SOURCE AND KNOW ABOUT
Homer:
>> To BE the infinite yes.
>> To KNOW the infinite, no.
>> Homer
CBWillis:
>You're certain you could not know this?
>Makes self-knowledge a lost cause then.
Knowledge is a yoke around the neck that sinks one into the sea
of oblivion with the weight of one's wisdom.
One can BE Source, the minute one KNOWS ABOUT Source one has begun
to indulge in pretty postulates that have little validity other than
what one assigns them.
Source does not need to knowing anything about itself in order to
operate, source knows how to operate natively without having to know
ABOUT how to operate natively. Just like a baby breathes, it knows how
to breath without knowing anything about breathing.
The process of enlightenment is the process of getting all
entangled up in 'knowing' the nature of Source, eventually one
realizes that one is creating this knowingness, and that which creates
knowingness is not knowable. It is BEable it. You are being it in
making postulates about it.
"The UnNameable dreams the Nameable."
"All of existence consists of Source speculating about itself.
Most of what it thinks is cute but wrong." - Adore
Those who think they are going to 'know something' at the end of
their journey might want to consider how deep one can sink under the
weight of their own knowledge.
Maybe one can know the infinite after all.
Presumably one will see the light before they get there.
Homer
>- CBW
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Sunday, February 5, 2017
Friday, February 3, 2017
ADORE315 (fwd)
SUB DEATH
The tone scale is a scale of wave frequencies that range from high
at the top to low at the bottom.
Waves are mathematical entities that change in time, usually from
positive to negative, up to down, or left to right, or something
similar.
Frequency is how often the wave does a complete cycle in a second.
Sound waves range from about 100 cycles/sec to 20,000 cycles/sec.
1 Hertz or Hz is 1 cycle/second, a KiloHz is 1000 cycles/sec, a
MegaHz is a million per second, GigaHz is a billion etc.
Radio waves go from about 500 KHz upto the GigaHz range, and Light
and X-rays are above that.
LRH kind of felt that emotions belonged in there somewhere, but
effort, emotion, thought and aesthetics may not be the same kind of wave
as electromagnetic radiation, but none the less, being a wave, it would
have the qualities of waves.
Waves have 3 basic qualities, frequency, amplitude and
interference.
Frequency is how often the wave cycles in Hertz.
Amplitude is how loud the wave is, or how big, or how far it swings
as it swings back and forth.
Interference is the result of two or more waves interacting with
each other producing harmonies and disharmonies.
First thing to notice is that a pure wave, usually a sine wave, is
always a harmony, as the only way you can have a disharmony is to have
two or more waves of different frequencies interacting.
Even then some mixtures produce richer harmonies, such as when you
mix a wave with one of its harmonics at 3/2 or 4/3 the frequency.
For example G and C on the piano are 3/2 and they form a perfect
fifth, so called because G is the 5th note in the C major scale.
But play C and some note that is 17/18's of C and you are going to
get a couple of cat's squalling.
Another thing about disharmonies is that some disharmonies can be
'resolved' into harmonies. The harmony that results is better off for
having been preceded by a disharmony. This gives disharmonies a 'raison
d'etre', a reason to be.
Finding a resolve for any particular disharmony is not easy, this
is what good art is about.
Find an exquisite disharmony, and then find an exquisite harmony to
resolve it.
Desire is for harmony, or for disharmonies that resolve into
harmonies.
Harmony is beauty, and disharmony is ugly.
Now generally people have 'high tone' confused with harmonious,
beautiful or pleasurable, and 'low tone' confused with disharmonious,
ugly or painful.
High tone means high frequency and low tone means low frequency.
Harmony, beauty and pleasure come either from single waves of *ANY*
frequency, or from discords and resolves of *ANY* frequency.
Thus one can take two very high tone beautiful waves and mix them
and get a very high tone ugly (undesirable) cacophony.
You see then that desire is for harmony and not for highness of
tone.
Now admittedly a high frequency single wave is more beautiful than
a low frequency single wave.
Get some regular sugar and some 10x sugar used for baking, and put
some of each on your tongue.
Both are sugar and both are sweet, but the 10x is a real trip, the
regular stuff is, well kind of normal.
So there is a natural tendency to want to go up the tone scale to
get to higher beauties, but if one is stuck in a high tone cacophony of
mixed waves of high frequency, then one can find solace in a harmony
lower down.
This is the essence of the tone scale trap.
Now Hubbard assigned various things to the various levels of the
tone scale, aesthetics and thought were way up, and then came action,
and pain, effort, and apathy and death and sub death etc.
Most of us consider that pain is undesirable, and would have a hard
time conceiving of beautiful or harmonious pain. But if pain is a
frequency of the tone scale, then as a PURE single frequency it would
have to be a harmony!
Mockup a harmonious pain.
Mockup a disharmonious pleasure.
So how come then pain is almost always a disharmony?
Because most body injuries consist of a complex mixture of many
slightly different incidents in restimulation resulting in a severe
disharmony of experience.
The worst disharmonies are mixtures of waves that are just slightly
off from each other in frequency.
Or try to listen to Chopin's and Tchaikovski's first piano
concertos together at the same time.
A body injury is sort of like hitting the keyboard with your fists,
of course you are going to get a loud disharmony.
One way to audit this is to take the injury and assess for HOW MANY
DIFFERENT FREQUENCIES MAKE UP THE PAIN.
Try it, the meter will read deeply when you get it right.
It may come out to a few or very many.
Say it comes out to 5.
Then one by one, or in groups, locate the single waves, or
harmonious collections of waves and run them out as beautiful pain.
Say two of the 5 were harmonics of each other, they would run out
together as a harmony of two different frequencies, leaving 3 left still
causing a disharmony.
Then two of them may run out again as a harmony of two waves,
leaving 1 left. Well that 1 HAS to be a harmony by definition, so run
it out the same way, and voila you have run out what looked like one god
awful disharmonious incident but which was in truth 3 separate harmonies
made of 5 different waves, making a disharmony.
In this way one runs out ugly undesirable pains, by separating them
into beautiful desirable components and running them instead.
If the pain isn't beautiful, it isn't ONE PAIN.
Trying to run it as one ugly pain won't work, as there is no such
thing.
OK so at the top of the tone scale the being creates in the mere
conception of things.
So one day he gets the idea of this great big beautiful space
forever for free with all these trees and flowers and green grass, and
scattered through out are these absolutely gorgeous little spiders,
trading jokes back and forth, each one preening itself, and gleaming in
the sun.
And he's just BEING there, and the space/time is just being there,
and the little spiders are all just being there having a good time.
You see that scene is a complex set of waves that all form a
gorgeous harmony for the being.
*THEN* he gets the idea that the spiders are dangerous and
poisonous and are out to get him. All of sudden, as one, the spiders
start to align in his direction and begin their approach.
He becomes absolutely certain that they are going crawl all over
him, go inside every body hole, bite him from the inside out, eat him,
and that he can't get away fast enough.
At that moment his space and time crystalize into hard persisting
rock and he can't make the scene disappear any more.
He can't wake up as he has fallen BELOW the original frequencies
that made up the original scene by adding in lower tone wave lengths.
Now he has a problem, and that problem consists of an even more
complex set of waves than the original scene, and that problem turns the
original gorgeous harmony into a deadly nightmare, a disharmony of
magnitude.
All he did was add some more waves into the original scene with his
postulates, waves that weren't quite in sync with his original scene,
and wham, he has a cacophony of terror and pain and undesirability like
has never been written in the books of man.
Remember the Wall of Fire.
This is the Wall of Bugs.
So he is still BEING there, counting the seconds to his assured
doom, and someone comes up behind him and taps him on the shoulder and
says 'Hey you see that small building over there, there is an arsenal of
anti spider bazookas in it, they are all locked up, but if we run and
break down the doors we will have enough weapons to kill all these
spiders no problem!"
All of a sudden his heart soars with *HOPE* again, for now he has a
possible solution to those spiders.
He has a game.
Lord save him.
So he has added in a whole mess more wavelengths into his scene
that have turned it from a nightmare disharmony of waiting to die, into
an exciting rip roaring fun time of killing and being killed.
Oh, he will recruit all his friends in to the war, they will
protect their women and children at all costs, they will devise better
weapons, and execute plans of daring do and kamikazee. The glory will
go down in history never to be matched again.
So what happened? Did he go up tone from the nightmare back into
being happy again at a higher tone?
No, he went downtone, he fell from a higher disharmony of being,
into a lower harmony of doing.
If he had gone up tone from the nightmare band he would have been
back where he could just change his mind about the scene and it would
have disappeared. BEING WOULD HAVE BEEN SUFFICIENT FOR THE SOLUTION.
Instead he fell down tone from the nightmare into a lower harmony
where DOING pretends to be sufficient for the solution.
Now DOING will NEVER be sufficient to any problem, any solution
created by doing will merely become another problem later on.
This is by sub intent by the way, the high tone original being
knows full well what he is doing even if he isn't consciously thinking
about it.
Thus by diving down tone from disharmonious being into harmonious
doing, he is guaranteeing to set himself up for a further disharmony at
the lower tone level when his solution finally becomes another problem.
He will then solve this new problem by falling down to an even
lower tone harmony with some new solution which then becomes another
problem later on and so forth.
So where is the guy headed at this point? Certainly not glory.
He is headed down into further problem disharmonies, solved by
LOWER TONE harmonies that then becomes LOWER TONE disharmonies, to be
solved by even LOWER TONE harmonies, until he goes out the bottom.
Assess for how many problem/solution cycles the guy is buried in
and you can spring him out of his present life which is a solution to
the problem of body death.
Notice we are not trying to exteriorize him from his *BODY*, we are
trying to exteriorize him from his *LIFE*. Oh hell, he can go back into
it any time he wants.
So a being creates a scene from a state of BEING.
This is a harmony.
Then he creates a problem in the scene from a state of BECOMING.
This is a lower disharmony.
Then he creates a solution in the scene from a state of DOINGNESS.
This is an even lower harmony.
And thus he has a game guaranteed never to end powered by the
dwindling spiral of problems and solutions which become problems etc.
Solutions based on BECOMINGNESS and DOING are headed down the
spiral.
Solutions based on BEING and finally not BEING (Native State) are
headed up the spiral.
BECOMINGNESS is in time, BEING is out of time.
So what is SUB DEATH?
Hubbard marked death of the body at 0.0 on the tone scale.
Now clearly the thetan survives the body death, there is the thetan
outside the body moping over a perfectly good lost body.
A PRECIOUS BODY THAT HE WILL NEVER SEE AGAIN, NEVER TO HARMONIZE
WITH HIM AGAIN.
And you wonder why he is a Black V.
0.0 maybe zero heartbeats a second for the body, but it certainly
is not zero cycles per second for the frequency of the thetan, far from
it.
Since the thetan is still there and clearly functioning the thetan
must be SOMEWHERE on the tone scale above absolute bottom at -400.0 on
the tone scale or spiritual death.
The thetan has a LONG ways to go between 0.0 body death and -400.0
spiritual death.
Now the death of the body is a PROBLEM to the thetan. Eventually
it became a SERIOUS problem to the thetan. More serious that even mere
mortals can conceive.
Early bodies were perfect and unique but fragile. They COULD live
forever, but once injured they would remain crippled FOREVER or even die
FOREVER.
We call this part of the track FRAGILE IMMORTALITIES.
Consequences became serious during this time of the track.
So when a thetan was at 0.0 on the tone scale with a dead body at
his feet, his one and only unique, never going to be another one like it
ever again, he was in sad shape.
I mean just think about your favorite dog or cat dying.
So he had a PROBLEM AND A DISHARMONY on the tone scale.
He eventually figured out all kinds of solutions to this problem,
most of which involved becoming the body itself and guiding it from
within, and losing sight of the distinction between the body and himself
to make himself more careful etc.
THE ENTIRE SUB DEATH AREA OF THE TONE SCALE IS JUST ONE THING:
TAKING CARE OF THE BODY AFTER HAVING DAMAGED A FEW TOO MANY.
These sub death solutions make him feel REALLY GOOD, and he was
just sure that they would end the problem forever for him.
