GOALS PROBLEMS MASSES
Goals create problems when they run into opposition, and problems
of long duration, many lifetimes in some cases, create mental masses
that harm the body and make it difficult to perceive, remember, feel
good and operate.
If an existing problem does not vanish upon inspection, then there
is an earlier one, going back into the recent cluster of past lives that
are related by common goals and their failures, then into previous
clusters of lives/existences/universes on different goals, back to the
first problem.
You do not have to find the first problem to key the whole mess
out, but you do have to find THE thing that is tying you up about life
and creativity in this life. The apparent opposite terminals (people
who are opposing you) are almost assuredly not the real ones, as you
know about them.
Also there are two kinds of problems.
Problems with others, and problems within yourself.
You want to create a park, he wants to create a parking lot.
That's an external problem with others.
You want to create a park AND you want to create a parking lot.
That's an internal problem with yourself. It starts off as an
indecision, which to do, but then ends up in trying to do BOTH at the
same time, and thus total energy is expended towards getting nothing
done, and one's spine and face/sinuses/brain get wrapped up in a knot.
Just locating the mental forces involved will start to release it
even if the underlying "what it was all about" is not yet clear.
Lastly, although specific people are involved in problems, the
actual problem is with WHAT KIND OF people they are being at the time.
Parent and child relationships mess up the 2nd dynamic, but there
are 7 others to get messed up on, self, groups, mankind, animals/plants,
physical universe and the infinite.
Each has conflicts that the being no longer is analytically aware
of, yet they compose most of the pressure in his face and spine.
For example, on the 4th dynamic, mankind, Joe Blow who was a real
asshole during one of my past lives was the apparent focus of the
problem I had with his kind of people, but auditing him specifically
without locating who or what he represented to me, won't work.
I was being a 'subversive' and he was being a 'powerful person',
meaning rich and political etc.
Thus subversives tend to oppose powerful people who control the
police state and status quo and keep people from talking.
My goal as the subversive was to give encryption and anonymity to
the people so they could talk freely to everyone without fear of
reprisal. I didn't want to overthrow the government, I wanted to give
control of it back to the people, so they needed to be able to talk
faster than the government could track them down. I wanted to make the
governement's head spin looking for the source of people's
communications.
Finding such a relationship will release an entire cluster of lives
that were involved in that particular war between subversives and power
brokers.
There is a deeper complication here, as I said lives come in
clusters arranged around some particular Goal such as TO BE SUBVERSIVE
or TO BE POWERFUL.
Prior to any cluster of lives was an earlier cluster of lives that
followed a different goal. The goals in each cluster opposed EACH
OTHER.
So say long ago I was chasing goal A, and I was opposed to people
chasing goal B. During that time I was being A, B drove me nuts, and at
the end I was killing/torturing/damning members of B freely and without
remorse or restraint.
But B won, as the later goal always does.
Finally I gave up on chasing A and BECAME B, I started chasing B, I
became like what had destroyed me as A, namely B, which I had tried to
murder out of existence a last ditch effort to get rid of B.
But now as B, I am being hounded by people who are chasing C!
As the next goal in line always wins, eventually at the end of B I
am killing members of C freely, and finally I give up B and become C.
This is why running in session being murdered and murdering others,
and others murdering others is so important to case gain. Most of the
pain and charge on any goal is at the beginning of it, when one is being
harrassed by members of one's previous goal, and then at the end of
one's goal when one is harassing the members of the next goal in line.
And so it goes, goal after goal, until one ends up in the present
life, part way through a present cluster, but probably not to the end of
it where murder is wanton :) but possibly near the beginning being
harassed by your own kind of your previous goal.
So members of A are murdering B because B is winning and eventually
A becomes B. But B is murdering C because C is winning, and eventually
becomes C.
How here is the interesting part.
When the being first leaves A and becomes B, he is still being
murdered BY members of A, because B is winning against A.
So B is being suppressed by A, even though in the end B prevails
against A.
But B is also getting infuriated by C and taking up murdering them
wholesale, and is losing to C!
So B is suppressing C, and eventually loses to C, and thus becomes
C.
So B is being suppressed BY A, but B wins in the ends, and members
of A become B.
And B is suppressing C, and B loses to C, so members of B become C
in the end.
If there are a whole long line of goals, A, B, C, D etc, say 30 or
40 of them, then you can see how people in a universe are sashaying down
this list of goals by the bad things done to them from the earlier goal
on their track, and the bad things they are doing to the goal later on
the track.
Further the last goal on the chain opposes the first one at the
beginning, so when everyone gets down to the last goal there is, they
start opposing the first goal all over again, lose to it, and become it,
now starting over at the top.
Since many of us have already been through this loop more than
once, everyone kind of 'knows' what the next goal in line is going to be
for them, and anyhow they are very busy kamikaze-ing the hell out of it
in this life.
Spot who or what you really want to kill but good in this life, and
then spot what they represent to you, and you will have the goal next in
line for you when you finally fail to wipe them all out and become like
them starting a new cluster of lives.
Since everyone is spread out across all goals, there are always
people in earlier goals to murder us, and people in later goals for us
to murder.
So remember although we tend to focus on exactly WHO represents
each goal that we are fighting with, it is WHAT THEY REPRESENT TO YOU
that is more important to ending the conflict and healing the body.
So one way you can find your goal, and the one earlier, and the one
later is as follows:
Who or what is suppressing you? (A suppressing you as B)
Who or what are you suppressing? (You as B suppressing C)
Once you find A, B, and C for this life time, with you as B, you
can probably end the war and walk out of it for the most part.
Homer
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
Thu May 31 16:17:37 EDT 2012
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
Thursday, May 31, 2012
PROBLEMS
PROBLEMS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
LeadMiner (tlnLeads@gmail.com) wrote:
>Thank you Homer. That helps.
>But how would we apply this to a concrete example, such as a belief or
>an attitude like, "I hate my job" or "I hate John because ...[fill in
>the blank]"
The hatred is a fumarole powered by underlying big stuff.
Much hate for others is actually an alter-is of hate for
ourselves.
Most 'problems' that people have that they complain about are
cover ups for problems they can't confront at all and don't know about
any more. The one's they know about take their attention off the
one's that scare the living daylights out of them.
But the unconfrontable problems that are hidden are preceeded by
even bigger problems that the being COULD confront but chose not to.
Can confront -> won't confront -> can't confront -> complaints
about life stuck conditions.
Its like this, problem 1 long ago was 190 miles wide but
you were 200 miles wide, so you could confront it easily.
But you said, nah let's not confront this, that's boring, rather
have the problem than lose it. This is NOT a flaw, its a joke, you are
playing on yourself.
Then later another problem comes up that is 90 miles wide but you
are only 80 miles wide due to your prior postulate of won't confront.
so this problem is 'bigger than you' and you CAN'T confront it. This is
such a ruin it sinks into oblvion forever more.
Later you find yourself surrounded by a thousand 2 foot wide
problems, and even though you are 4 feet wide, you can't do
anything about them, because that would take you back to the real
problem you couldn't confront earlier when you were 80 miles wide.
Thus the alter-is seeps up through the haze of oblivion attaching
very deep fears to apparent present time annoyances.
Hate is about stopping by the way, there is a lot more to life
that you are trying to stop than your job.
But how can you stop something you didn't start? That's the
DEFINITION of psycho, trying to stop something he thinks he didn't
start.
Or trying to start something he didn't stop.
The way to stop something is to start it again. Just confronting
is a kind of continuous present time recreation of the confronted.
That gets you out of the resistence that is piling up.
But it is completely impossible to confront the later annoyances
because they just grind and grind and grind and will wear you down.
And it is also completely impossible to confront the biggy you
left behind, because its bigger than you.
But you CAN confront the prime problem that started the
whole chain because you were and are bigger than it all along.
So that's the lie, life has done me in. No you did yourself
in, but now its real until you regather the original lie out of
the original incident.
Once you say something is unconfrontable, everything from there
on out IS unconfrontable, and no way around it without undoing the
original god postulate holding you down.
"What do you hate about your job?"
"What do you love about your job?"
Back and forth will bring truths to the surface that are
necessary to as-is the real reasons attention is fixated.
The hate for your job is a fumarole of hate sitting on a volcano
of hate. Life is millions of little fumaroles blowing steam, charge,
pain etc, with zero awareness of the volcanic power going on
underneath. Find what you REALLY hate, the *BIG* one, the one that is
ruining you into disaster forever more, and all the other stuff stops
being important, and becomes changeable.
It isn't easy doing this, you are not a small being up against a
small problem.
You are an infinite being up against an infinite problem
pretending to be overwhelmed by finite problems.
The original problem was no problems, just couldn't get them
to persist no matter what you did. It really pissed you off.
Homer
Wed Aug 30 00:08:12 EDT 2006
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Thu May 31 03:06:03 EDT 2012
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore378.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFPxxhbURT1lqxE3HERApcfAKC9oqCBvtxDOEHxsX7QvrLGin9IDwCguvRv
hE4sQLeRaFlOkHhQkSr/cjY=
=EvS3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Homerwsmith-l mailing list
Homerwsmith-l@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
LeadMiner (tlnLeads@gmail.com) wrote:
>Thank you Homer. That helps.
>But how would we apply this to a concrete example, such as a belief or
>an attitude like, "I hate my job" or "I hate John because ...[fill in
>the blank]"
The hatred is a fumarole powered by underlying big stuff.
Much hate for others is actually an alter-is of hate for
ourselves.
Most 'problems' that people have that they complain about are
cover ups for problems they can't confront at all and don't know about
any more. The one's they know about take their attention off the
one's that scare the living daylights out of them.
But the unconfrontable problems that are hidden are preceeded by
even bigger problems that the being COULD confront but chose not to.
Can confront -> won't confront -> can't confront -> complaints
about life stuck conditions.
Its like this, problem 1 long ago was 190 miles wide but
you were 200 miles wide, so you could confront it easily.
But you said, nah let's not confront this, that's boring, rather
have the problem than lose it. This is NOT a flaw, its a joke, you are
playing on yourself.
Then later another problem comes up that is 90 miles wide but you
are only 80 miles wide due to your prior postulate of won't confront.
so this problem is 'bigger than you' and you CAN'T confront it. This is
such a ruin it sinks into oblvion forever more.
Later you find yourself surrounded by a thousand 2 foot wide
problems, and even though you are 4 feet wide, you can't do
anything about them, because that would take you back to the real
problem you couldn't confront earlier when you were 80 miles wide.
Thus the alter-is seeps up through the haze of oblivion attaching
very deep fears to apparent present time annoyances.
Hate is about stopping by the way, there is a lot more to life
that you are trying to stop than your job.
But how can you stop something you didn't start? That's the
DEFINITION of psycho, trying to stop something he thinks he didn't
start.
Or trying to start something he didn't stop.
The way to stop something is to start it again. Just confronting
is a kind of continuous present time recreation of the confronted.
That gets you out of the resistence that is piling up.
But it is completely impossible to confront the later annoyances
because they just grind and grind and grind and will wear you down.
And it is also completely impossible to confront the biggy you
left behind, because its bigger than you.
But you CAN confront the prime problem that started the
whole chain because you were and are bigger than it all along.
So that's the lie, life has done me in. No you did yourself
in, but now its real until you regather the original lie out of
the original incident.
Once you say something is unconfrontable, everything from there
on out IS unconfrontable, and no way around it without undoing the
original god postulate holding you down.
"What do you hate about your job?"
"What do you love about your job?"
Back and forth will bring truths to the surface that are
necessary to as-is the real reasons attention is fixated.
The hate for your job is a fumarole of hate sitting on a volcano
of hate. Life is millions of little fumaroles blowing steam, charge,
pain etc, with zero awareness of the volcanic power going on
underneath. Find what you REALLY hate, the *BIG* one, the one that is
ruining you into disaster forever more, and all the other stuff stops
being important, and becomes changeable.
It isn't easy doing this, you are not a small being up against a
small problem.
You are an infinite being up against an infinite problem
pretending to be overwhelmed by finite problems.
The original problem was no problems, just couldn't get them
to persist no matter what you did. It really pissed you off.
Homer
Wed Aug 30 00:08:12 EDT 2006
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Thu May 31 03:06:03 EDT 2012
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore378.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFPxxhbURT1lqxE3HERApcfAKC9oqCBvtxDOEHxsX7QvrLGin9IDwCguvRv
hE4sQLeRaFlOkHhQkSr/cjY=
=EvS3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Homerwsmith-l mailing list
Homerwsmith-l@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Wednesday, May 30, 2012
DOUBT
DOUBT
> On the other hand, you gave that reality is zero
> dimension etc. Are you saying that there is an
> absolute source to things?
> Is there anything that is apart from self?
> Is there anything that can be equated with self?
"The existence of a fundamental operating actuality is self evident."
What the nature of the actuality is, is not necessarily self evident.
Run
"Do you doubt?"
"Do you doubt that you doubt?"
until you attain absolute certainty that you do in fact doubt,
and do not doubt that you doubt.
Therefore something exists, as a nothing could not wonder
whether it was a something or a nothing.
All that we are conscious of is part of the dream of The Dreamer.
It shows a virtual world of space, time, form and event to our
conscious eye, things of dimension and compoundness. However it is
generally conceeded that the source of all this does not itself
have these qualities, in other words source sources what source
is not.
Truth projects lies.
Whether we can ultimately know about the absolute "What IS" that
projects all this relative projection is different from whether
there is such an absolute. The dream is actual, even if it is
a dream of lies, and the source of the dream must therefore be
actual.
Above all that, questioning is the primary dramatization, because
truth, knowledge and answers are the closest to home.
The trick to enlightenment is to operate the question without
trying to get the answer. DO the efforts of the question, but not to
attain the answer. This runs out the question, and what is left is
the original Truth before the question which will appear when the
question is run out.
This is what Hubbard means when he says that the exact answer to
the question is the question. When you find the question you have
been asking in all seriousness these many millions of years, you will
spot that the effort to get the answer BY asking a question is silly
and let it go. At that point you can run the question AS a question
not as an effort to get an answer, and the masses enmired in the
question will blow off, leaving the original pristine state of
knowledge.
That original state may not be of the answer you sought in the
question, but it will be an earlier Truth that makes the answer you
sought irrelevant.
Adore says "The exact attitude with which you approach asking a
question determines whether or not you get an answer.
The correct attitude is Omni Sovereignty."
Omni Sovereignty is not "I don't know and therefore I must find
out".
Omni Sovereignty is "I don't know, this is silly, let's go have a
beer".
Homer
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
> On the other hand, you gave that reality is zero
> dimension etc. Are you saying that there is an
> absolute source to things?
> Is there anything that is apart from self?
> Is there anything that can be equated with self?
"The existence of a fundamental operating actuality is self evident."
What the nature of the actuality is, is not necessarily self evident.
Run
"Do you doubt?"
"Do you doubt that you doubt?"
until you attain absolute certainty that you do in fact doubt,
and do not doubt that you doubt.
Therefore something exists, as a nothing could not wonder
whether it was a something or a nothing.
All that we are conscious of is part of the dream of The Dreamer.
It shows a virtual world of space, time, form and event to our
conscious eye, things of dimension and compoundness. However it is
generally conceeded that the source of all this does not itself
have these qualities, in other words source sources what source
is not.
Truth projects lies.
Whether we can ultimately know about the absolute "What IS" that
projects all this relative projection is different from whether
there is such an absolute. The dream is actual, even if it is
a dream of lies, and the source of the dream must therefore be
actual.
Above all that, questioning is the primary dramatization, because
truth, knowledge and answers are the closest to home.
The trick to enlightenment is to operate the question without
trying to get the answer. DO the efforts of the question, but not to
attain the answer. This runs out the question, and what is left is
the original Truth before the question which will appear when the
question is run out.
This is what Hubbard means when he says that the exact answer to
the question is the question. When you find the question you have
been asking in all seriousness these many millions of years, you will
spot that the effort to get the answer BY asking a question is silly
and let it go. At that point you can run the question AS a question
not as an effort to get an answer, and the masses enmired in the
question will blow off, leaving the original pristine state of
knowledge.
That original state may not be of the answer you sought in the
question, but it will be an earlier Truth that makes the answer you
sought irrelevant.
Adore says "The exact attitude with which you approach asking a
question determines whether or not you get an answer.
The correct attitude is Omni Sovereignty."
Omni Sovereignty is not "I don't know and therefore I must find
out".
Omni Sovereignty is "I don't know, this is silly, let's go have a
beer".
Homer
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
THE NOT SO ROUND THEORY BALL
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
THE NOT SO ROUND THEORY BALL
The effete intellectual snottery on a.r.s exceeds the capacity of
modern day science to measure it.
Dennis:
>> This is what I mean by your complexity. Assumption building on
>> assumption. Begging the question. No, Homer. All this to explain
>> why different people measuring the same thing get the same results.
I see the problem more as a closed or round theory ball, as
described in the first of the Valentine Day's Lectures on the proof.
http://www.clearing.org/cgi/archive.cgi?/homer/adore646.memo
THEORY BALLS
Theory balls consist of observations, theories, predictions,
experiments and further observations.
EVIDENCE
Observations are evidence.
THEORIES
Theories consist of specifications (daisies exist), generalizations
(all daisies grow in the summer), and causal relationships between them
or explanations, (all daisies grow in the summer because they need
sunlight.)
VERIFIABILITY and FALSIFIABILITY
Specifications can be verified but not falsified.
SPECIFICATION: Some daisies exist.
Find one daisy, and your theory that some daisies exist is proven
true.
Failing to find a daisy merely supports but does not prove your
theory false, as absence of evidence for a specification, is not
evidence against it.
GENERALIZATIONS: All daisies grow in the summer.
Generalizations can be falsified, but not verified.
Find one daisy that grows in the winter and your theory that all
daisies grow in the summer is proven false.
Failing to find one daisy that grows in the winter supports but
does not prove your theory true, as absence of evidence against a
generalization is not evidence for it.
