COPYRIG2 (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


NAPSTER

Yeah it's a bit rough, but this was written back in the time they were
planning to put a cop in every computer and make all OS's secret and
proprietary, and render every communication trackable and moderatable.

Given those days I understand this things tone.

Napster was the greatest thing to hit Earth since fire, not because it
made music free, that was never the point, but because it put music THERE,
all of it, on a world wide distributed basis.

Homer

> Are you advocating the abolishment of all copyrights? I really would not
> like to see the big corp's control all communication, but I'd hate to see
> the baby go out with the dishsoap. I suspect you've done some deep
> thinking on this, and I'd appreciate any comment.

The world moves. The ice age comes in, and the dinosaurs get wiped
out. Sometimes somethings don't survive the changes. They complain
bitterly but the world does not care.

The world is moving towards instantaneous communication between all
beings on all subjects, a totally open group consciousness with no
withholds. It is approximated with the internet, but continues with
telepathy and other new age abilities.

Would copyright holders ban telepathy if people could exchange
their music for free by mental communication alone?

Yes. There is nothing lower on this planet than a copyright
holder. They don't give a damn what happens to everyone else, all they
care about is themselves.

The point is that people do not have inherent rights to survive
just because they exist. If they survive, they survive, if not, then
too bad. People survive by negotiating duties and rights with other
people. To protect themselves against criminality, they pass laws and
give power to police forces to protect their desires (not rights!) for a
fair trade with those that wish to fair trade with them. The laws so
created delineate the fair chosen duties and rights of the agreeing
parties.

At some point the power given to the police force becomes too much
and the criminals and slave masters take over the police force, then you
get a slave society. Criminals *ALWAYS* go where the most concentration
of power is.

The point where the police and government have more power than the
people needs to be watched very carefully. We do not want to create a
police state *FOR ANY REASON* no matter how many poor dear stupid
artists starve to death in their own stupidity. Maybe if they got a
haircut and a real job, their art would improve too.

Now the internet throws the balance completely the other way from a
police state, it allows people to communicate and publish freely on a
scale never before possible and with total safety. The world has needed
this breath of fresh air for a very long time. It is the difference
between a communication prison and wide and unbounded ways.

The lies and one way pablum pushed by the government, and the big
companies can no longer take place with out the truth also being told
because the little guy can speak with immunity and have the whole planet
know the truth the same day.

Well if he can speak politically with immunity, he sure as hell can
trade mp3's with impunity. Its a small price to pay for political
freedom.

You know that the only way to stop bad guys from speaking is to
stop *EVERYONE* from speaking too.

The ONLY way to stop the mp3's is to stop the freedom to speak
anonymously and freely. Lot's of people will throw a fit about allowing
Earthkind to speak freely, but basically you gotta decide between
political freedom, the freedom to think, speak, philsophize and practice
religion freely, and the freedom to protect your information goods in
market, because they are totally opposed to each other.

Some people think little children shouldn't know the truth, and
some people think that Earthkind must not have the ability to
communicate freely with anyone on any subject.

Remember the artist may lose some money, but some of that money he
doesn't need any more because he can get other's art for free too now,
assuming there are no copyrights at all. The only losers in that
exchange are the tax people. Think about it.

Another hefty portion of the money the big artists will lose won't
be available to engage in excess of drugs, wine, women and self
destruction, this might actually improve the qaulity of the art, that
they put out. Do the beatles need millions while the poor starve, and
schools suck etc? How much of your buck for every CD rom goes to
support the drug trade in cocaine and heroin to keep the artist high?

One is not advocating a socialism or communism here, one is in fact
advocating a free market where those that survive do, and those that
don't don't. In such a free market, people are free to negotiate
whatever slave state they wish to protect their selfish interests. I am
merely reminding most decent people that THEY believe that *NOTHING* is
worth a slave state, but that some artists and publishers are too
stupid, selfish or evil to care.

It is quite possible that some technological solution will arise
that will allow those that wish to control the trade of their
information to do so, while NOT in any way dimishing the anonymous free
speech of the internet. That would solve the issue for the copyright
holders and keep the police state at less than critical mass.

*NOTHING* is more important than keeping the police state at less
than critical mass where it takes over and is taken over by criminals.

But I am also reminding one and all that copyrights were created by
*PUBLISHERS* to indenture the artists to the publisher for the benefit
of the publisher and the King of England, not the artist. The artist
was sold on the idea by protecting his rights and income. It was an
extortion racket written into our constitution.

It's the INCOME OF THE PUBLISHER THAT IS PROTECTED. What the
publisher fears most is not that others might get the artists work for
free, but that some artist might publish on his own without the
publisher consent or cut.

The artist's *LIFE AFFLUENCE* would have been many times bigger had
they evolved around information exchange rather than information
ownership. That may sound nuts, but time will tell.

We either have a police state where ALL communication is moderated
and traceable, or we have the end of copyrights. Will the artists
starve? No, but the publishers sure will, and not fast enough.

Maybe we will find a solution that will allow free anonymous speech
to exist side by side with controlled distribution of information. That
would be a good thing. But anyone can make a recording made off his
speakers, zip it up into an mp3 and send it to a friend or start Napster
2.

Unless of course the technology is withdrawn from society and Earth
to do such things.

Do you have any idea how much technology is being suppressed by the
copyright holders and their publisher legions? That's like forbidding
people to know about and own fire because more than one might read the
same book by the fire light. It is unconscionable.

Earth will die and come to a total standstill under the selfish
decisions of copyright holders and their puppet masters. They would
destroy EVERYTHING to protect their 'rights'. A dying animal doesn't
care about anyone else, it cares about only one thing, itself. In its
despair and rage it will take desperate action even if that action wipes
out everything else on Earth.

The dying animal's last effort to win is by doing crazy random
destructive things, sometimes it works, mostly it doesn't. That is what
desperation is, the actions no longer make sense towards survival but
are being tried anyhow.

The internet is the death of publishers because EVERYONE is now a
publisher by default. How can you compete with everyone? They will do
ANYTHING to survive including enslave everyone to non publisher status
again. Artists, well the smart ones will survive, the stupid ones will
hold onto their fear and fade away as their own fans will boycott them
into oblivion where they belong.

The art of selfish people just isn't that good anyhow.

Homer

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Thu Nov 30 12:00:02 EST 2017
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/copyrig2.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFaIDkTURT1lqxE3HERAgPhAJ9CvdrNbpyX9Mkup3mqs516l4pLgACfeFDr
rdTvbBfCcjTxgtxjKPuorGU=
=mi86
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Thu Nov 30 14:32:13 EST 2017
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/copyrig2.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFaIFy9URT1lqxE3HERAlt1AJ4rnIExm5XMcmML3oDPjolqUVz2BwCgog8D
FHznwwqPykOX8sZCdcWpgbo=
=HZ9D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l

HOM37 (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


WOMEN AND MASTER OF DEFENSE.

God
Man - Woman
Child

Women working on their Master of Defense can not conceive of Master of
Offense.

To the woman, Men and Women are the same or ought to be.

When women have male children, they teach this to them, and so their
sons never rise above the level of women. This angers the sons so much,
they get their revenge by holding women down.

Thus it could be said that men are at the level women ought to be, and
woman are at the level they have been pushed down to by their own sons.

If women taught the truth to their sons, their sons would not hate
women, and woman could rise to the level that man is at now, and men could
rise to the level that women can not conceive and men can barely dream.

"The man is *AS FAR ABOVE THE WOMAN as the woman is above the child."

It's not so, only because women will not let it be so.

The man can only rise above the woman to his natural state if the
woman operates him AS A MAN not as a woman.

Women who operate men as women rather than as men, render men into
women, and women into something less.

Homer

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The paths of lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 cross in Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com the line of duty. http://www.lightlink.com

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Wed Nov 29 12:00:03 EST 2017
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/hom37.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFaHueTURT1lqxE3HERAv9EAJ4xJm2fxVxEOKSiORZteiKWS+7SlgCg1Ck4
4yr/KUdu/U4dwslVbHnrCDE=
=xfae
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l

ROLAND0 (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

ROLAND'S EXTERIORIZATION

((Editor's comments in double parentheses. - Homer))

From: Roland <roland.rashleigh-berry@virgin.net>
To: CLEAR-L@lightlink.com
Subject: Account of Exteriorisation with Full Perception
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 08:09:32 +0100

This is a repost of my account of exteriorisation with full
perception.

