ADORE834

POWER AND DUTY

I think that power also restimulates duty/rights conflicts.

"If one can help, one SHOULD help."

"Need bestows right."

Both are probably computations born of debt or obligation, but
they are a strong opinion in the eyes of others about you.

A lot of meatballs don't 'believe in God' just because He
apparently isn't doing anything about anything.

For example he wants people to behave, but he won't get rid of
criminals and assholes that tempt us to 'misbehave'.

With inability to do something comes relief from the duty.

With return of power at least comes back the duty to compute
greatest good for greatest number, with people dying and other
collateral damage on both sides of that decision, a being can and has
chosen to go nuts rather than make a decision and take the consequences.

'I didn't sign up for this!' is the refrain.

The OT power protocol rundown as posted here many times needs to
deal with these issues or else people will not be prepared when suddenly
they remember where their Sword of Excalibur is on their hips and how to
pull it.

"What power could you have?"
What could you do with that power?"
How would you feel about that?"

What power could you not have?"
What could you not do with that?"
How would you feel about that?"

Sometimes when a pre OT is just trying to get well and be able to
stand up again with out puking, but just can't can't can't can't, one
has to run the negative,

"What might be the consequences of getting better?"

He will find it astounding how sick one has to be just to be left
alone and survive quietly in this world.

If only left alone by himself from his own calls of duty.

But calls to duty to him by others will play in to it.

Homer

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com

On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Pip wrote:

>
>
> Bob1357 wrote:
>
>> On Jan 8, 11:06 pm, Clearing Archive Roboposter
>> <robopos...@lightlink.com> wrote:
>>
>> <Possibly the greatest liability connected to an Ascension Experience
>> is
>> the misuse of the powers, awarenesses, and abilities contained in the
>> higher universes they go into, to "engulf" others.
>>
>> A further possibilty of how a being lost their power, awareness and
>> abilities contained in those higher universes had to do with
>> "engulfing
>> others". >
>>
>> Just had another ascension experience, but yet again was unable to
>> maintain the perspective. Birds eye view, moving around in a heavy,
>> cumbersome meat suit. Detached from emotion and thought, but connected
>> to all. Actually a pretty great feeling.
>>
>> As fate or the universe would have it, I find myself searching for the
>> "Why can I not maintain this perspective/experience". While blindly
>> searching, I stumble onto this site of tens of millions and click on
>> this post of tens of thousands and there I go. The answer. Misuse of
>> powers - greed and power begin to set in, and as they do, descendancy
>> (for lack of a better word) begins.
>> So yes, I would agree that misuse of powers is possibly the greatest
>> liability and obstacle to overcome connected to an ascension
>> experience. Apparently, I have more house cleaning to do. I suppose
>> when I am ready I'll be ready. Still a major eye opener every time
>> though.
>> Anyway, I thought I would share,
>> ____________________________________
>>
>
> Thanks for sharing. Good work. I once had an experience which led me
> to believe that I was about to acquire great spiritual powers and it
> made me very depressed. I didn't get any powers from that experience
> although it did turn on some life altering phenomena, but years later I
> discovered why I got depressed about it. Once again was in a similar
> position. This time I during a program of processing I realized that
> what I was doing was really working and suddenly I had an overwhelming
> urge to run away from it. Fortunately I didn't and took my feelings up
> in session. It was fear of regaining power. There was a past life
> where I misused great power out of grief and desire for vengence. Soon
> after that session I did re-acquire a paranormal ability but ony for a
> few seconds. Sometimes the problem is about EFFORT. Such abilities
> should be effortless. When You try to "hold on" to it or "maintain" it,
> the counter intention is restimulated. The key may be to apply no
> effort - to completely relax and have no considerations about it.
> Equanimity is easier said than done. In my case I got too excited, then
> scared, then a ton of case-stuff snuffed it out. Just keep chipping
> away.
>
> Pip
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clear-L mailing list
> Clear-L@mailman.lightlink.com
> http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/clear-l
>
Tue Jan 11 13:35:01 EST 2011

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l

ADORE190 (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

BEDROCK

We understand full well that what the parent does to the child does
not 'drive' the child to criminality or insanity but that the child
CHOOSES these things as a solution to what the parent is doing based on
the child's limited wisdom at the time.

This does not excuse the child for its later criminal or
insane behavior, nor does it excuse the parent for its criminal
or insane behavior towards the child.

Nor does it lessen the direct consequences between parental abuse and
aberrant children, and so in the presence of aberrant children it behooves
us to study the parent.

Women will cry "But men had fathers too, why don't you
study them!"

Adore says ignore the cry and study the woman.

Women are the bedrock foundation of a civilization, they are the
ground upon which men and the rest are built.

If the civilization is falling, look to the bedrock, not to the
edifices built upon it.

Homer


- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Fri Sep 27 12:00:04 EDT 2019
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore190.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFdjjIFURT1lqxE3HERAqKeAJ4g5/IO2C5rzCVxBhRdjuBJ6tVyOQCbBcTw
74ikoxw59JVqBQSB0VBYAjs=
=prlO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l

ADORE821 (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


PRIME DIRECTIVE RESUME

> What's a prime directive resume?

You seem somewhat intelligent, but really when you enter a new
group, you should take the time to find out who the players are, and
what their views are, before you start swinging your sword.

Anyhow, I will give you the benefit of the doubt, and answer your
question at face value, even though you should be able to figure it out
for yourself.

And in particular if you have ever run the Vital Information Rundown
in the Church, you would be very clear on this subject.

When people were admitted to the secret pythagorean society, they
had to present a new and original proof of pythagoras's theorem. It can
be proved a hundred billion different ways, so the demand was not all
that unreasonable.

For the super power society, they demand a prime directive writeup,
concerning the subjects of demonstration, use and deployment of super
powers. And they need to know you will live by it.

The term is of course stolen from star trek, where it meant not to
interfere with the societies of more primitive people. In other words
don't use your advanced scientific powers to overwhelm them by solving
all their problems for them, or in some cases even let them know you
exist and are watching.

In this case, its more simple, namely the security around research
into super powers because some people will have a very negative reaction
to you having such powers, particularly powers that can be considered
weapons of war.

Who do you trust learning them from, practicing them with,
demonstrating them to etc.

What do you use them for and when?

Many think there should be no such directive, but those that are
working on the powers would not trust such a being into their group. So
it really is a matter of trust.

In the military its called top secret clearance.

In pythag's time if you leaked to the public that the square root of
2 was not rational, they would take you out to the lake and drown you.
Could be legend...

So in your resume, it would be required to present a comprehensive
writeup delineating the kinds of super powers there could be, how they
could be used, and what kind of security should be placed around their
development, practice, demonstration, use and deployment, in order to
protect yourself and your loved ones and the broad public masses from
harm, not only from the use of the powers directly, but also from the
reactives that populate the world finding out about it.

Second, but not part of the prime directive, would be a write up
detailing your own personal failures to live up to your own prime
directives and how that resulted in the loss or diminuation of your
existing super powers, in particular how it got you involved in taking
care of bodies.

Homer

- --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Fri Nov 26 13:30:33 EST 2010

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Wed Sep 25 12:00:03 EDT 2019
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore821.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFdi48EURT1lqxE3HERAlNUAJwPOxbIky4epOhH0ZyWvNtrNSpy+ACfa3uw
TcpvwXeEh4OcK+/NKnalxkE=
=AJqy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l

ADORE985 (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


THE MECHANISMS OF LEARNING

> 1- There is me. I just know it.

No, we LEARN by looking. We see and we conclude.

We can also continuously reverify over and over again.

The problem is in the mechanism of that learning.

In the physical universe we are learning by looking at effects of
distant causes. We never see the cause, only the messenger of the
cause.

We never see the King, and can't see the King, only the messenger,
and the King that originated the message is long gone by the time the
messenger reaches us.

In the conscious universe we are learning by looking directly at
the cause, we can SEE the cause causing us to learn that something is
there.

The experiences of red and green and blue are AGENT and we know
that because we can SEE THEIR AGENCY directly. There is no messenger
between them and us, and we can see that too.

