Sunday, May 22, 2011

THE NATURE OF THE PROOF Part 2

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


THE NATURE OF THE PROOF, Part 2

((Difficult and technical, not meant to be an easy read.))

In the first part of this series we defined the concept of
learning.

Learning is a process, meaning a series of changes in state, in one
or more sequential objects in space and time.

Such sequential objects in space and time. that are causally
related to each other, is called a causal pathway.

Data is carried along a causal pathway from original referent to
symbol of final authority.

Thus we can say that a causal pathway IS a process of learning, by
each symbol along the way, about the referents before it.

And any causal pathway is a process of learning from original
source of data to final edifiant (one who is edified).

Source = referent, edifiant = symbol.

Thus the process of cause and effect traveling in space and time
along a causal pathway, IS learning, and the process of learning IS
cause and effect.

Now remember from original works, that there are two kinds of
qualities an object can have, qualities of being and qualities of
relation.

Qualities of being, the object has alone, and qualities of
relation, the object has because of its relation to other objects.

There are many ways two objects can be related to each other, an
incomplete list would be: spatial (next to), temporal (before/after),
material (heavier than), energetic (faster than), and causal (father of,
cause of etc.)

The only quality of relation of importance to learning, is the
quality of causal relation.

The quality of causal relation is simply how A affected B to change
state. That causal relation is in BOTH quality sets describing A and B.

It is a quality of A that A caused B to change state, and it is a
quality of B that A caused B to change state.

The reason that causal relations are the only quality of importance
to learning, is because if A has any qualities at all that do not affect
its ability to change B's state, then B can never know about them.

B can only respond to the qualities of A that can causally affect
B, namely A's qualities of causal relation.

When A causes B to change state, the original nature of A may have
no similarity with the final changes in state in B.

Renditions are *SYMBOLIC* and may bear no resemblance to what they
symbolize.

For example if A is big and fat and standing on a scale, the scale
will read 312 and go BEEP!

There is no 312 and no BEEP anywhere in A, so one has to interpret
the changes in B to find the corresponding qualities in A that caused
the result in B.

The 312 and BEEP in B we call a RENDIITON of A's nature in B's
RENDITION ZONE, namely the scale's dial and sound apparatus. Most of
the scale per se is left unaffected, only some of it changes state as a
result of A.

From the rendition in B's nature, we then try to interpret back to
A's nature.

Rendition is a theory in forward motion, and interpretation is a
theory in reverse motion.

If the nature of A affects the nature of B, then the new nature of
B, the rendition in B, is evidence for the rendering nature of A that
rendered B into B' new state. The rendering nature of A, A's ability
to change B, is a theoretical model for how the change in B came to be.

Thus if the theory is workable, then A creates a rendition of its
nature in B. That's the theory in forward motion.

And if the theory is workable, from the rendering in the nature of
B, we can interpret back to to the nature of A. That's the theory in
reverse motion.

A rendition of an object is a symbolic recreation of that object's
nature later in time in ANOTHER DIFFERENT OBJECT.

Referent and symbol are two different objects always separated in
time and often separated in space, where referent and symbol are
connected by a causal pathway between each other.

An interpretation of an object is a reconstruction of the nature of
the original referent from which the symbolic rendition was made.

CONJUGATIONS OF TO RENDER AND TO INTERPRET

To render means to create a rendition of.

Thus A renders its nature in a rendition in B.

Rendering has two related usages, verb and noun.

1.) Rendering is the process of A rendering its nature in the
rendition zone of B.

2.) A is the rendered. B is the rendering.

The rendition zone is the exact place in B where A was rendered.

To interpret means to recreate the nature of A from the rendition
in B.

An interpretation is such a recreation of the nature of A, from the
rendition in B.

Interpreting refers to the process of recreating the nature of A
from the rendition in B.

Rendition produces the symbol from the referent.

Interpretation produces (recovers) the referent from the symbol.

In the language of algebra, where y = f(x) and:

r = referent
s = symbol
R = Rendition
I = Interpretation

Then we have:

s = R(r) or

Symbol = Rendition(referent) (rendition of referent).

r = I(s) or

Referent = Interpretation(symbol) (interpretation of symbol).

The domain of any function are the valid inputs to that
function.

The range of any function are the valid outputs of that function.

Rendition and interpretation are functions, or operators.

Referents and symbols are operands.

The domain of rendition is referents.

The range of rendition is symbols.

The domain of interpretation is symbols.

The range of interpretation are referents.

We beat this matter to death because the wages of sin is meatballhood
and death, thinking that what sees is made of what it sees.

Sin is confusing symbol for referent, rendition for interpretation.

Only through a full confession and repentence can a man be born
again into the Kingdom of Consciousness.

Homer

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com

======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Sun May 22 14:56:50 EDT 2011
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore867.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFN2VxyURT1lqxE3HERAl03AJ4nSwfGBTcQa0kY3T1ZN9hzh1kZiwCgogwe
yZf7L5V6qzq1tKAkZXay6Kw=
=v76T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Homerwsmith-l mailing list
Homerwsmith-l@mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l

No comments:

Post a Comment