Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
DESIRE AND BELIEF
A being is something on the order of a total knowingness.
This doesn't mean that he knows everything, or everything that
everyone else has ever created or ever will.
For example he doesn't necessarily know all the digits of PI.
However he may or may not know all the digits of PI that have ever
been computed in some particular universe.
But mostly being a total knowingness means he is quite capable
without further education, of knowing and not knowing things into and
out of existence, and basically everything he does is made of knowing
and unknowing of one kind or another. In the physical universe this
translates into cause as control, start, change and stop.
Total knowingness then means there is nothing more than knowing to
a being's abilities.
This leads to a rather odd aberration which is his need to
believe that he knows everything necessary to know, regardless of how
unpleasant a crock of hell bound bull it is, exceeds his need to believe
something desirable.
He will say 'Thank you Lord for giving me the truth, even though
all my star bellied sneech friends are all going to hell forever, at
least I, without the star belly, am going to heaven, thank you for
that!'
Yet take this same guy and put him into session and run 'How do you
feel about that belief?' and see what happens.
At first he will lie to you, he can't afford to admit discord with
the word of God, his God is a mean God and will send him to hell along
with all his star bellied sneech friends for doubt of canon, which is
heresy.
This guy is inaccessible, a lie factory, totally out of contact
with his own DESIRE.
You might as well run,
"Well if YOU were the Creator, how would YOU have created things?"
Oh that's a dangerous one, why bother thinking about our desire,
what possible relevance can desire have to the what is?
That's a SERIOUS disconnect of responsibility for condition,
don't you see?
The primary difference between self blame and taking responsibility
is desire. The responsible person considers he desired what he created,
even if he now no longer wants it or regrets it, the self blamer
doesn't. He hates himself for creating what he didn't want.
But in any case to the low toned, desire is at best a failing where
it agrees with the AllThatIs, and an outright sin where it disagrees.
So this guy is toast, he lives and breaths and teaches a detested
conception of the cosmic all, yet tries very hard to be 'good' lest he
go to hell forever at the hands of a seriously vile and deranged God.
"God loves you so much he created hell forever in case you
don't love him back."
Teaching little kids about hell forever is actually a form of child
abuse, but the psychotic parent does it for the child's own good, and
his own. If parent doesn't, the child might end up in hell and God will
surely take the parent to task for allowing that to happen through mere
lack of educating the child properly.
So we have a very sick society, people are BELOW knowing what they
desire any more and they are TERRIFIED crazy to find out.
THEY DESIRE TO NOT KNOW WHAT THEY DESIRE.
That is inverted desire (interest) on the Pre-Havingness Scale.
Something or someone might take exception to what they want, and
that is massive PTSness.
But how can a being get so low toned that he will sell his own
desire down the river just to believe that he has all the answers?
That's because a being can not stand ENFORCED NOT KNOWING.
A being is basically a total knowingness but at the top of the tone
scale, at native state, there is nothing to know, just resident ability
to know and not know.
So fair chosen not knowing is top scale, and ALL ABERRATION is
enforced basic truth.
Enforced not knowing.
So when the being finds himself in a universe where he has no clue
where he came from, and no rememberance at all of choosing his present
condition, and UNABLE TO KNOW, he will do anything, include sell his
self, desire and integrity along with everyone else's too, right down
the river in order to believe that he knows again, even if his knowing
is the most horrible nightmare alive.
Nightmares are basically unproud knowledge, sought after because
they self cast from horror, and they allow the being to stop the search
for knowing and 'get on with his dea... er life.'
Self casting from horror means the idea causes horror and the
horror is used as evidence that the idea is true.
Get the idea you are going to die one day for good along with
everyone else, and watch it self cast until you can do it at will and
will never fall for it again.
Thus you have most of the planet believing that people go to hell
forever simply for having a star on their belly, while 'chosen' people
do not.
This view is SO HORRIBLE that it exceeds even the imagination of
the star bellied people that anyone could ever believe it unless it were
somehow true, and so you find some of the star bellies wanting to
convert to the non star belly's nightmare.
God won't send them to hell if they are right, will He?
A little laser surgery will remove the star they hope.
The issue here is DESIRE.
People believe they don't have what they desire, but they have lost
sight that they desired to not have what they desire. And that loss of
sight they also desired.
So recovering for a person WHAT HE DESIRES in the way of an
operating AllThatIs, goes a long ways towards clearing a person.
He will go through a phase of coming back into contact with what he
really desires, but still suffer the self casting doubt that he can have
it.
These are the Qualms, otherwise known as 'too good to be true'.
Get him through it, not know is better than selling yourself and
everyone else you touch down the river out of cowardice for the
momentary relief of lies and illusion of knowing it all.
Hell is 'well at least *I* go to heaven forever'.
And guess what, he will be able to make friends again, oh will he
be able to make friends again, with EVERYONE.
He will FEEL, he will BOND, he will afford intimacy again.
Even with people who think he is going to hell forever for making
friends with everyone.
Homer
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Sun Aug 5 22:04:46 EDT 2007
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Monday, March 25, 2013
Friday, March 22, 2013
HELP RUNDOWN
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Long, but its a full rundown...
((My comments in double parentheses - Homer))
HELP
EXM - 38
Copyright (C) 1992 A Voice of the Free Zone (Electra)
Redistribution rights granted for non commercial purposes.
In the 1960's, LRH made a number of seminal discoveries on the
subject of Help. Help, Control, Communication and Interest to be
specific. These later became the Pre-Havingness Scale because a being
had to come up through Help, Control, Communication and Interest before
he could HAVE anything.
He found that beings decayed down through these levels to the lower
levels of the tone scale. They tried to have things by being interested
in them. When that failed they tried to get them by communicating about
them. When that failed they tried to use control to get their way.
When that failed they would indulge in getting help and helping others.
And when that failed they started in on committing overt acts and
developing withholds.
Thus a scale was born that went as follows.
1.) Havingness
2.) Interest
3.) Communication
4.) Control
5.) Help
6.) Overts
7.) Withholds
The overts came in to play when people tried to help others by
harming them, much as a parent tries to correct the disobedience of a
child by spanking them. When direct methods of helping fail to work,
then more indirect and finally violent methods are used. As these don't
work either, and as the intention is still good, to help, the being
finally regrets his actions and this produces the withholds.
Below this point of the scale the being goes sour.
The scale continues as follows.
8.) Importance
9.) Leave
10.) Protect
11.) Abandon
12.) Endure
13.) Inverted Help
14.) Inverted Control
15.) Inverted Communication
16.) Inverted Interest
17.) Obsessive Can't Have
18.) No Effect
The being descends this scale on misguided efforts to HAVE and get
others to have too. He is pursuing his Goals and aligning with others
that have the same or similar goals. In the process he gets opposed and
this is where the conflicts lie.
Once the being enters into the band of Overts, Harming to Help, or
even accidental overts, merely harming while helping, he quickly gets
lost in the mire and confusion of his own anger and regrets. This leads
to strenuous efforts to withhold, not only from doing bad things again,
but also from telling others what he has done and what he feels about
them.
((There is harming in order to help and there is helping in order
to harm. Harming to help is like spanking a child, the intention is
still good, but one is using harm to warn or to help the child learn.
Helping to harm is betrayal and is a very different matter. This
is Inverted Help at the lower part of the scale.))
At this stage the being enters into a big IMPORTANCE about things.
Things are terribly important because he is caught in a total indecision
based upon his need to act and his fear of consequences.
The indecision is MUST ACT *AND* MUST NOT ACT.
In Scientology this is called a MAYBE.
((In Adore it's called an AND, trying to do two opposite things at
the same time.))
This is sort of a balancing point for the being, a turning point, a
fork in the road. He can decide to either go back up the scale or
further back down. He usually decides to go further down as this is his
safe solution to the problem he is in.
It is mainly a problem in self confidence, his willingness and
winningness in handling the efforts and counter efforts of life around
him without ruining his own goals and those of his friends. He gets
into a tizzy about it, every time he acts, he does something wrong, and
pretty soon the solution is to not act at all.
What he will do is leave. That is what a 'blow' is all about in
Scientology terminology, the being is so unsure of his own ability to
act properly that he will solve the mystery by leaving the area of
importance and let other beings handle it.
This is the mother who leaves her kids to a nanny or day care
center because she is worried she might not do the right thing. This is
the person who cannot speak for fear they might say the wrong thing.
This is the person who sits around all day long and does nothing
because they are just sure that if they do something it will turn out
disastrous.
The person still cares about what they are leaving behind, they
hope that by leaving, the problems they were trying to solve will be
better taken care of by other people still hanging around being
functional.
What the being finds though is that no matter how much they try to
leave their problems behind in other's hands, their problems always come
after them eventually, almost like they are tied to them with rubber
bands or strong rope.
The mother that leaves her child at a day care center because she
is sure they will 'do better by her child', finds out one day that the
care takers have been molesting her child in class and now things are
much worse than they were before.
Thus the problem comes back to the mother as she must now take the
child out of day care and back into her own hands. But she still feels
totally incompetent at doing right by the child. What she DOES feel
like she can do is PROTECT the child from further harm.
So rather than just continue on by being a good mother, which she
should have done in the first place, she will now proceed on a grand
crusade against child molestation, sex, men, anything at all that she
can blame for the harm done to her child. She is still not taking care
of the child or bringing it up properly, she is too busy PROTECTING her
child, probably to death.
The child will suffocate and become murderously mad at the mother
in such circumstances, for no child can grow in an atmosphere of
compulsive self serving over protection. The mother is incapable of
judging what is good for the child, and only wishes to make up for the
damage she allowed to occur before. Thus keeping the child locked up in
a closet and out of harms way seems like a good solution to her.
The child will be wishing murder off on everyone in sight by this
time. Many a serial killer was born this way.
Eventually the mother will see the error of her ways, the child
will hate her deeply, and probably become a behavioral problem of
magnitude. At this point the mother has another turning point, another
decision to make and usually they make the wrong one.
Recognizing her total failure not only to help the child grow up
properly but also to protect it from others and herself, she will give
up utterly and ABANDON the child. This is a more severe form of
leaving. In this case there is no thought of placing the child in good
care. She knows that any decision that she makes will be a wrong one,
so she leaves it up to fate to take care of the child. Thus she will
leave the child in a basket in a shopping center and never look back.
Many people are in this state with regard to their Basic Purposes.
They have abandoned them totally and now they move through life like a
tumble weed in the wind. No one is really benefiting from this sort of
behavior but almost everyone is doing it when it comes to their Eternal
Basic Purposes. People have become Mortal in their own minds because
they abandoned their Immortality long ago.
If perchance someone comes across the child in the shopping center
and calls the police and the mother is hunted down and brought back
together with the child she now enters a state of Endure. Or the man
who tried to run away from his wife but is captured and put in jail for
not paying his alimony payments. This is sort of a Can't Hide that
people get into when they try to escape their problems forever. Their
problems come after them and then they can't get away from them at all.
Now the mother has the State and her parents and the local police
all breathing down her neck about taking care of this child. So she
just closes her eyes and Endures. What she is enduring are the mistakes
she knows she will make and the enmity that she knows the child will
feel for her. She can't escape from hurting her own child, so she just
takes it. The child gets repeatedly hurt and she suffers her regret in
quiet sorrow.
It is at this point that a major shift takes place in the outlook
of the being stuck in their quandary. They can't get away from their
problem, they can't stop hurting those they love. Their only final
solution is to destroy the problem and those involved in it. This is
called inverted help. It is helping in order to harm.
The mother will pretend to be nice to the child, all the while
planning to kill it or drive it to suicide. The mother will take
destructive actions towards the child all in the name of help. She will
criticize the child, she will punish the child unfairly, she will make
the child hate her, she will berate the child, she will humiliate the
child, she will lie to the child, she will make sure the child is
useless and develops none of its potential. All for its own good. Her
intention is that the child die knowing that it is no longer wanted. In
her mind this is what she actually thinks is best for the child. She is
still trying to help the child by destroying it or getting it to destroy
itself.
Failing this, she will try to drive the child crazy with bad
control. She will use control over the child to guarantee that the
child is utterly unable to control anything, all physical, emotional,
mental and spiritual competency will vanish, and the child will come to
reject control of any kind for any reason. A being who can not or will
not well control their environment can not survive.