For certain.

We can only be certain of the King when there is no messenger at
all, zero mission visuals.

Does cause exsit at all?

How do we know. Observe the process of learning the answer to that
question. See what you come up with.

A machine can not see cause nor prove there is any.

> 2- I am bombarded by signals telling me that there is a whole lot of other
> stuff.
>
> I am certain about # 1. I do not see a way to get certainty about # 2.

Again be clear, the stuff we actually see is certain, but these
experiences of color form are being used to REPRESENT the existence of
something external to us which we can not see directly. That is a
choice of OURS to use them that way.

In a dream we know there is no external actuality, in the waking
state we CHOOSE to assume there is.

Put two pieces of red and blue paper in front of you, and observe
the conscious experience of red and blue which is certain.

But how do we know THE PAPER is out there in the physical universe?
We don't and can't.

There may or may not be external referents to the conscious
renditions we can see, but there is a game to be played with these
experiences which is survival.

That game pressures us into playing the game with pain and
pleasure, and pressures us to try to explain WHY pain and pleasure are
caused by the things that do, but its a virtaul world we live in, the
external actuality just simply isn't there at all, and thus our waking
state becomes just another dream.

It has causal rules that even if arbitrary are momentarily binding
while we are in the dream, particularly if we do not understand it is a
dream (non lucid), but it opens the possibility that we can understand
how the dream was created BY CONSCIOUSNESS and what hand OUR
consciousness may have had in creating it and joining it.

> Any reasoning that tries to prove that there can be only one explanation for
> our mutually perceived universe may be logically sound, but does not
> resonate with me; it may be a valid intellectual construct, but simply not
> pertinent.

We can't prove, we can only support with evidence.

One trip out of wer body and it becomes clear that at a minimum
each person lives in their own private idaho virtualization that seems
to co resonate with other's similar dreams.

There is no evidence for the external physical universe at all.

> The construct, by the way, is cool, and I am proud of you. Really. But I
> believe (believe?!) that the nature of reality is different, unknown and
> perhaps not amenable to analysis that can be put into words. In other words,
> as Bill might say, the answer is wordless. And thoughtless.

The answer to what question?

The question before the court is a simple and exact question:

Does actual space and time exist as it is represented to us in our
conscious renditions of it, or are we dreaming of space and time where
there is none?

If there is no space or time out there just conscious experiences
of them, then who or what is cause if cause is not out there, and if we
are not made of outthere, a physical body.

And if there WERE external space and time, how could we ever prove
it? Or even support it?

And if we can prove that we can never prove it, why surmise it?

Quantum Mechanics long ago gave up surmising about things that
can't be measured.

Clearly something exists other than us, the question is what is its
true nature, matter, energy, space and time, or consciousness?

> What I hope for is that there we are more than just coal, water and air,
> that there is indeed a mystery, and that we will one "day" know it.

OK, the second question before the court, simple as pie is as
follow:

We DEFINE a machine as any system of parts interacting with each
other via cause and effect across a spacetime distance.

Qustion: Can this machine learn with perfect certainty anything?

That it exits? That matter, energy, space or time exist?

That it is receiving two different frequencies of light, that we
might call red and green or blue but it calls 700nm?

Simple question, any information theory professional will tell you
conclusively, no.

A machine can't verify any causal pathway or any parqt of
itself no matter how many video cameras it has trained on itself.

A can say 'I exist!' and be right, but it can't LEARN that it
exists with perfect certainties, and thus verify or KNOW that it is right.

That's because a machine that learns only via causal pathways can't
use causal pathways to verify any of the causal pathways it is using to
learn with or about.

Since consciouness can SEE the causal pathway directly between
its experience of two different colors and its conclusion that
there are in fact two different colors there, and reverify with the
same answer until the cows come home, it is clear that a conscious
unit is not a machine using causal pathways to learn about itself.

Note, conscious learning IS a cauasl pathway, but the conscious
unit is not USING results of the causal pathway to learn with or
compuate back to cause from the final effect it sees.

In the machine, cause and effect are two different events,
at two different times, and the cause is gone by the time the
effect happens. Thus the machine computes back to the theoretical
nature of that cause from what it sees in the effect.

The machine is thus 'learning' about the cause by looking
at the effect.

In the conscious unit, cause and effect are one and the same even
in a single moment of time and space. There is no distance in time or
space between them. The conscious unit does see the effect and compute
back to the cause under trhe assumption if there is an effect there must
be a cause, the conscious unit looks at the CAUSE directly and sees IT
CAUSING the EFFECT, thus the conscious unit not only is certain of the
cause directly but also that the cause caused the effect the machine
also sees with perfect certainty.

This is self luminousness or zero emission learning.

Zero emission learning is messenger free learning.

Zero emission learning is not a space time process because there is
no space or time between cause and effect, if there were, the cause
would be gone by the time the effect got there, and the machine would
have only the effect to look at and a gone cause to surmise about.

Thus a machine is forever blind to cause, while a conscious unit,
well all a conscious unit ever sees is agent colorform.

This also comes back to the universal and existential statement
problem.

Any universal statement can be disproven but not proven.

Universal: All daisies are black.

This can never be shown to be true, but can be shown false, by
presenting one white daisy.

Existential: There exists at least one white daisey.

This can never be shown to be false, but can be shown to be true.
Again one white daisy will do it.

The statement "There exists an independent objective physical
universe independent of our conscious experience" is an existential
statement.

It is easy to prove.

Show me one.

Lastly remember we all have an addiction to mysteries, without them
people think life wouldn't be worth living, for the seeeking, searching,
trying to find, looking for and discovery function of the mind would
grind to a halt.

So its fine if there are mysteries and unknowables, we are not
dealing with them, we are dealing with perfect certainies, things we can
know and that's it.

Except for the one little problem of memory of past lives, if we
have CHOSEN for forget them intentionally, then there are many questions
that need to be answered, why, how, when, and what should we do about
it?

Do we have amnesia?

Is our amnesia benign?

Did we choose to forget, and choose to forget the choice to forget?

Motivation please...

An approach to undoing the choice to forget would also
be useful.

Thus these issues have astounding ramifications and are sloughed
off and "Oh Posh!"ed only by fools.

Homer
Sun Nov 8 19:32:31 EST 2015

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Mon Sep 23 12:00:03 EDT 2019
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore985.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFdiOwEURT1lqxE3HERAgIAAKDU/jJIjieS1cgvwKnn/4JSa5qj6QCghEJi
imhdMtzvzrk8Nj4xUcOjm/g=
=Hb5K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l

ADORE249 (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

OFFEND - DEFEND

Homer:
> Maybe Christians want people to 'turn the other cheek'
>because the Christians want to continue with their wars of conversion against
>the others without having them complain or fight back.

I hate Christians WAY too much :)

For the record, ridging against others who would destroy one's
creations, is refusing to take responsibility for them being in your
dream.

We are taught that life is precious, in particular our wives and
children and neighbors and friends are precious, so we are perhaps
willing to turn the cheek when the villans slap us, but not when he
slaps them.

This gets us deeper into the soup, as each overt/motivator pair
continue to make things more and more solid, more and more dangerous.

People can't conceive of wasting themselves or their friends and
truely becoming free as an OT who has nothing left to lose because he
can simply recreate it, or could care less about it.

So we hold onto our posessions and loved one's and then DEFEND them
against those that would OFFEND against them.

DEFEND - OFFEND makes up one of THE major dicoms that keeps
space/time going and solid.

If you try to go OT and lose the defend/offend dramatization,
people will try to crucify you. They don't want people hanging around
who don't care or who can be both the villan and the victim at the same
time and find it beautiful and a good story etc.

Many people are trying to go clear and OT in order to be MORE ABLE
to defend against the offenders, but they are just tying themselves to a
stone.

Running the DEFEND/OFFEND dichotomy goes a long ways towards
getting to OT.

Even an OT CAN DEFEND himself, but its more on the order of
disengaging the offender from his dream rather than taking aim at
actions or identities the being is mocking up in his dream.

