-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
MORTAL, IMMORTAL AND ETERNAL
Run
Tell me about or get the idea of:
Wanting to be Mortal.
Not wanting to be Mortal.
Wanting to be Immortal (in time).
Not wanting to be Immortal (in time).
Wanting to be Eternal (out of time).
Not wanting to be Eternal (out of time).
Round and round.
Homer
Tue Jun 6 05:07:19 EDT 2017
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Tue Dec 17 12:00:05 EST 2019
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/sessio14.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFd+QmVURT1lqxE3HERAoToAKDAXTqBeWuKE4sIeLYUt8sXwwNZGwCgwjsZ
d7+GKlepDLfd3na9GNF0xMI=
=lXT9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Tuesday, December 17, 2019
Sunday, December 15, 2019
HOM5 (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS AGAIN AND AGAIN
Alan Walter said:
> Homer does make case gain, if that's who you are talking about.
I do?
Now Alan, this is not a criticism, nor a personal attack, just the
Facts Jack, ok? Please don't get red in the face, please don't get
angry, please remain my friend, ok?
Actually Alan's write up about L&N makes me sad.
For one it is a "Need help" writeup, there is no hope the pc can
do it for himself.
Secondly it posits thousands of out-lists, endless complexity
etc, making the pc feel it is going to take thousands of hours and
endless amounts of dollars etc to get all this handled.
Thirdly it doesn't indicate, which makes the first two grate
even worse.
It produces a No Hope and No Peace reaction in me.
Here is my analysis.
In the first place the Question is
"What's this THING in my body?" or
"What's this all about?" or
"What's going on here?"
The answer changes as each layer comes off, I hope for a last
answer, but so far haven't found one.
But more importantly, the QUESTION is more important than the
ANSWER, and perhaps that is the answer to "What is wrong with me?"
Answer: I am trying to find the answer to the question, rather
than as-is the question.
Most pcs can't imagine asking a question without trying to get
the answer. They can't see the EFFORT to ask the question, because
they are too busy straining to find the ANSWER.
It is quite an accomplishment to be able to finally ask a question,
without trying to get the answer at all. One does this to observe
the efforts involved in the question.
One way to practice this is to ask a question which you know
the answer to and see if you can ask it without having the answer
come forward, like "What is my name?"
Then one sees that the efforts to ask the question are more
damaging in terms of ridges and impacted masses, than not knowing the
answer is.
Answers cool out questions, because the pc stops asking the question,
not because the answer is right! Wrong answers can also cause more
questions which then leads to endless cave in.
This is possibly why the Zen Master give a Koan to their
preclears, it is an unanswerable question. The intent is to get the
pc asking questions that guarantee there is no answer to look at, so
that finally the pc looks as the process of asking itself without
answering and starts to blow charge.
Thus "What question are you asking" is itself a listing question
of sorts, although it has many answers, but I would think that the
handling would NOT be to then get the 'correct' answer to any of those
questions, but to run something that would run out the asking of all
those questions which the pc lists.
This takes an awful lot of confront of NOT KNOW, the pc has to be
willing to HAVE not knowing the answer to all these questions, but he
will cool out the restim on his masses significantly if he can do so.
Questions like Why am I here?, Who am I? What am I supposed to
be doing?, What's my purpose?, When did I come in?, How do I get out?
All the basic Who, How, What, Where and Why's that drive the pc mad
through the trillenia.
Adore would have you spot the question and then ask it WITHOUT
ANSWERING IT, until the charge is off.
"The caliber of the caliper of souls is
The Questions they have asked, and
The Answers they have rejected."
Ultimately native state has no answers, in this sense ALL
answers to questions are false and are out items.
Thus auditing the asking of questions, instead of the answering
of questions, might lead to more fruitful results and bypass the need
for all the 'powerful' complexity that makes others necessary in the
game of case gain.
Perhaps we could call this the OT Q&A rundown, as LRH said the
only aberration there is waiting for an answer. Adore says the only
aberration there is is LOOKING FOR AN ANSWER BY BEING AN EFFECT,
but its the same thing. This is because the true answer to the
question is the exact duplication of the question and its implied
not know, at which point the not know blows and the prior know
arises. This is not an effort thing to learn by looking, this is
at worst an effort thing to duplicate the not know on the prior know.
Alan's message comes across to me as people can not help
themselves until they have been helped by others at great expense.
Adore's message is you can help yourself if you would simply
observe yourself asking how.
The logic behind this is simple, when the unwanted condition was
originally created, there was no question going on in the background
asking "how do I get rid of this, where do I get help for this etc?
One gets rid of the condition by making it again, by exactly
duplicating the original efforts to create it, thus if you are asking
"What is this? How do I get rid of it? Who is going to help me?
When it is going to happen? Why am I suffering from it?" you aren't
duplicating the efforts at the moment of creation of the condition
because those questions were not going on at the time.
On the other hand, if there were questions going on at the time
of the original creation, and the efforts of those questions are still
being asked consciously or unconsciously in present time, then that
question asking alone will keep the incident in full bloom.
Adore says that questions stick us to incidents, nothing else.
Thus the way to run the incident is not to ask "How do I run
this incident?" but to run the question you were asking in the
incident!
Notice that the incident question is NOT "What question was I
asking in the incident?"
Asking "What question was I asking in the incident?" is
self auditing. This is the figure-figure LRH talked about.
Running the asking of the question in the incident, particularly
its efforts and ridges of failure, whether or not you know what that
question is, is solo auditing. This is in fact very effective effort
processing.
Adore says that this effort processing gets at the postulate in
the incident because ultimately all postulates relate to being unable to
know and answer the damn question!
Thus spotting the extant questions in present time, NOT TO ANSWER
THEM BUT TO COOL THE ASKING, will go a long ways to bringing the
original incident to the foreground and allow you to run the rest of it
out.
LRH says the pc is trying to solve problems in the present by
using efforts he used against problems in the past. If what Adore
says is true, the basic problem is an unanswerable question, thus the
efforts the pc is using to answer present time questions he knows he
is asking, will be the same efforts he used on the past track
questions in the incidents that are holding him down.
Since the past track efforts do not properly match his present
time questions, he will be both failing to answer his present time
questions AND restimulating his past track overwhelms.
Freedom from overwhelm is also freedom from overwhelm about
asking and answering questions.
This listing and running the present time questions, AS QUESTIONS
NOT AS ANSWERS, will lead to the past track incidents and questions wherein
the pc first got entangled in misduplication of the know - not know
cycle and learning by looking at effects in order to know about cause,
(violations of the proof).
Misconstruing a know - not know cycle as a not know - know cycle
is a serious alter-is and might be the genesis of seriousness. If so,
then it is the seed of the joke.
Adore goes so far as to DEFINE an incident as a run in with a
question. AS the alter-is of know - not know takes place, the question
(not know) becomes an effort to learn by looking with no responsibility
for the not know. Thus rather than duplicate the not know thus blowing it
off, the pc gets into learning by looking.
Thus every incident on the mental plane is a violation of the
know - not know sequence by trying to indulge in answering a question
which is a not know - know sequence, and on the spiritual plane its a
violation of total responsibility.
The point is that the not know itself is created with postulate
and effort, so the way to erase that and know again is to duplicate
the effort to not know and the postulate, NOT indulge in MORE effort
to learn by looking which is a violation of The Proof.
It is the effort to learn by looking, to learn by being an
effect, to learn about cause by looking at effects, that pulls in all
sorts of stuff that you have assigned as cause that might teach you
what it is you want to know.
Learning and Teaching are dicoms.
If a cause has no effects on you, there is no way to learn
anything about it as a cause , nor have it teach you anything about it
as a cause, because all learning and teaching about cause takes place
via the effects that the cause has on you.
Since you are now trying to learn about cause by looking at
effects of that cause, you must become the effect of those causes,
and so of course you get impinged upon all over the place.
This is justice working.
If you say "I must know about cause, the only way to know about
cause is to look at its effects on me" then you shouldn't complain
when you find yourself the effect of those causes, eh?
Saving knowledge (knowledge that saves) does not reside in any
created thing, as salvation is salvation FROM all created things.
Learning by looking is what LRH called ransacking facsimiles,
although that falls short of the scope of what we are talking about
here, as beings will ransack all of creation, every other cause he can
think of in fact, to find what they are looking for, which ain't out
there anyhow.
Adore says one can know anything by not knowing some more.
Asking questions is not the way to do that.
Alan's message has a very negative effect on me and is very
disheartening, because it appears to me he is trying to sell other
determinism as my salvation, namely him or any other good auditor,
with the implication that if only I had done it right by coming to him
in the first place before I struck out on my own, which I surely
should have known better than to do, I would be ok by now.
I don't think Alan is capable of duplicating how much this
stance grates on me.
It in fact violates every principle I stand by.
Remember it is not the message of help that grates on me,
it is the apparent message of *NEED* beyond my willingness to need,
help.
If instead of saying
"Homer come to me and we will list all those questions you have
been asking and find the correct answer to all them which you in your
grand role as Supreme Dodo were not able to do, and you will be all better."
he said,
"Homer shut the fuck up, get on a meter or whatever, and list
out all the questions you are asking, and run the asking of them
without any effort to actually find the answer until you hit a blow
out of peace."
I would have felt much better about it.
But what do I know. I am not an Emperor nor an Ambassador, just
a Joker in the King's Court.
Homer
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sun Dec 15 12:00:03 EST 2019
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/hom5.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFd9maUURT1lqxE3HERAitHAJ9A21YttWVMrWW7jS9YkrCV6u4dYQCfTay/
YqOBGYlX7UYklHN9J91iLbQ=
=yFdb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS AGAIN AND AGAIN
Alan Walter said:
> Homer does make case gain, if that's who you are talking about.
I do?
Now Alan, this is not a criticism, nor a personal attack, just the
Facts Jack, ok? Please don't get red in the face, please don't get
angry, please remain my friend, ok?
Actually Alan's write up about L&N makes me sad.
For one it is a "Need help" writeup, there is no hope the pc can
do it for himself.
Secondly it posits thousands of out-lists, endless complexity
etc, making the pc feel it is going to take thousands of hours and
endless amounts of dollars etc to get all this handled.
Thirdly it doesn't indicate, which makes the first two grate
even worse.
It produces a No Hope and No Peace reaction in me.
Here is my analysis.
In the first place the Question is
"What's this THING in my body?" or
"What's this all about?" or
"What's going on here?"
The answer changes as each layer comes off, I hope for a last
answer, but so far haven't found one.