By Roland Rashleigh-Berry.

This is the story about my experience in Scientology known as
"Exteriorisation with Full Perception". What this means is leaving your
body and having normal perception such as sight and sound available to
you.

This happens when you are fully awake being "audited" usually and
happens in the same room as your body in nearly all cases. Essentially
you ~see~ your body from the outside. This experience is fairly common
for people receiving Scientology processing.

From talking to people about 40% of people experience it at some
time and usually early on in their auditing. It happens most frequently
with "objective" processing which is to do with orientating a person in
the "objective" universe. (You go around touching walls and holding
them still and finding parts of your body etc.).

((Subjective processing addresses their inner mental and emotional
world. Most often new preclears can not access their inner world
without objective processing done first, and in the process they usually
exteriorize at least once which then is a sign that they are ready to
move on to subjective auditing.))

In my case it happened during auditing with an E-meter during the
process called "ARC Straightwire" ((which is a subjective process.))

((ARC straightwire tries to run a 'straight wire' directly from the
preclear to those pleasure moments in his bank that consist of high
affinity, reality and communication.

"Spot a moment of affinity.

Spot a moment of reality (high realness or co agreement with
someone else).

Spot a moment when you were in good communication with someone."

The process is run round robin repeating the cycle over and over
again until some significant end phenomenon occurs which includes new
cognitions about the source of his condition, very good indicators
(preclear smiling and happy and looking outword or extroverted) and a
Floating Needle on the e-meter.

The final end phenomenon of ARC Straight as a group of processes
is: Knows he or she won't get worse.

This probably arises from the new awareness that one is in control
of one's own affinity, reality and communication with and for things,
and that at some time in the past one withdrew these things and never
put them back. Spotting times one had ARC for things leads to the
moment when ARC became 'rendered asunder' and was never restored, so of
course the person started to get worse in life there after.

By denying responsibility for the incident and for withdrawing his
own ARC from the world and people, the being loses the ability to
control his own feelings and mood and his mood then becomes dependent
upon others. One can see where that might lead long term.

People who can't love freely any more are in this class.))

If anyone comes across this they are free to copy and web the page
as well as connect my name with the page. This conflicts with my
business interests (I have pages on the Internet devoted to a shareware
product of mine) however what I will write here is the truth and that
truth ought to be broadly known to people. I will present my story next
and at the end will include some analysis of the experience.

I was being audited in one of the auditing rooms at St. Hill
Castle in southern England about June 1994. The process was "ARC
Straightwire". It was the evening about 8 p.m. I was becoming rather
bored with the auditing which did not seem to be getting me anywhere.
It seemed to be an almost endless series of questions, an experience to
endure rather than to benefit from. I looked through the window. The
sky was darkening with clouds. It looked as though there would be a
thunder storm shortly. I returned my attention to the auditor who
seemed to be more disinterested in my auditing than I was. The auditing
command was "Recall Prevented Sex". I had exhausted all the examples
some time ago and so was just repeating them.

The auditor continued with the command though even though I could
think of nothing. This means that he was getting a persistent read on
the E-meter. This can mean that there was something I was refusing to
reveal that bothered me about this. Alternatively it could mean that
there was something underlying this topic that was inaccessible to my
conscious mind.

((Third possibilily is the question was clean and overrun, reading
thus on a 'withhold of nothing.'))

Anyway, the same question was repeated with my repeating the same
examples. I was bored. It was then that my previous thoughts regarding
a thunder-storm seemed to be fulfilled in a most spectacular way. The
single ceiling light in the auditing room flared up to an incredible
brilliance. I would say it seemed to be about ten times brighter than
normal.

I was very surprised the bulb did not blow. I thought a lightning
bolt must have struck the local power station. I turned to the auditor
and said "Did you see that?". I got no reaction but then auditors are
trained not to react to things like that. I was surprised though that
he did not at least acknowledge my comment.

It seemed as though he had not seen it which to me seemed
impossible. The light had reduced in intensity but was to me at least
four times as bright as normal. I was still very concerned about it. I
asked him "What's wrong with the electricity in here?". Again I got
absolutely no response. An instant later I experienced what I thought
was a landslide.

The whole room slipped forward by about two feet leaving me behind.
It was a bit like the feeling you have when you are in a fast lift
(elevator) going downwards though extremely more so. The room had
slipped forwards leaving me behind. I was absolutely shocked.

I could see the room from outside my body. I was about the height
of the top of my head but about two to three feet behind and slightly to
the left of my left shoulder. I wanted to be where my body was. I did
not understand what was going on.

I was about to ask the auditor to help me but realised I had no
mouth with which to speak. No sound came out. I then thought that I
could probably still use the mouth of my body. I found I could. I said
to him "I can still use my body's mouth. I've slipped two feet
forwards. Could you push me back two feet back in my direction?" (I
know this is self-contradictory). The auditor had at last worked out
what was happening. He said "In the last auditing command, did you
exteriorise?".

Then, and only then, could I make any sense of what had happened to
me. I was exterior! I started taking a more leisurely look round. The
light now seemed duller han usual rather than brighter. I could see
fairly clearly and the 3-D seemed more pronounced than normal (I have a
defective left eye which effectively destroys my 3-D vision with normal
sight).

I looked at the back of my head. It did not seem like it was me
any more. I was going to ask the auditor "who's that other person in
the room?" but then I remembered it was my own body. I remember
thinking to myself "How am I seeing? If I have no physical eyes then I
have no lenses to focus the light. Am I actually projecting the world
from my own mind?". I then started feeling sorry for myself and for
other people. I was thinking "Is this what we are? Invisible spirits
too weak to act on their own and now we are trapped in bodies to suffer
the experiences of pain and death".

I looked at the back of my head again. I wondered if my body were
a living thing that was once a spirit. I felt sympathy for my body. At
that instant I shot towards the head of the body, not of my own
volition, and into it like a bullet.

((Hubbard wrote in an obscure bulletin that chronic interiorization
into a body results from the following sequence (my words):

0.) Harming bodies accidentally, then intentionally.
1.) Trying to manage and control them more and more by moving closer
and closer to them.
2.) Refusal to take responsibility for bodies.
3.) No Sympathy for bodies.
4. Sympathy for bodies.
5.) Propitiation for the body.
6.) BEING the body.))

I was back in my body. I was feeling exhausted. The auditor, who
I had been ignoring for the last half minute, ended the session without
further ado as is standard procedure when an exteriorisation occurs.

Though I was tired I began feeling elated. I thought "That was it,
exteriorisation with full perception. It's happened to me". When I got
up to leave the auditing room I discovered that my balance had been
severely effected. I could hardly manage to walk. Going down the
corridor I was repeatedly bumping into the walls. I had to put my hands
out to steady myself.

The auditor takes you to another room where another person checks
you out on n E-meter. It is called "exams". In the outside room I sort
of overshot and went crashing in to a table. I sort of fell into the
exam room and caused a small surprise. I was happy.

When I went back to the place I was staying at, my balance was
still affected. I walked there which was in retrospect rather stupid
since the road outside was an unlit narrow country road and I could not
walk in a straight line. However I wanted time to absorb what had
happened to me.

Walking back I felt I was surrounded by invisible humming machines.
I was tired but I had the feeling I would not sleep well. When I got
back it was as I expected. I could not sleep well and must have got
only two hours sleep all night. My thinking was confused. Next morning
my balance had thankfully returned to normal.

That is the end of my story. I will keep a copy and update it if I
remember any more. I think I have it all down though. My memory is
very good. Now follows some thoughts on this experience.

Exteriorisation happens to about 40% of people who receive
Scientology auditing and it tends to happen early on in auditing. It is
little wonder that thereafter the person becomes a supporter of
Scientology.

"If this is what happens early on then think of what there is to
come" is a common thought.

The problem is that the experience is non-repeatable (well
certainly I cannot do it and I know of nobody who can do this at will).
As for better things to come this is unfortunately just wishful
thinking.

