Tuesday, February 28, 2012

DARE NOT LOOK UPON

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

DARE NOT LOOK UPON

CB Willis (cbwillis@adore.lightlink.com) wrote:

>Without the ability and inclination to make some pictures,
>you have a black V case. True or not? why?

A Black V case is not a pc who can't make any mockups, its
a pc who can't stop making a mockup.

He is so busy NOT seeing mockup A by making mockup B that he
has no energy left to make mockup C.

Run,

"Mockup something you dare not look upon."

Homer

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Tue Feb 28 03:06:02 EST 2012
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore75.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFPTIrqURT1lqxE3HERAo3WAJ0Ru+k+PxSf6k437jv1B65x8r+WAQCfZS+d
lt8VrxJ7nzdlzk+26dKAW08=
=hkpB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Homerwsmith-l mailing list
Homerwsmith-l@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
_______________________________________________
Clear-L mailing list
Clear-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/clear-l

Monday, February 27, 2012

HELP HARM 2 (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

There is,

Wanting help.

Wanting to be helped.

Wanting to help.

Wanting harm.

Wanting to harm.

Wanting to be harmed.

There is,

Helping to harm.

Helping by harming.

Harming to help.

Harming by helping.

The intention can be to Help or Harm.

The method can be to Help or Harm.

The result can be Harm or Help.

Psychosomatics may be caused by wanting to help or wanting to be
helped, but doing so by harming.

The first step to any auditing program therefore is clearing

Wanting and Needing Help and Harm, intentions, methods and results.

Homer

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith News, Web, Telnet Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 SunOS 4.1.4 Sparc 20 Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com info@lightlink.com http://www.lightlink.com

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Mon Feb 27 03:06:02 EST 2012
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/helpharm2.script
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFPSzlqURT1lqxE3HERAtk6AKCHmtgf9hGFaAGCypOWVZl1Ev8pvQCeNy/A
axA6ZEg1w0F59Zg+D7wne6w=
=BZtu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Homerwsmith-l mailing list
Homerwsmith-l@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

DESIRE AND BELIEF

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


DESIRE AND BELIEF

A being is something on the order of a total knowingness.

This doesn't mean that he knows everything, or everything that
everyone else has ever created or ever will.

For example he doesn't necessarily know all the digits of PI.

However he may or may not know all the digits of PI that have
ever been computed or ever will be computed in any universe.

But mostly being a total knowingness means he is quite capable
without futher education of knowing and not knowing things into and
out of existence, and basically everything he does is made of knowing
of one kind or another.

Total knowingness then means there is nothing more than knowing
to a being's abilities.

This leads to a rather odd aberration which is that his need to
believe that he knows everything necessary to know, regardless of how
unpleasant a crock of hell bound bull it is, exceeds his need to
believe something desirable.

He will say 'Thank you Lord for giving me the truth, even though
all my star bellied sneech friends are all going to hell forever, at
least I, without the star belly, am going to heaven, thank you for
that!'

Yet take this same guy and put him into session and run 'How do
you feel about that belief?' and see what happenes.

At first he will lie to you, he can't afford to admit discord
with the word of God, his God is a mean God and will send him to hell
along with all his star bellied sneech friends for doubt of canon,
which is heresy.

This guy is inaccessible, a lie factory, totally out of contact
with his own DESIRE.

You might as well run,

"Well if YOU were the Creator, how would YOU have created
things?"

Oh that's a dangerous one, why bother thinking about our desire,
what possible relevance can desire have to the what is?

Desire is at best a failing where it agrees with the AllThatIs,
and an outright sin where it disagrees.

So this guy is toast, he lives and breaths and teaches a detested
conception of the cosmic all, yet tries very hard to be 'good' lest he
go to hell forever at the hands of a seriously deranged God.

Teaching little kids about hell forever is actually a form of
child abuse, but the psychotic parent does it for the child's own
good, and his own. If he doesn't, the child might end up there and
God will surely take the parent to task for allowing that to happen
through mere lack of educating the child properly.

So we have a very sick society, people are BELOW knowing what
they desire any more and they are TERRIFIED crazy to find out.

Something or someone might take exception to it.

But how can a being get so low toned that he will sell his own
desire down the river just to believe that he has all the answers?

That's because a being can not stand NOT KNOWING.

A being is basically a total knowingness but at the top of the
tone scale, at native state, there is nothing to know, just resident
ability to know and not know.

So not knowing is top scale, and ALL ABERRATION is enforced basic
truth.