Failing this, the mother will try to destroy the child by
squelching its every communication. She will employ communication in
order to create a state of no communication in the child. She will take
the child's mind off what it is thinking about, she will interrupt the
child, she will refuse to communicate about anything important to the
child by talking only about endless inanities, and she will refuse to
let the child communicate about anything of importance at all and she
will force the child to communicate on endless wastelands of uselessness
and wasted opportunities. Sort of like homework. This is called
inverted communication. It means communicating with the intention of
creating a no communication. Relating on a not relating.
Failing this, the mother will fall into inverted interest. At this
stage she will show interest in things to take the child's attention off
of other things that the child is more interested in. She will force
the child to be interested in useless garbage and invalidate the child
for showing interest in anything that the mother did not show interest
in first. Thus by never showing interest in anything important, the
mother makes sure the child is never allowed to independently follow
their own goals.
Failing this, the mother goes into a state of obsessively not being
able to HAVE a good child and be a good mother. She will be
compulsively out of control and unable to execute any important or
functional activity in life with regard to raising a child.
If there is anything in life you have always wanted, but were
always totally unable to have, you should look to how you have fallen
down this scale to Obsessive Can't Have. It doesn't matter if it is
family, money, girls, power, freedom or art. It might even be good
Scientology auditing! If you can't have it, you are down around
Obsessive Can't Have on that subject. And you came down through all
those levels we have just been talking about.
Below Obsessive Can't Have is No Effect. This means simply that no
matter what the being does, it has no effect at all on anything he ever
wanted to effect. He might as well not exist.
Most Churchie auditors feel this way about their own case.
Now the sad thing about all this is that a being can't even begin
to get out of this mess unless he has some inkling of HELP. He either
has to help himself, or he has to be helped. And what he needs is to
rehabilitate his ability to help others and himself towards whatever
original goal they might have had.
Near the top of the scale, help makes a lot of sense. But as help
starts to decay people find out that help means harm. This is because
they fail to help, at first totally unintentionally. They teach their
kid how to walk and it falls down the stairs and breaks its neck. The
next kid they have, they refuse to help it learn to walk.
Have you ever hurt someone you were trying to help?
Have you ever been hurt trying to help someone?
Has anyone ever hurt you while trying to help you?
Has anyone ever been hurt while trying to help you?
These things happen by accident at first. It makes people very
sour on the subject of help. But what it really does is it makes them
mad. THEN they start to help people BY hurting them. Little Johnny is
running around the house learning to walk and he gets spanked for being
a bad boy. He might get killed after all!
This leads to regret and confusion and inaction.
So help becomes associated with pain way at the top of this scale.
But then to make matters worse as the being falls down the scale he
finally ends up in inverted help where he is offering to help in order
to hurt!
Thus we start off helping and harming by accident. Then we harm in
order to help. Then we help in order to harm.
Thus people have help and harm thoroughly confused. At the very
bottom you have people who are totally sure that any help is offered
only as a covert effort to betray and destroy them. Such people will
not receive help and when they offer it they have only your destruction
in mind.
Higher up are people who are convinced there is no help at all
period. "Well we are made of meat, and there is no God, and Divinity is
just a word, and we are all going to die anyhow, and who cares, its all
too painful to dreg up, so leave me alone."
A little higher are people who are aware of help but who are chary
as hell of it because they KNOW that help is dangerous. 'Well I know
the mind can be fixed, but I might die if you play around in it and you
don't know what you are doing, and I've got five kids and a wife and a
job to hold down and I can't afford to go to pieces right now, and
besides what would the neighbors think, and so you had better leave it
alone for now, I'll get auditing later...'
Above that are people who know there is help and who want help
desperately and who want to help just as desperately but who have no
idea where to find help. These kind walk into Scientology like a man in
a dessert walks into a sea of fresh water.
But to keep them there the first thing you have to do is run out
all the charge they have on HELP as thoroughly as you can or they won't
stay. Every erg of charge you can find in their banks on the subject of
help must be released, because Scientology is about HELP, and if they
have any Bank on the subject of help, they will turn Scientology into a
Bank operation and no one will ever go clear.
They will also miss the people who are down at inverted help,
helping to harm, who will walk into the Church and get themselves
elected to high level management positions.
Once you clear help, then you go on to clear control,
communication, and interest. At which point they will be able to HAVE
again. It's a very OT state. It was no small thing this descent into
trouble.
What they can HAVE by the way is their own Immortality once again.
The E/P of Havingness is "At Peace with one's own Immortality."
((Probably should say Eternality. Immortalities are dangerous
hells.))
One clears the level by getting all the charge off the subject.
Charge is caused by failures of any kind. Thus locating the desires and
failures to help, control, communicate and be interested in things will
run out most of the being's Bank. Forever. Or at least until he should
so choose to indulge in ludicrous demise again.
This bulletin is about clearing HELP because everyone you meet will
need to have help cleared on them first before you can touch anything
else on their case. You are HELPING them after all, right? If help
isn't clear on them, they will just play games with you at your expense
and theirs too.
If they are below help, they won't even let you audit them so the
point it moot. They will however try to join the Church in order to
Leave, Protect, Abandon, Endure or Destroy what ever it is they can't
handle in life. But they won't allow you to audit them, or they will
turn auditing into a ritual so that no confession is gleaned and the
truth is never found. And of course they will never get better.
In this way the Church can become a sanctuary for losers. So you
had better have help cleaned up in yourself so that you can spot the
loser that walks in the front door. If you don't, they WILL become your
managers.
It's not hard to spot them. They don't want you to audit help.
So the following processes are designed to clear the hell out of
help in a being. You can run them on another or even yourself. It
helps to have an E-meter, but just understanding this material will go a
long way to breaking your mind open to freedom and ability to help
again.
You know anyone who is really crazy, or depressed or having a hard
time of it in life, is just fouled up on this subject of help, even if
it's only just helping themselves. Remember they lived a whole life
around people who were also fouled up on help. So this stuff can work
miracles on a being. It helps though if they are in the market for
miracles. So don't waste your time with total losers. You've got
plenty of people to help who are still able to want to be helped. We
will get everyone someday.
So help falls into a number of categories.
Flow 1: Another helping you.
Flow 2: You helping another.
Flow 3: Others helping others.
Flow 4: You helping yourself.
Flow 5: Another helping themselves.
However there is an added complexity here which is called the
KUCDEINR Scale. It goes,
Source of
Cause of
Known (K)
Unknown (U)
Curious about (C)
Desire (D)
Enforce (E)
Inhibit (I)
No (N)
Refused (R)
Withheld
It delineates the cycle of desire and failure on any subject of
importance to a thetan. At first he is source of the thing. Then he
falls down to creating it or causing it. Then he plays a game with
himself of not having it and trying to get it. At this point he is
curious about it. Then he falls to desiring it strongly. When this
fails to accomplish what he wants he will take to enforcing it, or using
force to get his way. This failing he will inhibit the thing, using
force to NOT have it, NOT want it, NOT care about it, and NOT let others
have or want it or care about it either. Eventually he falls down to NO
recognition of the thing at all. It just isn't there for him as a
problem or a desire or a failure of any kind. Later he will refuse the
thing even if it is offered to him free of charge.
Thus a being goes from HAVING down through PLAYING TO GET, to
REFUSING TO HAVE at the bottom. It's just another way of looking at the
Pre-Havingness scale itself.
Help is something you can give and receive. It's also something
you can be curious about, desire, enforce, inhibit, deny and refuse.
The dividing point here is enforce and inhibit. So we would want a set
of processes that covered this entire area rather thoroughly.
This would include all possible combinations of enforcing and
inhibiting, giving and receiving help. Of course you can include any
other flows that interest you and what I have laid out below is just
what I have found workable for myself.
A very general run can be made as follows:
Flow 1: Another helping you.
1.) How has another helped you?
2.) How has another not helped you?
3.) How has another tried to help you and failed?
4.) How has another tried to not help you and failed?
5.) How has another forced help on you?
6.) How has another refused to help you?
7.) How have you forced another to help you?
8.) How have you refused another's help?
Flow 2: You helping another.
1.) How have you helped another?
2.) How have you not helped another?
3.) How have you tried to help another and failed?
4.) How have you tried to not help another and failed?
5.) How have you forced help on another?
6.) How have you refused help to another?
7.) How has another forced you to help them?
8.) How has another refused your help?
Flow 3: Others helping others.
1.) How have others helped others?
2.) How have others not helped others?
3.) How have others tried to help others and failed?
4.) How have others tried to not help others and failed?
5.) How have others forced help on others?
6.) How have others refused to help others?
7.) How have others forced others to help them?
8.) How have others refused other's help?
Flow 4: You helping yourself.
1.) How have you helped yourself?
2.) How have you not helped yourself?
3.) How have you tried to help yourself and failed?
4.) How have you tried to not help yourself and failed?
5.) How have you forced help on yourself?
6.) How have you refused help to yourself?
7.) How have you forced yourself to help yourself?
8.) How have you refused your own help?
Flow 5: Another helping themselves.
1.) How has another helped themselves?
2.) How has another not helped themselves?
3.) How has another tried to help themselves and failed?
4.) How has another tried to not help themselves and failed?
5.) How has another forced help on themselves?
6.) How has another refused help to themselves?
7.) How has another forced themselves to help themselves?
8.) How has another refused their own help?
The second and third questions have slightly different meanings.
For example the second question 'How has another not helped you?' merely
asks for what help did not take place. For example, 'Well my parents
did not sell crack cocaine to make money for me to go to college even
though it may have crossed their mind.'
The third question, 'How has another tried to help you and failed',
asks for those times of attempted help which failed. For example 'Well
my parents tried to take out a loan to pay for my college tuition, but
it was refused due to my father's lack of income.'
The order in which you run these questions is not critical, what
ever makes you or your pc the most happy. LRH says to run
How have you helped someone?
How have you not helped someone?
alternately for long runs.
You can run each question repeatedly until the pc has no more
answers on that question and then go on to the next one. Or you can
cycle through them. You can even run all 5 flows on each help sub
question before going on to the next help question. For example
Help question 1.
Flow 1. How has another helped you?
Flow 2. How have you helped another?
Flow 3. How have others helped others?
Flow 4. How have you helped yourself?
Flow 5. How have others helped themselves?
Help question 2.
Flow 1. How has another not helped you?
Flow 2. How have you not helped another?
etc.
You would then follow this with all 5 flows on each of the
remaining 8 help questions:.
1.) Help
2.) Not help
3.) Tried to help but failed.
4.) Tried to not help but failed.
5.) Forced help on
6.) Refused help to
7.) Force to help
8.) Help was refused (prevented from helping).
If the person is having a hard time coming up with answers to the
questions go on to the next question. If you have an E-meter you can
check the question after the pc says 'no more' and see if it still
reads. If it does, gently get the pc to look further. Don't push the
pc against his will though. Just go on. When you come back to that
question later there will be more uncovered for him to tell you.
Another thing you can do is break it down into the 4 planes of
existence for the pc. For example,
Flow 1, Help Question 1:
1.) How has another helped you on the physical plane?
2.) How has another helped you on the emotional plane?
3.) How has another helped you on the mental plane?
4.) How has another helped you on the spiritual plane?
The 4 planes of existence are a subset of the Scientology Know to
Mystery scale. The being is running at these many different vibrations
and as he fails in life tends to run at the lower vibrations more than
the higher ones. At the bottom he is rock.
KNOW TO MYSTERY SCALE
1.) NATIVE STATE SPIRITUAL
2.) KNOW |
3.) NOT KNOW | AS-ISNESS FORM
4.) KNOW ABOUT MENTAL ALTER-ISNESS SIGNIFICANCE
5.) LOOK | ISNESS PERSISTENCE
6.) EMOTE EMOTIONAL
7.) EFFORT PHYSICAL
8.) THINK |
9.) SYMBOLS |
10.) EAT |
11.) DEATH |
12.) SEX |
13.) MYSTERY |
14.) WAIT |
15.) UNCONSCIOUS | NOT-ISNESS
16.) UNKNOWABLE | FALSE KNOWING
NATIVE STATE. This is the Big Snooze or Sovereignty out the top of
the tone scale.
KNOW. This is the thetan waking up to a state of total ability
with nothing yet created except awareness of how to create and that he
can.
NOT KNOW. This is the creation of forms and things with out
significance. For example the thetan can make something that looks like
an ashtray, but has no use for it and does not consider it an ashtray.
It merely has the form of one.