It is perfectly obvious to me that L. Ron Hubbard went off the
rails in the early '60s. He created a group of followers around him who
believed every word he uttered must be true.

He also created an absurd system called "ethics" (which was nothing
of the sort) that accused those of not getting good results from
auditing as having crimes against him and Scientology. In so doing he
robbed himself of all negative feedback from his research and he became
the victim of his own fantasies.

His later "research" led him to believe in such nonsense as Lord
Xenu who 75 million years ago turned the populations of planets into
"body thetans" which now infest our bodies and need to be telepathically
audited out. The "upper levels" of Scientology are largely concerned
with this.

To my thinking we should return to this phenomenon of
"exteriorisation" and forget the rest of Hubbard's material. It is a
field that requires a great deal of further research. Even if this
experience is not repeatable then at least it should be further
understood.

I am no longer a member of the Church of Scientology. I am now
opposed to its very existence. Their "Bridge to Total Freedom" which
they sell for hundreds of thousands of dollars is the Bridge to nowhere
but financial ruin.

That Hubbard went mad in the 60s and degenerated further, both in
his research and his relationships with other people, during his
remaining years is obvious to those who care to read into the subject
(see the book "Bare-Faced Messiah" on the Internet).

However, at an early stage, I believe his intentions were good.
The phenomenon of exteriorisation is to me the most significant
spiritual and scientific achievement of the last thousand years. I
believe that this phenomenon, if researched enough, will be the
jumping-off point for the spiritual evolution of mankind in the next
millennium.

Roland Rashleigh-Berry,
26th December 1996.

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
- --960500912-347368880-1217993782=:8219--
Tue Aug 5 23:36:22 EDT 2008

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sun Nov 26 12:00:03 EST 2017
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/roland0.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFaGvMTURT1lqxE3HERAgYkAKDCiP/NS4nXjWxO4Zl2tezficPMjwCePXeZ
2NN7yW4ow/4P6NP9GeZaj1c=
=QqWx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l

Deep State Vs Scientology (fwd)

Not my posting...

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 16:11:53 +0000
From: Scientolipedia <dl88008@gmail.com>
To: Homer Smith <HomerWSmith@lightlink.com>
Subject: Deep State Vs Scientology

Part One & Two of Three Part Investigation





























 

SCIENTOLiPEDIA.org

The 'Flagship' for Scientology Outside the Church (#ScientologyOTC)

 DEEP STATE VS SCIENTOLOGY
 

"WHENEVER PHENOMENA BECOME KNOWN TO A SMALL NUMBER OF UNSCRUPULOUS
MEN, THESE, BY SECRECY, CAN EMPLOY IT TO THE ENSLAVEMENT OF MANY.
THIS, IN A THIMBLE, IS THE HISTORY OF THE RACE. IT WAS INEVITABLE
THAT ONCE NATURAL LAW CONCERNING THOUGHT BECAME KNOWN, IT WOULD BE
UTILIZED BY INDIVIDUALS TO ENSLAVE, REDUCE, OR EVEN TO MURDER
OTHERS. INVALIDATION OF DIANETICS IS NOW, FORTUNATELY, RENDERED
IMPOSSIBLE BY THE VIGOROUS PROGRAM OF PROOF AND TESTING TO WHICH IT
HAS BEEN SUBJECTED. HOWEVER, AN INVALIDATION OF DIANETICS AS A
PROCESS BY WHICH ABERRATION CAN BE RELIEVED, WORKS IN THE DIRECTION
OF PERMITTING BLACK DIANETICS TO BE EMPLOYED WITHOUT CENSURE UPON
LUCKLESS HUMAN BEINGS WHO MAY NOT EVEN KNOW THAT IT HAS BEEN SO
EMPLOYED. THE PROCESSES OF BLACK DIANETICS CAN BE REMEDIED BY WHAT
MIGHT BE CALLED WHITE DIANETICS, IN MOST CASES. IF ANY GROUP DESIRED
TO USE THE PHENOMENA DISCOVERED IN DIANETICS TO ENSLAVE AN
INDIVIDUAL, A GROUP, OR A NATION, ITS FIRST STEP WOULD BE TO PLACE
WHITE DIANETICS OUT OF BOUNDS, TO ILLEGALIZE ITS PRACTICE, AND TO
CONDEMN THE TENETS CONTAINED IN IT. TO DEBAR THE GENERAL PUBLIC
PRACTICE OF WHITE DIANETICS IS TO MAKE POSSIBLE A GENERAL UNPUBLIC
PRACTICE OF BLACK DIANETICS."
1952 JOURNAL OF SCIENTOLOGY - "DANGER - BLACK DIANETICS":
HTTP://SCIENTOLIPEDIA.ORG/INFO/DANGER_-_BLACK_DIANETICS


We've released Part One and Two of our three-part investigation into what is
referred to these days as the 'deep state' and its connections to
Scientology.

The Remote Viewing experiments of the early 1970's are integral to
understanding what happened at that time...as well as the "aftermath" of
that project.

As will be revealed in the podcast series, the "deep state" efforts to
hijack and subvert the true nature of the Remote Viewing experiments and
what they proved about L Ron Hubbard's work, are easily stripped away by
those of us who are the beneficiaries of Hubbard's works...outside the
clutches of that "deep state" attempt to suppress it and keep it for
themselves.

Some people may also find the information sheds light on why, who and how
the corporate church became the schizophrenic, psycho organization it is
today.


[5d1122f6-ca5d-456c-8750-cae361fcd111.png]
(click image to watch/listen to this podcast)

 
Become a Patron - Support This Work - Receive Early Copies
[aa846e52-ba09-440c-b093-220f058949c8.png]



Free streaming all LRH lectures:Here
Facebook:
Scientolipedia
Mary Sue Hubbard
Yvonne Gillham Jentzsch
Facebook Group (over 500 members)...
Twitter Feed
YouTube Channel
Newsletter...
 
 
 
 Social Personalities: Liking our Facebook PAGE helps more people find
positive information about Scientology
[0b4af65e-9fd3-49ef-8cb3-cc65eb74e23f.png] and if you really want to stay
up-to-date with what's going on in the field, we also have the largest
(positive) Facebook GROUP.open for anyone to join.

We Tweet Twoo: [69c485aa-f448-43cd-a3e6-a88dc9e7db8c.png]

Contribute: Help us build this wikipedia style website by editing or writing
articles, biographies, success stories or auditor pages. See "About
Scientolipedia" for more info.
Your financial support will help ensure this project continues to grow.
[aa846e52-ba09-440c-b093-220f058949c8.png]

Forward This Newsletter to your friends and mailing lists.
OR - send us your list and we'll add it to ours.
If not already subscribed - Subscribe to Scientolipedia News
Copyright ? 2017 Scientolipedia.org, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this because you have indicated you like good news and
wins about Scientology. (the subject - not the church)

Our mailing address is:
Scientolipedia.org2479 Murfreesboro Rd
#139
Nashville, TN 37217

Add us to your address book


unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences 

Email Marketing Powered by MailChimp
[open.php?u=2115c26efc03ae5448527ff7d&id=ee095adbe5&e=f0fb6e2086]

MISSED (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


MISSED AND BYPASSED


> Homer,
>
> Say more about the difference between missed vs. bypassed?
>
> - CBW

The bank consists mostly of efforts impacting with efforts.
resulting in a ridge, more aptly described as a congealed mass or huge
lump of clay.

Efforts can be simple pushes and pulls, but they can also be
twists, turns, shears, mushing and generally banging the hell out of
things.

Like taffy, or two balls of colored clay pushed together, after
enough efforts mangling on it, it can get very mixed up.

Take a ball of clay and exert every conceivable effort on it that
you can think of. And while doing this try to spot where you have
done this to the masses in your body, spine, rump and head. Also spot
where you are trying to do this to others or have.

Sometimes ridges are formed with very direct straight line
efforts against each other. Sort of like trying to nail a hole closed
with stuff. Sometimes there are complex levers and rods and wheels
and gears involved, sort of like a mental machine.

A perfect duplication is doing the effort again from both sides
of the ridge exactly as it was originally done. except this time with
awareness, intention and compassion and gentleness.

First time you slammed the door shut never to have it open again.

