-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
TICK TOCK
Dicoms tick tock.
A DICOM is a Dichotomy of Comparable but Opposite Magnitude.
For example:
SOME - NO(NE)
ADORE - DETEST (ABHOR) DISDAIN DEPLORE ABOMINATE
COURAGE - COWARDICE
RESPECT - CONTEMPT
DESIRE - DON'T DESIRE
ENFORCE - INHIBIT
CREATE - DESTROY
Dicoms can be goals.
TO PUT THERE - TO NOT PUT THERE.
They can even be compound goals.
TO NOT PUT NOTHING THERE - TO NOT PUT SOMETHING THERE
TO PUT NOTHING THERE - TO PUT SOMETHING THERE
TO MAKE NOTHING OF - TO MAKE SOMETHING OF
TO NOT MAKE NOTHING OF - TO NOT MAKE SOMETHING OF
These are some examples of dicoms, there are thousands of them,
some common to every being alive, some specific to each individual.
The primary dicom is the ebb and flow of Native State:
UNMANIFEST - MANIFEST
STATIC - KINETIC
Everything else comes under those two. Probably the true top dicom
is the first one, unmanifest and manifest.
What is being manifested are dicoms, is - is not, static - kinetic
etc.
TICK TOCK
All dicoms tick tock, they flow back and forth between their
positive and negative poles.
Thus a sane being will first have his attention on something he
adores, and then this attention will move to something he abhors, often
something that is bugging something he adores, back and forth, adore,
abhor, adore, abhor.
SUPPRESSION
Beings like to suppress dicoms. It aids in persistence and thus
havingness, albeit a degraded havingness.
Well ok, from the view of native state, all persistence is
degraded havingness, and all degraded havingness is persistence.
But its all just more dicoms beating back and forth like
a clock.
TO PERSIST - TO VANISH
TO BE DO HAVE - TO NOT BE DO HAVE
But persistence is very important at the beginning of a universe
and any havingness is better than no havingness. Native State, He's
been there, done that, bought the eternal T-shirt, now he wants to have
FUN.
Apparently fun is love and terror in opposition.
A dicom is suppressed with the CDEINR scale:
Take for example, ADORE and DETEST mentioned above.
Curious about Adore - Abhor | SOME
Desire Adore - Abhor | SOME
Enforce Adore - Abhor | SOME
Inhibit Adore - Abhor | NO
NO Adore - Abhor | NO (none of)
Refuse Adore - Abhor | NO
Sub Refuse Adore - Abhor | NO
The dividing line between awareness of a dicom and unawareness is
the dividing line between Enforce and Inhibit.
We take SOME as representative of the awareness of the dicom, and
NO as representative of suppression of the dicom.
Thus at SOME adore-abhor, the being has awareness ranging from a
little to a whole lot on adoration and abhoration/abomination.
At NO adore-abhor, the being has little to no awareness of the
dicom at all.
Unfortunately the tick tocking between adore and abhor is ALSO
tick tocking between NO and SOME.
Thus we have a four way tick tock that is driving the being nuts
from its suppression.
NO ADORE - SOME ADORE
NO ABHOR - SOME ABHOR
When a dicom is suppressed, rather than motivating the being to go
out and bug the world like it is supposed to, the dicom sinks inwardly
and bugs the being instead. All manner of symptoms can arise from this,
from headaches, stuffed noses, and bad eye sight, to cancer and death
itself.
Yes cancer can be caused by eating radium too, but cancer can also
be caused by suppression of basic operating dicoms.
SYNC
The most important thing to understand about dicoms, beyond the
fact of their existence and activity, is how to run them.
As it says in Adore, Adoration is Operation, if you adore
something, operate it.
The opposite of adore is thus ex operation, an unwillingness and
refusal to operate what is abhored. Ex operation is basically crush,
when things are crushed, it is hard to operate them properly.
Primarily running a dicom means engaging in the rhythm of its
natural tick tock consciously rather than reactively or unconsciously.
If you are not there where your dicoms are already running, then
they are running you slightly out of sync as you are following their
lead, and thus you are running them in, and getting more solid about
things. Over a life time, this will result in becoming a marble.
Like listening to a real clock go tick tock, if you are there,
aware of, and present where your dicoms are already running, then you
end up running them out, and cleaning out the mass that has accumulated
around them in an effort to crush them and their tick tock out of
existence.
So the issuing of running suppressed dicoms is getting into sync
with both the tick tock of the dicom itself and the tick tock of the
suppression and unsupperssion, NO and SOME.
THE WHAT'S UP DOC RUNDOWN
In session, one finds a dicom the pc is interested in, mostly by
using the "What's up doc?" rundown.
Auditor: "What's up doc?"
PC: I love my cats to death.
The pc just gave you two fundamental dicoms, love and death.
Auditor: OK, I'd like to run love and death is that ok?
PC: You got balls.
Auditor: Ahem, boobs you mean, yes, could you please tell me the
opposites of love and death and how they might apply to your cats.
PC: Well I live in constant fear for my cat's well being, each even
has a radio collar on them, in case I have to go find their crushed body
lying on the road not yet dead somewhere.
And the opposite of death is life, I can't stand this place, it
creates all these beautiful things just to kill them off in the end. I
can't believe how morbid and sick this universe is.
Notice your pc just gave you three more dicoms, beauty, morbid and
sick.
Write them down for later, do not run now.
And the preclear says the opposite of love is fear.
(There is a deep religious issue here, should the auditor continue
to run "what's up doc?" and get more and more items until the pc has no
more, and THEN run all the items in order of presentation or read?
Or should the auditor run each item as they come up, never failing
to go back to the "Whats up doc?" question as long as more items are
available?
Some would tell you the first, but when run solo, one tends to run
everything as it presents itself, at least for a while. If they clam
up, then find more items and run them, and later come back to the first
items if they want to run some more.)
Auditor: OK, thanks for that, now I would like to run the items no
love and some love, and no death and some death. That ok with you?
PC: Yes.
So let's make this a bit simpler and just run
NO LOVE - SOME LOVE
Running items is a religion, people will do it however they feel
most comfortable. OUR religion tells us never to ask what questions
"What do you love?"
Questions of any type miss the point, and are almost always the
wrong answer until he gets a right answer if there are any. Questions
also restimulate the entire bank of trying to not know by pretending to
want to know via question asking, and lastly many questions are self
answering:
A: "What do you love?"
P: "I love asking questions!"
So our religion directs us to never ask auditing questions where
possible, but to use auditing commands instead. We are doing a touch
assist on the person's existence to make him more aware of what he is
both aware of and NOT aware of, and thus anything that touches that life
over and over again will produce results.
Our standard auditing command for all items is simply to spot it or
"Get the idea of".
"Spot NO LOVE".
"Spot SOME LOVE".
Now we have to be very clear here, NO means suppressed love or
pretended no love. It does not mean clear native state NO love where
there is NO of everything.
The way you tell the difference on the meter is normal NO love,
meaning pretended no love, will read, the needle will stop, stick and
fall, and communication and spots-it will come off the item.
True native state no love will cause the needle to float.
Thus FLOAT means really nothing there.
Stop, stick and fall means really something there pretending to be
nothing there.
The stop and stick happen the moment the preclear touches the ridge
of NO LOVE, and the fall happens when the preclear lets go a bit and
some of the steam comes off.
That's called fumaroling.
Enough fumaroling on the right items and the whole volcano will
blow.
Every time the preclear contacts a fumarole he will be just sure
this one is IT, the last one, and he runs the thing with his eyes
closed, praying to God, knowing that absolute incineration is right
around the corner.
Almost always not so, but he hears the volcano rumbling for sure.,
Once the volcano is really ready to blow, he will know it for sure
and won't be interested in fumaroles any more. He will LIFT the lid off
the volcano and MAKE it blow.
SYNC AGAIN
Now your preclear is tick tocking between no love and love.
He's got love for his cats and many other things that he knows
about, and I quite assure you he's got more love for all kinds of things
that he doesn't know about including more cats.
On the way up to native state, there is a place of blinding love
for everything, so take a look at it and know your preclear has some
auditing to do. Yes there will be places of blinding fear too, they
tend to alternate back and forth up the tone scale back to infinity.
Infinity has no problem with love or fear, and no problem finding
them.
The way to suppress a dicom that is going tick tock, is to go tick
tock out of sync with it, that is is go tock tick in sync with it.
OUT OF SYNC
DICOM Preclear DICOM Preclear
- -----------------------------------------------------------
tick tock some love no love
tock tick no love some love
tick tock some love no love
tock tick no love some love
Each cycle of the preclear being out of sync with the flows of the
dicom, builds up mass and an increasing disability to flow either love
or no love. When your preclear is unaware of dicoms or their activity,
he is pretty much continuously out of sync with them and thus sinking
and getting worse in life.
In fact you will find the preclear is doing this intentionally in
order to block out feelings of despair that he considers too oceanic to
survive.