In Scientology this is considered the state of an AS-ISNESS, the
state something is in when it was just created. It is claimed in
Scientology that AS-ISNESSes tend to vanish unless they are altered
quickly. Thus a persistence is created by altering an AS-ISNESS thereby
producing an ALTER-ISNESS.
KNOW ABOUT. Here the thetan assigns AFTER THE FACT OF THEIR
CREATION, significances to the forms he has created. He assigns
causation and uses to things, thus the ashtray comes to be considered
something that can and should be used to hold ashes. Significance is
always added to an object after the fact of it's creation.
The addition of a significance to a form is the act of altering
it's prime truth which is that it was just a form. Thus things which
have had significances added have been ALTER-ISed. This produces an IS-
NESS which is the persisting reality around you that you can look at.
((Everything you can see has a name and a use and where it came
from.))
LOOK. This is the level of sensory data of any kind. Visual color
form. It also includes sonic, tactile, and taste and smell along with
50 or so other peceptics outlined in Dianetics.
Anything that persists on it's own is an IS-NESS. It can be sensed
and felt and manipulated. You can stand back and watch it continue. An
IS-NESS consists of an AS-ISNESS altered by the addition of a
significance to it. Common significances that can be added to an object
are 1.) Who or what created it, 2.) When it was created and 3.) What it
can cause and what it is used for.
This altering of an AS-ISNESS produces a persistence of the created
form. In order to vanish the form for oneself and for everyone, one
would have to perceive the form again in it's pristine AS-IS state
without any significances added to it.
EMOTE. Emotion is used by the thetan as the causal bridge between
his mind and the action of his body. He uses emotion to MOVE the body.
When very low toned it looks like the thetan is moved by his emotions,
but higher toned the thetan CREATES emotion willfully and moves the body
with it. Each emotion from Enthusiasm down through Sorrow has it's use
and proper place. When the thetan loses his state of Clear and becomes
other-determined he can be made to feel these emotions against his will
and thus he becomes a 'sad' puppy.
When clear, the thetan creates and uses each tone as appropriate to
the situation. He does not run BECAUSE he is afraid, he CAUSES himself
to run BY being afraid. He doesn't run FROM fear, he runs WITH fear.
Same for Anger and Sorrow. He will try winning with each higher tone
first before he will try the next tone down.
The tone that wins for him becomes pretty. Thus there is beautiful
anger, beautiful fear and beautiful sorrow. Even beautiful apathy. Its
all a game of movement and effort.
EFFORT. This is the band of physical force that the thetan creates
in his body and the body creates in the physical universe. The main
purpose of effort and force is to move MATTER in order to change it's
ENERGY content.
THINKING. This is the use of mental effort to ask and answer
questions, to compute the future from data at hand. It is not the same
as THOUGHT which is a creative ability of the mind up around KNOW on
this scale.
If a person gets the idea of an elephant eating some hay, that's a
thought. If the person tries to compute how to escape the elephant
running towards him, that's thinking.
Thought is causal creative outflow of various things to effect you.
Thinking is trying to logically compute how those effects are going to
effect you and what you need to do to get what you want.
Thought is how you create problems. Thinking is how you try to
solve problems.
Thought is how you CREATE the game of effects. Thinking is how you
PLAY the game of effects.
SYMBOLS. A symbol is anything with mass, meaning and mobility. It
is made of mass, it has meaning (significance), and it has the ability
to be moved by an orientation point. The orientation point is the
source of symbols and their significances, and is the point from which
all symbols are created and/or located.
A thetan is natively an orientation point, but he eventually slides
down the tone scale to being a symbol. Thetans, as a symbol, often
orient themselves relative to their home, or their body, or their
parents or their planet, or God, or even the sun, etc. They consider
these symbols as bigger orientation points than they are. Such symbols
are called anchor points because they are used by the thetan to keep
space in place for him, and he moves around inside of that space
relative to his anchor points.
A thetan actually can not move as space is a projection from within
him. Space is an apparency and has no actual existence other than as a
perception. One perceives space in dreams, there is no space there
either.
The ultimate symbol of course is a human body, it has mass, meaning
and mobility. It defines it's existence and whereabouts relative to
others in the environment. As the thetan comes up tone towards clear he
exteriorizes from being a body by exteriorizing from his need to be a
symbol.
At this point he can take on his post as an orientation point again
and be the source of where other things come from and are. He becomes a
Creator again rather than a Creature. An orientation point does not
locate himself relative to anything else. He locates everything
relative to himself.
((To locate has two meanings, one causal, the other effect.
To Locate means causally, to place in space and time.
To Locate means as an effect, to find where something is in space
and time.))
The world is a dream, you have never really ever gone anywhere, so
this can be understood very easily.
EAT. At this level the being is involved in surviving as a symbol
by destroying other symbols, mainly by eating them. Because he can die
himself by being eaten, the next level down is DEATH.
DEATH. The result of being eaten and other forces.
SEX. In order to make up for the consequences of death and being
eaten, the being must propagate his race with sex. Sex is an effort to
continue on in spite of being eaten and death.
What is often missed about biology, is that it BENEFITS a species
to be eaten. The grass grows better because the herds graze on it and
poop on it. It would have been easy to develop into a poisonous entity,
but the grass that was tasty survived better. Thus being eaten is not a
loss of survival but a gain of survival. Being eaten was the BRIGHT
thing to do. Thus death HAD to be entered into the equation as a way to
survive. And so therefore did some form of procreation.
MYSTERY. At this point of the tone scale the being is in a quandry
and feels he is in mystery, or DON'T KNOW ABOUT. He has lost contact
with his own postulates, his own assignations of causation and
significance, and can no longer predict the environment. A being that
has been wrong too many times ends up in mystery.
WAIT. Below mystery is waiting. There is nothing else to do.
UNCONSCIOUSNESS. At this point the being starts to NOT-IS his
mystery. This means he makes it seem that the whole thing does not
exist. It goes unconscious on him. Thus he forms a Reactive Mind he
does not know is there and becomes a basher on the net. He also needs
an E-meter to help him recover everything that he has so carefully
buried.
This is below HIDING on the tone scale at BEING NOTHING.
UNKNOWABLE. Below hiding is CAN'T HIDE. The being has sort of
broken through the under side of UNCONSCIOUSNESS where he is no longer
able to go unconscious at will. What he knows in this state is that
basically things are unknowable and that he had nothing to do with it.
It is sort of a nightmare dream state about as far away from lucidity as
he can get. He figures that whatever he was in mystery about is
unknowable. Thus he falls into the race of human beings who think that
ultimate truth either does not exist or can not be known and that
certainly he had nothing to do with it or his present condition at the
bottom of the pit.
Below this he becomes a Senator.
By the way if the whole subject of help makes you sick, then you
are either above or below it on the Pre Have Scale, and you should find
your level and run that instead.
Your worst psychosomatic will be down at NO EFFECT. That is what
you wanted when you created it, right? An UNCURABILITY.
You will need to run these help processes on your pc's hottest
terminal pair. To find these terminals you can make a list using the E-
meter and run the following. The people which read the most and which
the pc is the most interested in will be his hottest terminals.
1.) Who do you want to help?
2.) Who do you not want to help?
3.) Who have you tried to help and failed?
4.) Who have you tried to not help and failed?
5.) Who have you forced help on?
6.) Who have you refused to help?
7.) Who has forced you to help them?
8.) Who has refused your help?
((Remember that classes of whos form a what. There will be mother
as a who, but MOTHERS/FEMALES/PARENTS as a what. Finding whos is
important, but finding the whats that the who represents is more
important. Then run help on the what, not the who.))
Once you find the terminal that the pc is the most bonkers on, you
can just see the emotion welling up in the pc, then run the help
questions with that terminal in the place of 'another'.
But if you really want to do this thoroughly, you should pick your
hottest terminal pair and run it through all 8 flows of forgetfulness
listed below, rather than the 5 flows of Standard Scientology. Each of
the 8 flows has 8 questions, so that's 64 questions all told.
You don't have to run this like a robot, going over each flow
exactly as written out. If you have an E-meter, have your pc read this
bulletin from beginning to end and note the reads and changes of needle
characteristics. If you pc is down at Leave or Endure he will read on
those levels and not on Help. If he is really at help he will be all
smiles and ready to go with blazing stories to tell you as he gets the
charge off his life of misadventure and co adventure. Help is mainly a
story of co adventure, of bonding together for a common good, and then
failing or being cruel to the agreements you made with each other.
Running this stuff out from beginning to end produces a civilized
being who can be trusted again, and more importantly someone who can
trust themselves all the way up and down the line, and help others to
the same state.
((They can co operate again on a grand scale with others across all
8 dynamics of action, self, family, communities/groups, mankind, life
forms, MEST, spirits and The Infinite.))
In running these processes, a person will quickly cognite that a
hefty portion of his case stems from his efforts to force others to help
him, and to prevent others from forcing him to help them. It takes a
sick Parent to raise a sick Child. Sick Children usually go on to being
sick Parents. Rarely is the lesson learned. And sometimes even when
they have good Parents, some people go on to be sick Parents anyhow.
Just sort of an ingrained cussedness I guess.
Your pc may also cognite that he is making himself sick IN ORDER TO
HELP others, as looney as that might sound. He will often be found to
have the very ailments of those he loved, helped and harmed. He is
trying to help them out of it by having it himself. Watch out if those
loved ones are dead, he won't want to give up his maladies easily.
((Expect LOVE to be at the root of aberrations, but not
rationality.))
Remember you want terminal PAIRS for this last set of processes.
If the guy's mother comes up as his hottest terminal, find out if
it's really 'a mother' that is bugging him, or if it's 'a woman' or 'a
female body' or 'a teacher'. It may be the person he calls his mother
that is hot, but it may not be her identity AS A MOTHER that is hot, it
may be her identity as 'a woman' or even 'a lover'. Get it?
If it turns out to be some teacher in school, again find out what
the actual identity is that is hot on that person. Then find out what
the pc's identity was in the conflict with that other person. For
example if it's 'a teacher', then was the pc 'a student'?
The terminal is the WHO, the identity is the WHAT the who was
being.
A terminal is a person or thing, an identity is a beingness.
((Each who is a unique person, each what is a class of many people.
There was only one Mrs. Jones, but many teachers.))
Once you have the terminal pairs and the correct identities that go
with them, run your pc on the following 64 processes until there is no
charge left, or he attains a serious win on all four planes, physical,
emotional, mental and spiritual.
64 WAY HELP ON TERMINAL PAIRS.
Using Parent and Child identities as example.
Flow 1: You helping a Child as a Parent in a past life.
How have you helped a Child as a Parent in a past life?
How have you not helped a Child as a Parent in a past life?
How have you tried to help a Child and failed as a Parent in a past
life?
How have you tried to not help a Child and failed as a Parent in a past
life?
How have you forced help on a Child as a Parent in a past life?
How have you refused to help a Child as a Parent in a past life?
How has a Child forced you to help them as a Parent in a past life?
How has a Child refused your help as a Parent in a past life?
Flow 2: A Parent helping you as a Child in this life.
How has a Parent helped you as a Child in this life?
How has a Parent not helped you as a Child in this life?
How has a Parent tried to help you as a Child and failed in this life?
How has a Parent tried to not help you as a Child and failed in this
life?
How has a Parent forced help on you as a Child in this life?
How has a Parent refused to help you as a Child in this life?
How have you forced a Parent to help you as a Child in this life?
How have you refused the help of a Parent as a Child in this life?
Flow 3: A Child helping you as a Parent in a past life.
How has a Child helped you as a Parent in a past life?
How has a Child not helped you as a Parent in a past life?
How has a Child tried to help you as a Parent and failed in a past life?
How has a Child tried to not help you as a Parent and failed in a past
life?
How has a Child forced help on you as a Parent in a past life?
How has a Child refused to help you as a Parent in a past life?
How have you forced a Child to help you as a Parent in a past life?
How have you refused the help of a Child as a Parent in a past life?
Flow 4: You helping a Parent as a Child in this life.
How have you helped a Parent as a Child in this life?
How have you not helped a Parent as a Child in this life?
How have you tried to help a Parent and failed as a Child in this life?
How have you tried to not help a Parent and failed as a Child in this
life?
How have you forced help on a Parent as a Child in this life?
How have you refused to help a Parent as a Child in this life?
How has a Parent forced you to help them as a Child in this life?
How has a Parent refused your help as a Child in this life?
