Hash: SHA1
PERSONAL INTEGRITY
Personal integrity is knowing what you know, and not knowing what
you don't know.
This includes knowing what you can't know, and not knowing what is
obvious.
Willfull out personal intengrity is a spiritual High Crime.
Out personal integrity leads to sickness.
The sickness is 'Just Desserts' for commission of a High Crime.
The sickness is not enforced externally, it follows naturally,
Justice is you get what you postulate.
People have long known that lying is no good for you. Generally
lying is considered any form of saying that something is false which
is true, or saying something is true which is false.
However we wish to draw your attention to a different kind of
lying, namely saying that something which is certainly true or false
is *UNCERTAIN*, or saying something which is uncertain is certainly
true or false. THESE lies are what make people sick.
No one has ever told you that before.
Its the creation of uncertainties from certainties and the
creation of certainties from uncertainies that are the problem.
Merely reversing the truth of a certainty from true to false
causes little problem in comparison.
The primary acts of willfull out integrity are
1.) Enforcing a false certainty.
2.) Doubting a true certainty
MAKING A CERTAINTY OUT OF AN UNCERTAINTY
It is not possible to have a true certainty turn out false. If
it turns out false, it was never certain. But people can enforce an
uncertainty into a certainty, which then is a false cerainty, even if
it turns out later to be true!
Any 'certainty' that turns out to be false later was never a
true certainty in the first place, but an act of willfull out
integrity. Once false certainties are spotted, the person can tell
that he was never truely certain of it in the first place and knew it.
MAKING AN UNCERTAINTY OUT OF A CERTAINTY
Doubting a true certainty is a high crime. Truth is a jealous
God. If something is true, and you know it is true, and there is no
possibility of it being false, then you deserve what you get if you
doubt it willfully.
Doubt creates evidence in its own favor, this locks the person
into the doubt.
Since doubt is self casting, it is easy to doubt a true
certainty, to turn a true certainty into a false uncertainty.
Turning certainties into false uncertainties, or turning
uncertainties into false certainties are both forms of willfull out
integrity and lead ultimately to ludicrous demise. At the end of the
chain the being will be found in wonder.
Wondering why he is sick.
To clear this up find and run the following items per tech of
choice.
Certainty
Uncertainty
Doubted Certainty
Doubted Uncertainty
False Certainty
False Uncertainty
Making certainties into false uncertainties.
Making uncertainties into false certainties.
Making true certainties wrong, and false certainties right.
Making true uncertainies wrong, and false uncertainties right.
And full CDEINR scale on certainty and uncertainty, with
particular attention to enforced, inhibited, NO, denied and refused
certainties and uncertanties.
Remember that 'NO" certainty doesn't mean he's got an
uncertainty, it means he has made nothing out of certainty!
E/P all operatingness nominal again.
ANDS AND NEITHERS
Beings are dramatizing dicoms in ANDS and NEITHERS, not in ORS.
The basic dicoms are love and hate, beauty and ugly and good and
evil, but there are many more specific to the person such as respect
and contempt, blessingness and damningness, integration and
disintegration etc.
He won't be dramatizing loving or hating his mother, but loving
AND hating his mother. This forms a ridge, one effort that does both
at the same time. Thus when he loves his mother, he will be
dramatizing the effort of the ridge, and when he hates his mother he
will be dramatizing the same effort!
Aberration is in the illogic of the situtation, loving by hating,
and hating by loving.
The ridge gets buried in NEITHERS, neither loving nor hating his
mother. So eventually there is nothing there.
The person won't feel anything about his mother. That's a
neither, neither love nor hate. Once that is removed, the underlying
ridge of LOVE AND HATE will surface with great turmoil and anguish.
You can't love by hating, and you can't hate by loving, it will
take the person a while to figure this out.
if you can get the person to separate them in time and effort, he
will start to do better. Now I love her, now I hate her, now I love
her, not I hate her with a different effort for each one. That's
sane.
Any serious ridge will be found to be an AND not an OR. It is
tempting to think that the person is being good and fighting evil, or
being evil and fighting good.
But if he has a RIDGE on the matter, which includes all GPMS, he
is actually dramatizing both sides at once. He, as good, can't get
into a fight with evil without being the evil side also, if only to
invite it in and fight it.
This is a lower harmonic mockery of pandeterminism at work.
Thus auditing being good or evil won't fly, but auditing good AND
evil will.
Remember the AND is buried under a NEITHER, being neither good
nor evil, that's a final solution to the problem of the AND.
Assess for NEITHER, or AND. Which ever reads find the item pairs
that go with it, and run them as neithers or ands. Running each side
back and forth as Hubbard originally suggested may not work as well.
Running what problem did you have with your mother, and then what
problem did your mother have with you is running an OR, its running
either you had a problem with your mother or your mother had a problem
with you.
Running what is it between you and your mother, is running an
AND, its running what you both did to each other at the exact same
time. Only these form ridges or any merit to run.
When did you try to cripple someone?
When did someone try to cripple you?
That's an OR you see?
When did you and another try to cripple each other at the same
time?
That's an AND.
Ridges that have different time stamps in either side of the
ridge don't stay together long once the ANDS are run. Its the AND
ridges that have the same time stamp in both sides that are the
foundation of case.
What does the guy want AND not want at the same time? We are not
talking about oscillation, vacilation, indecision, waivering flip
flopping, equivocation, those don't form ridges that have any solidity
to them.
We want what he wants and doesn't want at the same time. Thus
his effort to have it will be the same effort to not have it. THAT
forms a ridge.
No it is not logical, and yes it is hard to conceive, and perhaps
one won't believe it until one sees it, but that's why case is so
persistent, its nuts. It exceeds our sensibilities.
Applied to the above posting on personal integrity, look for
ridges where the guy is both certain AND uncertain at the same time
about the same thing. That will drive him crazy.
Homer
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Sat Jul 15 15:06:33 EDT 2006
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Mon Sep 20 15:56:28 EDT 2010
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore344.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFMl7xsURT1lqxE3HERAhD5AKC4MeVxyYvA0HhHgRE7kwUnEGqdtQCgjEmo
KZfpAChN8g9zufAsUykcDI4=
=RaPD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Homerwsmith-l mailing list
Homerwsmith-l@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
No comments:
Post a Comment