As an auditor, your goal is to get the preclear to spot no love and
some love IN SYNC with the dicom as he is actually ticking it. In this
way the preclear becomes aware of the mechanism and stays aware of it
and with each aware operation of the dicom, prior mass built up from
suppression is released, until the whole dicom is clear without duress.
IN SYNC
DICOM Preclear DICOM Preclear
- -----------------------------------------------------------
tick tick some love some love
tock tock no love no love
tick tick some love some love
tock tock no love no love
RUNNING THE DICOM
Now one of the problem with running these dicoms, is they have been
messed up to a point where they no longer tick tock smoothly themselves.
They miss beats, they stammer, stutter, they tick tick twice in a row,
they stop, they go, etc. It is almost impossible to disrupt the rhythm
of a dicom, but your preclear has succeeded in doing so anyhow. That is
part of his goal of NO DICOM, to crush it and it's tick tock out of
existence, you see?
So as you are auditing this, you will find that your prclear is
constantly going out of sync with the dicom through no immediate fault
of his own.
THE DICOM DRIVES THE SESSION!
Not the pc nor the auditor.
Thus your session may go like this:
Auditor Preclear DICOM
- ------------------------------------------------------------
Spot a tick tick tick in sync
Spot a tock tock tock in sync
Spot a tick tick tick in sync
Spot a tock tock TICK pc grinds
Spot a tick tick TOCK pc grinds
Spot a TICK tick tick pc good to again.
Spot a tock tock tock in sync
Spot a tick tick tick in sync
Notice how the dicom ticked twice, thus throwing the preclear out
of sync. Reads stop happening, pc can't spot instances of the items, pc
says nothing there, loses interest, gets restless, loses emotion and
willingness to go on, and meter stops reading and starts to rise.
Notice how the auditor got the pc back in sync by running the same
item twice!
Understand this, the dicom is swinging onwards, regardless of what
the pc is doing, but the dicom may tick twice without tocking, it may
not swing smoothly for an instant.
So notice what the auditor has to do, remember the dicom drives the
session, the auditor and preclear MUST follow in sync.
Auditor Preclear DICOM
- -----------------------------------------------------------
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: Yak Yak Yak SOME love
Auditor 'Spot NO love' PC: Yak Yak Yak NO love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: Yak Yak Yak SOME love
Auditor 'Spot NO love' PC: Yak Yak Yak NO love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: glum NO love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: Yak Yak SOME love
Auditor 'Spot NO love' PC: Yak Yak NO love
The flows of the dicom rule the session, neither the auditor nor
the preclear can control which way the dicom goes next, not at least
until it is clear as a clear blue sky.
Sometimes, often in fact, the dicom will go totally out of control,
almost as if it is trying to outwit the auditor to get the flow right.
It may be, dicoms are infested with elemental life forms that quite have
a will of their own. But they are merely many riders on the back of the
stallion. Talk to the stallion, and the control will come back, but in
the mean time one can help bring control back merely by double calling
each item, until sync is reestablished.
Auditor Preclear DICOM
- -----------------------------------------------------------
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: Yak Yak Yak SOME love
Auditor 'Spot NO love' PC: Yak Yak Yak NO love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: glum ???? love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: glum ???? love
Auditor 'Spot NO love' PC: glum ???? love
Auditor 'Spot NO love' PC: glum ???? love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: glum NO love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: Oh yes, Yak Yak SOME love
Auditor 'Spot NO love' PC: Yak, yak NO love
This might look and sound complicated, you are trying to unwind a
guys life after all, it looks kind of like an octopus in amber, but it
does want to be run out, and it is cooperating with you as auditor and
pc to the best of its ability.
And so with a little understanding applied, the auditor can keep
the pc in sync enough to get the thing to run. As running goes on, sync
becomes easier and easier until it becomes a natural way of auditing and
living.
In particular once the preclear 'gets it' himself, he will correct
the sync of the auditor automatically, if the dicom jerks him around.
Auditor Preclear DICOM
- -----------------------------------------------------------
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: Yak Yak Yak SOME love
Auditor 'Spot NO love' PC: Yak Yak Yak NO love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: Yak Yak Yak SOME love
Auditor 'Spot NO love' PC: Yak Yak Yak NO love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: NO love yak yak NO love
Auditor 'Spot SOME love' PC: yak yak SOME love
Notice the preclear rather than going glum, realized the sync was
out, answered the command that should have been asked, and the auditor
needs to be smart enough to ask the same question AGAIN!
And the auditor doesn't ask the command again to make the preclear
wrong, or for any other reason than the dicom has ticked again to where
the command is right.
Also notice this saved the auditor one whole glum cycle.
Dicoms can go out of sync for any number of reasons, many of which
are simply the dicom's own inability to flow easily.
But a preclear can also fail to get all the data on a SOME, and the
auditor moves onto NO too fast thus leaving the pc back on SOME.
Running SOME again will fix it.
A preclear may be running faster than the auditor can keep up, thus
while running SOME, the preclear may finish and move on to answer NO
also. The auditor can SEE this happening though and then run SOME as
the next item rather than run NO which the PC just offered and
completed.
This can get to be a bit of a dance and both auditor and preclear
need to get good at not stepping on the dicom's toes.
Since the dicom has its own beat, it is not possible to make the pc
wait for the auditor's command before he gives answers, the dicom has
its own life and must be kept up with. What makes the session run is
the pc remaining in sync and reporting on the dicom, not the auditor!
The auditor is there to help the preclear when he has sticky feet
while dancing with the dicom and to keep him conscious when the flows
get heavey. But once the preclear gets good at this, the auditor has
little purpose than to receive what the preclear says, acknowledge it,
and stay out of the way.
There is a natural rhythm to the tick tocking of a dicom. It may
be 1 second or 1 minute or more.
Once the rhythm is established, and the auditor can interact with
the preclear within his rhythm time, auditing can take place very fast
on very powerful flows. Flows like rivers or molten land.
The auditor's own natural rhythm cycle on this same item may be
different than the preclears! Although the auditor is enjoined to not
have a case in session, good luck.
If the auditor and preclear have 5 seconds to get the data on a 'NO
LOVE', they had better get the data within those 5 seconds, or the dicom
will have swung the other way. Thus a slow auditor can really mess up a
preclear.
Also if the items being run are say adore and abhor, and the
preclear has those items on his auditor, it can get complicated.
At some point the preclear will have to start soloing this
material, as any auditor at all is a complication and restimulator in
the natural swing of the dicoms he is trying to run.
Particularly NO HELP and SOME HELP.
The reach for help has been and can be deadly.
Many preclears will run adore and abhor on auditing itself even
solo.
So a full session on our preclear would involve both sides of the
dicom pair:
Spot NO LOVE
Spot SOME LOVE
Spot NO Fear
Spot SOME Fear
Always run the NO item first, he already gave you the SOME, that's
how you got the item, but if no run, double call until in sync.
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Tue Feb 23 22:22:03 EST 2010
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sun Feb 13 12:00:02 EST 2022
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore721.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFiCTkVURT1lqxE3HERAjbbAJ9h6p1sLgFERD5MIimpshEw1/uU0wCgkdk8
0E/+IPfnpoXYddN7SUV84hM=
=kBZA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Wednesday, March 2, 2022
ADORE661 (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
MECHANICAL ANALOGUES ARE NOT SPIRIT
Homer:
>> If God is conscious, then not only is his consciousness not made of
>>matter, energy, space and time, neither is ours.
SP Bill:
> That doesn't follow. If God were conscious and created us (as well as the
> rest of everything) - there is no reason he couldn't have created us any
> way he wanted.
This asserts the fallacy that functionality above space and time
mechanics, can be replicated using space and time mechanics.
Mechanical analogues can be created that act AS IF they were the
real thing, like a doll that says 'I am hungry' when you pull it's
string, but it doesn't feel anything.
Zero dimensional functionality can not be replicated at all in
multidimensional space time mechanics.
Robots that are programmed to act AS IF they feel pain, will never
in fact act the same way as entities that do feel pain, because pain
itself is causal, and you can't make something that feels pain out of
parts that don't.
And parts that don't feel pain will always act as if they don't
feel pain, no matter how much you make sure they say 'Ouch!' at the
right times.
In fact state determined space time machines can't replicate non
state determined spiritual entities at all come to think of it, except
at very shallow layers.
At a deeper level the whole idea that anything could CREATE
anything is itself absurd.
Thus what exists now has existed forever and will continue to exist
forever.
The something which exists now, can never create anything new that
doesn't already exist, it can only change state into possibly newer
patterns.
Space and time are glow in the dark illusions displayed in the body
of God, which is immutable and eternal. The light show comes and goes,
but nothing of material import changes, the pixels remain eternal and
immutable whether they are off or on.
The move from unmanifestation to manifestation is not an act of
CREATION of something that wasn't there before. True Something is
always conserved. The preexisting sleeping something merely changed
state to become aware of light shows.
Thus God could not have created the soul, nor anything else for
that matter, and thus God and Soul must be One and co eternal.