But they were DOINGNESS solutions at a lower harmony on the tone
scale than death of the body. Thus the thetan entered into tone levels
BELOW 0.0 that were more harmonious at the time than what he was
experiencing at 0.0.
At 0.0 he's sad about the loss of an irreplacable love.
At -1.0 he's all happy and enthused about 'THAT will never happen
again!'.
He has found a solution to pity and those sad dying eyes looking at
him.
But man is he being CAREFUL.
Run happy carefulness, and happy carefreeness.
So SUB DEATH means that the thetan is living a solution to the
regretted death of prior bodies on the whole track.
HIS WHOLE LIFE IS A LOWER TONE HARMONY SOLUTION to the higher toned
disharmony of body death.
By slowing down his frequency the thetan has made himself feel
better by adding postulates of doingness on top of the insufferable
problem of BECOMINGNESS that he had with bodies dying on him.
Notice that BECOMINGNESS IS NOT BEING. BEING is free from
BECOMINGNESS.
BECOMINGNESS is BEING constrained by added considerations, like
"I am a goofball bumblefuck who couldn't keep a body alive if my
own life depended on it!"
But he's overjoyed at the chance to try, you see.
His BEING might have solved the problem for him, but his
BECOMINGNESS that he assigns to himself, sure as hell isn't, so he falls
to the lower harmony of 'going to DO something about it, by gum!'
So now he comes back AS a body, he has fallen from HAVING bodies to
BEING bodies, and he gets born and he is all Rah!, he is going to take
care of this body, and punish those that don't take care of their
bodies, hang them out on crosses as examples to show people what happens
if you don't take care of your body, make a fortune selling nails while
he is at it and keep his body well to do, and he's going to start and
finance a whole war against non body care-ers, and Oh the glory of
it...!
And he falls lower, and lower, and lower and lower.
Lower means slower, eventually he becomes a rock.
"Eventually all become marbles on the thetan plane..." - Adore.
So notice anyone who is IN a body is sub death. They are blaming,
shaming, protecting, controlling, owning, punishing, worshipping,
sacrificing themselves to, hiding in, being, or taking care of bodies.
Imagine being responsible for the death of an ant.
Now imagine being responsible for the death of a body.
See the difference?
'Tis why you are in a body and not an ant.
Eventually they can't even control a body any more, they can't BE a
body, so they become PARTS of bodies, they become OBJECTS, and
eventually they can't even do that and they fall down to can't hide, and
eventually spiritual death.
"Do with me what you will, I deserve it, good bye dear body, I am a
total failure, sorry I let you down."
So that is what sub death means.
It is actually sub problem, falling down from a disharmony of
PROBLEM BECOMINGNESS to a lower harmony of SOLUTION DOINGNESS.
He's feeling better for a while, but he's going slower.
Find anything the person is doing, especially the things he has
great enthusiasm and steely eyed determination for, and find out the
higher disharmony becomingness that the lower harmony doing is a
solution for.
The person will exteriorize from his SOLUTION DOINGNESS and from
his PROBLEM BECOMINGNESS and regain his restorative BEING where all
problems dissolve naturally.
E/P is astounding peace.
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Fri Feb 10 23:24:19 EST 2006
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Fri Feb 3 12:06:02 EST 2017
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore315.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFYlLh7URT1lqxE3HERAgQyAKC84syn7iBwRPoUyeB+528386kSNQCfWk3P
sYXWgCZVmZJyiySGPmTjdas=
=14fq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
The tone scale is a scale of wave frequencies that range from high
at the top to low at the bottom.
Waves are mathematical entities that change in time, usually from
positive to negative, up to down, or left to right, or something
similar.
Frequency is how often the wave does a complete cycle in a second.
Sound waves range from about 100 cycles/sec to 20,000 cycles/sec.
1 Hertz or Hz is 1 cycle/second, a KiloHz is 1000 cycles/sec, a
MegaHz is a million per second, GigaHz is a billion etc.
Radio waves go from about 500 KHz upto the GigaHz range, and Light
and X-rays are above that.
LRH kind of felt that emotions belonged in there somewhere, but
effort, emotion, thought and aesthetics may not be the same kind of wave
as electromagnetic radiation, but none the less, being a wave, it would
have the qualities of waves.
Waves have 3 basic qualities, frequency, amplitude and
interference.
Frequency is how often the wave cycles in Hertz.
Amplitude is how loud the wave is, or how big, or how far it swings
as it swings back and forth.
Interference is the result of two or more waves interacting with
each other producing harmonies and disharmonies.
First thing to notice is that a pure wave, usually a sine wave, is
always a harmony, as the only way you can have a disharmony is to have
two or more waves of different frequencies interacting.
Even then some mixtures produce richer harmonies, such as when you
mix a wave with one of its harmonics at 3/2 or 4/3 the frequency.
For example G and C on the piano are 3/2 and they form a perfect
fifth, so called because G is the 5th note in the C major scale.
But play C and some note that is 17/18's of C and you are going to
get a couple of cat's squalling.
Another thing about disharmonies is that some disharmonies can be
'resolved' into harmonies. The harmony that results is better off for
having been preceded by a disharmony. This gives disharmonies a 'raison
d'etre', a reason to be.
Finding a resolve for any particular disharmony is not easy, this
is what good art is about.
Find an exquisite disharmony, and then find an exquisite harmony to
resolve it.
Desire is for harmony, or for disharmonies that resolve into
harmonies.
Harmony is beauty, and disharmony is ugly.
Now generally people have 'high tone' confused with harmonious,
beautiful or pleasurable, and 'low tone' confused with disharmonious,
ugly or painful.
High tone means high frequency and low tone means low frequency.
Harmony, beauty and pleasure come either from single waves of *ANY*
frequency, or from discords and resolves of *ANY* frequency.
Thus one can take two very high tone beautiful waves and mix them
and get a very high tone ugly (undesirable) cacophony.
You see then that desire is for harmony and not for highness of
tone.
Now admittedly a high frequency single wave is more beautiful than
a low frequency single wave.
Get some regular sugar and some 10x sugar used for baking, and put
some of each on your tongue.
Both are sugar and both are sweet, but the 10x is a real trip, the
regular stuff is, well kind of normal.
So there is a natural tendency to want to go up the tone scale to
get to higher beauties, but if one is stuck in a high tone cacophony of
mixed waves of high frequency, then one can find solace in a harmony
lower down.
This is the essence of the tone scale trap.
Now Hubbard assigned various things to the various levels of the
tone scale, aesthetics and thought were way up, and then came action,
and pain, effort, and apathy and death and sub death etc.
Most of us consider that pain is undesirable, and would have a hard
time conceiving of beautiful or harmonious pain. But if pain is a
frequency of the tone scale, then as a PURE single frequency it would
have to be a harmony!
Mockup a harmonious pain.
Mockup a disharmonious pleasure.
So how come then pain is almost always a disharmony?
Because most body injuries consist of a complex mixture of many
slightly different incidents in restimulation resulting in a severe
disharmony of experience.
The worst disharmonies are mixtures of waves that are just slightly
off from each other in frequency.
Or try to listen to Chopin's and Tchaikovski's first piano
concertos together at the same time.
A body injury is sort of like hitting the keyboard with your fists,
of course you are going to get a loud disharmony.
One way to audit this is to take the injury and assess for HOW MANY
DIFFERENT FREQUENCIES MAKE UP THE PAIN.
Try it, the meter will read deeply when you get it right.
It may come out to a few or very many.
Say it comes out to 5.
Then one by one, or in groups, locate the single waves, or
harmonious collections of waves and run them out as beautiful pain.
Say two of the 5 were harmonics of each other, they would run out
together as a harmony of two different frequencies, leaving 3 left still
causing a disharmony.
Then two of them may run out again as a harmony of two waves,
leaving 1 left. Well that 1 HAS to be a harmony by definition, so run
it out the same way, and voila you have run out what looked like one god
awful disharmonious incident but which was in truth 3 separate harmonies
made of 5 different waves, making a disharmony.
In this way one runs out ugly undesirable pains, by separating them
into beautiful desirable components and running them instead.
If the pain isn't beautiful, it isn't ONE PAIN.
Trying to run it as one ugly pain won't work, as there is no such
thing.
OK so at the top of the tone scale the being creates in the mere
conception of things.
So one day he gets the idea of this great big beautiful space
forever for free with all these trees and flowers and green grass, and
scattered through out are these absolutely gorgeous little spiders,
trading jokes back and forth, each one preening itself, and gleaming in
the sun.
And he's just BEING there, and the space/time is just being there,
and the little spiders are all just being there having a good time.
You see that scene is a complex set of waves that all form a
gorgeous harmony for the being.
*THEN* he gets the idea that the spiders are dangerous and
poisonous and are out to get him. All of sudden, as one, the spiders
start to align in his direction and begin their approach.
He becomes absolutely certain that they are going crawl all over
him, go inside every body hole, bite him from the inside out, eat him,
and that he can't get away fast enough.
At that moment his space and time crystalize into hard persisting
rock and he can't make the scene disappear any more.
He can't wake up as he has fallen BELOW the original frequencies
that made up the original scene by adding in lower tone wave lengths.
Now he has a problem, and that problem consists of an even more
complex set of waves than the original scene, and that problem turns the
original gorgeous harmony into a deadly nightmare, a disharmony of
magnitude.
All he did was add some more waves into the original scene with his
postulates, waves that weren't quite in sync with his original scene,
and wham, he has a cacophony of terror and pain and undesirability like
has never been written in the books of man.
Remember the Wall of Fire.
This is the Wall of Bugs.
So he is still BEING there, counting the seconds to his assured
doom, and someone comes up behind him and taps him on the shoulder and
says 'Hey you see that small building over there, there is an arsenal of
anti spider bazookas in it, they are all locked up, but if we run and
break down the doors we will have enough weapons to kill all these
spiders no problem!"
All of a sudden his heart soars with *HOPE* again, for now he has a
possible solution to those spiders.
He has a game.
Lord save him.
So he has added in a whole mess more wavelengths into his scene
that have turned it from a nightmare disharmony of waiting to die, into
an exciting rip roaring fun time of killing and being killed.
Oh, he will recruit all his friends in to the war, they will
protect their women and children at all costs, they will devise better
weapons, and execute plans of daring do and kamikazee. The glory will
go down in history never to be matched again.
So what happened? Did he go up tone from the nightmare back into
being happy again at a higher tone?
No, he went downtone, he fell from a higher disharmony of being,
into a lower harmony of doing.
If he had gone up tone from the nightmare band he would have been
back where he could just change his mind about the scene and it would
have disappeared. BEING WOULD HAVE BEEN SUFFICIENT FOR THE SOLUTION.
Instead he fell down tone from the nightmare into a lower harmony
where DOING pretends to be sufficient for the solution.
Now DOING will NEVER be sufficient to any problem, any solution
created by doing will merely become another problem later on.
This is by sub intent by the way, the high tone original being
knows full well what he is doing even if he isn't consciously thinking
about it.
Thus by diving down tone from disharmonious being into harmonious
doing, he is guaranteeing to set himself up for a further disharmony at
the lower tone level when his solution finally becomes another problem.
He will then solve this new problem by falling down to an even
lower tone harmony with some new solution which then becomes another
problem later on and so forth.
So where is the guy headed at this point? Certainly not glory.
He is headed down into further problem disharmonies, solved by
LOWER TONE harmonies that then becomes LOWER TONE disharmonies, to be
solved by even LOWER TONE harmonies, until he goes out the bottom.
Assess for how many problem/solution cycles the guy is buried in
and you can spring him out of his present life which is a solution to
the problem of body death.
Notice we are not trying to exteriorize him from his *BODY*, we are
trying to exteriorize him from his *LIFE*. Oh hell, he can go back into
it any time he wants.
So a being creates a scene from a state of BEING.
This is a harmony.
Then he creates a problem in the scene from a state of BECOMING.
This is a lower disharmony.
Then he creates a solution in the scene from a state of DOINGNESS.
This is an even lower harmony.
And thus he has a game guaranteed never to end powered by the
dwindling spiral of problems and solutions which become problems etc.
Solutions based on BECOMINGNESS and DOING are headed down the
spiral.