But more importantly, the QUESTION is more important than the
ANSWER, and perhaps that is the answer to "What is wrong with me?"
Answer: I am trying to find the answer to the question, rather
than as-is the question.
Most pcs can't imagine asking a question without trying to get
the answer. They can't see the EFFORT to ask the question, because
they are too busy straining to find the ANSWER.
It is quite an accomplishment to be able to finally ask a question,
without trying to get the answer at all. One does this to observe
the efforts involved in the question.
One way to practice this is to ask a question which you know
the answer to and see if you can ask it without having the answer
come forward, like "What is my name?"
Then one sees that the efforts to ask the question are more
damaging in terms of ridges and impacted masses, than not knowing the
answer is.
Answers cool out questions, because the pc stops asking the question,
not because the answer is right! Wrong answers can also cause more
questions which then leads to endless cave in.
This is possibly why the Zen Master give a Koan to their
preclears, it is an unanswerable question. The intent is to get the
pc asking questions that guarantee there is no answer to look at, so
that finally the pc looks as the process of asking itself without
answering and starts to blow charge.
Thus "What question are you asking" is itself a listing question
of sorts, although it has many answers, but I would think that the
handling would NOT be to then get the 'correct' answer to any of those
questions, but to run something that would run out the asking of all
those questions which the pc lists.
This takes an awful lot of confront of NOT KNOW, the pc has to be
willing to HAVE not knowing the answer to all these questions, but he
will cool out the restim on his masses significantly if he can do so.
Questions like Why am I here?, Who am I? What am I supposed to
be doing?, What's my purpose?, When did I come in?, How do I get out?
All the basic Who, How, What, Where and Why's that drive the pc mad
through the trillenia.
Adore would have you spot the question and then ask it WITHOUT
ANSWERING IT, until the charge is off.
"The caliber of the caliper of souls is
The Questions they have asked, and
The Answers they have rejected."
Ultimately native state has no answers, in this sense ALL
answers to questions are false and are out items.
Thus auditing the asking of questions, instead of the answering
of questions, might lead to more fruitful results and bypass the need
for all the 'powerful' complexity that makes others necessary in the
game of case gain.
Perhaps we could call this the OT Q&A rundown, as LRH said the
only aberration there is waiting for an answer. Adore says the only
aberration there is is LOOKING FOR AN ANSWER BY BEING AN EFFECT,
but its the same thing. This is because the true answer to the
question is the exact duplication of the question and its implied
not know, at which point the not know blows and the prior know
arises. This is not an effort thing to learn by looking, this is
at worst an effort thing to duplicate the not know on the prior know.
Alan's message comes across to me as people can not help
themselves until they have been helped by others at great expense.
Adore's message is you can help yourself if you would simply
observe yourself asking how.
The logic behind this is simple, when the unwanted condition was
originally created, there was no question going on in the background
asking "how do I get rid of this, where do I get help for this etc?
One gets rid of the condition by making it again, by exactly
duplicating the original efforts to create it, thus if you are asking
"What is this? How do I get rid of it? Who is going to help me?
When it is going to happen? Why am I suffering from it?" you aren't
duplicating the efforts at the moment of creation of the condition
because those questions were not going on at the time.
On the other hand, if there were questions going on at the time
of the original creation, and the efforts of those questions are still
being asked consciously or unconsciously in present time, then that
question asking alone will keep the incident in full bloom.
Adore says that questions stick us to incidents, nothing else.
Thus the way to run the incident is not to ask "How do I run
this incident?" but to run the question you were asking in the
incident!
Notice that the incident question is NOT "What question was I
asking in the incident?"
Asking "What question was I asking in the incident?" is
self auditing. This is the figure-figure LRH talked about.
Running the asking of the question in the incident, particularly
its efforts and ridges of failure, whether or not you know what that
question is, is solo auditing. This is in fact very effective effort
processing.
Adore says that this effort processing gets at the postulate in
the incident because ultimately all postulates relate to being unable to
know and answer the damn question!
Thus spotting the extant questions in present time, NOT TO ANSWER
THEM BUT TO COOL THE ASKING, will go a long ways to bringing the
original incident to the foreground and allow you to run the rest of it
out.
LRH says the pc is trying to solve problems in the present by
using efforts he used against problems in the past. If what Adore
says is true, the basic problem is an unanswerable question, thus the
efforts the pc is using to answer present time questions he knows he
is asking, will be the same efforts he used on the past track
questions in the incidents that are holding him down.
Since the past track efforts do not properly match his present
time questions, he will be both failing to answer his present time
questions AND restimulating his past track overwhelms.
Freedom from overwhelm is also freedom from overwhelm about
asking and answering questions.
This listing and running the present time questions, AS QUESTIONS
NOT AS ANSWERS, will lead to the past track incidents and questions wherein
the pc first got entangled in misduplication of the know - not know
cycle and learning by looking at effects in order to know about cause,
(violations of the proof).
Misconstruing a know - not know cycle as a not know - know cycle
is a serious alter-is and might be the genesis of seriousness. If so,
then it is the seed of the joke.
Adore goes so far as to DEFINE an incident as a run in with a
question. AS the alter-is of know - not know takes place, the question
(not know) becomes an effort to learn by looking with no responsibility
for the not know. Thus rather than duplicate the not know thus blowing it
off, the pc gets into learning by looking.
Thus every incident on the mental plane is a violation of the
know - not know sequence by trying to indulge in answering a question
which is a not know - know sequence, and on the spiritual plane its a
violation of total responsibility.
The point is that the not know itself is created with postulate
and effort, so the way to erase that and know again is to duplicate
the effort to not know and the postulate, NOT indulge in MORE effort
to learn by looking which is a violation of The Proof.
It is the effort to learn by looking, to learn by being an
effect, to learn about cause by looking at effects, that pulls in all
sorts of stuff that you have assigned as cause that might teach you
what it is you want to know.
Learning and Teaching are dicoms.
If a cause has no effects on you, there is no way to learn
anything about it as a cause , nor have it teach you anything about it
as a cause, because all learning and teaching about cause takes place
via the effects that the cause has on you.
Since you are now trying to learn about cause by looking at
effects of that cause, you must become the effect of those causes,
and so of course you get impinged upon all over the place.
This is justice working.
If you say "I must know about cause, the only way to know about
cause is to look at its effects on me" then you shouldn't complain
when you find yourself the effect of those causes, eh?
Saving knowledge (knowledge that saves) does not reside in any
created thing, as salvation is salvation FROM all created things.
Learning by looking is what LRH called ransacking facsimiles,
although that falls short of the scope of what we are talking about
here, as beings will ransack all of creation, every other cause he can
think of in fact, to find what they are looking for, which ain't out
there anyhow.
Adore says one can know anything by not knowing some more.
Asking questions is not the way to do that.
Alan's message has a very negative effect on me and is very
disheartening, because it appears to me he is trying to sell other
determinism as my salvation, namely him or any other good auditor,
with the implication that if only I had done it right by coming to him
in the first place before I struck out on my own, which I surely
should have known better than to do, I would be ok by now.
I don't think Alan is capable of duplicating how much this
stance grates on me.
It in fact violates every principle I stand by.
Remember it is not the message of help that grates on me,
it is the apparent message of *NEED* beyond my willingness to need,
help.
If instead of saying
"Homer come to me and we will list all those questions you have
been asking and find the correct answer to all them which you in your
grand role as Supreme Dodo were not able to do, and you will be all better."
he said,
"Homer shut the fuck up, get on a meter or whatever, and list
out all the questions you are asking, and run the asking of them
without any effort to actually find the answer until you hit a blow
out of peace."
I would have felt much better about it.
But what do I know. I am not an Emperor nor an Ambassador, just
a Joker in the King's Court.
Homer
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sun Dec 15 12:00:03 EST 2019
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/hom5.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFd9maUURT1lqxE3HERAitHAJ9A21YttWVMrWW7jS9YkrCV6u4dYQCfTay/
YqOBGYlX7UYklHN9J91iLbQ=
=yFdb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Wednesday, December 11, 2019
COPS AND THE CONSTITUTION
COPS AND THE CONSTITUTION
Do not look to a cop to understand constitutional issues.
Cops work for the government who filters out those who can
understand constitutional issues.
Cops can understand AUTHORTY real well, but understand RESTRAINTS
on authority not so much.
The government is fundamentally anti constitutional, they are
interested only in their own security and persistence through financial
gain and power for its own sake.
Thus the only part of 'constitution' the government understands is
a police state.
That makes cops feel warm and fuzzy inside because it implies job
security as long as they obey orders without question and gives them
their license to violence which they crave so deeply.
The government will claim that in order to protect and serve you,
they need to protect and serve themselves, at your expense and
collateral damage.
Thus we have peace and security through silence and compliance,
which is a corrupt government's one and only modus operandi for
appearing to serve the people when in fact it is serving itself at the
expense of the people.
At some point, when the people begin to question the government and
its level of collateral damage to person, property and rights, and
alternative governments begin to vie for attention promising less
collateral damage, the incumbent government will call them terrorists,
not because they terrorize the people, but because they terrorize THE
GOVERNMENT.
Understand this now.
Many times when somsone says they have to hurt you to help you
without your permission and at the point of a gun, they really want to
help themseves at your expense.
The definintion of evil is:
Saying something is good for you, when in fact it is good for THEM
and bad for you, usually fatal, and they know it.
Dig it and don't leave it.
Homer
Tue Dec 27 07:06:01 EST 2016
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Do not look to a cop to understand constitutional issues.
Cops work for the government who filters out those who can
understand constitutional issues.
Cops can understand AUTHORTY real well, but understand RESTRAINTS
on authority not so much.
The government is fundamentally anti constitutional, they are
interested only in their own security and persistence through financial
gain and power for its own sake.
Thus the only part of 'constitution' the government understands is
a police state.
That makes cops feel warm and fuzzy inside because it implies job
security as long as they obey orders without question and gives them
their license to violence which they crave so deeply.
The government will claim that in order to protect and serve you,
they need to protect and serve themselves, at your expense and
collateral damage.
Thus we have peace and security through silence and compliance,
which is a corrupt government's one and only modus operandi for
appearing to serve the people when in fact it is serving itself at the
expense of the people.
At some point, when the people begin to question the government and
its level of collateral damage to person, property and rights, and
alternative governments begin to vie for attention promising less
collateral damage, the incumbent government will call them terrorists,
not because they terrorize the people, but because they terrorize THE
GOVERNMENT.