Homer
Mon Apr 6 14:53:26 EDT 2009
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Fri Feb 11 12:00:03 EST 2022
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore661.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFiBpYUURT1lqxE3HERAqMpAKCh03oMic3nQRXhDVpthVomH/Ej9gCeKrkN
Sxagl0KcJWXzAoR08t3254k=
=DSTS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
MECHANICAL ANALOGUES ARE NOT SPIRIT
Homer:
>> If God is conscious, then not only is his consciousness not made of
>>matter, energy, space and time, neither is ours.
SP Bill:
> That doesn't follow. If God were conscious and created us (as well as the
> rest of everything) - there is no reason he couldn't have created us any
> way he wanted.
This asserts the fallacy that functionality above space and time
mechanics, can be replicated using space and time mechanics.
Mechanical analogues can be created that act AS IF they were the
real thing, like a doll that says 'I am hungry' when you pull it's
string, but it doesn't feel anything.
Zero dimensional functionality can not be replicated at all in
multidimensional space time mechanics.
Robots that are programmed to act AS IF they feel pain, will never
in fact act the same way as entities that do feel pain, because pain
itself is causal, and you can't make something that feels pain out of
parts that don't.
And parts that don't feel pain will always act as if they don't
feel pain, no matter how much you make sure they say 'Ouch!' at the
right times.
In fact state determined space time machines can't replicate non
state determined spiritual entities at all come to think of it, except
at very shallow layers.
At a deeper level the whole idea that anything could CREATE
anything is itself absurd.
Thus what exists now has existed forever and will continue to exist
forever.
The something which exists now, can never create anything new that
doesn't already exist, it can only change state into possibly newer
patterns.
Space and time are glow in the dark illusions displayed in the body
of God, which is immutable and eternal. The light show comes and goes,
but nothing of material import changes, the pixels remain eternal and
immutable whether they are off or on.
The move from unmanifestation to manifestation is not an act of
CREATION of something that wasn't there before. True Something is
always conserved. The preexisting sleeping something merely changed
state to become aware of light shows.
Thus God could not have created the soul, nor anything else for
that matter, and thus God and Soul must be One and co eternal.
Homer
Mon Apr 6 14:53:26 EDT 2009
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Fri Feb 11 12:00:03 EST 2022
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore661.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFiBpYUURT1lqxE3HERAqMpAKCh03oMic3nQRXhDVpthVomH/Ej9gCeKrkN
Sxagl0KcJWXzAoR08t3254k=
=DSTS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
ADORE419 (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
WHAT IS IMPROVEMENT
jacksonmoore69@hotmail.com wrote:
>What processes do you think are the most workable in the long run that
>make clear improvements in the persons overall life?
>What do you consider an improvement? you may ask
Awareness of self as an immortal conscious unit, able to operate
time and timelessness with equal ease.
In contact with motivation for manifesting, and taking over bodies.
Free to choose to do or not do so in the future.
Recovery of awareness of choice for being here.
Able to trip with out acid.
Exterior.
>1 - I think Objective processes work well a it really pulls you out of
>the bank and helps untangle your circuits.....I don't think it needs to
>be done for eons.....This goes for TRs as well......can't go wrong.....
The whole bridge is good for people who are not stuck in massive
service fac cave in's. If they can be sat down, run ruds, and get a
good float at the beginning of each session, it should be easy to run
the Grades and engrams and secondaries to a marked improved state of
physical well being, including losing the glasses, need for drugs, wine,
medicine, alcohol and doctors,
But eventually you are going to run into the pc's truncated present
time GPM. That is the GPM he is presently living that hasn't completed
a sashay from bottom (earliest) to top (latest) reliable item.
Once you nuke that, you got a first goal clear, and THAT is
probably the first time the guy will say 'You know, maybe this shit
works after all' You see its been working all along and he will admit
it, but its always right back into the soup again the next day, wins
just don't last.
That's because the bigger he gets from all the
grades/engrams/secondaries stuff, the harder he dramatizes his PT GPM.
THAT makes him sick as a dog, even while he sleeps. Sleep makes
him worse!
Most people by the way let the contractions of labor put them to
sleep. Then they wonder how come they can't run birth. Been using it
too long to go to sleep! You can feel these contractions when you first
wake up, if you lay there fore a while going in and out of sleep.
But none of this is going to run well unless the pc is
indoctrinated into the "I am a conscious unit" theory of existence and
gets a lot of false data stripping done to clear the way for his mind
to be open enough to be receptive to the stuff that needs to turn on
to be run.
He doesn't need to believe, or have faith in things he doesn't
or can not know. He needs to STOP believing things he doens't or
can not know. Then once the personal integrity is in, which is
a matter of ethics, then his mind is free to restimulate as it needs to.
If you keep thinking you are nothing more than a process in a
brain, there will be nothing to audit, and the secondaries will be
oceanically overwhelming, and you won't ever go near them again, let
alone run them out.
Roland exteriorized, he HAS all the proof he needs, its right
there in the incident, he has missed it over and over again
all these years, so he's screaming for proof.
All he needs is for someone to rehab the exterior with a fine
tooth comb until he spots his proof, and he will start acting
like a decent human being again. Until then he will remain
a douchebag with a mouth.
Homer
>Thanks
>JM
- --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Thu Dec 21 01:43:56 EST 2006
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Wed Feb 2 12:00:03 EST 2022
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore419.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFh+riTURT1lqxE3HERAlY7AJ95pJAbjwJRn7EhJSzD0VW54wCURgCbB9HA
RCLTbfWvXJ+utu2Awcphqb8=
=+Xnz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
WHAT IS IMPROVEMENT
jacksonmoore69@hotmail.com wrote:
>What processes do you think are the most workable in the long run that
>make clear improvements in the persons overall life?
>What do you consider an improvement? you may ask
Awareness of self as an immortal conscious unit, able to operate
time and timelessness with equal ease.
In contact with motivation for manifesting, and taking over bodies.
Free to choose to do or not do so in the future.
Recovery of awareness of choice for being here.
Able to trip with out acid.
Exterior.
>1 - I think Objective processes work well a it really pulls you out of
>the bank and helps untangle your circuits.....I don't think it needs to
>be done for eons.....This goes for TRs as well......can't go wrong.....
The whole bridge is good for people who are not stuck in massive
service fac cave in's. If they can be sat down, run ruds, and get a
good float at the beginning of each session, it should be easy to run
the Grades and engrams and secondaries to a marked improved state of
physical well being, including losing the glasses, need for drugs, wine,
medicine, alcohol and doctors,
But eventually you are going to run into the pc's truncated present
time GPM. That is the GPM he is presently living that hasn't completed
a sashay from bottom (earliest) to top (latest) reliable item.
Once you nuke that, you got a first goal clear, and THAT is
probably the first time the guy will say 'You know, maybe this shit
works after all' You see its been working all along and he will admit
it, but its always right back into the soup again the next day, wins
just don't last.
That's because the bigger he gets from all the
grades/engrams/secondaries stuff, the harder he dramatizes his PT GPM.
THAT makes him sick as a dog, even while he sleeps. Sleep makes
him worse!
Most people by the way let the contractions of labor put them to
sleep. Then they wonder how come they can't run birth. Been using it
too long to go to sleep! You can feel these contractions when you first
wake up, if you lay there fore a while going in and out of sleep.
But none of this is going to run well unless the pc is
indoctrinated into the "I am a conscious unit" theory of existence and
gets a lot of false data stripping done to clear the way for his mind
to be open enough to be receptive to the stuff that needs to turn on
to be run.
He doesn't need to believe, or have faith in things he doesn't
or can not know. He needs to STOP believing things he doens't or
can not know. Then once the personal integrity is in, which is
a matter of ethics, then his mind is free to restimulate as it needs to.
If you keep thinking you are nothing more than a process in a
brain, there will be nothing to audit, and the secondaries will be
oceanically overwhelming, and you won't ever go near them again, let
alone run them out.
Roland exteriorized, he HAS all the proof he needs, its right
there in the incident, he has missed it over and over again
all these years, so he's screaming for proof.
All he needs is for someone to rehab the exterior with a fine
tooth comb until he spots his proof, and he will start acting
like a decent human being again. Until then he will remain
a douchebag with a mouth.
Homer
>Thanks
>JM
- --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Thu Dec 21 01:43:56 EST 2006
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Wed Feb 2 12:00:03 EST 2022
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore419.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFh+riTURT1lqxE3HERAlY7AJ95pJAbjwJRn7EhJSzD0VW54wCURgCbB9HA
RCLTbfWvXJ+utu2Awcphqb8=
=+Xnz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Thursday, August 5, 2021
PROOF35 (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
SYMBOLS AND REFERENTS III
So far we have determined a number of salient points about symbols
and referents.
Both symbols and referents are actualities, objects, the first used
to refer to the second. Neither is a priori more or less actual than
the other. People can however use symbols to refer to referents so
heavily and exclusively that they lose sight that the symbol is its own
object worthy of study itself.
Second, because symbols and referents are both actual objects, both
have qualities of their own that may have nothing to do with each other
except that some of the qualities in the symbol may be used to refer to
some of the qualities of the referent.