So when the being finds himself in a universe where he has no
clue where he came from, and no rememberance at all of choosing his
present condition, and UNABLE TO KNOW, he will do anything, include
sell his self, desire and integrity along with everyone else's too,
right down the river in order to believe that he knows again, even if
his knowing is the most horrible nightmare alive.

Nightmares are basically unproud knowledge.


Thus you have most of the planet believing that people go to hell
forever simply for having a star on their belly, while 'chosen' people
do not.

This view is SO HORRIBLE that it exceeds even the imagination
of the star bellied people that anyone could ever believe it unless
it were somehow true, and so you find some of the star bellies wanting
to convert to the non star belly's nightmare.

God won't send them to hell if they are right, will He?

A little laser surgery will remove the star they hope.

The issue here is DESIRE.

People believe they don't have what they desire, but they have
lost sight that they desired to not have what they desire. And that
loss of sight they desired.

So recovering for a person WHAT HE DESIRES in the way of an
operating AllThatIs, goes a long ways towards clearing a person.

He will go through a phase of coming back into contact with what
he really desires, but still suffer the self casting doubt that he can
have it.

These are the Qualms, otherwise known as 'too good to be true'.

Get him through it, not know is better than selling yourself and
everyone else you touch down the river out of cowardice for the
momentary relief of lies and illusion of knowing it all.

And guess what, he will be able to make friends again, oh will he
be able to make friends again, with EVERYONE.

He will FEEL, he will BOND, he will afford intimacy again.

Even with people who think he is going to hell forever for making
friends with everyone.

Homer

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com

Sun Aug 5 22:04:46 EDT 2007

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Tue Feb 21 03:06:02 EST 2012
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore535.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFPQ1BqURT1lqxE3HERAjWtAJ4v0HHJHmccHK972h0WkNVL9mcChwCfbOZy
IKotVbhIeqjttn+w3XVaeHE=
=6SVC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Homerwsmith-l mailing list
Homerwsmith-l@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
_______________________________________________
Clear-L mailing list
Clear-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/clear-l

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

DREAM LESSONS

DREAM LESSONS

lr2447@techie.com wrote:

>Give it up, Homer.
>Nothing helps.
>Nothing works.
>You will always be subject to these dreams.
>All is lost.

Actually the dreams themselves are blow offs of charge directly
resulting from my own solo auditing.

When the dreaming stops, or they become banal, only then do I start
to worry about not making case gain in the waking state.

The blow off dreams are always lessons.

The bug dreams are lessons in not resisting, the bugs drop off and
go away. Flinch a bit and they bite in harder.

The babe dreams are both reward and also lesson, because getting a
girl or a whole beach of them to drop their shirts by a mere thought is
an art in itself.

The lost and lonely dreams are also a lesson. If I go LOOKING for
babes or people, I never find them, but if I just sit down and expect
them to show up, they materialize out of nowhere. Its the most amazing
thing I know.

Problem is it doesn't seem to work in real life.

First thing is, things and people can't just materialize out of
nowhere in the waking state, they gotta come from SOMEWHERE, and it
takes a lot of energy and effort to move from somewhere to somewhere
else, namely where I am, and it has to coincide with their own
postulates and needs at the time.

The simultaneous equation of having a babe show up right here,
right now where I am, is a lot harder.

Second thing is there are a lot of conflicting postulates on whether
we would want that to happen or not in the waking state.

In dreamtime it doesn't matter that I already have 3 jealous wives,
except with they enter the dream too :)

But beyond that it just doesn't seem to work.

Also like when applied to business, it would seem that just sitting
in a dark room and not doing anything at all will not bring business to
the door. One has to do SOMETHING to make people show up wanting
services etc. This is a major problem for us in present time, competing
against the giants of the communications industry like Time Warner and
Verizon phone.

But one can go bonkers trying to figure out what to DO to bring in
business, and frankly its just like the dreams where the more I look the
less I find, so I gotta wonder if there ain't some kind of zen of not
doing that I could be doing that would bring the contracts in.

But still the dreams remind me that 'command' is more effective
than effort, when I go LOOKING for babes, I find dirt, and oil
pollution, and darkness, and dank evil putridness, but if I sit down in
the middle of all that crud, where no babe would ever go on her own,
they just show up. Its really miraculous.

Adore teaches about the prior postulate to the question, that the
question keeps the prior postulate in effect.

The postulate that I have to go find babes implies the postulate
that there ain't no babes presently here. So the more I look for them,
the more I am postulating I don't have them and so the less I have even
when I look, they are always off receding into the distance.

