ACT91 (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1







((Editor's comments in double parenthesis - Homer))

THE WINDS OF WAR

ACT - 91
11 September 1995

Copyright (C) 1995 Homer Wilson Smith
Redistribution rights granted for non commercial purposes.

There are two kinds of people in the world. Those that divide
people into two kinds and those that don't.

With that in mind, I present to you the following SEVERE over
simplification.

There are two kinds of people in the world, the good guys and the
bad guys.

The good guys speak with the Voice of Truth, and the bad guys speak
with the Voice of Lies.

I believe that anonymity is the foundation of freedom in the known
universe. Anonymity is the ability to speak either the voice of truth
or the voice of lies without anyone knowing who you are.

Accountability is the opposite of Anonymity. Accountability means
that everyone knows who said what and can take them to task for it.

Both sides can use force to silence the other side, but usually its
the bad guys who use force to silence the good guys, good guys usually
use more voice of Truth to expose the bad guys.

When they aren't dodging the slings and arrows of the bad guys that
is.

Truth does not necessarily make you powerful, at least in the early
stages. In fact lies, and those that bow and pray to lies, make you
powerful. So when it comes to a match of force, the bad guys often win.

No one would argue that accountability is a bad thing, but I
would point out that ALL the members of the emerging police state are
adamantly FOR accountability at all times for all their citizens.
That should give one pause to wonder.

Anonymity is actually very hard to maintain, and absolute anonymity
for all people at all times is very difficult indeed.

Therefore by observation a society or organization is usually
operating at some gradient scale of anonymity between the extremes of
total anonymity and total non anonymity.

It can come to pass that certain gradient levels of anonymity end
up benefitting the bad guys more than the good guys. In these
situations, the bad guys tend to start winning and the good guys
perceive that the bad guys are winning BECAUSE of anonymity.

Rather than use the weapon of anonymity themselves to protect
against the bad guys, the usual convulsive reaction on the part of the
good guys is to try and close down the channels of anonymity to keep the
bad guys located and corralled. It never occurs to them to open up the
channels more and use it themselves.

The logic for closing down the channels of anonymity is very
simple. Our country is ruled by an Omni Intelligent and Omni Beneficent
God King, therefore if we track down every communication to the person
who said it, our God King will be able to silence the bad guys for us.

The problem is that our country is not run by a God King, but by
human beings who tend to elect each other into power based on the most
outrageous criteria.

As the bad guys see themselves getting corralled with
accountability, they simply run for office and get themselves elected
into the positions of power where THEY are the ones duly elected to take
action against the bad guys. Of course they take action against the
good guys instead.

It is for this reason that the temptation to tighten
accountability when anonymity is abused can be an error that leads to
a terrible trap worse than any tar pit. Namely only the bad guys get
to speak, and the good guys get to remain silent fearing for their
lives.

This is why when the police ask if you have something to hide after
you have refused to let them spot search your belongings, you must
always say, "Of course, I have EVERYTHING to hide. FROM YOU!"

There are certain basic freedoms that MUST remain in place no
matter how egregious the crimes committed therefrom, even if those
crimes are against your mother or children, because without those
freedoms in place allowing such crimes, THE STATE TAKES OVER AND PUTS
EVERYONE INTO A SUPER CONTROLLED SLAVERY.

Which is worse, child pornography or a police state?

There are lots of ways to try and stop child pornography, but
there are few ways to stop both child pornography AND the emerging
police state which feeds on people's fear of child pornography among
other things.

Police states are born from certain kinds of people selling FEAR to
the general populace, and the populace buys it. Such Merchants of Fear
are ALWAYS at the bottom of any police state. They are the foundation
and rock upon which it is built.

Anyhow as an ISP it is my job to provide the channels of
communication between people. That's what I do, I provide the
CHANNEL. This includes standard accountable type channels and not so
standard anonymous type channels.

People who communicate with each other tend to get into fights
over what they are communicating about. Usually they take their
fights out on each other. But when anonymous channels are used, they
don't know who 'each other' is, so they take it out on the provider of
the channel instead. That's me.

It's enough to make you want to throw anonymity in the waste
basket.

Many have suggested that this would be a good idea. However
those who define anonymity as 'premeditated irreponsibility' are
taking the stand that the resistance movement should always fly a big
red flag above their headquarters to let the enemy know from whence
they foray.

One might well ask whose side these people are on.

They usually consider that a government is a safe thing to have
around and wish to give it all the power it needs to protect them from
being a victim to 'crime'.

Anyhow the quest for freedom and its maintenance is an ongoing WAR.

It will never be any other way.

Providing a communication channel is a difficult job, it usually
involves a precarious balance between allowing the good guys to speak
and making sure the bad guys don't get away with the gold.

It is very hard to maintain that balance with both sides pulling
and tugging on you as the provider of the communication channel,
because they can't pull and tug on each other.

Each side wants anonymity for themselves but not for the other
side. Each side takes action against the other side by limiting
anonymity in general, and eventually each side falls into the same tar
pit together where no one can speak, no anonymity.

Ain't Justice Sweet.

Anyhow one of the main purposes of the Subscriber Agreement is to
make sure that people pull and tug on each other, and leave me out of
it even if they got no one to target at the other end of the
communication line.

Homer

- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith This file may be found at
homer@lightlink.com ftp.lightlink.com/pub/homer/act/ACT91.MEMO

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Mon Mar 6 12:06:02 EST 2017
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/act91.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFYvZb7URT1lqxE3HERArQSAKDFDPOYnTvbkLZ63wRxT7MjZnvcagCeKxf6
ypXkx981fFRn/or/Mlpmvlc=
=1QdK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l

ADORE50 (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


HELL, DEATH AND INFINITY

The subject of death has come up a few times in relation to UCP,
the so called Universal Clearing Process, NOTS, and auditing in general.

People generally consider death a bad thing, like being born in
protoplasmic slime is a good thing.

"Whee, I wanna be a Food Tube, and turn icecream into shit all day
long!"

Apparently the rest of the universe is God's way of recycling shit
back into ice cream.

Anyhow, they got it backwards, being born is a good bye of
magnitude, and dying is a hello of magnitude.

Being born is like going to prison, that ain't a happy day even if
you have lots of friends in the clink with you.

Dying is like being released from prison, sad to leave all your
friends in the clink behind, but hardly a day to rue.

Be that as it may, dying is considered bad, we all want to go
'clear and OT' while staying alive, and Christianity and Adore assures
us this is possible.

"Christ did not die on a Cross of Wood.

Christ died on the Cross of Pride and Shame.

Christ died in the flesh and was reborn in the flesh and the
Spirit, so that you do not have to die in the flesh to be reborn in the
Spirit."

Of course Adore is all hallucination, so we take that with a grain
of salt.

Man do UCPer's hate Adore. I wonder why? I can't imagine how they
could feel attacked by it at all. That one is a complete surprise to
me.

Anyhow, Adore says something else about auditing and death.

"THE ONLY THING THAT CAN KILL YOU IS DEATH."

What this means is, if you are dying of your case, the case you are
dying of is about death, or its detested immortal lack of.

You think death is scary, consider living forever in one time line.

That's hell forever, and death forever is a warm comfort compared
to hell forever.

Anyhow only the charge surrounding death and birth is strong enough
to kill a body, and this in part because it is a transition from an
immortal hell forever to a mortal death forever.

The APPARENT charge on death is the loss of all your friends still
in the clink with you, the real charge is the transition from out of the
frying pan back into the fire.

You understand this?

And if there is no fire, how then could their be that much charge
on death, for surely the frying pan of life in a mortal body is hot.
Surely it must be a relief to get back to a serene immortality or
eternality above that.

So which is worse, a God that thinks it will die forever when in
fact it will live forever, or a Human that thinks it will live forever
when in fact it will die forever?

Why would one pretend to be the other?

Fun lark on a sunny day in Heaven?

Now auditing BT's or other disincarnate beings, brings us very
close to the 7th dynamic where it all went wrong and we stuck our heads
into the 6th forever more.

The being on the 7th is like a great big balloon with two legs.