Understand this now.
Many times when somsone says they have to hurt you to help you
without your permission and at the point of a gun, they really want to
help themseves at your expense.
The definintion of evil is:
Saying something is good for you, when in fact it is good for THEM
and bad for you, usually fatal, and they know it.
Dig it and don't leave it.
Homer
Tue Dec 27 07:06:01 EST 2016
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Tuesday, December 10, 2019
ADORE261 (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Words fail.
If you accept the basic axioms of scientology that basic truth is
a static, no space, NO TIME, etc, then you have to accept that from
this static comes kenetics, MEST, space and time etc.
The issue at question is that of time and timelessness.
How can the timeless then BECOME the timeful if there is no time
in which to make the change?
Doesn't change imply time?
First one has to observe that many have reported the timeless
state, and although they yammer much while trying to describe it, one
has to admit something is there.
So perhaps we have this unified whole that has both a time and a
no time aspect to it.
As beings living in the 4D space/time game stream we can not
imagine the no time situation. We can imagine no motion, but no time
exceeds us.
Perhaps we have alter-ised perceptions of time and no time, thus
making it impossible for us to see the as-issnes of both time and no
time.
It's easy to see how space could be holographic, an illusion of
space in a substrate that doesn't have space, but its much harder to
see how time could be holographic also, an illusion of time in a
substrate that doesn't have time.
The nameless dreams the nameable.
Source sources what source is not.
The idea is to give up the preconceptions, and let the world come
in as it may. It won't be what was expected, and expectations of what
there is to find will stop the process.
If you are looking for A, you won't find B, let alone Z.
First thing you have to understand is you are dreaming together
with others, just like a sleep dream. Space/time are illusions in
consciousness which itself doesn't have dimension, either spatial or
temporal. All beings are on the same 'point' as it were.
"People think they are looking at the same object from two
separate viewpoints, when in fact they are looking at two objects from
the same viewpoint." - LRH
The two objects are each person's dream rendition of what they
are looking at.
Once you get that, then the world of exteriorization opens up.
Remember if you think exteriorizing means moving out of your
body, it will never happen. Exteriorizing means the thetan is going
NOWHERE and moving the universe around him so he has repositioned it
so he is in a new viewpoint inside it.
Moving yourself 3 feet out of your body, and moving the whole
universe 3 feet from you are two totally different things.
The second may work.
The first doesn't.
Homer
crtism@cox.net wrote:
>I don't know, this exterior thing is gettin a bit crazy.
>How does static outside this universe decide to move and then can get
>itself into a position that it might be able to go exterior to a body
>in this universe?
>Static is nothing, how can it move Homer? It's not even an
>impingement!!
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Tue Dec 10 12:00:04 EST 2019
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore261.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFd788VURT1lqxE3HERAhSmAKCqOkkpxXdAG24HVqgDX2Zpn10e3gCgyKLV
RUN8HD5S2z1J++C1R4K6hRI=
=E6n0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
Words fail.
If you accept the basic axioms of scientology that basic truth is
a static, no space, NO TIME, etc, then you have to accept that from
this static comes kenetics, MEST, space and time etc.
The issue at question is that of time and timelessness.
How can the timeless then BECOME the timeful if there is no time
in which to make the change?
Doesn't change imply time?
First one has to observe that many have reported the timeless
state, and although they yammer much while trying to describe it, one
has to admit something is there.
So perhaps we have this unified whole that has both a time and a
no time aspect to it.
As beings living in the 4D space/time game stream we can not
imagine the no time situation. We can imagine no motion, but no time
exceeds us.
Perhaps we have alter-ised perceptions of time and no time, thus
making it impossible for us to see the as-issnes of both time and no
time.
It's easy to see how space could be holographic, an illusion of
space in a substrate that doesn't have space, but its much harder to
see how time could be holographic also, an illusion of time in a
substrate that doesn't have time.
The nameless dreams the nameable.
Source sources what source is not.
The idea is to give up the preconceptions, and let the world come
in as it may. It won't be what was expected, and expectations of what
there is to find will stop the process.
If you are looking for A, you won't find B, let alone Z.
First thing you have to understand is you are dreaming together
with others, just like a sleep dream. Space/time are illusions in
consciousness which itself doesn't have dimension, either spatial or
temporal. All beings are on the same 'point' as it were.
"People think they are looking at the same object from two
separate viewpoints, when in fact they are looking at two objects from
the same viewpoint." - LRH
The two objects are each person's dream rendition of what they
are looking at.
Once you get that, then the world of exteriorization opens up.
Remember if you think exteriorizing means moving out of your
body, it will never happen. Exteriorizing means the thetan is going
NOWHERE and moving the universe around him so he has repositioned it
so he is in a new viewpoint inside it.
Moving yourself 3 feet out of your body, and moving the whole
universe 3 feet from you are two totally different things.
The second may work.
The first doesn't.
Homer
crtism@cox.net wrote:
>I don't know, this exterior thing is gettin a bit crazy.
>How does static outside this universe decide to move and then can get
>itself into a position that it might be able to go exterior to a body
>in this universe?
>Static is nothing, how can it move Homer? It's not even an
>impingement!!
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Tue Dec 10 12:00:04 EST 2019
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore261.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFd788VURT1lqxE3HERAhSmAKCqOkkpxXdAG24HVqgDX2Zpn10e3gCgyKLV
RUN8HD5S2z1J++C1R4K6hRI=
=E6n0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Saturday, December 7, 2019
Exceptional Human Experiences
Lifted and snipped for discussion related to Clearing. This article can be
found at <http://www.ehe.org/display/ehe-page.cfm?ID=5>.
Exceptional Human Experiences: A Brief Overview
Rhea A. White, 1999.
pub: EHE Network, Inc.
(3rd ed., 1999)
copyright?2001 EHE Network, Inc.
?
Exceptional human experience is an umbrella term for anomalous experiences
that transform the individual who has them so that they are engaged in a
process of realizing their full human potential, which makes the
experience an exceptional human one. There are many types of experiences,
usually instances of the psychic, mystical, healing, death-related,
encounter, and desolation/nadir type, as well as those we call peak
experiences. We have been studying accounts of a broad range of over 200
types of anomalous experience to discover how many general characteristics
pertain across the whole class. See List of Potential EHEs. The reason
that we are looking at these experiences as a group is that they may be
points on a continuum, or else there may be connections between some if
not all of them, which we would not see if we only looked at them as
discrete experiences. For example, people who are not aware of ever having
had psychic experiences note that they start having them after they have
had near-death experiences, out-of-body experiences, multiple personality
episodes, UFO encounters, and other forms of anomalous experience.
Anomalous experiences are customarily treated as one-time events. Those
who take an interest in them usually examine all the data they can gather
concerning the event/experience itself and any relevant circumstances that
seem to lead up to it. Very little attention is given to the
experience/event?s aftereffects or its subjective qualities. In our
approach, we start with the experience, including any predisposing factors
and triggers. Then we take a close look not only at the objectively
verifiable components and the anomalous ones, but also the physical,
physiological, feeling, psychological, and spiritual components. Because
of their importance, our main concern has become the aftereffects. If an
experience does not have any lasting effect on the experiencer, it remains
simply an anomaly, and so can be viewed objectively as a one-time
happening, now finished. However, some anomalous experiences become
personalized. They become part of the experiencer?s life. They have become
exceptional experiences (EEs). These, in turn, can initiate a process that
has ongoing transformative aftereffects. Then the experience becomes an
exceptional human experience (EHE). We are very interested in the process
by which EHEs develop and in observing how they affect the experiencer
both immediately and during the rest of his or her life. We are especially
interested in any patterns that may emerge across both individuals and
different types of experiences.
Some exceptional experiences are more likely to become transformative than
others, such as mystical experiences, near-death experiences, and
out-of-body experiences. But perhaps any anomalous experience can become
an EHE, and we are interested in discovering if this is the case. We have
drawn up the following very preliminary list of ten characteristics that
seem to hold across several types of exceptional human experience.
1. All of these experiences, including those induced by drugs or hypnosis,
occur spontaneously, at least initially. They happen to you?you can?t
make them happen.
2. Each type of experience in one way or another is an experience of
transcendence, which means ?to rise above; surpass; exceed.? In an
out-of-body experience, for example, you have the experience of literally
rising above your body, being able to look down upon it as if from outside.
In near-death and post-death experiences, you seem to transcend the
boundary between life and death. In clairvoyance and telepathy, you
transcend space (and in the latter case, also personality). In
precognition, you transcend time; and so it goes.
3. Each one represents a new experience of the self, of who or what we are.
Whereas we previously assumed we were bound by time, space, our bodies,
personalities, individualities, and certainly death, these experiences
give the lie to that view. They tell us we are more than we thought we
were.
4. They are all experiences of connection, first to different levels of
ourselves, but also to others, to other forms of life, to the planet, to
the universe, and to the sacred.
5. Each is an experience of opening to a reality we were taught could not
be true. This opening occurs directly. That is, we don?t have to think
about it or question it?during the experience we are there. They also open
us inwardly, thus predisposing us to have further experiences, unless we
shut down the process through fear or misunderstanding of what is
happening.
6. Although EHEs are experiences of opening, connecting, and transcending,
the fact that there is no sense of separation applies both within and
without the person. There is no separation felt between mind and body, so
that you respond with your whole self. This means there is often an
orgasmic element in EHEs. You are in a heightened state physiologically,
psychologically, and spiritually. Physically, you can experience tingling,
swooning, rapid heartbeat, flush, raised hairs, goosebumps, and
breathlessness. A good test of an EHE is that you can feel it in your toes.
7. Although there are scholars and scientists willing to grant that these
experiences merit investigation, they have done so using the methods of
Western science and analysis. This has led to their being treated as
static events--one-time occurrences that, once they are over, are
considered done with. For example, an investigator might look into a dream
that X had in May 1991 that corresponded in considerable detail to an
event that occurred in June 1991, thus indicating that the dream could
have been precognitive. The investigator tries to find witnesses to both
dream and event. He or she compares the details of the dream with the
details of the event, notes the person?s age, sex, occupation, education,
etc., and when finished, adds this information to other such statistics.
