ADORE727 (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


SOMETHING AND NOTHING II

> Can you explain this to Scientologists?

Yes easily, if they are really scientologists and not just carrion
looking for a job.

There is as-isness, the moment of creation and vanishment. The
creation vanishes once the being takes his attention off the creation.

Anyone can do this with a mockup.

There is Alter-isness, which is the act of altering one's awareness
of the truth about the creation, which then causes it to persist because
one is no longer free to take one's attention off of it entirely.

For example the idea that one has a mockup that someone ELSE
created without permission is enough to morbidly fixate the attention of
the creator on his creation because now he thinks he didn't create it
and who the hell did!

It is a violation of sovereignty and puts the being on high alert,
and he doesn't WANT to get rid of the creation, because he is using it
as proof that his sovereignty was violated and something else very
dangerous is in the universe that can create things for him. Creates
monster feelings and vibrations.

That is one way to alter-is something into unwilling persistence.

There is Is-ness, which is the persisting apparencies of existence
composed of all the altered creations that have ever been made that have
not yet been re as-ised.

One re as-ises something by recovering the exact moment and place
the creation was first created and alter-ised, only this time one
forgoes the alter-is, at which point one can take one's attention off it
and it vanishes.

However most beings have forgotten how to re as-is things, or they
don't believe it is possible. Instead they try to not-is them, which
means throwing black mental mass and force at the creation to make it
appear to not be there.

Thus a not-isness is a pretended re as-isness.

The vanishment of uncreation is not the same as the apparent
vanishment of the NO and REFUSED.

Thus

"All case results from the effort to vanish creations via
not-isness rather than re as-isness."

It's technical, but any Scner who can't grok the terminology is not
a Scner but an imposter.

Homer

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Sat Feb 27 01:37:14 EST 2010

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Wed May 14 03:06:02 EDT 2014
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore727.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning, but
not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFTcxXbURT1lqxE3HERAq+7AKCDTmv+8egGsJ+mtlDJkUuM1a3+fQCeMBTI
K9jR02rIB1s3lDIdgf/nNEw=
=F7ul
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l