LOGIC22 (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


LOGIC IS KING, THE BASIS OF LOGIC

The basis of logic is

IS means IS.
IS does not mean IS NOT.
Always IS or IS NOT.
Never IS and IS NOT.

An IS statement is any statement that uses the word IS, IS NOT,
or their English variants.

IS statements assign qualities to objects, objects to classes,
and classes to other classes.

Joey IS black.
Joey IS a dog.
All dogs ARE animals.

The basis of logic is not an arbitrary set of rules about IS, but
is a description of *SELF EVIDENT AND OBSERVABLE QUALITIES* of IS and
IS NOT.

"Logic IS King" means that any IS statement or group of IS
statements must be consistent with the basis of logic and the observed
nature of IS and IS NOT if they are to be considered meaningful
descriptions of actuality.

To say that "Logic IS NOT King" is to USE the basis of logic to
assert that Logic IS NOT King, thus "Logic IS NOT King" is self
denying and therefore without meaning or merit.

A self denying statement is a statement that denies its own
truth.

"All generalizations are false." (This is a generalization).

"All truth is relative." (Stated as an absolute truth).

"IS is the same as IS NOT." (Thus IS is not the same as IS NOT.)

Self denying statements are for broken minds, do not build a
philosophy around them.

People who speak in illogical IS statements are more interested in
the poetry of the sounds than the meaning of the words.

Homer

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth and Peace. Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Wed Jun 6 12:00:01 EDT 2018
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/logic22.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFbGAUCURT1lqxE3HERAgMCAKCa3zAA/mJXAp1OMnTS8vaxB/UqQwCeN3OY
pmhGIiaesPpQB0zhodWgU3w=
=zDPh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l