Homer

- --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Thu Sep 19 12:00:04 EDT 2019
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore249.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFdg6YFURT1lqxE3HERAsqgAJ9PTaYvWGM9nt2/O/FFLj7xtjb9FACfSv4t
6lqJmXSSG93e4D2cSsB4o5M=
=aXtu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l

ADORE571 (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


LOGIC AND PERFECT CERTAINTY

Logic *IS* a description of the nature of *IS*.

IS is IS.
IS isnot ISNOT.
ISNOT is ISNOT.
ISNOT isnot IS.

IS is a description of the nature of consciousness.

Conscoiusness is perfect certainty of itself and its own IS.

Thus logic, being a description of the perfect certainty of IS, is
perfectly certain.

The fact that non well formed statements can be made in logic whose
truth values are undecidable, does not in any way invalidate the perfect
certainty of those well formed statements in logic whose truth values are
decidable.

Godel jail is reserved for those who try to make philosophies
out of self contradicting or otherwise undecidable statements.

True or false?

"There are no absolutes."

"All generalizations are false."

"Logic is illogical."

"Logic can prove that logic is unprovable or wrong."

"You can't prove anything."

"This statement is true."

"This statement is false."

"This statement is uncertain."

"This statement is undecidable."

"Is the class of all classes that are not members of themselves,
a member of itself?"

"Is the class of all classes that ARE members of themselves, a member
of itself?"

"IS is ISNOT."

"ISNOT is IS."

"Any statment that uses the word IS, is wrong."

"Gradient scale logic *IS* more true than bi valued logic."

"Certainty is certainly impossible".

"I am uncertain if I am uncertain!"

"I dont know if I am certain or not."

"I doubt that I doubt."

Homer

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Thu Feb 28 00:31:34 EST 2008

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sat Sep 14 12:00:04 EDT 2019
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore571.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFdfQ6FURT1lqxE3HERAo+RAKCioIIB9JU0ASLAH72jdCEiy/azWgCeM4gE
S5tWTcJs0xVIevGobpQ1TpA=
=K/av
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l

PROOF30 (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


SYMBOL AND REFERENT

The relation between symbols and referents is important.

A symbol is an object that is used to refer to a referent.

A referent is an object that is refered to by a symbol.

Words, pictures, sounds, anything that is itself an actual object
which is then used to refer to another object is being used as a symbol.

For example there are a new class of airplanes that don't have any
windows for the pilots to see out of them, instead data from the outside
is taken in through cameras and converted to high resolution surround
sound plasma displays in the cockpit.

Thus as the plane flys over a city, the pilot doesn't see the city,
he sees a picture of the city on the plasma display.

The picture of the city is a symbol for the actual city, it carries
data, information and signficance of importance to the pilot about the
actual city below.

Once the pilot gets used to this arrangement he can become very
comfortable considering that the display on the plasma screen IS the
city.

If the display is very good, the illusion that the pilot is looking
through clear glass can be very powerful.

He will point at the display and say "Oh there is the Empire State
Building!"

In his mind the symbol has BECOME the referent.

That is called collapsing symbol and referent.

He forgets he is seeing a symbol for the Empire State Building
rather than the building itself.

Facility with this illusion allows the pilot to concentrate on
flying the plane and not spend mental time translating the symbols he
sees into what is actually on the ground.

However the pilot at no time actually BELIEVES that the display he
sees is in fact the actual city, he knows it is a good illusion born of
making the symbols match the referent with hi fidelity.

In fact the symbols themselves will have qualities and artifacts
that clearly do not belong to the actual city, so once in a while the
pilot will be annoyed by 'flicker' in the picture, which clearly is a
quality of the symbol display and not the city itself.

After a while the pilot can 'filter out' these differences between
symbol and referent and go back to a smooth operating illusion that the
symbol IS the referent.

The fact that the symbols have qualities that the referent does not
is in fact PROOF that the symbol and the referent are two different
objects. Should anyone have any doubt that is. :)

"If A and B are two objects, and A changes but B doesn't, then A
and B are two DIFFERENT objects" - Adorian catechism

Now say someone were to look through the symbol display and become
completely convinced that they were looking through clear glass at the
actual city. Their belief would of course be false, no two ways about
it. Their REALITY is they are looking at the city, the ACTUALITY is
they are looking at a symbol of the city.

Such a person would have fallen into delusion about the illusion,
he no longer believed it WAS an illusion made in symbols, and that then
is his delusion.

When a person believes with complete false conviction that the
symbol is the referent, then we say he is lost in delusion about
illusion.

Notice conviction is not a perfect certainty, conviction is a
theory that one convinces one's self is a perfect certainty for reasons
of vanity.

Now one of the advantages to these cockpits, is pilots can be
trained in similar models on the ground. Again they are surrounded by
high resolution plasma displays, but this time, rather than being
connected by causality to real time cameras bringing in data about the
scenery in the physical universe via photons, they are connected to
video recordings made earlier.

Thus the pilot can practice landing at Kennedy Aiport in New York,
without ever leaving Ottowa Training School.

The cool thing about this arrangement is that the pilot in training
can view the exact same scenery as the actual pilot in the same plane.
Each will say "Oh look at the Empire State building!".

In the actual plane case the symbol on the display screen is
connected in real time to the referent down below, but in the training
case, the symbols are connected to a recording or even a computer
artist's photographic rendition.

It is interesting to note that if the symbol display is really
good, neither pilot can tell if they are in the actual plane or the
trainer! At that point all they have is the symbol display, which looks
identical to both of them as they come in for a landing, and whether the
referent exists or not is irrelevant BECAUSE THERE IS NO WAY FOR THEM TO
FIND OUT!

Now the dim witted can argue, yes but if they crash in the trainer
nothing will happen, but if they crash in the actual plane the
consequences will be dire.

This posting has gone over their heads.

The trainer can be built to explode when crashing.

Homer

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Fri Sep 13 12:00:03 EDT 2019
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/proof30.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFde70EURT1lqxE3HERAhlRAKDA73oxuyC1SyMA2UoEvrVInfHeiQCdGe9K
7NV+mOtE174ck4Nvc4pMy2g=
=XDSQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l

AUDITING

AUDITING Revised 8/11/2009

Auditing is a big subject, certainly bigger than this posting.

However the basics of auditing are very simple, not only how to run
a session but what to run.

To audit means to listen, but in this context it means to give a
properly devised command to your preclear (pc), and then listen to his
response. The auditor then acknowledges, and continues with the process
until a suitable win is achieved on the matter.

THE PURPOSE OF AUDITING

Auditing serves a wide range of purposes from enhancing the
auditor's pocketbook, to actually doing something for the preclear.

Bad auditing will do only one.

Good auditing will do both.

That's called fair exchange.

Don't think for a moment that auditing is some kind of free give
away.

If you are going to spend 8 hours a day dealing with another's
arrogance, conceit, hubris, vanity, lies and self deceit, you will
eventually need to be paid for it.

Barf bags after all cost money.

When your preclear finally gets around to telling you what his REAL
lies and deceits are, like when he used to mircowave kittens to see how
many dosages they could stand until he couldn't revive them any more,
and after he did revive them, how many MORE times he could dose and
revive them until they were done for good, you will finally understand
that sometimes the guy who did the crime and is confessing it to you has
more confront than you the auditor will ever have.

And when your preclear finally goes whole track and starts owning
up to what beings have done to BODIES for the past zillion years, well
it's time to triple your rate so you can afford a stomach replacement
every now and them.

ITEMS

A preclear is dramatizing item pairs.

For example,

Love - Hate
Beauty - Ugly
Good - Evil
Hope - Despair
Fear - Numb

There are MILLIONS of these, and your preclear will be bogged down
in most of them. Not all of them need to be run, just his particular
core group. But you may need to run many surface item pairs until core
pairs come to the surface. Once the core pairs run, the whole mess just
blows up and leaves the preclear free to be himself again, free from
dramatization.

He is also dramatizing NOT-ISNESS on these item pairs, meaning he
has covered them in black mental mass, THEN made invisible, never to be
thought of again.