For example a referent 'red plastic ball' may be made of plastic,
but it certainly is not red. The symbol in our consciousness is red.
Now we use that red symbol to refer to light waves bouncing off the ball
of certain frequency, but that connection between red consciousness and
light of a given frequency is in fact arbitrary.
Take an X-Ray picture of a star for example, where the various
frequencies of X-rays are delineated by colors of the rainbow so we can
see them. Red now refers to low frequency X-rays, and violet to high
frequency X-rays.
Now some astronomer looking at such a picture might point to a star
in the image and say "Hey I found a red star!'. But there is no way
that star is red. The quality of the symbol has been ascribed to the
referent, and now the referent is being described via the qualities of
the symbol, 'red stars' etc.
The quality of the symbol can have little to do with the quality of
the referent other than arbitrary assignment. When you start describing
the quality of the referent by the quality of the symbol you have
started down the road to confusion.
We do this all the time in normal life. We see a car and we say
'That car is red!'. No way is that car red in any possible sense of the
word, but the picture in our consciousness sure is.
Of course this kind of merging the qualities of the symbol with the
quality of the referent doesn't normally lead to trouble as we all know
that underlying 'red car' is the actual meaning 'this car reflects light
of a certain frequency'. The translation from 'red' to 'frequency' in
our minds becomes automatic, and so we get along with the misnaming.
The quality of redness is not even vaguely similar to the quality
of reflecting light of a certain frequency.
Redness is a quality of being of our conscious picture.
Reflecting light of a certain frequency is a quality of relation
between the car and light waves.
So unless we are careful to understand this process, the trip to
perdition can be swift and sure.
For example that 'red car' we see out there is also seen to be
sitting in a 3 dimensional space. We can SEE the space no? We can SEE
the 3 dimensions, right?
But anything we SEE in our consciousness is at best a SYMBOL for an
alleged referent. So if the car is not red just because we see red,
perhaps space is not dimensional just because it looks dimensional to
our consciousness.
In other words just because we see red, doesn't mean there IS red
OUT THERE, there may be something, but its association with redness in
our consciousness is an arbitrary hook together.
Just so with space. Just because we SEE space in our conscious
picture of the car, doesn't mean there is actual space OUT THERE. What
the true nature of the referent is, might be very different from what
our symbol looks like, or non existent altogether.
We see space in dreams, but surely there is no actual space there,
except as a in our conscious picture.
Now one might possibly claim that, that the world is not a dream,
and thus since we see a symbol of something in our consciousness,
SOMETHING must exist out there as the referent.
My point is that deriving the NATURE of the referent by the NATURE
of the symbol is a philosophical mistake of vast proportions.
Further if we can concede that the symbols might exist in our
consciousness without any actual existing referents at all (such as in
imagination, hallucination or a sleep dream), then our conclusion that
because we see space there must be space is completely wrong.
(A dream is a panoply of symbols implying referents where there are
in fact no actual existing referents, a virtual reality.)
It makes sense to us however that if symbols and referents do share
some qualities, that the qualities they share in common should be used
to refer to each other.
So if the car out there has dimensionality, and our conscious
pictures of the car also have 'dimensionality', it makes sense that the
dimensionality of our conscious pictures be used to refer to the
dimensionality of the car out there.
The point is that the existence of dimensionality in our symbolic
consciousness does not itself provide proof of dimensionality in the
referent.
The word interpretation means the ability to translate from symbol
to referent. One looks at the symbol and from the symbol we interpret
what the referent must be like.
Interpretation of words, pictures, data, all of which are symbols
for actual referents, is an important part of daily life and successful
living.
Now some people will say that our conscious pictures are our
interpretation of the physical universe, we see space in our
consciousness because that is our brain's interpretation of its data
coming from the the actual external universe.
But that is backwards you see, they are claiming the symbol is an
interpretation of the referent!
It is true that the electronic data received through the senses
in the brain is a symbol for the alleged external referent, and
the brain certainly has a right to interpret its symbolic data to mean
that the referent then really does have space.
But the brain then RERENDERS that interpretation as a picture of
space in our consciousness which is yet another symbol for the referent.
- From our point of view WE then interpret that the referent has space
because our conscious symbol of it does.
They say we see space in our conscious symbol because there IS
space in the referent!
But in fact we believe there IS space in the referent because we
see space in our conscious symbols of things!
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Thu Aug 5 12:00:06 EDT 2021
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/proof35.memo.bak
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFhDAsHURT1lqxE3HERAtUmAKDIspcMTBXy8EjG993bE1mSHED1jwCgio/O
LAg6mEY2S1lBGHRxTz7OB/E=
=uTqP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
SYMBOLS AND REFERENTS III
So far we have determined a number of salient points about symbols
and referents.
Both symbols and referents are actualities, objects, the first used
to refer to the second. Neither is a priori more or less actual than
the other. People can however use symbols to refer to referents so
heavily and exclusively that they lose sight that the symbol is its own
object worthy of study itself.
Second, because symbols and referents are both actual objects, both
have qualities of their own that may have nothing to do with each other
except that some of the qualities in the symbol may be used to refer to
some of the qualities of the referent.
For example a referent 'red plastic ball' may be made of plastic,
but it certainly is not red. The symbol in our consciousness is red.
Now we use that red symbol to refer to light waves bouncing off the ball
of certain frequency, but that connection between red consciousness and
light of a given frequency is in fact arbitrary.
Take an X-Ray picture of a star for example, where the various
frequencies of X-rays are delineated by colors of the rainbow so we can
see them. Red now refers to low frequency X-rays, and violet to high
frequency X-rays.
Now some astronomer looking at such a picture might point to a star
in the image and say "Hey I found a red star!'. But there is no way
that star is red. The quality of the symbol has been ascribed to the
referent, and now the referent is being described via the qualities of
the symbol, 'red stars' etc.
The quality of the symbol can have little to do with the quality of
the referent other than arbitrary assignment. When you start describing
the quality of the referent by the quality of the symbol you have
started down the road to confusion.
We do this all the time in normal life. We see a car and we say
'That car is red!'. No way is that car red in any possible sense of the
word, but the picture in our consciousness sure is.
Of course this kind of merging the qualities of the symbol with the
quality of the referent doesn't normally lead to trouble as we all know
that underlying 'red car' is the actual meaning 'this car reflects light
of a certain frequency'. The translation from 'red' to 'frequency' in
our minds becomes automatic, and so we get along with the misnaming.
The quality of redness is not even vaguely similar to the quality
of reflecting light of a certain frequency.
Redness is a quality of being of our conscious picture.
Reflecting light of a certain frequency is a quality of relation
between the car and light waves.
So unless we are careful to understand this process, the trip to
perdition can be swift and sure.
For example that 'red car' we see out there is also seen to be
sitting in a 3 dimensional space. We can SEE the space no? We can SEE
the 3 dimensions, right?
But anything we SEE in our consciousness is at best a SYMBOL for an
alleged referent. So if the car is not red just because we see red,
perhaps space is not dimensional just because it looks dimensional to
our consciousness.
In other words just because we see red, doesn't mean there IS red
OUT THERE, there may be something, but its association with redness in
our consciousness is an arbitrary hook together.
Just so with space. Just because we SEE space in our conscious
picture of the car, doesn't mean there is actual space OUT THERE. What
the true nature of the referent is, might be very different from what
our symbol looks like, or non existent altogether.
We see space in dreams, but surely there is no actual space there,
except as a in our conscious picture.
Now one might possibly claim that, that the world is not a dream,
and thus since we see a symbol of something in our consciousness,
SOMETHING must exist out there as the referent.
My point is that deriving the NATURE of the referent by the NATURE
of the symbol is a philosophical mistake of vast proportions.
Further if we can concede that the symbols might exist in our
consciousness without any actual existing referents at all (such as in
imagination, hallucination or a sleep dream), then our conclusion that
because we see space there must be space is completely wrong.
(A dream is a panoply of symbols implying referents where there are
in fact no actual existing referents, a virtual reality.)
It makes sense to us however that if symbols and referents do share
some qualities, that the qualities they share in common should be used
to refer to each other.
So if the car out there has dimensionality, and our conscious
pictures of the car also have 'dimensionality', it makes sense that the
dimensionality of our conscious pictures be used to refer to the
dimensionality of the car out there.
The point is that the existence of dimensionality in our symbolic
consciousness does not itself provide proof of dimensionality in the
referent.
The word interpretation means the ability to translate from symbol
to referent. One looks at the symbol and from the symbol we interpret
what the referent must be like.
Interpretation of words, pictures, data, all of which are symbols
for actual referents, is an important part of daily life and successful
living.
Now some people will say that our conscious pictures are our
interpretation of the physical universe, we see space in our
consciousness because that is our brain's interpretation of its data
coming from the the actual external universe.
But that is backwards you see, they are claiming the symbol is an
interpretation of the referent!
It is true that the electronic data received through the senses
in the brain is a symbol for the alleged external referent, and
the brain certainly has a right to interpret its symbolic data to mean
that the referent then really does have space.