Second time you very deliberately push the door shut more and it
opens and you hold it partially closed so it doesn't slam open, and
you release what is behind the door, and you certainly don't slam it
shut again, and eventually you can let go and the door is open.

Or take a lever, it needs to be pushed in an exact direction to
makes its effect.

A miss is you bump into the lever, it wiggles, perhaps it even
moves in the direction it is supposed to go because your angle of hit
was 3 degrees off the mark, but it does not go all the way, and you
never see that you didn't do the exact right effort to push the lever
to its proper position, in fact you didn't even see that there was a
lever there to be pushed, you just know you ran into something that
sort of 'gave' a bit before resisting your motion.

That's a miss.

A bypass is you push the lever exactly as it is supposed to be
pushed, but you don't wait the appropriate time for the effect or you
don't hold it in the pushed position for a while, or you don't do it a
few times to really get the feel of doing it, and you get disgusted
with the no change or too much change and you walk away from it.

Or you get distracted. Or you get scared and you pull back on
the lever trying to undo quickly what you just released. All these
result in Q&A's of a clean reoperation to non event status of the
original effort that made the ridge.

At the chain level, the main thing that engrams do to a person is
they cause him to dramatize against his already existing masses in his
bank. Thus in running what was done to the person, you need to make
sure that he is spotting what he was doing during the incident, as he
is busy making the inner taffy worse.

Running incidents R3R doesn't just work because it runs out the
efforts and the impacts of the incident itself, which it does, it
works because it gets the pc to unwittingly reoperate what he did in
the incident that made the inner taffy worse.

An incident is defined here as an impingement of too much or too
little effort causing the pc to dramatize making nothing of something
forever or making something of nothing forever.

He mainly dramatizes on his inner taffy.

When the pc concentrates on the external trappings of the
incident, he will end up running the incident over and over and over
again will little change because the change he needs to run is the
mess he made of his inner taffy. Thus you hear auditors say "we ran
this incident for 20 hours at least 100 times though and finally the
pc had a huge win." Yeah, the pc finally ACCIDENTALLY managed to
reoperate the taffy messing enough times to produce the release.

This is generally caused by a pc who has no idea what he is
doing, he has no idea WHY running an incident causes a release, and
nor does the auditor, and so the auditor directs the pc to the
external impingments to the exclusion of the inner fight.

Every incident on a chain has the pc making a mess of his inner
taffy, just beating the day lights out of his bank clay ball. He
needs to duplicate what he did to the clay ball to get free. We run
the external incidents to find the moments he did these things to the
inner bank and by duplicating those actions, we undo the inner
solidification that took place during the external incidents.

If one starts at the first incident (earliest) on the chain and
look at the efforts the pc did to the clay ball, we will see that they
are similar but not identical to the efforts he did to the clay ball
during the second incident (later) on the chain. Likewise for the
third and fourth and later incidents.

During the second incident he will be exerting efforts that are
close to AND THUS MISS the efforts he exerted during the first
incident, which will thus restimulate and start to produce a release
of the first incident, but because the efforts only nudge the levers
in the right direction, or touch obliquely on the nail points of the
first incident, the release will not complete and in fact more charge
will be created and thus the first incident is now worse for the
second incident.

In running chains from last to first, one should pay attention to
the inner efforts against the taffy/clay ball of ones own bank as one
runs the external trappings of the incident.

Then in looking for an 'earlier similar' incident, one does NOT
look for similar external trappings, one looks for the incident whose
inner efforts to mangle the taffy were most missed by the efforts of
the later incident just run.

One can go WAY down the track very fast on this if one knows what
one is looking for. Pcs tend to look for earlier similar incidents by
narrative or AESP. But that assumes the earlier incident is in a
similar context or world milieu where the same external trappings had
meaning, fell off horse, all alone, trying to survive, must do it
alone, heavy impact etc.

This limits one to incidents within the same world context, there
have to be horses, or survival, or aloneness or survival, or heavy
impact etc.

The only thing really common to incidents is effort. Efforts
makes ridges, nothing else does.

By looking for the earlier incident using external trappings, one
finds only incidents in recent or even conceivable history and this is
very limited. The pc may eventually go WHOLE WHOLE track but only
after many run throughs and much grind, and he kind of gets thrown
there by the despair of ever getting out of session.

He's getting hungry after 3 hours of marathon running, and he
knows damn well he is going to starve to death before he gets an F/N
on this process, so out of despair he says, ok to hell with this, and
bang he is into something real WAY down the track.

It's may produce a fantastic win, but he won't want more auditing
because getting there was a crap shoot and he doesn't know if he can
'do it again' and next time he will probably starve to death before
the auditor lets him out of session.

If the pc looks instead to the inner taffy he is pounding while
running the first incident, he will naturally come across the next
true earlier similar incident that he should be running, because the
efforts that the true earlier similar incident pounded in the taffy
are freshly missed by running the later incident. Having oriented
himself to the proper earlier place and stance of fight in the inner
taffy, he can then look back outward and orient himself to what the
actual external incident must have been, that he needs to 'run'.

He is never running other than the pounding he did on the inner
taffy, and in fact a pc who can run the inner taffy doesn't need to
run out incidents at all and will protest being forced to find such as
he is running so far and deep down the whole track that its totally
out of context with anything that can be put into words or even
understood by our present consciousness.

"He who speaks knows not" applies, and if he is describing what's
happening in the incident, then he's WAY late on the chain.

Thus incidents keep each other in restimulation by missing the
inner efforts of the earlier incidents.

The earlier incident may have had this HUGE lever that got pushed
or this fathomless pit just pounded in with clay, and the later
incident is just this tiny little fellow bouncing around in his rock
hard masses causing vibrations in the lever and feet marks in the
clay. So when going earlier similar with this technique one needs to
think BIG, each earlier similar is 10 to 100 times bigger than the
later incident.

The above is also why

"When did I make this worse?"

is such a powerful process. It allows the pc to spot incidents
in this life or past conceivable history, where no matter who did what
to whom, he can see what he did to himself WHILE everyone else was
doing what to whom. This runs all 3 flows of external trappings and
at the same time runs the flow 0 which is internal to every incident
of the other 3 flows.

Get this, he is going down a chain of earlier similar time 'he
made this worse', and ending up in all kinds of flow 1 2 and 3
incidents that produced the same inner theme of ruin and pounded
taffy.

Mother slaps him, murders him, kills herself. Big deal.

What he does to the taffy inside him is something else. That is
what needs to be run and duplicated out of existence.

Flow 0 is not a separate flow from other flows, it underlies all
other flows and goes on during all other flows.

It is not enough to audit the 52 perceptics of the outer
trappings of incidents.

If you don't audit the Flow 0 going on during the Flows 1 2 and
3, then you won't have a proper channel to go earlier similar on.

Homer

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sat Nov 25 12:00:03 EST 2017
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/missed
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFaGaGTURT1lqxE3HERAoUeAKCVmOm+NyUFGvTTjwhfPn9dgVyLpACgo18t
tUwoqUO2b4880haJ8bnfbS0=
=U1C6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l

ORIENTATION POINTS AND SYMBOLS AGAIN

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


ORIENTATION POINTS AND SYMBOLS AGAIN

"How do I know? It's want I want!" - Homer

BASIC INDOCTRINATION

Q1: The static can create spaces and times and locate objects in
them and the forces between them.

These can be real spaces and times, or facsimiles of them.

Both are apparencies in the consciousness of the static.

A static itself has no space nor time, nor dimension, nor motion,
nor frequency nor wavelength, but can nonetheless create apparencies of
each in its own substrate. These apparencies are called kinetics and
exist in apparency only.

A Q1 is any such system of things so created.

Kinetics are the created mechanical conditions of existence
mentioned in the Phoenix Lectures.

The static creates the apparency of kinetics via postulates and
considerations.

Let there be space, let there be time, let there be ... etc

The kinetic operates within itself solely via force acting upon
matter and energy, through space and time.

The postulates and considerations are true cause creating virtual
space and time, and force is virtual cause inside of that space and
time.

Q comes from QED, which stands for Quod Erat Demonstratum, latin
for 'what which was to be demonstrated.'

QED is usually put at the end of proofs, where the final line is
'that which was to be demonstrated', but in this case Q1 comes at the
beginning of the logical argument from which all other things follow,
rather than at the end of it where QED is usually written.