One leg stands firmly in the Infinities of the 8th, and the other
leg stands firmly on the floor of Time Stone, MEST, the 6th.

"Mortals bow and pray to the God of Time, Stone and Dust in the
Wind. Their Faith is not be belittled." - Adore

The balloon sits and lives on the 7th dynamic intermingled with a
trillion trillion other balloons each with their two legs, one in the
8th and one in the 6th.

You know in Startrek they have this huge room that acts as a
holodeck. When nothing is being projected, its empty, just a huge empty
black room with nothing in it. But then the computer can put a whole
ocean there, with ships and people and whatever you want.

OK that's what the 7th dynamic is like. The 7th dynamic is a huge
enpty room filled with beings making space and putting something in it.
What they are putting there is a self luminous, scalar, color form
picture, a hallucination if you will, of space and time, matter and
energy, that they can play with.

The picture of space and time itself takes up no space or time,
that's why it's called a scalar, zero dimensional.

The sum total of all these color form projections of space and time
welded together is the 6th dynamic.

Its like each being on the 7th is a huge clear balloon, and inside
him is some part of the 6th dynamic being projected. As other traveller
beings come along and move through each being to being, they experience
different parts of the 6th dynamic being projected.

God of MEST is not one being, God of MEST is a whole society of 7th
dynamic beings doing this for their own edification.

Usually these beings overlap each other, so MEST is a continuum
from end to end. But sometimes they may separate from each other, and
the MEST projected by one being will just kind of end and won't be
connected to the next section of MEST being projected by his neighbor.

Now traveller visitor beings wandering through this 6th dynamic
projection are well aware it is a projection, they are well aware they
themselves are also on the 7th dynamic with one foot in the 8th.

They are like museum goers who have donned their radio head phones,
and as they travel from exhibit to exhibit, the radio head phone tells
the story of the first exhibit until it comes in range of the next
exhibit at which point the radio head phones start to tell another
story. Well that's like moving through this 7th dynamic holodeck of 6th
dynamic projections.

As you move from 7th dynamic being to being, you get another part
of the MEST universe in view.

Now somewhere along the line the museum travellers do something
really weird. They BECOME part of the exhibit, they duck into the 6th
dynamic completely, they loose their awareness of living on the 7th
dynamic and they have no clue about their own other foot being in the
8th. They think they are one footed beings without a balloon on the
7th.

Further they come to comprehend that the 6th dynamnic is NOT a
holodeck project from the 7th, but is in fact actual. Thus they believe
that because they see space and time, there must be space and time.

That's like the visitor in the museum suddenly thinking the voice
he hears in his head through radio phones is a live announcer at each
exhibit.

This is a very big rift.

For one they have lost their direct pipeline to the Infinities on
the 8th.

On the 7th, they were aware of all beings, they could communicate
instantly with anyone, everyone was ever present, there was no
ALONENESS, they visited others at will, took on their projections, mused
a bit, maybe added to them, then moved on. The museum grew and evolved
as each traveler moved through it and made comment to the projecting
beings.

Suddenly the 7th no longer exists for them. Where before all
beings were instantly accessible INWARDLY, now only a few beings were
accessible OUTWWARDLY, and only with skilled use of the communication
mechanisms of MEST, sound, light etc.

Where before they knew that life was EVERY WHERE PRESENT, and MEST
was a hologram in the color forms of consciousness, now they felt that
cold steel and iron and space and time were every where present, and
that what life there was, was just a flickering manifestation of MEST
gotten a bit too complex.

Where before the longing and interchange of love was instantaneous
and ever abundant, now it had to be sought from one end of the earth to
the other and protected with dear life.

Where before there was no fear but fun fear, now things were
serious, death was immanent and came to all, and one played the game of
survival because the penalties of not doing so were worse.

Where before the being had an *INFINITE* number of INFINITIES on
the 8th, and a close and boundless family on the 7th and fun baubles of
color form on the 6th, now the being had only a 6th, and that dynamic is
a meat grinder running on a carrier wave of horror, and no 7th at all,
forming an impenetrable black abyss between the 6th and an incompetently
imagined 8th of a far off and commanding God living on the other side of
the Abyss.

Where before the being had FOREVER to accomplish and do whatever he
wanted to do, he now had one life and that's it bud.

Immortal dreams and feelings were too hot to bear, one could not
even think of them and live.

Finally this being takes to taking on a baby 5th dynamic, growing
up as a 1st dynamic into a 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. He eschews the 5th as
beneath him, and struts on the 4th as if he is God. For if there is no
other God for him, he might as well be that God.

After he grows up and sits on the mountain top of a mature 4th
dynamic of mankind, the pinnacle of consciousness for him is that there
IS NO consciousness except the weird flicker of life in the cold steel
and electronic marble that he calls himself.

He and his consciousness is made of parts operating via cause and
effect across a space time distance, thus he is a machine, his
consciousness merely a process in a space time gizmo called his brain,
and when the constituents, arrangement and process of those parts fall
apart, he and his consciousness will disintegrate forever with them.

So he grew up as a 1st to become a 4th and then looks from the
center of the dynamics up at the 5th and 6th, and sees the stars and
only a great mystery before him.

He pretends to embrace the mystery, but in truth cowers in fear
from it, pretending (hoping) it can never be known lest he never live it
down.

There is nothing beyond the night sky to him but his hopes and
fears.

Now you are going to audit this guy on a BT. That puts him right
back where he first ducked into the 6th FOR REAL and severed his ties
with the 7th and 8th.

As a pc he is reaching FROM the 4th to ARRIVE at the 8th, he wants
to BECOME GOD.

As an auditor you are trying to get him to BE the 8th which he
already is, he never left, and re create himself downward to becoming a
4th.

The charge on immortal dreams that he lost in his fall into the 6th
dynamic valley of the shadow of death, is enough to kill him, unless you
take him, his entire life, his body, everything that he owns, and all of
his friends and loved ones back to the 7th *TOGETHER*.

For they are all already there, he can't go back 'alone'.

And they must get there from the 8th down, not from the 4th up.

Man does not be come God, God becomes man.

The recovery of that God is to become man again until he tires of
the deceit as a God.

So basically if your pc isn't looking into the maw of hell forever
and death forever at least every few sessions, he just isn't running
deeply or even anything that will do him any long term good.

Once he contacts even for a moment how he REALLY FEELS about being
a process in a space time gizmo, he will understand why he is sick and
has a long road ahead of him, recovering his soveriengty and equanimity
over the matter.

The choice of eternal life to become eternally dead.

Sickness is basically non equanmity powering seriously off source
misdirection in life.

We don't need to kill the pc to make him better, but once you find
that direction which the pc is most certain will kill him if he goes
near it, you have your orientation on the direction the pc is most going
wrong in, and the direction the pc most needs to go right in.

Your preclear is just sure he can die of joy, so watch it.

Homer

- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth and Peace. Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sun Mar 5 12:06:02 EST 2017
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore50.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFYvEV7URT1lqxE3HERAhnrAKCahCs56AxcOLUMUfiYpA3m3ysXCgCfT+DP
LehXNe0OmU41DwKn1jY950E=
=uRBu
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Sun Mar 5 20:04:30 EST 2017
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore50.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFYvLWfURT1lqxE3HERAvf2AJ0QCKcr9C4shEQrvhC2ziYtLZldkQCZAbXG
1RTXuT1izWxxg6unL8+guf8=
=ahVX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l

ADORE330 (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

MOTHER AND SON

Clearing Archive Roboposter (roboposter@lightlink.com) wrote:
> Thus I submit that we should look into how women feel about
>the FACT that they create men, and yet they feel overwhelmed by
>their own creation. We must also look at how mothers who have
>these attitudes relate with their sons, and how this in turn
>results in sons that become what the mother fears most.

>Implied in this inquiry is the attitude that women are not
>INsignificant in the scheme of things. ^^ Typo corrected.

Bottom line is equal rights means equal duties, and visa versa.

If you want equal rights, INSIST on equal duties.

If you want the right to vote, insist on being draftable along
with everyone else who has the right to vote.

Or else vote the draft out of existence.

For those with ears to hear, and a vote to cast.