EXPLANATIONS: All daisies grow in the summer because daisies need
sunlight to grow.
Explanations of causal relation are a kind of generalization, thus
they too can be falsified but not verified.
Find one daisy that can grow without sunlight, and your theory that
all daisies need sunlight is proven false.
Failure to find a daisy that can grow without sunlight, does not
prove your theory true, it merely supports it, as absence of evidence
against a generalization is not evidence for it.
This might sound weird, take the following experiment for example.
Turn off all the sunlight and see if all your daisies die. If they do
that supports but does not prove with perfect certainty the
generalization that ALL daisies need sunlight to live let alone that
lack of sunlight is why they die in the winter. They could also die of
the cold or length of day or shift in the magnetic field.
COMPLETE THEORY BALLS
A theory ball is 'round' or complete when all observations are
explained and all predictions are observed.
This indicates that one has a complete understanding of everything.
The problem arises when certain observations have not yet been made
or have been left out. These can crack the theory ball, or at least
make it out of round, when such observations can neither be explained
nor predicted by existing theory.
For example the physics boys are looking for the Grand Unified
Theory of Everything, they hope that by unifying the so called four
fundamental forces of nature, gravity, electromagnetism, and the weak
and strong nuclear forces, they can explain everything.
They might be able to predict and explain much of the mechanical
universe this way, but consciousness is not mechanical, as no machine
can be perfectly certain of anything, and you can.
See the proof at http://www.lightlink.com/theproof
Sorry boys, love and shame can not of force and mass be made.
Think about it, you all been taught that force and mass is all
there is, that YOU and your consciousness are only processes in force
and mass in motion, tick, tock, tick, tock.
For those of you who aren't divinity challenged, a euphemism for
shallow as a dry river bed, you know that will and motivation are not
force and mass, and you know they can't be made of force and mass. Well
neither can consiousness as a whole.
But that ain't science, that's enlightenment.
These are two different things apparently, so let's get back to
science.
ACTUAL OR VIRTUAL
Now here is my exact position on this, it has nothing to do with
belief, faith or bogus religion, it has only to do with solid science,
using both verifiability and falsifiability as guidelines.
There are a spectrum of theories to explain why we see things in
our consciousness which is a graphics rendition engine for space and
time and the objects in them, These theories range from the dreamball to
the meatball theory.
The dreamballs say that our conscious rendition is a representation
of a virtual universe, a dream or hallucination if you will. Something
seen in consciousness with no exterior existence at all.
The meatballs say that our conscious rendition is a representation
of an actual universe 'out there'. They point out into their conscious
picture to show us where exactly out there is.
WHY BOTHER WITH THEORY?
We have a number of key observations that need to be accounted for.
The primary observation is that two different people see the same
object at the same time, for example a pen on my desk. I see it, and
you see it, and so how come we have an in sync conscious experience of
that part of the landscape?
The second observation is that when I move the pen on the desk, you
see the pen move on the desk, and visa versa.
Clearly my rendition of the pen in my consciousness is somehow
causally connected to your rendition of the pen in your consciousness.
These are two incredible observations that really need to be
accounted for.
Neither one of us sees the pen directly, both of us are using our
own eyes and bodies and brains to render a likeness of the pen in our
consciousness. So how come when my rendition moves, yours does too?
THE MEATBALL THEORY
The meatball theory gives a very complicated but internally
consistent theory as to how this synchronicity could happen, namely that
there exists a single actual pen out there, photons bounce off it to
each of our eyes, albeit from different viewpoints, the nerve impulses
are rendered by our brain into our own personal 3D color rendition of the
pen.
Thus we have two people looking at one actual object from different
viewpoints.
When I exercise cause over the pen by moving it with my hand, you
pick up the change because both you and I are in causal sensory contact
with the same pen. There is a causal pathway from the pen, via photons,
to our eyes, brain, and consciousness, so when the actual pen moves, we
both get it rendered as having moved in our conscious rendition of the
common landscape.
It is the same actual pen for both of us, creating two identical
personal renditions differing only by angle of view.
Thus we have one actual pen, and two conscious renditions of that
pen, one for you and one for me. Since our renditions are each causally
connected to the actual pen, if the pen moves, both of our renditions
are changed to reflect the change in the actual pen.
Thus both our conscious rendition engines are in contact with the
same actual external universe and thus bring us consistent data about
what is going on out there.
Sanity would be defined as properly rendering that external actual
universe. In theory everyone should agree as to what is out there in
the actual universe, because even though we see it from different
viewpoints, there is only one actual thing out there, and thus
ultimately all our perceptions of it should agree.
If everyone's rendition engine renders a green tree, and mine
renders a pink elephant, mine is nuts, or out of contact.
THE DREAMBALL THEORY
The dreamball theory gives a simpler but also internally consistent
theory which says that the source of our conscious rendition of the pen
and its landscape is not sensory input from an actual external universe,
but a direct data feed from an internal and eternal source of data from
which our conscious image is rendered.
Eternity is the holographic film of space and time.
Thus both you and I can render a pen never having seen one before,
because there are no pens except those that have been so rendered.
God did not have to see a tree before conceiving of one to create.
Further somehow we can make sure that the pen I render looks the
same as the pen you render, so that we can PRETEND there is a common
actual pen out there, where there isn't.
This would be how God works, did you think it could ever be any
other way?
In other words we are sharing a co dream together. This demands a
whole new synchronization mechanism that connects the two of us so we
can render in sync with each other, 'see the same thing at the same
time', that is independent of any alleged actual universe out there,
otherwise we could never share the dream.
Notice at all times each being is seeing only his own dream, his
own rendition. But both beings have identical copies of the pen, which
having synced up into one virtual pen, can be moved and controlled by
both parties.
Ever have a shared sleep dream with someone else?
How do you think that took place?
In the meatball theory, all cause between two beings travels from
one being, OUT through the alleged exterior physical universe over to
the other being, via OUT THERE.
There is no direct cause between beings that travels directly
between beings, and not out through space and time and back again.
In the dreamball theory there is no OUT THERE, out there is only
virtual, and thus can not carry causation through itself. Thus like a
multiplayer arcade game, there must be an actual causal path between two
different beings independent of the virtual out there being displayed.
The virtual bullet you shoot causes the virtual enemy to drop not
because of any interaction between the bullet and the enemy but because
of a lower level shared rendition system that orchestrates both to act
as if they had affected each other across all players at the same time.
Thus shooter, victim, and all observers in the game see and think
that the bullet killed the victim. The bullet certainly didn't kill the
victim because it has no causal efficacy at all. The victim was killed
by the computer controlling the multi being rendition system, which
created both the bullet and the victim getting killed through
simultaneous orchestration of each player's personal rendition of the
game.
A virtual universe is a rendition engine acting AS IF there were an
actual universe and the rendition engine is in causal contact with with
that actual universe keeping track of what it going on.
Such orchestration is a pretense, as there is no actual universe
out there at all, and the rendition engine pulls its data from an
internal source that has no physical geometric similarity to the space
time universe being virtualized on the display screen, your
consciousness.
One doesn't need to have a cube in order to render a cube, only
merely needs the data that describes a cube to render a cube.
The data that describes a cube doesn't at all look like a cube!
In the meatball theory, the conscious rendition has geometric
similarity, it looks like, the actual universe it is rendering.
In the dreamball theory, the conscious rendition has no geometric
similarity to anything at all, except itself, certainly not the data it
was drawn from.
WHICH IS MORE COMPLICATED?
In that sense some might feel that the dreamball theory is more
complicated than the meatball theory, but many are just upset they spent
their whole lives hunting cause in a dream.
So if all we had to explain is why do two beings see the same
landscape and why when I move my pen, does your pen move too, then the
meatball theory might be the simplest one.
But the meatball theory says that cause travels out through the
meatball universe from being to being, or between external object and
being, using cause waves (photons), and eyes and brains etc.
Thus if a being HAS no eyes, lenses, or brains, he won't be able to
see any part of the meatball universe because he won't be able to pick
up its cause waves.
But if just one person is able to get out of his body, and see the
world where there are no eyes and no lens, and then engage others with
direct telepathy or telekinesis, and remember past lives and go dig up
the box he left wherever, then suddenly the meatball theory has met its
achilles heel of falsifiability.
If ALL communication about the meatball universe MUST travel
through the meatball universe to meatball entities such as bodies and
eyes, and just one instance can be found where communication, data about
and/or causal action in the universe is traveling with out such means,
then the meatball theory is dead out of the gate.
Now admittedly a number of paranormal phenomenon might be explained
by adding complexity to the meatball theory, stupid people often
consider that just a little more complexity and obfuscation of what they
don't understand will explain it all, just like a little more cocaine
will make them feel perfect.
The physics boys are doing this with their race to the Grand
Unified Theory of Everything. They say they are almost there, and you
say 'But what about consiousness", and they say "Oh yes well,
consciousness is just chemistry bubbling away at 98.6, you know, its
just a process in the brain, and like other brain things it is too
complex to understand presently, but we, uh, are sure the brain works
with the basic 4 forces of nature just like everything else, Occam's
Razor you know, so if we understand THEM better we will understand the
brain better and eventually we will understand consciousness too."
The hell they will.
In other words more complexity of cold dark dead matter will
produce self luminous consciousness that is capable of perfect
certainty.
Divinity = force and mass in motion.
But I suspect that scientists would be hard pressed to find the
energy waves that travel from being to being during telepathy or even
telekinesis, particularly if they are faster than light.
The amount of energy it would take to move the marble, or lift a
brick would burn a brain out, so if someone tried to do with with
physical energy, he would probably go "Scanners" on us, heads blowing
up, the whole ordeal.
So the minute you move the marble or lift a brick, someone is going
to say where the hell is the energy coming from to do this?
If he can lift the brick can he light a city? Should we be asking
for a contract? Or should he be eminently domained into being a weapon
of war for us in the name of national security?
Meatballs are so stupid, there is no negative number large enough
to measure it.
OK, sorry.
But at some point someone is going to say if we are going to hunt
the paranormal, the meatball's round theory ball ain't so round any
more, we got observations and anecdotal stories that can't be predicted
by the theory, and it is time to apply the nutcracker to it, crack it
open completely and rearrange its parts until it is round again.
The number of paranormal reports through history is staggering, and
modern science is choo-chooing in the direction of they are all
delusional. You want to be on that ride?
So we are not asking anyone to believe or have faith, but merely to
understand that they MUST have a working model of how the paranormal
could be possible before they will ever be able to replicate these
things to their satisfaction.
In this case, my gut instincts tell me this would involve reversing
the idea that consciousness arose out of actual meat, and considering
instead that virtual meat arose out of consciousness.
However there are serious consequences to this theory if true.
For one consciousness could no longer be a process in the brain
because consciousness existed before any virtual universe.
(We assume philosophically that a consciousness that existed before
the creation of space and time, and which then created space and time,
would still itself have no space or time, and thus would be
fundamentally different than an analogue or pretend consciousness
created as a process in a space time machine like the brain, whether
virtual or actual. In other words robots can say ouch, but will never
feel love or pain.)
Second consciousness can not be interfaced with a brain, because in
the far end case, the meat universe is a virtual universe and has no
actual cause traveling through it, to it, or from it at all. It's a
movie, even though the conscious unit can change the direction of the
movie according to his own choice of which way to go.
By analogy the conscious unit is both the arcade game designer and
player, although he may be playing a game he didn't design, and the
universe at large is the virtual landscape of that game, in which cause
in the landscape doesn't exist except at the pretense level.
This may be shocking and insulting to those who have committed to
the seriousness and mystery of life and the hunt for cause, but their
feelings are not science.
We can ask why would the multi being God incarnate and forget that
he had done so?
That's fine, ask all you want, but who are you going to go complain
to?
So we have shown how the meatball theory could be falsifiable.
One verifiable exteriorization and the meatball theory is past its
due date.
Can we show how the dreamball theory could be falsifiable?
That would involve verifying the assertion 'there is an actual
physical universe'. Notice that is a specification, not a
generalization.
So that's easy, show me an actual physical universe, just one, and
its done, meatballs rule.
Notice however we need to be shown an actual physical universe, not
a picture of one, nor a rendition of one, nor a representation of one,
nor a symbol of one, nor a video or one, nor a copy of one, nor a
written account of one, but the actual thing itself.
There is a philosophical problem with this demand in that a being
locked inside a room with only a TV set to see, can only see pictures
and renditions of things, thus you could never show him the actual
thing.
The being locked inside his consciousness is the same way, all he
can see is his consciousness, which is clearly a rendering engine, and
thus from the existence of the rendition which he can see, he can not
verify with absolute certainty the existence of the allegedly rendered.
What he is seeing could be a dream, imagination, hallucination or play
back from some simulated data source.
Which it is.
There is also no symmetry between proving the meatball theory and
proving the dreamball theory because in a sense the meatball theory is a
subset of the dreamball theory.
We KNOW we are conscious, and we KNOW that our consciousness is
rendering things for our edification.
So there is no need to prove that.
Only an idiot wonders whether or not he wonders.
The question only remains whether the rendered images represent
real time actualities out in the actual physical universe, or if we are
sitting in a flight simulator if you will. Both look the same, you
can't tell FROM what is rendered, whether the implied referent is
actually out there or not.
You can't break the window of your consciousness and stick your
neck out to see if the picture painted on the window matches the
actually out side.
In fact a theorem can be made from this which is that any being
that is stuck looking at something via a rendition of it, can never know
if the thing itself is there, because you can't prove the existence of A
by looking at B even if B is in fact a causally related rendition of A.
Thus if we assume that beings are in fact stuck inside their
consciousness, we can argue that it becomes impossible to know if the
implied external actuality exists.
However it is suggestably possible to know that it doesn't exist,
if in fact it doesn't.
If the meatball theory is true, then consciousness can never do any
thing outside the realm of physical causality because by definition
consciousness is MADE of physical causality, just chemistry bubbling
away at 98.6.
However one instance of consciousness violating physical causality,
then it is suggested that consciousness is not MADE of that physical
causality because it is virtualizing it instead, and the need to assert
that meat is actual falls away.
This doesn't prove meat doesn't exist, but we start to lose
interest in meat in the absence of impelling reasons to keep it around.
Much better to study consciousness of meat and what consciousness
can do than study the meat which consciousness renders, which may not
even be out there. Except of course as a virtual game to get fed etc.
THE NATURE AND EXISTENCE OF THE RENDITION ENGINE BECOMES MUCH MORE
IMPORTANT THAN ANYTHING IT CAN RENDER.
You might not be able to eat knowledge about consciousness, but you
might be able to create a world where you don't have a body that 'needs
to eat', or other pesky little dreams.
The only reason people are in love with the meatball theory is
because they know THEY exist, and they want to know why. The meatball
theory claims meat exists and thus explains why consciousness exists,
namely that consciousness is a process in meat.
One you show that consciousness can do something that meat can't,
and that consciousness can exist independent of meat or space and time
and anything in it, then consciousness takes on its own stature and the
existence of meat becomes moot.
The primary thing that consciousness can do that meat can't is the
function of perfect certainty of itself and what it sees.
A space time machine can not do that.
Learn the proof. http://www.lightlink.com/theproof
Thus we already have some slightest evidence enough that
consciousness is not meat, which gives us courage to study the dreamball
theory to see if we can explain and replicate all these very many
anecdotal reports of para normal powers.
If beings share a dream by telepathy even when awake, and there is
no external cause at all, then clearly the God function that keeps the
waking dreams going is already operating telepathy, telekinesis, and
creation all the time, or we wouldn't be able to create and experience
dreams together.
Tapping in to the God function then just becomes a matter of
understanding how.
Understanding how to get back to God, involves only understanding
how and why we left it.
The way in, is the way out.
Practice coming in, puts you out.
That one line my friends leads to a WHOLE technology of repairing
God hood.
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Sat Jan 30 01:14:03 EST 2010
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Tue May 29 03:06:03 EDT 2012
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore710.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFPxHVbURT1lqxE3HERAvXaAJ9p6b+Dp3MoovGnM+Jjd+6bZ2x/VQCffNI5
IFFUvnpGOHmWRI57rPP6Cx0=
=KUlD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Homerwsmith-l mailing list
Homerwsmith-l@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
THE NOT SO ROUND THEORY BALL
The effete intellectual snottery on a.r.s exceeds the capacity of
modern day science to measure it.
Dennis:
>> This is what I mean by your complexity. Assumption building on
>> assumption. Begging the question. No, Homer. All this to explain
>> why different people measuring the same thing get the same results.
I see the problem more as a closed or round theory ball, as
described in the first of the Valentine Day's Lectures on the proof.
http://www.clearing.org/cgi/archive.cgi?/homer/adore646.memo
THEORY BALLS
Theory balls consist of observations, theories, predictions,
experiments and further observations.
EVIDENCE
Observations are evidence.
THEORIES
Theories consist of specifications (daisies exist), generalizations
(all daisies grow in the summer), and causal relationships between them
or explanations, (all daisies grow in the summer because they need
sunlight.)
VERIFIABILITY and FALSIFIABILITY
Specifications can be verified but not falsified.
SPECIFICATION: Some daisies exist.
Find one daisy, and your theory that some daisies exist is proven
true.
Failing to find a daisy merely supports but does not prove your
theory false, as absence of evidence for a specification, is not
evidence against it.
GENERALIZATIONS: All daisies grow in the summer.
Generalizations can be falsified, but not verified.
Find one daisy that grows in the winter and your theory that all
daisies grow in the summer is proven false.
Failing to find one daisy that grows in the winter supports but
does not prove your theory true, as absence of evidence against a
generalization is not evidence for it.
EXPLANATIONS: All daisies grow in the summer because daisies need
sunlight to grow.
Explanations of causal relation are a kind of generalization, thus
they too can be falsified but not verified.
Find one daisy that can grow without sunlight, and your theory that
all daisies need sunlight is proven false.