TWO MODES

The static works in two modes.

The static as creator works in orientation point mode.

The static as creature works in symbol mode.

It is called an orientation point, because the static in native
state has not yet created any space or time or dimension of any size or
kind, and thus is a zero dimensional actuality called a scalar.

The normal being tends to judge 'where it is' by where it is
relative to its main orientation points in life such as the sun, his
city, or home.

But while the being is in orientation mode creating a Q1 of space
and time, it is its own orientation point, the eternal here and now,
forever still and unmovable, as there is nowhere else to be, and there
is no space or time to move in.

POINTS, SCALARS and MANIFOLDS

Calling a scalar object a point is a bad misnomer because a point
is usually considered to be a small part of a dimensional space or time,
whereas a scalar is not a part of anything.

The opposite of scalar is a manifold, meaning many fold, or more
than zero dimensions. A manifold of course can have many points in it,
and is often considered to be made of points. But each point has a size
and a dimension, even if the size is 0x0x0 for a 3 dimensional point.

A scalar does not have dimensions and so of course it has no size
either, as size is merely the measure of the length of each dimension
called the extension of that dimension.

Thus a 2x4x5 bar of gold is a 3 dimensional object with extensions
of 2, 4 and 5 along each dimension. 2,4,5 is the size of the object,
and indicates it has 3 dimensions and thus 3 extensions with a total
volume of 40 cubic units of gold.

Any Q1 is an apparent manifold of space, time and the objects in
them, and the forces between them that change their motion.

Thus the static scalar creates kinetic manifolds called Q1's.

As the static creates space and times, it is still exterior to
them, and can orient them any way it wishes relative to its own
viewpoint, and it can orient the objects relative to each other, inside
the space and time.

Any object inside a space time is called a symbol, and has
mass/energy, meaning and motion.

THE FLIP FLOP

The static can flip flop between orientation mode and symbol mode
at will.

In orientation mode the static is creating Q1's of symbols, and in
symbol mode the static has become one or more of those symbols fighting
against other symbols.

If one is being a symbol inside a Q1, one way to become the
orientation point again is to BE the orientation mode becoming the
symbol mode.

One can't become the symbol without first BEING the orientation
point.

One becomes trapped into being a symbol and unable to become an
orientation point again, by not wanting to be the symbol which renders
one unable to become the orientation point, because orientation points
like to become symbols.

One way to get out of being a detested symbol is to become some
other symbol instead, because this momentarily operates one's self as
the orientation point in order to create, put there, and become the new
symbol.

It is the willingness to come in that puts one out. One does not
have to come in, in order to be out, but one does have to be out in
order to come in.

The orientation point is the manifestation of willingness to
manifest.

The symbol is the manifestation of unwillingness to manifest.

Any symbol that is claiming how happy it is that it's a symbol, is
whistling past its own grave yard, for all symbols are incipient carrion
and dust in the wind one day.

WHERE IS THE STATIC?

The actual position of the static relative to the Q1 it is making
during orientation mode is not 'outside' the Q1, nor is it on the
surface of the Q1, nor is it inside either, its pretty ineffable.

The static is self aware, and as such can appear to itself as a
static scalar which is its true nature, or as a kinetic manifold which
is it's dreamtime nature.

Thus the static feels it IS the Q1, which makes it easy for the
static to withdraw further INTO the Q1 and become only a part of it,
namely a symbol inside it.

During symbol mode the static is definitely being some symbol with
an exact location in the space and time of the Q1.

It has lost contact with its source location from where it put the
Q1 there in the first place.

Thus the symbol comes to believe that the Q1 is itself the
orientation point, and the symbol judges its position relative to where
it is inside the Q1.

CASE

The static is able to create a symbol that it would NEVER want to
be after it has created and become it.

That is a big statement, dig it and don't leave it.

Thus the static as orientation point is alien to itself as symbol.
particularly with regard to desire and motivation.

When people talk about the 'fear of God', they are refering to this
fear of the symbol for the orientation point.

It's called Cosmic Trepidation.

The motivations of the static scalar are not the motivations of the
kinetic symbol.

The motivations of the symbol are to win the game of survival.

The motivations of the static are to invent a game of survival.

Since the static, as eternal spaceless, timeless scalar, can't do
anything BUT survive (outside of time), this creating itself as a
kinetic symbol scurrying around trying to survive in an eat or be eaten
game, is a bit of a joke that the scalar likes to play on itself.

This is not an error or a mistake, this is what the Cosmic All
DOES.

Thus movement in space and time away from the first moment of
creation is a joke.

The static wants to be a symbol, but no symbol would ever want to
be either a symbol or a static!

You might think that being a static would be great, but statics
like to become symbols, so that places kind of a cloud over the whole
thing.

This alieness is felt by the symbol as Cosmic Ominous-ness, or Omni
Awesome Omni Numinous-ness as Adore likes to call it. - Adore.com

Fear of God indeed.

Being created without one's consent is the ultimate rape, matched
only by being uncreated without one's consent too!

A well done symbol state has no awareness of its creative
orientation point state, and so the symbol always has this small bone to
chew with God.

"You made me!"

That is called Separation of God and Soul.

It is a faux apparency but makes the Cosmic All go.

here

There would be no reason to run around in space and time if you
weren't a little pissed at your Creator.

This separation thus alloys the affinities of the symbol for all of
existence including itself and its creator with divine trepidation.

The love of the symbol is tainted with fear.

So much for your 'happy' mortal meatball.

This traps the symbol in the Q1 that it is unwilling to have made
himself or put in by anyone.

Symbols are inherently not friendly towards anything that can truly
put things there.

Because only orientation points can put things there, and the
symbol can't put orientations points there!

Ah if the symbol could only create God, it wouldn't mind so much if
it were then created by that God in return.

ELSEWHERENESS

The symbol tries to escape from its predicament with existence to
points deeper inside the Q1, called elsewhereness, but it takes its
created existingness with it and thus its predicament.

No matter where the symbol goes, it will always be a made being.

People hate being made to do things, being made to exist is the
basic on the chain.

The tone scale is the story of the symbol trying and failing each
step along the way to run away from its own enforced existingness.

The symbol eventually invents death forever, but its a belief and a
deceit that only provides temporary relief for a while until the symbol
dies and it doesn't work, the being is still there craving being another
symbol.

Only a crazy God could call death a relief anyhow, we call these
beings 'had time enough for love' cases.

The symbol doesn't want to escape the Q1 by putting it there again,
and becoming the orientation point, because it is worried about what it
might again create afterwards.

"Who or what would create a human?"
"Who or what would choose to BECOME a human?"

If that ain't creep one, the symbol doesn't know what would be.

The willingness of the symbol to be able to choose freely is
sundered by this ARC break between the motivations of the symbol and the
motivations of the orientation point.

"Just what is God up to anyhow?"

As ARC depends upon REALITY or AGREEMENT to bolster affinity, the
absence of reality and agreement between symbol and orientation point
causes an alloying of the natural affinity of the sovereign static with
debasing non sovereign anger, fear, and sorrow.

Enthusiasm of the symbol in action is a kind of social facade based
on the carrier wave of horror and sorrow.

"The world sucks but mayber I can DO something about it."

By becoming the symbol the static has turned itself against itself.

The static as the symbol no longer trusts its own intentions or
good sense as the orientation point.

It sets about to learn a lesson to never do THAT again.

The symbol finally finds the break in affinity between itself and
whatever created it so bad, that the symbol gives up forever more any
sense of responsibility for having created itself as a symbol.

THE SYMBOL ISN'T BE WILLING TO CREATE ITSELF AS A SYMBOL, THERE
FORE THE SYMBOL CAN'T BE WHAT CREATED IT!

At that point the symbol is damned forever by its own hand inside
of time.

The primary must never happen again is being an orientation point
choosing to become a symbol.

*CHOICE* gets a bad name.

The primary identity of the symbol is the sum total of all the
things in the cosmic all that the symbol is just sure he didn't choose.

This defines the beingness or becomingness of the symbol, what it
is, is what it didn't choose, didn't put there.

The symbol defines itself as a bundle of righteous protest.