AS-ISNESS, ALTER-ISNESS, IS-NESS and NOT-ISNESS

Beings start off in native state, the Big Snooze, total
unmanifestation. This is called Basic Truth, or just simply Truth.

It IS what IS.

When you wake up out of the Big Snooze and create or mockup
something, that's an As-Isness, the thing is also what is, simply as it
is. When you take your attention off of it, it vanishes, thus we call
this a vanishing truth.

However after you have created something, and you then assign
significances to it, or alter your view of who created it or why, you
have Alter-Ised the As-Isness to create an Is-ness. Is-ness persists
because when the being tries to take his attention off of it, the thing
he thinks he is trying to take his attention off of isn't actually the
original thing that he created, so he fails.

Thus his attention becomes 'stuck' on the creation and persistence
becomes compulsory.

Thus As-Isness + Alter-Is produces IS-NESS, which we call a
persisting Truth.

If the being gets desperate to get rid of the creation, but can't
remember how to As-Is it into vanishment, he will NOT-IS the creation
into an apparancy of vanishment. But really it is just the IS-NESS
covered in black mental mass that looks like nothing there, but is
really very much something there that can then affect him later THROUGH
the blackness when he isn't looking.

We call a NOT-ISness a persisting Lie.

It is a persisting IS-NESS that looks like nothing there.

Thus we have:

Native State Basic Truth Unmanifestation
As-Isness Vanishing Truth Manifestation
Alter-Is Added significance Manifestation
Is-ness Persisting Truth Manifestation
Not-Isness Persisting Lie Apparent unmanifestation.

The purpose of auditing then is to get the preclear to contact all
Not-isness on his case, recover it back to a state of Is-ness, strip the
Alter-Is off of it, returning it to a pristine As-Isness, and then get
the preclear to take his attention off of it to vanish it properly.

Not-Isness sinks a being with continuous added mental mass. That's
all the crap you feel in your body and your face that get's in the way
of you doing anything with joy.

As-Isness floats a being with continuous vanishing mental mass.

The less mental mass a being is carrying around with him, the more
facile his ability to operate and enjoy it will be.

NEW PRECLEARS

Take the item pair DETEST - ADORE.

Pc's will come into session going:

"I detest, I detest, I detest, grrr, I detest..."

Auditor: Thank you for telling me that.
Auditor: Spot NO detest.

PC: yak yak,

Auditor: OK!
Auditor: Spot SOME detest.

PC: grrr, yak, grumble, kill, grrr, yak grumble kill....

Auditor: OK!
Auditor: Spot NO adore.

PC: "Oh phooey, adoration is for sissies!"

Auditor: OK!
Auditor: Spot SOME adore.

PC: "Er well, uh, I don't know, let's see, I adore detesting!"

Auditor: OK!
Auditor: Spot NO detest.

Run around and around to major win.

Thus a full session on an item pair includes both the NO and SOME
modifier on both the item and it's opposite.

"Spot NO detest"
"Spot SOME detest"
"Spot NO adore"
"Spot SOME adore"

Then start at the top again.

The reason we run the NO item is because if the pc is complaining
mightily about detesting things, you can be sure there is a whole mess
of detestation that he no longer knows about because he has not-ised it
out of existence. It is this charge which is driving him batty and
which runs and ruins his life for him.

In other words the destestation he is conscious of is just a
fumarole for a volcano of detestation that he long ago suppressed and
lost track of. Once the volcano blows it's lid, erupts and is gone, the
fumarole-ing stops.

The pc can now detest freely without being MADE to detest.

He can and will get mad, but he can't be MADE mad, he can't be
provoked. Pushing someone's buttons to get them dramatizing some upset
or another is simply kicking their volcanoes that they don't know are
there so they will blow off some steam through their many fumaroles.

When the volcano is gone, there is nothing left to kick, so you
can't push the being's buttons any more, as there aren't any.

But this is more than the pc being immune to other's attempts to
taunt him, LIFE can't bring him down either any more.

Depression is just one super yellowstone volcano waiting to blow
with fumaroles blowing off with every breath he takes.

The pc has also fallen away from the positive side of the item pair
through the same mechanism of not-isness, force and mental mass covering
free feeling.

Thus when you first ask him what he adores, he can't tell you. But
if you keep running the process, as the detestation volcano starts to
erupt and blow free, the adore volcano will also.

When you see the auditing room lit with alternating detestation and
adoration, you will know you are getting there.

The end result is a preclear who is no longer not-ising detestation
nor adoration, and thus can freely create both at will. He can handle
them, rather than the item pair handling him every time something
restimulates him (kicks his volcano).

Thus the End Phenomenon of any session on any item pair is freedom
from and facility to operate that item pair.

In other words if he detests or adores something, it is because he
is choosing to do so, and not because this subterranean mountain of
charge he no longer knows about is making him do so.

ITEM OPPOSITES

Now whether the opposite of To Detest is To Adore, I have no idea,
Adore thinks so, but Adore is biased :)

The opposite of Adore might be to Abhor for example.

(Adore is "A Divine Operating Religion of Excellence" at adore.com)

So you have to let your preclear choose his own opposites, and
certainly never force pairs down his throat that he doesn't agree with,
or is not interested in running.

Usually the pc will say "I detest, I detest, etc..." and you say
"Ok, great, can you tell me what you would consider the opposite of To
Detest to be?"

Your pc may list a few items, write them all down, but then he will
give you the best fit. If it is To Adore, then fine, if not, run what
he gives you.

If the item he first originates in session is adore, then find it's
opposite instead.

What is the opposite of To Adore? To Detest? To Deplore? To
Abhor?

Who cares, take what he gives you, To Banana, and run it.

NEVER tell your preclear or even suggest what the opposite might
be.

And never tell your preclear what items he needs to run.

There is a whole dumping ground in hell for the heads of people who
do this to each other. Auditing, and the rules of auditing are a way of
life, if life is making you sick it is because everyone around is
breaking the rules of auditing and so no auditing or worse, reverse
auditing, is taking place.

Reverse auditing is used to destroy people, if you know how to
help, you know how to harm. Reverse auditing is doing the opposite of
everything mentioned in this paper.

Remember always the rules of the auditor/pc relationship.

The auditor knows the general, but does not know the specific.

The preclear knows the specific, but hasn't a clue what it is
because he has not-ised it, made nothing of it, and nailed it out of
existence and chernobyled it blackness and invisibility.

(To chernobyl, to bury a radioactive mass in concrete.)

Thus it is your job as the auditor to remind the preclear that he
is dramatizing item pairs, and then get the preclear to find them and
tell you what they are. Once the preclear can operate them again
freely, he is free of them, and free to be or not be them any time he
wants.

HOW TO RUN A SESSION

I trust you all know how to run a session

We call this the "What's up Doc?" rundown.

Auditor: "What's up doc?"
PC: GOD I HATE MY MOTHER.

Auditor: OK, tell me about that.
PC: yak, yak, spit, vituperate, cough gag, spit.
Auditor: OK, I got that.

Auditor: Now can you tell me what you might consider
to be the opposite of hate?
PC: Love
Auditor: Thank you.

Auditor: OK, so we are going to run HATE AND LOVE, that ok?
PC: Grrr, sure, smiling...
Auditor: Great!

Auditor: Spot NO hate.
PC: yak yak
Auditor: Thank you

Auditor: Spot SOME hate.
PC: yak yak
Auditor; thank you

Auditor: Spot NO love.
PC: yak yak
Auditor: Thank you

Auditor: Spot SOME love.
PC: yak yak
Auditor: thank you

Use Spot, Tell me about, Get the idea of, or Conceive.

Then back to the first command. Run to a good win, may take 5
minutes, may take 30 hours.

Item is run to standard End Phenomenon of any item:

Facility with operating and not operating the item pair.

Spot NO operation.
Spot SOME operation.
Spot NO crush.
Spot SOME crush.

Facility with operation and non operation in general, is a major
win and goal of your preclear.

WHAT ITEMS TO RUN

Generally, if you don't evaluate for your preclear, he will start
spilling items from the moment he starts talking, if you have him in
session.

