Monday, October 19, 2015

ADORE879 (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


THE STRUCTURE OF CASE III

We describe the true nothing there at the top of the tone scale as
nothing there.

We describe the apparent 'nothing there' at the bottom of the tone
scale as 'nothing there'.

GOD IN CARNATION

A God can create himself as anything.

Your preclear longs for the days of walking in limitless undying
love.

He can do that.

But if he is is going to love again as a God, he will have to learn
how to hate and regret again like a God too.

And, in the end how to feel nothing at all, as only a God can.

Either as ultimate truth, or as ultimate lie.

This is the emotional curve that takes a being from the beginning
of time at the top of the tone scale, to the end of time at the bottom,
and which echos itself over and over in every loss, both large and
small, in between.

The cycle of feeling starts at native state with nothing there.

It then enters ecstatic love at first isness.

It then falls down through hate and no sympathy at second isness,
to regret.

From there it sinks out of sight, finally and permanently to
'nothing there' again, total and utter not-isness, at the bottom of the
tone scale.

A God can and would do that to himself.

For a while :)

Nothing there is the birth place of the Gods at the top, and
'nothing there' is the dying place of the Gods at the bottom.

The final burial ground.

So if you are walking in 'nothing there,' tread softly, for how
many souls are there, beneath your feet?

The only difference between the top and the bottom, is at the top
the God is free to put something there, and at the bottom he isn't.

The bottom is ENFORCED top.

The whole thing is held together by beauty, admiration and humor.

The humor of ludicrous demise.

The humor is hidden in the brilliance, simplicity and intelligence
of the mechanism of descent.

The mechanism of descent is not seen on the way down, except by
others high enough to see it, but is seen on the way back up.

Thus salvation from nothing there or 'nothing there' is a matter of
understandings.

Understandings about nothing there and something there.

In particular the way to get rid of bottom scale 'nothing there' is
NOT to try to put something there, but to put 'nothing there' some more.

That's because the 'nothing there' at the bottom is an apparency of
nothing there, it is in actuality a lot of something there in the form
of force, effort, mass, blackness, and invisibility, not to mention the
many something theres that it is trying to cover.

The way to vanish any something there is to put it there some more,
until it's true as-isness appears, then let go of it and make something
else.

Thus the way to get rid of the apparency of 'nothing there' at the
bottom is to put more 'nothing there.'

As you audit the 'nothing there' in this way, your preclear becomes
aware it is very much something there, mega tons worth of it, and
eventually, as the 'nothing there' vanishes, the something theres it was
designed to cover start to surface.

At which point the surfacing something theres are handled the same
way, put more of them there, let the significances drain off until a
pristine as-isness is clear, then let it go.

Your preclear has the top of the tone scale confused with the
bottom.

The top of the tone scale is truly nothing there.

The way to 'get rid' of native state nothing there, is to indeed
put something there (first isnesses).

But then your preclear has tried to get rid of those something
theres, first by putting more OTHER something theres (second isnesses),
then failing that, by putting 'nothing there' using bottom scale forms
of effort, force, mass, blackness and invisibility.

THEN, God forgive him, and Lord save him, he tries to get rid
of the bottom scale 'nothing theres' by putting something there.

But he can't, he has 50 percent of his beingness putting the
original top scale something theres, then he's got the remaining 50
percent of this beingness trying to cover them with bottom scale
'nothing theres.'

With what energy now will he resist the bottom scale 'nothing
theres' by putting more something theres?

The way out of a top scale heaven nothing there is to put something
there.

The way out of a bottom scale hell 'nothing there,' is to put MORE
nothing there.

You don't solve a Black V case by forcing him to peer into the
darkness to see what is there, or to put something ELSE there anyhow.

You find out what he can see, even vaguely then you make sure
he can't see even that.

You turn a Black V case into a Black Infinity case, and the he will
suddenly see how it works, and become an infinity case that can see
anything.

A being can lose utterly.

This is how he does it.

This is the mechanism.

You think spirits have it bad, it's the same for animals.

There is nothing sadder than seeing a starving animal trying to
eat.

He is using methods to handle top scale nothing theres, to solve
bottom scale 'nothing theres.'

That's it, that's all there is.

He is trying to put something there, instead of more 'nothing
there'.

If he can't CREATE what is killing him, he can't remove it and
become independent of it again.

One has to see it work both going down and going back up to
appreciate it.

High appreciation for ludicrous demise, powers the dance of
existence from top to bottom, via the dwindling spiral of creation,
survival and destruction at the bottom of the sea.

It can be turned around at any time.

It can and will be turned around for everyone at some point before
the end of the present while.

It shouldn't be turned around too early, people enjoy their games.

The mechanism of descent is the only mechanism there is, it is not
a mistake and, for a totally self responsible being, couldn't be any
other way.

But descent can get out of control as understandings wane and
darken, and no one is left to audit or be audited.

It can become impossible, through those lack of understandings, to
turn any of it around for anyone, until understandings arise again,
through prime postulates, in one or more beings who can help.

God help you if you are the only one during such a time of rebirth.

A prime postulate is a positive or negative postulate that is
issued by beings, independent of any thing going on before, in the
present or after.

Prime postulates therefore can help or harm equally well.

Prime postulates are like a major roll of the dice affecting how
the present turns into the future.

However that may be, the while WILL end one day, all significances
will vaporize into humor, all something theres will return to nothing
there at native state, and all will be free to create again.

Humor and peace are not a REWARD for those that make it go right or
are 'deserving', humor and peace are home to all.

The fewer that hang out worrying about the descending and what to
do about them, the easier it becomes for them to wake up from their
descent.

We all know instinctively how it works.

OUR EXISTENCE IN IGNORANCE IS NOT A MISTAKE.

Our artful dodge is well arted.

These understandings get covered not only by the being's own fair
chosen not-isness, but by the postulates of everyone else to the effect
that others will 'never make it out'.

No one can confront the damned, so everyone not-ises them too,
which makes it worse for them.

You can postulate for others too, so watch it, forevers kill.

Postulating or considering that someone else is or might be
unhelpable forever makes things worse for them.

Considering that someone is unhelpable makes YOU unhelpable.

You are your brother's keeper, and I don't care WHO it is, that
person is your brother.

You don't have to be the one that helps them, you just have to know
that one day they will be helped and will come to help others.

Understand?

That forever worry about others, keeps the worrier in and
descending too, because they can't confront leaving the damned behind
forever.

It is an untenable failure in self to be unable to help another, it
doesn't matter whether you love them or hate them.

A dog pc is someone who can't be helped.

A dog auditor is someone who can't help.

A dog auditor is someone who can't blow the not-isness off a case.
and who can't deal with the revealed second isnesses of hate,
no-sympathy and regret.

A dog auditor is someone who handles second isnesses with
not-isness, and then handles not-isness with third isnesses.

What's a third isness?

I haven't a clue, but it ain't going up.

There may be no such thing as a dog pc, but the dog house is filled
with dog auditors.

Mostly all barking at each other.

Help powered by love and good humor is worthwhile, but help powered
by drama is a death trap for both, helper and helpee.

Drama means seriousness, PERMANENCE, importance and pain.

So you do not want to wait around for the end of the while (time)
before you turn yourself and your friends around.

The days of love await your return *NOW*.

Homer

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Sun Oct 23 23:07:03 EDT 2011

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Wed Sep 23 12:06:01 EDT 2015
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore879.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFWAs3pURT1lqxE3HERAtKPAJ4/NYKXiY4t0990Y53yYhgsBpg3LQCfaoAv
3OEg91d8bpNjPLYD1WjMn4o=
=/NSU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l

No comments:

Post a Comment