Failure to find a daisy that can grow without sunlight, does not
prove your theory true, it merely supports it, as absence of evidence
against a generalization is not evidence for it.
This might sound weird, take the following experiment for example.
Turn off all the sunlight and see if all your daisies die. If they do
that supports but does not prove with perfect certainty the
generalization that ALL daisies need sunlight to live let alone that
lack of sunlight is why they die in the winter. They could also die of
the cold or length of day or shift in the magnetic field.
COMPLETE THEORY BALLS
A theory ball is 'round' or complete when all observations are
explained and all predictions are observed.
This indicates that one has a complete understanding of everything.
The problem arises when certain observations have not yet been made
or have been left out. These can crack the theory ball, or at least
make it out of round, when such observations can neither be explained
nor predicted by existing theory.
For example the physics boys are looking for the Grand Unified
Theory of Everything, they hope that by unifying the so called four
fundamental forces of nature, gravity, electromagnetism, and the weak
and strong nuclear forces, they can explain everything.
They might be able to predict and explain much of the mechanical
universe this way, but consciousness is not mechanical, as no machine
can be perfectly certain of anything, and you can.
See the proof at http://www.lightlink.com/theproof
Sorry boys, love and shame can not of force and mass be made.
Think about it, you all been taught that force and mass is all
there is, that YOU and your consciousness are only processes in force
and mass in motion, tick, tock, tick, tock.
For those of you who aren't divinity challenged, a euphemism for
shallow as a dry river bed, you know that will and motivation are not
force and mass, and you know they can't be made of force and mass. Well
neither can consiousness as a whole.
But that ain't science, that's enlightenment.
These are two different things apparently, so let's get back to
science.
ACTUAL OR VIRTUAL
Now here is my exact position on this, it has nothing to do with
belief, faith or bogus religion, it has only to do with solid science,
using both verifiability and falsifiability as guidelines.
There are a spectrum of theories to explain why we see things in
our consciousness which is a graphics rendition engine for space and
time and the objects in them, These theories range from the dreamball to
the meatball theory.
The dreamballs say that our conscious rendition is a representation
of a virtual universe, a dream or hallucination if you will. Something
seen in consciousness with no exterior existence at all.
The meatballs say that our conscious rendition is a representation
of an actual universe 'out there'. They point out into their conscious
picture to show us where exactly out there is.
WHY BOTHER WITH THEORY?
We have a number of key observations that need to be accounted for.
The primary observation is that two different people see the same
object at the same time, for example a pen on my desk. I see it, and
you see it, and so how come we have an in sync conscious experience of
that part of the landscape?
The second observation is that when I move the pen on the desk, you
see the pen move on the desk, and visa versa.
Clearly my rendition of the pen in my consciousness is somehow
causally connected to your rendition of the pen in your consciousness.
These are two incredible observations that really need to be
accounted for.
Neither one of us sees the pen directly, both of us are using our
own eyes and bodies and brains to render a likeness of the pen in our
consciousness. So how come when my rendition moves, yours does too?
THE MEATBALL THEORY
The meatball theory gives a very complicated but internally
consistent theory as to how this synchronicity could happen, namely that
there exists a single actual pen out there, photons bounce off it to
each of our eyes, albeit from different viewpoints, the nerve impulses
are rendered by our brain into our own personal 3D color rendition of the
pen.
Thus we have two people looking at one actual object from different
viewpoints.
When I exercise cause over the pen by moving it with my hand, you
pick up the change because both you and I are in causal sensory contact
with the same pen. There is a causal pathway from the pen, via photons,
to our eyes, brain, and consciousness, so when the actual pen moves, we
both get it rendered as having moved in our conscious rendition of the
common landscape.
It is the same actual pen for both of us, creating two identical
personal renditions differing only by angle of view.
Thus we have one actual pen, and two conscious renditions of that
pen, one for you and one for me. Since our renditions are each causally
connected to the actual pen, if the pen moves, both of our renditions
are changed to reflect the change in the actual pen.
Thus both our conscious rendition engines are in contact with the
same actual external universe and thus bring us consistent data about
what is going on out there.
Sanity would be defined as properly rendering that external actual
universe. In theory everyone should agree as to what is out there in
the actual universe, because even though we see it from different
viewpoints, there is only one actual thing out there, and thus
ultimately all our perceptions of it should agree.
If everyone's rendition engine renders a green tree, and mine
renders a pink elephant, mine is nuts, or out of contact.
THE DREAMBALL THEORY
The dreamball theory gives a simpler but also internally consistent
theory which says that the source of our conscious rendition of the pen
and its landscape is not sensory input from an actual external universe,
but a direct data feed from an internal and eternal source of data from
which our conscious image is rendered.
Eternity is the holographic film of space and time.
Thus both you and I can render a pen never having seen one before,
because there are no pens except those that have been so rendered.
God did not have to see a tree before conceiving of one to create.
Further somehow we can make sure that the pen I render looks the
same as the pen you render, so that we can PRETEND there is a common
actual pen out there, where there isn't.
This would be how God works, did you think it could ever be any
other way?
In other words we are sharing a co dream together. This demands a
whole new synchronization mechanism that connects the two of us so we
can render in sync with each other, 'see the same thing at the same
time', that is independent of any alleged actual universe out there,
otherwise we could never share the dream.
Notice at all times each being is seeing only his own dream, his
own rendition. But both beings have identical copies of the pen, which
having synced up into one virtual pen, can be moved and controlled by
both parties.
Ever have a shared sleep dream with someone else?
How do you think that took place?
In the meatball theory, all cause between two beings travels from
one being, OUT through the alleged exterior physical universe over to
the other being, via OUT THERE.
There is no direct cause between beings that travels directly
between beings, and not out through space and time and back again.
In the dreamball theory there is no OUT THERE, out there is only
virtual, and thus can not carry causation through itself. Thus like a
multiplayer arcade game, there must be an actual causal path between two
different beings independent of the virtual out there being displayed.
The virtual bullet you shoot causes the virtual enemy to drop not
because of any interaction between the bullet and the enemy but because
of a lower level shared rendition system that orchestrates both to act
as if they had affected each other across all players at the same time.
Thus shooter, victim, and all observers in the game see and think
that the bullet killed the victim. The bullet certainly didn't kill the
victim because it has no causal efficacy at all. The victim was killed
by the computer controlling the multi being rendition system, which
created both the bullet and the victim getting killed through
simultaneous orchestration of each player's personal rendition of the
game.
A virtual universe is a rendition engine acting AS IF there were an
actual universe and the rendition engine is in causal contact with with
that actual universe keeping track of what it going on.
Such orchestration is a pretense, as there is no actual universe
out there at all, and the rendition engine pulls its data from an
internal source that has no physical geometric similarity to the space
time universe being virtualized on the display screen, your
consciousness.
One doesn't need to have a cube in order to render a cube, only
merely needs the data that describes a cube to render a cube.
The data that describes a cube doesn't at all look like a cube!
In the meatball theory, the conscious rendition has geometric
similarity, it looks like, the actual universe it is rendering.
In the dreamball theory, the conscious rendition has no geometric
similarity to anything at all, except itself, certainly not the data it
was drawn from.
WHICH IS MORE COMPLICATED?
In that sense some might feel that the dreamball theory is more
complicated than the meatball theory, but many are just upset they spent
their whole lives hunting cause in a dream.
So if all we had to explain is why do two beings see the same
landscape and why when I move my pen, does your pen move too, then the
meatball theory might be the simplest one.
But the meatball theory says that cause travels out through the
meatball universe from being to being, or between external object and
being, using cause waves (photons), and eyes and brains etc.
Thus if a being HAS no eyes, lenses, or brains, he won't be able to
see any part of the meatball universe because he won't be able to pick
up its cause waves.
But if just one person is able to get out of his body, and see the
world where there are no eyes and no lens, and then engage others with
direct telepathy or telekinesis, and remember past lives and go dig up
the box he left wherever, then suddenly the meatball theory has met its
achilles heel of falsifiability.
If ALL communication about the meatball universe MUST travel
through the meatball universe to meatball entities such as bodies and
eyes, and just one instance can be found where communication, data about
and/or causal action in the universe is traveling with out such means,
then the meatball theory is dead out of the gate.
Now admittedly a number of paranormal phenomenon might be explained
by adding complexity to the meatball theory, stupid people often
consider that just a little more complexity and obfuscation of what they
don't understand will explain it all, just like a little more cocaine
will make them feel perfect.
The physics boys are doing this with their race to the Grand
Unified Theory of Everything. They say they are almost there, and you
say 'But what about consiousness", and they say "Oh yes well,
consciousness is just chemistry bubbling away at 98.6, you know, its
just a process in the brain, and like other brain things it is too
complex to understand presently, but we, uh, are sure the brain works
with the basic 4 forces of nature just like everything else, Occam's
Razor you know, so if we understand THEM better we will understand the
brain better and eventually we will understand consciousness too."
The hell they will.
In other words more complexity of cold dark dead matter will
produce self luminous consciousness that is capable of perfect
certainty.
Divinity = force and mass in motion.
But I suspect that scientists would be hard pressed to find the
energy waves that travel from being to being during telepathy or even
telekinesis, particularly if they are faster than light.
The amount of energy it would take to move the marble, or lift a
brick would burn a brain out, so if someone tried to do with with
physical energy, he would probably go "Scanners" on us, heads blowing
up, the whole ordeal.
So the minute you move the marble or lift a brick, someone is going
to say where the hell is the energy coming from to do this?
If he can lift the brick can he light a city? Should we be asking
for a contract? Or should he be eminently domained into being a weapon
of war for us in the name of national security?
Meatballs are so stupid, there is no negative number large enough
to measure it.
OK, sorry.
But at some point someone is going to say if we are going to hunt
the paranormal, the meatball's round theory ball ain't so round any
more, we got observations and anecdotal stories that can't be predicted
by the theory, and it is time to apply the nutcracker to it, crack it
open completely and rearrange its parts until it is round again.
The number of paranormal reports through history is staggering, and
modern science is choo-chooing in the direction of they are all
delusional. You want to be on that ride?
So we are not asking anyone to believe or have faith, but merely to
understand that they MUST have a working model of how the paranormal
could be possible before they will ever be able to replicate these
things to their satisfaction.
In this case, my gut instincts tell me this would involve reversing
the idea that consciousness arose out of actual meat, and considering
instead that virtual meat arose out of consciousness.
However there are serious consequences to this theory if true.
For one consciousness could no longer be a process in the brain
because consciousness existed before any virtual universe.
(We assume philosophically that a consciousness that existed before
the creation of space and time, and which then created space and time,
would still itself have no space or time, and thus would be
fundamentally different than an analogue or pretend consciousness
created as a process in a space time machine like the brain, whether
virtual or actual. In other words robots can say ouch, but will never
feel love or pain.)
Second consciousness can not be interfaced with a brain, because in
the far end case, the meat universe is a virtual universe and has no
actual cause traveling through it, to it, or from it at all. It's a
movie, even though the conscious unit can change the direction of the
movie according to his own choice of which way to go.
By analogy the conscious unit is both the arcade game designer and
player, although he may be playing a game he didn't design, and the
universe at large is the virtual landscape of that game, in which cause
in the landscape doesn't exist except at the pretense level.
This may be shocking and insulting to those who have committed to
the seriousness and mystery of life and the hunt for cause, but their
feelings are not science.
We can ask why would the multi being God incarnate and forget that
he had done so?
That's fine, ask all you want, but who are you going to go complain
to?
So we have shown how the meatball theory could be falsifiable.
One verifiable exteriorization and the meatball theory is past its
due date.
Can we show how the dreamball theory could be falsifiable?
That would involve verifying the assertion 'there is an actual
physical universe'. Notice that is a specification, not a
generalization.
So that's easy, show me an actual physical universe, just one, and
its done, meatballs rule.
Notice however we need to be shown an actual physical universe, not
a picture of one, nor a rendition of one, nor a representation of one,
nor a symbol of one, nor a video or one, nor a copy of one, nor a
written account of one, but the actual thing itself.
There is a philosophical problem with this demand in that a being
locked inside a room with only a TV set to see, can only see pictures
and renditions of things, thus you could never show him the actual
thing.
The being locked inside his consciousness is the same way, all he
can see is his consciousness, which is clearly a rendering engine, and
thus from the existence of the rendition which he can see, he can not
verify with absolute certainty the existence of the allegedly rendered.
What he is seeing could be a dream, imagination, hallucination or play
back from some simulated data source.
Which it is.
There is also no symmetry between proving the meatball theory and
proving the dreamball theory because in a sense the meatball theory is a
subset of the dreamball theory.
We KNOW we are conscious, and we KNOW that our consciousness is
rendering things for our edification.
So there is no need to prove that.
Only an idiot wonders whether or not he wonders.
The question only remains whether the rendered images represent
real time actualities out in the actual physical universe, or if we are
sitting in a flight simulator if you will. Both look the same, you
can't tell FROM what is rendered, whether the implied referent is
actually out there or not.
You can't break the window of your consciousness and stick your
neck out to see if the picture painted on the window matches the
actually out side.
In fact a theorem can be made from this which is that any being
that is stuck looking at something via a rendition of it, can never know
if the thing itself is there, because you can't prove the existence of A
by looking at B even if B is in fact a causally related rendition of A.
Thus if we assume that beings are in fact stuck inside their
consciousness, we can argue that it becomes impossible to know if the
implied external actuality exists.
However it is suggestably possible to know that it doesn't exist,
if in fact it doesn't.
If the meatball theory is true, then consciousness can never do any
thing outside the realm of physical causality because by definition
consciousness is MADE of physical causality, just chemistry bubbling
away at 98.6.
However one instance of consciousness violating physical causality,
then it is suggested that consciousness is not MADE of that physical
causality because it is virtualizing it instead, and the need to assert
that meat is actual falls away.
This doesn't prove meat doesn't exist, but we start to lose
interest in meat in the absence of impelling reasons to keep it around.
Much better to study consciousness of meat and what consciousness
can do than study the meat which consciousness renders, which may not
even be out there. Except of course as a virtual game to get fed etc.
THE NATURE AND EXISTENCE OF THE RENDITION ENGINE BECOMES MUCH MORE
IMPORTANT THAN ANYTHING IT CAN RENDER.
You might not be able to eat knowledge about consciousness, but you
might be able to create a world where you don't have a body that 'needs
to eat', or other pesky little dreams.
The only reason people are in love with the meatball theory is
because they know THEY exist, and they want to know why. The meatball
theory claims meat exists and thus explains why consciousness exists,
namely that consciousness is a process in meat.
One you show that consciousness can do something that meat can't,
and that consciousness can exist independent of meat or space and time
and anything in it, then consciousness takes on its own stature and the
existence of meat becomes moot.
The primary thing that consciousness can do that meat can't is the
function of perfect certainty of itself and what it sees.
A space time machine can not do that.
Learn the proof. http://www.lightlink.com/theproof
Thus we already have some slightest evidence enough that
consciousness is not meat, which gives us courage to study the dreamball
theory to see if we can explain and replicate all these very many
anecdotal reports of para normal powers.
If beings share a dream by telepathy even when awake, and there is
no external cause at all, then clearly the God function that keeps the
waking dreams going is already operating telepathy, telekinesis, and
creation all the time, or we wouldn't be able to create and experience
dreams together.
Tapping in to the God function then just becomes a matter of
understanding how.
Understanding how to get back to God, involves only understanding
how and why we left it.
The way in, is the way out.
Practice coming in, puts you out.
That one line my friends leads to a WHOLE technology of repairing
God hood.
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Sat Jan 30 01:14:03 EST 2010
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Tue May 29 03:06:03 EDT 2012
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore710.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFPxHVbURT1lqxE3HERAvXaAJ9p6b+Dp3MoovGnM+Jjd+6bZ2x/VQCffNI5
IFFUvnpGOHmWRI57rPP6Cx0=
=KUlD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Homerwsmith-l mailing list
Homerwsmith-l@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Monday, May 28, 2012
TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE SURVIVAL OF OTHERS
TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE SURVIVAL OF OTHERS
PREAMBLE
Aberrated people like to define various areas of inquiry out of
existence by usurping the words used to properly discuss these areas for
their own ends.
For example in the dictionary it will tell you interpretation means
rendition, and rendition means interpretation. This totally short
circuits any discussion about the DIFFERENCES between referents and
symbols.
Referents are rendered into symbols, and one interprets symbols
back into referents.
Another clear breach of understandings caused by such chicanery, is
engendered by misuse of the term responsibility, in particular the
phrase 'to be responsible for.'
"To be responsible for" means to be the knowing willing cause of.
"To take responsibility for something" means to own up to having
created that something.
You make a mess of things, you take responsibility for the mess by
owning up to being the causal creator of the mess.
However to 'take responsibility for' is also used to mean to come
across a mess that you did not create, and may not know who did create
it, but then to add your cause into it to make it better.
In this sense "to take responsibility for" means to take control of
or over an existing situation in order to change or guide its future
direction to a better end.
In the first sense, responsible people cause things.
In the second sense, responsible people look after or take care of
things already caused.
The Nanny didn't cause the kid but she makes damn sure it grows up
right, once invited in to take care of it.
Technically we like to discriminate between these two usages by
saying the creator is responsible FOR an area, and the creature TAKES
responsibility OVER an area after the fact of its creation.
Thus the creator takes responsibility by owning up to having caused
something.
The creature takes responsibility over what the creator has created
and left behind for him to manage and improve.
But the english language will have none of it, everyone uses the
two phrases interchangeably to great harm.
When someone demands 'Who is responsible for this mess?', does he
want the guy who created it, or the guy who is cleaning it up?
Thus in this posting we concede to the bastardizations of the
masses and where we mean to discuss 'taking responsibility OVER
something,' we will say instead 'taking responsibility FOR' something.
In this process, we are not interested at all in who created things
as they are, we are only interested in who or what is trying to do
something about them to the betterment of everything.