But it takes unbelievable confront to sit down in the deepest,
dankest darkest part of dream town and just expect babes to show up. I
mean you should at least GO to where babes MIGHT show up, you see? Like
a library, or an eating place, or someplace pretty and safe.

But that solidifies two postulates, 1.) that babes only go
some places, so you gotta go there to meet them, and 2.) you still ain't
got no babes right where you are.

So taking the intention to just sit down where I am, and not do
ANYTHING to find babes, and they will come and find me is one of the
hardest thing to do in the world, yet in the dreams it works every time,
well most every time. sometimes I get a lot of fags showing up,
blecch, but I try to be nice and affectionate, at least they are better
than nothing.

I don't know why the lesson of sitting still rather than
looking for sometimes fails, and I am greatful that most of
the time it works.

So if I could just apply that little lesson to SOMETHING in the
real world, I would be greatly happy.

Dream are also a selection out of a huge collection of nasty
engrams, so if I am swimming in cool clear water, almost heaven to me,
and I so much as get the idea that there might be something nasty
swimming with me, sure enough the pool or water becomes instantly full of
prehistoric monsters with a 1000 teeth per.

Now the BT's form a whole other lesson as I have recorded here many
times.

I presume every being in my dream is a BT or being or composite or
something living from somewhere.

Some are very fragile, if I so much as look at them too hard, their
eyes go wide and they start to melt.

Some are unconfrontably strong, I can't do a thing with them, its
like fighting living stone. Sometimes I can absorb them into me as a
last gesture of non resistance, but that is not a clean solution, they
are still there in side me!

(Last night I ran into a seriously dead and ugly bunch of ghouls,
and one of them looked at me and said 'Let's see how wise you are', and
he walked right into me and half way through, where he got stuck. I
could as-is most of him, but not all of him. This was HIS choice to
walk into my body, usually I pull them in, or walk into them.
Maintaining cause helps as-is the meld afterwards.)

On others, I can do a single round of what are you, who are you,
and they start to come apart. But others will taunt me, I will start
'What are you' and they go 'Yeah yeah, who are you, what are you, who are
you, what are you' and start laughing their heads off.

So I try 'how many are you?' That gets a few of them.

Then 'When are you?' and that gets more.

Then 'Why are you?' and that gets more.

Then "How can I be of service to you?" and that gets more.

The rest I haven't solved yet.

Some need to be indicated how many they might be, up in the 100
trillions, when you get too high, they look at you and shake their
heads, as if to say 'nah no way, I ain't that many!' and you go back
down by 10's, until they nod and start behaving.

Now don't get me wrong I don't usually go trying to unmock the
beings in my dreams, I would rather play with them, but if they turn out
to be difficult or harassing, or invading or antagonistic then they
become fair game.

I have run into beings in my dreams so strong that my only possible
course of action is to become part of THEIR game lest they unmock or
crush me!

Homer

>Howzzat?

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com

CONSCIOUSNESS AND BODY

CONSCIOUSNESS AND BODY

A being can virtualize anything he wants to.

If you cut the corpus collosum in the brain and the left hand
doesn't know what the right hand is doing, you might ask how come that
affects the being?

Well if the being is outside of the body, it won't, but once you
enter the body you ARE the body, by the rules of that game.

Thus if someone knocks you over the head in the virtual reality,
and the body goes 'unconscious', so will you.

This is totally awesome what a conscious unit can mockup for
itself.

It is that awesomeness that helps make the being think it is all
actual. He thinks it all exceeds his capacity for self creation.

That was his intent in creating it.

It is still nothing more than a dream.

There *IS* no out there while awake, any more than there is any out
there while dreaming asleep, no matter how much out there it looks like
is out there. If all that out thereness WERE out there, you COULDN'T
SEE IT, as nothing can see anything that isn't a change in ITSELF. A
thing can only see itself. The fact that you can see out there, means
it isn't out there, its a display of virtual out thereness in a non out
there consciousness.

There may be an out thereness that is actual, which is then
*REPRESENTED* by the out thereness perceived in consciousness, but the
perception of out thereness in consciousness is not proof of, nor even
evidence for, the existence of actual out thereness out there!

Hello, anyone listening?

Homer

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com

Mon Jul 17 20:37:11 EDT 2006

CONSCIOUSNESS AND BODY

CONSCIOUSNESS AND BODY

A being can virtualize anything he wants to.

If you cut the corpus collosum in the brain and the left hand
doesn't know what the right hand is doing, you might ask how come that
affects the being?

