ADORE356 (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Kevin Brady (gomorrhan@hotmail.com) wrote:

>FreeSolo is just one technique, and it's entity handling. I wouldn't ever
>recommend handling anything that way, unless the person perceived an entity
>to handle.

I am sorry, you are quite right, still got the wrong
web page. I wanted the one on rising needle auditing.

Sigh...

No entities here.

Actually in looking over the page again, it seems to be to be
spot on, not sure one needs to do anything but audit entities, or
being entities etc.

Ron said, "Things persist to the degree they are not
granted life."

Engrams are just BT's in restim. I guess its just a matter of
reality.

Any consideration, AESP I come up with, I always check whose
it is.

Anyway I remember talking to freesolo about it, now there's a
lady. And perhaps I just extracted the rising needle tech from our
discussions.

I tend to audit beings exclusively, either me or others,
so I forgot that this page goes over the heads of most.

"You are a BT!"
"You are beautiful."
"Hey buddy, can you give me some help?"
"How many are you?"
"Who are you?"
"What are you?"
"When are you?"
"Where are you?"

Also run with '... am I?' on each of the above questions, when
auditing another BT.

I have known I am part of a cluster for a long time, and when I
am auditing 'me', I am really always auditing 'us.' Life gets very
dead for me when I don't acknowledge 'us'. It gets VERY alive when I
do.

Homer


- --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com

Fri Jul 28 00:35:47 EDT 2006

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Tue Jan 14 03:06:02 EST 2014
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore356.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning, but
not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFS1O/qURT1lqxE3HERAlOPAJ9HsuZwrQ93xvQ4fZDxyZuw0uL8FwCePjL4
DNdvs9IKUMtTl4PxSYBpsR4=
=+d/R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l