Solutions based on BEING and finally not BEING (Native State) are
headed up the spiral.
BECOMINGNESS is in time, BEING is out of time.
So what is SUB DEATH?
Hubbard marked death of the body at 0.0 on the tone scale.
Now clearly the thetan survives the body death, there is the thetan
outside the body moping over a perfectly good lost body.
A PRECIOUS BODY THAT HE WILL NEVER SEE AGAIN, NEVER TO HARMONIZE
WITH HIM AGAIN.
And you wonder why he is a Black V.
0.0 maybe zero heartbeats a second for the body, but it certainly
is not zero cycles per second for the frequency of the thetan, far from
it.
Since the thetan is still there and clearly functioning the thetan
must be SOMEWHERE on the tone scale above absolute bottom at -400.0 on
the tone scale or spiritual death.
The thetan has a LONG ways to go between 0.0 body death and -400.0
spiritual death.
Now the death of the body is a PROBLEM to the thetan. Eventually
it became a SERIOUS problem to the thetan. More serious that even mere
mortals can conceive.
Early bodies were perfect and unique but fragile. They COULD live
forever, but once injured they would remain crippled FOREVER or even die
FOREVER.
We call this part of the track FRAGILE IMMORTALITIES.
Consequences became serious during this time of the track.
So when a thetan was at 0.0 on the tone scale with a dead body at
his feet, his one and only unique, never going to be another one like it
ever again, he was in sad shape.
I mean just think about your favorite dog or cat dying.
So he had a PROBLEM AND A DISHARMONY on the tone scale.
He eventually figured out all kinds of solutions to this problem,
most of which involved becoming the body itself and guiding it from
within, and losing sight of the distinction between the body and himself
to make himself more careful etc.
THE ENTIRE SUB DEATH AREA OF THE TONE SCALE IS JUST ONE THING:
TAKING CARE OF THE BODY AFTER HAVING DAMAGED A FEW TOO MANY.
These sub death solutions make him feel REALLY GOOD, and he was
just sure that they would end the problem forever for him.
But they were DOINGNESS solutions at a lower harmony on the tone
scale than death of the body. Thus the thetan entered into tone levels
BELOW 0.0 that were more harmonious at the time than what he was
experiencing at 0.0.
At 0.0 he's sad about the loss of an irreplacable love.
At -1.0 he's all happy and enthused about 'THAT will never happen
again!'.
He has found a solution to pity and those sad dying eyes looking at
him.
But man is he being CAREFUL.
Run happy carefulness, and happy carefreeness.
So SUB DEATH means that the thetan is living a solution to the
regretted death of prior bodies on the whole track.
HIS WHOLE LIFE IS A LOWER TONE HARMONY SOLUTION to the higher toned
disharmony of body death.
By slowing down his frequency the thetan has made himself feel
better by adding postulates of doingness on top of the insufferable
problem of BECOMINGNESS that he had with bodies dying on him.
Notice that BECOMINGNESS IS NOT BEING. BEING is free from
BECOMINGNESS.
BECOMINGNESS is BEING constrained by added considerations, like
"I am a goofball bumblefuck who couldn't keep a body alive if my
own life depended on it!"
But he's overjoyed at the chance to try, you see.
His BEING might have solved the problem for him, but his
BECOMINGNESS that he assigns to himself, sure as hell isn't, so he falls
to the lower harmony of 'going to DO something about it, by gum!'
So now he comes back AS a body, he has fallen from HAVING bodies to
BEING bodies, and he gets born and he is all Rah!, he is going to take
care of this body, and punish those that don't take care of their
bodies, hang them out on crosses as examples to show people what happens
if you don't take care of your body, make a fortune selling nails while
he is at it and keep his body well to do, and he's going to start and
finance a whole war against non body care-ers, and Oh the glory of
it...!
And he falls lower, and lower, and lower and lower.
Lower means slower, eventually he becomes a rock.
"Eventually all become marbles on the thetan plane..." - Adore.
So notice anyone who is IN a body is sub death. They are blaming,
shaming, protecting, controlling, owning, punishing, worshipping,
sacrificing themselves to, hiding in, being, or taking care of bodies.
Imagine being responsible for the death of an ant.
Now imagine being responsible for the death of a body.
See the difference?
'Tis why you are in a body and not an ant.
Eventually they can't even control a body any more, they can't BE a
body, so they become PARTS of bodies, they become OBJECTS, and
eventually they can't even do that and they fall down to can't hide, and
eventually spiritual death.
"Do with me what you will, I deserve it, good bye dear body, I am a
total failure, sorry I let you down."
So that is what sub death means.
It is actually sub problem, falling down from a disharmony of
PROBLEM BECOMINGNESS to a lower harmony of SOLUTION DOINGNESS.
He's feeling better for a while, but he's going slower.
Find anything the person is doing, especially the things he has
great enthusiasm and steely eyed determination for, and find out the
higher disharmony becomingness that the lower harmony doing is a
solution for.
The person will exteriorize from his SOLUTION DOINGNESS and from
his PROBLEM BECOMINGNESS and regain his restorative BEING where all
problems dissolve naturally.
E/P is astounding peace.
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Fri Feb 10 23:24:19 EST 2006
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Fri Feb 3 12:06:02 EST 2017
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore315.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFYlLh7URT1lqxE3HERAgQyAKC84syn7iBwRPoUyeB+528386kSNQCfWk3P
sYXWgCZVmZJyiySGPmTjdas=
=14fq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Wednesday, February 1, 2017
ACT78 (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
((My comments in double parentheses - Homer))
EXORCISM WANTED, CHEAP
Session Notes 09/14/94
ACT - 78
14 September 1994
Copyright (C) 1994 Homer Wilson Smith
Redistribution rights granted for non commercial purposes.
I had another Demon Dream last night. It was the result of my solo
session during the evening on Earlier Similar Universes and Withholds on
Interiorization.
Clustering, Joining, Merging, Melding are all forms of
interiorization with other beings. Some are aberrated, some are fair
chosen.
Anyhow in the dream I started to feel the usual forces in my body
when I start to have one of these things, terrible ripping and tearing
up and down my spine and crotch. I relaxed and let it take over.
Eventually the demon became half visible to me. It was behind me,
lifting my body into the air, and I was to some extent BEING it, as I
wanted to use its power.
The Demon was about 18 feet tall, with black sinews of living
steel, and the bat shaped wings classically attributed to such beings.
He was huge, and had tentacles of electricity all around him that I
had a hard time keeping off my balls!
I was having a very hard time controlling this demon, he had my
body in the air, which I wanted, but he was also hurting my body with
his tentacles, and I couldn't quite get him to stop doing it or to fully
cooperate. As Filbert says, joinings take place due to a common
intention, in this case I wanted to be able to operate the power of the
demon for myself, namely to lift my body and take me where I wanted to
go through the air, flying in other words.
I didn't have any particular place I wanted to go, and I forgot
completely that these guys usually have someplace THEY want me to go.
So I was not relaxed and cooperative enough with this guy, so we got
into a struggle. He sort of won.
I did not have the presence of mind to ask him "What are you?" or
"Who are you?", nor did I have my spray can of Jesus Blood to spray in
his face.
I can see though, that if I have to contend with these guys on my
death bed, I will be screaming bloody murder just as Ron purportedly
was.
Perhaps I will be able to remember the magic words if I paste them
on the ceiling near by bed,
"I am bought by the blood of Jesus, let me go!"
Anyhow, is anyone selling Exorcisms cheap?
No serious offer refused....
As a bonus, if you succeed, you get to keep the Demon.
Homer
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Wed Feb 1 12:06:03 EST 2017
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/act78.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFYkhV7URT1lqxE3HERAh3xAJ9sDoutJOOTHOgEdxUx+BFg+AOBjACgn9vH
h3iztNUP6uGJRPXWLUnWK/8=
=sPk4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
((My comments in double parentheses - Homer))
EXORCISM WANTED, CHEAP
Session Notes 09/14/94
ACT - 78
14 September 1994
Copyright (C) 1994 Homer Wilson Smith
Redistribution rights granted for non commercial purposes.
I had another Demon Dream last night. It was the result of my solo
session during the evening on Earlier Similar Universes and Withholds on
Interiorization.
Clustering, Joining, Merging, Melding are all forms of
interiorization with other beings. Some are aberrated, some are fair
chosen.
Anyhow in the dream I started to feel the usual forces in my body
when I start to have one of these things, terrible ripping and tearing
up and down my spine and crotch. I relaxed and let it take over.
Eventually the demon became half visible to me. It was behind me,
lifting my body into the air, and I was to some extent BEING it, as I
wanted to use its power.
The Demon was about 18 feet tall, with black sinews of living
steel, and the bat shaped wings classically attributed to such beings.
He was huge, and had tentacles of electricity all around him that I
had a hard time keeping off my balls!
I was having a very hard time controlling this demon, he had my
body in the air, which I wanted, but he was also hurting my body with
his tentacles, and I couldn't quite get him to stop doing it or to fully
cooperate. As Filbert says, joinings take place due to a common
intention, in this case I wanted to be able to operate the power of the
demon for myself, namely to lift my body and take me where I wanted to
go through the air, flying in other words.
I didn't have any particular place I wanted to go, and I forgot
completely that these guys usually have someplace THEY want me to go.
So I was not relaxed and cooperative enough with this guy, so we got
into a struggle. He sort of won.
I did not have the presence of mind to ask him "What are you?" or
"Who are you?", nor did I have my spray can of Jesus Blood to spray in
his face.
I can see though, that if I have to contend with these guys on my
death bed, I will be screaming bloody murder just as Ron purportedly
was.
Perhaps I will be able to remember the magic words if I paste them
on the ceiling near by bed,
"I am bought by the blood of Jesus, let me go!"
Anyhow, is anyone selling Exorcisms cheap?
No serious offer refused....
As a bonus, if you succeed, you get to keep the Demon.
Homer
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Wed Feb 1 12:06:03 EST 2017
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/act78.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFYkhV7URT1lqxE3HERAh3xAJ9sDoutJOOTHOgEdxUx+BFg+AOBjACgn9vH
h3iztNUP6uGJRPXWLUnWK/8=
=sPk4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Monday, January 30, 2017
DISCOUNT (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
SCALE of DISCOUNT
Dead
There is no problem.
There is a problem but no solution.
There is a problem and a solution but no one will ever find it.
There is a problem and a solution and someone may find it.
There is a problem and a solution and someone will find it but
not me.
There is a problem and a solution and I may find it.
There is a problem and a solution and I will find it.
There is a solution but no problem so I will create one.
There is no solution and no problem and I can and may or may not
create either.
I can't imagine what a problem is.
P.S.
There is also,
There is a problem and a solution and ONLY I will find it.
There is a problem and a solution and ONLY I won't find it.
From Adore, stolen from Transactional Analysis.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Mon Jan 30 12:06:03 EST 2017
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/discount
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFYj3J7URT1lqxE3HERAvZPAJ955MrU3tBCMGGDPJwGHu6gNjqCPwCgw+Gg
3NRkikZHE7UZMjWvPv1Lfq0=
=le8H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
SCALE of DISCOUNT
Dead
There is no problem.
There is a problem but no solution.
There is a problem and a solution but no one will ever find it.
There is a problem and a solution and someone may find it.
There is a problem and a solution and someone will find it but
not me.
There is a problem and a solution and I may find it.
There is a problem and a solution and I will find it.
There is a solution but no problem so I will create one.
There is no solution and no problem and I can and may or may not
create either.
I can't imagine what a problem is.
P.S.
There is also,
There is a problem and a solution and ONLY I will find it.
There is a problem and a solution and ONLY I won't find it.
From Adore, stolen from Transactional Analysis.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Mon Jan 30 12:06:03 EST 2017
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/discount
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFYj3J7URT1lqxE3HERAvZPAJ955MrU3tBCMGGDPJwGHu6gNjqCPwCgw+Gg
3NRkikZHE7UZMjWvPv1Lfq0=
=le8H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Sunday, January 29, 2017
RHO (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
RHO
> what does "scalar" mean then? that something has no dimensions, or no
> extension?