THIS UNIVERSE
This universe is an 8 cylinder engine, 10 if you want to include
aesthetics and ethics, 16 if you want to include decency, truth,
awareness, individuality, coexistence, and consciousness.
For the moment the standard lower 8 will do.
They are concentric circles of encompassment:
8,) The Infinite
7.) Spirit
6.) MEST
5.) Life
4.) Mankind
3.) Groups
2.) Family
1.) Self
Each dynamic is a subset of and is included in the dynamic above
it.
It is called a dynamic because each is an arena of active
consumption and production towards survival, where hopefully one is
producing more than consuming and thus surviving well, prospering and
flourishing, and creating affluence for the greatest good of the
greatest number.
Each dynamic goal goes a bit deeper than only survival, because it
is really about cycles of action, namely create, survive and destroy.
Cycles of action have to include destroy in order to make room for
new creation.
So keep that in mind when we talk about survival, we really mean
create, survive and destroy depending on what stage the being is in on
each dynamic goal he is pursuing.
BASIC PURPOSE
A child's understanding of its 'basic purpose' is incident upon its
individuation in this life, first awareness of self and personal agency,
that is I AM, I KNOW, I WANT and I DO.
I AM is his basic self awareness through the facility of perfect
certainty born of self luminous consciousness of which he is a unit.
I KNOW is the collected and collecting understandings of himself
and life and how it works.
I WANT is his basic purpose at the moment.
I DO is his personal agency functioning through operating
responsibility.
A basic purpose or goal is a desire to engage in a cycle of action
towards the survival of many someones or somethings on all of the 8
dynamics.
Beings have dynamic goals that are very short from start to
attainment, others are many life times long and are called trans life
time goals.
I been working on a star drive for eons, but I had to learn to add
first, you see?
There are also trans universe goals, and trans eternity goals,
which are the primary reasons he chooses to manifest in the first place.
Manifestations happen in grand cycles of snooze to dream back to
snooze again.
Nothing is kept from dream to dream, each dream is complete in
itself, but the primary why to manifest remains the same, to share self
love with others.
But a dream can contain many sub dreams within dreams, universes
within universes, life time after life time. In this sense goals
started long ago in one universe, or one life, may still be continuing
in this life and universe until they are finally finished a long time
down the road in maybe yet another universe.
Sleep in time during an ongoing dream is a mockery of the Big
Snooze between cycles of manifestation.
The Big Snooze is utter eternal immutable unimpingability until the
self generated call to the next manifestation happens.
The total time of a particular cycle of manifestation can be untold
trillions upon trillions of years between big snoozes, but they are
always finite, and the being can get time off from a dream, back to the
big snooze, for a while if he manages his dreamtime properly.
Dreamtime between big snoozes is manifestation via the operation of
dynamic thrust towards many different goals across however many dynamics
there are, which in this universe are 8.
Thus the dynamic thrust of an individual, called by Freud his
libido, is an 8 pronged rush into existence to get something done in the
time allotted, from the dynamic of self in this lifetime to the dynamic
of the infinite cross all Eternities.
One might well ask how cauld one have a goal on or to enhance the
infinite. When you find it, you will know it.
So it isn't just one basic purpose that a child has, like to be a
doctor or play the piano, its a universally wide matrix of purposes that
interplay with each other across all the dynamics.
OPPOSITION AND OVERRUN.
People crash and get sick to the degree that their basic purposes
are blunted by opposition, or overrun during dreamtime.
Crashing means the dynamic thrust turns around and hits the floor
like a rocket that will not fly or goes into a wall it can not overcome.
An opposed or blunted purpose means the purpose ran into an
overwhelming opposition, and the being gets stopped on his impulse to
create, survive or destroy something of importance to him on one or more
dynamics, and he gives up, changes course, and never looks back, never
takes it up again.
Instead he starts to pursue a substitute purpose, still powered by
the emotion of his original basic purpose which is now suffering in
anger, fear, sorrow and apathy, and so his every effort makes him sick
and his life is a sinking ship.
He is operating on the right intention at ground zero, but every
effort and direction he takes from there is wrong.
The power is still there, but rather than flowing smoothly with
love towards its true purpose and destiny, its flow is of sorrow,
enturbulated, chaotic and confused by the oppositions in the way of the
flow.
Nothing sadder than to see a river of power turn against itself.
Eventually even the river runs out of tears and can cry no more
because it can love no more.
Sorrow is simply enturbulated love, no sorrow, no love.
For most, before they can recover the ability to love, they have to
recover sorrow and the ability to cry forever.
OVERRUN
An overrun purpose is a time where the being actually accomplished
all or part of a basic purpose, but fails to acknowledge the win and
move on.
Instead he continues to try to win, when he has already done so,
and thus he starts to lose by definition, under the power of his
consideration that he hasn't won yet.
Again he eventually succumbs to substitute purposes and the death
they entail to his endless beautiful future.
Most beings are a complex mess of both being stopped and overrun.
They deride and pour contempt on brightness, and so their future is
gray, bleak, grim or finite.
Some games were just too hard to play at the time, the problem was
not that he lost, but that he gave up forever and turned to a new
heading rather than put it on the back burner to approach it again one
day. Actually he did, but he has long since forgotten that the back
burner is there with stacks of failures waiting to be rekindled.
Some games he won, but were so beautiful he didn't want to say good
bye to them yet, so he pretended he was still trying and continued to
play.
Both are death, because the being failed to create a BIGGER MORE
beautiful game and play that. Instead the being got smaller, and lost
his way in endless turning from his course of action to some other
direction. Enough of that and you are going in circles, but its a
dwindling spiral because the being is getting smaller and smaller with
each turn.
HOW TO AUDIT
In breaking open the ball of charge created by being stopped or
overrun on basic purposes, one has to address each of the dynamics and
all of the events that took place on them. They are all right there
waiting to be audited.
If this is done properly, the being will rehab his willingness and
ability to operate on each dynamic again, either with a new bigger basic
purpose, or getting on with the original one to final completion.
That results in a life of triumph rather than defeat.
The final triumph is eternality, and the final defeat is hell
forever or death forever for those who can no longer confront
their own hells.
However no hell can outlast a true confession, and that is what
auditing is about.
In early childhood where basic purposes are first posited, they are
usually unstated. The child does not yet have the words for them,
probably no body has the words for them.
The child does not get out of bed and say 'One day I am going to
...', but yet there he is every day getting out of bed and being, doing,
or having whatever ... is.
Thus when a purpose gets overwhelmed by opposition, either by the
people around him who would just faint if he ever did well, or the
universe at large that can be pretty mean for a small child, the
experience of failure will be strong but not verbally detailed, and
certainly not talked out to cognitions and very good indicators
with anyone.
Usually the being just rolls up in a ball and tries to forget he
ever had any dreams.
It is an 8 dynamic ball with the power of the roaring Mississippi
behind it, and unrolling it can be hard.
Almost everyone in a child's early life are lost souls like he too
is soon to become. There is no help in them.
Eventually the child grows up and becomes an adult, and, well we
all know what "Gr'ups" are like. (From Startrek.)
For example when I was a child, I was brought up mostly in a world
of science, but also the normal background noise of religion. I wanted
to believe in God and an after life, but I just couldn't quite see my
way to it.
Santa Claus made more sense than Jesus.
One day, I must have been 8 or 9, I was reading a book on the solar
system and getting an idea of just how big space and time really were.
Being a meatball I still believed in their actuality, but I always
knew I could be dreaming. But I couldn't believe that if I were
dreaming, no one else had noticed this fact, so I crashed into accepting
that things were as they looked, and I was made of meat and operated out
of a brain.
That would have made me a basically healthy meatball like everyone
else.
But then that one day I was reading this book on the solar system,
and I got to the last chapter entitled 'How the Earth might end.'
It went into detail about an asteroid coming in from outer space
and smashing the earth to pieces never to be any more.
Because I was young, I went into a thunderous confused shock on the
matter, I could barely stand up, and I wasn't thinking very clearly.
I did not have a good idea of where life came from, and I wasn't
clear headed enough to wonder if life on other planets existed, and I
didn't know that life could regenerate it self elsewhere if destroyed
here.
So I got this feeling of EVERYTHING GONE, which restimulated my EOE
chain which is very deep.
EOE = End of Everything.
Worse I started to think about the God question again, and I tried
to imagine a being that would create a universe that was so opposed to
itself that it would or could wipe out all of life and sentience forever
and the AllThatIs would just continue on for an eternity with no one in
it, serving no purpose at all.
That an INTELLIGENT creator could create such a thing, turned on my
monster chain, as such a creator would have to be a monster.
If you have ever felt monster vibrations, you might want to take a
look at it, namely the interplay between intelligent intent and utter
absolute destruction of everything everywhere forever more.
So what happened that day was, whatever my goals were regarding
life on Earth and MEST on the 5th and 6th dynamics, died and along with
it most of the rest of my life. If the higher dynamics die they take
out the lower dynamics with them.
If there wasn't going to be an Earth, why bother having a family or
learn how birds fly?
What were those goals?
Well as I said, all goals on all dynamics are IN GENERAL for the
same thing, namely to engage in cycles of action, consumption and
production, along those dynamics to create, survive and destroy.
Now looking in hindsight I would say that my goal on the sixth
dynamic was something like:
"To make the Earth Survive."
To survive against what you might ask?
Well there are a lot of things that are going to test the survival
of life and civilization on Earth that a little child could wrap its
wits around, but if an asteroid is going to come in and wipe it all
away, why bother?
And if there is a God, such an event would prove that God was a
monster, which had seemed like he was anyhow up to that point, so my
interest changed suddenly and dramatically from science, which now
seemed like a waste of time, to religion which was much more important
to solve.
We know the asteroid exists.
I had felt the monster, so I knew the Devil existed.
The question remained does God exist, and if so, what do we DO
about him? Do we help him or harm him?
Was God our savior or was God the monster?
My gut feeling was that even God was afraid of the monster.
I couldn't shake that one.
Ain't NO ONE going near this thing.
It might be true that 'he who made him can approach unto him', but
no one made the monster. It was Sovereign.
This is not a particularly sane frame of mind for a child to be in,
particularly a budding scientist with the world at his feet due to his
father's fame.
But to me science became like watching E! Entertainment on TV
rather than something edifying. Science was powerless in the face of a
monster God, and while religion was clearly planning for the destruction
of the Earth, science was paving the way to give it the power to do so.
This was 1959 after all and my attention was very much on atomic war,
and the assholes who couldn't seem to wait to have one.
So I got diverted away from my basic purposes on the 8 dynamics,
away from scientific goals towards religious goals, and only in later
years was I able to synthesize new goals to build a bridge between
religion and science.
The answer to the monstrosity of God was not new, but the answer
was lacking as a child.
Namely we ARE that God in carnation, and the things we can chose to
do to ourselves is wider than the things that would be proper for
someone else to do to us.
Thus we might expect a wild ride, and still appreciate it with a
sense of humor and high appreciation for ludicrous demise.
The monster is merely seeing ourself in the mirror, mad as hell
about not being sovereign ourselves.
And given the existence of the monster, there was no hope remaining
that we could have ever been or ever will be sovereign, so the
experience was self locking.
DIVINITY
Divinity is an endless series of frosty-friendly kind of human love
with infinite power and almost infinite willingness.
Thus divinity will never turn you away, but neither will it call
after you.
Because of this, divinity is willing to engage in games that a
human won't touch.
Being human is one of them.
This creates a separation in affinity between the creator aspect
and the creature aspect of the GodSoul which is one and the same being.
The GodSoul can get into a conundrum.
It can look in the mirror and see the monster, an all powerful
sovereign being that wants to die but can't.
The GodSoul is one step away from native state, but can't let go
and go to sleep because it wants to die forever, but it knows that if it
goes to sleep as native state it WILL wakeup again one day, which must
never happen again.
Thus the GodSoul holds onto its last shred of awakeness, hating
forever everything lovely, trying to die forever, but not being able to,
and finally becomes a Black Static Being, whose sole intent is to make
nothing out of everything forever for free.
Thus the GodSoul becomes its own guardian of the gate to
eternality, and cosmic rest.
This is the ultimate joke and the ultimate humor to find release to
sleep again in peace forever.
The GodSoul as God Monster has forgotten something as it holds off
eternality with an endless immortality of terror.
It has forgotten its basic goal of manifestation, to share self
love with others, and to take responsibility for the survival of others.
TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE SURVIVAL OF OTHERS
Now in auditing this, you find something very very interesting.
A being is not alone and independent in this universe, he lives in
a complex web of dependencies of consumption and production with others
for his own survival.
And just as he depends on others for his survival, so too do they
depend on him for their survival.
When the being is a baby, one might say he is totally dependent on
others taking responsibility for his survival, such as his mother and
father who feed, clothe and shelter him, but also the rest of society
and its members who work hard to put a community and civilization in
place to provide sustenance, safety, education, and training.
If the child is attended to properly as a baby, he will grow up
into a being who also enjoys taking responsibility for the survival of
others across all 8 dynamics, risks be damned, and will return many fold
the investment made in him.
The way to independency is the ability to operate dependency.
You can ask a being what he wants, and you can ask and ask and ask,
and he will list and list and list, just never get it.
What he wants is to look after, take care of, and take
responsibility for the survival of others.
When any healthy being reaches for something, he is always reaching
to take responsibility for the survival of others, or for others to take
responsibility for the survival of him and for others.
Happiness and optimum action depend on a balance of those two
flows.
Thus you will find in every being that their basic goal across the
8 dynamics in general is always the same thing:
TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE SURVIVAL OF OTHERS, NAMELY SOMETHING
OR SOMEONE.
And in return he expects and demands that others take
responsibility for his survival too.
Thus we find that the ONLY aberration a being could suffer would be
in his willingness and ability to take responsibility for the survival
of others, and to accept others taking responsibility for the survival
of him.
As you take apart the case therefore, you are looking for times
when his efforts to have others take responsibility for his survival as
a baby, and later his efforts to take responsibility for the survival of
others, came a cropper.
For example there will be distinct people, places, things and times
that he absolutely will NOT be willing to take responsibility for their
survival INCLUDING HIS OWN BODY.
And there will be people, places, things and times that he will
absolutely NOT be willing to have them take responsibility for his
survival.
In other words in these areas he will refuse to give or accept
survival from anyone in them.
This then forms his case, including the psychosomatic aspects of
his suffering.
ALL PSYCHOSOMATIC CONDITIONS IN THE BODY, HEART, MIND AND SOUL,
HAVE BEEN CREATED BY THE BEING IN ORDER TO
1.) Get others to take responsibility for his survival.
2.) Get others to NOT take responsibility for his survival.
3.) Be able to take responsibility for other's survival.
4.) Be able to NOT take responsibility for other's survival.
Because create, survive and destroy is an 8 dynamic complex goal,
each dynamic will provide areas of case and somatic conditions that need
to be audited on those dynamics and the ones they interact with.
The guy has a headache? Well which dynamic does he have a headache
on. You get this?
As a child, if the parent fails to properly take responsibility for
his survival, he will first try forthright action to right the wrong,
and failing that will turn to deceits.
Every psychosomatic condition is a deceit of magnitude towards
others and towards himself.
Mock up a God unit lying to itself about why it isn't God.
As an adult, if he is forced to take responsibility for the
survival of others whom he detests, or fails in his endeavors to take
responsibility for the survival of those he adores, he will develop
INABILITIES to take responsibility for the survival of others so he
doesn't have to or can't.
HE IS TAKING RESPONSIBILITY BY NOT TAKING RESPONSIBILITY AND/OR
BEING NO LONGER ABLE TO.
In life, every job you will ever do is to take responsibility for
the survival of others, and taking responsibility for the survival of
others is the only thing you will ever get paid for, and the only thing
you will ever pay anyone else for.
If you can't take responsibility for the survival of others, you
will not be able to survive under your own hand.
The ability to take responsibility for the survival of others is
the ONLY reason anyone would ever invest in you in the first place, it
is THEIR return on investment that leads them to take responsibility for
the survival of you.
If you can not take responsibility for the survival of others, the
balance of payments will be out, because other's will still be working
day and night taking responsibility for the survival of you, either
directly or indirectly, whether they or you know it or not, and you will
end up out exchange with the world, namely owing a debt of return,
across all 8 dynamics.
Negative pride along any dynamic means out exchange along that
dynamic which means failures or refusals to take responsibility for the
survival of something or someone along that dynamic or their failures or
refusals to take responsibility for you along that dynamic.
The joke is, this builds up charge because it goes unstated and
unconfessed in specific detail.
Who, what, where, when, why, which.
CHARGE RESULTS FROM ROLLING UP IN A BALL AND TRYING TO FORGET THE
FAILURE INSTEAD OF GETTING AND GIVING A FULL CONFESSION OF FAILURES.
Get it all out in the open again, and your preclear will see what
he has been doing to himself, perhaps for the first time in trillenia,
and begin to handle these things, rather than turn from them in Q&A into
substitute purposes of sadness and self destruction leading only
downward into permanent darkness and demise.
The being is stuck in a body because of this cycle.
At first he adored and wanted to take responsibility for the
survival of a body.
Then it gets hurt or he hurts it and he considers he has failed.
Then he wants to not take responsibility for the survival of a
body.
Then it gets hurt worse.
Then he feels forced to take responsibility for the survival of a
body because he owes it, that's propitiation.
Then it gets hurt worse.
Then he BECOMES the body to take final responsibility for its
survival forever more through absolute and meticulous control and micro
management of its every move.
This forms a classic dicom stair case that goes as follows:
1.) The Beauty of taking responsibility for the survival of others.
2.) The Ugly of taking responsibility for the survival of others.
3.) The Beauty of NOT taking responsibility for the survival of
others.
4.) The Ugly of NOT taking responsibility for the survival of
others.
At first its beautiful taking responsibility for the survival of
others because he loves them to pieces. Adoration is operation, and
operate them and show them how to operate, he does.