Homer

Sun Jun 4 23:02:46 EDT 2006

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sat Mar 4 12:06:02 EST 2017
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore330.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFYuvP7URT1lqxE3HERAoE3AJ419EGiefc+LTJFVF8zMhjBb/IYQACguquq
g5xOpVFu9Zs/RqDXtrR9bZY=
=sQ3I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l

VITALISM (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


6:45pm
Stephen Smith
Remember the dogs on state street?
Hi Holmer, I found the following quote: As physiology came to
be understood more and more in terms of physical mechanisms,
vitalistic explanations for the functioning of the body were
refuted one by one. The last holdout for vitalism was the
kidney, but it fell into total disrepute after the elegant
experiments of Homer Smith in the 1930s demonstrated clearly
the filtration and secretory mechanisms of that organ.
It came from this
website:??http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Vitalism
But I am thinking that these attacks on vitalism are
misplaced, and brought to us by "meat heads." Did your father
(quoted above) understand this conflict as well as yourself?
The fallacy of excluded middle must be in place here, is my
quess. My view is that the vital is supported by the physical,
rather than being defined by the physical. The vital gave
birth the volition, emotion, and spirit, all of which are
self-evident and all have transcended the kidney function that
they depend on. A trinitarian logic gets beyond the fallacy of
excluded middle, where vitalism is discovered again.

Vitalism: Facts, Discussion Forum, and Encyclopedia Article
www.absoluteastronomy.com
Today

11:13pm
Homer Wilson Smith
Read the very last chapter of "Man and His Gods", it may be on
line.
My father's idea of God had been poisoned by Christianity and
the other inanities of Earth to a point where he had little
patience for it rightly so. God is not a God of BEHAVIOR, God
is a God of CREATION.
Occam's Razor says take the simplest theory to your bean
counters, as the simplest theory that explains all the facts
is the one you should spend money on. But who has all the
facts? That vitalism, or God or Spirit, or consciousness is
not necessary to explain the extant observable facts of the
time, hardly proves they do not exist, and my father knew it,
he merely found little reason to complicate things by bringing
God or Spirit into it. Does a watch need a spirit to run it?
Does a brain? To him they were both machines, and machines are
mathematical mass and force in motion contraptions that have
no need for PAIN SHAME PLEASURE LOVE etc. Notice that a car is
a mechanical contraption also, but its DRIVER is a spirit. Now
we know that love and pain can not of force and mass be made.
So they missed that one. Recent results about the nature of
consciousness rather conclusively puts to rest the idea that
consciousness is a process in machinery, space time gizmos, of
any complexity. This is athttp://www.lightlink.com/theproof. A
machine can not be certain of itself, space or time because a
machine learns by being an effect of distant causes, no matter
how close, and the relationship between effect and cause is
one of THEORY, not PERFECT CERTAINTY. No part of any machine
can be perfectly certain of any other part! But consciousness
is self aware, worse it is self aware of how it is NOW, not
how it WAS a nano second ago, which is the best a machine can
do about learning about its own self. And its still a theory
about a nano ago! This is easy to prove, if there is time
between the cause and the effect, then the cause is GONE by
the time the effect is created, and thus the effect can never
bea direct perception of the cause as it IS NOW, but only a
symbolic messenger of how the cause might have been when the
effect was generated. Thus the effect can never see the cause
period. Time between causes blindness and only conjecture to
remain. Consciousness however can SEE itself SEEING, and thus
this must be an instantaneous process in the now, where the
being is not learning about itself by looking at a later
effect but by looking directly at the cause itself in the NOW.
Space time gizmo physics can not wrap its wits around that one
at all, as all physics understands is space time processes,
but consciousness is a spaceless timeless 'process' where
learning about cause is gleaned by directly looking at cause
and not at some alleged effect a while in time later. The time
between cause and effect in the PU demands that the learning
about the cause via the effect is dated learning out of the
gate. Anyhow one out of the body experience that is verifiable
and all of physics gets thrown out. THERE IS NO WAY THEY WILL
EVERY EXPLAIN AWAY CONSCIOUSNESS WITH THE 4 FUNDAMENTAL FORCES
OF NATURE, no matter how unified they get it. That's because
perfect certainy and love and shame can not of force and mass
be made. They may explain the physical projection and thus
reduce everyone to a space time gizmo, but never the
consciousness experiencing itself with perfect certainty. The
unified science of the all that is then is saved in this way:
The physical universe does not exist at all, its a rendition
in the dreaming mind of consciousness. Consciousness is co
eternal with all other consciousness units and lives above
space and time as the static co-dreaming the kinetic. The
static is a MULTI BEING, and each being incarnates as it
wishes in a dreamtime body called an avatar. It can be a quark
or a star or a molecule or a human body. Thus the PU is a
hallucination pure and simple, correct down to the last quark,
but none the less a co shared virtual reality. Consciousness
is not virtual, it is actual, as is the I-AM being that has
that consciousness, and consciousness is not a process in a
virtual reality! So no, my father did not have that
understanding, that would have been like expecting a dreamer
to know he was dreaming. He like Newton and the rest of the
meatballs thought that space and time are actual, just as most
dreamers don't know they are dreaming, but he mentions 'what
is this thing we call consciousness?' in that last chapter of
Man and His Gods, leaving it I suppose to another life which
he didn't know for sure he would have, and frankly probably
thought he didn't have and after 10 years with my mother,
probably didn't want. Most meatballs have a sense that
conscioussness is 'different' or special, but as far as I know
they have NEVER put their finger on just what it is that makes
consciousness special. What can consciousness do that a
machine can't? PERFECT CERTAINTY OF ITSELF AND ITS EXPERIENCES
IN THE NOW. Since I am the only one saying that in present
time and have no footnotes or references to support it, I
shall be considered a crack pot until such time a that
changes. :)

The Proof
www.lightlink.com
Learning Certainty and Causality in Consciousness

11:14pm
Homer Wilson Smith
And with all that said, the angels and the aliens have been
tinkering with the genetic strains and the kidney for a long
time to make it evolve properly

- ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01CE7AA0.B105DAB0--
Mon Jul 8 13:06:46 EDT 2013

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Thu Mar 2 12:06:02 EST 2017
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/vitalism
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFYuFD6URT1lqxE3HERAqqhAKC1LdB0vb+649HCeUwU0DSf+VDx9wCghO8w
d5k7XZG7fP4vTYU1bIVy68o=
=q34d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

SCI26 Typos fixed

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



HOW DOES CLEAR TECH GROW?

SCI - 26

Copyright (C) 1992 Homer Wilson Smith
Redistribution rights granted for non commercial purposes.


Part of the problem within the Church is that the technical route
to clear and OT is already laid out. There are a certain number of
fixed processes used at each level and although there are quite a few,
and the C/S has some leeway in choosing which ones to run, none are
being added to the repertoire.

One of the results of running a process on someone, or doing it
solo, are the cognitions that the pc has at the win end of the activity.
Cognitions are new realizations about life, new in the sense that he was
not aware of them just before, but they are also not new in the sense
that the pc set up his own not know long ago, so he is really just
finding out about his own Sovereignty in the matter.

Invariably part of the cognitions that come forth from running a
process are cognitions pertaining to the process of running processes
themselves, INCLUDING OTHER PROCESSES TO RUN.

Sometimes if the process run was not the optimum process to run for
the set of cognitions that came forward, the pc will cognite what
processs SHOULD have been run to get to the same place faster or more
deeply.

More often if the process run was correct the pc will cognite what
possible NEXT set of processes could be run to produce more case gain.

Now the Church lays the Bridge out in a very linear fashion, you
start at the bottom and you work upwards. To take a little dig at them
here, they assume that anyone walking in off the street has never had
any case gain before in all their zillions of years of track and
religious practices and things, so everyone needs to do the bottom part
of the Bridge first before they can do anything else, especially the
top.

Further they don't tell you about the top of the Bridge or what it
handles, entities, so if someone comes in with entity awareness they put
him at the bottom anyhow and tell him he is hallucinating and it will
all be taken care of when his drugs are run out on the drug rundown.