It will most likely molder away in a file somewhere. We haven?t learned
anything that connects to anything else. Instead, we should view such
experiences not as one-time events comparable, say to one?s first tooth or
car, but more to one?s job or one?s significant relationships--in other
words, to experiences that occur within an ongoing process. Exceptional
experiences are more like seeds. They happen to us not like events but as
initiators of a process, waiting to unfold in us even as the oak tree
unfolds from the acorn, but with a major difference--the oak tree, as far
as we know, grows spontaneously and naturally. But the process that
unfolds in a human being, at least after a certain stage is reached,
requires our conscious cooperation and participation. We need to pay
attention to these experiences, try to glimpse what they may be telling us,
discern where they may be leading us, trust the visions they reveal to us,
and incorporate them in our lives. So, although initially they occur
spontaneously, they are invitations to participate in a process of growth
that requires our cooperation. Instead, we tend to shelve these
experiences, to repress them, and not tell others about them, because
although they may be exciting, thrilling, wonderful experiences in
themselves, in the context of the consensus worldview they are weird,
strange, unreal, or even sick. In this view, it is natural not to look to
them for insight and guidance.
8. In science everyone is looking for a new paradigm (or worldview) to
account for everything. Physicists are trying to account for the
mind-matter interface. Psychologists and philosophers call it the
mind-body relationship. We call EHEs preparadigmatic experiences, because
they seem to herald a new paradigm, or at the least, they fly in the face
of the one with which we now live. So each one really offers the
experiencer (and to some extent, those who read or hear about a given
experience) a window with a new view, and they provide an opportunity to
choose between belief and doubt. (This is an opportunity of unparalleled
importance.) The experiencer must decide whether to provisionally trust
the experience or explain it away or dismiss it. Those who choose to
believe find they have opened a door leading to additional experiences
that provide entrance to a world where their lives become charged with
meaning. They have entered what we call the Experiential Paradigm. Those
who doubt continue to remain encased in the familiar inhospitable and even
abusive arms of the worldview that has been with us since the
Enlightenment, which we were taught was the only reality. Many people?s
lives are chaotic and bereft of meaning, and many turn to drugs, not to
embrace the world, but to forget it.
9. What we need is a story that will unite science and spirituality, self
and world. But first it must occur at the individual level, which brings
us to the ninth characteristic. Each of us needs a story that charges our
daily lives with meaning and puts us personally in touch with the sacred.
There are many books about writing, or better yet, living your own story,
your own myth. But the myths of old contained an element that is missing
from most stories told today, and that is a link with the sacred.
Exceptional human experiences can serve as those links; they are those
happenings in our lives that can pull us out of boredom and disconnection
and into a world of meaning and connection. We have to learn how to honor
these experiences and let them into our lives. When a sufficient number of
people do that, the larger story will emerge. Exceptional human
experiences catapult us into the new paradigm. We become a part of it and
we discover it is a part of us. When we enter the Experiential Paradigm,
we are no longer apart from it. The scientific method cannot take us there.
But once we ourselves are there, and when we are willing to take the
further leap of sharing our experiences with others, we will not only be
inside the new view that is needed to join physical and spiritual, mind
and matter, body and mind, but we will also be playing a significant part
in transforming it into consensus reality. Once more, as in ages past, the
story of each human will be the story of humankind, and vice versa. We and
our times will be in step and able to move forward as one. Science can do
nothing but follow, as it is right that it should.
10. Creating one?s story is not simply something the experiencer can do
alone. Telling it in part involves living it out in some way (i.e., acting
on it). So only does it really become real to the experiencer and to
others. One of the first ways to do this is to tell others about it, in a
context where it seems relevant, even though it may be embarrassing or
difficult. By sharing our EHEs, the other person validates the experience,
even if he or she reacts negatively. But often the response is positive,
and when it is, the other person may be moved by the first person?s story
to share his or her EHEs as well. This heightens the sense of meaning and
reality for both in ways that go beyond simply describing one?s EHEs. A
process seems to be initiated by such interchanges that operates
independently of both persons and that leads to connectedness and
interconnections. One has entered into the process of spinning the web of
the new paradigm. We don?t think it out; we live out of it and into a new
way of being in the world. Then we can conceptualize it in the same way
that we open our eyes and see.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
found at <http://www.ehe.org/display/ehe-page.cfm?ID=5>.
Exceptional Human Experiences: A Brief Overview
Rhea A. White, 1999.
pub: EHE Network, Inc.
(3rd ed., 1999)
copyright?2001 EHE Network, Inc.
?
Exceptional human experience is an umbrella term for anomalous experiences
that transform the individual who has them so that they are engaged in a
process of realizing their full human potential, which makes the
experience an exceptional human one. There are many types of experiences,
usually instances of the psychic, mystical, healing, death-related,
encounter, and desolation/nadir type, as well as those we call peak
experiences. We have been studying accounts of a broad range of over 200
types of anomalous experience to discover how many general characteristics
pertain across the whole class. See List of Potential EHEs. The reason
that we are looking at these experiences as a group is that they may be
points on a continuum, or else there may be connections between some if
not all of them, which we would not see if we only looked at them as
discrete experiences. For example, people who are not aware of ever having
had psychic experiences note that they start having them after they have
had near-death experiences, out-of-body experiences, multiple personality
episodes, UFO encounters, and other forms of anomalous experience.
Anomalous experiences are customarily treated as one-time events. Those
who take an interest in them usually examine all the data they can gather
concerning the event/experience itself and any relevant circumstances that
seem to lead up to it. Very little attention is given to the
experience/event?s aftereffects or its subjective qualities. In our
approach, we start with the experience, including any predisposing factors
and triggers. Then we take a close look not only at the objectively
verifiable components and the anomalous ones, but also the physical,
physiological, feeling, psychological, and spiritual components. Because
of their importance, our main concern has become the aftereffects. If an
experience does not have any lasting effect on the experiencer, it remains
simply an anomaly, and so can be viewed objectively as a one-time
happening, now finished. However, some anomalous experiences become
personalized. They become part of the experiencer?s life. They have become
exceptional experiences (EEs). These, in turn, can initiate a process that
has ongoing transformative aftereffects. Then the experience becomes an
exceptional human experience (EHE). We are very interested in the process
by which EHEs develop and in observing how they affect the experiencer
both immediately and during the rest of his or her life. We are especially
interested in any patterns that may emerge across both individuals and
different types of experiences.
Some exceptional experiences are more likely to become transformative than
others, such as mystical experiences, near-death experiences, and
out-of-body experiences. But perhaps any anomalous experience can become
an EHE, and we are interested in discovering if this is the case. We have
drawn up the following very preliminary list of ten characteristics that
seem to hold across several types of exceptional human experience.
1. All of these experiences, including those induced by drugs or hypnosis,
occur spontaneously, at least initially. They happen to you?you can?t
make them happen.
2. Each type of experience in one way or another is an experience of
transcendence, which means ?to rise above; surpass; exceed.? In an
out-of-body experience, for example, you have the experience of literally
rising above your body, being able to look down upon it as if from outside.
In near-death and post-death experiences, you seem to transcend the
boundary between life and death. In clairvoyance and telepathy, you
transcend space (and in the latter case, also personality). In
precognition, you transcend time; and so it goes.
3. Each one represents a new experience of the self, of who or what we are.
Whereas we previously assumed we were bound by time, space, our bodies,
personalities, individualities, and certainly death, these experiences
give the lie to that view. They tell us we are more than we thought we
were.
4. They are all experiences of connection, first to different levels of
ourselves, but also to others, to other forms of life, to the planet, to
the universe, and to the sacred.
5. Each is an experience of opening to a reality we were taught could not
be true. This opening occurs directly. That is, we don?t have to think
about it or question it?during the experience we are there. They also open
us inwardly, thus predisposing us to have further experiences, unless we
shut down the process through fear or misunderstanding of what is
happening.
6. Although EHEs are experiences of opening, connecting, and transcending,
the fact that there is no sense of separation applies both within and
without the person. There is no separation felt between mind and body, so
that you respond with your whole self. This means there is often an
orgasmic element in EHEs. You are in a heightened state physiologically,
psychologically, and spiritually. Physically, you can experience tingling,
swooning, rapid heartbeat, flush, raised hairs, goosebumps, and
breathlessness. A good test of an EHE is that you can feel it in your toes.
7. Although there are scholars and scientists willing to grant that these
experiences merit investigation, they have done so using the methods of
Western science and analysis. This has led to their being treated as
static events--one-time occurrences that, once they are over, are
considered done with. For example, an investigator might look into a dream
that X had in May 1991 that corresponded in considerable detail to an
event that occurred in June 1991, thus indicating that the dream could
have been precognitive. The investigator tries to find witnesses to both
dream and event. He or she compares the details of the dream with the
details of the event, notes the person?s age, sex, occupation, education,
etc., and when finished, adds this information to other such statistics.
It will most likely molder away in a file somewhere. We haven?t learned
anything that connects to anything else. Instead, we should view such
experiences not as one-time events comparable, say to one?s first tooth or
car, but more to one?s job or one?s significant relationships--in other
words, to experiences that occur within an ongoing process. Exceptional
experiences are more like seeds. They happen to us not like events but as
initiators of a process, waiting to unfold in us even as the oak tree
unfolds from the acorn, but with a major difference--the oak tree, as far
as we know, grows spontaneously and naturally. But the process that
unfolds in a human being, at least after a certain stage is reached,
requires our conscious cooperation and participation. We need to pay
attention to these experiences, try to glimpse what they may be telling us,
discern where they may be leading us, trust the visions they reveal to us,
and incorporate them in our lives. So, although initially they occur
spontaneously, they are invitations to participate in a process of growth
that requires our cooperation. Instead, we tend to shelve these
experiences, to repress them, and not tell others about them, because
although they may be exciting, thrilling, wonderful experiences in
themselves, in the context of the consensus worldview they are weird,
strange, unreal, or even sick. In this view, it is natural not to look to
them for insight and guidance.
8. In science everyone is looking for a new paradigm (or worldview) to
account for everything. Physicists are trying to account for the
mind-matter interface. Psychologists and philosophers call it the
mind-body relationship. We call EHEs preparadigmatic experiences, because
they seem to herald a new paradigm, or at the least, they fly in the face
of the one with which we now live. So each one really offers the
experiencer (and to some extent, those who read or hear about a given
experience) a window with a new view, and they provide an opportunity to
choose between belief and doubt. (This is an opportunity of unparalleled
importance.) The experiencer must decide whether to provisionally trust
the experience or explain it away or dismiss it. Those who choose to
believe find they have opened a door leading to additional experiences
that provide entrance to a world where their lives become charged with
meaning. They have entered what we call the Experiential Paradigm. Those
who doubt continue to remain encased in the familiar inhospitable and even
abusive arms of the worldview that has been with us since the
Enlightenment, which we were taught was the only reality. Many people?s
lives are chaotic and bereft of meaning, and many turn to drugs, not to
embrace the world, but to forget it.