Well if the being is outside of the body, it won't, but once you
enter the body you ARE the body, by the rules of that game.

Thus if someone knocks you over the head in the virtual reality,
and the body goes 'unconscious', so will you.

This is totally awesome what a conscious unit can mockup for
itself.

It is that awesomeness that helps make the being think it is all
actual. He thinks it all exceeds his capacity for self creation.

That was his intent in creating it.

It is still nothing more than a dream.

There *IS* no out there while awake, any more than there is any out
there while dreaming asleep, no matter how much out there it looks like
is out there. If all that out thereness WERE out there, you COULDN'T
SEE IT, as nothing can see anything that isn't a change it ITSELF. A
thing can only see itself. The fact that you can see out there, means
it isn't out there, its a display of virtual out thereness in a non out
there consciousness.

There may be an out thereness that is actual, which is then
*REPRESENTED* by the out thereness perceived in consciousness, but the
perception of out thereness in consciousness is not proof of, nor even
evidence for, the existence of actual out thereness out there!

Hello, anyone listening?

Homer

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com

Mon Jul 17 20:37:11 EDT 2006

Friday, February 10, 2012

OCCAM'S RAZOR

OCCAM'S RAZOR

"Occam's Razor is best suited for sophomores to cut their own
throats while thinking in the morning." - Homer

William of Occam was one of the greatest logicians of the Middle
Ages.

He said:

"Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatum."

Translated this means:

"Entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity."

or depending on your text book,

"A plurality should not be asserted without necessity."

Although it is not recorded in the history books, friar William
also said,

"The final theory will never predict more facts than there are."

In other words,

"Given all the facts, the simplest theory is the correct one."

The simplest theory is the theory that predicts all the facts
that there are and no more.

The justification for this is easy, if a theory allows for
something to happen, given an infinite amount of time it probably will
happen. Thus *GIVEN ALL THE FACTS ACROSS ALL SPACE AND TIME AND ALL
POSSIBLE UNIVERSES* one would not expect a theory to allow for
something that actually never ever occurred.

But who has all the facts?

The problem with theory balls is they can appear round and thus
complete merely because various observations have not been made.

The PROBLEM is the theorist who rounds out the latest theory ball
gets his PhD thesis, or some prize for his work and thus has no
motivation to look further.

What generally happens is the world suffers from complacent know
it alls, until someone accidentally discovers something that breaks
the extant theory balls in existence.

Certainly very few are out LOOKING to break them.

Many many more people are working on rounding out the latest
theory ball, than are trying to smash it to pieces and get on with the
next screen.

It is much more comfortable to know that you have the grand
unified theory of everything, than to see your theory ball crushed to
pieces on the ground.

Worse few will pay you to crush the existing theory ball, there
is much more money in being the first to perfect the existing one.

For example the present Holy Grail of physics is to find the
Grand Unified Theory of Everything.

Physics consists of the 4 great forces in nature. Each force is
a 'source of cause'.

These 4 forces are electromagnetism, gravity, the nuclear force
and the weak force.

Physicists hope to find that each of these 4 very different
forces are in fact related to one underlying force, that they are
different manifestations of the same thing, and thus unify the field
of physics into one thing.

Presently Quantum Mechanics explains the very small and sub
atomic.

Weak and nuclear forces explain the atomic nucleus.

Electromagnetism explains the intermediate scale phenomenon, of
light and radio waves.

And special and general relativity explain the very big and very
fast.

Electricity and Magnetism, that at first seemed to be two
different forces were unified early on when magnetism was shown to be
a by product of special relativity and moving past electric fields.
This single force is now called electromagnetism.

Now we have Quantum Electromagnetism, which unifies the various
theories of light and radio waves with the super, sub atomic particles
of physics and the very very early moments of the big bang.

Also in development is Quantum Gravity, which again extends
Einstein's theories of general relativity to the very small and very
early in time.

But they still haven't a clue how to make the nuclear and weak
forces fit into this grand scheme of things.

They hope and they pray on string theory, but it isn't a done
deal yet.

So they have this slightly out of round theory ball that they are
desperately trying to round out.

And once they do, there will be a Nobel Prize, and lots of
admiration and applause and this perfectly round theory ball will be
paraded up and down the halls of fame and academentia.

But what about consciousness?

Oh well, consciousness is just a process in the brain, we all
know that.

No we don't.

You see there aren't just 4 fundamental forces in nature, there
is also will and motivation, conscious agency and certainty, which at
least make for the 5th, as these things CAN'T be made from the other
4!