In session means interested in his own case, and willing to talk to
the auditor.

He has hundreds of years of things he wanted to say to SOMEONE that
he never said, you ask him 'Whats up Doc?' in a way that he thinks you
might mean it, and YOU will get the deluge.

As long as you shut up and don't REACT with garbage in return.

People don't tell you their problems because they want YOU to give
them solutions, get it?

In session also means the goofball auditor gives the commands and
the preclear gives the answers, not the other way around.

The reason is if you allow the preclear to give the commands and
the auditor to give the answers, then the auditor is in session and not
the preclear!

Most of his initial items will be low tone items, for example
anger, fear, sorrow and apathy, and yes he has to run low tone items in
order to get better. But he will actually get better while running the
higher tone opposites. Running the low tone item frees up the ability
to run the higher tone opposite, and visa versa.

Thus both sides need to be run.

When spotting items, your preclear needs to be able to spot them
both in himself, and in others, and in disembodied beings, demons,
deities and gods if he can, even if he thinks they are all imaginary.

That monster under his bed as a kid sure has a lot of detest and
adore suppressed on it.

Not to mention despair and courage.

If he can't spot an item in himself or anyone else, have him simply
IMAGINE the item in himself or another. Doesn't matter if it is true or
not. Eventually the true item will show up.

Get the idea of someone not adoring.
Get the idea of someone adoring.

Get the idea of someone not detesting.
Get the idea of someone detesting.

The nice thing about these commands, is he can get the idea
something or someone is adoring that actually never has adored anything!
That changes things for him, as he gets to rewrite existence.

Auditor: Get the idea of your mother adoring you.
PC: No way, never happened, grr, kill, chop, flush, puke spit...
Auditor: I got that.

Auditor: But let's try to get the idea anyhow.
PC: Oh Jesus, ok, well... Wow...
Auditor: Thank you.

Notice get the idea of MOTHERS adoring you, might be more
productive than get the idea of YOUR mother adoring you, but he has to
change HIS conception of HIS mother if he is ever to get better, and he
has to change HIS conception of HIMSELF AS A MOTHER who never adored
anything except for a price.

Changing people and things and time is all his case is about, so
getting him to mock it up not changed and then changed, and then
not changed, and then changed, frees up his feelings on the matter
regardless of the thing's present state.

If he can FEEL that his mother adores him, it WILL change her too,
as she is part of his karma group which is held tightly together only by
people's causal conceptions of each other in it.

So some preclear just can't spot hopelessness on anything or
anyone, have him PRETEND his dog is hopeless, then some guy on the
street, then some building etc.

On the other hand if the process is running just fine without being
creative about it, and your preclear just can't spot something once in a
while, don't force it with pretense, just acknowledge and go on with the
next command. Running the positive will open up the negative, and
running the negative will open up the positive.

But if your preclear just can't spot, can't spot, can't spot, can't
spot for 8 or 16 commands, get him into creative pretense, he will find
it entertaining and winning as it puts him at cause over his own
feelings.

But only as long as it is really his item, that he is interested
in, as evidenced by HIS OWN ORIGINATION OF IT IN THE FIRST PLACE. If it
is an item someone else gave him, or God save your sorry ass, that you
gave him, then drop it immediately, and get him into what HE is
interested in and willing to talk to the auditor about. You see that
means HE is in session, and not you or someone else.

Running someone else's items is an auditing High Crime.

WHAT NOT TO RUN

Questions.

Questions are fine for scientifically dealing with the physical
universe through a body, but questions are death on wheels to a preclear
trying to clear up his own space of hidden volcanoes.

Spot NO question.
Spot SOME question.

Spot NO answer.
Spot SOME answer.

Primary questions are:

Who?
How?
What?
Where?
When?
Why?
Which?
How long, far?
Is it?
Does it?
Plus a billion more.

You can stop compulsive question asking by spotting questions and
answers as above, or by spotting the subjects of questions.

Spot NO who.
Spot SOME who. (Spot a who.)

This may get at hidden terminals, people he has forgotten
COMPLETELY about, real fast.

Run on all of the above question subjects.

For example,

Spot NO when.
Spot SOME when.

This will start to open up his time track, as the time track is
simply a recording of all the wheres and whens the pc has traveled
through and then poured a lot of NO over. It also contains all the whos
he has ever known :)

Eventually he will stop spotting wheres and whens in his memory,
and start to spot them in actual space and time. If you are worried
about direct telepathic penetration of space time, past, present and
future, don't run this process.

A particularly bad question is AM I?

Yes you am.

Get the idea you do not exist.
Get the idea you exist.

For example lots of people are walking around asking themseleves

AM I A SPIRIT?
AM I A BODY?

You run spirit like any item pair, first find its opposite, say
it's NOT-SPIRIT.

Spot NO SPIRIT
Spot SOME SPIRIT
Spot NO NOT-SPIRIT
Spot SOME NOT-SPIRIT

The grammar of some of these commands may stretch the imagination
of both yourself and your preclear, so word clearing each command is
important, and of course you are free to reword them any way that feels
comfortable, as long as it isn't a question.

SPIRIT means anything that is a caring self luminous conscious unit
that is capable of giving a damn. Yes cats and dogs give a damn, and so
does every other living thing in existence.

NO SPIRIT means either the true or false (pretended) absence of
spirit. Pretended absence of spirit results from NOT-ISing his own and
other's spirits since he was born, "Hey spirits are for drinking! Hic!"

NOT-SPIRIT means anything that isn't spirit, namely illusions of
matter, energy, space, time and force.

NO NOT-SPIRIT means either the true or false absence of things
which are not spirit.

This distinction between NO and NOT is critical to running these
processes.

If your preclear has a NO diamond, then actually he probably does
have a diamond but doesn't know it, as it is covered in black mental
mass. He needs to recover the diamond to go free.

If your preclear has a NOT diamond, then he doesn't have a diamond
at all, he has piece of coal.

If your preclear has a NO NOT diamond, then he has covered the coal
in black mass too.

When spotting NO diamond, you DO NOT want him to try to spot the
diamond under the NO because it ain't there yet, you want him to spot
the NO on top of the diamond. This as-ises the NO on top of the
diamond, allowing the diamond itself to finally surface.

You might ask, well if your preclear can't see the diamond because
it is covered by NO, how do you know there is a diamond there in the
first place.

Trust me, if your preclear is all up in arms about ITEM, there HAS
to be NO ITEM there also, fumaroles don't exist without volcanoes to
power them. And there will also be his opposite item and NO opposite
item, BUT ONLY IF YOU ALLOW HIM TO TELL YOU WHAT THE OPPOSITE IS.

If you try to run a NO ITEM on an item the preclear doesn't have he
will get worse.

The purpose of the process is to blow off the NO, and leave the
ITEM and NOT ITEM free for the pc's use.

In the case of adore and detest, NOT ADORE = DETEST.

Some item pairs come in the form of ITEM and OPPOSITE ITEM as
adore and detest do.

Spot NO detest
Spot SOME detest
Spot NO adore
Spot SOME adore

Other's come in the form of ITEM and ITEM NOT, such as WANT and
WANT NOT.

Spot NO wanting not sex.
Spot SOME wanting not sex.
Spot NO wanting sex.
Spot SOME wanting sex.

Yet other's come in the form of ITEM and ANTI ITEM such as
disestablishmentarianism and antidisestablishmentarianism.

Spot NO disestablishmentarianism
Spot SOME disestablishmentarianism
Spot NO antidisestablishmentarianism
Spot SOME antidisestablishmentarianism

That's a joke, you figure it out.

It is up to your preclear to tell you which kind of opposite it is,
for any particular item.

The volcanoes you are trying to uncover consist of the false or
pretended non existence of the item pair. For each item pair there are
two volcanoes, both of which are capped into non existence except for
the fumaroles that blow steam when your preclear is all steamed up.

They also RUN your preclear like a steam engine, making him go and
do, feel and think things all day long not under his long term control.

When he tries to stop and chill, the steam starts to cook him.

