QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

One of the worst things in Scientology is the inability or
unwillingness to run a question without insisting upon getting an
answer.

There may be answers, and maybe they are sometimes important to
find, but mostly what is messing the pc up is mis handled questions.

The answers are just not that important, except incorrect ones!

Thus it is the question that needs to be found, not the answer!

By refusing to run questions unless the pc gives answers, many
questions are not run flat AS QUESTIONS, and thus charge is missed and
bypassed, and the pc is given a loss because he said 'I don't know' to
the question.

For example auditor wants to run 'Who or what would oppose a
damnation manager?'

PC has no clue about answers, but is interested in the question
and the item involved.

So instead run "Get the idea of opposing a damnation manager."

You see, no need for an answer to a question.

Since dramatized question asking is at the root source of all
aberration, forcing a pc to ask and answer questions is a highly
dangerous undertaking unless it is done absolutely right.

Anyone claiming to be able to do this across the boards on any pc
is lying. My opinion.

What you want him to do is to knowingly ask the question he is
already asking unknowingly with every breath he takes. Once he spots
the question and the dramatization that goes with it, he can chill out
about it.

He is killing himself with the QUESTION! Not with not knowing
the answer.

He gets better by chilling out about the question, not by knowing
the answer!

Dramatization means bringing drama to, drama is importance,
seriousness, permanence (forever/never) and pain. This usually
manifests as real heavy effort down in the numb range of awareness.

He is killing himself slowly wanting to know so bad, but he no
longer knows exactly what it is he wants to know, and that he also
doesn't want to know it at the same time.

Thus he is bidirectional heavy effort dramatizing, for and
against, which forms a ridge which he then calls his face.

Worse his dramatization is on automatic, it is compulsive and
convulsive. Sort of like the dry heaves when it happens. There is no
stopping it, and there is no spotting it until after it happens.

As he first approaches it, its so fast and so hard it just knocks
him unconscious as he does it. That's why he never spots it and
wonders why he has a headache later.

Then once he is genned in on the thing, he will start spotting it
after it happens, and he says 'I saw that!' and he be's with it for a
while. He says "I created that!" even though he saw it only after it
happened, that's taking responsibility, but it works.

Then the next time it happens, he's right there as it happens,
and he says 'Uh Homer you think you could stop doing that quite so
hard pretty please (you asshole!), eh?'

Then he will be there before it happens and he can chill it out
during its convulsion, kind of do it slowly and intentionally, and
draw it out, but not with the total force or blind kamikazee
determination like he was originally doing it with.

Determination is dramatization and cements in failure, as it
prepostulates probable failure, and commits to that pre postulate with
heavy efforts.

Then he will be there before it happens, and it won't happen,
something else will happen instead, and he will be relieved of that
piece of nonsense forever.

If you ask questions inside your face, you become a face.

People's faces are generally as ugly as they feel about the
questions they are asking inside their face and don't know it.

Homer

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com

Sun Feb 4 02:07:04 EST 2007

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Wed Dec 12 03:06:03 EST 2012
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore428.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning, but
not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFQyDrrURT1lqxE3HERAjZkAKCqikgUHHMDijNDZt5JMKE3lh+X0QCgqwmH
c1K4wJiAw0gDcPDhLueVjdM=
=XLqV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l