Learning with Certainty across a distance is impossible.

But by relegating consciousness to 'merely a process in the other
4' they can continue to round out there sadly lacking theory ball.

And when they have rounded it out what will they have?

They will have an explanation for everything in the universe
except for consciousness.

Perfect certainty of existence, change, and agency.

A space time machine can't do that.

What respect can you give a science that defines you out of
existence?

So the materialistic world will coast along for a while all smug
and warm that they now know it all, until one day someone either
accidentally or on purpose discovers that they can exteriorize from a
body and can see the physical universe from multiple viewpoints.

How can that be explained by their round little theory ball?

*IT CAN'T*

That round little theory ball is a dead man walking.

Thus the physicists that are working on the grand unified theory
of everything, who consider that everything is a function of the 4
forces of nature, are working on a theory ball that is ALREADY DEAD.

Now maybe that's what the Nobel Prize is for, to give the dead
their due, but me thinks that Nobel would roll over in his grave if he
knew the state of soullessness of today's sciences.

So what does one do with a perfectly round theory ball?

Well why mess with it? You are paid to have your certificate on
the wall that says you are the world's greatest physicist.

This theory ball you devised explains everything you have
observed, and you have observed everything it predicts.

In all fairness that is quite an accomplishment.

Shouldn't we just get on with life, and go pick some flowers?

So Goober says "but I exteriorized last night", and Prof.
Phudbrain says "That's impossible you are insane, you are a danger to
society, you need prozac!"

Prof. Phudbrain has lots of stock in Merck and Eli Lily.

So that is the pattern of history, they get a complete theory
ball, and society just sits there, and sits there, and sits there,
until it breaks by hook or by crook.

It is just so tempting to believe that there is nothing more to
know, that everything of import is known, that there are no more
mysteries of significance, so no one tries to rock the boat.

So what is the correct thing to do?

Take your theory ball and hit it with a sledge hammer.

Reverse every assumption and explanation and see if you can make
a prediction that NO ONE would believe in. Then go test it.

For example, you have a perfectly round theory ball that says the
world is made of space and time, and consciousness is a process in the
brain.

Thus of course consciousness can not exteriorize or exist between
bodies, let alone for trillions of universes.

As long as consciousness is MADE of dust in the wind, then
consciousness will become dust in the wind.

But now let's just be ridiculous for a moment, we have lots of
time on our hands, no more research to do, you know, as we already know
it all.

Let's assume just for one ridiculous insane crazy, we ain't NEVER
going to tell ANYONE about this, moment that perhaps consciousness is
not a process in the physical universe, but that the physical universe
is a process in consciousness.

Whoa dude, gimme that toke back for a moment will ya?

Maybe consciousness IS that underlying thing that gave rise to
the other 4 forces of nature. Wouldn't that be a hoot.

You know very well that as long as Prof. Phudbrain believes that
consciousness is made of meat, he ain't never going to find his
unification. He's got his unification right there under his nose,
perfect certainty of *AGENCY*, the great *I AM*, and he has already
dismissed it as nothing but a process in existing physical garbage.

But say the toke is good that night, and you start thinking about
this really politically incorrect idea that the physical universe is a
process in consciousness.

Well then if consciousness CREATED the physical universe, then
surely it existed prior to and will exist after the physical universe
is long gone.

That means that the conscious unit had to enter the physical
universe and the body in order to be in the state it finds itself in
now.

All of a sudden an idea hits you like a thunderbolt out of hell,

"THE WAY IN IS THE WAY OUT!"

That means perhaps if you hunt around for the moment of coming
into the body as a conscious unit, you might be able to exteriorize
and get out, or at least remember coming in.

You never thought of that before.

That's because you never had the context in which to conceive it
before. Your prior existing theory ball acted as a black bowling ball
inside your consciousness preventing you from thinking outside the
ball.

Suddenly with your new theory ball, the black bowling ball forms
searing cracks of white light all over its surface and it starts to
fall apart.

Whoa, better go out for a walk dude. And leave the toke behind.

Homer

ADDENDUM

A perfect example of this is how long people had to wait for
special relativity to come along after understanding what light was and
that it had a finite speed.

At the time they were working with Newtonian mechanics, and
velocities added properly were not limited to c.

So somewhere in the 1800's everyone started to feel very smug,
about knowing it all. One idiot, er I mean scientist went so far as to
say that almost everything was known now, and pretty soon physics would
have it all wrapped up, their pretty round theory ball that is.

