adore561.memo (fwd)

HELL FOREVER

For someone to end up in hell forever because he was judged and
put there by another, is absurd.

For someone to end up in hell forever who doesn't want to end up in
hell forever, is absurd.

For someone to end up in hell forever because he couldn't help but end
up in hell forever through ignorance, impulse or flaw is absurd.

For someone to end up in hell forever because they WANT to end up in
hell forever is also absurd.

Therefore there is no hell forever except for those who want others to
go to hell forever, and even then they go to hell forever only for as long
as they continue to want it for others.

This is the basic theta trap, a kind of feed back loop that
saturates in the on state.

Someone does something bad to you, so you want them to
go to hell forever.

That put's YOU in hell forever as you are creating it for them but
they aren't accepting it so you got it and keep it alive undelivered.

You then blame them for you being in hell forever, which makes you
want them more to be in hell forever which puts you more in hell forever
yourself.

The more you blame another and thus want them to be in hell forever
because you conceive they put you in hell forever, the more you end up in
hell forever yourself.

How bad can it get?

Spiritual death, you basically torture yourself into unconsciousness
forever more.

What is the solution to it?

There has to be a solution to it, because 'forever more' means in
time, and all whiles are finite in length.

Homer


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com

Sun Dec 9 15:02:56 EST 2007

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Tue Feb 2 06:06:03 EST 2016
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore561.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning, but
not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
_______________________________________________
Clear-L mailing list
Clear-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/clear-l
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l