THE ANATOMY OF A SERVICE FAC

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


THE ANATOMY OF A SERVICE FAC

So how does confront increase affinity?

You know its like you can't audit a preclear over out ruds.

So you gotta F/N the session before it starts with ruds,
then you can restim the preclear in a controlled manner, send the
TA soaring then bring it back down to an F/N again.

But what of the preclear whose TA is 5.5 and stuck still,
and all the 2wc and ruds and check lists and other bull shit
doesn't touch it?

Confront, confront, confront....

Accept, Accept, Accept, you will be askimilated.

The issue is not confront, maybe holding your position in space, or
even a controlled non confront, that's a kind of confront too. Close your
eyes and don't look on purpose and be there.

But really the answer lies in knowing the structure of case and not
running garbage bullshit that might help the well behaved noodle become a
better behaved noodle.

What we are looking for are pinpoint precise moments when the
preclear's acceptance level for undelightful surprise was violated by an
severe life threatening unprediction, resulting in shock, timeless
incredibility, certainty something is true, certainty it is impossible,
loss of self confidence at prediction, not knowing one's context,
where/when one is and why, unsuccessful why finding for the failure to
predict, and a postulate that the only way to handle was to not handle and
be elsewhere physically, emotionally, mentally or spritually justified by
a computation or many.

Every key in has one or more of these pinpoint moments of violated
acceptance level of undelightful surprise, shock, why finding, failure,
loss of confidence followed by a 'safe solution' which later becomes a
major problem of its own.

Confronting usually addresses the later problem and its masses and
causes nothing but confronting the later problem.

Spoting the later problem AS A SOLUTION to the earlier surprise
may work if it takes one back to the actual surprise which then
will run out naturally.

That's why one never audits a preclear for long on what his problems
are, but directs their attention to what solutions they have had to that
problem, how they have tried 'to handle' it including by not handling it
and running away.

THAT audits the original problem because the solutions bring him
back to the true exact WHAT.

LIFE IS FULL OF SURPRISES, delightful and undelightful.

Every being has a fair chosen tolerance for unprediction, but being a
total knowingness too much unprediction results in worry and doubt about
self which spirals out of control very quickly.

He starts to go down tone so fast he can only stop the decline by
slamming on the brakes via a computation.

Scientology is very confused on their wrong and useless definition of
confusion, a jumble of particles, and missses completely on the moment of
UNEXPECTED UNDELIGHTFUL SURPRISE and lack of prediction and loss of
confidence and the CHOICE to handle shock by seeking sympathy, withdrawing
with hope of counter-coaxing, or going into oblivion, rather than running
it out back up to disaster, ruin, and eventually putting it there and then
letting it go.

This may be the WHY that scientology failed, a confusion on the
anatomy of the bank, which is not a held back confusion but a held back
UNEXPECTED SURPISE and sense of eternal violation of acceptance level for
surprise born of self casting doubt ("Whoa this is bad, I wonder how bad
it can get?!") and the apparency that one did not, could not, would not,
should not, had better not 'put it there'.

This happens on good surprises too. It might not seem that way but
unexpected heavens are just as bad as unexpected hells. So you have to
audit unexpected losses and gains.

Once a being goes into 'can not predict' he can't get back his
confidence and equanimity born of a strong acceptance level, and down the
tubies he goes, self determined life changes and all.

I have been soloing this sequence without a meter, its quite
startling, present time starts to go critical mass on the various
components of the event, and one can't stop it from reviving, all of them,
all at once.

Hell that's better than 40 years of chronic no case gain. :)

Homer

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com

======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Tue Aug 9 03:13:23 EDT 2016
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/ador1022.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFXqYKTURT1lqxE3HERAitYAJ0RBOGn9reVNyog0zOvOFvMD7L55gCeKii/
9gI8J6VojiOVWmVIba1r1R4=
=RdEE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l