9. What we need is a story that will unite science and spirituality, self
and world. But first it must occur at the individual level, which brings
us to the ninth characteristic. Each of us needs a story that charges our
daily lives with meaning and puts us personally in touch with the sacred.
There are many books about writing, or better yet, living your own story,
your own myth. But the myths of old contained an element that is missing
from most stories told today, and that is a link with the sacred.
Exceptional human experiences can serve as those links; they are those
happenings in our lives that can pull us out of boredom and disconnection
and into a world of meaning and connection. We have to learn how to honor
these experiences and let them into our lives. When a sufficient number of
people do that, the larger story will emerge. Exceptional human
experiences catapult us into the new paradigm. We become a part of it and
we discover it is a part of us. When we enter the Experiential Paradigm,
we are no longer apart from it. The scientific method cannot take us there.
But once we ourselves are there, and when we are willing to take the
further leap of sharing our experiences with others, we will not only be
inside the new view that is needed to join physical and spiritual, mind
and matter, body and mind, but we will also be playing a significant part
in transforming it into consensus reality. Once more, as in ages past, the
story of each human will be the story of humankind, and vice versa. We and
our times will be in step and able to move forward as one. Science can do
nothing but follow, as it is right that it should.
10. Creating one?s story is not simply something the experiencer can do
alone. Telling it in part involves living it out in some way (i.e., acting
on it). So only does it really become real to the experiencer and to
others. One of the first ways to do this is to tell others about it, in a
context where it seems relevant, even though it may be embarrassing or
difficult. By sharing our EHEs, the other person validates the experience,
even if he or she reacts negatively. But often the response is positive,
and when it is, the other person may be moved by the first person?s story
to share his or her EHEs as well. This heightens the sense of meaning and
reality for both in ways that go beyond simply describing one?s EHEs. A
process seems to be initiated by such interchanges that operates
independently of both persons and that leads to connectedness and
interconnections. One has entered into the process of spinning the web of
the new paradigm. We don?t think it out; we live out of it and into a new
way of being in the world. Then we can conceptualize it in the same way
that we open our eyes and see.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Monday, November 25, 2019
TO DEAL OR NOT TO DEAL
TO DEAL OR NOT TO DEAL
The basic answer to the question stated below is yes, the being has
been dealing by not dealing. Auditing and two way comm gets the being
to spot the not dealing, and the mass and energy blows off, leaving him
able to deal again.
He didn't HAVE to shut it all out, he thought life would be better
doing so, factually he turned out wrong, life would have been better if
he had kept track of all his losses.
The preclear deals by not dealing.
The clear deals by dealing.
That said, the auditor has to have perfect TR's and ACKS, keep his
own case out of it, and really want the preclear to get better. The
auditor also has to be FAST, and be able to audit the preclear in front
of him, and not some watered down mockup that the auditor can can
confront, especially if the auditor thinks he is bigger than everyone
else in the world.
The auditor has to understand that his job is to dominate the
preclear's bank, not dominate the preclear.
The preclear is a communication relay point between the auditor and
the bank, the bank responds to the AUDITOR not to the preclear, who
merely hands the answer back to the auditor when the bank gives it to
him.
If the preclear is rumaging around in endless tar, chaos and
madness to find an answer to the question, the preclear is BEING a
bank, and the real bank is sitting there drinking whiskey and
rye waiting for the auditor to recognize it as the one with the answers.
THE BANK doesn't have a hard time coming up with answers if the
commands are directed to it subject.
FINDING the right subject is where you get to find out if the
auditor is talking TO the preclear, which is a dead end, or THROUGH the
preclear to the BANK.
The preclear doesn't know and doesn't have any BANK answers, only
the BANK has bank answers, so talk to the bank and not the preclear.
TR's are used to talk to the preclear when the preclear is no longer
acting as a relay to the bank.
The auditor must also understand that you can't help a preclear
with his mother by talking about your own mother :) The one who asks the
question or gives the commands is the auditor, the one who looks and
answers is the preclear.
A preclear looking for help in the form of advice or consultation
will start to ask questions of the auditor making the auditor the
preclear.
Preclear's will pay endlessly for this.
Remember the auditor knows everything about the preclear's case IN
GENERAL, but not in specific. The preclear knows everything about his
case in SPECIFIC (under the not-is), but not the general, for which he
needs training and indoc.
Thus the auditor is a councilor and not a consultant who knows more
about the preclear than the preclear does in specific.
If the auditor is a screwball escapee from cramming, his commands
will not direct the bank and the fileclerk mechanism will hand out
ridicule of the auditor or misdirection of the session to the preclear.
So yes two way comm between auditor and preclear, with the auditor
in control can help the preclear get answers out of his recalcitrant
bank. However preclear's are TERRIFIED of exceeding the auditor's
reality and acceptance levels.
Yes preclear's will get into heavy dub-in and delusion before the
incidents start to go actual on him, but if he running actual and the
auditor is thinking its all dub-in and delusion, the auditor won't allow
the preclear to end the run, because you can't end a run of delusion, it
never ends.
If the auditor is a 'we never went to the moon' case, and can't
muster any altitude with the preclear, whether real or imagined,
auditing won't happen, F/N's will be small above 3.0 and TA will be
nonexistent except TA resulting from the preclear holding an internal
dialog with himself and probably a committee of 20 BT's about why he is
getting auditing from this guy in the first place.
Preclear's will do hours of that too, him and his BT friends
passing around that bottle of whiskey and rye with his bank all the
while the auditor is beaming 'Wow look at this guy and all the TA he is
making...'
Homer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
lamoore0777@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>#1. Do you believe, (either owing to your first hand experience, or
>owing to the theoritical soundness of the idea) that *merely allowing
>another human being to recount their personal experiences in life (in
>your presence*) is useful to that human being's fundamental well being
>as well as their ultimate psychological/spiritual growth? (in the
>presence of the absence of judgement of the beholder, called the
>auditor, or as the case may be, called you.)
The issue is based on what the being did during the original
incident.
Hubbard said he made a facsimile and later used it to recreate the
conditions of the incident in order to elicit sympathy or fend off
contra survival forces and intentions in the environment or other people.
Adore says the being handled the original incident with not-isness
and postulates about the benefit of limitations and is in fact, still
there in the past, not just stuck in a facsimile in the past.
The intent of auditing is to get the being to reevaluate his
postulates which may have been a good idea at the time, but probably no
longer serve him in the present game.
Notice this is very different than coming to terms with the loss
NOW. Its not enough to accept now what happened and what you did in the
incident. One has to figure out what one should have done in the first
place back then knowing what you did then!
That's a much bigger order.
Used to be we could pretend to be crippled so the recruiting forces
would leave us alone, and then undo it every evening when we went to bed
at night.
Then one day the recruits raid us during the night and find out we
aren't crippled at all, and so it became useful to be crippled all the
time just in case.
Thus one is stuck on old postulates of the advantage of being
disadvantaged.
Have you looked at a local meatball recently? Sheesh.
So we want the being to go back to the past and reevaluate some of
those postulates so that he can rewrite the incident rather than throw a
lot of force at it and duck it like it never existed.
Rewriting the incident to a satisfactory 'what he should have done
then', will not rewrite physical universe history but will rewrite his
personal state as if he had actually done the right thing at the time.
Mostly eschew the flinch and cringe.
This is pure magic, unbelievable until it is experienced.
On top of that the being gets back all the enturbulated theta he
used to cement the not-is in the place and all the ensuing nonsense that
happened later because of his non confront.
So he gets back all this energy he packed away into black tar,
obsidian and crazy glue and he gets to be as if it never happened in the
first place. Quite a deal for a few hours of properly done auditing.
Homer
Thu Jan 5 00:05:10 EST 2006
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
The basic answer to the question stated below is yes, the being has
been dealing by not dealing. Auditing and two way comm gets the being
to spot the not dealing, and the mass and energy blows off, leaving him
able to deal again.
He didn't HAVE to shut it all out, he thought life would be better
doing so, factually he turned out wrong, life would have been better if
he had kept track of all his losses.
The preclear deals by not dealing.
The clear deals by dealing.
That said, the auditor has to have perfect TR's and ACKS, keep his
own case out of it, and really want the preclear to get better. The
auditor also has to be FAST, and be able to audit the preclear in front
of him, and not some watered down mockup that the auditor can can
confront, especially if the auditor thinks he is bigger than everyone
else in the world.
The auditor has to understand that his job is to dominate the
preclear's bank, not dominate the preclear.
The preclear is a communication relay point between the auditor and
the bank, the bank responds to the AUDITOR not to the preclear, who
merely hands the answer back to the auditor when the bank gives it to
him.
If the preclear is rumaging around in endless tar, chaos and
madness to find an answer to the question, the preclear is BEING a
bank, and the real bank is sitting there drinking whiskey and
rye waiting for the auditor to recognize it as the one with the answers.
THE BANK doesn't have a hard time coming up with answers if the
commands are directed to it subject.
FINDING the right subject is where you get to find out if the
auditor is talking TO the preclear, which is a dead end, or THROUGH the
preclear to the BANK.
The preclear doesn't know and doesn't have any BANK answers, only
the BANK has bank answers, so talk to the bank and not the preclear.
TR's are used to talk to the preclear when the preclear is no longer
acting as a relay to the bank.
The auditor must also understand that you can't help a preclear
with his mother by talking about your own mother :) The one who asks the
question or gives the commands is the auditor, the one who looks and
answers is the preclear.
A preclear looking for help in the form of advice or consultation
will start to ask questions of the auditor making the auditor the
preclear.
Preclear's will pay endlessly for this.
Remember the auditor knows everything about the preclear's case IN
GENERAL, but not in specific. The preclear knows everything about his
case in SPECIFIC (under the not-is), but not the general, for which he
needs training and indoc.
Thus the auditor is a councilor and not a consultant who knows more
about the preclear than the preclear does in specific.
If the auditor is a screwball escapee from cramming, his commands
will not direct the bank and the fileclerk mechanism will hand out
ridicule of the auditor or misdirection of the session to the preclear.
So yes two way comm between auditor and preclear, with the auditor
in control can help the preclear get answers out of his recalcitrant
bank. However preclear's are TERRIFIED of exceeding the auditor's
reality and acceptance levels.