At that point someone really bright could have simply said, ok what
happens if we ASSUME that the speed of light is not only finite but also
constant.

Well that would immediately have led to the postulates of special
relativity and would have been pretty easy to test, breaking apart
EVERYTHING they knew to that time.

But no, everyone was happy with knowing it all, why rock the boat
let along create a earthquake in knowledge.

So the whole world had to wait until Michaelson and Morely did
their theory ball shattering experiments that indicated that there was
something very wrong with their ideas about the normalcy of the speed
of light. It wasn't normal at all.

THEN they spent months if not years fighting over how to explain
this.

FINALLY Einstein comes up with the lasting interpretation called
special relativity as describe by the Minkowski space time diagram.

Now you my claim this is unfair, no one could have possibly thought
the idea that light was weird before the experiments that showed it was,
it was just unthinkable that the world wasn't just as simply plain and
easy as it looked like.

Besides Occam's razor said that the simplest theory was the true
one right?

Wrong. The true theory is the simplest one that explains ALL THE
FACTS, not all the facts that the idiots, er I mean scientists know or
have the balls to see at the time.

Sorry to be so rough on them, between religion and science it is
sometimes hard to tell which has been the most suppressive to truth and
new discovery over the ages.

Both religion and science march to the tune of money, glory and
greed for power and acclaim.

So right now ahead of time we have a theory that says that
consciousness is a process in matter.

Just to piss off teacher, why don't you go and toke up, and just
consider the idea that matter is a process in consciousness.

If you discover immortality and it scares the hell out of you, just
continue your research until you find eternality and the warm fire of
home.

BREAK THE THEORY BALL NOW BEFORE the evidence comes in that it is
not only incomplete but 100 percent ass backwards.

You might then even predict that you should be able to
exteriorize and then find out how, long before anyone actually does.

Then you can go to the NSA and show them what a REAL weapon of war
is.

All because you weren't smug about being right when you couldn't
have been more wrong like all the other losers is academentia.

Homer

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com

Tue Feb 27 01:34:00 EST 2007

Friday, February 3, 2012

SURPRISE

SURPRISE

Brilliant post by G York.

Adore calls the 'surprise' the moment of violation of Sovereign
Desire. Sovereign is defined as "you want it, you got it."

Sovereignty wants to engage in non sovereignty for a while, Adore
calls this majesty, Master of Jest, the impulse towards amusement
through ludicrous demise. Ludicrous comes from 'game'.

"Majesty is the Sovereign Desire that Desire not be Sovereign *FOR
A WHILE*."

Presumably the thetan can not be surprised except by choice, and at
higher levels, even though things happen that are unexpected, the thetan
retains the feeling that things are as they were setup to be, he is
engaged in getting slaughtered by *HIS OWN* arcade game, and those he
*INVITED*, so sovereignty remains in, even though he has no idea what is
going to happen next, and he is losing as fast as he can play.

As long as the sovereignty and the invite remain in on the playing
field, the game and the various teams, he can continue to play and enjoy
it no matter what happens.

However the thetan can also engage in more serious levels of
surprise, where sovereignty is violated absolutely and utterly.

The consideration that this is so is probably an unprovoked overt
act against himself, the very idea that sovereignty might have been
violated for real will make the thetan feel so dark he will scare the
hell out of himself and become even more sure that it has.

"Doubt is self casting."

This is Adore's Doubt Effect and is engaged upon with full knowing
responsibility and full awareness of the consequences.

So its an engagement.

Adore says that one of the items in the violation is incredibility.

Incredibility is defined as

Certainty something exists.
Certainty something is impossible.

This results in shock and timelessness, because the thetan running
into an impossibility, *CAN NOT* just go on. He tries to end game for a
moment to regain his bearings, Like Captain Picard in Star Trek, he says
'Computer, end program' on the holodeck of life as it were.

The moment of stopped forward motion, puts the thetan into a
timelessness where he is again in contact with his fountainhead of
source, the power emanating from there is infinite, but rather than a
flow coming through the thetan being casted out to the world as an
exercise of his sovereignty, "Source sources when Will Casts", the
thetan is more turned around looking back down the channel of power
wondering who or what created *THAT*, whatever it was that surprised him
so.

Adore defines religious insanity as "Who or what is cause around
here and why is it such an asshole!"

This stopped moment of time with the thetan looking the 'wrong way
to', back down at source, is the moment of shock,

It is a moment of considered separation from source and the outward
flow of power, the thetan is looking inward toward the power, and the
power, is flowing out through him in spite of himself,

*SOMETHING ELSE IS CASTING*.

