-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
NO AUDITING
NO Auditing is a technical term, it doesn't mean that no auditing is =
taking place. It means that the ACTIONS and apparencies of auditing are =
taking place, often lots of it, but no case gain is being made. It might =
as well be that NO AUDITING is being done.
The preclear has two time tracks, his primary time track which he is =
trying to audit out, and a second time track of the auditing done to =
erase the primary one.
When a preclear has had lots of NO AUDITING, the auditing
time track is empty, regardless of the hours spent in session which show =
up in the primary time track rather than the auditing time track.
So when he goes to finally audit out his auditing, a necessary step, =
there is nothing there to audit. You can't even repair the no auditing, =
or rehab it, because there was NO auditing to repair and no wins to =
rehab.
So if SOME auditing is taking place, regardless of the amount of repair =
and rehabs incurred, there will be latent wins and actual wins =
manifesting strongly along the way and at the end of the cramming, and =
the auditing time track will be full and robust and the preclear will be =
happy as if it had been a smooth ride the whole way.
So you can't waste auditing by getting auditing no matter how misguided, =
rough or overrun or bypassed. Once the rehab and repairs are done, the =
latent wins will come out as if the errors were never made.
THERE IS NOTHING LIKE A CORRRECT INDICATION TO RAISE THE DEAD.
So BAD auditing is not NO auditing, BAD auditing is great auditing once =
the rehab and repair is done.
The ONLY way you can waste auditing time, is to deliver NO AUDITING.
So the next time you run into a Class XII NO Auditor, spot the no =
auditing up front and go find a bum in the street to audit you.
The *RELIEF* will be miraculous.
Homer
- ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01D34D29.774ED7D0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dwindows-1252" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META name=3DGENERATOR content=3D"MSHTML 8.00.6001.23588">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>post homer imissmira adore</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>
<P=20
style=3D"WIDOWS: 1; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; BACKGROUND-COLOR: =
rgb(255,255,255); TEXT-INDENT: 0px; MARGIN: 0px 0px 6px; DISPLAY: block; =
FONT: 14px/19px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; WHITE-SPACE: normal; =
LETTER-SPACING: normal; COLOR: rgb(29,33,41); WORD-SPACING: 0px; =
- -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px">NO=20
AUDITING</P>
<P=20
style=3D"WIDOWS: 1; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; BACKGROUND-COLOR: =
rgb(255,255,255); TEXT-INDENT: 0px; MARGIN: 6px 0px; FONT: 14px/19px =
Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; WHITE-SPACE: normal; LETTER-SPACING: =
normal; COLOR: rgb(29,33,41); WORD-SPACING: 0px; =
- -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px">NO=20
Auditing is a technical term, it doesn't mean that no auditing is taking =
place.=20
It means that the ACTIONS and apparencies of auditing are taking place, =
often=20
lots of it, but no case gain is being made. It might as well be that NO =
AUDITING=20
is being done.</P>
<P=20
style=3D"WIDOWS: 1; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; BACKGROUND-COLOR: =
rgb(255,255,255); TEXT-INDENT: 0px; MARGIN: 6px 0px; DISPLAY: block; =
FONT: 14px/19px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; WHITE-SPACE: normal; =
LETTER-SPACING: normal; COLOR: rgb(29,33,41); WORD-SPACING: 0px; =
- -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px">The=20
preclear has two time tracks, his primary time track which he is trying =
to audit=20
out, and a second time track of the auditing done to erase the primary =
one.</P>
<DIV=20
style=3D"WIDOWS: 1; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; BACKGROUND-COLOR: =
rgb(255,255,255); TEXT-INDENT: 0px; DISPLAY: inline; FONT: 14px/19px =
Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; WHITE-SPACE: normal; LETTER-SPACING: =
normal; COLOR: rgb(29,33,41); WORD-SPACING: 0px; =
- -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px"=20
class=3Dtext_exposed_show>
<P style=3D"MARGIN: 0px 0px 6px; FONT-FAMILY: inherit">When a preclear =
has had=20
lots of NO AUDITING, the auditing<BR>time track is empty, regardless of =
the=20
hours spent in session which show up in the primary time track rather =
than the=20
auditing time track.</P>
<P style=3D"MARGIN: 6px 0px; FONT-FAMILY: inherit">So when he goes to =
finally=20
audit out his auditing, a necessary step, there is nothing there to =
audit. You=20
can't even repair the no auditing, or rehab it, because there was NO =
auditing to=20
repair and no wins to rehab.</P>
<P style=3D"MARGIN: 6px 0px; FONT-FAMILY: inherit">So if SOME auditing =
is taking=20
place, regardless of the amount of repair and rehabs incurred, there =
will be=20
latent wins and actual wins manifesting strongly along the way and at =
the end of=20
the cramming, and the auditing time track will be full and robust and =
the=20
preclear will be happy as if it had been a smooth ride the whole =
way.</P>
<P style=3D"MARGIN: 6px 0px; FONT-FAMILY: inherit">So you can't waste =
auditing by=20
getting auditing no matter how misguided, rough or overrun or bypassed. =
Once the=20
rehab and repairs are done, the latent wins will come out as if the =
errors were=20
never made.</P>
<P style=3D"MARGIN: 6px 0px; FONT-FAMILY: inherit">THERE IS NOTHING LIKE =
A=20
CORRRECT INDICATION TO RAISE THE DEAD.</P>
<P style=3D"MARGIN: 6px 0px; FONT-FAMILY: inherit">So BAD auditing is =
not NO=20
auditing, BAD auditing is great auditing once the rehab and repair is =
done.</P>
<P style=3D"MARGIN: 6px 0px; FONT-FAMILY: inherit">The ONLY way you can =
waste=20
auditing time, is to deliver NO AUDITING.</P>
<P style=3D"MARGIN: 6px 0px; FONT-FAMILY: inherit">So the next time you =
run into a=20
Class XII NO Auditor, spot the no auditing up front and go find a bum in =
the=20
street to audit you.</P>
<P style=3D"MARGIN: 6px 0px; FONT-FAMILY: inherit">The *RELIEF* will be=20
miraculous.</P>
<P=20
style=3D"MARGIN: 6px 0px; FONT-FAMILY: =
inherit">Homer</P></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>
- ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01D34D29.774ED7D0--
======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Wed Oct 25 00:37:42 EDT 2017
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/ador1039.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFZ8BUXURT1lqxE3HERAq9nAJ4vBwfouLyQieIKsLrCrr16DEiJmQCeKbRy
vCNBvmgzewTjjHcQqSqaBoY=
=ZOBr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
No comments:
Post a Comment