Yes preclear's will get into heavy dub-in and delusion before the
incidents start to go actual on him, but if he running actual and the
auditor is thinking its all dub-in and delusion, the auditor won't allow
the preclear to end the run, because you can't end a run of delusion, it
never ends.
If the auditor is a 'we never went to the moon' case, and can't
muster any altitude with the preclear, whether real or imagined,
auditing won't happen, F/N's will be small above 3.0 and TA will be
nonexistent except TA resulting from the preclear holding an internal
dialog with himself and probably a committee of 20 BT's about why he is
getting auditing from this guy in the first place.
Preclear's will do hours of that too, him and his BT friends
passing around that bottle of whiskey and rye with his bank all the
while the auditor is beaming 'Wow look at this guy and all the TA he is
making...'
Homer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
lamoore0777@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>#1. Do you believe, (either owing to your first hand experience, or
>owing to the theoritical soundness of the idea) that *merely allowing
>another human being to recount their personal experiences in life (in
>your presence*) is useful to that human being's fundamental well being
>as well as their ultimate psychological/spiritual growth? (in the
>presence of the absence of judgement of the beholder, called the
>auditor, or as the case may be, called you.)
The issue is based on what the being did during the original
incident.
Hubbard said he made a facsimile and later used it to recreate the
conditions of the incident in order to elicit sympathy or fend off
contra survival forces and intentions in the environment or other people.
Adore says the being handled the original incident with not-isness
and postulates about the benefit of limitations and is in fact, still
there in the past, not just stuck in a facsimile in the past.
The intent of auditing is to get the being to reevaluate his
postulates which may have been a good idea at the time, but probably no
longer serve him in the present game.
Notice this is very different than coming to terms with the loss
NOW. Its not enough to accept now what happened and what you did in the
incident. One has to figure out what one should have done in the first
place back then knowing what you did then!
That's a much bigger order.
Used to be we could pretend to be crippled so the recruiting forces
would leave us alone, and then undo it every evening when we went to bed
at night.
Then one day the recruits raid us during the night and find out we
aren't crippled at all, and so it became useful to be crippled all the
time just in case.
Thus one is stuck on old postulates of the advantage of being
disadvantaged.
Have you looked at a local meatball recently? Sheesh.
So we want the being to go back to the past and reevaluate some of
those postulates so that he can rewrite the incident rather than throw a
lot of force at it and duck it like it never existed.
Rewriting the incident to a satisfactory 'what he should have done
then', will not rewrite physical universe history but will rewrite his
personal state as if he had actually done the right thing at the time.
Mostly eschew the flinch and cringe.
This is pure magic, unbelievable until it is experienced.
On top of that the being gets back all the enturbulated theta he
used to cement the not-is in the place and all the ensuing nonsense that
happened later because of his non confront.
So he gets back all this energy he packed away into black tar,
obsidian and crazy glue and he gets to be as if it never happened in the
first place. Quite a deal for a few hours of properly done auditing.
Homer
Thu Jan 5 00:05:10 EST 2006
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Saturday, November 23, 2019
ABUSE - Alan Walter
From: ACW
As I stated in earlier data, there are many missing technologies in
Scientology.
This piece of missing technology is possibly "WHY" Scientology
became so ABUSIVE.
It never had the technology to handle the area of ABUSE, thus it
by-passed the area, and began to dramatize it.
Added to that Scientologists as a group because of the mutuality of
unhandled Episodes of Abuse it has become "an act of tacit sabotage."
A Scientologist thinks their behaviour is NORMAL.
The society is appalled. We are appalled.
An ABUSIVE ACT is: GIVING someone something they do NOT WANT.
An ABUSE is: GETTING something you do NOT WANT.
ABUSE HANDLING - - -A VITAL MISSING TECHNOLOGY
ABUSE is the ultimate NEGATIVE PROCESS of life.
Abuse Episode Handling - - Harmony and Ability Restoration
Procedures
The ability to handle an ABUSE EPISODE is a major technical
discovery.
The reason ABUSE EPISODES have never been properly handled by any
past technologies is, they were engaged in their own forms of ABUSE.
ABUSIVE PRACTITIONERS cannot be expected to handle what they are
enforcing. The practitioner and the practice become part of an on-going
ABUSE EPISODE themselves.
The common denominator of ALL ABUSE is:
AN ALTERED, FALSE OR WRONG ITEM, OBJECT OR NOT WANT IS ENFORCED
INTO THE SPACE AND TIME OF A WANTED ITEM, OBJECT OR WANT.=20
When an altered, false or wrong item, object or not want occupies a
space or time it prevents the wanted item, object or want from arriving
in that space and time.
This creates unsolvable problems and disasters.
ABUSE destroys your ability to have in that area.
ABUSE destroys your ability to control or be the master of your own
space.
ABUSE destroys your ability to control or be the master of your own
time.
ABUSE destroys your ability to control or be the master of your own
energy.
ABUSE destroys your ability to control or be the master of your own
objects.
ABUSE can create you into being and acting in opposition to your
own deep seated true WANTS and DREAMS.
ABUSIVE GAMES are DESTRUCTIVE GAMES, that require DESTRUCTIVE
NEGATIVE PROCESSES TO IMPLEMENT.
The indicators, outcomes and products of ABUSE are:
DOESN'T WANT PROCESSING
DOESN'T WANT TRAINING
PROCESSING RELUCTANCE, PUTS OFF, OR CREATES PROBLEMS WITH TIME AND
MONEY.
TRAINING RELUCTANCE, PUTS OFF, OR CREATES PROBLEMS WITH TIME AND
MONEY.
NO PROCESSING
NO TRAINING
SUBJECT ILLITERATE
PROSPERITY ILLITERATE
SUCCESS ILLITERATE
HAPPINESS ILLITERATE
LOSER
CONSTANTLY VICTIMIZED
CO-DEPENDENT
CONSTANT MONEY PROBLEMS
WORKING AT SOMETHING YOU DON'T WANT TO DO
CHRONIC LOW MOOD LEVEL
POVERTY
FAILURE
UNHAPPINESS
LOW SELF ESTEEM
FEELING UNWORTHY
BAD TEMPERED
ATTENTION AND THOUGHTS FIXATED ON PAST
CONSTANT DESTRUCTIVE THOUGHTS TOWARDS A GROUP OR INDIVIDUAL
HATRED OF AUTHORITY
HATRED OF RULES
ABSENCE OF GOALS
CHRONIC TIREDNESS
CHRONIC LETHARGY
IMMOBILIZED
ABANDONED DREAMS AND ASPIRATIONS
NO TRUST
SUICIDAL
ACCIDENT PRONE
ILLNESS PRONE
CHRONICALLY UNLUCKY IN LIFE, CAREER AND RELATIONSHIPS
INVESTMENT LOSSES
SAD
NO INTEREST
NO SPACE
NO TIME
NO MONEY
Anyone of these outcomes, indicators or products is, an indication
of AN AREA OR A SERIES OF AREAS OF ABUSE.
ABUSE ERADICATION - - HARMONY RESTORATION PROCEDURES
ABUSE is a "done to you" victim process, it has come into being
because you placed yourself in that position. WHY YOU PLACED YOURSELF
IN THAT POSITION is the answer to the CHRONIC ADDICTION to ABUSE.
To get to that answer you must unburden and remove ALL the altered,
false and wrong items, objects and not wants that are occupying yours or
the clients space and time.
YOU MUST REMOVE ALL ALTERED, FALSE OR WRONG ITEMS, OBJECTS OR
UNWANTED WANTS FROM THE CASE. To achieve this follow these steps.
STEP ONE: SUBJECT LITERACY (You can do this solo or on a client, I
will lay out the steps to be applied to a client.)
1. Have client read the list of ABUSE outcomes, indicators or
products.
2. Make a list of those which apply to the client, ask:
a. What of these items applies to your life at this time? (A new
or highly charged client will probably answer all of them.
b. Ask the client to number the items chosen by orders of urgency
or interest.
c. Ask: Are there any other areas of ABUSE that you have thought
of as you were inspecting this list?
d. Write down any added areas of ABUSE.
STEP TWO: NARROWING THE TARGET
1. Ask: Is your attention stuck on any person or group connected
to these areas of ABUSE? If yes.
2. Ask: Name the person or group.
3. Tell me about him/her/them?
(You have now arrived at the most critical point of the handling.)
4. Is your client the ABUSED or the ABUSER?
You now have to work out using these indicators:
Constantly critical. (A criticalness is an opposition against.)
An abuser is someone who is opposed to producing statistics.
Opposed to management.
Opposed to seniors.
Critical. This denotes distance from, lies, non-permeation and
counter= forces.
Not delivering what was promised.
Keeping an area small.
Attacking and critical of, the who or what their survival depends
upon.
Critical. This places you in the low Yellow or Red Zone area.
Poor processing abilities.
Poor training skills.
Constantly does the unimportant actions, while leaving the
important actions up to someone else.
Chronic low mood level.
Critical. This indicates an area of ABUSE being engaged in by the
critic.
THE ABUSED ARE ALWAYS ABUSERS!!!
They constantly dramatize altered, false and wrong items, objects
and produce unwanted wants. Thus you must be very careful to run exact
moments of ABUSE.
An ABUSER is always insisting on their rightness, at the cost of
ignoring the TRUTH.
An ABUSER will turn the session into a form of ABUSE if you are not
careful.=
An ABUSER is a chronic liar. They are experts at selective
perception and misdirection.
Example: The client states: My boss treats me as a second class
citizen, the other day he threw me on the floor and kicked me.
You are appalled. Don't be. Ask: What was going on just before he
became so enraged? What did you do? or What didn't you do?
Demonstrations of violence requires a long period of insidious
abuse. ABUSERS employ constant goading and needling tactics to
undermine and infuriate their imagined enemies.
It is not your job to pass sentence on who is wrong or right! The
ABUSER is trying to recruit you for their side. You are to find the
whole truth of why and how the ABUSE came into existence and how to
handle it so it does not repeat.
Your processing and life targets are to replace ABUSE with HARMONY.
THERE IS NOTHING RIGHT ABOUT ABUSE OR BEING INVOLVED IN AN ABUSIVE
GAME.
Yes I realize many of you have lived very ABUSIVE lives, but there
is no reason why you should continue to do so. That was the past. Life
is in you today, and you are creating your tomorrow's. Create those
tomorrows with kindness, love, harmony, deliver what you promised, and
your futures will be beyond your wildest dreams.