The sailor is not the guy who put the ocean and boats there, it's
the guy who DIDN'T put the sharks and storms there!

The symbol is someone or something who wouldn't, couldn't,
shouldn't and DIDN'T choose THAT!

This alienness between orientation point and symbol, is not a
mistake.

It is a necessary function of the Cosmic All.

Therre is no peace for a symbol.

There is only peace for the orientation point.

It is inevitable for persistence to persist for a while because the
symbol resists becoming the orientation point again lest it chooses to
become another symbol worse than the one it is.

So the symbol feels more comfortable being a symbol even amidst
hell and high water.

Divinity means all powerful self responsible good.

Holy means care operating divinity. - Adore.com

GOOD AUTHOR AND GOOD CHARACTER

Remember that a good author (orientation point) is not the same
goodness as a good character (symbol), because good authors write good
stories filled with good and evil characters!

Someone in a dream asked me,

"When was the very first moment I became awake in this life?"

I asked him "What do you mean by awake?"

He said, "Aware of good and evil."

If stories had only good characters in them, no one would read
them.

If orientation points made only good symbols, no one would engage
the game.

So divinity is the orientation point author, and it behooves the
symbol to walk carefully and competently through the orientation point's
creation.

And so this rift between God and Soul, Author and Character,
Creator and Creature is a fundamental part of the makeup of the Cosmic
All.

Without this rift, space and time would not move forward,
and existence wouldn't persist beyond the next sneeze.

Time comes from the determination to DO something about the
intolerable.

Amidst the apparent almost infinite danger of being a symbol, this
rift is all that causes persistence of the being as a symbol.

Thus the being is actually as safe as he can be willing to put
himself there, as his own orientation point.

No persistence can persist beyond the letting go of putting it
there.

The orientation point has no problem with danger, its inherent
safety is absolute and unimpingable.

Thus its impulse to become a symbol in danger has no hesitation nor
restraint, as long as its only for a while, because in the end the
orientation can not be destroyed, and can not get lost as there is no
where to get lost in.

THE ORIENTATION POINT KNOWS ITS A DREAM. THE SYMBOL DOESN'T.

They symbol is below apparencies are actuality on the tone
scale.

And since ALL time is created in finite whiles, no symbol can last
forever, one day all symbols must attain the awakened state and return
to eternal unimpingable peace.

Thus although there are no heavens forever, there are no hells
forever either.

But the being can remanifest a new while of heavens and hells any
time he wishes, once the old whiles are done.

The only thing that lasts 'forever' is people and peace, and that's
an eternal forever outside of time, not a temporal forever where in
flowers grow, inside of time.

"The grass may die, and the flowers may wilteth away, but the Word
of God shall stand forever for free." - Bible.

WHO IS UPSET WITH WHO

Religion lies to us that the Soul needs to be reconciled to God.

That God finds sin so odious, that God can not countenance the soul
until it is cleansed of its sin.

The truth is God has no problem at all with the Soul.

God has no feeling that He will never live his creation of the Soul
down.

But God certainly needs to be reconciled to the Soul, or the soul
will not make case gain.

Until then the Soul is a 'Afraid to find out' case.

Humor results from the recognition of the recompleted GodSoul that
the Soul *IS* God incarnation by its own hand, it always has been,
always will be, and couldn't ever be any other way in any universe
anywhere.

That would be called INTEGRITY, awareness of wholeness on the part
of the GodSoul that it is both God and Soul co eternal.

Life Repair then should produce Awareness of Truth and the way to
personal Integrity and Freedom.

The truth is God and Soul are one, and integrity is being able to
operate both modes freely.

That is freedom.

This puts the being square on the rung of RECOGNITION on the
awarness characteristic scale.

Recognition that all of life is God in carnation.

Orientation point pretending to be symbol.

It is only this unwillingness of the symbol to be the symbol that
prevents the static from being able to be the orientation mode again.

Thus can't = won't.

The resistence is of the symbol against the orientation point, not
the resistence of the orientation point against the symbol.

The basic can't, is can't be an orientation point again.

The basic won't, is won't be an orientation point again.

Orientation mode is home, symbol mode is lost.

Thrill is always the effort to get lost.

Romance is always the effort to get home.

Halcyon is bemused relief on the verge of time.

The static goes from putting things there, to trying to find out
where he put it.

The static goes from "It's a..." to "What's it?"

From Answer to Question.

Hell is eternal question asking. For a while :)

The purpose of auditing is to flip the static as symbol back from
"What's it?" to "It's a!".

Lord save us from stupid auditors.

THE RUB

The static likes to engage in being symbols that it would NEVER
create as a symbol!

No human would create a human, oh no that would be playing God!

And boy do we hate God.

So we assign to God the atrocity of creating humans, and claim that
God works in mysterious ways, which stops all further inquiry into the
matter and frees God from any culpability for having done so.

We pretend we can't ever understand God, because we hope we never
will understand God, because doing so we fear would result in a
permanent nightmare of sleeping forever with a composite of evil and
criminality beyond our wildest dreams, as our bed partner.

"Who really wants to know the mind of God?"

PAN DETERMINISM

The static as orientation point is pan determined.

Especially one that came up with eating, death and sex.

SPACE TIME GAME STREAMS

Statics create playing fields made of space, time, matter/energy,
and force, and the rules of causation between them.

These are called Q1s or space time game streams.

Games are made of symbols in contentious co operation, for suvival.

Oh yeah, you can have pretty little game streams that just dance
along, but they never last long.

The difference between a dance and a game is, in the game you can
LOSE.

The seriousness of the consequences of losing determines the
seriousness of the game.

The static creates the playing field, the pieces, the game rules,
the players, the umpires, the vendors, the half time band, and the
spectators, and then jumps into the game as one or more of them, never
all.

So there is always opposition and contention.

The static also co creates a unanimous INVITE to his Q1, broadcast
to other statics who are interested in his game stream and who want to
play a part or help co-design it.

It's your dream, how did everyone else get into it?

And how did you get into theirs?

Thus auditing unanimous invite and its break down is productive.

Games decay down to unanimous UNinvite where all players are
fighting each trying to destroy each other and the game because they
can't extract them selves from the game and detest the players.

The only way to unextract oneself from an unwanted game is to put
the original unanimous invite there for and from everyone all around and
the admiration between all the players for themselves and each other.

Good games are made of worthy opponents.

REGENCY and SCOPE, SPAN, DEPTH AND FIELD

"Regency is universal acceptance by others, outside of one's own
normal operating jurisdictions, by virtue of needed, wanted, and
acknowledged superior operating know how.

In Excelsis Deo." - Adore.com

The regency of a particular static playing at being a symbol in
fair play, is measured by its scope, span, depth and field.

Scope is the size of the playing field the static can handle.

Span is the number of different symbols in that field that the
static can handle at the same time.

The Red Barron had no problem taking on three enemy airplanes at
the same time, but never four.

Depth is the amount of knowledge the static has about each symbol
it is handling.

Field is the static's reputation in the field amongst other statics
involved in the same Q1.

The static creates panoplies of symbols in order to become one or
more of them in order to engage in the game of self determinism vs other
determinism.

Thus games consist of freedoms (abilities), purposes (goals), and
barriers (oppositions).

BLACKNESS

To the degree that the symbol is unwilling to be the orientaton
point, the games he engages in become non optimum.

You can't play well when you don't want to play.

And you can't want to play, no matter what the game is, if you
think you didn't choose to play it.

A non optimum game is one that he wins too much or too little.

Thus action and play decline, and eventually the symbol starts to
rue the game he is in, and begins to do something other than play it by
the rules.

He falls for corruption, temptation and seduction, and starts to
play the game of getting others to play the game for him and give him
the winnings.

Corruption is the chink in the armor of his integrity through which
shines the light of temptation.

Seduction is giving into temptation.

Lower down he starts to run out of games completely, and finally
engages in the game of games, if he loses that one he won't have any
more games to play forever for free.

All games become unwilling games, because the symbol is unwilling
to be the symbol, and unwilling to have existence exist.

The symbol fails to put things there in order to remove them from
the game, and at no time is he putting the game there, not like he did
as the orientation point that created the Q1 wherein his game resides.