But this is an arbitrary failing of some very stupid people, it has
nothing to do with the Bridge or with Scientology tech as Ron laid it
out. He quite clearly said that if the pc comes in raving mad on some
subject, you audit him on that subject no matter what it is, even if it
is entities, and then once he has become more untangled you can proceed
with an orderly clean up of their case.

Everyone will want to run Life Repair eventually, its just not
necessarily the right thing to do to someone the very first thing.

But all this aside, the Bridge as laid out is still very linear and
also very fixed. If a pc were to cognite another process during
session, he would never be allowed to use it on himself or anyone else.
Thus a whole large chunk of his cognitions are just ignored or swept
away, and often aren't even vocalized because it would be rude to
suggest other tech, better tech or further tech.

None the less any tech when run to completion that does NOT cause
cogitions of other tech or further tech is just not tech worth running.
How do you think Ron himself got the Bridge? Each process led to
cognitions about the next process.

So in the field it is kind of a free for all when it comes to tech,
because everyone is using tech that is causing them to cognite on better
tech or further tech and the end result is a burgeoning area of
technical development.

So here is an example. Ron has said many times that games consist
of goals, freedoms and barriers. For example, let's say you have the
goal to eat a hamburger. Your barriers are the work you have to do to
get the thing cooked, the space and time you have to work through to
accomplish your ends, and everything else that is in the way of
Sovereign Desire immediately making a fully eaten hamburger in your
stomach. Sheesh, you even got to eat the thing.

Your freedoms of course are all those things you can do to get
around the barriers to eventually succeed in getting one cooked and
fully eaten hamburger in your stomach.

Pretty silly, isn't it?

Well the same thing applies to any goal, whether it is to eat a
hamburger or to build a new civilization. You got things you can do,
and things in your way, and a desired end result.

If things are too hard to accomplish, then desire is not Sovereign
enough, if things are too easy to accomplish then desire is much too
Sovereign.

Happiness comes from OPTIMUM non Sovereignty.

In order to rearrange a pc's alotment of Sovereignty you got to get
him to spot how he has it arranged in present time. Most people don't
even know what they are doing any more when it comes to setting games up
for themselves, they have confusions on the matter, they just want out
of there, they have semi conscious games going, they have withholds on
games, games they don't want others to know about, it's a mess.

So you would need to process your pc on games in order to get him
back into shape where he could clean up his own thetan domicile and get
his game factory in good working order again.

Long time ago Ron came up with a one shot Clear process, but it was
too brutal to run.

It was,

'Invent a game.'

Now, this repair of the game factory is a serious undertaking, and
in fact the entire Bridge is devoted to doing just this one thing,
especially all the material on GPMS, (most of it secret), because GPMS
ARE the underlying template for the games that the pc is playing and
losing in this life.

Some of these games by the way the pc hasn't the slightest inkling
of anymore because 'he has only lived once' etc. You will find in
running games that your pc is a divine being, with divine propensities
of grand caliber, and that all the mundane stuff he is caught in is
really just marking time while he figures out how to be a god again.

He won't tell you this if you ask him, he won't even know it, he
will tell you very seriously about all of his one life mortal plans,
problems and travails, but if you audit him on games to a deep win, he
will turn around and tell you the most hair raising schemes that have
really been going on inside him since the beginning of time.

So how do you run games?

Well the following processes are not in the Church, and I'll bet
they are not even in the field, because I just cognited on them this
morning. So this is primo chipmunk material.

They are probably a waste of time, me being a loon and all, and
besides they are just too simple to be important, so certainly don't
bother running them on yourself or on another.

That said, here they are:

'Spot a goal.'
'Spot a barrier.'
'Spot a freedom.'

Dumb, eh? You ought to see the OT VIII materials.

Anyhow, auditing is a process usually between two people. You can
ruin any auditing session by not following the Auditor's Code and by not
using the auditing comm cycle.

Aud: 'Spot a goal'
PC: 'Ok, well I would like to make friends with that girl over
there.'
Aud: 'Good.'

Aud: 'Spot a barrier.'
PC: 'Well I look like a toad and I am sure she already has a boy
friend, all good looking girls do.'
Aud: 'Ok.'

Aud: 'Spot a freedom'
PC: 'Well I can play the piano and I know she's good at the
violin, and her boy friend is a dumb jock anyhow, maybe I
could talk her into performing Tchaikovski's violin piano
concerto with me.'
Aud: 'Thank you.'

Aud: 'Spot a goal'
etc.

And we're off and away.

Now you don't run this kind of thing for 5 minutes an give up
because it's boring. This kind of thing can run for days in the
background or for hours during a real session. Chances are you would
get some serious charge coming off the case after about 20 minutes in
formal session, and a significant win in about 45 minutes.

So now how could this be used?

Well let's say you wanted to rehabilitate a member of the Church.
That is, get him back into the Church.

Usually people who have left the Church on something less than good
terms have done so because they have commited overts that the Church
failed to find out about.

If the Church had pulled their withholds, as it was supposed to do,
the person would be very pleased with his auditing and would therefore
still be part of the group.

So therefore it is not very surprising that the Church has so many
people leaving it in disgust, because they have as their highest goal
missing people's withholds at all cost.

That's a joke, for those of you who are humor impaired.

I mean if the pc actually had to cough up during session, then all
the C/S's and tech terminals in the Church would also have to reveal
what they had done, not to mention upper management.

So it has become one large cess pool of mutual withholds, and
because no one in positions of power wishes to have their withholds
pulled, especially their whole track stuff, they of course refuse to
pull anyone else's.

So this is how it goes,

Aud: 'Well now Mr. Pc, has a withhold been missed?'
PC: 'Well maybe, I am not sure, let me look...'
Aud: 'What's that little jiggle on the needle there?'
PC: 'Uh, oh, well, that's nothing I don't think, well maybe...'
Aud: 'No Ok, that's good enough for me.'

The auditor was hoping the pc wouldn't reveal anything that might
affect the auditor's case, and when the pc almost did, but seemed
reticent, the auditor helped the pc in favor of keeping quiet.

So the auditor continues on with session with a massively missed
whole track GPM withhold on the pc, and the next day the pc is gone and
never comes back.

He KNOWS the Auditor is a jerk, and so is the whole Church.

So when you are trying to handle this in blown pcs or staff members
of the Church, and there are thousands of them, you gotta find out
what's going on with the person and why he blew.

Well be blew for exactly three reasons:

'Spot a goal.'
'Spot a barrier.'
'Spot a freedom.'

The barrier to freedom ratio became too large and so he left.

No one in the church wants to know what the pc did because they
don't want to know what they did and so withholds are missed routinely,
by COVERT POLICY, so neither pc nor auditor gets better and the whole
thing goes to hell.

Remember the amnesia the preclear has of his past is
TRAUMATIC amnesia.

Let that sit for a bit until its ramifications hit home.

He thinks he is mortal because his immortality was unbearable.

If withholds were not missed, no one would ever leave the church,
they would love it, and things would be fine.

That's what Churchs are for, confessions, you know.

If people are leaving the Church it is only because withholds are
being missed.

Now don't get me wrong here, it's not that the pc has done
something wrong, and someone failed to find out what he was holding on
to so tight no one could get it out of him with a crow bar.

No, that's not what happens.

Admittedly pcs have withheld from the world at large so hard and
for so long they no longer know how to unwithhold, and they no longer
know what it is they are withholding.

But pcs are coming into the Church in order to give a confession,
they WANT to give a confession, they want HELP giving a confession, they
are prepared to give it ALL to the first God King that asks them to pick
up the cans, and they have put down thousands of dollars to keep those
God Kings in hamburgers.

When they don't get what they came in for, they get real pissed off
and leave.

'What good is being a God King if you can't even pull one damn
withhold! To hell with you.'

There's the withhold you see, eternal separation.

So the pc leaves.

And when a preclear leaves his church, he is not messing around.

So many years later you find him nattering about the Church,
licking his wounds, sour on clear tech, committing more overt acts, and
generally winding down in life.

So you ask him,

'What did you first come into Scientology to handle?'
'Did it get handled?'
'If not, why?'