Flow 5: Another Parent helping another Child in any life.
How has another Parent helped another Child in any life?
How has another Parent not helped another Child in any life?
How has another Parent tried to help another Child and failed in any
life?
How has another Parent tried to not help another Child and failed in any
life?
How has another Parent forced help on another Child in any life?
How has another Parent refused help to another Child in any life?
How has another Child forced another Parent to help them in any life?
How has another Child refused help from another Parent in any life?
Flow 6: Another Child helping another Parent in any life.
How has another Child helped another Parent in any life?
How has another Child not helped another Parent in any life?
How has another Child tried to help another Parent and failed in any
life?
How has another Child tried to not help another Parent and failed in any
life?
How has another Child forced help on another Parent in any life?
How has another Child refused help to another Parent in any life?
How has another Parent forced another Child to help them in any life?
How has another Parent refused help from another Child in any life?
Flow 7: You helping yourself as a Parent in a past life.
How have you helped yourself as a Parent in a past life?
How have you not helped yourself as a Parent in a past life?
How have you tried to help yourself and failed as a Parent in a past
life?
How have you tried to not help yourself and failed as a Parent in a past
life?
How have you forced help on yourself as a Parent in a past life?
How have you refused help to yourself as a Parent in a past life?
How have you forced yourself to help yourself as a Parent in a past
life?
How have you refused help from yourself as a Parent in a past life?
Flow 8: You helping yourself as a Child in this life.
How have you helped yourself as a Child in this life?
How have you not helped yourself as a Child in this life?
How have you tried to help yourself and failed as a Child in this life?
How have you tried to not help yourself and failed as a Child in this
life?
How have you forced help on yourself as a Child in this life?
How have you refused help to yourself as a Child in this life?
How have you forced yourself to help yourself as a Child in this
life?
How have you refused help from yourself as a Child in this life?
Electra
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith This file may be found at
homer@rahul.net ftp.rahul.net/pub/homer/act/EXM38.MEMO
Posted to usenet newsgroup: alt.clearing.technology
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Long, but its a full rundown...
((My comments in double parentheses - Homer))
HELP
EXM - 38
Copyright (C) 1992 A Voice of the Free Zone (Electra)
Redistribution rights granted for non commercial purposes.
In the 1960's, LRH made a number of seminal discoveries on the
subject of Help. Help, Control, Communication and Interest to be
specific. These later became the Pre-Havingness Scale because a being
had to come up through Help, Control, Communication and Interest before
he could HAVE anything.
He found that beings decayed down through these levels to the lower
levels of the tone scale. They tried to have things by being interested
in them. When that failed they tried to get them by communicating about
them. When that failed they tried to use control to get their way.
When that failed they would indulge in getting help and helping others.
And when that failed they started in on committing overt acts and
developing withholds.
Thus a scale was born that went as follows.
1.) Havingness
2.) Interest
3.) Communication
4.) Control
5.) Help
6.) Overts
7.) Withholds
The overts came in to play when people tried to help others by
harming them, much as a parent tries to correct the disobedience of a
child by spanking them. When direct methods of helping fail to work,
then more indirect and finally violent methods are used. As these don't
work either, and as the intention is still good, to help, the being
finally regrets his actions and this produces the withholds.
Below this point of the scale the being goes sour.
The scale continues as follows.
8.) Importance
9.) Leave
10.) Protect
11.) Abandon
12.) Endure
13.) Inverted Help
14.) Inverted Control
15.) Inverted Communication
16.) Inverted Interest
17.) Obsessive Can't Have
18.) No Effect
The being descends this scale on misguided efforts to HAVE and get
others to have too. He is pursuing his Goals and aligning with others
that have the same or similar goals. In the process he gets opposed and
this is where the conflicts lie.
Once the being enters into the band of Overts, Harming to Help, or
even accidental overts, merely harming while helping, he quickly gets
lost in the mire and confusion of his own anger and regrets. This leads
to strenuous efforts to withhold, not only from doing bad things again,
but also from telling others what he has done and what he feels about
them.
((There is harming in order to help and there is helping in order
to harm. Harming to help is like spanking a child, the intention is
still good, but one is using harm to warn or to help the child learn.
Helping to harm is betrayal and is a very different matter. This
is Inverted Help at the lower part of the scale.))
At this stage the being enters into a big IMPORTANCE about things.
Things are terribly important because he is caught in a total indecision
based upon his need to act and his fear of consequences.
The indecision is MUST ACT *AND* MUST NOT ACT.
In Scientology this is called a MAYBE.
((In Adore it's called an AND, trying to do two opposite things at
the same time.))
This is sort of a balancing point for the being, a turning point, a
fork in the road. He can decide to either go back up the scale or
further back down. He usually decides to go further down as this is his
safe solution to the problem he is in.
It is mainly a problem in self confidence, his willingness and
winningness in handling the efforts and counter efforts of life around
him without ruining his own goals and those of his friends. He gets
into a tizzy about it, every time he acts, he does something wrong, and
pretty soon the solution is to not act at all.
What he will do is leave. That is what a 'blow' is all about in
Scientology terminology, the being is so unsure of his own ability to
act properly that he will solve the mystery by leaving the area of
importance and let other beings handle it.
This is the mother who leaves her kids to a nanny or day care
center because she is worried she might not do the right thing. This is
the person who cannot speak for fear they might say the wrong thing.
This is the person who sits around all day long and does nothing
because they are just sure that if they do something it will turn out
disastrous.
The person still cares about what they are leaving behind, they
hope that by leaving, the problems they were trying to solve will be
better taken care of by other people still hanging around being
functional.
What the being finds though is that no matter how much they try to
leave their problems behind in other's hands, their problems always come
after them eventually, almost like they are tied to them with rubber
bands or strong rope.
The mother that leaves her child at a day care center because she
is sure they will 'do better by her child', finds out one day that the
care takers have been molesting her child in class and now things are
much worse than they were before.
Thus the problem comes back to the mother as she must now take the
child out of day care and back into her own hands. But she still feels
totally incompetent at doing right by the child. What she DOES feel
like she can do is PROTECT the child from further harm.
So rather than just continue on by being a good mother, which she
should have done in the first place, she will now proceed on a grand
crusade against child molestation, sex, men, anything at all that she
can blame for the harm done to her child. She is still not taking care
of the child or bringing it up properly, she is too busy PROTECTING her
child, probably to death.
The child will suffocate and become murderously mad at the mother
in such circumstances, for no child can grow in an atmosphere of
compulsive self serving over protection. The mother is incapable of
judging what is good for the child, and only wishes to make up for the
damage she allowed to occur before. Thus keeping the child locked up in
a closet and out of harms way seems like a good solution to her.
The child will be wishing murder off on everyone in sight by this
time. Many a serial killer was born this way.
Eventually the mother will see the error of her ways, the child
will hate her deeply, and probably become a behavioral problem of
magnitude. At this point the mother has another turning point, another
decision to make and usually they make the wrong one.
Recognizing her total failure not only to help the child grow up
properly but also to protect it from others and herself, she will give
up utterly and ABANDON the child. This is a more severe form of
leaving. In this case there is no thought of placing the child in good
care. She knows that any decision that she makes will be a wrong one,
so she leaves it up to fate to take care of the child. Thus she will
leave the child in a basket in a shopping center and never look back.
Many people are in this state with regard to their Basic Purposes.
They have abandoned them totally and now they move through life like a
tumble weed in the wind. No one is really benefiting from this sort of
behavior but almost everyone is doing it when it comes to their Eternal
Basic Purposes. People have become Mortal in their own minds because
they abandoned their Immortality long ago.
If perchance someone comes across the child in the shopping center
and calls the police and the mother is hunted down and brought back
together with the child she now enters a state of Endure. Or the man
who tried to run away from his wife but is captured and put in jail for
not paying his alimony payments. This is sort of a Can't Hide that
people get into when they try to escape their problems forever. Their
problems come after them and then they can't get away from them at all.
Now the mother has the State and her parents and the local police
all breathing down her neck about taking care of this child. So she
just closes her eyes and Endures. What she is enduring are the mistakes
she knows she will make and the enmity that she knows the child will
feel for her. She can't escape from hurting her own child, so she just
takes it. The child gets repeatedly hurt and she suffers her regret in
quiet sorrow.
It is at this point that a major shift takes place in the outlook
of the being stuck in their quandary. They can't get away from their
problem, they can't stop hurting those they love. Their only final
solution is to destroy the problem and those involved in it. This is
called inverted help. It is helping in order to harm.
The mother will pretend to be nice to the child, all the while
planning to kill it or drive it to suicide. The mother will take
destructive actions towards the child all in the name of help. She will
criticize the child, she will punish the child unfairly, she will make
the child hate her, she will berate the child, she will humiliate the
child, she will lie to the child, she will make sure the child is
useless and develops none of its potential. All for its own good. Her
intention is that the child die knowing that it is no longer wanted. In
her mind this is what she actually thinks is best for the child. She is
still trying to help the child by destroying it or getting it to destroy
itself.
Failing this, she will try to drive the child crazy with bad
control. She will use control over the child to guarantee that the
child is utterly unable to control anything, all physical, emotional,
mental and spiritual competency will vanish, and the child will come to
reject control of any kind for any reason. A being who can not or will
not well control their environment can not survive.
Failing this, the mother will try to destroy the child by
squelching its every communication. She will employ communication in
order to create a state of no communication in the child. She will take
the child's mind off what it is thinking about, she will interrupt the
child, she will refuse to communicate about anything important to the
child by talking only about endless inanities, and she will refuse to
let the child communicate about anything of importance at all and she
will force the child to communicate on endless wastelands of uselessness
and wasted opportunities. Sort of like homework. This is called
inverted communication. It means communicating with the intention of
creating a no communication. Relating on a not relating.
Failing this, the mother will fall into inverted interest. At this
stage she will show interest in things to take the child's attention off
of other things that the child is more interested in. She will force
the child to be interested in useless garbage and invalidate the child
for showing interest in anything that the mother did not show interest
in first. Thus by never showing interest in anything important, the
mother makes sure the child is never allowed to independently follow
their own goals.
Failing this, the mother goes into a state of obsessively not being
able to HAVE a good child and be a good mother. She will be
compulsively out of control and unable to execute any important or
functional activity in life with regard to raising a child.
If there is anything in life you have always wanted, but were
always totally unable to have, you should look to how you have fallen
down this scale to Obsessive Can't Have. It doesn't matter if it is
family, money, girls, power, freedom or art. It might even be good
Scientology auditing! If you can't have it, you are down around
Obsessive Can't Have on that subject. And you came down through all
those levels we have just been talking about.
Below Obsessive Can't Have is No Effect. This means simply that no
matter what the being does, it has no effect at all on anything he ever
wanted to effect. He might as well not exist.
Most Churchie auditors feel this way about their own case.
Now the sad thing about all this is that a being can't even begin
to get out of this mess unless he has some inkling of HELP. He either
has to help himself, or he has to be helped. And what he needs is to
rehabilitate his ability to help others and himself towards whatever
original goal they might have had.
Near the top of the scale, help makes a lot of sense. But as help
starts to decay people find out that help means harm. This is because
they fail to help, at first totally unintentionally. They teach their
kid how to walk and it falls down the stairs and breaks its neck. The
next kid they have, they refuse to help it learn to walk.
Have you ever hurt someone you were trying to help?
Have you ever been hurt trying to help someone?
Has anyone ever hurt you while trying to help you?
Has anyone ever been hurt while trying to help you?
These things happen by accident at first. It makes people very
sour on the subject of help. But what it really does is it makes them
mad. THEN they start to help people BY hurting them. Little Johnny is
running around the house learning to walk and he gets spanked for being
a bad boy. He might get killed after all!
This leads to regret and confusion and inaction.
So help becomes associated with pain way at the top of this scale.
But then to make matters worse as the being falls down the scale he
finally ends up in inverted help where he is offering to help in order
to hurt!
Thus we start off helping and harming by accident. Then we harm in
order to help. Then we help in order to harm.
Thus people have help and harm thoroughly confused. At the very
bottom you have people who are totally sure that any help is offered
only as a covert effort to betray and destroy them. Such people will
not receive help and when they offer it they have only your destruction
in mind.
Higher up are people who are convinced there is no help at all
period. "Well we are made of meat, and there is no God, and Divinity is
just a word, and we are all going to die anyhow, and who cares, its all
too painful to dreg up, so leave me alone."