It means no dimension. One has to have 1 or more dimensions to have
extension in that/those dimensions. You can only have 0 or more extension
if you have a dimension to have the extension in.
Mathematically a scalar is a point or single number, no matter
how long like pi etc.
One asks how thick is a line? One might be tempted to say, zero
thickness, but this is incorrect, as a line doesn't have a thickness
dimension in which to have zero thickness. One has to HAVE a dimension
before one can have zero extension.
A 2x2 2 dimensional piece of gold is not zero thick in the third
dimension. If it were, it would be a 2x2x0 3 dimensional piece of gold,
which would actually be no gold at all as 2x2x0 = 0.
A 2x2 2 dimensional piece of gold however is definitely some gold,
albeit 2 dimensional :)
Same with a scalar, it is not a 3 dimensional 0x0x0 entity, nor
a 2 dimensional 0x0 entity nor even a line of 0 length. It is
a zero dimensional entity.
In APL, a programming langauge, the AxBxC is called the rho of the
object, denoted {a,b,c}.
A 3 dimensional object has 3 members in its rho, one for
each dimension. Thus a {2,3,4} is a 2 by 3 by 4 object.
A 2 dimensional object has 2 members i.e. {2,3} which is
a 2 by 3 object.
A 1 dimensional object has 1 member, ie {3} which is a 3 unit
object.
A 0 dimensional object has 0 members in its rho, its rho
is the empty set. {zip}
Thus a {0,0,0} 3 dimensional object, which is in fact
a nothing of no substance, is not the same as a {zip} scalar
object of definite substance.
People have a hard time picturing a scalar universe, as their
consciousness is capable of only picturing 3D spaces. So they mock
up a 0x0x0 'point' of 3D space and miss entirely what an infinite
scalar universe might be like.
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sun Jan 29 12:06:02 EST 2017
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/rho
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFYjiD7URT1lqxE3HERAuolAKCwKMBCKN59WQ9Gw0LCt9y29T6ASQCgmbFu
GCFuf/nj167lAgrTKxjYhgc=
=s4+S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
RHO
> what does "scalar" mean then? that something has no dimensions, or no
> extension?
It means no dimension. One has to have 1 or more dimensions to have
extension in that/those dimensions. You can only have 0 or more extension
if you have a dimension to have the extension in.
Mathematically a scalar is a point or single number, no matter
how long like pi etc.
One asks how thick is a line? One might be tempted to say, zero
thickness, but this is incorrect, as a line doesn't have a thickness
dimension in which to have zero thickness. One has to HAVE a dimension
before one can have zero extension.
A 2x2 2 dimensional piece of gold is not zero thick in the third
dimension. If it were, it would be a 2x2x0 3 dimensional piece of gold,
which would actually be no gold at all as 2x2x0 = 0.
A 2x2 2 dimensional piece of gold however is definitely some gold,
albeit 2 dimensional :)
Same with a scalar, it is not a 3 dimensional 0x0x0 entity, nor
a 2 dimensional 0x0 entity nor even a line of 0 length. It is
a zero dimensional entity.
In APL, a programming langauge, the AxBxC is called the rho of the
object, denoted {a,b,c}.
A 3 dimensional object has 3 members in its rho, one for
each dimension. Thus a {2,3,4} is a 2 by 3 by 4 object.
A 2 dimensional object has 2 members i.e. {2,3} which is
a 2 by 3 object.
A 1 dimensional object has 1 member, ie {3} which is a 3 unit
object.
A 0 dimensional object has 0 members in its rho, its rho
is the empty set. {zip}
Thus a {0,0,0} 3 dimensional object, which is in fact
a nothing of no substance, is not the same as a {zip} scalar
object of definite substance.
People have a hard time picturing a scalar universe, as their
consciousness is capable of only picturing 3D spaces. So they mock
up a 0x0x0 'point' of 3D space and miss entirely what an infinite
scalar universe might be like.
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sun Jan 29 12:06:02 EST 2017
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/rho
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFYjiD7URT1lqxE3HERAuolAKCwKMBCKN59WQ9Gw0LCt9y29T6ASQCgmbFu
GCFuf/nj167lAgrTKxjYhgc=
=s4+S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
ACT4 (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
POWER PROCESS FOUR
ACT - 4
20 June 1993
Copyright (C) 1993 Homer Wilson Smith
Redistribution rights granted for non commercial purposes.
> Basically it's plastered in every Church's ethics office. The
>Process is one question repeated over and over again until you stumble
>onto the answer. At which point you will think you have had a
>cognition!! The question is "Tell me a source.".
There are 6 process to Power or Grade V.
The 4th process in the series of six is,
"Tell me a Source."
"Tell me about it."
"Tell me a no Source."
"Tell me about it."
Or,
"Spot a Source."
"Tell me about it."
"Spot a no Source."
"Tell me about it."
The purpose of running the six power processes is revivification of
the most detested incident on the track. One of the End Phenomenon of
Power is 'Ability to handle Power. Freedom from detested parts of the
track.'
It is very possible that any one person has an analytical
understanding in present time that he is indeed a source, but it is a
far different matter to maintain that awareness during the worst engram
you ever went through in all time (whole track).
Engrams are moments of being an effect, of thinking that you AREN'T
source. The fact that the incident is still unconfrontable and remains
unerased in your bank (you can't remember it right?), means that you
still consider THAT moment of time to be something that you aren't
source of. After such an incident people try to reclaim their
Sovereignty by forgetting or nailing out of existence the incident that
made them the most wrong about being a source.
The PICTURES of the incident are as bad as the incident to them.
So it gets NOT-ISed. Bye bye memory.
It's a deceit, which is why they aren't clear.
Further when things happen in present time that beset the pc with
trouble, pain, travail, loss and sorrow, he again feels that he is not
source, not source of what ails him, or is besetting him, and not source
of being in an arena (universe) where he can be so beset.
These moments restimulate the forgotten most detested parts of his
track, a moment where he was CERTAIN that he was not source, such as a
time of Crucifixion, or worse before bodies.
Thus the end phenomenon of Power is the revivification of one's
worst incident of not being source, of detesting source forever for
free, or what ever is source, and wishing to hell it never happened. A
being that has successfully run Power, (very few) have a widely expanded
sense of what they are source of including the incident they most
considered they weren't source of when it happened.
Thus although your raw meat pc may have some inkling that he is a
source, he considers himself to be a very SMALL source among very BIG
other sources, many of them detested.
After Power, the pc considers that he is a very BIG source, and
that no source is detested. This is beyond most people's imagination,
and certainly is beyond the Church's ability to run properly.
Which is why they can't handle power, but abuse it instead.
Until a pc has been properly set up for Power Processes, he can't
handle them either, they just won't run or will run glibly.
He will get a 'big deal' reaction out of them, rather than a reviv
of his most detested part of the track.
Power gets you Uncrucified for the first time in 100 billion years.
It also returns the ability to Handle Power, because your own
personal power flow is no longer all tied up denying that the detested
incident ever happened (the seed of Corruption) and following that, no
longer protecting your own ass from future similar incidents AT ALL
COSTS (Temptation and Seduction.)
Like all Scientology processes, the higher on the Bridge you go,
the simpler they get. The simplicity is deceiving to the lower level pc
as he expects enormous complexity to help him out of his perceived mess.
And like all higher level Scientology processes, simple though they
may be, they depend absolutely on all lower processes having been run
properly and thoroughly, or else the high level process will not bite.
Homer
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Fri Jan 27 12:06:03 EST 2017
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/act4.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFYi337URT1lqxE3HERAoTUAJ9sRToYQzaHsTNDOooBPKxvuZdYcwCfX2F2
qsS50KbNDu6kbKlfXPFrZo4=
=yKwb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
POWER PROCESS FOUR
ACT - 4
20 June 1993
Copyright (C) 1993 Homer Wilson Smith
Redistribution rights granted for non commercial purposes.
> Basically it's plastered in every Church's ethics office. The
>Process is one question repeated over and over again until you stumble
>onto the answer. At which point you will think you have had a
>cognition!! The question is "Tell me a source.".
There are 6 process to Power or Grade V.
The 4th process in the series of six is,
"Tell me a Source."
"Tell me about it."
"Tell me a no Source."
"Tell me about it."
Or,
"Spot a Source."
"Tell me about it."
"Spot a no Source."
"Tell me about it."
The purpose of running the six power processes is revivification of
the most detested incident on the track. One of the End Phenomenon of
Power is 'Ability to handle Power. Freedom from detested parts of the
track.'
It is very possible that any one person has an analytical
understanding in present time that he is indeed a source, but it is a
far different matter to maintain that awareness during the worst engram
you ever went through in all time (whole track).
Engrams are moments of being an effect, of thinking that you AREN'T
source. The fact that the incident is still unconfrontable and remains
unerased in your bank (you can't remember it right?), means that you
still consider THAT moment of time to be something that you aren't
source of. After such an incident people try to reclaim their
Sovereignty by forgetting or nailing out of existence the incident that
made them the most wrong about being a source.
The PICTURES of the incident are as bad as the incident to them.
So it gets NOT-ISed. Bye bye memory.
It's a deceit, which is why they aren't clear.
Further when things happen in present time that beset the pc with
trouble, pain, travail, loss and sorrow, he again feels that he is not
source, not source of what ails him, or is besetting him, and not source
of being in an arena (universe) where he can be so beset.
These moments restimulate the forgotten most detested parts of his
track, a moment where he was CERTAIN that he was not source, such as a
time of Crucifixion, or worse before bodies.
Thus the end phenomenon of Power is the revivification of one's
worst incident of not being source, of detesting source forever for
free, or what ever is source, and wishing to hell it never happened. A
being that has successfully run Power, (very few) have a widely expanded
sense of what they are source of including the incident they most
considered they weren't source of when it happened.
Thus although your raw meat pc may have some inkling that he is a
source, he considers himself to be a very SMALL source among very BIG
other sources, many of them detested.
After Power, the pc considers that he is a very BIG source, and
that no source is detested. This is beyond most people's imagination,
and certainly is beyond the Church's ability to run properly.
Which is why they can't handle power, but abuse it instead.
Until a pc has been properly set up for Power Processes, he can't
handle them either, they just won't run or will run glibly.
He will get a 'big deal' reaction out of them, rather than a reviv
of his most detested part of the track.
Power gets you Uncrucified for the first time in 100 billion years.
It also returns the ability to Handle Power, because your own
personal power flow is no longer all tied up denying that the detested
incident ever happened (the seed of Corruption) and following that, no
longer protecting your own ass from future similar incidents AT ALL
COSTS (Temptation and Seduction.)
Like all Scientology processes, the higher on the Bridge you go,
the simpler they get. The simplicity is deceiving to the lower level pc
as he expects enormous complexity to help him out of his perceived mess.
And like all higher level Scientology processes, simple though they
may be, they depend absolutely on all lower processes having been run
properly and thoroughly, or else the high level process will not bite.
Homer
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Fri Jan 27 12:06:03 EST 2017
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/act4.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFYi337URT1lqxE3HERAoTUAJ9sRToYQzaHsTNDOooBPKxvuZdYcwCfX2F2
qsS50KbNDu6kbKlfXPFrZo4=
=yKwb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
ADORE806 (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
10/09/10 Saturday 8:26pm EST
12/08/16 Thursday 4:56pm EST
C/S FOR ROLAND II, Part 3
Roland Berry experienced an exteriorization with full perception
during routine auditing ca. 1999 and wrote up his experiences to the
net.
http://www.clearing.org/cgi/archive.cgi?/homer/roland0.memo
Not only did he experience a full exteriorization, he WENT exterior
on the exact right buttons laid out by LRH in the 50's, namely,
affinity, nosympathy, sympathy, propitiation, BEING a body.
Apparently however, over time Roland lost reality on his own
experience, and started to publicly berate auditing, dianetics, and
scientology, started demanding proof etc, and eventually became one of
the biggest meatball basher assholes in the history of the net.
Eventually I kind of had it with him, feeling that his direct
experience of something man as longed for, for thousands of years, was
wasted on a useless pinheaded nitwit.
So I started to write up a set of postings detailing a C/S for him
to rehab his experience and get certainty back on the subjects of
dianetics and scientology.
