ADORE426 (fwd)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

CHEMISTRY AND CONSCIOUSNESS

Ralph Hilton (ralph@ralphhilton.org) wrote:
>If God made pigs and pigs make shit, can God be said to be a shit?

No.

Thus if God made chemistry and chemistry made consciousness, then
God can not be said to be conscious as God is not made of chemistry.

Thus if God made space and time, and thus has no space or time
himself, and consciousness is a spacetime gizmo (machine), then God can
not be said to be conscious, because consciousness is a mechanical
creation of God, and God is not mechanical.

It can be reasonably doubted that there are two kinds of
consciousness, mechanical consciousness arising from spacetime mechanics
and non mechanical consciousness existing outside of space and time.

Most meatballs think that consciousness is chemistry bubbling away
at 98.6.

On the other hand if consciousness is not made of chemistry, if
consciousness is in fact not made of space or time, then consciousness
comes from the same roots of dimensionlessness that God does, and thus
it is quite reasonable to postulate that maybe God is conscious.

In fact one can reasonably wonder if all conscious units are not
God in carnation, in dreamtime.

Which is the first thing ever said (not by me) that makes any
sense on the subject of the relation between God and Soul.

Creature IS creator in carnation.

Homer

>--
>Ralph Hilton
>http://www.ralphhilton.org
>C-Meter: http://www.cmeter.org
>FZAOINT http://www.fzaoint.net

- --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com

Tue Jan 30 00:59:06 EST 2007

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Mon Jun 22 12:00:04 EDT 2020
WEB: http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore426.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFe8NWEURT1lqxE3HERAiKiAJ9RsYwHBlZ2Yc3ktoOROwv9/jnF+gCfcRDO
wa0i/FQauYJcJQnbH+dipvg=
=i46G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l