A little higher are people who are aware of help but who are chary
as hell of it because they KNOW that help is dangerous. 'Well I know
the mind can be fixed, but I might die if you play around in it and you
don't know what you are doing, and I've got five kids and a wife and a
job to hold down and I can't afford to go to pieces right now, and
besides what would the neighbors think, and so you had better leave it
alone for now, I'll get auditing later...'
Above that are people who know there is help and who want help
desperately and who want to help just as desperately but who have no
idea where to find help. These kind walk into Scientology like a man in
a dessert walks into a sea of fresh water.
But to keep them there the first thing you have to do is run out
all the charge they have on HELP as thoroughly as you can or they won't
stay. Every erg of charge you can find in their banks on the subject of
help must be released, because Scientology is about HELP, and if they
have any Bank on the subject of help, they will turn Scientology into a
Bank operation and no one will ever go clear.
They will also miss the people who are down at inverted help,
helping to harm, who will walk into the Church and get themselves
elected to high level management positions.
Once you clear help, then you go on to clear control,
communication, and interest. At which point they will be able to HAVE
again. It's a very OT state. It was no small thing this descent into
trouble.
What they can HAVE by the way is their own Immortality once again.
The E/P of Havingness is "At Peace with one's own Immortality."
((Probably should say Eternality. Immortalities are dangerous
hells.))
One clears the level by getting all the charge off the subject.
Charge is caused by failures of any kind. Thus locating the desires and
failures to help, control, communicate and be interested in things will
run out most of the being's Bank. Forever. Or at least until he should
so choose to indulge in ludicrous demise again.
This bulletin is about clearing HELP because everyone you meet will
need to have help cleared on them first before you can touch anything
else on their case. You are HELPING them after all, right? If help
isn't clear on them, they will just play games with you at your expense
and theirs too.
If they are below help, they won't even let you audit them so the
point it moot. They will however try to join the Church in order to
Leave, Protect, Abandon, Endure or Destroy what ever it is they can't
handle in life. But they won't allow you to audit them, or they will
turn auditing into a ritual so that no confession is gleaned and the
truth is never found. And of course they will never get better.
In this way the Church can become a sanctuary for losers. So you
had better have help cleaned up in yourself so that you can spot the
loser that walks in the front door. If you don't, they WILL become your
managers.
It's not hard to spot them. They don't want you to audit help.
So the following processes are designed to clear the hell out of
help in a being. You can run them on another or even yourself. It
helps to have an E-meter, but just understanding this material will go a
long way to breaking your mind open to freedom and ability to help
again.
You know anyone who is really crazy, or depressed or having a hard
time of it in life, is just fouled up on this subject of help, even if
it's only just helping themselves. Remember they lived a whole life
around people who were also fouled up on help. So this stuff can work
miracles on a being. It helps though if they are in the market for
miracles. So don't waste your time with total losers. You've got
plenty of people to help who are still able to want to be helped. We
will get everyone someday.
So help falls into a number of categories.
Flow 1: Another helping you.
Flow 2: You helping another.
Flow 3: Others helping others.
Flow 4: You helping yourself.
Flow 5: Another helping themselves.
However there is an added complexity here which is called the
KUCDEINR Scale. It goes,
Source of
Cause of
Known (K)
Unknown (U)
Curious about (C)
Desire (D)
Enforce (E)
Inhibit (I)
No (N)
Refused (R)
Withheld
It delineates the cycle of desire and failure on any subject of
importance to a thetan. At first he is source of the thing. Then he
falls down to creating it or causing it. Then he plays a game with
himself of not having it and trying to get it. At this point he is
curious about it. Then he falls to desiring it strongly. When this
fails to accomplish what he wants he will take to enforcing it, or using
force to get his way. This failing he will inhibit the thing, using
force to NOT have it, NOT want it, NOT care about it, and NOT let others
have or want it or care about it either. Eventually he falls down to NO
recognition of the thing at all. It just isn't there for him as a
problem or a desire or a failure of any kind. Later he will refuse the
thing even if it is offered to him free of charge.
Thus a being goes from HAVING down through PLAYING TO GET, to
REFUSING TO HAVE at the bottom. It's just another way of looking at the
Pre-Havingness scale itself.
Help is something you can give and receive. It's also something
you can be curious about, desire, enforce, inhibit, deny and refuse.
The dividing point here is enforce and inhibit. So we would want a set
of processes that covered this entire area rather thoroughly.
This would include all possible combinations of enforcing and
inhibiting, giving and receiving help. Of course you can include any
other flows that interest you and what I have laid out below is just
what I have found workable for myself.
A very general run can be made as follows:
Flow 1: Another helping you.
1.) How has another helped you?
2.) How has another not helped you?
3.) How has another tried to help you and failed?
4.) How has another tried to not help you and failed?
5.) How has another forced help on you?
6.) How has another refused to help you?
7.) How have you forced another to help you?
8.) How have you refused another's help?
Flow 2: You helping another.
1.) How have you helped another?
2.) How have you not helped another?
3.) How have you tried to help another and failed?
4.) How have you tried to not help another and failed?
5.) How have you forced help on another?
6.) How have you refused help to another?
7.) How has another forced you to help them?
8.) How has another refused your help?
Flow 3: Others helping others.
1.) How have others helped others?
2.) How have others not helped others?
3.) How have others tried to help others and failed?
4.) How have others tried to not help others and failed?
5.) How have others forced help on others?
6.) How have others refused to help others?
7.) How have others forced others to help them?
8.) How have others refused other's help?
Flow 4: You helping yourself.
1.) How have you helped yourself?
2.) How have you not helped yourself?
3.) How have you tried to help yourself and failed?
4.) How have you tried to not help yourself and failed?
5.) How have you forced help on yourself?
6.) How have you refused help to yourself?
7.) How have you forced yourself to help yourself?
8.) How have you refused your own help?
Flow 5: Another helping themselves.
1.) How has another helped themselves?
2.) How has another not helped themselves?
3.) How has another tried to help themselves and failed?
4.) How has another tried to not help themselves and failed?
5.) How has another forced help on themselves?
6.) How has another refused help to themselves?
7.) How has another forced themselves to help themselves?
8.) How has another refused their own help?
The second and third questions have slightly different meanings.
For example the second question 'How has another not helped you?' merely
asks for what help did not take place. For example, 'Well my parents
did not sell crack cocaine to make money for me to go to college even
though it may have crossed their mind.'
The third question, 'How has another tried to help you and failed',
asks for those times of attempted help which failed. For example 'Well
my parents tried to take out a loan to pay for my college tuition, but
it was refused due to my father's lack of income.'
The order in which you run these questions is not critical, what
ever makes you or your pc the most happy. LRH says to run
How have you helped someone?
How have you not helped someone?
alternately for long runs.
You can run each question repeatedly until the pc has no more
answers on that question and then go on to the next one. Or you can
cycle through them. You can even run all 5 flows on each help sub
question before going on to the next help question. For example
Help question 1.
Flow 1. How has another helped you?
Flow 2. How have you helped another?
Flow 3. How have others helped others?
Flow 4. How have you helped yourself?
Flow 5. How have others helped themselves?
Help question 2.
Flow 1. How has another not helped you?
Flow 2. How have you not helped another?
etc.
You would then follow this with all 5 flows on each of the
remaining 8 help questions:.
1.) Help
2.) Not help
3.) Tried to help but failed.
4.) Tried to not help but failed.
5.) Forced help on
6.) Refused help to
7.) Force to help
8.) Help was refused (prevented from helping).
If the person is having a hard time coming up with answers to the
questions go on to the next question. If you have an E-meter you can
check the question after the pc says 'no more' and see if it still
reads. If it does, gently get the pc to look further. Don't push the
pc against his will though. Just go on. When you come back to that
question later there will be more uncovered for him to tell you.
Another thing you can do is break it down into the 4 planes of
existence for the pc. For example,
Flow 1, Help Question 1:
1.) How has another helped you on the physical plane?
2.) How has another helped you on the emotional plane?
3.) How has another helped you on the mental plane?
4.) How has another helped you on the spiritual plane?
The 4 planes of existence are a subset of the Scientology Know to
Mystery scale. The being is running at these many different vibrations
and as he fails in life tends to run at the lower vibrations more than
the higher ones. At the bottom he is rock.
KNOW TO MYSTERY SCALE
1.) NATIVE STATE SPIRITUAL
2.) KNOW |
3.) NOT KNOW | AS-ISNESS FORM
4.) KNOW ABOUT MENTAL ALTER-ISNESS SIGNIFICANCE
5.) LOOK | ISNESS PERSISTENCE
6.) EMOTE EMOTIONAL
7.) EFFORT PHYSICAL
8.) THINK |
9.) SYMBOLS |
10.) EAT |
11.) DEATH |
12.) SEX |
13.) MYSTERY |
14.) WAIT |
15.) UNCONSCIOUS | NOT-ISNESS
16.) UNKNOWABLE | FALSE KNOWING
NATIVE STATE. This is the Big Snooze or Sovereignty out the top of
the tone scale.
KNOW. This is the thetan waking up to a state of total ability
with nothing yet created except awareness of how to create and that he
can.
NOT KNOW. This is the creation of forms and things with out
significance. For example the thetan can make something that looks like
an ashtray, but has no use for it and does not consider it an ashtray.
It merely has the form of one.
In Scientology this is considered the state of an AS-ISNESS, the
state something is in when it was just created. It is claimed in
Scientology that AS-ISNESSes tend to vanish unless they are altered
quickly. Thus a persistence is created by altering an AS-ISNESS thereby
producing an ALTER-ISNESS.
KNOW ABOUT. Here the thetan assigns AFTER THE FACT OF THEIR
CREATION, significances to the forms he has created. He assigns
causation and uses to things, thus the ashtray comes to be considered
something that can and should be used to hold ashes. Significance is
always added to an object after the fact of it's creation.
The addition of a significance to a form is the act of altering
it's prime truth which is that it was just a form. Thus things which
have had significances added have been ALTER-ISed. This produces an IS-
NESS which is the persisting reality around you that you can look at.
((Everything you can see has a name and a use and where it came
from.))
LOOK. This is the level of sensory data of any kind. Visual color
form. It also includes sonic, tactile, and taste and smell along with
50 or so other peceptics outlined in Dianetics.
Anything that persists on it's own is an IS-NESS. It can be sensed
and felt and manipulated. You can stand back and watch it continue. An
IS-NESS consists of an AS-ISNESS altered by the addition of a
significance to it. Common significances that can be added to an object
are 1.) Who or what created it, 2.) When it was created and 3.) What it
can cause and what it is used for.
This altering of an AS-ISNESS produces a persistence of the created
form. In order to vanish the form for oneself and for everyone, one
would have to perceive the form again in it's pristine AS-IS state
without any significances added to it.
EMOTE. Emotion is used by the thetan as the causal bridge between
his mind and the action of his body. He uses emotion to MOVE the body.
When very low toned it looks like the thetan is moved by his emotions,
but higher toned the thetan CREATES emotion willfully and moves the body
with it. Each emotion from Enthusiasm down through Sorrow has it's use
and proper place. When the thetan loses his state of Clear and becomes
other-determined he can be made to feel these emotions against his will
and thus he becomes a 'sad' puppy.
When clear, the thetan creates and uses each tone as appropriate to
the situation. He does not run BECAUSE he is afraid, he CAUSES himself
to run BY being afraid. He doesn't run FROM fear, he runs WITH fear.
Same for Anger and Sorrow. He will try winning with each higher tone
first before he will try the next tone down.
The tone that wins for him becomes pretty. Thus there is beautiful
anger, beautiful fear and beautiful sorrow. Even beautiful apathy. Its
all a game of movement and effort.
EFFORT. This is the band of physical force that the thetan creates
in his body and the body creates in the physical universe. The main
purpose of effort and force is to move MATTER in order to change it's
ENERGY content.
THINKING. This is the use of mental effort to ask and answer
questions, to compute the future from data at hand. It is not the same
as THOUGHT which is a creative ability of the mind up around KNOW on
this scale.
If a person gets the idea of an elephant eating some hay, that's a
thought. If the person tries to compute how to escape the elephant
running towards him, that's thinking.
Thought is causal creative outflow of various things to effect you.
Thinking is trying to logically compute how those effects are going to
effect you and what you need to do to get what you want.