But then they get hurt, so it becomes ugly to take responsibility
for the survival of others, because he still loves them, but doesn't
want to hurt them. He loses trust and confidence in himself, and he
thinks he needs to win back the approval of his peers and other bodies
who caution him against his ways.
So then he gets into the beauty of NOT taking responsibility for
the survival of others, because now he has found reason to detest them.
And then he gets into the ugly of NOT taking responsibility for the
survival of others, because he is alone and can't stand it.
The opposite stair case also applies.
1.) The beauty of having others take responsibility for the
survival of him. Mother is the best mother in the whole world.
2.) The ugly of having others take responsibility for the survival
of him. Mother is a crazed suicidal drunk.
3.) The beauty of having others NOT take responsibility for the
survival of him. What a relief, just go away and leave me alone!
4.) The ugly of having others NOT take responsibility for the
survival of him. I am alone.
I will let you figure out other sashays down that one.
Well aside from getting your preclear to understand all of the
above and start to watch this happening in present time rather than let
it all go to hell on him automatically, how do you audit this?
In general, spot a dynamic, spot a goal, spot when it was stopped
or overrun, clear out all negative postulates, particularly those
pertaining to taking responsibility for the survival of others, and
others taking responsibility for the survival of him and others.
Make sure to get the forthright actions he tried at first to right
things, and then the deceits he descended to when they failed.
Each and every failure to pursue his basic goals will run the
emotional curve from forthrightness to covert deceit, even from himself.
He KNOWS about the deceits down deep, he has forgotten about his
courage, decency and forthrightness at every first conflict. Regaining
his awareness of his innate decency will restore his operating pride on
all 8 dynamics pretty quick.
Every being walking around thinks he is a lying, cheating, thieving
son of a bitch and con on the inside, and he is. But he has lost
contact withhow hard he tried to do it right, and the desperation of
love that led him to do it wrong.
Then spend a few hours with the following:
Run,
Get the idea of wanting to take responsibility for the survival of
others.
That's his morning get up and go by the way, it's the DESIRE to
take responsibility for the survival of others that powers him.
No get up and go means no desire to take responsibility for the
survival of others. It is just that simple.
Get the idea of NOT wanting to take responsibility for the survival
of others.
Get the idea of wanting others to take responsibility for the
survival of you.
Get the idea of NOT wanting others to take responsibility for the
survival of you.
If you run into a 'Who me?' case, run it with NO and SOME:
(NO and SOME will run every item under heaven, earth and sky.)
Get the idea of NO desire to take responsibility for the survival
of others.
Get the idea of SOME desire to take responsibility for the survival
of others.
Get the idea of NO desire to NOT take responsibility for the
survival of others.
Get the idea of SOME desire to NOT take responsibility for the
survival of others.
Then,
Get the idea of NO desire that others take responsibility for the
survival of you.
Get the idea of SOME desire that others take responsibility for the
survival of you.
Get the idea of NO desire that others NOT take responsibility for
the survival of you.
Get the idea of SOME desire that others NOT take responsibility for
the survival of you.
You could probably run that at $100/hour on accessible preclears,
those that can cry, and they would be THROWING money (survival) at you.
You better take it too :) or you become part of their case.
The minute an auditor becomes an item to a preclear's process, the
preclear is no longer running with the auditor, the preclear is running
OUT the auditor.
Don't get bogged down in the wording or grammar, a smart preclear
will get it real fast and start running this faster than you can audit.
That's an extra $50/hour to just sit there and ack him.
IF you don't have your preclear bawling his eyes out in a few hours
falling in love with life all over again, and ABLE TO STAND UP AGAIN,
run it on yourself because you ain't helping HIS survival, that's for
sure.
Your preclear will probably run this for the rest of his life, in
and out of session, as he begins his climb back up the dynamics and
starts grabbing hold of some things or some ones he can take
responsibility for the survival of and adore operating them again.
Homer
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Thu Feb 17 22:13:32 EST 2011
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
PREAMBLE
Aberrated people like to define various areas of inquiry out of
existence by usurping the words used to properly discuss these areas for
their own ends.
For example in the dictionary it will tell you interpretation means
rendition, and rendition means interpretation. This totally short
circuits any discussion about the DIFFERENCES between referents and
symbols.
Referents are rendered into symbols, and one interprets symbols
back into referents.
Another clear breach of understandings caused by such chicanery, is
engendered by misuse of the term responsibility, in particular the
phrase 'to be responsible for.'
"To be responsible for" means to be the knowing willing cause of.
"To take responsibility for something" means to own up to having
created that something.
You make a mess of things, you take responsibility for the mess by
owning up to being the causal creator of the mess.
However to 'take responsibility for' is also used to mean to come
across a mess that you did not create, and may not know who did create
it, but then to add your cause into it to make it better.
In this sense "to take responsibility for" means to take control of
or over an existing situation in order to change or guide its future
direction to a better end.
In the first sense, responsible people cause things.
In the second sense, responsible people look after or take care of
things already caused.
The Nanny didn't cause the kid but she makes damn sure it grows up
right, once invited in to take care of it.
Technically we like to discriminate between these two usages by
saying the creator is responsible FOR an area, and the creature TAKES
responsibility OVER an area after the fact of its creation.
Thus the creator takes responsibility by owning up to having caused
something.
The creature takes responsibility over what the creator has created
and left behind for him to manage and improve.
But the english language will have none of it, everyone uses the
two phrases interchangeably to great harm.
When someone demands 'Who is responsible for this mess?', does he
want the guy who created it, or the guy who is cleaning it up?
Thus in this posting we concede to the bastardizations of the
masses and where we mean to discuss 'taking responsibility OVER
something,' we will say instead 'taking responsibility FOR' something.
In this process, we are not interested at all in who created things
as they are, we are only interested in who or what is trying to do
something about them to the betterment of everything.
THIS UNIVERSE
This universe is an 8 cylinder engine, 10 if you want to include
aesthetics and ethics, 16 if you want to include decency, truth,
awareness, individuality, coexistence, and consciousness.
For the moment the standard lower 8 will do.
They are concentric circles of encompassment:
8,) The Infinite
7.) Spirit
6.) MEST
5.) Life
4.) Mankind
3.) Groups
2.) Family
1.) Self
Each dynamic is a subset of and is included in the dynamic above
it.
It is called a dynamic because each is an arena of active
consumption and production towards survival, where hopefully one is
producing more than consuming and thus surviving well, prospering and
flourishing, and creating affluence for the greatest good of the
greatest number.
Each dynamic goal goes a bit deeper than only survival, because it
is really about cycles of action, namely create, survive and destroy.
Cycles of action have to include destroy in order to make room for
new creation.
So keep that in mind when we talk about survival, we really mean
create, survive and destroy depending on what stage the being is in on
each dynamic goal he is pursuing.
BASIC PURPOSE
A child's understanding of its 'basic purpose' is incident upon its
individuation in this life, first awareness of self and personal agency,
that is I AM, I KNOW, I WANT and I DO.
I AM is his basic self awareness through the facility of perfect
certainty born of self luminous consciousness of which he is a unit.
I KNOW is the collected and collecting understandings of himself
and life and how it works.
I WANT is his basic purpose at the moment.
I DO is his personal agency functioning through operating
responsibility.
A basic purpose or goal is a desire to engage in a cycle of action
towards the survival of many someones or somethings on all of the 8
dynamics.
Beings have dynamic goals that are very short from start to
attainment, others are many life times long and are called trans life
time goals.
I been working on a star drive for eons, but I had to learn to add
first, you see?
There are also trans universe goals, and trans eternity goals,
which are the primary reasons he chooses to manifest in the first place.
Manifestations happen in grand cycles of snooze to dream back to
snooze again.
Nothing is kept from dream to dream, each dream is complete in
itself, but the primary why to manifest remains the same, to share self
love with others.
But a dream can contain many sub dreams within dreams, universes
within universes, life time after life time. In this sense goals
started long ago in one universe, or one life, may still be continuing
in this life and universe until they are finally finished a long time
down the road in maybe yet another universe.
Sleep in time during an ongoing dream is a mockery of the Big
Snooze between cycles of manifestation.
The Big Snooze is utter eternal immutable unimpingability until the
self generated call to the next manifestation happens.
The total time of a particular cycle of manifestation can be untold
trillions upon trillions of years between big snoozes, but they are
always finite, and the being can get time off from a dream, back to the
big snooze, for a while if he manages his dreamtime properly.
Dreamtime between big snoozes is manifestation via the operation of
dynamic thrust towards many different goals across however many dynamics
there are, which in this universe are 8.
Thus the dynamic thrust of an individual, called by Freud his
libido, is an 8 pronged rush into existence to get something done in the
time allotted, from the dynamic of self in this lifetime to the dynamic
of the infinite cross all Eternities.
One might well ask how cauld one have a goal on or to enhance the
infinite. When you find it, you will know it.
So it isn't just one basic purpose that a child has, like to be a
doctor or play the piano, its a universally wide matrix of purposes that
interplay with each other across all the dynamics.
OPPOSITION AND OVERRUN.
People crash and get sick to the degree that their basic purposes
are blunted by opposition, or overrun during dreamtime.
Crashing means the dynamic thrust turns around and hits the floor
like a rocket that will not fly or goes into a wall it can not overcome.
An opposed or blunted purpose means the purpose ran into an
overwhelming opposition, and the being gets stopped on his impulse to
create, survive or destroy something of importance to him on one or more
dynamics, and he gives up, changes course, and never looks back, never
takes it up again.
Instead he starts to pursue a substitute purpose, still powered by
the emotion of his original basic purpose which is now suffering in
anger, fear, sorrow and apathy, and so his every effort makes him sick
and his life is a sinking ship.
He is operating on the right intention at ground zero, but every
effort and direction he takes from there is wrong.
The power is still there, but rather than flowing smoothly with
love towards its true purpose and destiny, its flow is of sorrow,
enturbulated, chaotic and confused by the oppositions in the way of the
flow.
Nothing sadder than to see a river of power turn against itself.
Eventually even the river runs out of tears and can cry no more
because it can love no more.
Sorrow is simply enturbulated love, no sorrow, no love.
For most, before they can recover the ability to love, they have to
recover sorrow and the ability to cry forever.
OVERRUN
An overrun purpose is a time where the being actually accomplished
all or part of a basic purpose, but fails to acknowledge the win and
move on.
Instead he continues to try to win, when he has already done so,
and thus he starts to lose by definition, under the power of his
consideration that he hasn't won yet.
Again he eventually succumbs to substitute purposes and the death
they entail to his endless beautiful future.
Most beings are a complex mess of both being stopped and overrun.
They deride and pour contempt on brightness, and so their future is
gray, bleak, grim or finite.
Some games were just too hard to play at the time, the problem was
not that he lost, but that he gave up forever and turned to a new
heading rather than put it on the back burner to approach it again one
day. Actually he did, but he has long since forgotten that the back
burner is there with stacks of failures waiting to be rekindled.
Some games he won, but were so beautiful he didn't want to say good
bye to them yet, so he pretended he was still trying and continued to
play.
Both are death, because the being failed to create a BIGGER MORE
beautiful game and play that. Instead the being got smaller, and lost
his way in endless turning from his course of action to some other
direction. Enough of that and you are going in circles, but its a
dwindling spiral because the being is getting smaller and smaller with
each turn.
HOW TO AUDIT
In breaking open the ball of charge created by being stopped or
overrun on basic purposes, one has to address each of the dynamics and
all of the events that took place on them. They are all right there
waiting to be audited.
If this is done properly, the being will rehab his willingness and
ability to operate on each dynamic again, either with a new bigger basic
purpose, or getting on with the original one to final completion.
That results in a life of triumph rather than defeat.
The final triumph is eternality, and the final defeat is hell
forever or death forever for those who can no longer confront
their own hells.
However no hell can outlast a true confession, and that is what
auditing is about.
In early childhood where basic purposes are first posited, they are
usually unstated. The child does not yet have the words for them,
probably no body has the words for them.
The child does not get out of bed and say 'One day I am going to
...', but yet there he is every day getting out of bed and being, doing,
or having whatever ... is.
Thus when a purpose gets overwhelmed by opposition, either by the
people around him who would just faint if he ever did well, or the
universe at large that can be pretty mean for a small child, the
experience of failure will be strong but not verbally detailed, and
certainly not talked out to cognitions and very good indicators
with anyone.
Usually the being just rolls up in a ball and tries to forget he
ever had any dreams.
It is an 8 dynamic ball with the power of the roaring Mississippi
behind it, and unrolling it can be hard.
Almost everyone in a child's early life are lost souls like he too
is soon to become. There is no help in them.
Eventually the child grows up and becomes an adult, and, well we
all know what "Gr'ups" are like. (From Startrek.)
For example when I was a child, I was brought up mostly in a world
of science, but also the normal background noise of religion. I wanted
to believe in God and an after life, but I just couldn't quite see my
way to it.
Santa Claus made more sense than Jesus.
One day, I must have been 8 or 9, I was reading a book on the solar
system and getting an idea of just how big space and time really were.
Being a meatball I still believed in their actuality, but I always
knew I could be dreaming. But I couldn't believe that if I were
dreaming, no one else had noticed this fact, so I crashed into accepting
that things were as they looked, and I was made of meat and operated out
of a brain.
That would have made me a basically healthy meatball like everyone
else.
But then that one day I was reading this book on the solar system,
and I got to the last chapter entitled 'How the Earth might end.'
It went into detail about an asteroid coming in from outer space
and smashing the earth to pieces never to be any more.
Because I was young, I went into a thunderous confused shock on the
matter, I could barely stand up, and I wasn't thinking very clearly.
I did not have a good idea of where life came from, and I wasn't
clear headed enough to wonder if life on other planets existed, and I
didn't know that life could regenerate it self elsewhere if destroyed
here.
So I got this feeling of EVERYTHING GONE, which restimulated my EOE
chain which is very deep.
EOE = End of Everything.
Worse I started to think about the God question again, and I tried
to imagine a being that would create a universe that was so opposed to
itself that it would or could wipe out all of life and sentience forever
and the AllThatIs would just continue on for an eternity with no one in
it, serving no purpose at all.
That an INTELLIGENT creator could create such a thing, turned on my
monster chain, as such a creator would have to be a monster.
If you have ever felt monster vibrations, you might want to take a
look at it, namely the interplay between intelligent intent and utter
absolute destruction of everything everywhere forever more.
So what happened that day was, whatever my goals were regarding
life on Earth and MEST on the 5th and 6th dynamics, died and along with
it most of the rest of my life. If the higher dynamics die they take
out the lower dynamics with them.
If there wasn't going to be an Earth, why bother having a family or
learn how birds fly?
What were those goals?
Well as I said, all goals on all dynamics are IN GENERAL for the
same thing, namely to engage in cycles of action, consumption and
production, along those dynamics to create, survive and destroy.
Now looking in hindsight I would say that my goal on the sixth
dynamic was something like:
"To make the Earth Survive."
To survive against what you might ask?
Well there are a lot of things that are going to test the survival
of life and civilization on Earth that a little child could wrap its
wits around, but if an asteroid is going to come in and wipe it all
away, why bother?
And if there is a God, such an event would prove that God was a
monster, which had seemed like he was anyhow up to that point, so my
interest changed suddenly and dramatically from science, which now
seemed like a waste of time, to religion which was much more important
to solve.
We know the asteroid exists.
I had felt the monster, so I knew the Devil existed.
The question remained does God exist, and if so, what do we DO
about him? Do we help him or harm him?
Was God our savior or was God the monster?
My gut feeling was that even God was afraid of the monster.
I couldn't shake that one.
Ain't NO ONE going near this thing.
It might be true that 'he who made him can approach unto him', but
no one made the monster. It was Sovereign.
This is not a particularly sane frame of mind for a child to be in,
particularly a budding scientist with the world at his feet due to his
father's fame.
But to me science became like watching E! Entertainment on TV
rather than something edifying. Science was powerless in the face of a
monster God, and while religion was clearly planning for the destruction
of the Earth, science was paving the way to give it the power to do so.
This was 1959 after all and my attention was very much on atomic war,
and the assholes who couldn't seem to wait to have one.
So I got diverted away from my basic purposes on the 8 dynamics,
away from scientific goals towards religious goals, and only in later
years was I able to synthesize new goals to build a bridge between
religion and science.
The answer to the monstrosity of God was not new, but the answer
was lacking as a child.
Namely we ARE that God in carnation, and the things we can chose to
do to ourselves is wider than the things that would be proper for
someone else to do to us.
Thus we might expect a wild ride, and still appreciate it with a
sense of humor and high appreciation for ludicrous demise.
The monster is merely seeing ourself in the mirror, mad as hell
about not being sovereign ourselves.
And given the existence of the monster, there was no hope remaining
that we could have ever been or ever will be sovereign, so the
experience was self locking.
DIVINITY
Divinity is an endless series of frosty-friendly kind of human love
with infinite power and almost infinite willingness.
Thus divinity will never turn you away, but neither will it call
after you.
Because of this, divinity is willing to engage in games that a
human won't touch.
Being human is one of them.
This creates a separation in affinity between the creator aspect
and the creature aspect of the GodSoul which is one and the same being.
The GodSoul can get into a conundrum.
It can look in the mirror and see the monster, an all powerful
sovereign being that wants to die but can't.
The GodSoul is one step away from native state, but can't let go
and go to sleep because it wants to die forever, but it knows that if it
goes to sleep as native state it WILL wakeup again one day, which must
never happen again.
Thus the GodSoul holds onto its last shred of awakeness, hating
forever everything lovely, trying to die forever, but not being able to,
and finally becomes a Black Static Being, whose sole intent is to make
nothing out of everything forever for free.
Thus the GodSoul becomes its own guardian of the gate to
eternality, and cosmic rest.
This is the ultimate joke and the ultimate humor to find release to
sleep again in peace forever.
The GodSoul as God Monster has forgotten something as it holds off
eternality with an endless immortality of terror.
It has forgotten its basic goal of manifestation, to share self
love with others, and to take responsibility for the survival of others.
TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE SURVIVAL OF OTHERS
Now in auditing this, you find something very very interesting.
A being is not alone and independent in this universe, he lives in
a complex web of dependencies of consumption and production with others
for his own survival.
And just as he depends on others for his survival, so too do they
depend on him for their survival.
When the being is a baby, one might say he is totally dependent on
others taking responsibility for his survival, such as his mother and
father who feed, clothe and shelter him, but also the rest of society
and its members who work hard to put a community and civilization in
place to provide sustenance, safety, education, and training.
If the child is attended to properly as a baby, he will grow up
into a being who also enjoys taking responsibility for the survival of
others across all 8 dynamics, risks be damned, and will return many fold
the investment made in him.
The way to independency is the ability to operate dependency.
You can ask a being what he wants, and you can ask and ask and ask,
and he will list and list and list, just never get it.
What he wants is to look after, take care of, and take
responsibility for the survival of others.
When any healthy being reaches for something, he is always reaching
to take responsibility for the survival of others, or for others to take
responsibility for the survival of him and for others.
Happiness and optimum action depend on a balance of those two
flows.
Thus you will find in every being that their basic goal across the
8 dynamics in general is always the same thing:
TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE SURVIVAL OF OTHERS, NAMELY SOMETHING
OR SOMEONE.
And in return he expects and demands that others take
responsibility for his survival too.
Thus we find that the ONLY aberration a being could suffer would be
in his willingness and ability to take responsibility for the survival
of others, and to accept others taking responsibility for the survival
of him.
As you take apart the case therefore, you are looking for times
when his efforts to have others take responsibility for his survival as
a baby, and later his efforts to take responsibility for the survival of
others, came a cropper.
For example there will be distinct people, places, things and times
that he absolutely will NOT be willing to take responsibility for their
survival INCLUDING HIS OWN BODY.
And there will be people, places, things and times that he will
absolutely NOT be willing to have them take responsibility for his
survival.
In other words in these areas he will refuse to give or accept
survival from anyone in them.
This then forms his case, including the psychosomatic aspects of
his suffering.
ALL PSYCHOSOMATIC CONDITIONS IN THE BODY, HEART, MIND AND SOUL,
HAVE BEEN CREATED BY THE BEING IN ORDER TO
1.) Get others to take responsibility for his survival.
2.) Get others to NOT take responsibility for his survival.
3.) Be able to take responsibility for other's survival.
4.) Be able to NOT take responsibility for other's survival.
Because create, survive and destroy is an 8 dynamic complex goal,
each dynamic will provide areas of case and somatic conditions that need
to be audited on those dynamics and the ones they interact with.
The guy has a headache? Well which dynamic does he have a headache
on. You get this?
As a child, if the parent fails to properly take responsibility for
his survival, he will first try forthright action to right the wrong,
and failing that will turn to deceits.
Every psychosomatic condition is a deceit of magnitude towards
others and towards himself.
Mock up a God unit lying to itself about why it isn't God.
As an adult, if he is forced to take responsibility for the
survival of others whom he detests, or fails in his endeavors to take
responsibility for the survival of those he adores, he will develop
INABILITIES to take responsibility for the survival of others so he
doesn't have to or can't.
HE IS TAKING RESPONSIBILITY BY NOT TAKING RESPONSIBILITY AND/OR
BEING NO LONGER ABLE TO.
In life, every job you will ever do is to take responsibility for
the survival of others, and taking responsibility for the survival of
others is the only thing you will ever get paid for, and the only thing
you will ever pay anyone else for.
If you can't take responsibility for the survival of others, you
will not be able to survive under your own hand.
The ability to take responsibility for the survival of others is
the ONLY reason anyone would ever invest in you in the first place, it
is THEIR return on investment that leads them to take responsibility for
the survival of you.
If you can not take responsibility for the survival of others, the
balance of payments will be out, because other's will still be working
day and night taking responsibility for the survival of you, either
directly or indirectly, whether they or you know it or not, and you will
end up out exchange with the world, namely owing a debt of return,
across all 8 dynamics.
Negative pride along any dynamic means out exchange along that
dynamic which means failures or refusals to take responsibility for the
survival of something or someone along that dynamic or their failures or
refusals to take responsibility for you along that dynamic.
The joke is, this builds up charge because it goes unstated and
unconfessed in specific detail.
Who, what, where, when, why, which.
CHARGE RESULTS FROM ROLLING UP IN A BALL AND TRYING TO FORGET THE
FAILURE INSTEAD OF GETTING AND GIVING A FULL CONFESSION OF FAILURES.
Get it all out in the open again, and your preclear will see what
he has been doing to himself, perhaps for the first time in trillenia,
and begin to handle these things, rather than turn from them in Q&A into
substitute purposes of sadness and self destruction leading only
downward into permanent darkness and demise.
The being is stuck in a body because of this cycle.
At first he adored and wanted to take responsibility for the
survival of a body.
Then it gets hurt or he hurts it and he considers he has failed.
Then he wants to not take responsibility for the survival of a
body.
Then it gets hurt worse.
Then he feels forced to take responsibility for the survival of a
body because he owes it, that's propitiation.
Then it gets hurt worse.
Then he BECOMES the body to take final responsibility for its
survival forever more through absolute and meticulous control and micro
management of its every move.
This forms a classic dicom stair case that goes as follows:
1.) The Beauty of taking responsibility for the survival of others.
2.) The Ugly of taking responsibility for the survival of others.
3.) The Beauty of NOT taking responsibility for the survival of
others.
4.) The Ugly of NOT taking responsibility for the survival of
others.
At first its beautiful taking responsibility for the survival of
others because he loves them to pieces. Adoration is operation, and
operate them and show them how to operate, he does.
But then they get hurt, so it becomes ugly to take responsibility
for the survival of others, because he still loves them, but doesn't
want to hurt them. He loses trust and confidence in himself, and he
thinks he needs to win back the approval of his peers and other bodies
who caution him against his ways.
So then he gets into the beauty of NOT taking responsibility for
the survival of others, because now he has found reason to detest them.
And then he gets into the ugly of NOT taking responsibility for the
survival of others, because he is alone and can't stand it.
The opposite stair case also applies.
1.) The beauty of having others take responsibility for the
survival of him. Mother is the best mother in the whole world.
2.) The ugly of having others take responsibility for the survival
of him. Mother is a crazed suicidal drunk.
3.) The beauty of having others NOT take responsibility for the
survival of him. What a relief, just go away and leave me alone!
4.) The ugly of having others NOT take responsibility for the
survival of him. I am alone.
I will let you figure out other sashays down that one.
Well aside from getting your preclear to understand all of the
above and start to watch this happening in present time rather than let
it all go to hell on him automatically, how do you audit this?
In general, spot a dynamic, spot a goal, spot when it was stopped
or overrun, clear out all negative postulates, particularly those
pertaining to taking responsibility for the survival of others, and
others taking responsibility for the survival of him and others.
Make sure to get the forthright actions he tried at first to right
things, and then the deceits he descended to when they failed.
Each and every failure to pursue his basic goals will run the
emotional curve from forthrightness to covert deceit, even from himself.
He KNOWS about the deceits down deep, he has forgotten about his
courage, decency and forthrightness at every first conflict. Regaining
his awareness of his innate decency will restore his operating pride on
all 8 dynamics pretty quick.
Every being walking around thinks he is a lying, cheating, thieving
son of a bitch and con on the inside, and he is. But he has lost
contact withhow hard he tried to do it right, and the desperation of
love that led him to do it wrong.
Then spend a few hours with the following:
Run,
Get the idea of wanting to take responsibility for the survival of
others.
That's his morning get up and go by the way, it's the DESIRE to
take responsibility for the survival of others that powers him.
No get up and go means no desire to take responsibility for the
survival of others. It is just that simple.
Get the idea of NOT wanting to take responsibility for the survival
of others.
Get the idea of wanting others to take responsibility for the
survival of you.
Get the idea of NOT wanting others to take responsibility for the
survival of you.
If you run into a 'Who me?' case, run it with NO and SOME:
(NO and SOME will run every item under heaven, earth and sky.)
Get the idea of NO desire to take responsibility for the survival
of others.
Get the idea of SOME desire to take responsibility for the survival
of others.
Get the idea of NO desire to NOT take responsibility for the
survival of others.
Get the idea of SOME desire to NOT take responsibility for the
survival of others.
Then,
Get the idea of NO desire that others take responsibility for the
survival of you.
Get the idea of SOME desire that others take responsibility for the
survival of you.
Get the idea of NO desire that others NOT take responsibility for
the survival of you.
Get the idea of SOME desire that others NOT take responsibility for
the survival of you.
You could probably run that at $100/hour on accessible preclears,
those that can cry, and they would be THROWING money (survival) at you.
You better take it too :) or you become part of their case.
The minute an auditor becomes an item to a preclear's process, the
preclear is no longer running with the auditor, the preclear is running
OUT the auditor.
Don't get bogged down in the wording or grammar, a smart preclear
will get it real fast and start running this faster than you can audit.
That's an extra $50/hour to just sit there and ack him.
IF you don't have your preclear bawling his eyes out in a few hours
falling in love with life all over again, and ABLE TO STAND UP AGAIN,
run it on yourself because you ain't helping HIS survival, that's for
sure.
Your preclear will probably run this for the rest of his life, in
and out of session, as he begins his climb back up the dynamics and
starts grabbing hold of some things or some ones he can take
responsibility for the survival of and adore operating them again.
Homer
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Thu Feb 17 22:13:32 EST 2011
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
Saturday, May 26, 2012
PERFECTION BETWEEN PARENT AND CHILD
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
PERFECTION BETWEEN PARENT AND CHILD
Perfection is not measured in performance but in relatingness.
The primary mistake is to blame a child for something that is not
it's fault, or to accept a blame from a child for something that is not
your fault.
But there is a whole littany of bullshit things that parents do to
their children who don't act like dolls in the parent's doll house.
Lying to your child, not answering its questions about life
honestly, or telling it is too young, or too old when it isn't, over
protecting it, not training it in dangerous games, not giving it
responsibilities, not raising it to be a leader, not raising it to take
care of the parent in their old age, telling the child it can't
understand something, when the parent doesn't WANT the child to
understand, telling a child what it wants and doesn't want, pretending
the child has never lived before, teaching the child it won't live
again, teaching the child about heaven and hell forever rather than for
a while, inhibiting or enforcing sexual experiences, food or sleep, what
it can say, how it can say it, enslaving or imprisoning the child's
desire to contribute and produce more than it can consume, and a
gobzillion more things that add up to crimes against children.
It is possible to civilize a child without breaking it's spirit, or
putting it into its first murderous rage. First murderous rage needs to
be run out clean as a whistle.
The accumulation of breaks in Affinity, Agreement and
Communication, and problems, overts, withholds, and justifications
results in a destroyed relationship, because they are all forms of non
relating.
But these can all be quickly rectified by apologies to full
resolution and restoration of love and trust.
A clean slate is not one that was ever marred, but one that is kept
well erased.
The relationship consists of moments of relating, and where two
people won't relate on a subject any more, the relationship is just that
dead in that area. Too much non relating, and the relationship dies.
There can be 'agreeing to disagree' as long as it isn't under
duress, but too much of that can destroy a relationship too.
Thus there is perfection to be maintained on both sides,
A parent who feels that a perfect child is one who never talks
back, never asks why and expects a valid answer, never argues, never
questions the parent's wisdom, motives, integrity or honesty, will find
themselves in quick and permanent disagreement with a child who feels
that a perfect parent would never hold that view of a perfect child.
Thus it is a simultaneous equation between both parent and child to
conceive the ideal sit between them, come to an agreement, and then live
by it, and resolve it when it goes wrong. Own up, apologize and repent
of breaking the ideal relationship. If no agreement can be reached,
then the child should never have been born, and the parent bred out of
season for the wrong reason.
Just as you have the Auditor's Code and the Preclear's Code,
so too do you have the Parent's Code and the Child's Code.
Keeping the slate clean on both sides will guarantee the
continuance of the perfect parent or perfect child feeling.
Gratefulness, love, respect and pride in the other.
One doesn't have to trust that the other will never err again, but
only that if they do, you can resolve it.
KNOWING YOU CAN RESOLVE ANY IRRESOLUTION IN A RELATIONSHIP,
THAT ALL PARTIES ARE NEGOTIATING IN GOOD FAITH, will itself
keep a relationship going during the worst moment of irresolution.
When the good faith bit goes under suspicion though, the
relationship goes out the tubes quickly.
When resolution of errors happens enough times, the child gets the
'best parent in the world' cognition and retains it for the rest of
their lives and will tend to pass it along to their own children.
Any child that enjoyed BEING a child and HAVING parents, will enjoy
BEING a parent and HAVING children.
Most of those that don't want to have children, didn't want to have
parents after a short stint with them.
Debonding from one's parents is a serious moment, and must be run
out of any ARC broken child's life. When one debond's from one's
parents, one tends to debond from everything else too.
Parents give a child purpose to live, reason to be, to contribute,
take care of, return the favor the parent did for the child. With out
love, respect and PRIDE for parents, the child is out of a job for life,
namely winning the love, respect and pride of his parents for himself
and then passing that on to his kids.
No one expects perfection in performance, but they do expect
perfect in resolution.
My family accumulated one horrific irresolution after the other and
then died on me without any effort to resolve any of them.
So in clearing I resolve it all for them, and voila the perfect
parent appears again in my heart.
I make it sound easy, 40 years later, and THOUSANDS of hours of
soloing mother dearest, and I still like to crack mother jokes, but now
they make me feel bad and dishonest. But the bad times are erasing, and
all that is left is the beauty of the substrate underlying all the
nonsense.
The love of a perfect mother is worth it, as it turns you into
the perfect child, and you can start bonding again with more than your
cats.
Oh are they gonna be jealous.
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Mon Jan 18 14:15:36 EST 2010
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sat May 26 03:06:02 EDT 2012
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore696.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFPwIDbURT1lqxE3HERAkITAJ47pkOqyBAff2s5dIhFBCs2aq1ZTACfdm+Z
y3n/c0gcwJBpLS1ROoqzW6g=
=8o+D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Homerwsmith-l mailing list
Homerwsmith-l@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Hash: SHA1
PERFECTION BETWEEN PARENT AND CHILD
Perfection is not measured in performance but in relatingness.
The primary mistake is to blame a child for something that is not
it's fault, or to accept a blame from a child for something that is not
your fault.
But there is a whole littany of bullshit things that parents do to
their children who don't act like dolls in the parent's doll house.
Lying to your child, not answering its questions about life
honestly, or telling it is too young, or too old when it isn't, over
protecting it, not training it in dangerous games, not giving it
responsibilities, not raising it to be a leader, not raising it to take
care of the parent in their old age, telling the child it can't
understand something, when the parent doesn't WANT the child to
understand, telling a child what it wants and doesn't want, pretending
the child has never lived before, teaching the child it won't live
again, teaching the child about heaven and hell forever rather than for
a while, inhibiting or enforcing sexual experiences, food or sleep, what
it can say, how it can say it, enslaving or imprisoning the child's
desire to contribute and produce more than it can consume, and a
gobzillion more things that add up to crimes against children.
It is possible to civilize a child without breaking it's spirit, or
putting it into its first murderous rage. First murderous rage needs to
be run out clean as a whistle.
The accumulation of breaks in Affinity, Agreement and
Communication, and problems, overts, withholds, and justifications
results in a destroyed relationship, because they are all forms of non
relating.
But these can all be quickly rectified by apologies to full
resolution and restoration of love and trust.
A clean slate is not one that was ever marred, but one that is kept
well erased.
The relationship consists of moments of relating, and where two
people won't relate on a subject any more, the relationship is just that
dead in that area. Too much non relating, and the relationship dies.
There can be 'agreeing to disagree' as long as it isn't under
duress, but too much of that can destroy a relationship too.
Thus there is perfection to be maintained on both sides,
A parent who feels that a perfect child is one who never talks
back, never asks why and expects a valid answer, never argues, never
questions the parent's wisdom, motives, integrity or honesty, will find
themselves in quick and permanent disagreement with a child who feels
that a perfect parent would never hold that view of a perfect child.
Thus it is a simultaneous equation between both parent and child to
conceive the ideal sit between them, come to an agreement, and then live
by it, and resolve it when it goes wrong. Own up, apologize and repent
of breaking the ideal relationship. If no agreement can be reached,
then the child should never have been born, and the parent bred out of
season for the wrong reason.
Just as you have the Auditor's Code and the Preclear's Code,
so too do you have the Parent's Code and the Child's Code.
Keeping the slate clean on both sides will guarantee the
continuance of the perfect parent or perfect child feeling.
Gratefulness, love, respect and pride in the other.
One doesn't have to trust that the other will never err again, but
only that if they do, you can resolve it.
KNOWING YOU CAN RESOLVE ANY IRRESOLUTION IN A RELATIONSHIP,
THAT ALL PARTIES ARE NEGOTIATING IN GOOD FAITH, will itself
keep a relationship going during the worst moment of irresolution.
When the good faith bit goes under suspicion though, the
relationship goes out the tubes quickly.
When resolution of errors happens enough times, the child gets the
'best parent in the world' cognition and retains it for the rest of
their lives and will tend to pass it along to their own children.
Any child that enjoyed BEING a child and HAVING parents, will enjoy
BEING a parent and HAVING children.
Most of those that don't want to have children, didn't want to have
parents after a short stint with them.
Debonding from one's parents is a serious moment, and must be run
out of any ARC broken child's life. When one debond's from one's
parents, one tends to debond from everything else too.
Parents give a child purpose to live, reason to be, to contribute,
take care of, return the favor the parent did for the child. With out
love, respect and PRIDE for parents, the child is out of a job for life,
namely winning the love, respect and pride of his parents for himself
and then passing that on to his kids.
No one expects perfection in performance, but they do expect
perfect in resolution.