The fact that anyone is engaged in ANY form of ABUSE is an
indication they are on a SELF DESTRUCTIVE PATH.
To maintain a chronic low mood level requires a huge quantity of
lies, false beliefs, harmful acts, hidden agendas, evil intentions,
wrong answers and a refusal to be responsible for their causative
actions.
To maintain and add to the continuing low mood level the Being MUST
keep themselves in ABUSIVE EPISODES of existence.
To be stable in the area of ABUSE HANDLING requires the ability to
not play. You must be able to spot ABUSE and walk away from it, if you
find yourself in a violent relationship, you must walk away until
HARMONY is restored. This will require that both you and the ABUSER
will be fully role educated on ABUSE handling technology, including
having eliminated the majority of your ABUSE EPISODES.
People who cannot walk away from ABUSIVE SITUATIONS are addicted to
ABUSE, consequently they must create ABUSIVE SITUATIONS and EPISODES,
being magnetically and obsessively attracted towards ABUSIVE PEOPLE.
They are obsessively into destructively doing the other person in.
4. Your client is an ABUSER.
You must realize there is an earlier area of ABUSE.
The most deadly are the alcoholic parent, the religious fanatic,
the therapist or psychologist, the disciplinarian, the overbearing
parent. Another deadly area is the cult ABUSE. Any one of these means
your client has received years of constant chronic life ABUSE.
To your client ABUSE is how a normal life is supposed to be.
That is WHY the client constantly needles and baits their seniors
by never delivering what they promised, saying one thing and doing
something else. They NEED and WANT their seniors to ABUSE THEM.
The senior is an idiot if they do. The senior must separate itself
from the ABUSER.
ABUSERS need a lot of role education and help, but don't expect any
appreciation, for they cannot experience true help as they see you as
the= enemy.
The ABUSER will try to SELL you on their rightness. DON'T BUY IT!
Just set about unburdening and role educating your client. The
worlds of kindness, love, friendliness, success, genuine help, constant
high mood levels, wins and worthiness are alien planets and subjects to
the ABUSERS.
STEP THREE: THE NAMING OF THE OPPONENT (ABUSER)
When you find who the client believes to be the ABUSER, you have
found someone who is the clients real or imagined ENEMY.
ABUSERS believe almost everyone is their ENEMY. That is why they
are so unfriendly! It is also why life is so difficult for them. They
are working against the flow of life. They are trying to stop and kill
everything. Their reward is to be stopped and operate in a chronic mood
level of spiritual death.
Being around someone who is in this state is very soul destroying,
and takes all the pleasure out of living life.
1. Ask the client to name the ABUSER.
2. Assess by using the prefix:
Connected to ( named abuser) has there been an altered, false or
wrong.........
a. answer?
b. who?
c. what?
d. where?
e. when?
f. how?
g. why?
h. mood level?
i. perception?
j. conclusion?
k. want?
l. position taken?
m. image created?
n. image projected?
o. intention?
p. plan?
q. implementation?
r. command phrase?
s. fact?
t. item?
u. object?
v. outcome?
w. state invalidated?
x. some thing else?
3. Handle each reading command in the following manner.
3a. Tell me about it?
3b. When was that?
3c. Where was that?
3d. Can you holographically describe the space, the moods, the
interactions duplicating exactly the moods and impacts?
3e. What happened?
3f. Did you make any self determined decisions at that time?
3g. What was the decision(s)? There may be several decisions,
just note each one and run 3h. on each.
3h. What have been the consequences of that (named decision)?
Repeat these processes over and over on each reading command until
there is a complete change of attitude towards the enemy.
Your clients mood level should be rising as the lies, wrong items,
alterations, false and wrongnesses are eliminated. If this doesn't
occur or the client is still opposed to the named abuser, you have an
earlier ABUSER who this ABUSER IS REMINDING THEM OF.
If the client originates this, cease assessing and handling the
present ABUSER and substitute the earlier reminded ABUSER.
STEP THREE, A: RESPONSIBILITY AND CAUSE OVER ABUSE ACTIVITIES.
3A. After you have repeatedly assessed the above full list and no
more questions are reading, you can now upgrade the client to a more
causative series of processes.
3Aa. Run:
3Aa1. Have you ever deliberately needled (named abuser) into
getting upset?
2. Have you ever deliberately goaded (named abuser) into attacking
you?
Have you ever altered, falsified or given (named abuser) a
wrong......
a. answer?
b. who?
c. what?
d. where?
e. when?
f. how?
g. why?
h. mood level?
i. perception?
j. conclusion?
k. want?
l. position taken?
m. image created?
n. image projected?
o. intention?
p. plan?
q. implementation?
r. command phrase?
s. fact?
t. item?
u. object?
v. outcome?
w. state invalidated?
x. some thing else?
STEP FOUR: FREEDOM FROM LONG TERM PROBLEMS AND TRAPS.
4a. Run:
4pa. What problem has (named abuser) given you?
4pb. How have you handled that problem?
4pc. What have been the consequences of that?
4pd. What problem have you given (named abuser)?
4pe. How did they handle that problem?
4pf. What have been the consequences of that?
4pg. Because of you what problem has (named abuser) given to
itself?
4ph. How did they handle that problem?
4pi. What have been the consequences of that?
4pj. Because of (named abuser) what problem have you given to
yourself?
4pk. How did you handle that problem?
4pl. What have been the consequences of that?
Causative Processes Step:
4a. What has (named Abuser) done to you?
4b. What have you done to (named abuser)?
4c. What has _______________ restrained about you?
4d. What have you restrained about______________?
4e. What has________________ not communicated to you?
4f. What have you not communicated to ______________?
4g. Because of you what has_________done to themselves?
4h. Because of___________what have you done to yourself?
4i. Because of you what has_______restrained about themselves?
4j. Because of_______what have you restrained about yourself?
The client should experience several cognition's (aha's) about the=
stupid destructive games they have been playing.
STEP FIVE: AVOIDANCE OF RESPONSIBILITY AND INTEGRITY.
5. Ask: By being involved in the conflicts and upsets with (named
abuser) what didn't you have to face up to or be responsible for?
5a. Tell me about that?
5b. Run:
What part of (area or subject avoided) are you willing to permeate?
5c. What part would you rather not permeate?
5d. What have been the consequences of not facing up to (area or
subject avoided)?
STEP SIX: HANDLE ALL ABUSERS AND ABUSE IN THE SAME MANNER.
Repeat step three to five on each ABUSER.
This is a long process but well worth while, if done properly your
client will experience a continuous high Green Zone phenomena of being
in the right place at the right time.
PROSPERITY, SUCCESS AND HAPPINESS IN LIFE, RELATIONSHIPS, BUSINESS
AND CAREERS WILL BECOME THE NORM!!
ALAN C. WALTER
26 June 1996
Copyright (C) 1996 Alan C. Walter
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
As I stated in earlier data, there are many missing technologies in
Scientology.
This piece of missing technology is possibly "WHY" Scientology
became so ABUSIVE.
It never had the technology to handle the area of ABUSE, thus it
by-passed the area, and began to dramatize it.
Added to that Scientologists as a group because of the mutuality of
unhandled Episodes of Abuse it has become "an act of tacit sabotage."
A Scientologist thinks their behaviour is NORMAL.
The society is appalled. We are appalled.
An ABUSIVE ACT is: GIVING someone something they do NOT WANT.
An ABUSE is: GETTING something you do NOT WANT.
ABUSE HANDLING - - -A VITAL MISSING TECHNOLOGY
ABUSE is the ultimate NEGATIVE PROCESS of life.
Abuse Episode Handling - - Harmony and Ability Restoration
Procedures
The ability to handle an ABUSE EPISODE is a major technical
discovery.
The reason ABUSE EPISODES have never been properly handled by any
past technologies is, they were engaged in their own forms of ABUSE.
ABUSIVE PRACTITIONERS cannot be expected to handle what they are
enforcing. The practitioner and the practice become part of an on-going
ABUSE EPISODE themselves.
The common denominator of ALL ABUSE is:
AN ALTERED, FALSE OR WRONG ITEM, OBJECT OR NOT WANT IS ENFORCED
INTO THE SPACE AND TIME OF A WANTED ITEM, OBJECT OR WANT.=20
When an altered, false or wrong item, object or not want occupies a
space or time it prevents the wanted item, object or want from arriving
in that space and time.
This creates unsolvable problems and disasters.
ABUSE destroys your ability to have in that area.
ABUSE destroys your ability to control or be the master of your own
space.
ABUSE destroys your ability to control or be the master of your own
time.
ABUSE destroys your ability to control or be the master of your own
energy.
ABUSE destroys your ability to control or be the master of your own
objects.
ABUSE can create you into being and acting in opposition to your
own deep seated true WANTS and DREAMS.
ABUSIVE GAMES are DESTRUCTIVE GAMES, that require DESTRUCTIVE
NEGATIVE PROCESSES TO IMPLEMENT.
The indicators, outcomes and products of ABUSE are:
DOESN'T WANT PROCESSING
DOESN'T WANT TRAINING
PROCESSING RELUCTANCE, PUTS OFF, OR CREATES PROBLEMS WITH TIME AND
MONEY.
TRAINING RELUCTANCE, PUTS OFF, OR CREATES PROBLEMS WITH TIME AND
MONEY.
NO PROCESSING
NO TRAINING
SUBJECT ILLITERATE
PROSPERITY ILLITERATE
SUCCESS ILLITERATE
HAPPINESS ILLITERATE
LOSER
CONSTANTLY VICTIMIZED
CO-DEPENDENT
CONSTANT MONEY PROBLEMS
WORKING AT SOMETHING YOU DON'T WANT TO DO
CHRONIC LOW MOOD LEVEL
POVERTY
FAILURE
UNHAPPINESS
LOW SELF ESTEEM
FEELING UNWORTHY
BAD TEMPERED
ATTENTION AND THOUGHTS FIXATED ON PAST
CONSTANT DESTRUCTIVE THOUGHTS TOWARDS A GROUP OR INDIVIDUAL
HATRED OF AUTHORITY
HATRED OF RULES
ABSENCE OF GOALS
CHRONIC TIREDNESS
CHRONIC LETHARGY
IMMOBILIZED
ABANDONED DREAMS AND ASPIRATIONS
NO TRUST
SUICIDAL
ACCIDENT PRONE
ILLNESS PRONE
CHRONICALLY UNLUCKY IN LIFE, CAREER AND RELATIONSHIPS
INVESTMENT LOSSES
SAD
NO INTEREST
NO SPACE
NO TIME
NO MONEY
Anyone of these outcomes, indicators or products is, an indication
of AN AREA OR A SERIES OF AREAS OF ABUSE.