Running the NO command gets the preclear to spot the false non
existence of these mountains of charge until they become evident, blow
off and then become a true non existence of charge.

A PRETENDED NO ITEM will read as a stop followed by a fall or dirty
needle on the meter, that's the NO blowing off the ITEM which in fact is
there.

A TRUE NO ITEM will read as an F/N.

Thus when ever you find your preclear grinding away in a question
about something, just extract the item pairs from the question and run
spotting on them until the whole thing is a non event.

Running the items will answer some questions for the preclear but
not all. Some questions are just too stupid and shouldn't be asked at
all. Many questions don't HAVE answers the way your preclear thinks
they should. Other questions are their own answer, they are called self
answering questions, the question IS the answer.

"What am I doing wrong?"

Asking that question!

Run the god damn item pairs.

That might be WRONG AND RIGHT.

Even running,

"What is right?"
"What is wrong?"

is better than "What am I doing wrong?" but it's still a pair of
questions, rather than pure items.

Better to run,

Spot NO wrong.
Spot SOME wrong.
Spot NO right.
Spot SOME right.

Spiritual question asking is psychosis.

The being KNOWS, what the hell is he doing wondering or asking
questions?

Spot NO wondering.
Spot SOME wondering.

Yes the pretended goofballism is fair chosen, so just run it out,
and he will recreate it all over again later in a more optimum game for
a while if he wants to.

Auditing is basically game cleanup.

PROBLEMS

Your preclear will be found to be stuck in vibrating problems, with
HIMSELF.

A problem is two active desires diametricaly opposed to each other
on exactly the same subject.

He wants and he doesn't want the same thing at the same time.

By doesn't want we mean WANTS NOT.

HE WANTS TO KISS THE GIRL AND HE WANTS NOT TO KISS THE GIRL.

Break it down into the item and its opposite and run as above.

The problem will come apart.

Notice a problem doesn't mean that he wants to create A but doesn't
want to create B.

A problem means he wants to create A *AND* he doesn't want to
create A.

If his mother drives him batty chances are he wants to destroy his
mother *AND* he wants not to destroy his mother.

That's a problem you see and will tend to taint his relationship
with his mother.

The AND causes a vibration between the two actions, and while in
destroy mode he will commit overts which he will regret when in the not
destroy mode, then he will regret his kindness when back in the destroy
side. And he is doing this a few hundred times a minute.

For his whole life, across a whole track of many interspersed
lives.

It forms a painful twisting snake in his spine and face that he
can't shake because HE IS IT.

He is shifting self images so fast they look like one confused
mass, 'I am a destroyer of mothers', 'I am a lover of mothers.'

Spot NO DESIRE TO MURDER
Spot SOME DESIRE TO MURDER
Spot NO DESIRE TO NOT MURDER
Spot SOME DESIRE TO NOT MURDER

There is a hell containing trillions of beings packed together in
the dark, all trying to murder each other. Since these beings are live
valences, if one comes into restimulation, the impulse to murder will be
strong, and natural regrets will cause a restraint, thus giving the
preclear a problem.

The desire to murder and the desire to not murder THE SAME PERSON
AT THE SAME TIME forms a problem, and sinks into oblivion.

Black V's are people who can't mockup anything, because they can't
stop mocking up an AND of magnitude, they have a problem with mockups.

This is NOT a NOTHING there, this is very much a NO SOMETHING
there.

The 5 senses are see, hear, touch, taste and smell.

If your pc can't see anything he tries to mockup, there will be
something he wants to see and not see at the same time.

And it won't be small and insignificant, and it will be a two item
pair.

When his vision turns on, it will be something like he finds
himself surrounded by God and the Devil in a swirling tapestry of demons
and angels.

Go word clear vertigo.

MAJOR DICOMS

SPIRIT - NOT SPIRIT
ADORE - DETEST
DESPAIR - COURAGE
IMPORTANT - NOT IMPORTANT
DETERMINATION - NOT DETERMINATION
RIGHT - WRONG
FUN - NOT FUN
DECENCY - CRIMINALITY
TERRIFIC - HORRIFIC

Courage is an interesting item because it is above enthusiasm which
is the highest tone the body can feel.

The being LOST courage coming into the body, and now being lower
tone than enthusiasm, he can no longer get out of the body. He thinks
he IS a body, and that sinks him.

Thus spotting COURAGE and NO COURAGE and their opposites will go a
long ways towards re exteriorizing the being from his body because his
tone will be higher than his body's tone again for the first time since
birth.

The body has it's own sense of courage, but nothing like the true
courage of an eternal being. The horse in war gets its courage from its
rider.

A being in good shape exterior to his body should be running at
exhilaration, thrill and above. The body is his pet and beloved work
horse. You ride a body like a horse, giving it subtle indications of
what needs to be done. You don't drive its every muscle from inside its
head 24x7 with spurs and whips.

People can exteriorize for all kinds of reasons, mostly near death
shock events. With running courage we are talking about a full self
determined exteriorization that leaves the body breathing and in love
again with the being that rides it.

That's a star high goal by the way, the body wants to kill the
being and the being wants to kill the body, they can't wait to get away
from each other, AND they can't stand the thought of separation.

Neither the body nor the being would know what to do without each
other.

Neither the body nor the being know what to do with each other.

Underlying their hatred for each other is undying love and wanting
to take care of.

Take that problem apart, exteriorize the body and being, and you
are worth your while as an auditor.

Homer

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Wed Jul 29 23:46:05 EDT 2009

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l

ADORE286 (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Zinj (zinjifar@yahoo.com) wrote:
> I suspect that even parchesi is a superior game to rationalizing
> inhumanity to others based on terror of an 'ever dwindling spiral'.

Rationalizing inhumanity to others IS engaging in the dwindling
spiral.

The dwindling spiral consists of the following:

1.) Overt
2.) Regret
3.) Restraint
4.) Justification by using motivators AFTER the overt.
5.) Redramatization of the Overt
6.) Goto 2

"Eventually all become marbles on the thetan plane." - Adore

That's a fact Jack.

Homer

Tue Sep 13 23:17:59 EDT 2005

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sun Sep 8 12:00:04 EDT 2019
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore286.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFddSWFURT1lqxE3HERAhTUAJ4jjUHq2V4vm4Jxi6yKhFGBtbZUEwCeL0dz
iwH2+XKpbY6FsLxqrQMwJqg=
=ARNs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l

SESSIO15.memo

MOTION AND NO MOTION

(In this posting the word NO means absence of, not a pretended
absence of as, in the CDEINR scale. Sorry for the confusion.

However when running the process, NO MOTION means both pretended
and actual NO MOTION.

"Get the idea of NO MOTION."
"Get the idea of SOME MOTION.")

The physical universe consists entirely of games and problems of
motion and no motion with solutions of motion and no motion.

Actually no motion, some motion, too little motion, and too much
motion, and optimum motion.

Nazi's coming over the hill with tanks, that's a problem of motion.
If one runs or fights, that is a solution of motion, if one hides and is
very still while they pass, that is a solution of no motion.

Mother is dead on the bed in a valium stupor. That's a problem of
no motion. Baby is screaming and wailing away trying to wake mother,
that is a solution of motion.

The state of the universe is entirely described by the state of its
motion and no motion.

Goals are an intention to create or rearrange the present state of
motion and no motion in the universe, it is what the being has 'set out
to accomplish'.

In the process of striving to attain a goal, one may run into
states of counter (other's) motion and counter no motion that thwart
one. They provide further problems in motion and no motion that the
being must solve with his own motion and no motion.

Sometimes the being will come up against a counter motion or no
motion that he can not surmount. He has a number of choices at this
point.

1.) He can exteriorize from the universe, rearrange the rules a
bit, reassign power and allocations, in such a way that when he comes
back in on the goal, he can best it.

2.) He can say "Ok this one is too big for me, I will choose to do
something else", make a clean break with the original goal and start a
new one.

3.) He can continue to strive against the barrier like a pit bull
never letting go and never getting anywhere.