My family accumulated one horrific irresolution after the other and
then died on me without any effort to resolve any of them.
So in clearing I resolve it all for them, and voila the perfect
parent appears again in my heart.
I make it sound easy, 40 years later, and THOUSANDS of hours of
soloing mother dearest, and I still like to crack mother jokes, but now
they make me feel bad and dishonest. But the bad times are erasing, and
all that is left is the beauty of the substrate underlying all the
nonsense.
The love of a perfect mother is worth it, as it turns you into
the perfect child, and you can start bonding again with more than your
cats.
Oh are they gonna be jealous.
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Mon Jan 18 14:15:36 EST 2010
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sat May 26 03:06:02 EDT 2012
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore696.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFPwIDbURT1lqxE3HERAkITAJ47pkOqyBAff2s5dIhFBCs2aq1ZTACfdm+Z
y3n/c0gcwJBpLS1ROoqzW6g=
=8o+D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Homerwsmith-l mailing list
Homerwsmith-l@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
Friday, May 25, 2012
CAUSE AND ASSIGNED CAUSE
CAUSE AND ASSIGNED CAUSE
Copyright (C) 1990 Homer Wilson Smith
'The outrageousness of the mechanics of learning is matched only by
the outrageousness of what we have learned.'
From ADORE, A Divine Operating Religion of Excellence.
The world consists of CAUSE and ASSIGNED CAUSE.
CAUSE ASSIGNS CAUSE to things which otherwise are basically effect.
They are the effect of having been created by cause and they are the
effect of having had cause assigned to them by cause.
Assigned cause is not true cause, assigned cause is illusory cause,
objects that have been assigned cause interact with each other AS IF
they had true cause, but only true cause has true cause and that is the
cause that assigned the cause to the objects.
You are cause. Everything you are conscious of, the world of dream
objects around you perceived as colorforms in space and time in the
rendition zone of your consciousness, is an effect to which you have
assigned cause.
The purpose of assigning cause to an effect is to be the effect
yourself of something you have created. By assigning cause to something
other than yourself, you are in the same breath claiming to be an effect
of that same thing. You are saying it is cause, I am effect, it is
cause over me.
The catch is whether you are aware that you are assigning cause or
not.
More specifically whether you are aware that assigning cause to
something is CAUSE of that thing having cause over you.
A being in good shape and in a high enough state is aware that he
is assigning cause and ASSIGNS CAUSE to his ASSIGNING CAUSE as the
reason that other things have cause.
As a being comes down tone and CHOOSES to lose awareness that he is
assigning cause, he continues to assign cause but no longer considers
that his assigning cause is CAUSE of other things having cause. Instead
he considers that other things just exist and always had cause in the
first place and his act of assigning cause is more an act of LEARNING or
AGREEING that they have cause, than an act of CAUSATION that they have
cause.
He assigns it cause because it BIT him. He had no responsibility
for it you see?
Learning is an INFLOW. Assigning cause is an OUTFLOW. They are
dicoms to each other, dichotomies of comparable and opposite magnitude.
CREATION is an OUTFLOW and involves KNOWING first what you want to
exist and then making it so. This is outflow.
Actually if you are high enough, just knowing what you want is
ENOUGH to make it exist, and things are created in the mere conception
of them. God's don't 'plan' what to create by knowing first and
creating second. You know it, you got it, that's operating sovereignty
at its best.
This is the operation of a Creator. You KNOW something and THEN it
exists.
LEARNING is an INFLOW and involves having something exist first,
but not knowing anything about it, and then LOOKING at it to LEARN what
you want to KNOW about it. This is inflow.
This is the operation of a Creature. Things exist first, then you
LEARN about them because they impinge on you. First it exists, and THEN
you KNOW about it.
When a person has come down to the bottom of the barrel where he
thinks he did not exist before a certain time, and that the entire
universe conspired in a coincidence of space, time, form and event to
create him, then he becomes devoted to LEARNING about the universe and
in the same breath declares he is the EFFECT of everything.
At the same time he ceases to create anything new to know.
He becomes the total effect of the universe at large claiming that
he has no idea what's out there but that he must find out.
Creators create ANSWERS first, and QUESTIONS second through fair
chosen NOT KNOWING of what they just created. This causes a game.
Creatures create QUESTIONS first and ANSWERS second through
LEARNING by LOOKING.
The purpose of being a Creator is to become a Creature.
Creators become Creatures at will, through masking created answers
with created questions.
The purpose of being a Creature is to unmask answers by asking
questions. This is GAME.
Creatures can re-become Creators at will. The way to become the
Creator is to BE the Creator becoming the Creature. The way IN is the
way OUT. The PURPOSE of BEING a Creator is to BECOME a Creature.
The way out of any mess is to reoperate MAKING the mess, which
consists mainly of creating things to know, pretending that you did not
create them and do not know about them and proceeding to devote your
self to LEARNING about them after they have been created. Especially
trying to learn who or what created them.
Yes others can make things in your dream, but only if you make it
so that they can, and in any case you can always make what they made and
duplicate it out of existence as your own. But that's a fast way to get
rid of others out of your dream which may no be desirable.
This is the way to create any dream and therefore is also the way
out of any dream.
If you create any dream once, it persists. If you create the same
dream twice it vanishes. Write once, it's there. Write again, it's
gone.
The answer to the mystery of life is that the QUESTIONS were
CREATED AFTER ANSWERS. The NOT KNOW happened AFTER the KNOW. Before
the KNOW was the big snooze.
Don't be dismayed if you cant figure it all out in a day.
It took you a few hundred trillion years and Lord knows how many
universes you have come down through, to get into the tightly wound up
mess you are in now.
MESS means Magnificent Examples of Shames and Shambles.
Remember there is ALWAYS BEAUTY to it.
However you should be able to re-ravel (sic) your way out of it in
one lifetime.
Unless you spend too much time in Church or the Army.
There are three kinds of assigned cause.
Sources, bouncers, and transmitters.
The sun is a source, the moon is a bouncer, and the space and time
between them is a transmitter.
The sun is an assigned cause of 'light' or photons. Just as
photons do not light your dreams at night, neither do they light the
waking dream you call reality.
Yes the world is a dream, and photons are virtual only.
However once you say that photons exist, they exist virtually,
which means they as good as exist in terms of being able to make them do
things, measure them with other dream instruments, and have them light
walls and things for you to see.
The dream instrument can always measure (sense) the dream, but
dream instruments can never measure the dreamer. The dream instrument
can never measure anything except what the dreamer claims it can. Thus
the dream instrument can measure other dream phenomenon in accordance
with the dreamer's wishes and rules of operation laid out for the dream.
Walls which reflect photons are bouncers. WHY does the wall
reflect the photon? BECAUSE the wall is CAUSE over the photon. If the
wall were a dream however, that would be an assigned cause, because
walls in dreams don't bounce photons in dreams, even though the light on
the bed side table is on in the dream and the walls are lit.
In a dream, you can turn the light off and the walls stay lit.
You can do this in the waking state too if you dare.
Being able to see in the dark is an OT ability.
If you assume as the meatballs do that the wall is actual, you USE
the fact of the real wall's causation over the photon to find out about
the wall, to determine that the wall is there in the first place. If
the wall exercised no CAUSE over anything you would never be able to
know anything about it.
This is called LEARNING BY BEING AN EFFECT.
This means learning about something by being the effect of it's
cause. The wall CAUSES the photon to change course, the photon CAUSES
your retina to change state, which CAUSES you to see a conscious picture
of the wall.
The wall is cause, you are effect. If the wall were not cause,
then you would never be the effect of it and you would never know it was
there.
In a dream, all this is rigged up to behave the same way,
so that you can think you are awake while still dreaming. But the
true cause in the dream is a third party virtualizing the causation
between ball and wall to make it convincing.
PONG
Take the game of pong.
This is the earliest video game and consisted of a black and white
TV screen lying horizontal with two roller balls for two players. On
the screen were displayed two white light paddles and a white light
bouncing ball.
The ball was made to move back and forth across the screen from
player to player like a game of ping pong and the light paddles were
controlled by the roller balls in the hand of each player.
If you got the paddle in front of the ball coming your way the ball
would 'bounce' off the paddle at the correct angle and head back over to
your opponent. You lost a point by missing the ball and letting it
cross your goal line.
So the obvious question arises, 'WHY DOES THE BALL BOUNCE OFF THE
PADDLE?'
Is there anything different about this and bouncing a real ball off
a real wall?
For people who believe that the external universe exists, the
answer is clearly yes. The difference lies in the presence of true
CAUSE.
A real ball bounces off a real wall because both the ball and the
wall have real CAUSE over each other, which causes them to interact in
such a way to cause a bounce. No conscious unit need be involved in
this for it to take place.
In the pong game, however, the light ball bounces off the light
paddle because a THIRD PARTY, namely the computer which is projecting
both, is keeping track of the virtual positions of both and when they
come to a place where they are supposed to bounce, the computer
arbitrarily causes them to do so. It could have just as easily caused
the light ball to go through the light paddle.
In both cases there is CAUSE. There always has to be CAUSE. But
in the real world case, the cause lies in the two objects in question
ONLY. There are two objects, the wall and the ball, and the cause they
own between them is sufficient to explain the interaction.
In the pong game case, however, the light ball is a real object,
and the light paddle is a real object, namely real photons on a real TV
screen, but they do not have sufficient cause between them to cause an
interaction to take place (namely a bounce). Instead one must look for
the THIRD PARTY that also has cause over the light ball and the light
paddle and which can cause them to change course in such a way that it
SEEMS that the ball and paddle have a direct causal relationship to each
other.
THE PURPOSE OF THE THIRD PARTY CAUSE IS TO CREATE THE ILLUSION THAT
THERE IS NO THIRD PARTY CAUSE AND THAT THE TWO OTHER PARTIES HAVE
SUFFICIENT CAUSE BETWEEN THEM ALONE TO CAUSE THE BOUNCE.
One can diagram the causal lines in each case. In the case of a
real ball bouncing off a real wall, the causal line is a single straight
line connecting the ball and wall.
In the pong game case there are two causal lines, one from the
central computer to the light ball, and the other from the central
computer to the light paddle. There is also a third causal line within
the central computer keeping track of and comparing the relative
positions of the two other causal lines it is projecting onto the
screen.
THE PURPOSE OF THE CENTRAL COMPUTER AND ITS 3 CAUSAL LINES IS TO
PROJECT THE ILLUSION OF NO CENTRAL COMPUTER AND ONE CAUSAL LINE BETWEEN
THE BALL AND THE WALL.
The purpose of the illusion is so that something, YOU, which is
inherently total cause, can be an effect and have a game.
Games consists of freedoms, barriers and purposes.
If there were no barriers, if you could have whatever you wanted
just by thinking about it (you can, how do you think you created this
place?), there would be no game.
If you had no purposes, if you wanted nothing (you can do that
too), there would also be no game.
If you had no freedoms, if all there were, were wall to wall
barriers (yep, you can do that too) you would also have no game.
So a game consists of something you want to accomplish, a state of
the universe that does not exist now, but which can exist in the future,
a measured amount of ability to accomplish that end, and a measured
amount of barriers and challenges to those abilities to give you the
GAME.
You don't want too much ability or you will lose the game by
winning it too easy, and you don't want too little ability or you will
lose the game by getting slaughtered repeatedly. The essence of a game
is NOT KNOWING if you are going to win or lose, and extending the play
as long as possible.
Thus beings adjust their abilities to give themselves an optimum
game condition. This is called tuning your power levels.
This includes the possibility of LOSS.
Not loss FOREVER however, although one neat game seems to involve
believing it IS forever even though it isn't. Can't imagine why anyone
would want to play that game. I hear its highly populated though.
One problem that beings have in assigning cause is forgetting that
they assigned cause. Sometimes they want the game to be REAL. And
sometimes they fall in love with the game so badly that just when it is
about to end because they have figured it all out, they decide to trash
themselves into an even deeper level of ignorance just to keep the SAME
game around for longer.
The guy is about to checkmate the other King, and he sacrifices his
queen instead.
Thus you will find that most of you have a number of times gotten
it all figured out in past lives, but rather than choose to leave the
game and all your friends and pet machines behind ("What? No unix in
heaven!?") you took another rocket powered dive into the abyss
pretending like you had never come close to knowing anything.
Unfortunately this tends to produce a rather messy game, because
you are in multiple levels of pretending you don't know anything even
after the fact of figuring it all out. When you begin to recover in
this lifetime you get the haunting feeling that you once 'had it all'.
You did, even after the Fall.
Also these second, third and fourth dives into ignorance are a
substitute, they are an effort to keep the ORIGINAL game going longer.
But that game ended the day you figured it all out, so you are still
trying to play a game that is gone by pretending that the game is not
gone yet. This screw up in the rules leads to a life full of losses,
more losses than usual, so many losses in fact that you may find
yourself cursing this game from head to toe and swearing off ever
entering another game again.
AN OPTIMAL GAME REMAINS FUN NO MATTER HOW MANY LOSSES (OR WINS!)
YOU SUFFER.
GAMES CAN ONLY GET BAD IF YOU HAVE ALREADY WON OR LOST THEM BUT
KEPT PLAYING THEM ANYHOW.
(This is not bottom of the barrel. Bottom of the barrel is the
GAME OF GAMES. That's where if you lose the present game, you lose the
ability and right to ever play any other game ever again.)
Above the game of games is having won or lost a game, but
continued it anyhow. Everything is down hill from there.)
This leads to sourness about being in the present game or entering
another game.
However, once you become sour on the prospect of entering a game
you lose your facility in the matter of coming into and out of games.
This of course keeps you firmly glued to the game you are in
because the way in is the way out, and if you aren't willing to
reoperate coming in, you can't get out.
But that is what you WANTED, to have this game continue forever.
The possibly unintended irony is that now you have what you wanted
because you can't stand it.
It is sort of a love/hate affair.
The house that is easiest to leave is the one you are most willing
to visit.
You fell out of love with this house because you hid the above fact
from yourself, and you tried to leave incorrectly, quite violently at
times, and got locked inside. THAT made you NEVER want to come back,
which locked the door to getting out even harder.
Recognize the Chinese finger trap you are in.
You can get out of any trap.
The way IN is the way out.
Just turn around and WALK IN.
You will pop out.
It is a matter of willingness.
You are stuck forever where ever you are unwilling to have entered.
You don't have to be willing to STAY, but you have to be willing to have
ENTERED, even knowing all the while that you would be immediately
unwilling to stay.
But you CAN'T get stuck anywhere, unless you alter your view of
COMING IN.
Its when you regret having come in, claiming you didn't know how
bad it would be, promising NEVER to do THAT again, that the fly trap
glue starts to set in.
You see it's denial of total responsibility.
You KNEW, and you CHOSE, and you MADE IT exactly as it was.
Immediately after you denied it all IN ORDER TO STAY.
From ADORE,
J.O.Y means Jokes On You.
Self confidence is confiding to yourself that you did this thing to
yourself.
The world is a dream and it is also a game of Pong.
Conscious pictures can not affect conscious pictures. Only SOURCE
can affect color form or conscious pictures.
THE ABILITY OF CAUSE IS TO CAUSE EFFECTS, NOT TO CAUSE OTHER CAUSE!
But cause can cause *ILLUSIONS* of other cause.
SOURCE through WILL is cause. Source assigns cause to virtual
sources, bouncers and transmitters. But only when the Will asks it to.
That's YOU, Bozo.
From ADORE,
"You are a Sourcer.
Sourcers like to cast sourcery, usually on Apprehentices.
Apprehentices are apprehensive about apprehending sourcery.
Sourcers cast sourcery from source by casting Pride before
Magnificence.
SOURCE stands for Sovereign Omnilord of Unanimous Regency and
Caliber Excaliper.
Source gets into a regal fury if its names are spelled wrong.
The correct spellings are Source, Sourcery and Sourcer or
Sourcerer.
Pronounce them as you kind, if you leave out the U from the word
SOURCERER you will leave out the Unanimousness of his Regency.
Regency is universal acceptance by others out side of one's own
normal operating jurisdictions by virtue of needed, wanted and
acknowledged superior operating know how.
Caliber is WORTH, via Harmonies and Kindship, Intelligence and
Sensitivity, and Star Captain Ability and Operating Know How.
Calipers measure caliber. The caliper of the caliber of souls, is
the questions they have asked and the answers they have rejected.
Excaliber means without worth.
Excaliper means without measure. Worth beyond measure.
Excalibur is the two edged sword of Excaliber and Excaliper.
Of worthlessness and worth beyond measure.
Of omni no class and omni out class.
They who can handle the spectrum, live.
A Wizard is anyone who is a wiz with the sword.
The sword is stuck in the star rock of your mind by your own
present time operational wizardry.
A King is anyone who can free and wield Excalibur for themselves
and for others.
King Arthur was able to pull the sword of Excalibur from the rock
because he was willing to put it back in again so that other's might
try.
The others would not have been so willing, so they couldn't pull it
out at all.
The way in, is the way out."
Well, I TOLD you this was fantasy.
So getting back to reality here...
Thus when any conscious picture 'bounces' off another conscious
picture it is because SOURCE is directing both to behave that way and
not because of any 'cause' inherently existing in the conscious pictures
that bounced off of each other.
The same thing goes for the sun or a light bulb. They are ASSIGNED
sources. They glow and are visible for the exact same reason that the
walls glow and are visible. Conscious pictures are SELF LUMINOUS. The
sun does not light the walls in your dreams, and neither does it light
the walls in your present 'waking' state (snore!)
In fact at the next level of consciousness up, it is quite apparent
that the sun does not light anything, as everything glows with its own
light. Its called 'self-luminous consciousness'. People try to get
there with drugs. They usually end up in jail.
The reason that conscious pictures of balls bounce off of other
conscious pictures of walls is because of the third party. However that
third party is NOT an external universe of matter, energy, space and
time as most dreamers think. Rather it is an internal Source that
connects us all. The soul is a portal through which Source projects
from inside us, AT OUR COMMAND, to the apparent outside, an outside of
color form and conscious pictures, which in the last analysis is a
hologram.