But the brain then RERENDERS that interpretation as a picture of
space in our consciousness which is yet another symbol for the referent.
- From our point of view WE then interpret that the referent has space
because our conscious symbol of it does.
They say we see space in our conscious symbol because there IS
space in the referent!
But in fact we believe there IS space in the referent because we
see space in our conscious symbols of things!
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Thu Aug 5 12:00:06 EDT 2021
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/proof35.memo.bak
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFhDAsHURT1lqxE3HERAtUmAKDIspcMTBXy8EjG993bE1mSHED1jwCgio/O
LAg6mEY2S1lBGHRxTz7OB/E=
=uTqP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Monday, August 2, 2021
ADORE667 (fwd)
UNAUDITABILITY
This was written on 8/03/1999 but got lost in the system.
Homer
> So there are 2 ways - steadily improve your average tone, without worrying
> about
> the small things as they will drop out by themselves. Or have some
> solo tech to apply during the low tone. Do you know any?
> Nothing solo works for me in low tone. This is like cold - you
> have to wait some time before it vanishes by itself. During
> this time you sneeze here and there inevitably. How to
> control low toned condition?
There may be central cores to our cases that are 'unauditable', one
has to wait through them. Try to run 'unauditability' as an item. Also
waiting and enduring.
Remember every item of importance has an anti item.
Future - Anti Future
Get the idea of a future.
Get the idea of an anti future.
etc.
Sometimes the anti items are totally non obvious, but running
them produces *MARKED* results anyhow.
Sovereignty - Anti Sovereignty
Adoration - Anti Adoration
Operation - Anti Operation
Class - Anti Class
Majesty - Anti Majesty
Pride - Anti Pride
Magnificence - Anti Magnificence
Glory - Anti Glory
Source - Anti Source
Respect - Anti Respect
Tragedy - Anti Tragedy
Travesty - Anti Travesty
Ludicrous - Anti Ludicrous
Demise - Anti Demise
Agony - Anti Agony
Ecstasy - Anti Ecstasy
Golden Temper - Anti Golden Temper
Romance - Anti Romance
Thrill - Anti Thrill
Sin Song - Anti Sin Song
Joke - Anti Joke
Imp Soul - Anti Imp Soul
Humor - Anti Humor
Halcyon - Anti Halcyon
High Cool - High Anti Cool
High Friend - High Anti Friend
Miracle - Anti Miracle
King - Anti King
Get used to swinging wide on both sides of the dicoms
that you run into.
If you have an ascension experience, run the descension
experience! If you have a descension experience, run the
ascension experience! They come in pairs.
Don't use opposites like good and bad, use the anti form
Ascension - Anti Ascension
Descension - Anti Descension
Good - Anti Good
Bad - Anti Bad
This isn't a solo process so much as a way to live life and
field the curve balls it is throwing you.
Life - Anti Life
Don't let an important concept go by without running both sides of it,
*DEEPLY* and beyond when you might think it is flat.
Important - Anti Important
Unimportant - Anti Unimportant
Also remember there is not-isness producing a 'No' Item.
No can mean truly not there, but it usually means No at
the bottom of the CDEINR scale. Pretended not there.
No Importance - No Anti Importance
The basic form is
Postulate - Anti Postulate
No Postulate - No Anti Postulate
Take any subject.
Pretty girls.
"Is there a postulate on pretty girls?"
"Is there an anti postulate on pretty girls?"
"is there a no postulate on pretty girls?"
"Is there a no anti postulate on pretty girls?"
You don't have to get *WHAT* the postulate is, you want the FORCE on
both sides of the postulates. The actual what may or may not come to you.
It's the force that you are killing yourself with, particularly the 'no'
part of the force.
Its one thing to be operating postulates and anti postulates and know
it, and quite another to be operating no postulates and no anti postulates
and not know it! Something else is creating the world and our condition
in it right?
Anti postulates are necessary to produce an ongoing space time
game stream, so trying to get rid of anti postulates is fool hardy,
but running them and reoptimzing their balance against the postulates
can work miracles.
You want to get to your car, that's a postulate. But you can't just
get there by wanting it, desire isn't sovereign for a while, you have to
*WALK* to your car. That's an anti postulate.
Most people are unaware of postulates and anti postulates, so they
need to run No Postulate - No Anti Postulate first, until the come up to
recognizing that postulates and anti postulates are all that exist and
cause anything. It's not a head cognition, they *SEE* it all of a sudden,
and they see they are operating both sides of operation and anti operation
and they been anti operating THAT for a long time too!
Try
Source - Anti Source
Sovereign Source - Anti Sovereign Source
Sovereign Anti Source - Anti Sovereign Anti Source
Don't ask 'What the !@#@#% does that mean?'
Run the item, let existence show you what it means. Don't presume to
know. Existence is *WAY BIG*, it has more to offer us than we can know
until we get it. Knowing what there is to know is a covert way of not
knowing what there is to know and how much we don't know.
Also remember Adore defines a Miracle as
The *UNDREAMED* dream come true.
If you know what you want, it ain't no miracle if you get it,
no matter what it is.
What there is to have and get is *WAY* beyond our comprehension in the
not have state, let existence give it to you without knowing what it is
before you have it. That produces havingness that is just out of this
world. It's the undreamed dream come true that results in Joy in Eternal
Miracles.
Miracle - Anti Miracle
No Miracle - No Anti Miracle
JOY is Joke's On You.
Homer
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Thu Jul 29 12:00:05 EDT 2021
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore667.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFhAtCFURT1lqxE3HERAtduAKCjRQCM1Fy0tZzts4Oa5uEvKbkdpgCfenEY
lrtwHs3aZRvk/die/qW8+xM=
=OOcp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
This was written on 8/03/1999 but got lost in the system.
Homer
> So there are 2 ways - steadily improve your average tone, without worrying
> about
> the small things as they will drop out by themselves. Or have some
> solo tech to apply during the low tone. Do you know any?
> Nothing solo works for me in low tone. This is like cold - you
> have to wait some time before it vanishes by itself. During
> this time you sneeze here and there inevitably. How to
> control low toned condition?
There may be central cores to our cases that are 'unauditable', one
has to wait through them. Try to run 'unauditability' as an item. Also
waiting and enduring.
Remember every item of importance has an anti item.
Future - Anti Future
Get the idea of a future.
Get the idea of an anti future.
etc.
Sometimes the anti items are totally non obvious, but running
them produces *MARKED* results anyhow.
Sovereignty - Anti Sovereignty
Adoration - Anti Adoration
Operation - Anti Operation
Class - Anti Class
Majesty - Anti Majesty
Pride - Anti Pride
Magnificence - Anti Magnificence
Glory - Anti Glory
Source - Anti Source
Respect - Anti Respect
Tragedy - Anti Tragedy
Travesty - Anti Travesty
Ludicrous - Anti Ludicrous
Demise - Anti Demise
Agony - Anti Agony
Ecstasy - Anti Ecstasy
Golden Temper - Anti Golden Temper
Romance - Anti Romance
Thrill - Anti Thrill
Sin Song - Anti Sin Song
Joke - Anti Joke
Imp Soul - Anti Imp Soul
Humor - Anti Humor
Halcyon - Anti Halcyon
High Cool - High Anti Cool
High Friend - High Anti Friend
Miracle - Anti Miracle
King - Anti King
Get used to swinging wide on both sides of the dicoms
that you run into.
If you have an ascension experience, run the descension
experience! If you have a descension experience, run the
ascension experience! They come in pairs.
Don't use opposites like good and bad, use the anti form
Ascension - Anti Ascension
Descension - Anti Descension
Good - Anti Good
Bad - Anti Bad
This isn't a solo process so much as a way to live life and
field the curve balls it is throwing you.
Life - Anti Life
Don't let an important concept go by without running both sides of it,
*DEEPLY* and beyond when you might think it is flat.
Important - Anti Important
Unimportant - Anti Unimportant
Also remember there is not-isness producing a 'No' Item.
No can mean truly not there, but it usually means No at
the bottom of the CDEINR scale. Pretended not there.
No Importance - No Anti Importance
The basic form is
Postulate - Anti Postulate
No Postulate - No Anti Postulate
Take any subject.
Pretty girls.
"Is there a postulate on pretty girls?"
"Is there an anti postulate on pretty girls?"
"is there a no postulate on pretty girls?"
"Is there a no anti postulate on pretty girls?"
You don't have to get *WHAT* the postulate is, you want the FORCE on
both sides of the postulates. The actual what may or may not come to you.
It's the force that you are killing yourself with, particularly the 'no'
part of the force.
Its one thing to be operating postulates and anti postulates and know
it, and quite another to be operating no postulates and no anti postulates
and not know it! Something else is creating the world and our condition
in it right?
Anti postulates are necessary to produce an ongoing space time
game stream, so trying to get rid of anti postulates is fool hardy,
but running them and reoptimzing their balance against the postulates
can work miracles.
You want to get to your car, that's a postulate. But you can't just
get there by wanting it, desire isn't sovereign for a while, you have to
*WALK* to your car. That's an anti postulate.
