrNoF
6vk4fhaqCBEXjPsKNY1kgDY=
=ffJc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)