Hash: SHA1
THE UNCERTAINTY OF CERTAINTY
It's a common assertion by people that all certainties are
untrustable.
Like the certainty that certainty is impossible, the certainty
that all certainties are untrustable is illogical.
The certainty that all certainties are untrustable iomplies this
certainty is untrustable.
This opens the door to the possibility that some certainties are
trustable.
This is in fact the truth.
It behooves the auditor to help the pc to a state where he knows
what certainties are trustable and which aren't. Otherwise there is
no personal integrity to be had.
If the pc can't know what he knows and not know what he doesn't
know, then what hope is there of him ever drawing a correct conclusion
about anything?
It is commonly accepted that being "certain" of various things is
dangerous, because these 'certainties' turn out to be wrong.
(This is true, meatballs claim certainty on all kinds of things
that are in fact unknowable.)
It is therefore considered 'best practice' to consider all
certainties untrustable.
This is called a safe solution.
There is nothing more dangerous in the universe than a safe
solution.
Particularly when the light of consciousness is living certainty
itself.
In fact every consciousness-of is a perfect certainty.
The perfect certainties of consciousness are perfect because they
are continuously reverifiable, and thus can not be wrong.
Does anything exist? Yes? Good. Now let's check it out again.
Does anything exist? Yes? Good. Now let's check it out again.
Does anything exist? Yes? Good. Now let's check it out again.
Do you see two different colors in present time? Yes? Are you
sure? Would you bet your eternity in hell on it? Easily? Good. Now
let's check it out again...
The fact that you see a car doesn't mean that there IS a car, you
may be hallucinating. But the fact that you see a car does mean that
you see a car. People have their symbols and referents confused.
The fact of the hallucination and the hallucinators are not
hallucinations.
The LOOKER, the LOOKED THROUGH and the LOOKED AT are not
hallucinations, they are actual.
The existence of implied referents is always uncertain, and
can not be othewise. The external world is a theory. Consciousness however
is not.
The conscious experience of a car is a symbol for the referent
which is the alleged actual car 'out there'.
A hallucination is a symbol without a referent. The symbol is
always perfectly certain as it is a conscious experience. The
referent is never certain, as the existence of a symbol does not prove
the existence of a referent. No one has ever seen an actual car they
have only ever seen their own personal conscious color form picture of
a car.
There is in fact no evidence at all that an actual car exists out
there. Most people simply can't conceive of the alternative, that
matter energy space and time are dreams in the light of an infinite
number of consciousnesses.
Its an emotional thing for them.
No one wants to be the fool on the hill, and besides they enjoy
the game of death.
Only an immortal could.
A conscious unit, which thinks that all certainty is untrustable,
is untrusting of its own existence, agency and care.
This is called 'mind broke'.
CERTAINTY OF CERTAINTY is sanity.
CERTAINTY OF UNCERTAINY is sanity.
UNCERTAINTY OF CERTAINTY is insanity.
UNCERTAINTY OF UNCERTAINTY is more insanity.
That last one is "I don't know if I don't know!"
We are not talking about MEMORY here, "Well maybe I KNEW, I just
can't remember. On the other hand maybe I never knew, I just don't
know if I know!"
All certainty and uncertainty is in present time.
If you don't know something NOW, then you are certainly uncertain
of it NOW. Now is a stream of conscious perfect certainties.
A thetan however can doubt anything, even that he is doubting.
This is willfull out integrity.
Personal integrity is:
"I doubt I am, therefore I am, for a nothing could never wonder
if it was a nothing or a something." --Decartes
Homer
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plate 1: Party Line
A party line is a fixed idea, pet theory, or other philosophical
vanity that when confronted by evidence or reason that it is wrong,
over rules that evidence or reason.
People may be stuck in one or more party lines.
The core party line is the perfect certainty that perfect
certainty is impossible, untrustable, undesirable, unimportant or
useless.
We call this 'mind broke'.
Perfect certainty of uncertainty is the beginning of personal
integrity.
#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plate 2: Logic
Logic is the ethics of language, a description of IS AND IS NOT.
If you say "All dogs are animals, and Joey is an animal, but Joey
is not a dog", what have you said?
If you say "All that comes from God is good, and Man came from
God, but Man is not all good," what have you said? It is good that
Man is not all good?
Logic means:
IS is IS. IS means IS.
IS is not IS NOT. IS does not mean IS NOT.
IS NOT is IS NOT. IS NOT means IS NOT.
IS NOT is not IS. IS NOT does not mean IS.
Bi valued logic means:
A is A.
A is not not A.
Its never the case that A and not A.
It is always the case that A or not A.
Any use of the word IS and all of its grammatical equivalents is
a use and assertion of the validity of bi valued logic.
For example the statement "Logic IS invalid", is nuts, as it is
using logic to deny logic.
Some would assert that multi or infinite valued logic is a
superset of bi valued logic, but the assertion that it *IS* anything,
automatically makes it a subset of bi valued logic.
To assert that infinite valued logic *IS* better than bi valued
logic is to use bi valued logic to make the assertion.
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Tue Jul 18 13:08:50 EDT 2006
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sat Aug 7 03:06:03 EDT 2010
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore350.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFMXQXbURT1lqxE3HERAvDgAJ9usvf5WGHSs4da7sUPO18z1keYwwCfS12Y
O5tQnOP5p5G3zku95vCBryE=
=O2pX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Homerwsmith-l mailing list
Homerwsmith-l@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
No comments:
Post a Comment