Most people are unaware of postulates and anti postulates, so they
need to run No Postulate - No Anti Postulate first, until the come up to
recognizing that postulates and anti postulates are all that exist and
cause anything. It's not a head cognition, they *SEE* it all of a sudden,
and they see they are operating both sides of operation and anti operation
and they been anti operating THAT for a long time too!
Try
Source - Anti Source
Sovereign Source - Anti Sovereign Source
Sovereign Anti Source - Anti Sovereign Anti Source
Don't ask 'What the !@#@#% does that mean?'
Run the item, let existence show you what it means. Don't presume to
know. Existence is *WAY BIG*, it has more to offer us than we can know
until we get it. Knowing what there is to know is a covert way of not
knowing what there is to know and how much we don't know.
Also remember Adore defines a Miracle as
The *UNDREAMED* dream come true.
If you know what you want, it ain't no miracle if you get it,
no matter what it is.
What there is to have and get is *WAY* beyond our comprehension in the
not have state, let existence give it to you without knowing what it is
before you have it. That produces havingness that is just out of this
world. It's the undreamed dream come true that results in Joy in Eternal
Miracles.
Miracle - Anti Miracle
No Miracle - No Anti Miracle
JOY is Joke's On You.
Homer
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Thu Jul 29 12:00:05 EDT 2021
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore667.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFhAtCFURT1lqxE3HERAtduAKCjRQCM1Fy0tZzts4Oa5uEvKbkdpgCfenEY
lrtwHs3aZRvk/die/qW8+xM=
=OOcp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
ACT92 (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
((Editor's comments in double parenthesis - Homer))
THE GAMES WE PLAY
ACT - 92
25 December 1995
Copyright (C) 1994 Homer Wilson Smith
Redistribution rights granted for non commercial purposes.
Life is a game.
When people undertake to play a game, they design the playing
field, and the rules of play, they train in that play, and they
eventually invite the opposing team to come and play.
When people find themselves forced to play a game that they don't
want to play, rather than play the game, they will try to destroy the
game, or destroy the other side, particularly if they think the other
side is the one forcing them to play.
If the other side thinks that YOU are the one forcing them to play,
then they will take to playing the game of destroying you, which of
course puts you in a game you don't want to play so you will take to
trying to destroy them back.
In this way the game of playing against the opponent, becomes the
game of destroying the game and opponent.
It's not much of a foot ball game if one side takes out shotguns
and blasts away at the other side just as they kick off.
An analysis of games then would include an analysis of how the
various games we are playing have decayed down into the game of
destroying the game and the other side.
You know from LRH that games consist of Purposes, Barriers and
Freedoms in that order of importance.
But they also involve DESIGN, TRAINING, INVITATION, WELCOME, PLAY,
HALFTIME, and the after game HAND SHAKE.
You can take a look at any activity you are engaged in through out
the day and spot its various games aspects. This includes purposes,
barriers and freedoms, but also design, training, invitation, welcome,
play, half time and the ending handshake, all of which add up to
"putting the game there".
Life's games go well to the degree that both sides are putting it
there. The minute someone starts not putting it there, and trying to
put it not there, the game goes to hell and becomes the game of
destroying the game and the opposing team.
The side that is the most bent on destroying the game always loses,
because you can't destroy what you "aren't putting there".
The way you destroy something is to PUT IT THERE TWICE!
If people continue to not put the game there, the GAME wins, as
everyone is forced to play the game of destroying unwanted persisting
games forever.
The game persists solely because the players aren't putting it
there with design, training, invitation, welcome, play, half time and
handshake.
Thus the best they can do is play forever in an unwanted game,
which is the definition of hell.
That's how MEST wins. That's how Creators (thetans) become pieces
in the Creature's (MEST's) game.
So take a look at it folks, see where your life has sunk into
destroying games instead of playing games.
Assess for
Start of Game
Purposes
Barriers
Freedoms
Design
Rules
Training
Invitation
Welcome
Teams
Spectators
Concessions
Umpires
Announcers
Play
Half Time
Come Back
Win/Lose
Handshake
End of Game
Remember that the goal to WIN a game is secondary to and derives
from the goal to PLAY a game.
This IS the definition of Sportsmanship.
If you find a game where winning is more important than playing,
you will have found a game where getting rid of the game is more
important than playing the game.
That defines an Overt.
Homer
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith This file may be found at
homer@lightlink.com ftp.lightlink.com/pub/homer/act92.memo
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Wed Jul 28 12:00:05 EDT 2021
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/act92.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFhAX8GURT1lqxE3HERAp4aAJ4jW2U2EYXeveblRHnoTGxPubUepgCfTLcY
JghCEg1eWeoEqxEu7eZgen0=
=sYyS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
((Editor's comments in double parenthesis - Homer))
THE GAMES WE PLAY
ACT - 92
25 December 1995
Copyright (C) 1994 Homer Wilson Smith
Redistribution rights granted for non commercial purposes.
Life is a game.
When people undertake to play a game, they design the playing
field, and the rules of play, they train in that play, and they
eventually invite the opposing team to come and play.
When people find themselves forced to play a game that they don't
want to play, rather than play the game, they will try to destroy the
game, or destroy the other side, particularly if they think the other
side is the one forcing them to play.
If the other side thinks that YOU are the one forcing them to play,
then they will take to playing the game of destroying you, which of
course puts you in a game you don't want to play so you will take to
trying to destroy them back.
In this way the game of playing against the opponent, becomes the
game of destroying the game and opponent.
It's not much of a foot ball game if one side takes out shotguns
and blasts away at the other side just as they kick off.
An analysis of games then would include an analysis of how the
various games we are playing have decayed down into the game of
destroying the game and the other side.
You know from LRH that games consist of Purposes, Barriers and
Freedoms in that order of importance.
But they also involve DESIGN, TRAINING, INVITATION, WELCOME, PLAY,
HALFTIME, and the after game HAND SHAKE.
You can take a look at any activity you are engaged in through out
the day and spot its various games aspects. This includes purposes,
barriers and freedoms, but also design, training, invitation, welcome,
play, half time and the ending handshake, all of which add up to
"putting the game there".
Life's games go well to the degree that both sides are putting it
there. The minute someone starts not putting it there, and trying to
put it not there, the game goes to hell and becomes the game of
destroying the game and the opposing team.
The side that is the most bent on destroying the game always loses,
because you can't destroy what you "aren't putting there".
The way you destroy something is to PUT IT THERE TWICE!
If people continue to not put the game there, the GAME wins, as
everyone is forced to play the game of destroying unwanted persisting
games forever.
The game persists solely because the players aren't putting it
there with design, training, invitation, welcome, play, half time and
handshake.
Thus the best they can do is play forever in an unwanted game,
which is the definition of hell.
That's how MEST wins. That's how Creators (thetans) become pieces
in the Creature's (MEST's) game.
So take a look at it folks, see where your life has sunk into
destroying games instead of playing games.
Assess for
Start of Game
Purposes
Barriers
Freedoms
Design
Rules
Training
Invitation
Welcome
Teams
Spectators
Concessions
Umpires
Announcers
Play
Half Time
Come Back
Win/Lose
Handshake
End of Game
Remember that the goal to WIN a game is secondary to and derives
from the goal to PLAY a game.
This IS the definition of Sportsmanship.
If you find a game where winning is more important than playing,
you will have found a game where getting rid of the game is more
important than playing the game.
That defines an Overt.
Homer
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith This file may be found at
homer@lightlink.com ftp.lightlink.com/pub/homer/act92.memo
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Wed Jul 28 12:00:05 EDT 2021
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/act92.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFhAX8GURT1lqxE3HERAp4aAJ4jW2U2EYXeveblRHnoTGxPubUepgCfTLcY
JghCEg1eWeoEqxEu7eZgen0=
=sYyS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Sunday, June 13, 2021
ADORE871 (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
FIX AND REPAIR
Clearing is a fix and repair job.
To the degree you are trying to fix and repair your own self and
your games across 8 dynamics, you will need to help fix and repair
others. And they will do the same. But then everyone gets back to
playing the game (libido across all 8 dynamics).
Fix and repair should about 10 percent of your total time.
Maybe an hour a day with yourself, or with another at $20 to
$50/hour.
Start sessions with:
What would be an ideal scene with your life, and what is the
furthest departure from that ideal scene in present time.
Write down all items.
Define To Be Responsible for, as
1.) Choosing to cause, this means taking responsibility for
2.) Adding one's cause into an already existing scene that one did
not cause, in order to make it better. This means taking responsibility
over.
3.) Taking responsibility for something 'someone else created'
as your own. At the top it is true, but game postulates later
make it seem like it isn't.
Spot times taking responsibility for or over things that came a
cropper, resulted in ruin, disaster, dismay, unintended betrayal and
regret.
Regretted responsibility is a whopper, as it denies responsibility
for taking responsibility!
Spot times one tried to duck the consequences of taking
responsibility by shunting or shifting responsibility to another as
cause.
