ACT47 (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



((Editors Comments in double parentheses - Homer))

THE SINS OF THE CHILDREN

ACT - 47
21 February 1994

Copyright (C) 1994 Homer Wilson Smith
Redistribution rights granted for non commercial purposes.


The sins of children will read on the parents as a withhold.

The parents will not want others to know what their children did.

They won't want others to know that the child is their child.

They will be trying to withhold the child from doing it again.

And in the end they will be withholding having had that child, or
ever having more.

Thus asking the preclear if he is withholding the overts of any of
his children or grand children etc, in this or in past lives is a good
way to find the central computation on the 2nd dynamic case of life
begetting life.

If you knowingly and willingly create a Free Will, and you let it
loose on the world, with full awareness of the possible consequences,
well then you are fully responsible, accountable and culpable for all of
its actions and all of the consequences.

If God is the Father, then he is fully responsible, accountable,
and culpable for the sins of his children, regardless of any
considerations about Free Will.

Christians try to deny that God is responsible, accountable and
culpable for the sins of His children, because they wish to deny that
they are responsible, accountable and culpable for the sins of their own
children.

The Christians will tell you that sins of the father are visited on
the children for 4 generations.

The truth is that the sins of the children are visited upon the
father forever or until a true confession is gleaned.

The way to happiness is a true confession.

Homer

======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Mon Mar 30 18:42:50 EDT 2015
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/act47.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFVGdFqURT1lqxE3HERAi+rAJ9TgIWIvv0xBj9ESGoB0tgYZnL2YACgmDb6
twV1MXdXW8A9vzluYh6GG3c=
=G7RL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l