CHRISTIAN-INANITY

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

CHRISTIAN-INANITY

Christian-inanity is only successful with those seeking eternal
damnation for others, or absolution of full responsibility for their
'sins.'

Prayer does in fact not work, as it prepostulates an other
determinism that will accomplish things for you, but only if you are
good and pray hard enough, i.e. propitiation.

As each being IS the multi I-Am God in carnation, praying to
another, counter postulates one's own ability to pull things off
directly. Doing this long enough results in having no ability of your
own.

When the prayer to another is fullfilled, we say 'Thank you God!',
and when it isn't we wonder about ourselves.

Sicker does not sicker come.

Nothing like depending on yourself to create the willies.

"What, you are going to try to survive this disaster without asking
God for his blessing?"

Cases need to have the tendency to pray to another totally run out
of their case before their true OT abilities start to manifest
positively again.

Until then the basic operating postulate is to be a worthless
schmuck, which postulate seems to works just fine.

Homer

Richard Ford <doorman.ford@googlemail.com> wrote:
> CHRISTIANITY
>
> We often forget that Christianity is many thousands of times more
> successful than Scientology.
>
> We also forget that it makes many of the same promises. Immortality,
> miracles and so on.
>
> Many Christians believe that prayer works like a postulate- changing
> reality directly. This means that a Christian can achive full OT
> powers simply by getting on his knees and praying sincerely.
>
> WHY IS CHRISTIANITY BETTER THAN DIANETICS?
>
> 1. Christianity is a personal religion. Everyone has their own idea of
> God.
>
> 2. With Christianity you go OT on day one!

- --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Tue Jan 20 17:42:18 EST 2009

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sat Dec 1 03:06:02 EST 2012
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore633.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning, but
not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFQubpqURT1lqxE3HERAjRFAJ9OXxR/dTYt9LSGriVyggDvTUFDpgCgqaj1
YdRZR72vcWYOMv2mIHelz30=
=WNT7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l