Since everyone is responsible for everything done by anyone to
anybody, its not the saying that another did it that is wrong, it is
saying that he did it AND you DIDN'T DO IT.
Spot the times others didn't buy your attempted shift and the
responsibility came back to you as fault and guilt. The fault and guilt
are not about what you first DID, that other's might be on your case
about, but about your effort to shift cause to another and claim you
didn't do it.
Spot the times you then used a service facsimile to make yourself
sick, injured or disabled, to ameliorate the animosity of others towards
you and/or to exonerate yourself for having shifted blame.
Spot the times you finally felt sympathy for your tormentors as you
saw they weren't in such hot shape either.
Spot the moments of shock.
Spot pride levels before and after.
Spot desire and world view before the shock.
Spot desire and world view after the shock.
A being's life consists of desire driving it through time towards
basic goals.
The being has set up postulate packages to surprise him that cause
himself to fail.
This produces shock.
The shock is covered (hidden) before it happens with desire and
forward motion, and is covered after it happens with degraded views
(postulates) of existence and blocked motion, indecisions or ANDS, going
AND not going at the same time forever.
This creates the 'shock sandwich'.
Desire - Shock - View
Actually both desire and view exist before and after
the shock but in different conditions. So its more like:
Desire/View - Shock - Blocked Desire/Degraded View
Notice and reevaluate the pollution of postulates made during the
shock designed to 'handle' the desire and the shock in a way that didn't
handle it.
All case is dealing with life by not dealing.
All case is persisted by the effort to make an as-isness via a
not-isness.
As-isness causes true vanishment.
Not-isness causes an apparent vanishment which isn't.
A being can be knocked down to shock, but no lower, because at
shock he is back at timeless eternity again.
He can make three choices:
One is to go lower into catatonia and oblivion, that is handle the
desire and the shock by denying it, making nothing of it, shifting to
something else, some other goal, in other words Q&Aing with it. He
becomes a "what desire, what shock, what view?" case.
His view becomes smaller, more limited, more solid. His universe
does not get smaller, but he gets smaller in his universe, until
eventually it is running him rather than the other way around.
His universe may LOOK smaller to him, but its full of dark matter
covering all the things he no longer wishes to know went down.
Or two, he can climb back out of shock up through hysteria,
disaster and ruin to demand for improvement, help and hope.
Hope is playing the game again, hoping to win but willing to lose.
A being will generally not seek or play a game that he has no hope
of winning, unless his only goal is see how long he can remaining
standing.
That would probably be a last last-ditch game when all others were
gone or hopeless.
Three, he can go higher to author mode where he can end the game or
rewrite it.
Thus auditing addresses each moment of desire-shock-view, they are
like nails in his time track, and removes them one by one. As each one
is addressed, go earlier similar until basic on the chain. Also go
future similar, as sorrow is for the future, not the past.
Sorrow = loss of futures.
Sorrow = will lose.
You are looking for moments of deep injury, deep loss, deep
emotion, where pride, self confidence, self trust, self faith, self
love, self interest, self loyalty were broken and were not healed and
recovered in the retelling.
No longer in love with responsibility.
No longer in love with love.
He will no longer associate responsibility with able control, and
the KRC triangle will go to hell.
Responsibility without able control is the exact opposite of what a
Sovereign being is.
Once he gets the idea that he can be responsible but not have
control of what he has created or others are creating, then taking
responsibility for anything becomes anathema to him, and down the tubes
he goes.
You will need to have the preclear REWRITE each incident to
delineate what he should have done after the shock (not to avoid it), to
have healed it on the spot.
You will need to run all 5 flows, times he was shocked, times he
shocked others, times others shocked him, times others shocked others,
times he shocked himself, times others shocked themselves.
Shocks don't have to be caused by BEINGS, they can be caused by the
mere existence of things as they are. But since all things created,
were created by a being, then it does eventually come back to who done
it, which was him as part of the omni sovereign multi being US.
The basics are all flow 0, what he did to himself.
But the basics are buried under eons of who did what to whom.
First awareness of death will show up, and first invalidations of
depth of affinity and feeling with show up.
Basic feelings are exhilaration, courage, joy, love, monotony,
antagonism, anger, fear, despair, terror, numb, sorrow and apathy.
Antagonism is batting back at attacks.
Anger/Hate is holding attacks still and trying to destroy them.
Fear is trying to survive by running away.
Despair is the computation that you can't run fast enough.
Terror is waiting, which quickly becomes numb.
Sorrow is the cry of love lost.
Apathy is given up.
DEPTH is the key word here. We aren't running dry river beds, we
are running bottomless oceanic flows.
If your preclear picks up a dry pebble and hands it to you as the
upset of his life because he stubbed his toe on it, then go out and find
yourself an honest preclear.
If he hands you the limp body of a cat newly killed by a car in the
night, then perhaps you will make some headway.
Remember in the end though, what is wrong with your preclear is
mostly flow 0, what he caused to himself, which consist mostly of
created views (realities) of his own nature and the nature of the
AllThatIs that he conceives crush out his own desires and in the
conception of it, they do.
You might ask why a being would do this to himself, the final
answer probably comes back to a sense of humor, if it doesn't then we
all might as well throw in the towel now.
We have already done that, and that's why we are all still here
now.
"The way to happiness is a true confession."
"Not one yet gleaned..." - Electra
Those words are not meant to be depressing, but the next time you
think you have told all, and yet feel like a dry river bed, harken to
those words for comfort.
The oceans of the soul are made of sorrow and laughter.
The preclear will run when he first turned against life, but
decided to suffer it anyhow.
Shocks are moments of debonding with people, places and things,
particularly desires and goals and ABILITIES.
You want first moments of debonding with anything and everything
including and especially self on all dynamics.
People fall into these chains easily, and will run almost without
help, and once they 'get it', they can handle future restims on their
own without an auditor.
Doesn't matter if all chains are flattened in session, preclears
will flatten unflat chains during next restim once they see where the
game of catatonia and oblivion get them.
Sorrow is love, no sorrow means no love.
Dry eyed sorrow never heals, because suppressing expression of
sorrow is suppressing expression of love.
If the preclear isn't SCREAMING, he isn't running.
One who can not cry no longer dares to love.
Once enough sorrow starts to come off a case, pains will turn on,
they can be alarming, they run out just like anything else.
Eventually laughter will turn on big time and alternate between
sorrow and laughter.
The pain in his side will go from being 'lumbosis', to he's
laughing so hard he can't breath.
Excess of joy weeps, excess of sorrow laughs.
Long term E/P is unfathomable composure, equanimity and peace.
Flinch and cringe will be inconceivable to him, and he will have a
hard time bringing them about to persist for any amount of time.
One can afford to love the cat again, and anyone else for that
matter, no matter what fair chosen fate awaits them.
But it comes only with presence, which is the ability to confront
and take responsibility for ANYTHING done by anybody to anybody, without
ducking into shunting responsibility or the service facsimile tar pit
with its attendant sympathies and ruins of ability.
Homer
- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011, Bob1357 wrote:
> So,
>
> Good (Consciousness) and evil (ego) (God and Devil) with a "thinking"
> buffer.
> The trinity is now seen.
> Non dualism says stop thinking ..............close the buffer.
> Ummm... No..... .that's to easy ..............it will turn you into a
> bumbling fool.
> Most others (religions)......... well .......... bullshit.
> Homer? ..... ya there? .... Talked with a few times on the phone in
> despair.
> You gave me some great advice.
> Now I have only a few choice friends, zero employees and making more
> money than I ever have before.
> Good for me.
> I'm not here to pull everyone out of ignorance right.
> I'm here for me.
> It's not my job to fix others right?
> Then why does it feel so fucked up?
> Yes........ I used the word feel.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clear-L mailing list
> Clear-L@mailman.lightlink.com
> http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/clear-l
>
Mon Jun 27 20:06:29 EDT 2011
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Thu May 10 12:00:02 EDT 2018
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore871.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFa9GyCURT1lqxE3HERAiUYAJ980Bv+jO9OBt6dVM1pZwN3kaWdgQCeP3/I
CvPnbRnK5IY8PpHZhTrMgnU=
=f8Qt
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Thu May 10 13:31:42 EDT 2018
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sun Jun 13 12:00:09 EDT 2021
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore871.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFgxiuKURT1lqxE3HERAv8pAJ9VVDfa1AEhV122i6Bgh5FSF2yvVgCgt/r4
2VdgQ8lHEgrChwMpoTal43w=
=Evoz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
FIX AND REPAIR
Clearing is a fix and repair job.
To the degree you are trying to fix and repair your own self and
your games across 8 dynamics, you will need to help fix and repair
others. And they will do the same. But then everyone gets back to
playing the game (libido across all 8 dynamics).
Fix and repair should about 10 percent of your total time.
Maybe an hour a day with yourself, or with another at $20 to
$50/hour.
Start sessions with:
What would be an ideal scene with your life, and what is the
furthest departure from that ideal scene in present time.
Write down all items.
