THE FIVE POINTS OF CLEARING

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


THE FIVE POINTS OF CLEARING

Word Clear:

> Willingness
> Change
> Problem
> To serve
> Purpose
> To solve
> Help
> Creation
> Responsibility

The process:

1.) "Spot a condition."

2.) "Get the idea the condition might serve a purpose."

3.) "Get the idea YOU are trying to solve the condition."

NEVER EVER USE 'WHAT' questions on this process.

Don't even figure out what they might be.

On 1.)

You could use 'Tell me a condition', but some conditions
are ineffable, and some preclears hate talking.

The same goes for the other 2 commands.

On 2.)

It isn't necessary to FIND a purpose, but purposes should be
considered on all flows and all dynamics, both constructive and
destructive.

One must run the motivator side and the overt side, against
others and against self.

The motivator and overt must be run absolutely in balance, if you
do not run the motivator, you won't find the overt, and if you don't run
the overt, the motivator will never run out.

The motivator is as bad as the overt is as bad as the motivator
is bad as the overt.

Some conditions are incidental consequences and not directly
intended, but result from other things that are. Blocking out your
visual cortex will probably cause headaches :)

On 3.)

Lastly the preclear should consider not just what he IS doing to
solve the condition, but what he HAS tried to do and maybe WILL try to
do to solve the condition.

CAVEAT

Conditions are problems are conditions are problems.

Conditions/problems can be used to solve prior conditions/problems.

People consider having a serious condition/problem to be a serious
disability, thus they are using further disabilities to 'solve' earlier
disabilities.

They then make motions to solve the later disability, but the
later disability is a SOLUTION to an earlier disability, so their
efforts to get rid of the disability will be alloyed with efforts
to put it there because it is useful to them.

They have considered having an ability to be a disability because
the ability brought regret through 'unintended' ruin and disaster, thus
they have sought to use their ability to have disabilities to solve the
problem of having an ability they no longer want.

Once the preclear see this, the thing will to some extent start to
come apart on its own, because the preclear will no long be buying into
his own hype and hard sell on what a poor dear innocent victim he is.

This may come as quite a surprise to him because below oblivion he
has NO CLUE why he is suffering. It will however be a welcome surprise
as it opens the door to self reconciliation, pride, trust and confidence
in his own responsibility again.

But the preclear will still have the brakes on getting better
because the original condition/problem/disaster was OUTRAGEOUS and your
preclear has some qualms, dread and trepidation about rage.

> What does the clearing of those particular words have to do with the
> command, "Spot a condition", et al?

The basic 5 are the basic 5 points of clearing, they are:

Change, problems, help, responsibility and creation.

The preclear has to be willing to change, particularly in time, to
unstick himself from the safe solution on the track that he is using to
keep himself down and come to present time where clear OTness is natural.
The preclear has adorned himself with and is WEARTING his most detested
incident as his present time beinging, which includes forever self
torment.

The preclear has to admit to problems and consider they are
solvable.

The preclear has to understand help, in order to get any and give
any. Help isn't just saving someone from drowning, it is team action on
any dynamic to pull off a creation beyond one's own capability.

Responsibility for the condition, and thus being able and willing
to put it there, allows one to let go of it and unput it there, also to
appreciate the aesthetic and humor to the condition, which is WHY he he
put it there in the first place it in the first place.

"The way to survive is to be a little bit deader..." or some such
thing. I do not have my wording or terminals yet, its a GPM issue.

"The source of all suffering is artful dodge, but it is all well
arted." - Adore

Remember a being waking up from Unexistence as a Spirit wakes up
into infinite wall to wall Criminality, his own and others.

Word clear criminality as morally bankrupt, and monstrosity and
abomination.

If adoration is willingness to operation, then abomination is what?

Better to go back to sleep, you see? :)

Creation is the top of the ladder, which is what it is all about.

The other words, solve, serve, and purpose are merely words in the
process.

Each item has its opposite dicom.

Find them and note them down.

One is stuck in the hugeness of the bad side, because one is
failing to admit to the hugeness of the good side.

That's in part why one runs infinite evil by running infinite
decency etc. As long as the evil is bigger than the decency, the
preclear will dig graves for himself to avoid it all.

> Did you get your E/P (reviv)?

Hell no, not yet, this is going to be a long run for me, as I am a
dead thetan from way back. It is running the entire bridge from Source
to Unexistence, which includes the entire OT band of personal creation
and disaster.

I am getting lots and lots of nasty but little revivs in my dreams,
but the main blocked perception remains.

Most detested incident includes most detested terminals and
identities, the greatest regrets and collateral damage from overts, and
the most considerations about never *EVER* creating/destroying again.

Basic dicom on that is Danger/Safety.

At the top, Able = Safety and Unable = Danger.

Below Spirit of Play, this becomes reversed.

The computation is that Able = Danger and Unable = Safety.

After creating too many disasters, accidentally and intentionally,
he gets into rue and resenting his abilities, and so he seeks safety by
becoming less and less able, rather than MORE able, back towards native
state.

By NOT putting it there, namely the disasters that were
'unintentionally' created, he gets stuck with them, and thus seeks to
hide from them by going lower into hysteria, shock, catatonia oblivion
... -> Unexistence.

It is all a pretense for show, but the consequences are deadly
serious as intended.

We are still running it an hour a day 6 days a week, and the
results are there, compared to ALL the other auditing *I* ever got, but
I am a well trained preclear and auditor, and S. and I have a good
understanding of each other and high agreement as to where we want to go
with it.

E/P would be no more unwanted conditions, except wanted unwanted
conditions.

That good enough for a bridge?

Homer

======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Mon Jun 10 12:39:36 EDT 2013
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore944.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFRtgFIURT1lqxE3HERAg/iAKCpnlrc6Hde5hT+npuELV6qCxwNAgCfVFzE
1GLkNWVkkhG1hSWvxRSduG4=
=6lUM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l