ABUSE ERADICATION - - HARMONY RESTORATION PROCEDURES
ABUSE is a "done to you" victim process, it has come into being
because you placed yourself in that position. WHY YOU PLACED YOURSELF
IN THAT POSITION is the answer to the CHRONIC ADDICTION to ABUSE.
To get to that answer you must unburden and remove ALL the altered,
false and wrong items, objects and not wants that are occupying yours or
the clients space and time.
YOU MUST REMOVE ALL ALTERED, FALSE OR WRONG ITEMS, OBJECTS OR
UNWANTED WANTS FROM THE CASE. To achieve this follow these steps.
STEP ONE: SUBJECT LITERACY (You can do this solo or on a client, I
will lay out the steps to be applied to a client.)
1. Have client read the list of ABUSE outcomes, indicators or
products.
2. Make a list of those which apply to the client, ask:
a. What of these items applies to your life at this time? (A new
or highly charged client will probably answer all of them.
b. Ask the client to number the items chosen by orders of urgency
or interest.
c. Ask: Are there any other areas of ABUSE that you have thought
of as you were inspecting this list?
d. Write down any added areas of ABUSE.
STEP TWO: NARROWING THE TARGET
1. Ask: Is your attention stuck on any person or group connected
to these areas of ABUSE? If yes.
2. Ask: Name the person or group.
3. Tell me about him/her/them?
(You have now arrived at the most critical point of the handling.)
4. Is your client the ABUSED or the ABUSER?
You now have to work out using these indicators:
Constantly critical. (A criticalness is an opposition against.)
An abuser is someone who is opposed to producing statistics.
Opposed to management.
Opposed to seniors.
Critical. This denotes distance from, lies, non-permeation and
counter= forces.
Not delivering what was promised.
Keeping an area small.
Attacking and critical of, the who or what their survival depends
upon.
Critical. This places you in the low Yellow or Red Zone area.
Poor processing abilities.
Poor training skills.
Constantly does the unimportant actions, while leaving the
important actions up to someone else.
Chronic low mood level.
Critical. This indicates an area of ABUSE being engaged in by the
critic.
THE ABUSED ARE ALWAYS ABUSERS!!!
They constantly dramatize altered, false and wrong items, objects
and produce unwanted wants. Thus you must be very careful to run exact
moments of ABUSE.
An ABUSER is always insisting on their rightness, at the cost of
ignoring the TRUTH.
An ABUSER will turn the session into a form of ABUSE if you are not
careful.=
An ABUSER is a chronic liar. They are experts at selective
perception and misdirection.
Example: The client states: My boss treats me as a second class
citizen, the other day he threw me on the floor and kicked me.
You are appalled. Don't be. Ask: What was going on just before he
became so enraged? What did you do? or What didn't you do?
Demonstrations of violence requires a long period of insidious
abuse. ABUSERS employ constant goading and needling tactics to
undermine and infuriate their imagined enemies.
It is not your job to pass sentence on who is wrong or right! The
ABUSER is trying to recruit you for their side. You are to find the
whole truth of why and how the ABUSE came into existence and how to
handle it so it does not repeat.
Your processing and life targets are to replace ABUSE with HARMONY.
THERE IS NOTHING RIGHT ABOUT ABUSE OR BEING INVOLVED IN AN ABUSIVE
GAME.
Yes I realize many of you have lived very ABUSIVE lives, but there
is no reason why you should continue to do so. That was the past. Life
is in you today, and you are creating your tomorrow's. Create those
tomorrows with kindness, love, harmony, deliver what you promised, and
your futures will be beyond your wildest dreams.
The fact that anyone is engaged in ANY form of ABUSE is an
indication they are on a SELF DESTRUCTIVE PATH.
To maintain a chronic low mood level requires a huge quantity of
lies, false beliefs, harmful acts, hidden agendas, evil intentions,
wrong answers and a refusal to be responsible for their causative
actions.
To maintain and add to the continuing low mood level the Being MUST
keep themselves in ABUSIVE EPISODES of existence.
To be stable in the area of ABUSE HANDLING requires the ability to
not play. You must be able to spot ABUSE and walk away from it, if you
find yourself in a violent relationship, you must walk away until
HARMONY is restored. This will require that both you and the ABUSER
will be fully role educated on ABUSE handling technology, including
having eliminated the majority of your ABUSE EPISODES.
People who cannot walk away from ABUSIVE SITUATIONS are addicted to
ABUSE, consequently they must create ABUSIVE SITUATIONS and EPISODES,
being magnetically and obsessively attracted towards ABUSIVE PEOPLE.
They are obsessively into destructively doing the other person in.
4. Your client is an ABUSER.
You must realize there is an earlier area of ABUSE.
The most deadly are the alcoholic parent, the religious fanatic,
the therapist or psychologist, the disciplinarian, the overbearing
parent. Another deadly area is the cult ABUSE. Any one of these means
your client has received years of constant chronic life ABUSE.
To your client ABUSE is how a normal life is supposed to be.
That is WHY the client constantly needles and baits their seniors
by never delivering what they promised, saying one thing and doing
something else. They NEED and WANT their seniors to ABUSE THEM.
The senior is an idiot if they do. The senior must separate itself
from the ABUSER.
ABUSERS need a lot of role education and help, but don't expect any
appreciation, for they cannot experience true help as they see you as
the= enemy.
The ABUSER will try to SELL you on their rightness. DON'T BUY IT!
Just set about unburdening and role educating your client. The
worlds of kindness, love, friendliness, success, genuine help, constant
high mood levels, wins and worthiness are alien planets and subjects to
the ABUSERS.
STEP THREE: THE NAMING OF THE OPPONENT (ABUSER)
When you find who the client believes to be the ABUSER, you have
found someone who is the clients real or imagined ENEMY.
ABUSERS believe almost everyone is their ENEMY. That is why they
are so unfriendly! It is also why life is so difficult for them. They
are working against the flow of life. They are trying to stop and kill
everything. Their reward is to be stopped and operate in a chronic mood
level of spiritual death.
Being around someone who is in this state is very soul destroying,
and takes all the pleasure out of living life.
1. Ask the client to name the ABUSER.
2. Assess by using the prefix:
Connected to ( named abuser) has there been an altered, false or
wrong.........
a. answer?
b. who?
c. what?
d. where?
e. when?
f. how?
g. why?
h. mood level?
i. perception?
j. conclusion?
k. want?
l. position taken?
m. image created?
n. image projected?
o. intention?
p. plan?
q. implementation?
r. command phrase?
s. fact?
t. item?
u. object?
v. outcome?
w. state invalidated?
x. some thing else?
3. Handle each reading command in the following manner.
3a. Tell me about it?
3b. When was that?
3c. Where was that?
3d. Can you holographically describe the space, the moods, the
interactions duplicating exactly the moods and impacts?
3e. What happened?
3f. Did you make any self determined decisions at that time?
3g. What was the decision(s)? There may be several decisions,
just note each one and run 3h. on each.
3h. What have been the consequences of that (named decision)?
Repeat these processes over and over on each reading command until
there is a complete change of attitude towards the enemy.
Your clients mood level should be rising as the lies, wrong items,
alterations, false and wrongnesses are eliminated. If this doesn't
occur or the client is still opposed to the named abuser, you have an
earlier ABUSER who this ABUSER IS REMINDING THEM OF.
If the client originates this, cease assessing and handling the
present ABUSER and substitute the earlier reminded ABUSER.
STEP THREE, A: RESPONSIBILITY AND CAUSE OVER ABUSE ACTIVITIES.
3A. After you have repeatedly assessed the above full list and no
more questions are reading, you can now upgrade the client to a more
causative series of processes.
3Aa. Run:
3Aa1. Have you ever deliberately needled (named abuser) into
getting upset?
2. Have you ever deliberately goaded (named abuser) into attacking
you?
Have you ever altered, falsified or given (named abuser) a
wrong......
a. answer?
b. who?
c. what?
d. where?
e. when?
f. how?
g. why?
h. mood level?
i. perception?
j. conclusion?
k. want?
l. position taken?
m. image created?
n. image projected?
o. intention?
p. plan?
q. implementation?
r. command phrase?
s. fact?
t. item?
u. object?
v. outcome?
w. state invalidated?
x. some thing else?
STEP FOUR: FREEDOM FROM LONG TERM PROBLEMS AND TRAPS.
4a. Run:
4pa. What problem has (named abuser) given you?
4pb. How have you handled that problem?
4pc. What have been the consequences of that?
4pd. What problem have you given (named abuser)?
4pe. How did they handle that problem?
4pf. What have been the consequences of that?
4pg. Because of you what problem has (named abuser) given to
itself?
4ph. How did they handle that problem?
4pi. What have been the consequences of that?
4pj. Because of (named abuser) what problem have you given to
yourself?
4pk. How did you handle that problem?
4pl. What have been the consequences of that?
Causative Processes Step:
4a. What has (named Abuser) done to you?
4b. What have you done to (named abuser)?
4c. What has _______________ restrained about you?
4d. What have you restrained about______________?
4e. What has________________ not communicated to you?
4f. What have you not communicated to ______________?
4g. Because of you what has_________done to themselves?
4h. Because of___________what have you done to yourself?
4i. Because of you what has_______restrained about themselves?
4j. Because of_______what have you restrained about yourself?
The client should experience several cognition's (aha's) about the=
stupid destructive games they have been playing.
STEP FIVE: AVOIDANCE OF RESPONSIBILITY AND INTEGRITY.
5. Ask: By being involved in the conflicts and upsets with (named
abuser) what didn't you have to face up to or be responsible for?
5a. Tell me about that?
5b. Run:
What part of (area or subject avoided) are you willing to permeate?
5c. What part would you rather not permeate?
5d. What have been the consequences of not facing up to (area or
subject avoided)?
STEP SIX: HANDLE ALL ABUSERS AND ABUSE IN THE SAME MANNER.
Repeat step three to five on each ABUSER.
This is a long process but well worth while, if done properly your
client will experience a continuous high Green Zone phenomena of being
in the right place at the right time.
PROSPERITY, SUCCESS AND HAPPINESS IN LIFE, RELATIONSHIPS, BUSINESS
AND CAREERS WILL BECOME THE NORM!!
ALAN C. WALTER
26 June 1996
Copyright (C) 1996 Alan C. Walter
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)