(A C/S is a program of auditing written by a preclear's Case
Supervisor in order to handle the next step in auditing or to repair a
prior step gone wrong.)
These postings are here:
C/S FOR ROLAND
http://www.clearing.org/cgi/archive.cgi?/homer/roland
C/S FOR ROLAND II Part 1
http://www.clearing.org/cgi/archive.cgi?/homer/adore615.memo
C/S FOR ROLAND II Part 2
http://www.clearing.org/cgi/archive.cgi?/homer/adore616.memo
This posting continues where the last one left off, and was
inspired by ADORE86.memo which was recently posted to the net.
ADORE86.memo
http://www.clearing.org/cgi/archive.cgi?/homer/adore86.memo
We have come a long ways since ADORE86.memo and I can now speak to
some of the problems mentioned there, mostly the unrunability and
unauditability of some items, particularly solo.
QUESTION AND ANSWERS
The first important advance is a better understanding of the nature
of Questions and Answers and the effect they have on a case, something
mentioned in detail in adore86.memo, without full awareness of just how
right it was.
I have gone into this in endless detail in recent postings, so I
will sum it up by saying that the target of auditing is an incident.
An incident is *DEFINED* as a run in with a question causing a
persistence via a prior postulate or consideration that 'things do not
vanish on their own'. The question is usually of the form 'what to do
about it' or one of its many endless variety.
The question "what to DO about it" bypasses the earlier charge on
the prior postulate (called a God Postulate because it works) by putting
the preclear's attention on the future where 'doing something about it'
is hoped to have vanished the problem with the original condition.
So we have in time order:
Condition, failure of some kind.
Postulate that the condition is not caused by a postulate and thus
no postulate can be vanished to handle it.
Question: What to DO about it, where DO is defined as futher
creations of effort in the future to destroy or ameliorate the now
persisting condition.
Answers galore, each one creating solutions to the original problem
which then become problems themselves inviting more questions about what
to DO about them etc, forever.
The above cycle violates the basic truth that one can never vanish
a creation by creating something MORE in the future.
The exact prior condition, failure, postulate and consideration
followed by the exact question and pursuant answers and actions and
estimated future time to solution, need to be recovered to fully erase
the incident.
A Postulate is a posted beingness, something that is there because
you say it is there and you are looking at it. It is looking by knowing
or
KNOWING -> LOOKING (Looking by Knowing)
Know first, see second. Knowing gives rise to looking.
Imagination works this way, things are created to look at in the
very conception of them?
Looking by Knowing is contrasted to Knowing by Looking, or
learning.
LOOKING -> KNOWING (Knowing by Looking).
Look first, know second. Looking gives rise to knowing.
Observations of the physical universe work this way.
A consideration is the postulation of a relationship between two or
more posted beingnesses.
Postulate: This is a cigarette
Postulate: This is an ashtray
Consideration: Ashtrays are used to hold cigarette ashes.
Postulation and consideration are often used interchangeably to
little harm, but in truth considerations are a subset of postulates, as
they are postulates that relate two other standalone postulates to each
other.
Consideration comes from CON SIDE, to put together, or to relate
two standalone postulates to each other.
The consideration that posted things are not self vanishing,
becomes part of a God postulate conglomerate because things ARE self
vanishing until the preclear gets the consideration they aren't.
Thus the God postulate that postulates do not work, works.
The God postulate that we need something ELSE or MORE than just
upostulating creates then the entire future time track of problems
begetting solutions becoming problems begetting more solutions.
Later in time observation of the now unwanted posted beingness
still persisting in time, is then used as evidence to the effect that
things are indeed not self vanishing, and away we go down the time
track.
Thus consideration and observation are dicoms.
The consideration that things do not vanish on their own, plus the
*LATER* observation that things do seem to be persisting on their own to
back it up, is known as the Consideration/Observation flip flop.
Consideration is cause and means I consider it is there, therefore
it is there. That's looking by knowing. Knowing is cause, and looking
is effect.
Observation is effect and means I consider it is there, BECAUSE I
looked and observed it was there. That's knowing by looking, or
learning. Looking is cause and knowing is effect gleaned from looking.
Consideration is 'It is there because I consider it is there.'
Observation is 'I consider it is there because I observe it is
there.'
Consideration says that consideration is cause, until it says LATER
that consideration is not cause.
Observation agrees that consideration is not cause, and provides
evidence that consideration is instead the effect of something already
existing before it was observed or even known to exist.
The observation of the continued persistence of the thing provides
evidence for the truth of the (false) consideration that things do not
vanish on their own, and thus he proves himself into a persisting trap.
LATER observations of persistence are used as conclusive proof
that the persistence was not caused by a self vanishing postulate
in the first place.
This is HOW self vanishing postulates are made to persist!
Things do not vanish on their own because he considers that things
do not vanish on their own, and his observation of those things
persisting verifies it for him that things do not vanish on their own.
So now he has happily verified that he is stuck with a persistence
forever, because things which persist, persist, and that is all there is
to it.
Try to knock out time sometime, and see how far you get.
So there.
Time is the ultimate persisting 'thing'.
He goes from a self vanishing postulate to a consideration that it
won't vanish, to an observation of it persisting, to a an unwanted
persistence, to a question about what to do about it.
This produces a locked down persistence and travels in time away
from the original postulate which in the end is the source of the whole
travail.
Let's do this again for posterities sake.
There are two phases to the consideration/observation flip flop.
In phase A the being is going, there is a pink elephant,
there is a pink elephant, there is a pink elephant, and so he has
a non self persisting pink elephant because he keeps putting it there
as fast as it can self vanish.
But he know that the pink elephant is there BECAUSE he knows
the pink elephant is there.
He is thinking,
I see a pink elephant, knowingness creates beingness.
BUt then he goes I
It is the question that locks it all down into persistence with Q&A
away from pure as-isness of the original postulate.
Vanishing something through as-isness of its original moment of
creation is NOT asking a question about what to do about it.
You see?
Question asking is death when it comes to trying to vanish
something that was created but now is no longer wanted.
The correct way to vanish anything created thing is to be at the
moment of its original creation, be creating it again, and let go of it,
minus all the consideratorial nonsense about things not vanishing on
their own, and especially minus all the question asking about what to do
about its persistence.
Formally we say that the question and answer that he comes up with
(to DO something about it) commits efforts to the idea that the original
postulate won't vanish on his own. The more he DOES to solve that
persistence, the more he commits to the consideration it is not self
vanishing.
Until he has committed effort to solving the unwanted postulate,
his second postulate that the first one won't just vanish on its own is
still tenuous.
He could still flip back to the moment of creation and
let go, not enough time has passed to confuse things.
And it's 'light time' between the postulate and the consideration
it won't vanish, unlike the heavy time that gets created once he gets
into question asking and using effort to make the original postulate not
be any more through change, destruction and outright not-isness.
Once he commits to effort, he *COMMITS* to time and pursuit and he
moves further and further away from as-isness of the original postulate,
thus making it more and more impossible to as-is and vanish.
As-isness of the original postulate exists only at the moment
of original creation.
The further in time he goes away from that moment the more
he has traveled into alter-isness and thus persisting is-ness,
and eventually not-isness.
Q&A stands for Question and Answer, but means veering off course
into new questions without having dealt with the first one.
Such a person starting off at A going to B, has trouble going to B,
so he goes to C. But then he has trouble going to C and so starts for
D. He NEVER gets anywhere he intends to go, but is ALWAYS continuing to
go somewhere new, never getting there either.
No rest, never arrives.
This is a Q&A artist. Every time he changes course he creates
trails of persistence behind him. Eventually he gets buried in them.
Thus the structure of a God postulate is like this:
Postulate -> Consideration -> Observation -> Question -> Answer ->
pursuit and execution of answer via effort in time.
Effort and pursuit creates time, chase and eventual total failure
to vanish an unwanted persistence.
Since the way out is the original way in, the more TIME a being
spends looking for a way out, the further he gets from the original way
in.
Time is a practical joke of magnitude.
NO AND SOME
The second important advance is an understanding of NO and SOME and
how to run them.
The problem with almost all of Church auditing is it only assesses
for and runs the SOME and ignores the NO.
So you ask for 'Hate?' and there is no read, but the auditor
doesn't ask for 'NO Hate?' and so they miss the item entirely.
The problem is worse though, you have to assess for NO hate first!
And if perchance 'Hate' read, you would have to start running NO
hate anyhow right off, because the hate already has flowed in the
original assessment and NO hate is waiting to run next.
If you lose sync between NO and SOME, the item will dry up and
never read again.
If you assess or run the NO item first, the SOME item will then
read and run. For a while. Then you have to go back to the NO item,
then the SOME item again, back and forth and stay in SYNC with the flows
that are happening.
So what happens is after hundreds of hours of normal auditing, all
the isness side of the preclear's items are pretty well flattened as far
as they could be, but the not-isness side of those same items has been
left restimulated but not pulled.
This acts as a missed withhold, creates an ARC break and results in
a blow, leaving the session, leaving auditing, and leaving the Church
who 'couldn't pull a missed withhold if their lives depended on it'.
The SOME item isn't the withhold! The NO item is.
SOME item, some lying, some cheating, some stealing, some murder,
some death, damnation and demise, who cares. If the preclear knows
about it or can access it easily, it just doesn't amount to a hill of
beans no matter how many people are missing it, or he isn't talking to
them about it.
You can run this kind of 'Has a withhold been missed?' forever, and
the preclear will just go lower and lower and lower until you don't have
a preclear any more.
He's taken up dealing drugs in Bangladesh, you see?
But ask him 'Is there a NO missed withhold?' and watch what
happens.
Standard Tech tries to do this with Suppressed and Invalidated, but
neither of them are NO.
And neither are the 20 other items on the standard prepcheck
list, all of which try to mean NO without being NO!
Prepcheck means checking preperatory to clearing and are used
heavily to get a preclear into session and do simply Life Repairs etc.
THE PREPCHECK BUTTONS
http://www.clearing.org/cgi/archive.cgi?/electra/exm10.memo
The first set of buttons are the standard tech buttons, the rest
were added by the Freezone later, although all are part of LRH tech
in some measure or another.
Talk about missing or bypassing an entire case.
It's not enough to have written the right thing in some corner of a
book, where its importance is completely bypassed or missed.
So its kind of built into their tech, not intentionally, but the
result is the same, NO tech, NO preclears, NO auditing, NO wins and NO
Church.
Here is what happens. Your preclear has interiorized and
exteriorized thousands of times along the whole track, into bodies, out
of bodies, into groups, out of groups, into objects, out of objects,
into memories, out of memories, into universes, out of universe. Just
on and on and on.
50 percent of these are on the isness side of his case, if you ask
him about it, there it is and he will tell you about it. He may have to
dig for it, its charged, he doesn't want to talk about it, but he can
get at it.
The other 50 percent of these are on the not-isness side of his
case, and if you ask him about it, he will give you a blank stare, say
'What exteriorization?' and take a loss.
HE CAN'T GET AT A NO ITEM WITHOUT RUNNING NO ITEM!
Dig it and don't leave it.
He can't contact the not-ised exteriorizations, because they are
not-ised, covered in black, mass and charge, BUT HE CAN CONTACT THE NOT
IS!
The not-is is right there in front of his face.
So instead of saying to him 'Tell me about an exteriorization', you
say instead 'Tell me about NO exteriorization.'
Now you might ask, if he can't contact the exteriorization because
it is not-ised, how can he tell you about it, and guess what, you would
be 100 percent right.
WE DO NOT WANT HIM TO TELL US ABOUT THE EXTERIORIZATION, WE WANT
HIM TO TELL US ABOUT THE NO SITTING ON TOP OF THE EXTERIORIZATION.
Now remember NO means pretended no, remember the CDEINR scale.
Curious about, Desire, Enforce, Inhibit, NO, Refused.
If there were truly a no exteriorization, then the needle would
float as there is nothing there to run.
But if its a not-ised exteriorization then the needle will stop and
fall and get dirty and dance the polka, whistle dixie, play Beethoven's
5th, and the pc will still say 'nothing there'.
