prime (fwd)

Homer wrote: 8-12-2008

> THE REASON FOR THE PRIME DIRECTIVE.
>
> "Prime directive: Do not demonstrate super normal powers to those
>who don't have them unless necessary for the greater good.
>
> Mere demonstration as evidence that such things exist to a
>incredulous crowd will NOT result in the greater good dreamed of.
>

This only hints at the real reason.

We are here as human beings to play a game. The game contains within it
many levels of games within games. The greater good means to keep the
games going. Games have rules. The rules of the game called Planet
Earth are laid out in the playing field and in the mind. The playing
field is the specific time-space-energy-matter matrix being explored by
physicists, chemists, biologists etc. These rules are not meant to be
broken, just as you can't mark or hide cards in poker without
consequenses, like getting thrown out of the game, or as in many
Westerns, shot dead. The rules laid out in the mind are in the form of
agreements about being in the game and about playing by the rules, among
others. These agreements are unconscious and unknown, and this
condition of not knowing the greater reality that is operating here is
also one of the agreements and preconditions which allows participation
in this shared reality. But in very complex games there can be many
loopholes and special rules covering special situations. Ultimately we
are creating the whole show and have confined our "game playing"
viewpoint to identifying as humans and other life forms during this eons
long multi-lifetime extravaganza. One of the games we can play within
this game is to wake up from this self imposed dream and escape the
game. Maybe we do this late in the game, who knows. Escaping the game
is fine as it does not disrupt the game. You can even help others
escape the game once you get free yourself. Since this has been going
on for millennia and in the open, it is not against the rules.

When something that IS against the rules occurs, it is like a fire that
has to be extinguished quickly. Who does this? We do; that is, we have
overseers who, by our agreement, enforce the rules. Basically we are
programmed to be unaware of our innate supreme ability to do ANYTHING,
and unable to utilize this ability even if we suspect we are more than a
fragile body-mind-organism. While waking up to freedom is OK, waking up
to power over the game and using it is generally NOT. Just as in the
Matrix movies, everyone in this game is a potential agent of the
enforcers. When you have billions of gods and goddesses galavanting in
a huge chaotic costume party things don't always go smoothly. Tables
get tipped over, fights break out, and various shenanigans and nefarious
or virtuous conspiracies can temporarily escape the all-seeing eye of
Big Brother. The rules do get broken - the sick get miraculously
healed, the dead rise, angels lend a hand, objects materialize,
levitate, disappear, cars about to crash go right through each other
like ghosts, and the absolutely impossible happens every single day!
Why don't we hear about it? We often do - we may even see it with our
own eyes BUT we don't allow ourselves to believe it, we filter what we
experience so what we see fits the rules. We use the very same
miraculous power to prevent our own game from breaking down. And when
we CAN'T or DON'T hide the miraculous from ourselves, we join the fringe
group of heretics (lunatics, weirdos, nut cases etc). And I haven't
even gotten started on the world-wide anti-spiritual propaganda
conspiracy! We aren't supposed to know.

Now the rules seem to have some leeway - if you get up to speed where
you can move a penny with pure intent, have at it - but don't show
anyone else! People tend to freak out with such demonstrations, which
could actually be dangerous for them or you! Remember everyone is a
potential enforcement agent. And if you do demonstrate to others, the
disturbance must be contained - it will not be allowed to spread to
where it could get out of hand. People who wake up (the Enlightened,
truly One with God people) often have miracles occurring around them in
some quantity and apparently this is allowed to some extent too. I
don't know exactly what the rules are, but I do have direct experience
with both the consequences of breaking them and the effects on
witnesses of such paranormal events (including telepathy, precognition,
psychokenesis, and anything the 'specials' did on the series Heroes).

Think about it - if you believe we are powerful spiritual beings then
what is going on and why? Are we just degraded beings trying to
recover our sovereignty in some 'expansion/contraction of the theta
universe' scenario or is this all by our own design being created from a
place of absolute and eternal sovereignty?

Between the ages of ten and fourteen I had many interesting abilities
manifest. They were just things I discovered I could do but I didn't
consider them mine so much as ... well it was like being given a magic
lamp where the power comes from somewhere else and I just rub the lamp
and asked for something. I woke up one night and I could feel this
energy all around that connected everything. I could manipulate it by
moving my hands like you would do if you were at the bottom of a
swimming pool and trying to raise a sunken ball without touching it.
So suddenly there was the ability to levitate objects a few feet off the
ground. I showed 2 adults separately and their reactions were to flee
the scene and to fall down and go into convulsions respectively. I
showed two little kids and they had little reaction. I stopped doing it
for awhile. One day I decided that I would join a circus and do this
trick to make some money to help my parents so we did't lose our house.
To see if I could still do it I made a pie rise off the kitchen
counter. No one else was present. The pie went up about a foot and I
held it there with intention but then it shot up to the ceiling and
disappeared and a voice said very firmly NO! I got the whole meaning
which was "you know this is against the rules and you are forbidden to
do this in public". The pie wasn't missed so much as my mom's best pie
pan,which we never found. I lost my abilities soon after that.

I have experienced several other similar interventions by the "powers
that be" which makes it clear to me that the Prime Directive, or the
enforcement of the rules of this game, is quite real. I don't
understand it anymore than that and my speculations above. So we can
probably rise to whatever level of clarity and power we want and still
be in the game, but discretion is required. But few people are on a
real and workable path to either, so for most this caution will be a
moot point.

What I pasted below is also relevant:

Pip

PS: pardon my com lag

>
> THE PRIME DIRECTIVE RUNDOWN
>
> The term prime directive is taken from the Star Trek series where
> the federation had a rule to not interfere in the evolution of evolving
> planets no matter what. When they did, all sorts of bad things
> happened, and weird solutions were put in place to fix it, often worse
> than if they had left things alone.
>
> Electra started this stuff on the Prime Directive by saying
> essentially, do not demonstrate OT powers to those who do not have them,
> especially only to prove to others that they exist or that you have
> them. The consequences she warned were dire. It seemed to bring the
> jackals out in force. Contempt and ridicule are their cat call.
>
> The basic theory is that OT power is used to limit OT power, so of
> course if we are OT's we are using OT power in present time to not be
> OT's, the magic of no magic.
>
> One imagines that abuse of OT power could lead to limitation of OT
> power, and thus one wants to find those moments of abuse, what 'prime
> directive' was disobeyed, or even blindly followed, what prime
> directive's produced insufferable conflicts, and at what point did one
> give up on having a prime directive other than to have no prime
> directive or to eventually create the prime directive to have no power
> at all!
>
> Every change in power status, indicates a change in prime
> directive.
>
> Thus auditing what one would do if one had powers of various kinds,
> is very constructive. One eventually comes to certainty of power even
> if one still can't quite exercise any of it. At least one chills out
> about being in jail. Then one has the equanimity to look and see and
> possibly clean up the mess of power in its own good time.
>
> Because it deals with power, the prime directive rundown is a
> powerful rundown, not to be cast as pearls before swine.
>
> Know them by their cat calls of contempt and ridicule.
>
> Homer
Thu Aug 5 19:45:56 EDT 2010

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Thu Oct 25 18:06:02 EDT 2018
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/pip/prime
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning, but
not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

_______________________________________________
Clear-L mailing list
Clear-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/clear-l
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l