4.) He can say "Oh I didn't want this goal anyway, only fools and
stupid people seek such things, its much smarter to do this other thing,
I wasn't ever really interested in that goal anyway." This is pulling a
sour grapes on the original goal resulting in a going off course into a
substitute. This is not the same thing as a clean break because he
still has attention on the original goal.

We know he has attention on the original goal because his SELF
IMAGE is now tainted with resentment and sourness.

In fact not only does he have attention on the original goal, he
has attention on NOT having attention on the original goal, pretending
that he never had attention on the original goal. Thus one finds him a
long time later with 50 percent of his attention on some cute bunny that
scorned him ages ago, and 50 percent of his attention on pretending he
has no attention there. That leaves him squat to run his present life.

Worse when he failed, he made a mark on himself. It made him feel
small, it was a surprise, it killed his pride and put him in an andless
sequence of questions he can't answer about the nature of existence, and
also put him in an incredibility "This can't be happening, but it is!"
He never gets over that indecision, "Did this happen or didn't it? It
COULDN'T have, but it DID!"

That's an incredibility.

It remains an unresolvable maybe to the end of time, and that is
part of why he has so much attention on making sure he doesn't have any
attention on it and pretending that it never happened in the first
place.

The one thing a thetan can not stand is an incredibility.

The anatomy of an incredibility is,

"Certainty that something is true.
Certainty that something is impossible."

Now the guy who made the clean break with the goal, or exteriorized
from the universe and rearranged the rules a bit so he could win,
doesn't get stuck with this charge.

He's the game writer, if his game kicks his butt he thinks "Wow
there is going to be LOTS of money in this game!"

Since he knows he wrote the game, he can feel proud that he lost,
he was sick of winning, too easy, no money in selling games that any 3
year old can win, so now he has a winner game because he is a loser!

So he says "Cool, I can't win here, so let's try something a little
lighter, maybe it will kick my butt too, and I can charge twice as much
for this game when it goes to market."

Do you have any idea how hard it is to write a game that the writer
can not win but is constantly tempted to keep trying?

This is very different than the guy who took the loss personally,
he didn't feel PROUD he lost, he didn't see it as a WIN that he lost, he
just felt like he didn't want to be him any more, and that's the
beginning of the downfall.

Enforced non fair chosen absence of such fun games is the Nightmare
of No Nightmares, not enough Nightmares.

He doesn't want the nightmare even AFTER he knows he wrote it.

"That piece of junk beat me? Christ I must be a real nothing..."

He felt there was something wrong with *HIM* for not being able to
win his own game. He says to himself, "Wait a minute, you mean I am
stuck being a second rate loser for the rest of time?", and all his BT's
in grand orchestrated choral unison go "YES!", and he buys into it, and
that's the end of him, he's a marble rolling around the drain, with his
own tears making sure he is washed down and away from where no one
returns.

No pride, no future, no life.

He has a vision of SELF that is unworthy and unacceptable, and he
begins to lay in the mass and force that you are now trying to audit out
in the preclear in front of you.

You have an INFINITE being that wrote a NEAR INFINITE game, lost
playing against his own creations, through fair chosen self limitation,
and now wants to die because he considers he is 'inferior' and 'unworthy
of being'. Surely there is some humor to be had in here somewhere.

One has to be careful though about the "Nightmare of No
Nightmares", which is the absence of desirable games to lose to.

You find some guy who just can't win any games no matter how much
he tries, well somehow he thinks he's looking at TOTAL doom if he were
to ever get better and able again.

He is afraid of the DOOM OF NO DOOM.

If you are sovereign there are no games, you can have anything, win
any game, just by conceiving of it.

Thus he would rather remain a loser than become a winner, because
every time he wins a game he loses THE GAME, he doesn't have the game
any more. If you win too many games, there become no more games worth
playing.

((That's why Hubbard claimed 'Invent a game' was a one shot clear
process.))

Sovereignty has become a problem to him.

Talk about yuks.

How can sovereignty, "you want it, you got it," be undesirable?

Think about this, this is the core joke, the core sticking point
keeping the being who has made a fair chosen CHOICE to be non sovereign
for a while, in TERROR of becoming sovereign again.

So of course he reaches for freedom with his elbow.

He wants to be free AND not be free at the same time.

That allows him to continue to persist in the space time game
stream, worrying more about the consequences of being free again, than
he is of making progress getting there.

He wants to be FREE FROM, but not FREE TO.

Free to invent games he can lose!

He wants to be free from the apparently non sovereign nightmare of
all these games he is losing to, but he also sees sovereignty as the
source of just more nightmares, possibly worse than the one he is
presently in.

Sovereignty is able to be able, surely, but it is also able to be
unable for a while.

That is what sovereignty does, create whiles of non sovereignty.

But they don't have to be so horrendous that they run on a carrier
wave of chronic anxiety, horror and sorrow.

Thrill with some excitement might be enough.

Thrill comes from wondering if you are doomed forever.

But the guy has a problem with his sovereign self, just a bit too
alien for him to admit that he is IT, and embrace it.

I mean Christ, what was he thinking?

Well he doesn't know, and he doesn't want to know lest he do it
again, freedom to create is the scariest thing there is, especially when
part of your creation is a mix of creating an inability to create.

Which ALL creation is.

Once you create an apple there, you can't create an orange there,
you see? So any creation precludes any other creation in the exact
same spot in space and time.

So you are not going to make TA division 1 beyond the day when he
sees where you are trying to take him.

OT VIII is the ability and WILLIGNESS to become a worm caught
between a rock and a hard place again. An OT VII in other words.

So this all comes from the Static creating a universe of relative
Kinetics. These are the motions and no motions of the masses and
energies in the universe. Nothing is ever absolutely still except for
the static, but there is an optimum motion/no motion balance that
produces the most amount of thrill, excitement, temporary failures, set
backs and 'accomplishment' for those who have set out to create such
things.

Remember thrill is made of win/lose and really and truly not
knowing which one its going to be.

You willing to do that to your self for a while, in which you think
its forever?

Non optimum motion means too much winning or too much losing.

Losing is not an acquired taste, losing is what static does
creates games of losing with chase in the middle.

The game becomes how long you can keep the game going before you
lose THE GAME by winning or losing it.

When the motion and no motion becomes non optimum, the being tries
to restore equilibrium by the creation of his own motion and no motion
to balance and 'solve' the motion and no motion the universe is throwing
at him.

To the degree that he is successful, he will accomplish what he set
out to accomplish, otherwise he will create a fall into the dwindling
spiral of aberration laid out above.

Lies can be a tricky subject. The only truth there is, is the
static, total unmanifestation. Anything created is a kinetic and is
thus a lie. However there is the FIRST lie, the TRUE-LIE of Adore. And
then there are the second and further lies that obscure the first lie
and cause its apparently unrevokable persistence.

"You seek the Grand Spring Phases,
And so shall you find,
For the TRUE-LIES will free you,
To Operate as you kind."

"As you kind" means "As you wish, as you are kind to, etc."

So the truth is the guy sat in the Saddle of Sovereignty AS a
static orientation point, no mass, no meaning and no mobility, and from
there he cast a whole universe of kinetic symbols, all having mass,
meaning and mobility. That includes space and time and all the masses
and energies in it. Notice that time is just another form of motion/no
motion and needs to be audited when you approach this stuff.

Static = Orientation point, something that creates, locates and
orients symbols in space and time.

Kinetic = Symbols that are oriented.

Symbols are made of matter, energy and the force between them which
acts as cause in the kinetic universe.

The static is actual cause over kinetic symbols and the changes
that happen between them.

Symbols pretend to have cause themselves in the form of force, and
can affect other symbols.

Because the body is a symbol, but the being who owns the body is a
static, the being can none the less act independently of the apparent
cause between symbols via force, by exercising true cause himself over
both force and symbols via postulates and considerations originated from
above Serenity of Beingness, tone 40 on the tone scale.

On Earth this rarely happens as beings are very enamored of being
symbols, falling dominos, pushing each other with force.

Space is created with spatial anchor points (a kind of symbol), and
time is created with temporal anchor points (another kind of symbol).