You run this over and over again in sequence much as you would run
the goals, barriers, freedoms thing until he realizes that his withhold
was missed, probably on purpose, if convulsively.

Now you want him to start running goals, barriers and freedoms,
until he starts to cognite that much of the overload on barriers in his
life arise from his withholds of action because of regret and wrong
doing, and breaking agreements and making mistakes and generally being a
screw ball of magnitude.

Look, an OT in fine condition doesn't fool around with games, if
they are even slightly too easy to play, the OT wins.

BOOOORRRRRRIIIINNNNNGGGG.

So the OT will go to GREAT lengths to limit himself right to the
razor's edge of disability to give him the hardest game he can muster
without guaranteeing a loss. This happens over a long period of time of
playing many games and winning far to many of them.

Games involve taking responsibility for other's well being and
having other's do the same for one's own.

When responsibility comes a cropper the result is unbearable
regret and self loathing.

Since self love powers the game and all creativity, you can see
where that might lead.

So an OT who is a wizened old coot will always be on the borderline
of too little ability. When he wins it will always be by the skin of
his teeth, the closest close calls imaginable, and those are the wins he
enjoys the most.

You know, Cornell is behind Princeton 3 touchdowns, and everyone
gets up to leave in the last 10 minutes, and Cornell gets 4 touchdowns
in the last 3 minutes and no one was there to see it.

THOSE are the kind of games OT's like, maybe everyone else left,
but the players were still there, and the OT was still there losing
until the last minute when he had a come back that would never be
forgotten.

The point is the OT has zero margin of error in this kind of life,
he messes up once and he is done for.

So why are withhold's so important? Because a withhold is a
withholding of ability, a LESSENING of ability in a being who can not
afford to be one bit more unable than he already is, or he will lose
forever. He has arranged it this way, and the moment he gets a withhold
his margin of error is gone, and he starts losing for good.

And losing a game doesn't mean he loses the trophy, losing a game
means OTHER PEOPLE GET HURT.

If he is not able to solo his way out of this mess, then he will
get stuck in a dwindling spiral of self loathing and self denial, and
that will be the end of him, he will lose every game he plays from there
on out.

Worse he will desperately try to WIN games by committing MORE overt
acts which get him into MORE regret and withholds, which lead him
eventually to playing the game of trying to kill himself.

And that's a game he can't win no matter how hard he tries.

He becomes Joe Mortal, S(c)eptic At Large.

Now look this is very serious.

You got a God King, not only thinking he is going to die, but
WANTING to die.

Remind me again, exactly how you get an infinite source of
self love to hate itself to death?

You come along and offer to help him out of this mess, and he will
take your head off.

You are nothing but a joke to him.

A really bad joke.

Suggesting to a being in this state that he can get better will be
taken by him as kicking a man when he's down.

But let's say you have done your Hubbard Hard Sell Course and you
tell him, 'Look I know you have had it rough, but we can help you', and
you explain to him all the stuff I have been saying here, and finally he
looks up at you and says, 'Ok well maybe I will come in for auditing.'

You tell him 'Well great, there is just one thing, it will cost you
$3000 an intensive for this help, you got any money?'

He looks real sad, shakes his head, but then he reaches into his
coat pocket and pulls out his last bottle of wine and holds it out to
you.

If you're smart you'll say 'Good enough' and you'll take his gift
and you make an appointment.

Now look, what you are trying to find on this case is the withhold
that pushed him over the line from self loving to self loathing for
real.

But the line he was playing was some enormous Goal, Barrier,
Freedom thing, where the odds were against him and the dependencies
with others were absolute.

He goes down, they go down.

If you miss that withhold, or if you refuse to confront it
yourself, or if you invalidate it, or if you don't even ask for it, you
will just crush him back down into his failure because this God King has
50 percent of his power already opposing himself and that was when he
was doing good.

That was when he could win with a prayer to the God of Close Calls.

Now he is a mess, and he is willing to give you his last bottle of
wine only because you came across with some of that Golden Light that he
used to have before he came to live in vomit.

If you let him down, if you fail to get the withhold, if you flinch
at the last moment and make him forget what he is talking about mid
cognition, if you make him fold up or wonder if you are really a safe
terminal to unburden to, you will merely be kicking a God King when he
is down, and he will get you for it someday.

So don't do it, if you value your friends.

Charge them all you want for your service, but do not fail to
deliver that service.

Now if you happen to pick up this fellow after he has already been
through this help become harm cycle once, say with the Church, you just
acknowledge that it didn't work, and then proceed to do it right.

You first run

'What did you come into Scientology to get handled?'
'Did it get handled?'
'If not, why not?'

repetitively until he cognites that he has a constellation of
problems, overts, withholds, upsets and computations.

Then you run

'Spot a goal'
'Spot a barrier'
'Spot a freedom'

until he cognites what the goal was that he has that mess on,
making sure that you take any confessions that he has to give along the
way. Once he gets the goal, the actual withholds will start coming off
with great relief.

Now you might say, well why would you want to rehabilitate this
guy's desire to be in the Church, I mean look what they did to him.
Wouldn't he better off in the field?

The answer is, that depends.

The OT is interested in his own goals, not yours. If his goal is
'To build a better Church', then that is where he belongs.

If his goal is something else, then maybe he would be better off in
the field.

You NEVER audit someone to make them more acceptable to you.

If you don't like the direction his goal is going in, if you find
that you are auditing the competition, then charge him more for your
services, but for heavens sake do it right, audit him on HIS goal, not
yours.

He WILL return the favor to you someday.

The Church assumes that everyone would be better off in the Church.

This is just simply not true.

For some, being in the Church was a substitute for being in the
field and being able to do research and help the science grow. There
WAS no field, no one told them there was a field, so they stayed in the
Church.

Someone like this might have the goal 'To start a new religion.'

For others being in the field is a substitute for being in the
Church and they are sad they can't get in, money, ethics conditions,
prior associations (EST etc) whatever.

The Church is not a bad thing, it is a good thing, it is a game
that certain OT's are playing real hard. They are just doing a lousy
job of it, their attacks against the field being but a part of their
grand dance of continuous present time overts.

You might ask, well why is it so bad in the Church?

I would answer very simply:

Because the word SOVEREIGNTY is not part of their vocabulary.

Try it sometime, ask any Scientologist in good standing what
Sovereingty is and what it has to do with his present case condition.

Chances are he will tell you Sovereignty is something that Kings
had in far off lands long ago.

Ask him if he is a God King himself, and watch his eyes fall.

Perhaps if more people in the Church were to read these postings on
Sovereignty there would be far fewer blows from the Church, except maybe
in upper management where a few of the very worst would blow when they
realized their little game of enslaving God Kings was up.

In general though, any time someone feels like blowing from an area
of help, there is something wrong with the help. If there are competing
areas of help it is not a blow for one area of help to help you over to
the other area of help, if that is where you belong.

I am not opposed to the Church, no doubt a testament to my own
auditing on the matter. The Church is one of many games that some very
big beings are playing on this planet. The field is too.

The beings who are responsible for the field and the Church do not
necessarily wish each other out of existence forever for free, they
understand that competition creates quality in product and service.

The Church is up to its ears in competition right now, you notice
that Fleming said he was an OT 16, the Church hasn't even released OT 10
yet.

So the players in this game do not hate each other, in fact they
invite the cooperation and competition that they all know they need to
survive.

Perhaps those with a lower view wish the other side out of
existence, and perhaps some of these blokes are upper management in the
Church.

You know, their 'Kill a chipmunk for Christ' campaign.

So, no I am not against the Church. I am an auditor, and as such I
do not take sides in the matter of which game is a good game or which is
a bad game.

I only audit towards OPTIMUM game, which means a game that can
continue and grow and not end with either side winning with the defeat
of the other.

Especially when the only game that either side can find to play
seems to be internecine squabbling with each other.

A lot of nut cases are playing the game to end the game.

Imagine a football team trying to KILL OFF the other side?

That's what some in the Church is doing to the FreeZone and anyone
else with a free mind trying to help.