At first he will stiff upper lip it by saying 'Ain't life grand!",
and then he will sour grapes it by saying "Eh, I didn't want that
anyhow!" but then he will fall down to "Nope life sucks!" and start to
lay black curtains over the parts he no longer wants to know about or
forget FOREVER.

THE FOUR CONDITIONS OF EXISTENCE

They are:

As-isness the original moment of putting it there.

Alter-isness the addition of significance and questions,
to what has been put there,
this causes time and persistence as an is-ness.

Is-ness the resulting persistence in time.

Not-isness the denial of an is-ness by covering it in
black, invisibility, mass and force.

There are thus 4 types of cases, corresponding to the predominant
use by the being of the 4 conditions of existence.

THE AS-ISNESS case

The as-isness case is mostly involved in putting things there, and
is aware he is doing so. Things 'last' as long as he continues to reput
them there and they vanish as soon as he takes his attention off of
them, they become as if never created.

This guy is 'ever new'.

For example, the being puts a spider there and continues to put the
spider there knowingly and willingly with full awareness of the
consequences of which there are none because he isn't putting any there.

The as-isness case is mostly involved in creating 'ever news'.

The as-isness case is the easiest to audit, because he can spot the
he is putting things there in real time, and cease doing so in real
time.

His main 'problem is getting things to persist' with out having to
put them there constantly himself.

He seeks impingment and other determinism to freely engage with.

(By other determinism we DO NOT mean that the being has fallen down
to being determined by others, it means the being is fully self
determined in a co acting group of other fully self determined beings.

The other determined being, that is being determined BY OTHERS, is
at the bottom of the tone scale.

He is in the valence of someone else whom he tried to other
determine earlier and failed/regretted it and so became it by doing a
life continuum on it.)

THE ALTER-ISNESS CASE

The alter-isness case is mostly involved in trying to get things to
persist through alteration.

In the first moment of time (as-is) the being puts a spider there.

In the second moment of time (alter-is) he questions

"Where the HELL did THAT come from!?

And what should I *DO* about it?"

In the second moment of time he is no longer in direct contact with
the first moment of time where it is clear to him that HE is putting the
spider there.

So in the second moment of time he becomes seriously worried about
his sovereignty and "who or what is cause around here and why is it such
an asshole!?"

He also becomes hell bent trying to determine (figure out by
question asking) what to DO about the spider, which is beginning to
agitate like its going to come after him and bite him, totally based on
the static's new found worry about spiders. :)

Notice 'to determine' above means to learn by looking which
is symbol mode operation.

In orientation mode "to determine" means to make it so
by putting it there.

This question asking about what to DO about the spider
PREPOSTULATES that the spider is there, and will not vanish on is own,
and thus by seeking what to do about the spider he unwittingly causes
its persistance.

And Lord save him, if he worries that the spider will come after
him and eat him, it will.

His postulate that it MIGHT guarantees that it WILL given enough
time.

The alter-is case is also relatively easy to audit, as he is only
one moment of time separated from the first moment of putting something
there.

The skilled auditor can get the being to take his attention off of
WHAT TO DO about the spider long enough to slip him back into the
original moment of putting it there, at which point the question "Where
the hell did that come from?" is answered, and "What should I DO about
it" is to stop putting it there.

The usual response of the preclear to this auditing will be
something like "Curses, woken up again!"

Notice that in the absence of auditing during the second moment of
time, the preclear will go into a FAILED WHY FINDING on "Where the hell
did that come from?" either through a NO WHY or a WRONG WHY, and start
to take up very seriously "What should I DO about it?"

Notice also that DOING something about something means PUTTING
SOMETHING MORE THERE.

So he has put a spider there, considers he can't just vanish it,
and thus goes on a rampage of putting MORE things there to stop the
spider from coming after him and eating him.

Walls, bombs, cages, armies, raid, whatever.

This results in mass and persistence galore surrounding the being,
and away we go into a games civilization.

A game is simply and only putting something MORE there to handle an
original as-isness he couldn't get rid of (by intent).

Look at all the trouble the guy goes through to get the football on
the other side of the goal post.

You want a touch down?

Why not just put it there?

Because CHASE and playing are more important than winning.

This results in an ISNESS case.

THE ISNESS CASE (DOING CASE).

The isness case has achieved optimum persistence for game play, and
its all very serious and important, and the glory is rich and rewarding.

Even though no isness game can ever be truly won forever.

Yeah you might be able to blow the spider up, but somewhere somehow
the bitch is in heat again.

A being can never win over or get rid of anything 'he isn't put
there' or is still wondering where it came from or who did put it there
because he wants to kill them forever.

It doesn't matter who put it there originally, only who is putting
there now, him.

Thus good can never win over evil, because good would never put
evil there to fight.

Yes, good might get up in the morning and be glad there is evil to
fight, but what good would ever say "Hey there isn't enough evil around
any more to fight, I think we will have to create some!"

Go'wan, Tell me I am wrong.

Isness cases are hard to audit if only because they are happy
chasing 'doomed'.

Chasing dooming others to avoid being doomed themselves.

They are particularly enamored of games where the winner is the
last one standing.

But they can start to get TOO doomed, they have lost awareness of
how to put and not put or unput games there, and so their games start to
decay into a non optimum game experience.

Game experience is measured by the amount of action and length of
the volley.

Some games are too easy to win, some are too hard to win.

In some the being ends off dead out of the gate, and others make
him suicidally bored.

Auditing at this level is hard because of the layers of
irresponsibility holding the failed games together, and the lust for
pride and glory based on winning over great odds.

He's not interested in getting out of games, he want to stop
winning or losing games!

He wants to PLAY forever!

Overtime, overtime, overtime...

The never ending volley.

The preclear has to learn how to turn the odds knob back up, and
difficulty knob back down, and become game writer again, and not just
game player.

Once the preclear feels he is in a game again that HE designed or
has control over, he becomes a formidable player because he WANTS the
game and he wants to play, consequences of winning or loosing be damned.

He will put those consequences there too, so they are HIS
consequeences.

He can do this all on a via, pay someone else to design the game
and its consequences for him, but its work for hire, he owns the game
completely.

And proudly he will show off how much he paid for it, and how good
he is at it, and recount his exploits of who doomed who, to the end of
time to anyone who will listen.

So auditing the ISNESS case is mostly auditing game theory, game
optimization and rehabbing high action games of chase and demise.

"Invent a game."

However in the absence of auditing, games become scarce.

There are just no good games to play, and pretty soon you find the
being STUCK in games he HAS to play but doesn't want to.

He is now trying to end the game rather than play it, and he will
try to win or lose the game by any means just to get rid of it forever
more.

That's called out ethics.

Why would you be in a game if you didn't want to play it, no good
will come of that.

The being falls down to comitting overts against the game and its
players, cheating, getting others to play for him, take the risks, and
give him the rewards, etc.

He becomes a mob member.

But this kicks back at him too, in one life he is an enforcer, in
the next he is the enforced.

Eventually he tries to die in the game, by covering it all in black
and taking on disabilities that make sure he CAN'T PLAY.

And in session he can't remember anything and is terrified of
living any of it down if he does.

And this is your NOT-ISNESS case, covered in blackness,
invisibility, mass and force.

THE NOT-ISNESS CASE

The not-isness case is the hardest to audit, he doesn't WANT to get
better or be more able , he wants to be better able to be unbetter and
NOT able.

The only safety left for him is to be as undangerous as possible to
his enemies and the environment closing in on him.

The very idea that he wants to fight his enemies will trigger their
radar, so he lives with that idea turned off.

However no fighting means no game.

Worse he is also mostly unaware of who he is, where he is, and when
he is, and certainly unaware of who is after him and what the nature of
his environment really is.

Eventually he becomes a meatball, and isn't even aware that he is a
he.

REMEDY OF BLACKNESS

Most auditing at higher levels is directed at remedying games, but
this guy has all his games covered in blackness and he is terrified the
blackness will go away.

He used his last ounce of free theta to lay down the last layer of
blackness, but was fortunate enough to blame it on something else so
that it would stick on its own.

But now he's got no theta left to make more blackness should his
existing blackness fail him.

Remember the precear has come a long ways down like so:

Putting it there
Lying about it
Putting something more there to handle the first
Lying about that too
etc.