He's lying of course, but its what appears to him as the truth, he
can't get at it, and he is totally not sure it is there.
That's because the way to get inside a not-isness is NOT to look
real hard into the darkness and hope to see what is behind it, in it, or
under it. THAT DOES NOT WORK.
A preclear can out not-is himself all day long, for the rest of
time, forever for free.
THE STATIC IS AN EXPERT AT CREATING LOSS AS LOSS AND NOT HAVING IS
WHAT IT CREATES!
Source sources what Source is not.
What source is not is time.
Time is having, via chase and not having.
Thus time is 100 percent wanting and not having and hoping
to get via committed effort.
Believe me SOURCE HAS.
And what Source has is the ability to not have.
Not-isness is a form of pretending to not have what you actually
have, the few times Source messes up and you actually have it!
That's a joke, actually not-isness is often used against
things you have that you don't want, Source is good at that too.
Thus the way to deal with a not-isness is MAKE MORE NOT-ISNESS!
It doesn't matter what is under the not-isness, maybe its an
exteriorization, maybe its not, maybe its beautiful, maybe its ugly, but
once he contacts the not-isness, AS NOT-ISNESS, it will start to run,
flow and lift. Then whatever is under it will in due time become
visible.
Of course he will just shut it out again, but now the jig is up,
now he KNOWS he is not-ising it and will keep control over the matter
for a while.
Now again you might ask, well if he is not-ising the
exteriorization, or what ever item you are asking for, how does he know
that the not-isness he is running is THAT particular not-isness?
Good question. The answer is, it doesn't matter, whatever
not-isness he ends up running is THE not-isness that he needs to run,
next, and if its not an exteriorization under it, but a pink elephant,
well then you probably should be running pink elephants anyhow, instead
of exteriorization.
Running the not-isness will tell you in the end what isness you
should be running.
But really if exteriorization is the next item that needs to be
run, and you ask for NO exteriorization, the file clerk will be damn
sure to hand it to your preclear, because he is sitting in the NO as the
next layer of blackness to be as-ised.
(The file clerk is a Dianetic mechanism that hands the preclear the
next incident necessary to resolve his case, if asked to do so by the
auditor.)
If you don't believe in the file clerk, then believe in yourself,
if the item you are running is truly the next correct item to run, then
the NO item will blow off with complete certainty and amazement, and
will allow the SOME item to continue to run.
Now look this is important, I am not making a big deal over this
for nothing, NO and SOME are the make break between a running case and a
pissed off pc.
Remember in the old days you were told that an ARC broken pc won't
read on the meter?
In fact an ARC broken pc will not read on a meter so much that his
needle will float!
That's called an ARC break float, and must never, ever, ever be
confused with a true float which results from VGI's (very good
indicators) smiling, laughing, cogniting, going WOW! this is great etc.
So why doesn't an ARC broken pc read on a meter?
There he is sitting in front of you, kind of dead, maybe glum or
glowering, and you say,
"Is there an ARC break?"
Well you know not to take up non reading items, but just in case
you also check,
"On the question is there an ARC break, has anything been
Suppressed?"
"On the question, is there an ARC break, has anything been
Invalidated?"
But nothing reads, so the auditor goes on. He writes down there is
no read, but ALSO NO FLOAT, so he knows he is going to have to come back
to it sooner or later, perhaps after he has messed up the preclear more
with present time problems and withholds.
BUT HOW CAN ASKING FOR AN ARC BREAK READ, IF ARC BROKEN PRECLEARS
DON'T READ ON THE METER!?
Sometimes you have to put the meter away, and audit what you see in
front of you, "You LOOK ARC broken dude, so tell me about it whether you
are or not!", but let's take a deeper look at this.
Say the ARC break did read, and Goober says yeah, I am ARC broke
with Dufus.
So now you know that ARC is made of Affinity, Reality and
Communication, so somewhere Goober got pissed off or sad about Dufus and
went out of affinity, out of agreement (reality) or out of
communication, certainly all 3, but maybe one more than the other.
So you start to assess for which was it mostly, was it affinity,
was it reality, was it communication?
Goober says "Oh yes, its reality, Dufus thinks global warming is
all a bunch of bunk invented by the greenies to stop our God given
rights to produce and conquer the Earth!"
You say 'Thank you, now let's find out just how ARC broken
you are by that reality.'
Was it a curious about a reality?
Was it a desired reality?
Was it an enforced reality?
Was it an inhibited reality?
Was is a NO reality?
Was it a refused reality?
Goober says, "Oh yeah it was an enforced reality, he was pushing it
so hard, making cracks about anyone who disagreed with him, insulting
anyone who brought up data about it etc."
You say "Thank you, was there an earlier similar ARC break?"
and away you go to finish the ruds with a floating needle before
you begin session proper.
(Ruds are rudiments before starting a session, cleaning up ARC
breaks, Present Time Problems (PTP's) and missed Withholds.)
But now let's take a different example.
An ARC break consists of Affinity, Reality and Communication where
each of the 3 legs is somewhere on the CDEINR scale.
So say instead Goober happens to have an ARC break of long duration
where EACH OF THE LEGS IS DOWN AT NO!
NO affinity, NO reality, NO communication.
So you ask Goober "Is there an ARC break?" and he just looks at
you, and says NO, and the needle does not read nor float, and session
goes no where.
So you get this evil grin on your face, you put on your atomic
protective clothing, you stand back a few feet from the meter, you get
your preclear's undivided attention, and you say,
"Goober is there a NO ARC break?"
Once the smoke has cleared, the fuses in the building replaced, and
you have a new e-meter, you will then find Goober more than willing and
interested to run,
"Get the idea of NO ARC break."
"Get the idea of SOME ARC break."
And you know he will be all smiles from there on out.
THE STRUCTURE OF NOT-IS
OK, there is one more thing that is important here.
Your average woggy on the street doesn't know he has a case.
He has a NO case.
He is completely oblivious to the fact that he has dicoms he is
dramatizing and their items, but that most of them are in a state of NO
item.
(A dicom is a DIchotomy of Comparable but Opposite Magnitude).
He knows he gets mad once in a while or sad, but he has not the
faintest slightest clue that these are but fumaroles blowing off steam
on the side of a NO volcano of charge, emotion, grief, anguish, turmoil
and eternal hell forever.
That's why he is mortal in his own mind, that's a kind of NO
Immortality, NO hell forever, NO thank God!
Now a well trained preclear will understand after a few hours of
auditing that he has many SOME items and many NO items. All it takes is
finding one NO item and he's hooked on finding more, the relief is so
great.
So this preclear is now living with SOME SOME items, and SOME NO
ITEMS, and he is happy with that.
But the unaudited woggy doesn't know this, he is living with NO
SOME items, and NO NO items!
He doesn't know that he doesn't know, that's a NO NO item.
No if you think about it, if you really want to forget something,
you ALSO need to forget that you wanted to forget it!
Thus as soon as you create a NO item, you HAVE to create a NO NO
item to make the NO item stick, or else it will just come up to the
surface again the next time you sneeze.
But even the NO NO item won't stick forever, you have to forget
that too, so now you have a NO NO NO item. You see how this goes?
So in fact when a being gets dead serious about never knowing about
something never again, he creates an infinite regression of ... NO NO NO
NO item, which puts the power of the infinite behind that forgetfulness.
This infinite regression is part of what keeps time going, because
NO is another layer of effort committed to covering over the item, and
then covering over the covering over,etc forever.
As your preclear starts to run NO items, he will suddenly start to
contact the infinite regression and his time and space will rock and
start to expand significantly.
This can be dangerous, so watch it.
If your preclear goes wildly unstable, just continue to run NO and
SOME. He can stabilize anything with NO for a while, then SOME for a
while etc.
Remember also that at the craziest part of his core, the part that
really starts him swirling and swimming in dizziness, he is running both
NO *AND* SOME on the same item at the same time.
We used to talk about the poor guy who came to a fork in the
road and couldn't decide whether to go left or right. So eventually
he built a house at the fork, and decided to live there for
rest of his life.
He got stuck in an indecision, and yes building the house
was pure Q&A from getting on with going where he was going.
But he's not insane. He's stuck in an indecision to
go left *OR* go right.
The indecision is not only not insane, it isn't unethical
either, because its not illogical, and ethics is logic.
But his indecision is problematic in that his life stops
at that point and he does something else.
But imagine now that rather than settle for an unending
indecision to left or right, he makes a DECISION to go BOTH
left *AND* right.
Now he is insane, because he can't do that, and its not logical,
and thus it is unethical, and this is beginning of hysteria and all out
loss of control.
So just so is your preclear doing a item *AND* NOT item on various
things, he is also doing a NO *AND* SOME on both the item AND its
opposite.
NO *AND* SOME on love *AND* hate for mother.
This is the beginning of hysteria and insanity, because he can't
open and close the door at the same time, but the way to stabilize it is
to DO IT knowingly. Just get the idea of NO *AND* SOME of the item at
the same time, and it will stabilize and he can let go of it SLOWLY and
under control.
The destabilization comes from letting go of the nut and fruit
factory too fast.
He starts to feel unstable with all this hysteria energy swirling
around him, making his dizzy and nauseous, and he starts to panic and
starts asking questions "What should I do?!!!!" which is NOT what he
should do. He should get the idea of NO AND SOME item at the same time,
and keep doing that, and he will maintain control, and not die on you.
OK, so we didn't know all that back in adore86.memo.
That was hard won knowledge, I am lucky to be sitting here writing
this.
The important part is, that if you don't run the NO, the preclear
will start to fall into the NO anyhow and eventually blow.
(Blow means leave, leave his post, leave his friends, his auditor,
auditing, and eventually the Church).
Say you are running exteriorization, and you run it and you run it,
and the preclear exteriorizes, full perception, lights on bright in the
room even if the lights are off, moves out of his body, over across the
street, and sees all kinds of things, remote reports back and proves
each and every one of them, and then comes back into his body, and you
continue to run ext, ext, ext, ext.
Two weeks later, you are talking to this preclear and you say 'Hey
Goober I heard you exteriorized in session!"
Goober says "Yeah, well, I don't really believe in exteriorization,
there's all kinds of mental phenomenon that you really just can't say
whether its real or not."
And you say "What? What about all those things you saw outside and
could prove?"
And Goober says "Prove? Oh well, right, prove, can we talk about
this later? Thanks..."
See? Goober has had so much SOME exteriorization run that he is
now totally swamped in the missed wittholds of NO exteriorizations,
charge restimulated by auditing SOME, but not pulled by failing to run
NO.
So you grab Goober and put him back into session, and you ask him
"Tell me about NO exteriorization".
The room goes dark, blackness forever runs out and covers the
earth, and 3 hours later all the dark matter in the universe is glowing
bright, and he is so exteriorized you don't know which galaxy he is in,
or which time line.
So this is an important phenomenon. Particularly if you consider
that 'case gain' is an item, and what the consequences of failing to run
NO case gain will be to your clearing production line.
Not to mention what the consequences of failing to run NO
exteriorization on Roland will be to your future reputation in his field.
OK, take a break, donuts and coffee for everyone!
Homer
Sat Oct 9 20:51:05 EDT 2010
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Thu Dec 8 12:06:02 EST 2016
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore806.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFYSZL7URT1lqxE3HERApMuAJ0bzfaQw5M7Wvne1XuTfKZve4YdSwCdHiX8
QHUE2ck/clKizuiMJSvjLts=
=yk+8
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Sun Jan 29 14:57:59 EST 2017
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore806.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFYjklHURT1lqxE3HERAtoJAJ9J8OFhXkB75tQU+4unWojGmMm7CQCgw0OM
QfBK4jj0VT8RxcZAoawAlkE=
=4FFZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
10/09/10 Saturday 8:26pm EST
12/08/16 Thursday 4:56pm EST
C/S FOR ROLAND II, Part 3
Roland Berry experienced an exteriorization with full perception
during routine auditing ca. 1999 and wrote up his experiences to the
net.
http://www.clearing.org/cgi/archive.cgi?/homer/roland0.memo
Not only did he experience a full exteriorization, he WENT exterior
on the exact right buttons laid out by LRH in the 50's, namely,
affinity, nosympathy, sympathy, propitiation, BEING a body.