Those who are used to the good/evil dichotomy seem to think that it
would be a good thing if evil were wiped out tomorrow, it would give the
good some rest. Indeed it would, but soon the good would be chosing up
sides again, 'Hey guys, anyone wanna play war? You be good, I will be
evil' and they would start the whole thing all over again.

A thetan's motto is, 'The game must go on.'

The purpose of creating a game is not to win or to lose, but to
PLAY. When the game ends, everyone loses.

If you want a hint of the sorrow of games ending, just picture a
hundred billion years down the road every one has gone clear and OT, and
there are no more games left to play in this universe and its time for
everone to pack up and go home, to part and go back to the big sleep in
the sky, and we are all waving good bye to each other as this big 'THE
END' sign comes up over the universe probably to the last strains of
Grieg's A minor concerto.

This dream ends forever when the circle of friends are all holding
hands again.

A million trillion little thetans all waving 'bye!' to each other.

So, you see a thetan will do ANYTHING to keep the game going.

So as an auditor I do not want to see the Church go down, or close
its doors.

I do want to see it stop producing as its valuable final product
ruined games and destroyed lives.

Just as I would audit a pc, I would audit the entire Church,

'What game did you originally set out to play?'
'Have you been playing it?'
'If not why not?'

until they realized they had a constellative mess with problems,
overts, withholds. upsets and computations.

Then I would find that mess with,

'Spot a game'
'Spot a barrier'
'Spot a freedom'

until I got the goal, the game and the withhold (refusal to play)
that crashed it all down.

NO ONE IS AUDITING THE CHURCH.

It is stuck in one great big huge self audit.

The Church is a pc who has been allowed to blow session and nurture
and fester its own withholds.

When your auditor screws you over its time for you to pick up the
meter and tell your auditor to pick up the cans.

Even if he is bigger than you.

Then when he can audit again, you can be the pc again.

If he succeeds and does right by you, be sure to pay him a
hamburger.

Homer

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Wed Mar 1 12:06:02 EST 2017
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/sci26.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFYtv97URT1lqxE3HERAt78AJ94On5TIdKSvUeTb0OFwmdHoPMafgCeOL7q
F2gaKRyKC2qUpdpjt5ZN4A8=
=3xUb
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Wed Mar 1 17:11:00 EST 2017
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/sci26.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFYt0b0URT1lqxE3HERAvusAKCNLiyE2DyvlPu1hz0WxsHKFlq2XQCfcKEF
sYydvpgYRqmu5GiqA+CAGo8=
=NBR8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l

SCI26 (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1







HOW DOES CLEAR TECH GROW?

SCI - 26

Copyright (C) 1992 Homer Wilson Smith
Redistribution rights granted for non commercial purposes.


Part of the problem within the Church is that the technical route
to clear and OT is already laid out. There are a certain number of
fixed processes used at each level and although there are quite a few,
and the C/S has some leeway in choosing which ones to run, none are
being added to the repertoire.

One of the results of running a process on someone, or doing it
solo, are the cognitions that the pc has at the win end of the activity.
Cognitions are new realizations about life, new in the sense that he was
not aware of them just before, but they are also not new in the sense
that the pc set up his own not know long ago, so he is really just
finding out about his own Sovereignty in the matter.

Invariably part of the cognitions that come forth from running a
process are cognitions pertaining to the process of running processes
themselves, INCLUDING OTHER PROCESSES TO RUN.

Sometimes if the process run was not the optimum process to run for
the set of cognitions that came forward, the pc will cognite what
processs SHOULD have been run to get to the same place faster or more
deeply.

More often if the process run was correct the pc will cognite what
possible NEXT set of processes could be run to produce more case gain.

Now the Church lays the Bridge out in a very linear fashion, you
start at the bottom and you work upwards. To take a little dig at them
here, they assume that anyone walking in off the street has never had
any case gain before in all their zillions of years of track and
religious practices and things, so everyone needs to do the bottom part
of the Bridge first before they can do anything else, especially the
top.

Further they don't tell you about the top of the Bridge or what it
handles, entities, so if someone comes in with entity awareness they put
him at the bottom anyhow and tell him he is hallucinating and it will
all be taken care of when his drugs are run out on the drug rundown.

But this is an arbitrary failing of some very stupid people, it has
nothing to do with the Bridge or with Scientology tech as Ron laid it
out. He quite clearly said that if the pc comes in raving mad on some
subject, you audit him on that subject no matter what it is, even if it
is entities, and then once he has become more untangled you can proceed
with an orderly clean up of their case.

Everyone will want to run Life Repair eventually, its just not
necessarily the right thing to do to someone the very first thing.

But all this aside, the Bridge as laid out is still very linear and
also very fixed. If a pc were to cognite another process during
session, he would never be allowed to use it on himself or anyone else.
Thus a whole large chunk of his cognitions are just ignored or swept
away, and often aren't even vocalized because it would be rude to
suggest other tech, better tech or further tech.

None the less any tech when run to completion that does NOT cause
cogitions of other tech or further tech is just not tech worth running.
How do you think Ron himself got the Bridge? Each process led to
cognitions about the next process.

So in the field it is kind of a free for all when it comes to tech,
because everyone is using tech that is causing them to cognite on better
tech or further tech and the end result is a burgeoning area of
technical development.

So here is an example. Ron has said many times that games consist
of goals, freedoms and barriers. For example, let's say you have the
goal to eat a hamburger. Your barriers are the work you have to do to
get the thing cooked, the space and time you have to work through to
accomplish your ends, and everything else that is in the way of
Sovereign Desire immediately making a fully eaten hamburger in your
stomach. Sheesh, you even got to eat the thing.

Your freedoms of course are all those things you can do to get
around the barriers to eventually succeed in getting one cooked and
fully eaten hamburger in your stomach.

Pretty silly, isn't it?

Well the same thing applies to any goal, whether it is to eat a
hamburger or to build a new civilization. You got things you can do,
and things in your way, and a desired end result.

If things are too hard to accomplish, then desire is not Sovereign
enough, if things are too easy to accomplish then desire is much too
Sovereign.

Happiness comes from OPTIMUM non Sovereignty.

In order to rearrange a pc's alotment of Sovereignty you got to get
him to spot how he has it arranged in present time. Most people don't
even know what they are doing any more when it comes to setting games up
for themselves, they have confusions on the matter, they just want out
of there, they have semi conscious games going, they have withholds on
games, games they don't want others to know about, it's a mess.

So you would need to process your pc on games in order to get him
back into shape where he could clean up his own thetan domicile and get
his game factory in good working order again.

Long time ago Ron came up with a one shot Clear process, but it was
too brutal to run.

It was,

'Invent a game.'

Now, this repair of the game factory is a serious undertaking, and
in fact the entire Bridge is devoted to doing just this one thing,
especially all the material on GPMS, (most of it secret), because GPMS
ARE the underlying template for the games that the pc is playing and
losing in this life.

Some of these games by the way the pc hasn't the slightest inkling
of anymore because 'he has only lived once' etc. You will find in
running games that your pc is a divine being, with divine propensities
of grand caliber, and that all the mundane stuff he is caught in is
really just marking time while he figures out how to be a god again.

He won't tell you this if you ask him, he won't even know it, he
will tell you very seriously about all of his one life mortal plans,
problems and travails, but if you audit him on games to a deep win, he
will turn around and tell you the most hair raising schemes that have
really been going on inside him since the beginning of time.

So how do you run games?

Well the following processes are not in the Church, and I'll bet
they are not even in the field, because I just cognited on them this
morning. So this is primo chipmunk material.

They are probably a waste of time, me being a loon and all, and
besides they are just too simple to be important, so certainly don't
bother running them on yourself or on another.

That said, here they are:

'Spot a goal.'
'Spot a barrier.'
'Spot a freedom.'

Dumb, eh? You ought to see the OT VIII materials.

Anyhow, auditing is a process usually between two people. You can
ruin any auditing session by not following the Auditor's Code and by not
using the auditing comm cycle.

Aud: 'Spot a goal'
PC: 'Ok, well I would like to make friends with that girl over
there.'
Aud: 'Good.'

Aud: 'Spot a barrier.'
PC: 'Well I look like a toad and I am sure she already has a boy
friend, all good looking girls do.'
Aud: 'Ok.'