The thetan ends up resisting the outward casting of what is going
on, and a strong commitment to "*I* didn't create that, *NO ONE* created
that, what the *HELL* is going on here?"

It gets the thetan into Duality, like there is him and there is
something else, not other thetans that are like him, they wouldn't
create the thing that happened either, this is something *ELSE*.

He may mockup a terminal identity to give this *ELSE* a name, Adore
calls it Nemesis One.

Nemesis One is not just an enemy out on the playing field, the
thetan can end program on that any time he wants. This is more alien,
something that *CAN'T* exist but does. You see that never gets
resolved. The thetan takes a loss on it, shrugs his shoulders and goes
on with the game accepting that something which can not exist none the
less does. The impossibility is never resolved, and the thetan suspends
his reason and logic at that point because they are no longer of use to
him.

Thus LRH says "Don't forget the incredible chains."

The thetan has affinity for anyone that is a thetan because
inherently he considers that he can duplicate anything that is *LIKE
HIM* no matter how out in left field it becomes.

He considers this violation though did not come from something
*LIKE HIM*, and he can't figure out what else it could be or why it did
it, so he postulates a total duplication failure.

He probably in truth can not understand anything that is not like
himself and source, because in truth there isn't anything else but
himself and source and those like him, and the moment he postulates
there is, he is doomed to not being able to understand or duplicate it.

You know I am not saying that all thetans are the same, but they
all do have a common ground of operation, no matter how different their
personal manifestations are. If one looks closely at one self and
other's, one will always find the common ground that is identical to
all. This is the basis of affinity.

Since he considers he didn't postulate it, and that all his buddies
out on the playing field couldn't have either, he considers that he
can't duplicate what would have created it, because nothing in its right
mind would have, so he knows he can't get rid of it, because he can't
as-is it and is not sure he wants to, lest he become like it.

An as-isness is a becoming what is being as-ised, mocking one's
self up as, and in the inability or unwillingness to be something,
he can never get rid of it.

Eventually he becomes it anyhow by virtue of "you become what you
fear if you lose to it."

This first moment of the fall from Sovereignty is an important
moment to contact and run out. It will turn the thetan around again to
where Source is not something other than him, trying to do him in with
impossibilities, and he can regain his ability to maintain his position
in space as caster of outward manifestation along with his other casting
thetan buddies.

The *otherness* to life will have vanished.

But watch it, his tendency towards Operating Majesty will be
rehabilitated again.

Homer


gfyork (gfyork@ix.netcom.com) wrote:


>Homer Wilson Smith wrote:

>>
>> >But at basic, overts are always comitted to solve something,
>> >so the prior confusion tech undercuts and works even if
>> >you are in the middle of a GPM.
>>
>> Please everyone, define confusion as you understand it.
>>
>> Homer

>I'll take a stab at that.

>A confusion is a failure to predict, a protest, a mass, and a postulate
>that resolves the failure.

>The "leading edge" of confusion is a shock: the moment you realize
>prediction has failed. Something happened that was not allowed for in
>your estimation of the possible futures. This can be as minor as when a
>person suddenly asks you a totally off the wall question -- one that you
>can answer, perhaps -- but the asking of it at that time was so
>completely unanticipated that you are momentarily shocked and must take
>a moment to realign your reality to include it. Or it can be as major
>as sudden death.

>Following the shock is a period containing a bundle (or mass) of
>misemotion. This mass may include fear (of bodily injury, inability to
>cope, whatever), self-doubt, anger (at self or others), protest,
>helplessness, etc. It also strongly contains NEED OF CHANGE. I'd guess
>that the main thing charging up the mass is huge protest.

>It may be that need of change proceeds from avoidance of the unpleasant
>emotions; it may be that we just have a very strong need to feel we can
>correctly anticipate the future. We need to get our predictor working
>again.

>From Idenics, comes the idea that this is the area where new identities
>are often created -- to resolve a major confusion. Basically we have to
>QUICKLY figure out what to do to get things back on track.

>We've got a failed prediction situation -- we KNOW we've either got bad
>data or have misevaluated our data. Hence, we're real vulnerable.
>ANYTHING could happen. We know it's imperative to get our data
>reevaluated, realigned and to do so rapidly.

>Ron said that it's possible to handle a confusion by picking one "stable
>datum" and aligning everything around it.