Apparently however, over time Roland lost reality on his own
experience, and started to publicly berate auditing, dianetics, and
scientology, started demanding proof etc, and eventually became one of
the biggest meatball basher assholes in the history of the net.
Eventually I kind of had it with him, feeling that his direct
experience of something man as longed for, for thousands of years, was
wasted on a useless pinheaded nitwit.
So I started to write up a set of postings detailing a C/S for him
to rehab his experience and get certainty back on the subjects of
dianetics and scientology.
(A C/S is a program of auditing written by a preclear's Case
Supervisor in order to handle the next step in auditing or to repair a
prior step gone wrong.)
These postings are here:
C/S FOR ROLAND
http://www.clearing.org/cgi/archive.cgi?/homer/roland
C/S FOR ROLAND II Part 1
http://www.clearing.org/cgi/archive.cgi?/homer/adore615.memo
C/S FOR ROLAND II Part 2
http://www.clearing.org/cgi/archive.cgi?/homer/adore616.memo
This posting continues where the last one left off, and was
inspired by ADORE86.memo which was recently posted to the net.
ADORE86.memo
http://www.clearing.org/cgi/archive.cgi?/homer/adore86.memo
We have come a long ways since ADORE86.memo and I can now speak to
some of the problems mentioned there, mostly the unrunability and
unauditability of some items, particularly solo.
QUESTION AND ANSWERS
The first important advance is a better understanding of the nature
of Questions and Answers and the effect they have on a case, something
mentioned in detail in adore86.memo, without full awareness of just how
right it was.
I have gone into this in endless detail in recent postings, so I
will sum it up by saying that the target of auditing is an incident.
An incident is *DEFINED* as a run in with a question causing a
persistence via a prior postulate or consideration that 'things do not
vanish on their own'. The question is usually of the form 'what to do
about it' or one of its many endless variety.
The question "what to DO about it" bypasses the earlier charge on
the prior postulate (called a God Postulate because it works) by putting
the preclear's attention on the future where 'doing something about it'
is hoped to have vanished the problem with the original condition.
So we have in time order:
Condition, failure of some kind.
Postulate that the condition is not caused by a postulate and thus
no postulate can be vanished to handle it.
Question: What to DO about it, where DO is defined as futher
creations of effort in the future to destroy or ameliorate the now
persisting condition.
Answers galore, each one creating solutions to the original problem
which then become problems themselves inviting more questions about what
to DO about them etc, forever.
The above cycle violates the basic truth that one can never vanish
a creation by creating something MORE in the future.
The exact prior condition, failure, postulate and consideration
followed by the exact question and pursuant answers and actions and
estimated future time to solution, need to be recovered to fully erase
the incident.
A Postulate is a posted beingness, something that is there because
you say it is there and you are looking at it. It is looking by knowing
or
KNOWING -> LOOKING (Looking by Knowing)
Know first, see second. Knowing gives rise to looking.
Imagination works this way, things are created to look at in the
very conception of them?
Looking by Knowing is contrasted to Knowing by Looking, or
learning.
LOOKING -> KNOWING (Knowing by Looking).
Look first, know second. Looking gives rise to knowing.
Observations of the physical universe work this way.
A consideration is the postulation of a relationship between two or
more posted beingnesses.
Postulate: This is a cigarette
Postulate: This is an ashtray
Consideration: Ashtrays are used to hold cigarette ashes.
Postulation and consideration are often used interchangeably to
little harm, but in truth considerations are a subset of postulates, as
they are postulates that relate two other standalone postulates to each
other.
Consideration comes from CON SIDE, to put together, or to relate
two standalone postulates to each other.
The consideration that posted things are not self vanishing,
becomes part of a God postulate conglomerate because things ARE self
vanishing until the preclear gets the consideration they aren't.
Thus the God postulate that postulates do not work, works.
The God postulate that we need something ELSE or MORE than just
upostulating creates then the entire future time track of problems
begetting solutions becoming problems begetting more solutions.
Later in time observation of the now unwanted posted beingness
still persisting in time, is then used as evidence to the effect that
things are indeed not self vanishing, and away we go down the time
track.
Thus consideration and observation are dicoms.
The consideration that things do not vanish on their own, plus the
*LATER* observation that things do seem to be persisting on their own to
back it up, is known as the Consideration/Observation flip flop.
Consideration is cause and means I consider it is there, therefore
it is there. That's looking by knowing. Knowing is cause, and looking
is effect.
Observation is effect and means I consider it is there, BECAUSE I
looked and observed it was there. That's knowing by looking, or
learning. Looking is cause and knowing is effect gleaned from looking.
Consideration is 'It is there because I consider it is there.'
Observation is 'I consider it is there because I observe it is
there.'
Consideration says that consideration is cause, until it says LATER
that consideration is not cause.
Observation agrees that consideration is not cause, and provides
evidence that consideration is instead the effect of something already
existing before it was observed or even known to exist.
The observation of the continued persistence of the thing provides
evidence for the truth of the (false) consideration that things do not
vanish on their own, and thus he proves himself into a persisting trap.
LATER observations of persistence are used as conclusive proof
that the persistence was not caused by a self vanishing postulate
in the first place.
This is HOW self vanishing postulates are made to persist!
Things do not vanish on their own because he considers that things
do not vanish on their own, and his observation of those things
persisting verifies it for him that things do not vanish on their own.
So now he has happily verified that he is stuck with a persistence
forever, because things which persist, persist, and that is all there is
to it.
Try to knock out time sometime, and see how far you get.
So there.
Time is the ultimate persisting 'thing'.
He goes from a self vanishing postulate to a consideration that it
won't vanish, to an observation of it persisting, to a an unwanted
persistence, to a question about what to do about it.
This produces a locked down persistence and travels in time away
from the original postulate which in the end is the source of the whole
travail.
Let's do this again for posterities sake.
There are two phases to the consideration/observation flip flop.
In phase A the being is going, there is a pink elephant,
there is a pink elephant, there is a pink elephant, and so he has
a non self persisting pink elephant because he keeps putting it there
as fast as it can self vanish.
But he know that the pink elephant is there BECAUSE he knows
the pink elephant is there.
He is thinking,
I see a pink elephant, knowingness creates beingness.
BUt then he goes I
It is the question that locks it all down into persistence with Q&A
away from pure as-isness of the original postulate.
Vanishing something through as-isness of its original moment of
creation is NOT asking a question about what to do about it.
You see?
Question asking is death when it comes to trying to vanish
something that was created but now is no longer wanted.
The correct way to vanish anything created thing is to be at the
moment of its original creation, be creating it again, and let go of it,
minus all the consideratorial nonsense about things not vanishing on
their own, and especially minus all the question asking about what to do
about its persistence.
Formally we say that the question and answer that he comes up with
(to DO something about it) commits efforts to the idea that the original
postulate won't vanish on his own. The more he DOES to solve that
persistence, the more he commits to the consideration it is not self
vanishing.
Until he has committed effort to solving the unwanted postulate,
his second postulate that the first one won't just vanish on its own is
still tenuous.
He could still flip back to the moment of creation and
let go, not enough time has passed to confuse things.
And it's 'light time' between the postulate and the consideration
it won't vanish, unlike the heavy time that gets created once he gets
into question asking and using effort to make the original postulate not
be any more through change, destruction and outright not-isness.
Once he commits to effort, he *COMMITS* to time and pursuit and he
moves further and further away from as-isness of the original postulate,
thus making it more and more impossible to as-is and vanish.
As-isness of the original postulate exists only at the moment
of original creation.
The further in time he goes away from that moment the more
he has traveled into alter-isness and thus persisting is-ness,
and eventually not-isness.
Q&A stands for Question and Answer, but means veering off course
into new questions without having dealt with the first one.
Such a person starting off at A going to B, has trouble going to B,
so he goes to C. But then he has trouble going to C and so starts for
D. He NEVER gets anywhere he intends to go, but is ALWAYS continuing to
go somewhere new, never getting there either.
No rest, never arrives.
This is a Q&A artist. Every time he changes course he creates
trails of persistence behind him. Eventually he gets buried in them.
Thus the structure of a God postulate is like this:
Postulate -> Consideration -> Observation -> Question -> Answer ->
pursuit and execution of answer via effort in time.
Effort and pursuit creates time, chase and eventual total failure
to vanish an unwanted persistence.
Since the way out is the original way in, the more TIME a being
spends looking for a way out, the further he gets from the original way
in.
Time is a practical joke of magnitude.
NO AND SOME
The second important advance is an understanding of NO and SOME and
how to run them.
The problem with almost all of Church auditing is it only assesses
for and runs the SOME and ignores the NO.
So you ask for 'Hate?' and there is no read, but the auditor
doesn't ask for 'NO Hate?' and so they miss the item entirely.
The problem is worse though, you have to assess for NO hate first!
And if perchance 'Hate' read, you would have to start running NO
hate anyhow right off, because the hate already has flowed in the
original assessment and NO hate is waiting to run next.
If you lose sync between NO and SOME, the item will dry up and
never read again.
If you assess or run the NO item first, the SOME item will then
read and run. For a while. Then you have to go back to the NO item,
then the SOME item again, back and forth and stay in SYNC with the flows
that are happening.
So what happens is after hundreds of hours of normal auditing, all
the isness side of the preclear's items are pretty well flattened as far
as they could be, but the not-isness side of those same items has been
left restimulated but not pulled.
This acts as a missed withhold, creates an ARC break and results in
a blow, leaving the session, leaving auditing, and leaving the Church
who 'couldn't pull a missed withhold if their lives depended on it'.
The SOME item isn't the withhold! The NO item is.
SOME item, some lying, some cheating, some stealing, some murder,
some death, damnation and demise, who cares. If the preclear knows
about it or can access it easily, it just doesn't amount to a hill of
beans no matter how many people are missing it, or he isn't talking to
them about it.
You can run this kind of 'Has a withhold been missed?' forever, and
the preclear will just go lower and lower and lower until you don't have
a preclear any more.
He's taken up dealing drugs in Bangladesh, you see?
But ask him 'Is there a NO missed withhold?' and watch what
happens.
Standard Tech tries to do this with Suppressed and Invalidated, but
neither of them are NO.
And neither are the 20 other items on the standard prepcheck
list, all of which try to mean NO without being NO!
Prepcheck means checking preperatory to clearing and are used
heavily to get a preclear into session and do simply Life Repairs etc.
THE PREPCHECK BUTTONS
http://www.clearing.org/cgi/archive.cgi?/electra/exm10.memo
The first set of buttons are the standard tech buttons, the rest
were added by the Freezone later, although all are part of LRH tech
in some measure or another.
Talk about missing or bypassing an entire case.
It's not enough to have written the right thing in some corner of a
book, where its importance is completely bypassed or missed.
So its kind of built into their tech, not intentionally, but the
result is the same, NO tech, NO preclears, NO auditing, NO wins and NO
Church.
Here is what happens. Your preclear has interiorized and
exteriorized thousands of times along the whole track, into bodies, out
of bodies, into groups, out of groups, into objects, out of objects,
into memories, out of memories, into universes, out of universe. Just
on and on and on.
50 percent of these are on the isness side of his case, if you ask
him about it, there it is and he will tell you about it. He may have to
dig for it, its charged, he doesn't want to talk about it, but he can
get at it.
The other 50 percent of these are on the not-isness side of his
case, and if you ask him about it, he will give you a blank stare, say
'What exteriorization?' and take a loss.
HE CAN'T GET AT A NO ITEM WITHOUT RUNNING NO ITEM!
Dig it and don't leave it.
He can't contact the not-ised exteriorizations, because they are
not-ised, covered in black, mass and charge, BUT HE CAN CONTACT THE NOT
IS!
The not-is is right there in front of his face.
So instead of saying to him 'Tell me about an exteriorization', you
say instead 'Tell me about NO exteriorization.'
Now you might ask, if he can't contact the exteriorization because
it is not-ised, how can he tell you about it, and guess what, you would
be 100 percent right.
WE DO NOT WANT HIM TO TELL US ABOUT THE EXTERIORIZATION, WE WANT
HIM TO TELL US ABOUT THE NO SITTING ON TOP OF THE EXTERIORIZATION.