So at any moment of time, the preclear IS engaging in more putting
something more there (as-isness), to cover up something earlier.

This means if you can get the preclear to look IN PRESENT TIME at
the very latest incarnation of putting something there to deal with
something earlier, you can get him to let go of that last layer of
putting something there, and the prior layer will show up!

This is why when auditing a preclear on problems, you want to audit
his SOLUTIONS, not the problem!

To hell with the first time he had the problem, find the first time
he had the solution.

Once all the solutions are gone, the problem will revert to a
simple 'putting it there' which he can then not put there.

That's Grade I, ability to recognize the source of problems and
make them vanish.

But he is terrified of the last layer showing up, he is just sure
he doesn't have the power to cover it back up again, should he remember
WHAT he is trying to cover up.

So rather than remedy havingness on games, the auditor has to
rememdy havingness on covering up games and their travail forever more.

Now in the PDC's this preclear is called a Step V which is probably
generous for most of them, who are really VI's nd VII's pretending to be
V's.

They are also called Black V's, because all 5 senses are blocked
out on their time track and all they can see is blackness and
invisibility, and they can't make any real, solid, colorful, high
affinity mockups, and they can't move on their track.

They are HIDING IN their track in moments of blackness so they
don't have to see what is ahead of them on their track.

They are doing this in present time, but they are hiding from a
moment in the past on their time track by sticking themselves even
earlier in blackness.

What they fear is ahead of where they are on their track in
blackness, but its still an event in the past.

Should they move up to that event it will reviv as something going
on in present time.

That's when the auditor had better know what he is doing, because
THE AUDITOR will be placed in one of the valences in the incident, as
will anyone trying to help the preclear.

Thus help can be perceived as harm during the reviv.

In fact if no case gain is being made during routine auditing of a
black V, the auditor is probably a perfect match for someone in the
incident on the other side of a table, questioning the preclear.

If the auditor restimulates the preclear's Nemesis One in this
fashion, his most detested and feared enemy, no auditing will take
place, the preclear will audit ANYTHING but the incident he is sitting
in, BECAUSE the auditor as his Nemesis One is sitting in the room right
there in it too!

That's too close for comfort for the preclear, he might confront a
Nemesis One or two a few light years away and 2000 centuries in the
future, but not right across the table from him.

Attempts to solve this problem in early auditing with "Who am I?",
trying to get the preclear in present time with regard to the auditor,
if no one else, are met with gales of laughter from the Nemesis One
valences in the primary incident waiting to reviv.

So Ron said the only way to audit a Step V preclear was to remedy
havingness by remedying BLACKNESS. (Standard Operating Procedure SOP-1)

Have him mockup blackness until the preclear is comfortable that he
has enough for any situation.

COUNTER INTUITIVE TRUTHS

If you look at the entire gestalt and context of the preclear
across his entire existence a certain truth comes through.

If the preclear says he has too much of something, it means he has
too little of it.

He can't get rid of it, because he won't make more of it.

If he won't put it there, make more of it as it is, he can't vanish
it either, just by letting it go.

He is TERRIFIED of being better, of having exactly and only what he
wants.

Oh God, does ABLE mean DISASTER to him.

"Get the idea of being worse."
"Get the idea of being better."

If the preclear says he has too little of something, that means he
has too much of it.

But again he won't make more of it, because he's afraid he won't be
able to stop making too much of it.

He is on a must create, can't not create.

Of which he is not making more of by putting it here.

The solution to both problems is to make more of it, until the
preclear can make whatever it is forever for free, and then stop making
it.

Then he can put an optimum amount of it there and go his way.

The guy who mopes and whines about not having any girl friends,
Jesus Christ, just open up his track a little bit and he has had so many
girl friends, love and collateral damage he can't count that high.

The guy is in solitary confinement in this life to give him some
respite from unsolitary CONFINEMENT in the past, so many people he just
couldn't move through them to get to the bathroom.

He just couldn't get away from them all particularly the harems and
the kids, and the grandkids, just on and on.

The guy who is 'alone' in this life, take a look at how many beings
are trying to communicate to him telepathically but can't due to his
mind wrapped around in the wall of China, so no one can find him.

Just so, this applies to blackness.

The preclear SAYS he has too much blackness, but the truth is he
doesn't have enough.

He also feels he has no control over what blackness he has.

He is terrified the blackness will simply fall down and he will see
what's underneath it, with no ability to put it back up again.

Do you have any idea how long it took him to forget his most
detested incident?

Let alone bury or sell off on craig's list every part of himself
that was involved?

It took him FOREVER to build up the walls of blackness, NOTHING
THERE and DIDN'T HAPPEN that he presently has, he feels he just doesn't
have it in him to do it again.

Its like worrying about opening a door with a hurricane going on
the other side.

You only want to open it if you know you can close it immediately
if things are too bad.

So you get the preclear to creatively mockup blackness until he
KNOWS he has so much blackness NOTHING could be so bad he couldn't just
cover it up again forever for free instantly and be done with it.

The free bit is because we aren't talking about rehabbing the
ability to create something (blackness) with a HUGE EXPENSIVE EFFORT.

He needs to be able to create things with the faintest whiff of
consideration that it's there.

He doesn't make effort with effort, and if he is, he's WAY down the
track using counter efforts as his present time effort.

And even those he is activating with the faintest consideration of
desire.

No, we need an EFFORT FREE creation of what he wants, as much as he
wants, as much as everyone else wants too, until he doesn't need it any
more or feel a scarcity of it, or a crushing suffocating over abundance
of it.

HOW TO AUDIT THE NOT-ISNESS CASE

The primary mistake of the auditor is trying to get the preclear to
tell what is under the blackness.

It is a high crime to audit a not-isness case like an isness case.

This is why "What could you take responsibility for in that
incident?" does not work on a Black V and only makes him worse and hate
auditing.

For one, he doesn't WANT to know, he wants to better be able to NOT
KNOW, and survive well anyhow.

And he can do that for a while.

For two he doesn't know what the incident is and looking into the
blackness won't show it to him, because that's not the way the blackness
works.

Blackness doesn't COVER other things, he has MOVED away from the
detested things on the track to a place of calm peaceful BLACKNESS.

He can only see the other things really by moving out of the
blackness and back up the track to where the things he doesn't want to
see are reviv bright.

He is TERRIFIED of knowing, the fear can kill is body.

THEN maybe he might get around to knowing just a little bit later
on down the road.

He can do that for a while.

The guy who is in terror about something but has no idea what it
is, should never be audited on what it is, but audited on NO and SOME
FEAR until he is stable NOT KNOWING, and he knows nothing can MAKE him
know if he doesn't want to.

Ultimately its all false knowing anyhow being forced on him.

But you gotta go WAY up the pole to get a lasting reality on that.

He is protecting his body after all and all those dynamics that
depend on him to remain alive, like the rest of civilization, and he
won't allow anything to endanger his body just to get better.

Better to be alive and unable than able and dead.

Remember that collateral damage mentioned above?

Well he loved all those girls and kids but they all ended up dead
anyhow.

HOW DID THAT HAPPEN?

He also knows that fear alone can kill his body, so auditing him on
sovereign control over making nothing of fear will go a long ways to
restoring his confidence that when his bank goes BOO! at him, he
doesn't jump out of his skin, leaving it dead on the floor.

And the bank is FILLED with such incidents, his and everyone else's
too.

Those sad eyes.

So don't forget the incredible chain, and don't forget the BOO!
chain.

Blackness is his shield, beef up his shield to near infinity and
get him facile with using it, and he WILL start looking again.

One audits this like one audits any item.

This will probably kill him but,

Get the idea of NO invisibility.
Get the idea of SOME invisibility.

Get the idea of NO blackness.
Get the idea of SOME blackness.

Get the idea of NO mass.
Get the idea of SOME mass.

Get the idea of NO force.
Get the idea of SOME force.

E/P unflapable and Master of Black.

Homer

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com

======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Fri Nov 24 17:01:16 EST 2017
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/ador1043.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFaGJatURT1lqxE3HERAiRSAKCIhrdscxWBr29w8zdrWkG8FkHjugCfUF68
KQgRaBN9CiF2nB/u5YigBGE=
=EadL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l