Define To Be Responsible for, as
1.) Choosing to cause, this means taking responsibility for
2.) Adding one's cause into an already existing scene that one did
not cause, in order to make it better. This means taking responsibility
over.
3.) Taking responsibility for something 'someone else created'
as your own. At the top it is true, but game postulates later
make it seem like it isn't.
Spot times taking responsibility for or over things that came a
cropper, resulted in ruin, disaster, dismay, unintended betrayal and
regret.
Regretted responsibility is a whopper, as it denies responsibility
for taking responsibility!
Spot times one tried to duck the consequences of taking
responsibility by shunting or shifting responsibility to another as
cause.
Since everyone is responsible for everything done by anyone to
anybody, its not the saying that another did it that is wrong, it is
saying that he did it AND you DIDN'T DO IT.
Spot the times others didn't buy your attempted shift and the
responsibility came back to you as fault and guilt. The fault and guilt
are not about what you first DID, that other's might be on your case
about, but about your effort to shift cause to another and claim you
didn't do it.
Spot the times you then used a service facsimile to make yourself
sick, injured or disabled, to ameliorate the animosity of others towards
you and/or to exonerate yourself for having shifted blame.
Spot the times you finally felt sympathy for your tormentors as you
saw they weren't in such hot shape either.
Spot the moments of shock.
Spot pride levels before and after.
Spot desire and world view before the shock.
Spot desire and world view after the shock.
A being's life consists of desire driving it through time towards
basic goals.
The being has set up postulate packages to surprise him that cause
himself to fail.
This produces shock.
The shock is covered (hidden) before it happens with desire and
forward motion, and is covered after it happens with degraded views
(postulates) of existence and blocked motion, indecisions or ANDS, going
AND not going at the same time forever.
This creates the 'shock sandwich'.
Desire - Shock - View
Actually both desire and view exist before and after
the shock but in different conditions. So its more like:
Desire/View - Shock - Blocked Desire/Degraded View
Notice and reevaluate the pollution of postulates made during the
shock designed to 'handle' the desire and the shock in a way that didn't
handle it.
All case is dealing with life by not dealing.
All case is persisted by the effort to make an as-isness via a
not-isness.
As-isness causes true vanishment.
Not-isness causes an apparent vanishment which isn't.
A being can be knocked down to shock, but no lower, because at
shock he is back at timeless eternity again.
He can make three choices:
One is to go lower into catatonia and oblivion, that is handle the
desire and the shock by denying it, making nothing of it, shifting to
something else, some other goal, in other words Q&Aing with it. He
becomes a "what desire, what shock, what view?" case.
His view becomes smaller, more limited, more solid. His universe
does not get smaller, but he gets smaller in his universe, until
eventually it is running him rather than the other way around.
His universe may LOOK smaller to him, but its full of dark matter
covering all the things he no longer wishes to know went down.
Or two, he can climb back out of shock up through hysteria,
disaster and ruin to demand for improvement, help and hope.
Hope is playing the game again, hoping to win but willing to lose.
A being will generally not seek or play a game that he has no hope
of winning, unless his only goal is see how long he can remaining
standing.
That would probably be a last last-ditch game when all others were
gone or hopeless.
Three, he can go higher to author mode where he can end the game or
rewrite it.
Thus auditing addresses each moment of desire-shock-view, they are
like nails in his time track, and removes them one by one. As each one
is addressed, go earlier similar until basic on the chain. Also go
future similar, as sorrow is for the future, not the past.
Sorrow = loss of futures.
Sorrow = will lose.
You are looking for moments of deep injury, deep loss, deep
emotion, where pride, self confidence, self trust, self faith, self
love, self interest, self loyalty were broken and were not healed and
recovered in the retelling.
No longer in love with responsibility.
No longer in love with love.
He will no longer associate responsibility with able control, and
the KRC triangle will go to hell.
Responsibility without able control is the exact opposite of what a
Sovereign being is.
Once he gets the idea that he can be responsible but not have
control of what he has created or others are creating, then taking
responsibility for anything becomes anathema to him, and down the tubes
he goes.
You will need to have the preclear REWRITE each incident to
delineate what he should have done after the shock (not to avoid it), to
have healed it on the spot.
You will need to run all 5 flows, times he was shocked, times he
shocked others, times others shocked him, times others shocked others,
times he shocked himself, times others shocked themselves.
Shocks don't have to be caused by BEINGS, they can be caused by the
mere existence of things as they are. But since all things created,
were created by a being, then it does eventually come back to who done
it, which was him as part of the omni sovereign multi being US.
The basics are all flow 0, what he did to himself.
But the basics are buried under eons of who did what to whom.
First awareness of death will show up, and first invalidations of
depth of affinity and feeling with show up.
Basic feelings are exhilaration, courage, joy, love, monotony,
antagonism, anger, fear, despair, terror, numb, sorrow and apathy.
Antagonism is batting back at attacks.
Anger/Hate is holding attacks still and trying to destroy them.
Fear is trying to survive by running away.
Despair is the computation that you can't run fast enough.
Terror is waiting, which quickly becomes numb.
Sorrow is the cry of love lost.
Apathy is given up.
DEPTH is the key word here. We aren't running dry river beds, we
are running bottomless oceanic flows.
If your preclear picks up a dry pebble and hands it to you as the
upset of his life because he stubbed his toe on it, then go out and find
yourself an honest preclear.
If he hands you the limp body of a cat newly killed by a car in the
night, then perhaps you will make some headway.
Remember in the end though, what is wrong with your preclear is
mostly flow 0, what he caused to himself, which consist mostly of
created views (realities) of his own nature and the nature of the
AllThatIs that he conceives crush out his own desires and in the
conception of it, they do.
You might ask why a being would do this to himself, the final
answer probably comes back to a sense of humor, if it doesn't then we
all might as well throw in the towel now.
We have already done that, and that's why we are all still here
now.
"The way to happiness is a true confession."
"Not one yet gleaned..." - Electra
Those words are not meant to be depressing, but the next time you
think you have told all, and yet feel like a dry river bed, harken to
those words for comfort.
The oceans of the soul are made of sorrow and laughter.
The preclear will run when he first turned against life, but
decided to suffer it anyhow.
Shocks are moments of debonding with people, places and things,
particularly desires and goals and ABILITIES.
You want first moments of debonding with anything and everything
including and especially self on all dynamics.
People fall into these chains easily, and will run almost without
help, and once they 'get it', they can handle future restims on their
own without an auditor.
Doesn't matter if all chains are flattened in session, preclears
will flatten unflat chains during next restim once they see where the
game of catatonia and oblivion get them.
Sorrow is love, no sorrow means no love.
Dry eyed sorrow never heals, because suppressing expression of
sorrow is suppressing expression of love.
If the preclear isn't SCREAMING, he isn't running.
One who can not cry no longer dares to love.
Once enough sorrow starts to come off a case, pains will turn on,
they can be alarming, they run out just like anything else.
Eventually laughter will turn on big time and alternate between
sorrow and laughter.
The pain in his side will go from being 'lumbosis', to he's
laughing so hard he can't breath.
Excess of joy weeps, excess of sorrow laughs.
Long term E/P is unfathomable composure, equanimity and peace.
Flinch and cringe will be inconceivable to him, and he will have a
hard time bringing them about to persist for any amount of time.
One can afford to love the cat again, and anyone else for that
matter, no matter what fair chosen fate awaits them.
But it comes only with presence, which is the ability to confront
and take responsibility for ANYTHING done by anybody to anybody, without
ducking into shunting responsibility or the service facsimile tar pit
with its attendant sympathies and ruins of ability.
Homer
- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011, Bob1357 wrote:
> So,
>
> Good (Consciousness) and evil (ego) (God and Devil) with a "thinking"
> buffer.
> The trinity is now seen.
> Non dualism says stop thinking ..............close the buffer.
> Ummm... No..... .that's to easy ..............it will turn you into a
> bumbling fool.
> Most others (religions)......... well .......... bullshit.
> Homer? ..... ya there? .... Talked with a few times on the phone in
> despair.
> You gave me some great advice.
> Now I have only a few choice friends, zero employees and making more
> money than I ever have before.
> Good for me.
> I'm not here to pull everyone out of ignorance right.
> I'm here for me.
> It's not my job to fix others right?
> Then why does it feel so fucked up?
> Yes........ I used the word feel.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clear-L mailing list
> Clear-L@mailman.lightlink.com
> http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/clear-l
>
Mon Jun 27 20:06:29 EDT 2011
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Thu May 10 12:00:02 EDT 2018
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore871.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFa9GyCURT1lqxE3HERAiUYAJ980Bv+jO9OBt6dVM1pZwN3kaWdgQCeP3/I
CvPnbRnK5IY8PpHZhTrMgnU=
=f8Qt
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Thu May 10 13:31:42 EDT 2018
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sun Jun 13 12:00:09 EDT 2021
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore871.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFgxiuKURT1lqxE3HERAv8pAJ9VVDfa1AEhV122i6Bgh5FSF2yvVgCgt/r4
2VdgQ8lHEgrChwMpoTal43w=
=Evoz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)