Now remember NO means pretended no, remember the CDEINR scale.
Curious about, Desire, Enforce, Inhibit, NO, Refused.
If there were truly a no exteriorization, then the needle would
float as there is nothing there to run.
But if its a not-ised exteriorization then the needle will stop and
fall and get dirty and dance the polka, whistle dixie, play Beethoven's
5th, and the pc will still say 'nothing there'.
He's lying of course, but its what appears to him as the truth, he
can't get at it, and he is totally not sure it is there.
That's because the way to get inside a not-isness is NOT to look
real hard into the darkness and hope to see what is behind it, in it, or
under it. THAT DOES NOT WORK.
A preclear can out not-is himself all day long, for the rest of
time, forever for free.
THE STATIC IS AN EXPERT AT CREATING LOSS AS LOSS AND NOT HAVING IS
WHAT IT CREATES!
Source sources what Source is not.
What source is not is time.
Time is having, via chase and not having.
Thus time is 100 percent wanting and not having and hoping
to get via committed effort.
Believe me SOURCE HAS.
And what Source has is the ability to not have.
Not-isness is a form of pretending to not have what you actually
have, the few times Source messes up and you actually have it!
That's a joke, actually not-isness is often used against
things you have that you don't want, Source is good at that too.
Thus the way to deal with a not-isness is MAKE MORE NOT-ISNESS!
It doesn't matter what is under the not-isness, maybe its an
exteriorization, maybe its not, maybe its beautiful, maybe its ugly, but
once he contacts the not-isness, AS NOT-ISNESS, it will start to run,
flow and lift. Then whatever is under it will in due time become
visible.
Of course he will just shut it out again, but now the jig is up,
now he KNOWS he is not-ising it and will keep control over the matter
for a while.
Now again you might ask, well if he is not-ising the
exteriorization, or what ever item you are asking for, how does he know
that the not-isness he is running is THAT particular not-isness?
Good question. The answer is, it doesn't matter, whatever
not-isness he ends up running is THE not-isness that he needs to run,
next, and if its not an exteriorization under it, but a pink elephant,
well then you probably should be running pink elephants anyhow, instead
of exteriorization.
Running the not-isness will tell you in the end what isness you
should be running.
But really if exteriorization is the next item that needs to be
run, and you ask for NO exteriorization, the file clerk will be damn
sure to hand it to your preclear, because he is sitting in the NO as the
next layer of blackness to be as-ised.
(The file clerk is a Dianetic mechanism that hands the preclear the
next incident necessary to resolve his case, if asked to do so by the
auditor.)
If you don't believe in the file clerk, then believe in yourself,
if the item you are running is truly the next correct item to run, then
the NO item will blow off with complete certainty and amazement, and
will allow the SOME item to continue to run.
Now look this is important, I am not making a big deal over this
for nothing, NO and SOME are the make break between a running case and a
pissed off pc.
Remember in the old days you were told that an ARC broken pc won't
read on the meter?
In fact an ARC broken pc will not read on a meter so much that his
needle will float!
That's called an ARC break float, and must never, ever, ever be
confused with a true float which results from VGI's (very good
indicators) smiling, laughing, cogniting, going WOW! this is great etc.
So why doesn't an ARC broken pc read on a meter?
There he is sitting in front of you, kind of dead, maybe glum or
glowering, and you say,
"Is there an ARC break?"
Well you know not to take up non reading items, but just in case
you also check,
"On the question is there an ARC break, has anything been
Suppressed?"
"On the question, is there an ARC break, has anything been
Invalidated?"
But nothing reads, so the auditor goes on. He writes down there is
no read, but ALSO NO FLOAT, so he knows he is going to have to come back
to it sooner or later, perhaps after he has messed up the preclear more
with present time problems and withholds.
BUT HOW CAN ASKING FOR AN ARC BREAK READ, IF ARC BROKEN PRECLEARS
DON'T READ ON THE METER!?
Sometimes you have to put the meter away, and audit what you see in
front of you, "You LOOK ARC broken dude, so tell me about it whether you
are or not!", but let's take a deeper look at this.
Say the ARC break did read, and Goober says yeah, I am ARC broke
with Dufus.
So now you know that ARC is made of Affinity, Reality and
Communication, so somewhere Goober got pissed off or sad about Dufus and
went out of affinity, out of agreement (reality) or out of
communication, certainly all 3, but maybe one more than the other.
So you start to assess for which was it mostly, was it affinity,
was it reality, was it communication?
Goober says "Oh yes, its reality, Dufus thinks global warming is
all a bunch of bunk invented by the greenies to stop our God given
rights to produce and conquer the Earth!"
You say 'Thank you, now let's find out just how ARC broken
you are by that reality.'
Was it a curious about a reality?
Was it a desired reality?
Was it an enforced reality?
Was it an inhibited reality?
Was is a NO reality?
Was it a refused reality?
Goober says, "Oh yeah it was an enforced reality, he was pushing it
so hard, making cracks about anyone who disagreed with him, insulting
anyone who brought up data about it etc."
You say "Thank you, was there an earlier similar ARC break?"
and away you go to finish the ruds with a floating needle before
you begin session proper.
(Ruds are rudiments before starting a session, cleaning up ARC
breaks, Present Time Problems (PTP's) and missed Withholds.)
But now let's take a different example.
An ARC break consists of Affinity, Reality and Communication where
each of the 3 legs is somewhere on the CDEINR scale.
So say instead Goober happens to have an ARC break of long duration
where EACH OF THE LEGS IS DOWN AT NO!
NO affinity, NO reality, NO communication.
So you ask Goober "Is there an ARC break?" and he just looks at
you, and says NO, and the needle does not read nor float, and session
goes no where.
So you get this evil grin on your face, you put on your atomic
protective clothing, you stand back a few feet from the meter, you get
your preclear's undivided attention, and you say,
"Goober is there a NO ARC break?"
Once the smoke has cleared, the fuses in the building replaced, and
you have a new e-meter, you will then find Goober more than willing and
interested to run,
"Get the idea of NO ARC break."
"Get the idea of SOME ARC break."
And you know he will be all smiles from there on out.
THE STRUCTURE OF NOT-IS
OK, there is one more thing that is important here.
Your average woggy on the street doesn't know he has a case.
He has a NO case.
He is completely oblivious to the fact that he has dicoms he is
dramatizing and their items, but that most of them are in a state of NO
item.
(A dicom is a DIchotomy of Comparable but Opposite Magnitude).
He knows he gets mad once in a while or sad, but he has not the
faintest slightest clue that these are but fumaroles blowing off steam
on the side of a NO volcano of charge, emotion, grief, anguish, turmoil
and eternal hell forever.
That's why he is mortal in his own mind, that's a kind of NO
Immortality, NO hell forever, NO thank God!
Now a well trained preclear will understand after a few hours of
auditing that he has many SOME items and many NO items. All it takes is
finding one NO item and he's hooked on finding more, the relief is so
great.
So this preclear is now living with SOME SOME items, and SOME NO
ITEMS, and he is happy with that.
But the unaudited woggy doesn't know this, he is living with NO
SOME items, and NO NO items!
He doesn't know that he doesn't know, that's a NO NO item.
No if you think about it, if you really want to forget something,
you ALSO need to forget that you wanted to forget it!
Thus as soon as you create a NO item, you HAVE to create a NO NO
item to make the NO item stick, or else it will just come up to the
surface again the next time you sneeze.
But even the NO NO item won't stick forever, you have to forget
that too, so now you have a NO NO NO item. You see how this goes?
So in fact when a being gets dead serious about never knowing about
something never again, he creates an infinite regression of ... NO NO NO
NO item, which puts the power of the infinite behind that forgetfulness.
This infinite regression is part of what keeps time going, because
NO is another layer of effort committed to covering over the item, and
then covering over the covering over,etc forever.
As your preclear starts to run NO items, he will suddenly start to
contact the infinite regression and his time and space will rock and
start to expand significantly.
This can be dangerous, so watch it.
If your preclear goes wildly unstable, just continue to run NO and
SOME. He can stabilize anything with NO for a while, then SOME for a
while etc.
Remember also that at the craziest part of his core, the part that
really starts him swirling and swimming in dizziness, he is running both
NO *AND* SOME on the same item at the same time.
We used to talk about the poor guy who came to a fork in the
road and couldn't decide whether to go left or right. So eventually
he built a house at the fork, and decided to live there for
rest of his life.
He got stuck in an indecision, and yes building the house
was pure Q&A from getting on with going where he was going.
But he's not insane. He's stuck in an indecision to
go left *OR* go right.
The indecision is not only not insane, it isn't unethical
either, because its not illogical, and ethics is logic.
But his indecision is problematic in that his life stops
at that point and he does something else.
But imagine now that rather than settle for an unending
indecision to left or right, he makes a DECISION to go BOTH
left *AND* right.
Now he is insane, because he can't do that, and its not logical,
and thus it is unethical, and this is beginning of hysteria and all out
loss of control.
So just so is your preclear doing a item *AND* NOT item on various
things, he is also doing a NO *AND* SOME on both the item AND its
opposite.
NO *AND* SOME on love *AND* hate for mother.
This is the beginning of hysteria and insanity, because he can't
open and close the door at the same time, but the way to stabilize it is
to DO IT knowingly. Just get the idea of NO *AND* SOME of the item at
the same time, and it will stabilize and he can let go of it SLOWLY and
under control.
The destabilization comes from letting go of the nut and fruit
factory too fast.
He starts to feel unstable with all this hysteria energy swirling
around him, making his dizzy and nauseous, and he starts to panic and
starts asking questions "What should I do?!!!!" which is NOT what he
should do. He should get the idea of NO AND SOME item at the same time,
and keep doing that, and he will maintain control, and not die on you.
OK, so we didn't know all that back in adore86.memo.
That was hard won knowledge, I am lucky to be sitting here writing
this.
The important part is, that if you don't run the NO, the preclear
will start to fall into the NO anyhow and eventually blow.
(Blow means leave, leave his post, leave his friends, his auditor,
auditing, and eventually the Church).
Say you are running exteriorization, and you run it and you run it,
and the preclear exteriorizes, full perception, lights on bright in the
room even if the lights are off, moves out of his body, over across the
street, and sees all kinds of things, remote reports back and proves
each and every one of them, and then comes back into his body, and you
continue to run ext, ext, ext, ext.
Two weeks later, you are talking to this preclear and you say 'Hey
Goober I heard you exteriorized in session!"
Goober says "Yeah, well, I don't really believe in exteriorization,
there's all kinds of mental phenomenon that you really just can't say
whether its real or not."
And you say "What? What about all those things you saw outside and
could prove?"
And Goober says "Prove? Oh well, right, prove, can we talk about
this later? Thanks..."
See? Goober has had so much SOME exteriorization run that he is
now totally swamped in the missed wittholds of NO exteriorizations,
charge restimulated by auditing SOME, but not pulled by failing to run
NO.
So you grab Goober and put him back into session, and you ask him
"Tell me about NO exteriorization".
The room goes dark, blackness forever runs out and covers the
earth, and 3 hours later all the dark matter in the universe is glowing
bright, and he is so exteriorized you don't know which galaxy he is in,
or which time line.
So this is an important phenomenon. Particularly if you consider
that 'case gain' is an item, and what the consequences of failing to run
NO case gain will be to your clearing production line.
Not to mention what the consequences of failing to run NO
exteriorization on Roland will be to your future reputation in his field.
OK, take a break, donuts and coffee for everyone!
Homer
Sat Oct 9 20:51:05 EDT 2010
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Thu Dec 8 12:06:02 EST 2016
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore806.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFYSZL7URT1lqxE3HERApMuAJ0bzfaQw5M7Wvne1XuTfKZve4YdSwCdHiX8
QHUE2ck/clKizuiMJSvjLts=
=yk+8
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Sun Jan 29 14:57:59 EST 2017
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore806.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFYjklHURT1lqxE3HERAtoJAJ9J8OFhXkB75tQU+4unWojGmMm7CQCgw0OM
QfBK4jj0VT8RxcZAoawAlkE=
=4FFZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)