Aud: 'Spot a freedom'
PC: 'Well I can play the piano and I know she's good at the
violin, and her boy friend is a dumb jock anyhow, maybe I
could talk her into performing Tchaikovski's violin piano
concerto with me.'
Aud: 'Thank you.'

Aud: 'Spot a goal'
etc.

And we're off and away.

Now you don't run this kind of thing for 5 minutes an give up
because it's boring. This kind of thing can run for days in the
background or for hours during a real session. Chances are you would
get some serious charge coming off the case after about 20 minutes in
formal session, and a significant win in about 45 minutes.

So now how could this be used?

Well let's say you wanted to rehabilitate a member of the Church.
That is, get him back into the Church.

Usually people who have left the Church on something less than good
terms have done so because they have commited overts that the Church
failed to find out about.

If the Church had pulled their withholds, as it was supposed to do,
the person would be very pleased with his auditing and would therefore
still be part of the group.

So therefore it is not very surprising that the Church has so many
people leaving it in disgust, because they have as their highest goal
missing people's withholds at all cost.

That's a joke, for those of you who are humor impaired.

I mean if the pc actually had to cough up during session, then all
the C/S's and tech terminals in the Church would also have to reveal
what they had done, not to mention upper management.

So it has become one large cess pool of mutual withholds, and
because no one in positions of power wishes to have their withholds
pulled, especially their whole track stuff, they of course refuse to
pull anyone else's.

So this is how it goes,

Aud: 'Well now Mr. Pc, has a withhold been missed?'
PC: 'Well maybe, I am not sure, let me look...'
Aud: 'What's that little jiggle on the needle there?'
PC: 'Uh, oh, well, that's nothing I don't think, well maybe...'
Aud: 'No Ok, that's good enough for me.'

The auditor was hoping the pc wouldn't reveal anything that might
affect the auditor's case, and when the pc almost did, but seemed
reticent, the auditor helped the pc in favor of keeping quiet.

So the auditor continues on with session with a massively missed
whole track GPM withhold on the pc, and the next day the pc is gone and
never comes back.

He KNOWS the Auditor is a jerk, and so is the whole Church.

So when you are trying to handle this in blown pcs or staff members
of the Church, and there are thousands of them, you gotta find out
what's going on with the person and why he blew.

Well be blew for exactly three reasons:

'Spot a goal.'
'Spot a barrier.'
'Spot a freedom.'

The barrier to freedom ratio became too large and so he left.

No one in the church wants to know what the pc did because they
don't want to know what they did and so withholds are missed routinely,
by COVERT POLICY, so neither pc nor auditor gets better and the whole
thing goes to hell.

Remember the amnesia the preclear has of his past is
TRAUMATIC amnesia.

Let that sit for a bit until its ramifications hit home.

He thinks he is mortal because his immortality was unbearable.

If withholds were not missed, no one would ever leave the church,
they would love it, and things would be fine.

That's what Churchs are for, confessions, you know.

If people are leaving the Church it is only because withholds are
being missed.

Now don't get me wrong here, it's not that the pc has done
something wrong, and someone failed to find out what he was holding on
to so tight no one could get it out of him with a crow bar.

No, that's not what happens.

Admittedly pcs have withheld from the world at large so hard and
for so long they no longer know how to unwithhold, and they no longer
know what it is they are withholding.

But pcs are coming into the Church in order to give a confession,
they WANT to give a confession, they want HELP giving a confession, they
are prepared to give it ALL to the first God King that asks them to pick
up the cans, and they have put down thousands of dollars to keep those
God Kings in hamburgers.

When they don't get what they came in for, they get real pissed off
and leave.

'What good is being a God King if you can't even pull one damn
withhold! To hell with you.'

There's the withhold you see, eternal separation.

So the pc leaves.

And when a preclear leaves his church, he is not messing around.

So many years later you find him nattering about the Church,
licking his wounds, sour on clear tech, committing more overt acts, and
generally winding down in life.

So you ask him,

'What did you first come into Scientology to handle?'
'Did it get handled?'
'If not, why?'

You run this over and over again in sequence much as you would run
the goals, barriers, freedoms thing until he realizes that his withhold
was missed, probably on purpose, if convulsively.

Now you want him to start running goals, barriers and freedoms,
until he starts to cognite that much of the overload on barriers in his
life arise from his withholds of action because of regret and wrong
doing, and breaking agreements and making mistakes and generally being a
screw ball of magnitude.

Look, an OT in fine condition doesn't fool around with games, if
they are even slightly too easy to play, the OT wins.

BOOOORRRRRRIIIINNNNNGGGG.

So the OT will go to GREAT lengths to limit himself right to the
razor's edge of disability to give him the hardest game he can muster
without guaranteeing a loss. This happens over a long period of time of
playing many games and winning far to many of them.

Games involve taking responsibility for other's well being and
having other's do the same for one's own.

When responsibility comes a cropper the result is unbearable
regret and self loathing.

Since self love powers the game and all creativity, you can see
where that might lead.

So an OT who is a wizened old coot will always be on the borderline
of too little ability. When he wins it will always be by the skin of
his teeth, the closest close calls imaginable, and those are the wins he
enjoys the most.

You know, Cornell is behind Princeton 3 touchdowns, and everyone
gets up to leave in the last 10 minutes, and Cornell gets 4 touchdowns
in the last 3 minutes and no one was there to see it.

THOSE are the kind of games OT's like, maybe everyone else left,
but the players were still there, and the OT was still there losing
until the last minute when he had a come back that would never be
forgotten.

The point is the OT has zero margin of error in this kind of life,
he messes up once and he is done for.

So why are withhold's so important? Because a withhold is a
withholding of ability, a LESSENING of ability in a being who can not
afford to be one bit more unable than he already is, or he will lose
forever. He has arranged it this way, and the moment he gets a withhold
his margin of error is gone, and he starts losing for good.

And losing a game doesn't mean he loses the trophy, losing a game
means OTHER PEOPLE GET HURT.

If he is not able to solo his way out of this mess, then he will
get stuck in a dwindling spiral of self loathing and self denial, and
that will be the end of him, he will lose every game he plays from there
on out.

Worse he will desperately try to WIN games by committing MORE overt
acts which get him into MORE regret and withholds, which lead him
eventually to playing the game of trying to kill himself.

And that's a game he can't win no matter how hard he tries.

He becomes Joe Mortal, S(c)eptic At Large.

Now look this is very serious.

You got a God King, not only thinking he is going to die, but
WANTING to die.

Remind me again, exactly how you get an infinite source of
self love to hate itself to death?

You come along and offer to help him out of this mess, and he will
take your head off.

You are nothing but a joke to him.

A really bad joke.

Suggesting to a being in this state that he can get better will be
taken by him as kicking a man when he's down.

But let's say you have done your Hubbard Hard Sell Course and you
tell him, 'Look I know you have had it rough, but we can help you', and
you explain to him all the stuff I have been saying here, and finally he
looks up at you and says, 'Ok well maybe I will come in for auditing.'

You tell him 'Well great, there is just one thing, it will cost you
$3000 an intensive for this help, you got any money?'

He looks real sad, shakes his head, but then he reaches into his
coat pocket and pulls out his last bottle of wine and holds it out to
you.

If you're smart you'll say 'Good enough' and you'll take his gift
and you make an appointment.

Now look, what you are trying to find on this case is the withhold
that pushed him over the line from self loving to self loathing for
real.

But the line he was playing was some enormous Goal, Barrier,
Freedom thing, where the odds were against him and the dependencies
with others were absolute.

He goes down, they go down.

If you miss that withhold, or if you refuse to confront it
yourself, or if you invalidate it, or if you don't even ask for it, you
will just crush him back down into his failure because this God King has
50 percent of his power already opposing himself and that was when he
was doing good.

That was when he could win with a prayer to the God of Close Calls.

Now he is a mess, and he is willing to give you his last bottle of
wine only because you came across with some of that Golden Light that he
used to have before he came to live in vomit.