>When we're sitting in a confusion, we often do something similar to this
>which is not quite correct: we kind of ask ourselves, "what hypothesis
>could explain the observed data?" We answer that question (in a hurry)
>then, because we're in a hurry, and all the data fits the hypothesis of
>course, we assume the hypothesis to be true.

>"I was SURE I would make my sales quota this week! What went wrong?"
>Hypothesis: "I'm just not good with people."
>That would explain it. That's it! ( I feel better already.)
>Solution to better prediction? Easy:
> Find a job where I don't have to work with people so much. (Whew!)
>Now I know life will be better. I've resolved the confusion, figured
>out my failure to predict, and have a plan to set things right. Life
>should be more predictable from now on. And, of course, it might --
>particularly if I hadn't just latched on to the first explanation that
>aligned all the data.

>[ When these "hypotheses" are acceptable to others, and are general
>enough to "explain" other failures, they can become habitual and move
>into the Service Fac. category.]

>Because we're often making these decisions hastily and while sitting in
>the middle of a bunch of charge, with stable data blown, the decisions
>are often way screwed up.

>This accounts for the postulate found in engrams because nearly all
>engrams come about because of a failure to predict, contain the shock of
>that failure and the urgency to figure it out and get things back on
>track.

>So, the leading edge of a confusion is shock, in the middle is protest,
>a bunch of misemotion and hasty realignment of data, at the trailing
>edge is the postulate: the decision to do, be or have that we figure
>will get things back on track.

>-----

>Speculation:

>What is prediction? What if it is not so much the attempt to foresee
>the future as the attempt to create the future? Should this be so, then
>the shock becomes the moment we realize that somebody just stomped all
>over a bunch of our postulates. Or it could be the ARC break with
>others when we discover that the agreement we THOUGHT we had has been
>broken.

>Hmm. If we are continuously cocreating a consensus reality with our
>fellow gods, how could we really fail to predict reality? Seems we
>would already have to have gone out of communication to some degree with
>our fellows. Maybe trying to not know the consensus and enforce our own
>vision?

>We like Games, Opponents, and Surprise. To have surprise and opponents,
>we have to not know what our opponents will do. But, to have a
>consensus reality, we have to know every bit of what our opponents will
>do in order to see that it all gets mocked up properly.

>If the PU is about having games, opponents, and surprise, and if there
>is no, "Big Thetan," keeping it all mocked up for us, then a requirement
>for participation must be the ability to divide our knowingness so that
>we can, simultaneously, both know and not know.

>It would seem that we cannot get past compulsive not know unless we are
>willing to give up surprise and opponents. Maybe LRH was on to
>something with that pandeterminism stuff. :)
>--
>Gary F. York
>5422 So. Franklin Ave.
>Springfield, Mo. 65810
>(417) 823-7251
>gfyork@ix.netcom.com

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The paths of lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 cross in Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com the line of duty. http://www.lightlink.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The paths of lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 cross in Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com the line of duty. http://www.lightlink.com


--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The paths of lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 cross in Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com the line of duty. http://www.lightlink.com

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

POWERS AND PROOF

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


POWERS AND PROOF

OK, here is the truth.

Demonstration of OT abilities will never convince anyone that they are
an eternal being, or that they can have those powers themselves. Thus
doing so is very dangerous. If they survive the shock of opening their
pandora's box of immortal nightmares, you will at best have won a follower
who needs your powers for his protection, and at worst won a detractor who
is scared of your powers and will do anything to destroy them, you and
your loved ones.

Further even recovering a memory of one's past track will never
convince a being he is an eternal being, but only an immortal being in
time, destined for hell forever. He will CHOOSE to doubt and go back to
being mortal to protect himself from the vertigo of immortal doom.

The only effective case gain then is to put the being back in
direct contact with his eternal timeless, spaceless, causeless static
self.

THEN he will be able to take full responsibility for the illusions
of immortality and hell forever, and mortality and death forever.

Sorry that's the only way.

Demonstrations of OT power for the mere sake of demonstration to those
who want proof of their eternality is strictly verboten.

It's the worst thing you could do for their case.

Homer

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Thu Apr 17 01:36:00 EDT 2008

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Wed Feb 1 03:06:01 EST 2012
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore578.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFPKPJqURT1lqxE3HERAvH1AKC3OGMppHJDozSa7AT159vT7+RUDQCePKSG
S9TjsVNXqGqhUwhv4uecb7U=
=W3VS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Homerwsmith-l mailing list
Homerwsmith-l@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
_______________________________________________
Clear-L mailing list
Clear-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/clear-l