Thought is how you create problems. Thinking is how you try to
solve problems.
Thought is how you CREATE the game of effects. Thinking is how you
PLAY the game of effects.
SYMBOLS. A symbol is anything with mass, meaning and mobility. It
is made of mass, it has meaning (significance), and it has the ability
to be moved by an orientation point. The orientation point is the
source of symbols and their significances, and is the point from which
all symbols are created and/or located.
A thetan is natively an orientation point, but he eventually slides
down the tone scale to being a symbol. Thetans, as a symbol, often
orient themselves relative to their home, or their body, or their
parents or their planet, or God, or even the sun, etc. They consider
these symbols as bigger orientation points than they are. Such symbols
are called anchor points because they are used by the thetan to keep
space in place for him, and he moves around inside of that space
relative to his anchor points.
A thetan actually can not move as space is a projection from within
him. Space is an apparency and has no actual existence other than as a
perception. One perceives space in dreams, there is no space there
either.
The ultimate symbol of course is a human body, it has mass, meaning
and mobility. It defines it's existence and whereabouts relative to
others in the environment. As the thetan comes up tone towards clear he
exteriorizes from being a body by exteriorizing from his need to be a
symbol.
At this point he can take on his post as an orientation point again
and be the source of where other things come from and are. He becomes a
Creator again rather than a Creature. An orientation point does not
locate himself relative to anything else. He locates everything
relative to himself.
((To locate has two meanings, one causal, the other effect.
To Locate means causally, to place in space and time.
To Locate means as an effect, to find where something is in space
and time.))
The world is a dream, you have never really ever gone anywhere, so
this can be understood very easily.
EAT. At this level the being is involved in surviving as a symbol
by destroying other symbols, mainly by eating them. Because he can die
himself by being eaten, the next level down is DEATH.
DEATH. The result of being eaten and other forces.
SEX. In order to make up for the consequences of death and being
eaten, the being must propagate his race with sex. Sex is an effort to
continue on in spite of being eaten and death.
What is often missed about biology, is that it BENEFITS a species
to be eaten. The grass grows better because the herds graze on it and
poop on it. It would have been easy to develop into a poisonous entity,
but the grass that was tasty survived better. Thus being eaten is not a
loss of survival but a gain of survival. Being eaten was the BRIGHT
thing to do. Thus death HAD to be entered into the equation as a way to
survive. And so therefore did some form of procreation.
MYSTERY. At this point of the tone scale the being is in a quandry
and feels he is in mystery, or DON'T KNOW ABOUT. He has lost contact
with his own postulates, his own assignations of causation and
significance, and can no longer predict the environment. A being that
has been wrong too many times ends up in mystery.
WAIT. Below mystery is waiting. There is nothing else to do.
UNCONSCIOUSNESS. At this point the being starts to NOT-IS his
mystery. This means he makes it seem that the whole thing does not
exist. It goes unconscious on him. Thus he forms a Reactive Mind he
does not know is there and becomes a basher on the net. He also needs
an E-meter to help him recover everything that he has so carefully
buried.
This is below HIDING on the tone scale at BEING NOTHING.
UNKNOWABLE. Below hiding is CAN'T HIDE. The being has sort of
broken through the under side of UNCONSCIOUSNESS where he is no longer
able to go unconscious at will. What he knows in this state is that
basically things are unknowable and that he had nothing to do with it.
It is sort of a nightmare dream state about as far away from lucidity as
he can get. He figures that whatever he was in mystery about is
unknowable. Thus he falls into the race of human beings who think that
ultimate truth either does not exist or can not be known and that
certainly he had nothing to do with it or his present condition at the
bottom of the pit.
Below this he becomes a Senator.
By the way if the whole subject of help makes you sick, then you
are either above or below it on the Pre Have Scale, and you should find
your level and run that instead.
Your worst psychosomatic will be down at NO EFFECT. That is what
you wanted when you created it, right? An UNCURABILITY.
You will need to run these help processes on your pc's hottest
terminal pair. To find these terminals you can make a list using the E-
meter and run the following. The people which read the most and which
the pc is the most interested in will be his hottest terminals.
1.) Who do you want to help?
2.) Who do you not want to help?
3.) Who have you tried to help and failed?
4.) Who have you tried to not help and failed?
5.) Who have you forced help on?
6.) Who have you refused to help?
7.) Who has forced you to help them?
8.) Who has refused your help?
((Remember that classes of whos form a what. There will be mother
as a who, but MOTHERS/FEMALES/PARENTS as a what. Finding whos is
important, but finding the whats that the who represents is more
important. Then run help on the what, not the who.))
Once you find the terminal that the pc is the most bonkers on, you
can just see the emotion welling up in the pc, then run the help
questions with that terminal in the place of 'another'.
But if you really want to do this thoroughly, you should pick your
hottest terminal pair and run it through all 8 flows of forgetfulness
listed below, rather than the 5 flows of Standard Scientology. Each of
the 8 flows has 8 questions, so that's 64 questions all told.
You don't have to run this like a robot, going over each flow
exactly as written out. If you have an E-meter, have your pc read this
bulletin from beginning to end and note the reads and changes of needle
characteristics. If you pc is down at Leave or Endure he will read on
those levels and not on Help. If he is really at help he will be all
smiles and ready to go with blazing stories to tell you as he gets the
charge off his life of misadventure and co adventure. Help is mainly a
story of co adventure, of bonding together for a common good, and then
failing or being cruel to the agreements you made with each other.
Running this stuff out from beginning to end produces a civilized
being who can be trusted again, and more importantly someone who can
trust themselves all the way up and down the line, and help others to
the same state.
((They can co operate again on a grand scale with others across all
8 dynamics of action, self, family, communities/groups, mankind, life
forms, MEST, spirits and The Infinite.))
In running these processes, a person will quickly cognite that a
hefty portion of his case stems from his efforts to force others to help
him, and to prevent others from forcing him to help them. It takes a
sick Parent to raise a sick Child. Sick Children usually go on to being
sick Parents. Rarely is the lesson learned. And sometimes even when
they have good Parents, some people go on to be sick Parents anyhow.
Just sort of an ingrained cussedness I guess.
Your pc may also cognite that he is making himself sick IN ORDER TO
HELP others, as looney as that might sound. He will often be found to
have the very ailments of those he loved, helped and harmed. He is
trying to help them out of it by having it himself. Watch out if those
loved ones are dead, he won't want to give up his maladies easily.
((Expect LOVE to be at the root of aberrations, but not
rationality.))
Remember you want terminal PAIRS for this last set of processes.
If the guy's mother comes up as his hottest terminal, find out if
it's really 'a mother' that is bugging him, or if it's 'a woman' or 'a
female body' or 'a teacher'. It may be the person he calls his mother
that is hot, but it may not be her identity AS A MOTHER that is hot, it
may be her identity as 'a woman' or even 'a lover'. Get it?
If it turns out to be some teacher in school, again find out what
the actual identity is that is hot on that person. Then find out what
the pc's identity was in the conflict with that other person. For
example if it's 'a teacher', then was the pc 'a student'?
The terminal is the WHO, the identity is the WHAT the who was
being.
A terminal is a person or thing, an identity is a beingness.
((Each who is a unique person, each what is a class of many people.
There was only one Mrs. Jones, but many teachers.))
Once you have the terminal pairs and the correct identities that go
with them, run your pc on the following 64 processes until there is no
charge left, or he attains a serious win on all four planes, physical,
emotional, mental and spiritual.
64 WAY HELP ON TERMINAL PAIRS.
Using Parent and Child identities as example.
Flow 1: You helping a Child as a Parent in a past life.
How have you helped a Child as a Parent in a past life?
How have you not helped a Child as a Parent in a past life?
How have you tried to help a Child and failed as a Parent in a past
life?
How have you tried to not help a Child and failed as a Parent in a past
life?
How have you forced help on a Child as a Parent in a past life?
How have you refused to help a Child as a Parent in a past life?
How has a Child forced you to help them as a Parent in a past life?
How has a Child refused your help as a Parent in a past life?
Flow 2: A Parent helping you as a Child in this life.
How has a Parent helped you as a Child in this life?
How has a Parent not helped you as a Child in this life?
How has a Parent tried to help you as a Child and failed in this life?
How has a Parent tried to not help you as a Child and failed in this
life?
How has a Parent forced help on you as a Child in this life?
How has a Parent refused to help you as a Child in this life?
How have you forced a Parent to help you as a Child in this life?
How have you refused the help of a Parent as a Child in this life?
Flow 3: A Child helping you as a Parent in a past life.
How has a Child helped you as a Parent in a past life?
How has a Child not helped you as a Parent in a past life?
How has a Child tried to help you as a Parent and failed in a past life?
How has a Child tried to not help you as a Parent and failed in a past
life?
How has a Child forced help on you as a Parent in a past life?
How has a Child refused to help you as a Parent in a past life?
How have you forced a Child to help you as a Parent in a past life?
How have you refused the help of a Child as a Parent in a past life?
Flow 4: You helping a Parent as a Child in this life.
How have you helped a Parent as a Child in this life?
How have you not helped a Parent as a Child in this life?
How have you tried to help a Parent and failed as a Child in this life?
How have you tried to not help a Parent and failed as a Child in this
life?
How have you forced help on a Parent as a Child in this life?
How have you refused to help a Parent as a Child in this life?
How has a Parent forced you to help them as a Child in this life?
How has a Parent refused your help as a Child in this life?
Flow 5: Another Parent helping another Child in any life.
How has another Parent helped another Child in any life?
How has another Parent not helped another Child in any life?
How has another Parent tried to help another Child and failed in any
life?
How has another Parent tried to not help another Child and failed in any
life?
How has another Parent forced help on another Child in any life?
How has another Parent refused help to another Child in any life?
How has another Child forced another Parent to help them in any life?
How has another Child refused help from another Parent in any life?
Flow 6: Another Child helping another Parent in any life.
How has another Child helped another Parent in any life?
How has another Child not helped another Parent in any life?
How has another Child tried to help another Parent and failed in any
life?
How has another Child tried to not help another Parent and failed in any
life?
How has another Child forced help on another Parent in any life?
How has another Child refused help to another Parent in any life?
How has another Parent forced another Child to help them in any life?
How has another Parent refused help from another Child in any life?
Flow 7: You helping yourself as a Parent in a past life.
How have you helped yourself as a Parent in a past life?
How have you not helped yourself as a Parent in a past life?
How have you tried to help yourself and failed as a Parent in a past
life?
How have you tried to not help yourself and failed as a Parent in a past
life?
How have you forced help on yourself as a Parent in a past life?
How have you refused help to yourself as a Parent in a past life?
How have you forced yourself to help yourself as a Parent in a past
life?
How have you refused help from yourself as a Parent in a past life?
Flow 8: You helping yourself as a Child in this life.
How have you helped yourself as a Child in this life?
How have you not helped yourself as a Child in this life?
How have you tried to help yourself and failed as a Child in this life?
How have you tried to not help yourself and failed as a Child in this
life?
How have you forced help on yourself as a Child in this life?
How have you refused help to yourself as a Child in this life?
How have you forced yourself to help yourself as a Child in this
life?
How have you refused help from yourself as a Child in this life?
Electra
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith This file may be found at
homer@rahul.net ftp.rahul.net/pub/homer/act/EXM38.MEMO
Posted to usenet newsgroup: alt.clearing.technology
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
ADORE468
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
THE SCIENCE OF CERTAINTY
The science of certainty has been written for the scientist lest it
fall into the hands of new age crystal gazers and religious know
nothings and turned into just another monument to bigotry.
The joke is, the new age crystal gazers get it, the Phd's don't.
The soullessness of modern day science is not a shining example of
truth either.
Their highest pinnacle of success has been the science of
UNCERTAINTY leading them down the garden path into worlds of virtual
reality, illusion and delusion, all the while thinking it is actual,
like someone lost in an arcade game.
The final delusion is that consciousness is a process in the
physical universe, when in truth the physical universe is a process in
consciousness.
The game player is not OF the game.
If you can even handle the possibility of this without dismissing
it out of hand, you are part of the solution rather than part of the
problem.
The light of perfect certainty illuminates the existence of the
soul because it IS the soul. The soul is the answer to the question
"What is it that sees red and blue and what is it that is certain that
it sees red and blue, i.e. two different colors?"
The soul is the light bulb seeing itself.
LOOKER and LOOKED-AT are one.