Spatial anchor points are 'out there' and hold space up and
inflated. He needs to have at least 3 to make space with himself as the
4th.

8 spatial anchor points with himself as the 9th in the
middle of the cubes works well.

Temporal anchor points are points 'out then', past or future, which
gives him a sense of past and future. He needs at least 2 to keep time
up and running with himself in the present as the 3rd.

(The guy is walking down the staircase from START OF TIME to
PRESENT TIME, over and over again hundreds of times every second, that's
how he's keeping time going. Start of time is not in the past.

There is no past, time itself is all one big moment of time called
now, but we can change where the hands are pointing on the clock and
claim it is now a new moment of time.

It's the same moment of time, just a different clock setting.

Run "Start some time!" "End some time!" over and over again, see
what happens.)

Spatial anchor points are places of importance and significance.

Temporal anchor points are times of importance and significance,
birthdays, meetings, graduations, executions etc.

The primary times and places of temporal and spatial anchor points
are places of relationship, or relatingness, in particular doing
business with, while engaged in consumption and production aimed toward
survival on any and all kinetic dynamics.

The best kinds of anchor points are people, places and things that
he wants to interact with and relate to. cause points with a comm line
between them, communicating important realities, significances and masses
so produced.

Relate to = exchange of ideas and realities (important things to
know) between two different causal points, on the subject of desires,
experiences, havingness and producingness, namely industry, consumption
and production, according to goals to create and produce that he has on
these matters.

Some anchor points are moving all the time, like his friends, some
are rock solid stationary like his Church alter or whatever.

Some anchor points are movable, but he likes it when they don't
move, like the pianos at Cornell's Sage chapel. He gets real sad when a
piano disappears for a while and he can't play the thing at 3am in the
morning.

A cat is a spatial anchor point.

The litter box is also a spatial anchor point, but cleaning the
litter box is a temporal anchor point.

Temporal anchor points are, many of them, created on the fly on a
day to day basis. They get written in the 'appointment book of life'.

Cat dies, no more appointments with the cat or the litter box.

A friend dies, no more toking up every friday.

You see you aren't just looking forward to friday, but to the
friday next, and then after that, for years and years and years.

With a good friend you can put multiple temporal anchor points
(meetings, interactions, engagement) out there until the end of time,
every one written in your appointment book.

They create a glorious future coming up one by one with all these
created temporal and spatial anchor points you put there.

How DO you feel about your future, anyhow?

The friend turns on you, or disappears, and suddenly the end of
time crashes all the way back to the tip of your nose,

Now, your "looking forward" is to one day at a time, or worse, the
next time you start crying uncontrollably.

Finally he wakes up every morning, "God damn it, I am still alive!"

There is a saying that excess of laughter weeps, and excess of
sorrow laughs.

Nope, not for this guy, the sorrow turns on, and the lights of
laughter fade out to return never more.

He can't say hello any more, just goodbyes and 'I love yous', and
there is no one there to hear them.

All his 'I love yous' go into a trash can especially set there by
him, and the trash is picked up every day by the dump truck.

He chokes back the enormity of his love and the enormity of his
sorrow.

Neither angels nor devils can hear his cry.

He can only survive by belittling both love and sorrow, eventually
making nothing of them.

What the hell is it you think you can't remember anyhow?

Your love and sorrow are deeper than any ocean ever was.

Loss of anchor points through death, departure and reversal leads
to collapsing space and collapsing time.

His life wreck is a rubble heap of prior and future operating
spatial and temporal anchor points and reasons to engage in them,

Life is rich with spatial and temporal anchor points, the more you
have going that you want to relate to, the higher tone you will be.

It's that simple, as long as the space or time anchor points are
not too far away from you or hostile to you.

It is the relating and relate-ability between you and your anchor
points that makes them worthwhile.

Trying to relate to someone on Alpha Centauri, or 2000 years in the
future can be hard.

Life and worthwhile energy comes from TWO WAY FLOW between
two different cause points.

Talking to God is a waste of time unless you can get Him to talk
back to you for real.

Mortal meatballs have it hard, as they believe all their anchor
points are going to die on them one day, and if you have a massive wall
in your future that you can't see beyond, that's an arbitrary end of
temporal anchor points you write in your appointment book that needs to
be audited out.

Thetan's think their appointment book has a last page.

Boy is that sad.

So let's get back to our preclear starting off as an orientation
point, creating spaces and times of symbols.

As an orientation point, once he has all this universe of symbols
set up, or has contracted with someone to do it for him, he chooses to
BECOME one of those symbols (a game player), and assigns "orientation
point" to other symbols in the game bigger than him.

Maybe he assigned his basic orientation point, the thing that
'created him' to God, that's pretty close to the truth, the static. But
he no longer conceives HE IS THAT STATIC, so he is running on a total no
responsibility for being, or being a symbol.

Lower tone he will assign his creator and orientation point to
the space time that holds all his other symbols.

"Space time made me!"

"Without space time I wouldn't exist!"

Lower tone though he will assign his creator and orientation points
to OTHER SYMBOLS already inside the space and time. That's called
introversion, looking inward.

His orientation point is a symbol inside the perimeter of the space
time bubble he conceives is the AllThatIs!

He becomes created and destroyed in his own view by something
finite that he created as the unlimited static.

Notice this action of introversion kind of defines the static out
of existence, its just not part of his "What is" any more.

Anything outside his bubble of space time is not part of his
dynamics or his conception of the cosmic all.

The minute the being writes his personal responsibility and choice
out of the equation for WHY he is here, he is doomed to never leave here
as long as he continues to do so.

Something that is created by something inside the universe of
symbols, clearly can never leave that universe.

So all of this creation stuff is the first lie, the true lie, notice he
can do all this and still retain some awareness that he did it, although
not too much awareness lest he wake up and have to do it all over again.

Its a first lie because now he thinks he is a kinetic rather than a
static.

But then he loses a game, and postulates that this is not something
RIGHT with him and the AllThatIs, but something WRONG with him and the
AllThatIs, something he didn't INTEND or EXPECT or DESIGN. He considers
that Sovereignty is flawed, that he is flawed, and now we can see him
building a citadel of second lies around himself after the first lie of
Perfect Sovereign Creation by himself as a static, of himself as a
kinetic.

The sovereignty of creation is not a lie, WHAT WAS CREATED is a
lie. Remember everything that is created is a rendition in
consciousness that REPRESENTS something, its not the thing itself. God
can not create a tree, he can only create a conscious rendition of a
tree, an avatar or symbol representing an actual tree which can not in
fact ever exist as an actual tree. It is always a picture of tree
rendered in the color TV consciousness of some being.

The day the being curses his original Sovereignty, or doubts it, or
regrets it, or rues it, he's had it, his destiny is to become a marble
rolling around the drain.

So when looking for the incident 'wherein it first all went wrong',
you want the original intended motion and no motion that he had set out
to accomplish, the counter motion and no motion that he ran into, the
various motion and no motion solutions he came up with that didn't work,
and the DOUBT about his own sovereign hand in the matter, and the
LIE-LIE that he accepted that led to his final demise into self
deprecation and substitute.

Most of the inaccessible mass you will find on your pc will be those
areas where his attention is on pretending there is no attention.

"Get the idea of NO attention."
"Get the idea of SOME attention."

Thus when you free one of these up, you will get twice the
attention units back! And there will be bunnies everywhere begging to
be let in.

But earlier than that you have the Saddle of Sovereignty and the
Nightmare of No Nightmares. One handles that by rehabilitating the
ability to create nightmares, the nightmare of no nightmares, and
ludicrous demise at will.

In particular the core choice to not know a choice.

This is a *MAJOR* step not to be belittled, as it produces a God
that is no longer human, as it has recovered its divine sense of humor,
along with his willingness to operate Absolute Fearless Sovereignty.

"Get the idea of absolute fearlessness."
"Get the idea of absolute fear."

"Get the idea: Everything is NOT OK"
"Get the idea: Everything is SOME OK"

Homer

Fri Sep 29 13:56:59 EDT 2017

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l