If you let him down, if you fail to get the withhold, if you flinch
at the last moment and make him forget what he is talking about mid
cognition, if you make him fold up or wonder if you are really a safe
terminal to unburden to, you will merely be kicking a God King when he
is down, and he will get you for it someday.

So don't do it, if you value your friends.

Charge them all you want for your service, but do not fail to
deliver that service.

Now if you happen to pick up this fellow after he has already been
through this help become harm cycle once, say with the Church, you just
acknowledge that it didn't work, and then proceed to do it right.

You first run

'What did you come into Scientology to get handled?'
'Did it get handled?'
'If not, why not?'

repetitively until he cognites that he has a constellation of
problems, overts, withholds, upsets and computations.

Then you run

'Spot a goal'
'Spot a barrier'
'Spot a freedom'

until he cognites what the goal was that he has that mess on,
making sure that you take any confessions that he has to give along the
way. Once he gets the goal, the actual withholds will start coming off
with great relief.

Now you might say, well why would you want to rehabilitate this
guy's desire to be in the Church, I mean look what they did to him.
Wouldn't he better off in the field?

The answer is, that depends.

The OT is interested in his own goals, not yours. If his goal is
'To build a better Church', then that is where he belongs.

If his goal is something else, then maybe he would be better off in
the field.

You NEVER audit someone to make them more acceptable to you.

If you don't like the direction his goal is going in, if you find
that you are auditing the competition, then charge him more for your
services, but for heavens sake do it right, audit him on HIS goal, not
yours.

He WILL return the favor to you someday.

The Church assumes that everyone would be better off in the Church.

This is just simply not true.

For some, being in the Church was a substitute for being in the
field and being able to do research and help the science grow. There
WAS no field, no one told them there was a field, so they stayed in the
Church.

Someone like this might have the goal 'To start a new religion.'

For others being in the field is a substitute for being in the
Church and they are sad they can't get in, money, ethics conditions,
prior associations (EST etc) whatever.

The Church is not a bad thing, it is a good thing, it is a game
that certain OT's are playing real hard. They are just doing a lousy
job of it, their attacks against the field being but a part of their
grand dance of continuous present time overts.

You might ask, well why is it so bad in the Church?

I would answer very simply:

Because the word SOVEREIGNTY is not part of their vocabulary.

Try it sometime, ask any Scientologist in good standing what
Sovereingty is and what it has to do with his present case condition.

Chances are he will tell you Sovereignty is something that Kings
had in far off lands long ago.

Ask him if he is a God King himself, and watch his eyes fall.

Perhaps if more people in the Church were to read these postings on
Sovereignty there would be far fewer blows from the Church, except maybe
in upper management where a few of the very worst would blow when they
realized their little game of enslaving God Kings was up.

In general though, any time someone feels like blowing from an area
of help, there is something wrong with the help. If there are competing
areas of help it is not a blow for one area of help to help you over to
the other area of help, if that is where you belong.

I am not opposed to the Church, no doubt a testament to my own
auditing on the matter. The Church is one of many games that some very
big beings are playing on this planet. The field is too.

The beings who are responsible for the field and the Church do not
necessarily wish each other out of existence forever for free, they
understand that competition creates quality in product and service.

The Church is up to its ears in competition right now, you notice
that Fleming said he was an OT 16, the Church hasn't even released OT 10
yet.

So the players in this game do not hate each other, in fact they
invite the cooperation and competition that they all know they need to
survive.

Perhaps those with a lower view wish the other side out of
existence, and perhaps some of these blokes are upper management in the
Church.

You know, their 'Kill a chipmunk for Christ' campaign.

So, no I am not against the Church. I am an auditor, and as such I
do not take sides in the matter of which game is a good game or which is
a bad game.

I only audit towards OPTIMUM game, which means a game that can
continue and grow and not end with either side winning with the defeat
of the other.

Especially when the only game that either side can find to play
seems to be internecine squabbling with each other.

A lot of nut cases are playing the game to end the game.

Imagine a football team trying to KILL OFF the other side?

That's what some in the Church is doing to the FreeZone and anyone
else with a free mind trying to help.

Those who are used to the good/evil dichotomy seem to think that it
would be a good thing if evil were wiped out tomorrow, it would give the
good some rest. Indeed it would, but soon the good would be chosing up
sides again, 'Hey guys, anyone wanna play war? You be good, I will be
evil' and they would start the whole thing all over again.

A thetan's motto is, 'The game must go on.'

The purpose of creating a game is not to win or to lose, but to
PLAY. When the game ends, everyone loses.

If you want a hint of the sorrow of games ending, just picture a
hundred billion years down the road every one has gone clear and OT, and
there are no more games left to play in this universe and its time for
everone to part and go back to the big sleep in the sky and we are all
waving good bye to each other as this big 'THE END' sign comes up over
the universe probably to the last strains of Grieg's A minor concerto.

This dream ends forever when the circle of friends are all holding
hands again.

A million trillion little thetans all waving 'bye!' to each other.

So, you see a thetan will do ANYTHING to keep the game going.

So as an auditor I do not want to see the Church go down, or close
its doors.

I do want to see it stop producing as its valuable final product
ruined games and destroyed lives.

Just as I would audit a pc, I would audit the entire Church,

'What game did you originally set out to play?'
'Have you been playing it?'
'If not why not?'

until they realized they had a constellative mess with problems,
overts, withholds. upsets and computations.

Then I would find that mess with,

'Spot a game'
'Spot a barrier'
'Spot a freedom'

until I got the goal, the game and the withhold (refusal to play)
that crashed it all down.

NO ONE IS AUDITING THE CHURCH.

It is stuck in one great big huge self audit.

The Church is a pc who has been allowed to blow session and nurture
and fester its own withholds.

When your auditor screws you over its time for you to pick up the
meter and tell your auditor to pick up the cans.

Even if he is bigger than you.

Then when he can audit again, you can be the pc again.

If he succeeds and does right by you, be sure to pay him a
hamburger.

Homer

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Wed Mar 1 12:06:02 EST 2017
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/sci26.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFYtv97URT1lqxE3HERAt78AJ94On5TIdKSvUeTb0OFwmdHoPMafgCeOL7q
F2gaKRyKC2qUpdpjt5ZN4A8=
=3xUb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l

ADORE654 (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


CLEAR

Nirvana knows no segregation.

It is inconceivable that anyone could go clear with the extant
tech of Standard Scientology, circa 1985.

Oh sure perhaps if you define being clear as a worm on a stump who
is well aligned with his purpose to be a worm on a stump.

But has he attained a fearless future?

I don't think so.

Now some people will walk into the Church who already have that
ability, and they get some auditing, and they clean it up well, and they
recognize they have that ability, and they write up a success story, "I
just attested to a fearless future" on my Bogged Down Rundown.

Well that's fine, but he had already attained a fearless future
playing craps off the belt of Orion many ages ago. His auditing merely
reminded him of it and pointed it out to him.

But I tell you, if anyone actually went CLEAR, they would simply
never be able to wipe the smile off their face,

And they would have to wear sun glasses just to keep the light from
shining OUT.

Remember those straight laced, straight faced people that used to
walk around at Org parties and whisper in your ear 'Keep your ethics in
and you will go clear too.'

That wasn't good TR's (personal presence), that was no one home.

Basically finding one's own immortality is the result of seeking
love for your fellow man. All of 'em.

When you find that affinity it takes you back to Native State,
which is a smile as wide and unkillable as eternity.

If God's love is eternal, it follows that if you contact that love,
you will contact your eternality.

As if anyone ever needed proof that the soul is God incarnation,
but there it is.

Homer

(TR's are training routines designed to help the auditor not crack
up or laugh at things the pc says in session lest the pc be distracted
from the session. Done to extreme, 'good' TR's leads to robotic
feelingless sessions. An Auditor that can't smile in session, can't
match the pc's tone, and thus can never produce a floating needle or an
end result.)

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Thu Mar 12 18:02:54 EDT 2009

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Tue Feb 28 12:06:02 EST 2017
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore654.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFYta37URT1lqxE3HERAuJoAJ9ox2ziXHHnYZnQMqvJsGex4mE87gCgmCMB
SR8XRh0aD+kera2FZH/lqM0=
=mfQa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l