There are those who would prefer that you not know you exist or
that you live in doubt of any certainty.
Their intent is not good.
Know them then by their lack of perfect certainty on ANY matter.
And by minds polluted to the hilt with 'certainties' that can not
possibly be.
They doubt that they doubt, and they doubt that they doubt that
they doubt.
They doubt by POLICY, and they doubt that too, which they then
claim is consistent with policy! But that too they doubt in order to
further remain consistent with policy.
And they walk on the streets among us, otherwise intelligent and
'productive' human beings in the games of life.
However if you can't attain perfect certainty that you doubt
things, your conscious light is out or flickering on the edge.
This is a mental illness that is not good for Earth.
If you aren't perfectly certain you exist, then please stop
breathing.
I mean really, to hell with you, if you can't be certain you exist,
then you won't be certain you are in hell when you get there. So what
difference would it make?
There are those that hate Earth, that hate life, that hate trying
to be here and make a go of it.
They can't wait to get to heaven, and don't care how they get
there, and they don't care whether they leave the Earth growing green or
glowing green.
This is the legacy of bigots, those lost in the false light of
false certainties and blind to the true light of true certainties, the
only true certainties there are, I AM, I WANT, I KNOW and I DO (CAUSE).
It is as simple as that.
But they will tell you that I AM, I WANT (CARE, GIVE A DAMN), I
KNOW, and I DO are delusions of the brain falling for its own illusions.
The false certainties can only last while there is no light of true
certainty, so it is imperative that the Proof and true certainties be
buried out existence for things to continue on the road to ruin.
http://www.lightlink.com/theproof
Learning with certainty is impossible across a space time distance,
therefore there is no distance between you and anything you can perceive
with certainty.
You have never seen the physical universe, and can not know whether
it exists or not. All you have ever seen is your conscious rendition of
it, your personal dream of it, and that is all you can be certain of.
The road to ruin is built by bricks of bigotry.
The moral superiority of those going to heaven FOREVER and the
irredeemable moral inferiority of those going to hell FOREVER.
The other side of bigotry is class.
"Class is an attitude, that *ALL* should live forever and be my
friend. Desire is sovereign.
This dream ends forever when the circle of friends are all holding
hands again." - Adore http://www.adore.com
Religion has rarely tried to advance the world in present time,
science at least has tried, all of chemical, biological, atomic and
genetic warfare to the contrary. These are the weapons of science in
the hands of animals and bigots.
What religion will do with The Proof I shudder to think, but
science should understand that perfect certainty is the bridge between
science and religion, between the physical and the spiritual.
Nothing physical can be certain of anything, and thus we *DEFINE*
that which can be certain of I AM, I WANT, I KNOW and I DO, to be the
spiritual, to be of the Spirit, the timeless, spaceless, dimensionless
conscious unit.
Certainty of implies zero dimensionality of.
The single greatest difference between the physical and the
spiritual is this one thing called perfect certainty.
That which has it is spiritual, that which doesn't is not.
Science should understand that consciousness is a window between
the physical universe and God, the great multi I AM being, and that each
and every one of us is one of those I AM's in carnation.
Thus one does not have to go far to find an instantiation of God,
and one does not have to send to find for whom the bell tolls.
Homer
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink (607)
277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY homer@lightlink.com
In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Tue Mar 13 00:39:45 EST 2007
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
THE SCIENCE OF CERTAINTY
The science of certainty has been written for the scientist lest it
fall into the hands of new age crystal gazers and religious know
nothings and turned into just another monument to bigotry.
The joke is, the new age crystal gazers get it, the Phd's don't.
The soullessness of modern day science is not a shining example of
truth either.
Their highest pinnacle of success has been the science of
UNCERTAINTY leading them down the garden path into worlds of virtual
reality, illusion and delusion, all the while thinking it is actual,
like someone lost in an arcade game.
The final delusion is that consciousness is a process in the
physical universe, when in truth the physical universe is a process in
consciousness.
The game player is not OF the game.
If you can even handle the possibility of this without dismissing
it out of hand, you are part of the solution rather than part of the
problem.
The light of perfect certainty illuminates the existence of the
soul because it IS the soul. The soul is the answer to the question
"What is it that sees red and blue and what is it that is certain that
it sees red and blue, i.e. two different colors?"
The soul is the light bulb seeing itself.
LOOKER and LOOKED-AT are one.
There are those who would prefer that you not know you exist or
that you live in doubt of any certainty.
Their intent is not good.
Know them then by their lack of perfect certainty on ANY matter.
And by minds polluted to the hilt with 'certainties' that can not
possibly be.
They doubt that they doubt, and they doubt that they doubt that
they doubt.
They doubt by POLICY, and they doubt that too, which they then
claim is consistent with policy! But that too they doubt in order to
further remain consistent with policy.
And they walk on the streets among us, otherwise intelligent and
'productive' human beings in the games of life.
However if you can't attain perfect certainty that you doubt
things, your conscious light is out or flickering on the edge.
This is a mental illness that is not good for Earth.
If you aren't perfectly certain you exist, then please stop
breathing.
I mean really, to hell with you, if you can't be certain you exist,
then you won't be certain you are in hell when you get there. So what
difference would it make?
There are those that hate Earth, that hate life, that hate trying
to be here and make a go of it.
They can't wait to get to heaven, and don't care how they get
there, and they don't care whether they leave the Earth growing green or
glowing green.
This is the legacy of bigots, those lost in the false light of
false certainties and blind to the true light of true certainties, the
only true certainties there are, I AM, I WANT, I KNOW and I DO (CAUSE).
It is as simple as that.
But they will tell you that I AM, I WANT (CARE, GIVE A DAMN), I
KNOW, and I DO are delusions of the brain falling for its own illusions.
The false certainties can only last while there is no light of true
certainty, so it is imperative that the Proof and true certainties be
buried out existence for things to continue on the road to ruin.
http://www.lightlink.com/theproof
Learning with certainty is impossible across a space time distance,
therefore there is no distance between you and anything you can perceive
with certainty.
You have never seen the physical universe, and can not know whether
it exists or not. All you have ever seen is your conscious rendition of
it, your personal dream of it, and that is all you can be certain of.
The road to ruin is built by bricks of bigotry.
The moral superiority of those going to heaven FOREVER and the
irredeemable moral inferiority of those going to hell FOREVER.
The other side of bigotry is class.
"Class is an attitude, that *ALL* should live forever and be my
friend. Desire is sovereign.
This dream ends forever when the circle of friends are all holding
hands again." - Adore http://www.adore.com
Religion has rarely tried to advance the world in present time,
science at least has tried, all of chemical, biological, atomic and
genetic warfare to the contrary. These are the weapons of science in
the hands of animals and bigots.
What religion will do with The Proof I shudder to think, but
science should understand that perfect certainty is the bridge between
science and religion, between the physical and the spiritual.
Nothing physical can be certain of anything, and thus we *DEFINE*
that which can be certain of I AM, I WANT, I KNOW and I DO, to be the
spiritual, to be of the Spirit, the timeless, spaceless, dimensionless
conscious unit.
Certainty of implies zero dimensionality of.
The single greatest difference between the physical and the
spiritual is this one thing called perfect certainty.
That which has it is spiritual, that which doesn't is not.
Science should understand that consciousness is a window between
the physical universe and God, the great multi I AM being, and that each
and every one of us is one of those I AM's in carnation.
Thus one does not have to go far to find an instantiation of God,
and one does not have to send to find for whom the bell tolls.
Homer
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink (607)
277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY homer@lightlink.com
In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Tue Mar 13 00:39:45 EST 2007
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Thursday, March 21, 2013
ADORE362
BIRTH AND DEATH
The first time you run into someone 'you never knew before' it's
a violation of your sovereignty.
"Who invited you into my dream?"
One begins to wonder if one ever invited anyone or anything.
Doubt is self casting. The more you wonder, the less it seems
likely.
It's not that she wouldn't talk to you, its that she was
there in the first place.
So much for sovereignty.
An unexpected delight is a serious problem to a being.
There mere presence of an unexpected delight implies the possibility
of an unexpected horror, so delight clouds our future with forboding.
The solution is making a virtue out of a horrible necessity.
Thus we find joy in birth and sorrow in death.
Both first hellos and last goodbyes are enforced.
We may CLAIM we are willing, but in truth we have no choice.
We meet people we wish we never had met, and they usually out live
us :)
We meet people we are happy to have met, but then we lose them,
usually they die before we do :).
Thus the hello and goodbye cycle becomes enforced, resented and
eventually refused, we simply refuse to meet anyone new lest we
detest them forever for free, or bond with them forever for free.
The only thing cats are good for is ripping the heart out of your
soul when they go.
Homer
Thu Mar 21 12:16:35 EDT 2013
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
The first time you run into someone 'you never knew before' it's
a violation of your sovereignty.
"Who invited you into my dream?"
One begins to wonder if one ever invited anyone or anything.
Doubt is self casting. The more you wonder, the less it seems
likely.
It's not that she wouldn't talk to you, its that she was
there in the first place.
So much for sovereignty.
An unexpected delight is a serious problem to a being.
There mere presence of an unexpected delight implies the possibility
of an unexpected horror, so delight clouds our future with forboding.
The solution is making a virtue out of a horrible necessity.
Thus we find joy in birth and sorrow in death.
Both first hellos and last goodbyes are enforced.
We may CLAIM we are willing, but in truth we have no choice.
We meet people we wish we never had met, and they usually out live
us :)
We meet people we are happy to have met, but then we lose them,
usually they die before we do :).
Thus the hello and goodbye cycle becomes enforced, resented and
eventually refused, we simply refuse to meet anyone new lest we
detest them forever for free, or bond with them forever for free.
The only thing cats are good for is ripping the heart out of your
soul when they go.
Homer
Thu Mar 21 12:16:35 EDT 2013
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
BIRTH AND DEATH
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
BIRTH AND DEATH
The first time you run into someone 'you never knew before' it's
a violation of your sovereignty.
"Who invited you into my dream?"
One begins to wonder if one ever invited anyone or anything.
Doubt is self casting.
It's not that she wouldn't talk to you, its that she was
there in the first place.
So much for sovereignty.
An unexpected delight is a serious problem to a being.
There mere presence of an unexpected delight implies the possibility
of an unexpected horror, so delight clouds our future with forboding.
The solution is making a virtue out of a horrible necessity.
Thus we find joy in birth and sorrow in death.
Both first hellos and last goodbyes are enforced.
We may CLAIM we are willing, but in truth we have no choice.
We meet people we wish we never had met, and they usually out live
us :)
We meet people we are happy to have met, but then we lose them,
usually they die before we do :).
Thus the hello and goodbye cycle becomes enforced, resented and
eventually refused, we simply refuse to meet anyone new lest we
detest it forever for free, or bond with it.
The only thing cats are good for is ripping the heart out of your
soul.
Homer
======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Thu Mar 21 12:16:35 EDT 2013
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore362.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFRSzJjURT1lqxE3HERAsq8AJ9z3dBSEd69XFJb1Uc6VH68ACxS3ACfYtYd
nW8rQ7vmOLFAHAuUEmbnSsU=
=5Hwb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
BIRTH AND DEATH
The first time you run into someone 'you never knew before' it's
a violation of your sovereignty.
"Who invited you into my dream?"
One begins to wonder if one ever invited anyone or anything.
Doubt is self casting.
It's not that she wouldn't talk to you, its that she was
there in the first place.
So much for sovereignty.
An unexpected delight is a serious problem to a being.
There mere presence of an unexpected delight implies the possibility
of an unexpected horror, so delight clouds our future with forboding.
The solution is making a virtue out of a horrible necessity.
Thus we find joy in birth and sorrow in death.
Both first hellos and last goodbyes are enforced.
We may CLAIM we are willing, but in truth we have no choice.
We meet people we wish we never had met, and they usually out live
us :)
We meet people we are happy to have met, but then we lose them,
usually they die before we do :).
Thus the hello and goodbye cycle becomes enforced, resented and
eventually refused, we simply refuse to meet anyone new lest we
detest it forever for free, or bond with it.
The only thing cats are good for is ripping the heart out of your
soul.
Homer
======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Thu Mar 21 12:16:35 EDT 2013
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore362.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFRSzJjURT1lqxE3HERAsq8AJ9z3dBSEd69XFJb1Uc6VH68ACxS3ACfYtYd
nW8rQ7vmOLFAHAuUEmbnSsU=
=5Hwb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Wednesday, March 20, 2013
OWNERSHIP II
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
OWNERSHIP II
> So one is laying cause for cognition at the feet of their auditor?