Life is a holodeck.
The proof that the world is a dream comes from re-operation of the
moment you decided to forget it was a dream.
You don't have to BELIEVE anything to make this work. Just feel
around for the effort that you would have had to exert to forget that
the world was a dream IF IT WERE a dream, and you will eventually find
it. At which moment you will also remember why you wanted to forget it
in the first place.
Who you gonna call?
Homer
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
Copyright (C) 1990 Homer Wilson Smith
'The outrageousness of the mechanics of learning is matched only by
the outrageousness of what we have learned.'
From ADORE, A Divine Operating Religion of Excellence.
The world consists of CAUSE and ASSIGNED CAUSE.
CAUSE ASSIGNS CAUSE to things which otherwise are basically effect.
They are the effect of having been created by cause and they are the
effect of having had cause assigned to them by cause.
Assigned cause is not true cause, assigned cause is illusory cause,
objects that have been assigned cause interact with each other AS IF
they had true cause, but only true cause has true cause and that is the
cause that assigned the cause to the objects.
You are cause. Everything you are conscious of, the world of dream
objects around you perceived as colorforms in space and time in the
rendition zone of your consciousness, is an effect to which you have
assigned cause.
The purpose of assigning cause to an effect is to be the effect
yourself of something you have created. By assigning cause to something
other than yourself, you are in the same breath claiming to be an effect
of that same thing. You are saying it is cause, I am effect, it is
cause over me.
The catch is whether you are aware that you are assigning cause or
not.
More specifically whether you are aware that assigning cause to
something is CAUSE of that thing having cause over you.
A being in good shape and in a high enough state is aware that he
is assigning cause and ASSIGNS CAUSE to his ASSIGNING CAUSE as the
reason that other things have cause.
As a being comes down tone and CHOOSES to lose awareness that he is
assigning cause, he continues to assign cause but no longer considers
that his assigning cause is CAUSE of other things having cause. Instead
he considers that other things just exist and always had cause in the
first place and his act of assigning cause is more an act of LEARNING or
AGREEING that they have cause, than an act of CAUSATION that they have
cause.
He assigns it cause because it BIT him. He had no responsibility
for it you see?
Learning is an INFLOW. Assigning cause is an OUTFLOW. They are
dicoms to each other, dichotomies of comparable and opposite magnitude.
CREATION is an OUTFLOW and involves KNOWING first what you want to
exist and then making it so. This is outflow.
Actually if you are high enough, just knowing what you want is
ENOUGH to make it exist, and things are created in the mere conception
of them. God's don't 'plan' what to create by knowing first and
creating second. You know it, you got it, that's operating sovereignty
at its best.
This is the operation of a Creator. You KNOW something and THEN it
exists.
LEARNING is an INFLOW and involves having something exist first,
but not knowing anything about it, and then LOOKING at it to LEARN what
you want to KNOW about it. This is inflow.
This is the operation of a Creature. Things exist first, then you
LEARN about them because they impinge on you. First it exists, and THEN
you KNOW about it.
When a person has come down to the bottom of the barrel where he
thinks he did not exist before a certain time, and that the entire
universe conspired in a coincidence of space, time, form and event to
create him, then he becomes devoted to LEARNING about the universe and
in the same breath declares he is the EFFECT of everything.
At the same time he ceases to create anything new to know.
He becomes the total effect of the universe at large claiming that
he has no idea what's out there but that he must find out.
Creators create ANSWERS first, and QUESTIONS second through fair
chosen NOT KNOWING of what they just created. This causes a game.
Creatures create QUESTIONS first and ANSWERS second through
LEARNING by LOOKING.
The purpose of being a Creator is to become a Creature.
Creators become Creatures at will, through masking created answers
with created questions.
The purpose of being a Creature is to unmask answers by asking
questions. This is GAME.
Creatures can re-become Creators at will. The way to become the
Creator is to BE the Creator becoming the Creature. The way IN is the
way OUT. The PURPOSE of BEING a Creator is to BECOME a Creature.
The way out of any mess is to reoperate MAKING the mess, which
consists mainly of creating things to know, pretending that you did not
create them and do not know about them and proceeding to devote your
self to LEARNING about them after they have been created. Especially
trying to learn who or what created them.
Yes others can make things in your dream, but only if you make it
so that they can, and in any case you can always make what they made and
duplicate it out of existence as your own. But that's a fast way to get
rid of others out of your dream which may no be desirable.
This is the way to create any dream and therefore is also the way
out of any dream.
If you create any dream once, it persists. If you create the same
dream twice it vanishes. Write once, it's there. Write again, it's
gone.
The answer to the mystery of life is that the QUESTIONS were
CREATED AFTER ANSWERS. The NOT KNOW happened AFTER the KNOW. Before
the KNOW was the big snooze.
Don't be dismayed if you cant figure it all out in a day.
It took you a few hundred trillion years and Lord knows how many
universes you have come down through, to get into the tightly wound up
mess you are in now.
MESS means Magnificent Examples of Shames and Shambles.
Remember there is ALWAYS BEAUTY to it.
However you should be able to re-ravel (sic) your way out of it in
one lifetime.
Unless you spend too much time in Church or the Army.
There are three kinds of assigned cause.
Sources, bouncers, and transmitters.
The sun is a source, the moon is a bouncer, and the space and time
between them is a transmitter.
The sun is an assigned cause of 'light' or photons. Just as
photons do not light your dreams at night, neither do they light the
waking dream you call reality.
Yes the world is a dream, and photons are virtual only.
However once you say that photons exist, they exist virtually,
which means they as good as exist in terms of being able to make them do
things, measure them with other dream instruments, and have them light
walls and things for you to see.
The dream instrument can always measure (sense) the dream, but
dream instruments can never measure the dreamer. The dream instrument
can never measure anything except what the dreamer claims it can. Thus
the dream instrument can measure other dream phenomenon in accordance
with the dreamer's wishes and rules of operation laid out for the dream.
Walls which reflect photons are bouncers. WHY does the wall
reflect the photon? BECAUSE the wall is CAUSE over the photon. If the
wall were a dream however, that would be an assigned cause, because
walls in dreams don't bounce photons in dreams, even though the light on
the bed side table is on in the dream and the walls are lit.
In a dream, you can turn the light off and the walls stay lit.
You can do this in the waking state too if you dare.
Being able to see in the dark is an OT ability.
If you assume as the meatballs do that the wall is actual, you USE
the fact of the real wall's causation over the photon to find out about
the wall, to determine that the wall is there in the first place. If
the wall exercised no CAUSE over anything you would never be able to
know anything about it.
This is called LEARNING BY BEING AN EFFECT.
This means learning about something by being the effect of it's
cause. The wall CAUSES the photon to change course, the photon CAUSES
your retina to change state, which CAUSES you to see a conscious picture
of the wall.
The wall is cause, you are effect. If the wall were not cause,
then you would never be the effect of it and you would never know it was
there.
In a dream, all this is rigged up to behave the same way,
so that you can think you are awake while still dreaming. But the
true cause in the dream is a third party virtualizing the causation
between ball and wall to make it convincing.
PONG
Take the game of pong.
This is the earliest video game and consisted of a black and white
TV screen lying horizontal with two roller balls for two players. On
the screen were displayed two white light paddles and a white light
bouncing ball.
The ball was made to move back and forth across the screen from
player to player like a game of ping pong and the light paddles were
controlled by the roller balls in the hand of each player.
If you got the paddle in front of the ball coming your way the ball
would 'bounce' off the paddle at the correct angle and head back over to
your opponent. You lost a point by missing the ball and letting it
cross your goal line.
So the obvious question arises, 'WHY DOES THE BALL BOUNCE OFF THE
PADDLE?'
Is there anything different about this and bouncing a real ball off
a real wall?
For people who believe that the external universe exists, the
answer is clearly yes. The difference lies in the presence of true
CAUSE.
A real ball bounces off a real wall because both the ball and the
wall have real CAUSE over each other, which causes them to interact in
such a way to cause a bounce. No conscious unit need be involved in
this for it to take place.
In the pong game, however, the light ball bounces off the light
paddle because a THIRD PARTY, namely the computer which is projecting
both, is keeping track of the virtual positions of both and when they
come to a place where they are supposed to bounce, the computer
arbitrarily causes them to do so. It could have just as easily caused
the light ball to go through the light paddle.
In both cases there is CAUSE. There always has to be CAUSE. But
in the real world case, the cause lies in the two objects in question
ONLY. There are two objects, the wall and the ball, and the cause they
own between them is sufficient to explain the interaction.
In the pong game case, however, the light ball is a real object,
and the light paddle is a real object, namely real photons on a real TV
screen, but they do not have sufficient cause between them to cause an
interaction to take place (namely a bounce). Instead one must look for
the THIRD PARTY that also has cause over the light ball and the light
paddle and which can cause them to change course in such a way that it
SEEMS that the ball and paddle have a direct causal relationship to each
other.
THE PURPOSE OF THE THIRD PARTY CAUSE IS TO CREATE THE ILLUSION THAT
THERE IS NO THIRD PARTY CAUSE AND THAT THE TWO OTHER PARTIES HAVE
SUFFICIENT CAUSE BETWEEN THEM ALONE TO CAUSE THE BOUNCE.
One can diagram the causal lines in each case. In the case of a
real ball bouncing off a real wall, the causal line is a single straight
line connecting the ball and wall.
In the pong game case there are two causal lines, one from the
central computer to the light ball, and the other from the central
computer to the light paddle. There is also a third causal line within
the central computer keeping track of and comparing the relative
positions of the two other causal lines it is projecting onto the
screen.
THE PURPOSE OF THE CENTRAL COMPUTER AND ITS 3 CAUSAL LINES IS TO
PROJECT THE ILLUSION OF NO CENTRAL COMPUTER AND ONE CAUSAL LINE BETWEEN
THE BALL AND THE WALL.
The purpose of the illusion is so that something, YOU, which is
inherently total cause, can be an effect and have a game.
Games consists of freedoms, barriers and purposes.
If there were no barriers, if you could have whatever you wanted
just by thinking about it (you can, how do you think you created this
place?), there would be no game.
If you had no purposes, if you wanted nothing (you can do that
too), there would also be no game.
If you had no freedoms, if all there were, were wall to wall
barriers (yep, you can do that too) you would also have no game.
So a game consists of something you want to accomplish, a state of
the universe that does not exist now, but which can exist in the future,
a measured amount of ability to accomplish that end, and a measured
amount of barriers and challenges to those abilities to give you the
GAME.
You don't want too much ability or you will lose the game by
winning it too easy, and you don't want too little ability or you will
lose the game by getting slaughtered repeatedly. The essence of a game
is NOT KNOWING if you are going to win or lose, and extending the play
as long as possible.
Thus beings adjust their abilities to give themselves an optimum
game condition. This is called tuning your power levels.
This includes the possibility of LOSS.
Not loss FOREVER however, although one neat game seems to involve
believing it IS forever even though it isn't. Can't imagine why anyone
would want to play that game. I hear its highly populated though.
One problem that beings have in assigning cause is forgetting that
they assigned cause. Sometimes they want the game to be REAL. And
sometimes they fall in love with the game so badly that just when it is
about to end because they have figured it all out, they decide to trash
themselves into an even deeper level of ignorance just to keep the SAME
game around for longer.
The guy is about to checkmate the other King, and he sacrifices his
queen instead.
Thus you will find that most of you have a number of times gotten
it all figured out in past lives, but rather than choose to leave the
game and all your friends and pet machines behind ("What? No unix in
heaven!?") you took another rocket powered dive into the abyss
pretending like you had never come close to knowing anything.
Unfortunately this tends to produce a rather messy game, because
you are in multiple levels of pretending you don't know anything even
after the fact of figuring it all out. When you begin to recover in
this lifetime you get the haunting feeling that you once 'had it all'.
You did, even after the Fall.
Also these second, third and fourth dives into ignorance are a
substitute, they are an effort to keep the ORIGINAL game going longer.
But that game ended the day you figured it all out, so you are still
trying to play a game that is gone by pretending that the game is not
gone yet. This screw up in the rules leads to a life full of losses,
more losses than usual, so many losses in fact that you may find
yourself cursing this game from head to toe and swearing off ever
entering another game again.
AN OPTIMAL GAME REMAINS FUN NO MATTER HOW MANY LOSSES (OR WINS!)
YOU SUFFER.
GAMES CAN ONLY GET BAD IF YOU HAVE ALREADY WON OR LOST THEM BUT
KEPT PLAYING THEM ANYHOW.
(This is not bottom of the barrel. Bottom of the barrel is the
GAME OF GAMES. That's where if you lose the present game, you lose the
ability and right to ever play any other game ever again.)
Above the game of games is having won or lost a game, but
continued it anyhow. Everything is down hill from there.)
This leads to sourness about being in the present game or entering
another game.
However, once you become sour on the prospect of entering a game
you lose your facility in the matter of coming into and out of games.
This of course keeps you firmly glued to the game you are in
because the way in is the way out, and if you aren't willing to
reoperate coming in, you can't get out.
But that is what you WANTED, to have this game continue forever.
The possibly unintended irony is that now you have what you wanted
because you can't stand it.
It is sort of a love/hate affair.
The house that is easiest to leave is the one you are most willing
to visit.
You fell out of love with this house because you hid the above fact
from yourself, and you tried to leave incorrectly, quite violently at
times, and got locked inside. THAT made you NEVER want to come back,
which locked the door to getting out even harder.
Recognize the Chinese finger trap you are in.
You can get out of any trap.
The way IN is the way out.
Just turn around and WALK IN.
You will pop out.
It is a matter of willingness.
You are stuck forever where ever you are unwilling to have entered.
You don't have to be willing to STAY, but you have to be willing to have
ENTERED, even knowing all the while that you would be immediately
unwilling to stay.
But you CAN'T get stuck anywhere, unless you alter your view of
COMING IN.
Its when you regret having come in, claiming you didn't know how
bad it would be, promising NEVER to do THAT again, that the fly trap
glue starts to set in.
You see it's denial of total responsibility.
You KNEW, and you CHOSE, and you MADE IT exactly as it was.
Immediately after you denied it all IN ORDER TO STAY.
From ADORE,
J.O.Y means Jokes On You.
Self confidence is confiding to yourself that you did this thing to
yourself.
The world is a dream and it is also a game of Pong.
Conscious pictures can not affect conscious pictures. Only SOURCE
can affect color form or conscious pictures.
THE ABILITY OF CAUSE IS TO CAUSE EFFECTS, NOT TO CAUSE OTHER CAUSE!
But cause can cause *ILLUSIONS* of other cause.
SOURCE through WILL is cause. Source assigns cause to virtual
sources, bouncers and transmitters. But only when the Will asks it to.
That's YOU, Bozo.
From ADORE,
"You are a Sourcer.
Sourcers like to cast sourcery, usually on Apprehentices.
Apprehentices are apprehensive about apprehending sourcery.
Sourcers cast sourcery from source by casting Pride before
Magnificence.
SOURCE stands for Sovereign Omnilord of Unanimous Regency and
Caliber Excaliper.
Source gets into a regal fury if its names are spelled wrong.
The correct spellings are Source, Sourcery and Sourcer or
Sourcerer.
Pronounce them as you kind, if you leave out the U from the word
SOURCERER you will leave out the Unanimousness of his Regency.
Regency is universal acceptance by others out side of one's own
normal operating jurisdictions by virtue of needed, wanted and
acknowledged superior operating know how.
Caliber is WORTH, via Harmonies and Kindship, Intelligence and
Sensitivity, and Star Captain Ability and Operating Know How.
Calipers measure caliber. The caliper of the caliber of souls, is
the questions they have asked and the answers they have rejected.
Excaliber means without worth.
Excaliper means without measure. Worth beyond measure.
Excalibur is the two edged sword of Excaliber and Excaliper.
Of worthlessness and worth beyond measure.
Of omni no class and omni out class.
They who can handle the spectrum, live.
A Wizard is anyone who is a wiz with the sword.
The sword is stuck in the star rock of your mind by your own
present time operational wizardry.
A King is anyone who can free and wield Excalibur for themselves
and for others.
King Arthur was able to pull the sword of Excalibur from the rock
because he was willing to put it back in again so that other's might
try.
The others would not have been so willing, so they couldn't pull it
out at all.
The way in, is the way out."
Well, I TOLD you this was fantasy.
So getting back to reality here...
Thus when any conscious picture 'bounces' off another conscious
picture it is because SOURCE is directing both to behave that way and
not because of any 'cause' inherently existing in the conscious pictures
that bounced off of each other.
The same thing goes for the sun or a light bulb. They are ASSIGNED
sources. They glow and are visible for the exact same reason that the
walls glow and are visible. Conscious pictures are SELF LUMINOUS. The
sun does not light the walls in your dreams, and neither does it light
the walls in your present 'waking' state (snore!)
In fact at the next level of consciousness up, it is quite apparent
that the sun does not light anything, as everything glows with its own
light. Its called 'self-luminous consciousness'. People try to get
there with drugs. They usually end up in jail.
The reason that conscious pictures of balls bounce off of other
conscious pictures of walls is because of the third party. However that
third party is NOT an external universe of matter, energy, space and
time as most dreamers think. Rather it is an internal Source that
connects us all. The soul is a portal through which Source projects
from inside us, AT OUR COMMAND, to the apparent outside, an outside of
color form and conscious pictures, which in the last analysis is a
hologram.
Life is a holodeck.
The proof that the world is a dream comes from re-operation of the
moment you decided to forget it was a dream.
You don't have to BELIEVE anything to make this work. Just feel
around for the effort that you would have had to exert to forget that
the world was a dream IF IT WERE a dream, and you will eventually find
it. At which moment you will also remember why you wanted to forget it
in the first place.
Who you gonna call?
Homer
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)