Yes. The truth is co cause, the computation is that co cause is
NECESSARY, mostly 2 way communication, but also superior know how.
It's one thing to want help, its quite another NEED HELP.
In this world sometimes people NEED HELP, it can happen, but people
with a controlling intent will say you need help when you don't, that
you CAN'T DO IT ALONE, and worse that you SHOULDN'T DO IT ALONE, because
it's dangerous, wrong, bad for the group, etc. So they turn needing
help into an ethical imperative.
> Do not wish to be beholden to anybody?
Not forever.
> On the Chart of Human Attitudes at the top of the scale one owns
>the auditor, "Owns All", but there are viewpoints in that scale which
>emcompass "All that is".
Yes, the hard part is PUTTING THE HELP THERE as fully responsible.
My responsibility and put there level at the time I was in the
church was literally negative.
Even today its only analytical, actually putting there the death of
Mira, or any part of my life is zip, beyond horrifying. No willing to
take responsibility for. Wanna kill whoever was :)
> I am co-auditing for free, so it that okay?
As long as there are no agreements to not discuss one's own case or
gains or understandings out of session, except maybe for a sunsetable
while, and as long as both parties are considering they are getting a fair
exchange for the work they put into each other.
Remember as auditor, you can help forever for free, because its an
out flow. The practicality of doing so may be limited for he who would
outflow must inflow too.
But as a preclear, being helped and helped and helped, is a degrade
and eventually the preclear goes into a refused help.
Kids do this with their useless mothers, who won't let the kid help
himself, because the mother feels useless if the kid can be self
sufficient.
It's psycho, but the kid gets to refused to be helped, and starts
to feel useless also. This sits on top of volcanic matricidal feelings.
Homer
======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Wed Mar 20 11:47:41 EDT 2013
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore943.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFRSdodURT1lqxE3HERAj2KAJ9cByLuVuFc7nFU2YcqW9k/Pk1u0ACdHj66
C8HxnGbAYKxx2QbAGGU7D/w=
=d+rs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
OWNERSHIP II
> So one is laying cause for cognition at the feet of their auditor?
Yes. The truth is co cause, the computation is that co cause is
NECESSARY, mostly 2 way communication, but also superior know how.
It's one thing to want help, its quite another NEED HELP.
In this world sometimes people NEED HELP, it can happen, but people
with a controlling intent will say you need help when you don't, that
you CAN'T DO IT ALONE, and worse that you SHOULDN'T DO IT ALONE, because
it's dangerous, wrong, bad for the group, etc. So they turn needing
help into an ethical imperative.
> Do not wish to be beholden to anybody?
Not forever.
> On the Chart of Human Attitudes at the top of the scale one owns
>the auditor, "Owns All", but there are viewpoints in that scale which
>emcompass "All that is".
Yes, the hard part is PUTTING THE HELP THERE as fully responsible.
My responsibility and put there level at the time I was in the
church was literally negative.
Even today its only analytical, actually putting there the death of
Mira, or any part of my life is zip, beyond horrifying. No willing to
take responsibility for. Wanna kill whoever was :)
> I am co-auditing for free, so it that okay?
As long as there are no agreements to not discuss one's own case or
gains or understandings out of session, except maybe for a sunsetable
while, and as long as both parties are considering they are getting a fair
exchange for the work they put into each other.
Remember as auditor, you can help forever for free, because its an
out flow. The practicality of doing so may be limited for he who would
outflow must inflow too.
But as a preclear, being helped and helped and helped, is a degrade
and eventually the preclear goes into a refused help.
Kids do this with their useless mothers, who won't let the kid help
himself, because the mother feels useless if the kid can be self
sufficient.
It's psycho, but the kid gets to refused to be helped, and starts
to feel useless also. This sits on top of volcanic matricidal feelings.
Homer
======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Wed Mar 20 11:47:41 EDT 2013
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore943.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFRSdodURT1lqxE3HERAj2KAJ9cByLuVuFc7nFU2YcqW9k/Pk1u0ACdHj66
C8HxnGbAYKxx2QbAGGU7D/w=
=d+rs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
OWNERSHIP, addendum to HOM7.memo
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
OWNERSHIIP
At its base, ownership means rights of control.
It helps to have the ability to control too, but ownership means
rights of control.
If I have the right to control something, others have the duty to
let me control it.
Duties and rights are fair chosen, they are negotiated between
parties to mutual satisfaction.
In the absence of others, rights and duties have no meaning.
For every right there is a duty and for every duty there is a
right.
You have a right to have duties, and you have a duty to have
rights.
Social justice is a fair chosen operating balance of duties and
rights.
Standard Adore stuff...
Ownership of a cognition means that you have the rights of control
over what to do with that cog, including talking about it with others or
forgetting it entirely.
Ownership can be taken away in at least two ways.
First simply by lack of fair exchange, even if the giving party
doesn't put any limitations on what you can do with the cog, the cat
that you owe them, means the cog isn't quite yours.
You buy a car with a promise to pay at a later date. Sure the car
is yours to drive, but if you don't pay, they can come take the car
back, so the car isn't really fully yours until the debt of havingness
is paid.
In the same way a preclear feels that the Master, auditor and C/S
have a lien of sorts on his case gain, until he can fully exchange for
it.
Knowing he is getting something for free will kill a session, but
paying money is only a token, and for preclears that realize this,
payingm money is not enough.
"COME ON DOWN TO DALLAS!"
Second ownership can be given away by agreement.
You go down to Alan Walter's Dallas Kowledgism Center and you sign
up to receive your Codes auditing. But before they will give it to you,
you must sign a non disclosure agreement, not only for the Codes that
you find about yourself, but also the tech they used to find them.
Thus the final result, your understanding of your most basic Codes,
do not belong to you to do with as you see fit.
And your actions in life are constrained by the enforced agreements
you had to make to get the auditing.
You notice how in the Church NO ONE EVER TALKS ABOUT THEIR CASE,
GAINS OR COGS IN OR OUT OF SESSION.
That's by agreement, but its enforced by threat of expulsion,
from the 'only game going'.
I remember vividly once at Flag I was suicidal and holding my head
in my hands in my head at the Fort Harrison, really at the end of my
last thread of string, and this high toned guy came up to me and tried to help.
A few minutes later, get got up to leave after having said to me:
PROBLEMS ONLY PERSIST TO THE DEGREE THAT YOU ARE WILLING TO
CONSIDER UNETHICAL SOLUTIONS TO THEM.
I looked at that, and tried to apply it, and over the years it has
molted to something different in my space having to do with ANDS, but
the point is the next day I saw the guy in Ethics talking out his
egregious violation of not sharing cogs or reality with anyone else.
Later someone came up to me and told me that what he had done was
NOT OK, their favorite term for being conscious and originating a
communication of worth, and that I shouldn't solicit, nor allow others,
to help me by giving me cogs.
I never forgot that lesson, OWERSHIP OF COGS BELONGS TO THE GIVER
NOT THE RECEIVER. At that moment I decided never to allow my
understandings of life to be owned by anyone for any reason, no matter
what the consequences.
It's not that help is bad, its that help with strings is bad.
I mean just how low does your pride level have to be that you will
sell a part of your soul in self constraints just to get your pride
back?
Certainly it might make sense in some things to have trademark
secrets and non disclosure agreements.
And certainly you were not FORCED to get your Codes from the
Knowledgism group, maybe you could have gotten them elsewhere.
And in any case, need does not bestow right, so just because you
NEED your codes to function again in the spiritual world, doesn't mean
anyone else has a duty to give them to you, nor help you get them
yourself, and so they are free to attach whatever strings or indentured
servitude for the rest of time they wish to the delivery of the services
you need and request of them.
This is simple good business sense.
And its a great way to own people, to get them to do you bidding,
and keep them from giving away the secrets of their tech so that their
income doesn't crash because suddenly just anyone can produces a cleared
Codee.
How does that make you feel?
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Wed Mar 20 11:36:21 EDT 2013
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore942.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFRSdd1URT1lqxE3HERAgm+AKCMHq+kRLU+Mk3idMW45UVuWT4OoACaAs9s
8gkr3Al3S9qYdppu3RR2zGA=
=eri+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
OWNERSHIIP
At its base, ownership means rights of control.
It helps to have the ability to control too, but ownership means
rights of control.
If I have the right to control something, others have the duty to
let me control it.
Duties and rights are fair chosen, they are negotiated between
parties to mutual satisfaction.
In the absence of others, rights and duties have no meaning.
For every right there is a duty and for every duty there is a
right.
You have a right to have duties, and you have a duty to have
rights.
Social justice is a fair chosen operating balance of duties and
rights.
Standard Adore stuff...
Ownership of a cognition means that you have the rights of control
over what to do with that cog, including talking about it with others or
forgetting it entirely.
Ownership can be taken away in at least two ways.
First simply by lack of fair exchange, even if the giving party
doesn't put any limitations on what you can do with the cog, the cat
that you owe them, means the cog isn't quite yours.
You buy a car with a promise to pay at a later date. Sure the car
is yours to drive, but if you don't pay, they can come take the car
back, so the car isn't really fully yours until the debt of havingness
is paid.
In the same way a preclear feels that the Master, auditor and C/S
have a lien of sorts on his case gain, until he can fully exchange for
it.
Knowing he is getting something for free will kill a session, but
paying money is only a token, and for preclears that realize this,
payingm money is not enough.
"COME ON DOWN TO DALLAS!"
Second ownership can be given away by agreement.
You go down to Alan Walter's Dallas Kowledgism Center and you sign
up to receive your Codes auditing. But before they will give it to you,
you must sign a non disclosure agreement, not only for the Codes that
you find about yourself, but also the tech they used to find them.
Thus the final result, your understanding of your most basic Codes,
do not belong to you to do with as you see fit.
And your actions in life are constrained by the enforced agreements
you had to make to get the auditing.
You notice how in the Church NO ONE EVER TALKS ABOUT THEIR CASE,
GAINS OR COGS IN OR OUT OF SESSION.
That's by agreement, but its enforced by threat of expulsion,
from the 'only game going'.
I remember vividly once at Flag I was suicidal and holding my head
in my hands in my head at the Fort Harrison, really at the end of my
last thread of string, and this high toned guy came up to me and tried to help.
A few minutes later, get got up to leave after having said to me:
PROBLEMS ONLY PERSIST TO THE DEGREE THAT YOU ARE WILLING TO
CONSIDER UNETHICAL SOLUTIONS TO THEM.
I looked at that, and tried to apply it, and over the years it has
molted to something different in my space having to do with ANDS, but
the point is the next day I saw the guy in Ethics talking out his
egregious violation of not sharing cogs or reality with anyone else.
Later someone came up to me and told me that what he had done was
NOT OK, their favorite term for being conscious and originating a
communication of worth, and that I shouldn't solicit, nor allow others,
to help me by giving me cogs.
I never forgot that lesson, OWERSHIP OF COGS BELONGS TO THE GIVER
NOT THE RECEIVER. At that moment I decided never to allow my
understandings of life to be owned by anyone for any reason, no matter
what the consequences.
It's not that help is bad, its that help with strings is bad.
I mean just how low does your pride level have to be that you will
sell a part of your soul in self constraints just to get your pride
back?
Certainly it might make sense in some things to have trademark
secrets and non disclosure agreements.
And certainly you were not FORCED to get your Codes from the
Knowledgism group, maybe you could have gotten them elsewhere.
And in any case, need does not bestow right, so just because you
NEED your codes to function again in the spiritual world, doesn't mean
anyone else has a duty to give them to you, nor help you get them
yourself, and so they are free to attach whatever strings or indentured
servitude for the rest of time they wish to the delivery of the services
you need and request of them.
This is simple good business sense.
And its a great way to own people, to get them to do you bidding,
and keep them from giving away the secrets of their tech so that their
income doesn't crash because suddenly just anyone can produces a cleared
Codee.
How does that make you feel?
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Wed Mar 20 11:36:21 EDT 2013
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore942.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFRSdd1URT1lqxE3HERAgm+AKCMHq+kRLU+Mk3idMW45UVuWT4OoACaAs9s
8gkr3Al3S9qYdppu3RR2zGA=
=eri+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)